Message boards :
Number crunching :
older geforce cards
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Bravo6 Send message Joined: 28 Oct 99 Posts: 52 Credit: 44,947,756 RAC: 0 |
just fired up an older hp (GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz [Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7](4 processors)) that i got cheaply but has no graphics cards. I would like to add one or two to the new computer, i already have 2 geforce 1050 s alread y chugging away on another computer (doing very well) but they are still in the $180+ range. I see that the 1030 s are going for about half that, are the 1030 s worth the effort in anyone,s opinion? or are they far slower than the 1050s to be worth it? thanx "Don't worry about it, nothing is gonna be O.K. anyway.........." |
mmonnin Send message Joined: 8 Jun 17 Posts: 58 Credit: 10,176,849 RAC: 0 |
My cards are using ~2.3GB of vram with the cuda 9.0 app so I don't recommend just a 2GB card. I've never messed with the extra configs but price/performance is typically not the best at the very low end at any project. |
Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 |
just fired up an older hp (GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz [Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7](4 processors)) that i got cheaply but has no graphics cards. I would like to add one or two to the new computer, i already have 2 geforce 1050 s alread y chugging away on another computer (doing very well) but they are still in the $180+ range. I see that the 1030 s are going for about half that, are the 1030 s worth the effort in anyone,s opinion? or are they far slower than the 1050s to be worth it? I would recommend that you go with 1 1050 right now and add a second later perhaps. You will not be happy with the performance of the 1030. By the way, the 10.. series are not old cards. SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I see that the 1030 s are going for about half that, are the 1030 s worth the effort in anyone,s opinion? or are they far slower than the 1050s to be worth it? There are 2 different models of GT 1030, although you generally can't tell which one you are getting by it's model number. When it comes to crunching, the good one would be really, really, slow. The bad one is an abomination. Grant Darwin NT |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
I am getting good results with used GTX 750Ti's which are what I can afford. The GTX 1050 card has the same spec# of shaders. The GTX 1050Ti has a few more. If you are needing good results on any version of Seti gpu processing you might look at the GTX 750Ti. Prices vary but I am seeing them as low as $50 on ebay. Tom A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
Bravo6 Send message Joined: 28 Oct 99 Posts: 52 Credit: 44,947,756 RAC: 0 |
If they were made more than a month ago to my son they are OLD...... To him I am absolutely enfeebled. 😕 Thanx "Don't worry about it, nothing is gonna be O.K. anyway.........." |
Bravo6 Send message Joined: 28 Oct 99 Posts: 52 Credit: 44,947,756 RAC: 0 |
Thanx, that is what I thought. "Don't worry about it, nothing is gonna be O.K. anyway.........." |
Tom M Send message Joined: 28 Nov 02 Posts: 5124 Credit: 276,046,078 RAC: 462 |
just fired up an older hp (GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500 CPU @ 3.30GHz [Family 6 Model 42 Stepping 7](4 processors)) that i got cheaply but has no graphics cards. I would like to add one or two to the new computer, i already have 2 geforce 1050 s alread y chugging away on another computer (doing very well) but they are still in the $180+ range. I see that the 1030 s are going for about half that, are the 1030 s worth the effort in anyone,s opinion? or are they far slower than the 1050s to be worth it? If money is tight start with a used gtx 750ti, even two of them which should give you equivalent performance to a 1050Ti at $50 less.... A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association). |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.