Message boards :
Number crunching :
Don't know where it should go? Stick it here!
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 126 · 127 · 128 · 129 · 130 · 131 · 132 . . . 148 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874
|
Testing, testing. Just seeing if I've still got a green star - about 36 hours after the anniversary. What is everyone else doing - contributing to a fighting fund for next time, or accepting that the game is over? |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873
|
Good question. Do we keep our stars and donor widgets after a year without donating to the project again? Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
rob smith ![]() Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22877 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380
|
Let's see, I haven't donated for over a year, so are my stickers & star showing? Yes, so it looks as if one's donation status has been frozen. Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13985 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Grant Darwin NT |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873
|
Ha ha aha LOL. "Exploded view" of a typical computer. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 21916 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20
|
Very good and good fun! :-) That reminds me of: Christ of Saint John of the Cross However: Not sure I'd be happy to sit under that little lot; And I dread to think about the RFI flying out from that! (Or is that room inside some reinforced concrete bunker Faraday cage?!) Happy cool crunchin'! Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13985 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Still waiting for 3rd party reviews, but it's looking like AMD is finally back in the video card game. Nvidia are going to have to get serious again. Grant Darwin NT |
|
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89
|
Thanks everyone for the feedback on the RTX 30 cards. I am yet to come across a host I can access host details using a boinc project to see how fast they are using boinc. If anybody is aware of one I am also on the lookout for a rendering project. TIA
|
|
Ian&Steve C. Send message Joined: 28 Sep 99 Posts: 4267 Credit: 1,282,604,591 RAC: 6,640
|
Thanks everyone for the feedback on the RTX 30 cards. I am yet to come across a host I can access host details using a boinc project to see how fast they are using boinc. I recently just picked up an RTX 3070. I'm waiting for the GPUGRID app to be updated before I can use it though. I should be able to run some benchmarks on it for you. do you have anything specific you're looking for? I also already updated the SETI Linux Special application to CUDA 11.1, and ran through my collection of old SETI WUs. I put it up head to head with the RTX 2080ti since games performance is supposed to be similar. FOR SETI WORKLOADS ONLY: RTX 3070 is about 75-85% speed compared to 2080ti. RTX 3070 used about 200W during the WU runs RTX 2080ti used about 225W during the runs RTX 3070 = 46 SMs w/ 128 "cores" per SM RTX 2080ti = 68 SMs w/ 64 cores per SM The SETI special app seems to scale really well with SM count, and the RTX 30 series cards in general have half the SMs compared to Turing. It is my theory that the SETI app is coded using a lot of integer operations, thereby reducing the effective CUDA core count for the 3070. remember there was a huge change to the architecture with Ampere, and such a change had massive improvements for FP32 operations, but almost no change for INT performance (per SM) compared to Turing Ampere cannot do INT+FP32+FP32, it's more [INT or FP32]+FP32. so you wont see much gain where there's a large amount of INT operations to do. I haven't gotten around to throwing it up on Einstein yet. but a benchmark will be easier and provide more consistent data and a clearer comparison. Seti@Home classic workunits: 29,492 CPU time: 134,419 hours
|
Gene ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Apr 99 Posts: 150 Credit: 48,393,279 RAC: 118
|
Has anybody else noticed the sort-order reversed in the message board index? For example, click on "News" and the selection choices are : 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 --- 13 - Next. "1" is the most recent and "13" is oldest. Within the individual threads the order is in what I always thought was "normal" i.e. "1" is oldest and "..biggest number.." is newest. I ran across this when I aimed to read latest news, went to ->Message Boards ->News -> 13 / and got postings from 2004! Did I mess up a setting somewhere that customizes the order? |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873
|
Forum threads are listed by the sort order you set in each page you are viewing. Either Newest post first, most views first, most posts first or newest first. You also can set your forum message preference globally in your Community Preferences in your Message and Display section. https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/edit_forum_preferences_form.php Also each forum can have "sticky" messages that are pinned to the top of the thread list. These don't move and are not factored into the sort order. This is probably what you were dealing with in News. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
|
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89
|
Thank you for is this information. I was just genuinely interested to see how much faster they were than their RTX predecessors. In my original post I forgot to mention that I run Windows so I imagine run times would be slightly slower but still very impressive from the information you provided. I will watch with interest to see how your card preforms at Einstein. I have just had a look and I cannot find any hosts with 370s in them. Linux and AMD cards definitely seem to perform the best there Out of complete curiosity are you intending to use your 370 solely for GPU processing?
|
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13985 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Also each forum can have "sticky" messages that are pinned to the top of the thread list. These don't move and are not factored into the sort order.And in your account preferences you can choose to have them not to be sticky. Message boards and private messages Community preferences, Message display, Don't move sticky posts to top. Grant Darwin NT |
Gene ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Apr 99 Posts: 150 Credit: 48,393,279 RAC: 118
|
@Keith Forum threads are listed by the sort order you set in each page you are viewing. Either Newest post first, most views first, most posts first or newest first. As you have correctly listed the choices - there is no "oldest post first" for the Thread list (like there is within a thread for sorting posts). It defaults to the correct, i.e. expected, order but sometimes the mental reflex is to go to the "end" of the list without thinking of the sort order. I guess the obvious solution is to choose "newest first" in my account preferences (for message threads) then it will be the same in both contexts. And although "Newest post first" and "Newest first" look equivalent I interpret the second one to mean "sorted according to the thread START date" whereas the first one means "sorted by message POST date." I can experiment a bit with those choices and figure it out. |
|
Ian&Steve C. Send message Joined: 28 Sep 99 Posts: 4267 Credit: 1,282,604,591 RAC: 6,640
|
Thank you for is this information. As far as Einstein performance: the 2080ti does the current batch GW tasks in about 4 minutes, using 225W (360 t/day) the 3070 does the current batch GW tasks in about 5 minutes, using 170W (288 t/day) the 2080ti does the FGRP tasks in about 6 minutes, using 225W (240 t/day) the 3070 does the FGRP tasks in about 7:20 minutes, using 150W (196.4 t/day) so for Einstein GW tasks, the 3070 is about 5% more efficient and for the Einstein GR tasks, the 3070 is about 19% more efficient only planning to use the 3070 for distributed computing. Seti@Home classic workunits: 29,492 CPU time: 134,419 hours
|
|
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1648 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89
|
Thanks for your information. I hope you get the results you are looking for from your 3070
|
|
Dr Who Fan Send message Joined: 8 Jan 01 Posts: 3558 Credit: 715,342 RAC: 4
|
Anyone have a record player and an IBM PC sitting around waiting to get used? Master boot vinyl record: It just gives DOS on my IBM PC a warmer, more authentic tone And on the B-side: Linux? |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 38450 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489
|
Anyone have a record player and an IBM PC sitting around waiting to get used?And I thought that I was bored while booting up an old 2002 Celeron rig with WinXP on it over the weekend, but I can't see me getting that bored. :-O Cheers. |
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13985 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
The RTX 3060Ti reviews are out. This is a good summary of the results from Phoronix Across all the compute tests run, the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti was on par with the RTX 2080 Ti / TITAN Grant Darwin NT |
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13985 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Grant Darwin NT |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.