Facepalm...Exciting times lol

No work for me as of yet! :(

And RAC took a BIG dive again! :((

. . Yep, downtime really hits the RAC hard ...

Stephen

:(

Facepalm...Exciting times lol

Indeed. So exciting, that I'm not quite sure, just how much more excitement I can handle.

---

Don't take life too seriously, as you'll never come out of it alive!

Facepalm...Exciting times lol

Indeed. So exciting, that I'm not quite sure, just how much more excitement I can handle.

One of my little crunchers threw such a temper tantrum that I had to stand it in the corner for a bit.
After threatening it with no Einsteins for a week, it finally settled down....

---

Eric posted in the news thread that the current work is courtesy of Matt and Dropbox. And at the usual present rate of consumption will last about a day and a half (if everyone's caches were full).
He's still having difficulties convincing the Uni tech support mob there is an issue.
Maybe tomorrow.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

Eric posted in the news thread that the current work is courtesy of Matt and Dropbox. And at the usual present rate of consumption will last about a day and a half (if everyone's caches were full).
He's still having difficulties convincing the Uni tech support mob there is an issue.
Maybe tomorrow.

. . And people wonder why tech support has a bad rep ... :)

Stephen

? ?

I'm blessed just got a WU lol (first one today)

I'm blessed just got a WU lol (first one today)

. . I've got 5 APs stuck on my fast rig. They try to run then stop and go to "waiting to run" status. I've checked app_info.xml and the section for APs is there and the app files are in the folder too. Strangely there were 2 sections for AP_V7 so I commented out the second section (older version) but still they will not run. If I could send them to you you would be welcome to them :)

Stephen

:)

Tossed my hat on the ground for donations lol

So, nine hours after the project came back online, I finally have full caches. Took forever to get any cpu tasks on two of the crunchers, only within the last hour did one machine get any cpu work.

So wasn't the cpu cache or slowest hardware supposed to get filled first? Or do I have that backwards?

---

Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours

A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association)

So wasn't the cpu cache or slowest hardware supposed to get filled first? Or do I have that backwards?

I don't know what's supposed to happen, but it's always been the faster processor that gets work first.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

Just got my 2nd WU both have been GPU, mean while digging a hole so my RAC has a free run South, I may see China after all :P~

Just got my 2nd WU both have been GPU, mean while digging a hole so my RAC has a free run South, I may see China after all :P~

. . Work has been patchy, often getting the "no work available" response, but I now have full or near full caches. What do you have your work request set to? Try opening it up to the max, get 10 days with 0 or 0.1 set for the additional days. That should get a few and request more every 5 mins or with each completed task.

. . Hope your downloads pick up.

Stephen

. .

Just got my 2nd WU both have been GPU, mean while digging a hole so my RAC has a free run South, I may see China after all :P~

You've downloaded a whole bunch of Milkyway work, due Feb5. So your system is going to be busy crunching that, before it can get much more Seti work.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

"sarcastic mode " O:-)

i have to apologize to the others who doesn't have enough CPU WU for them ...

Seti still give me too mush CPU WU for 1day cache parameter ...

[url]http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=7019416&offset=40&show_names=0&state=4&appid= [/url]

i have to apologize for my wingmens too because of a ten to thirteen days lag in CPU crunching ...

5 to 8 CPU wu a day ... but still have 63 CPU WU in cache ...

something goes wrong with seti servers ...

---

something goes wrong with seti servers ...

SURPRISE!!!!

---

So wasn't the cpu cache or slowest hardware supposed to get filled first? Or do I have that backwards?

I don't know what's supposed to happen, but it's always been the faster processor that gets work first.

Yes, it was fastest device first IIRC.
Now my CPU is the fastest device but i always get work for GPU first.

---

With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.

I am just hoping that IT gets to the root of the comms problem and they don't have to keep bouncing batches of work off the cloud to get it to the splitters.
If not, it was a rather creative way to do it.
Maybe that process could be automated if necessary.
Of course, the scientific view would be that the extra transfer diminishes the integrity of the data. Chain of possession.

---

"Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once."

i have to notice you another fact i've forgotten ...

asking for CPU task is uncheck till 1-2 month ... still receiving them ...

---

Do you have "receive other tasks" tagged?

---

Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?