A very steep decline in Average Credits!!!

Message boards : Number crunching : A very steep decline in Average Credits!!!
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 14 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile B. Ahmet KIRAN

Send message
Joined: 19 Oct 14
Posts: 39
Credit: 20,647,937
RAC: 20,373
Turkey
Message 1911753 - Posted: 8 Jan 2018, 12:14:42 UTC

In the last 6~7 days, there has been a very steep decline in RAC in all my (10 of them) machines... Has anyone else encountered the same? If so have they found reasons and/or remedies for such? SOMEONE HELP!!! We all like to see our RAC's stable, if not increasing... But a steep decrease??? There must be an explanation to this...
Advance Thanks for any response...
ID: 1911753 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile KWSN Ekky Ekky Ekky Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 May 99
Posts: 943
Credit: 32,256,455
RAC: 32,531
United Kingdom
Message 1911754 - Posted: 8 Jan 2018, 12:50:44 UTC - in response to Message 1911753.  

Same here but I also wonder if there is a problem with dowloads which is going unrecognised? I am suffering the dreaded "Retry in xxx minutes" time and time again, project backoff etc. Computers go to one or the other or both very quickly indeed, even though there is absolutely no problem with Internet access, routers or anything else.
As a result, work does not get reported. Anyone any ideas?
ID: 1911754 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
kittyman Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 49852
Credit: 914,810,511
RAC: 159,892
United States
Message 1911755 - Posted: 8 Jan 2018, 13:07:43 UTC - in response to Message 1911754.  

Same here but I also wonder if there is a problem with dowloads which is going unrecognised? I am suffering the dreaded "Retry in xxx minutes" time and time again, project backoff etc. Computers go to one or the other or both very quickly indeed, even though there is absolutely no problem with Internet access, routers or anything else.
As a result, work does not get reported. Anyone any ideas?

See the Panic Mode thread for a workaround for the download issue.
Meow.
What meowing lurks in the hearts of man? The kittyman knows....MEOWhahahahahahha!

Have made friends here.
Most were cats.
ID: 1911755 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Ghia
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 17
Posts: 164
Credit: 13,840,338
RAC: 23,389
Norway
Message 1911756 - Posted: 8 Jan 2018, 13:08:30 UTC

The current download problem has been discussed in depth in the Panic Mode thread.
Use the manual "Retry pending transfers" option in Boinc Manager,
or better, add the servers to your hosts file like this :

208.68.240.118 setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu
208.68.240.119 boinc2.ssl.berkeley.edu
208.68.240.126 setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu
#208.68.240.127 vader.ssl.berkeley.edu
Humans may rule the world...but bacteria run it...
ID: 1911756 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Bernie Vine
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 9288
Credit: 56,815,751
RAC: 17,350
United Kingdom
Message 1911757 - Posted: 8 Jan 2018, 13:13:40 UTC

There were server problems last week as was detailed on the main page and in the news thread. So yes it will have impacted RAC
ID: 1911757 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
BetelgeuseFive Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Jul 99
Posts: 132
Credit: 13,590,297
RAC: 5,241
Netherlands
Message 1911764 - Posted: 8 Jan 2018, 15:20:21 UTC

Eric posted the following in the news thread:

And you've probably noticed that we are out of Arecibo data. We don't have a good idea of when we'll get more.

This means no Astropulse and that may also have an impact on RAC (at least is does for me ...)

Tom
ID: 1911764 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile KWSN Ekky Ekky Ekky Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 May 99
Posts: 943
Credit: 32,256,455
RAC: 32,531
United Kingdom
Message 1911767 - Posted: 8 Jan 2018, 16:31:00 UTC

Thank you all for your advice. Good to know it is all of us!
I do not trust myself to use the cmd window so I shall use a combination of patience and the retry button.
ID: 1911767 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6530
Credit: 185,695,682
RAC: 44,166
United States
Message 1911959 - Posted: 9 Jan 2018, 4:21:10 UTC
Last modified: 9 Jan 2018, 4:21:18 UTC

My RAC is still going up after the server issues in December.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!
ID: 1911959 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
juan BFP Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 6881
Credit: 386,503,533
RAC: 159,727
Panama
Message 1911984 - Posted: 9 Jan 2018, 5:49:07 UTC

My main host daily production drops from 200K/day to 150K/day with the blc05 diet.

Another reason why i hate creditscrew!
ID: 1911984 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 9902
Credit: 128,567,829
RAC: 81,283
Australia
Message 1911985 - Posted: 9 Jan 2018, 5:52:12 UTC

And for those that used to process AP work, there will be the loss of that significant boost to RAC as well as the effects of Credit New.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1911985 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Iona
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 07
Posts: 783
Credit: 12,321,287
RAC: 17,088
United Kingdom
Message 1911994 - Posted: 9 Jan 2018, 7:27:03 UTC

A 'Perfect Storm' kind of thing with Credit Screw, lack of Astropulse and nothing but BLC work (its not even the stuff that takes 50% longer to process, either!). I certainly won't be throwing more hardware resources at it, to compensate, though.
Don't take life too seriously, as you'll never come out of it alive!
ID: 1911994 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Mr. Kevvy Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 2011
Credit: 466,631,549
RAC: 405,809
Canada
Message 1912000 - Posted: 9 Jan 2018, 9:16:14 UTC

Well, if it helps, we have been expecting this for a long time... I'm pretty sure all of the Arecibo work was from old drives (aka tapes) being reprocessed to take advantage of the algorithm updates, but we've known it was limited. Even without Maria Arecibo had been defunded and was expecting closure. The BL work units being targeted at optimal local star systems compensate by (probably) having a much greater chance of actually finding something!

Soon Parkes will be online too (and its work will also doubtless all be BL VLAR as well.) So we're going to be awash in higher-quality work to do. What's not to like? :^)
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.”
--- Margaret Mead

ID: 1912000 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 9902
Credit: 128,567,829
RAC: 81,283
Australia
Message 1912001 - Posted: 9 Jan 2018, 9:23:04 UTC - in response to Message 1912000.  

What's not to like? :^)

Getting less credit for doing more does suck.

My C2D doesn't do AP work. It's doing the current GBT CPU WUs in less than half the time it took to do the earlier ones. About 30min saved on the GPU run times, so i'm doing heaps more work per hour than I was. Yet my RAC is falling like a stone.
It's great to have plenty of work, it's not great to get even less acknowledgement for the work we're doing.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1912001 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Cruncher-American Special Project $75 donor

Send message
Joined: 25 Mar 02
Posts: 1448
Credit: 265,777,526
RAC: 149,059
United States
Message 1912006 - Posted: 9 Jan 2018, 10:18:24 UTC

It's great to have plenty of work, it's not great to get even less acknowledgement for the work we're doing



Amen, bro!
ID: 1912006 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
juan BFP Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 6881
Credit: 386,503,533
RAC: 159,727
Panama
Message 1912259 - Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 0:26:06 UTC

My RAC


ID: 1912259 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 4486
Credit: 279,799,028
RAC: 626,956
United States
Message 1912261 - Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 0:36:21 UTC

If you want to be a credit monger, the best choices seem to be any of the pure math solving projects for max credit awarded. Next in line seems to be the chemistry/medical projects. I have no problem with the higher credit they award but they just don't strike my interest that much. There is even that nice project comparison chart over at BoincStats to see where the most popular projects fall out in comparison with each other as to how much credit they award for work.

Project credit comparison
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours
ID: 1912261 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
juan BFP Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 6881
Credit: 386,503,533
RAC: 159,727
Panama
Message 1912265 - Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 0:54:09 UTC - in response to Message 1912261.  
Last modified: 11 Jan 2018, 0:58:18 UTC

I don't want more credit, just want to receive the same amount of credit for each WU when they took the same amount of time to crunch on the same host.

A simple example: both blc05 crunched on the same host

WU 1 - Task 6302591637 Crunching Time 2 min 26 sec Credit 41.81
WU 2 - Task 6302552310 Crunching Time 2 min 25 sec Credit 51.63

Same crunching time (1 sec dif) and totally different credit awarded. about 20 % of difference.
Credit is the way we could easelly measure how our host is working, but with this difference is impossible to be sure.

Same Crunching time & Same Type of WU = Same credit not care if is 41.81 or 51.63 just care to be the same. That's all i ask for

That 's one of the reasons why I hate creditscrew.
ID: 1912265 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keith Myers Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Apr 01
Posts: 4486
Credit: 279,799,028
RAC: 626,956
United States
Message 1912281 - Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 2:25:32 UTC - in response to Message 1912265.  

That 's one of the reasons why I hate creditscrew.


Ahh, c'mon Juan .... you know by now that creditscrew is a random number generator. LOL.
Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours
ID: 1912281 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
juan BFP Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 07
Posts: 6881
Credit: 386,503,533
RAC: 159,727
Panama
Message 1912284 - Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 2:33:29 UTC - in response to Message 1912281.  
Last modified: 11 Jan 2018, 2:35:19 UTC

Ahh, c'mon Juan .... you know by now that creditscrew is a random number generator. LOL.

Yes i know, but why always they set RAND_MAX to a lower number? :) ROFL
ID: 1912284 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Mr. Kevvy Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 2011
Credit: 466,631,549
RAC: 405,809
Canada
Message 1912287 - Posted: 11 Jan 2018, 2:45:21 UTC - in response to Message 1912261.  

I have no problem with the higher credit they award but they just don't strike my interest that much.


Which is precisely why they award the higher credit. :^)
“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.”
--- Margaret Mead

ID: 1912287 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 14 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : A very steep decline in Average Credits!!!


 
©2018 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.