Think about it, under your logic, the next step will be a Republican Trial.

Think about it, under your logic, the next step will be a Republican Trial.

Dear Nick, I didn't say that. All the post you responded to said:

I just corrected a poster who doesn't understand how our House of Representatives and their political party's really operate.

The Democrats voted for this Hearing. The Republicans voted against this Hearing. The Democrat Chairmen, Schiff, repeatedly stops Republican questions. But the Republican's don't have the authority to stop Democrat questions.

Therefore, describing this Hearing as a Democrat Hearing is correct.

Oh, but you did.

You said it was a Democratic Hearing.

The next logical step is a Trial, held by Republicans.

Gonna favor everyone with a twofer......

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Now I'd call that a double backward step while using a mirror to try and deflect others from the real story of that crook v2.0.

And one more for the road.......

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

But that wasn't bribery Eye, that was getting rid of corruption, so what foolish are you going to post next?

And what's the problem with having a hearing? Should there be no hearings?

......a Hearing is a legal proceeding where someone is actually Listening........

No eye, you are thinking of a PRELIMINARY hearing in a courtroom under the judicial branch. Legislative bodies have hearings, but they are different. You do understand some words have more than one meaning?

Now as to your memes, essentially they say: "Al Capone cheated on his taxes, so I can bribe the IRS to drop the charges." Let us know how that works out for you.

She wouldn't put up Der Fuehrer's Face
The buffoon must be going through his 2nd childhood.

She wouldn't put up Der Fuehrer's Face
The buffoon must be going through his 2nd childhood.

Likely legal to order his pic on the wall. Hang it behind something so it can't be seen. All legal.

She wouldn't put up Der Fuehrer's Face
The buffoon must be going through his 2nd childhood.

Likely legal to order his pic on the wall. Hang it behind something so it can't be seen. All legal.

True, but ranting about it in public shows his pettiness wouldn't you say?

Pettiness
undue concern with trivial matters, especially of a small-minded or spiteful nature.
lack of importance or worth; triviality.

She wouldn't put up Der Fuehrer's Face
The buffoon must be going through his 2nd childhood.

Likely legal to order his pic on the wall. Hang it behind something so it can't be seen. All legal.

True, but ranting about it in public shows his pettiness wouldn't you say?

Pettiness
undue concern with trivial matters, especially of a small-minded or spiteful nature.
lack of importance or worth; triviality.

Narcissism, to a point of being clinically unable to not harm himself or others.

Adolf used military force to achieve his aims, the blonde bimbo is using economic force to achieve his & all in the name of "national security".
There are 195 countries on this planet & only one called America.
For many years the Office of the President of the United States of America held sway throughout the world, the blonde bimbo is trivialising it.
Shame on you America!

Hitler's crimes are so petty.
Sorry, but this poster, who had Jewish relatives murdered by Hitler.

Those 2 sentences are mutually exclusive.
Economic force can be just as deadly as military force.
After all, that is Trump's rallying call to the masses "Make America Great Again"
Or has that escaped you?

Trump is not a Hitler and your attempt to say so. Is diminishing the crimes of Hitler and giving the finger to Hitler's victim's and their relatives.

Sorry, it is YOU that is diminishing the atrocities that occurred by labelling the crimes as petty.
Isn't that what Trump is doing to your country?

Where? No where. I was replying to another poster's use of the world "petty"

Re-read the relevant posts, you will find that was me.
Answer this question, which you have so expertly bypassed in your fixation of a particular era.
CAN economic force be just as deadly as military force - Yes or No?
If no, explain your reason as to why not?

$50,000 per month with no experience and his father was Vice President?
Yes, all was just a coincidence!

But in Eastern Europe and elsewhere in the world it's fairly common for well-known public figures to be given well-paid positions to improve the public image of a controversial company.

Is that like getting a bank to loan you $70million to build a building and you have no experience?

Someone beat me to the point of pointing out the hypocrisy. Clearly, Ivanka (Jared), Don Jr. & Eric have not benefited from Trump's presidency or any else their father has done or claimed to have done. Clearly.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Hitler's crimes are so petty. That dismissing his evil by comparing them with Trump is ok?

Sorry but the full stop after "petty" made me read it that way to. I find as an observer that your sentence construction can often lead to misunderstanding.

I would have written:

"Hitler's crimes are so petty that dismissing his evil by comparing them with Trump is ok?

Having outed your false accusation that it was I who described Hitler's atrocities as "petty" and not attacking those that do.

I do wish that you remember what you posted.Check the author of this post
FYI
WWI 4 years 2 months
WWII 6 years.
A total of 10 years 2 months.
1991-2019 28 years
The economic force during that time has cost millions their livelihoods & all for profits 1st & national security 2nd.
So in your opinion, which is far deadlier - 10 years 2 months of total war or 28 years of economic force which is showing no signs of decreasing?
After all, isn't that what Tump is rallying against?
He wants it to be America 1st which imho, makes him an economic dictator.
Or do you disagree?

Did you watch the testimony, as I did. Or are you relying upon the "spin" by Fox, or CNN or other outlets?

Clyde, neither I listen to it on NPR.

I will remind you yet again, 47% of us work & pay taxes. It is not possible for many of us to watch them live and energy resources are limited to watch recordings in their entirety later. That said, I did (while multi-tasking)watch or listen to some hours, with the office door shut. But, for the rest, yep, I have to listen or read summarizations and analysis. Sue me, for having a job.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

Is the public interest in this Democrat Impeachment Inquiry Hearing overwhelming?

The 13.8 million people who tuned in on ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, CSPAN and PBS marks a 31 percent drop from the number of people who watched former FBI Director James Comey’s testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee in June 2017, which delivered more than 19 million viewers.

Why do you frequently put incorrect words, as indicated above, into your comments?

By doing so it implies to me that you are a Republican Trump supporter, no matter that you claim to be impartial and critical of both parties and don't like Trump.

In answer to your question, could it be that FBI Director James Comey’s testimony only lasted one day and this hearing will go on for two or more weeks.

Gee. June. Now what possibly could happen in June?

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.