Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap

Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 268 · 269 · 270 · 271 · 272 · 273 · 274 . . . 419 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1974367 - Posted: 9 Jan 2019, 22:36:12 UTC
Last modified: 9 Jan 2019, 22:38:10 UTC

tRump's Hissy Fit

BTW if you know it is a waste of time, why do you continue with it?
"The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results." Anyone for the 25th?

<ed>Just like deportation solves the problem.
ID: 1974367 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1974372 - Posted: 9 Jan 2019, 23:04:30 UTC

Well as the majority of us know Trump just wants the longest shutdown in history to belong to him, but anyway.

Trump walks out of border wall meeting, prolonging government shutdown.

Trump isn't partial to facts when lies work better.

Trump’s desperate plea to end America’s ‘cycle of human suffering’.

Twitter baffled by Trump’s bizarre medal display during Oval Office speech. They were likely taken from some poor sod.

Trump revives threats to withhold FEMA funds from California fire recovery. Yeah right, when more than half of the California's forests are owned and managed by federal agencies that Trump cut funding to.

And the B.S. continues.

Trump calls border wall a 'medieval solution' that works and the Republicans "are totally unified" behind his hardline strategy. Even though some have come forward stating otherwise.

He's certainly feeding the mushrooms out there that's for sure.
ID: 1974372 · Report as offensive
Profile MOMMY: He is MAKING ME Read His Posts Thoughts and Prayers. GOoD Thoughts and GOoD Prayers. HATERWORLD Vs THOUGHTs and PRAYERs World. It Is a BATTLE ROYALE. Nobody LOVEs Me. Everybody HATEs Me. Why Don't I Go Eat Worms. Tasty Treats are Wormy Meat. Yes
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Jun 02
Posts: 6895
Credit: 6,588,977
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1974404 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 0:30:30 UTC

WINNING mO and mO EveryDay

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/09/voice-of-hispanic-america-salinas-many-latinos-buying-trumps-arguments-against-illegal-immigration

SWEETNESS

RUBEWorld WALKs ALWAYs from WASTE of TIMEs

OH So ORANGE YAPe

May we All have a METAMORPHOSIS. REASON. GOoD JUDGEMENT and LOVE and ORDER!!!!!
ID: 1974404 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1974405 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 0:37:48 UTC

Yep B.S. seems better to some than the actual truth.

ROFLMFAO!!!!!
ID: 1974405 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1974412 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 1:17:27 UTC - in response to Message 1974404.  

Oh
ID: 1974412 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1974415 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 1:41:37 UTC - in response to Message 1974405.  

Yep B.S. seems better to some than the actual truth.

ROFLMFAO!!!!!

Color A is all good, Color B is all crap, has seemed to work for many centuries, don't see any truth in it, so B.S. rules.
ID: 1974415 · Report as offensive
Profile Gordon Lowe
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 00
Posts: 12094
Credit: 6,317,865
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1974419 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 1:56:40 UTC

Regarding Mr. Trump's beloved wall:

I have not been included in cabinet meetings on the subject, so I don't have the figures or logistics, but it just seems like to me, that technology - drones, video surveillance, etc. - would be more cost effective than the extremely expensive and complicated construction of a physical barrier.
The mind is a weird and mysterious place
ID: 1974419 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19048
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 1974432 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 2:35:02 UTC - in response to Message 1974413.  

Trump wants his wall, but is there any evidence that it is needed? Even Trump, today, made the admission, that the numbers trying to enter, without the required paperwork, are down, further undermining his perceived requirement.
All the numbers he quotes are lies or taken out of context, and that is backed up by government departments and sometimes by his own cabinet.

So isn't it logical for the Dems to object to wasting your tax money on a wall that is not required and has little chance of been completed while he is in office, even if he gets a second term. There are dozens of eminent domain cases still outstanding from George W's 2007 fence building exercise. Building a wall of concrete or steel is a lot different to a fence, it will require a road, concrete mixing facilities etc before it is actually built.
Will there be any gates in it for use by property owners whose land has been divided?
A environmental impact assessment needs to be conducted, "what happens to the run-off when there is a storm". And it will have to include monitoring equipment and presumably manned bases for any reaction force and repair and maintenance.

If I was a member of the Dems, I would insist on detailed plans to be submitted long before allocation of significant funding. And I bet the detailed plans haven't even been started yet.

So in your words the Dems are not "stomping their feet, yelling and finally pouting"., the only one throwing a tantrum is the orange one.
ID: 1974432 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1974433 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 2:38:50 UTC - in response to Message 1974432.  

If I was a member of the Dems, I would insist on detailed plans to be submitted long before allocation of significant funding. And I bet the detailed plans haven't even been started yet.

Yep an EIS study would be very appropriate.
ID: 1974433 · Report as offensive
Profile Robert Waite
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 07
Posts: 2417
Credit: 18,192,122
RAC: 59
Canada
Message 1974439 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 2:56:03 UTC - in response to Message 1974432.  

Trump wants his wall, but is there any evidence that it is needed? Even Trump, today, made the admission, that the numbers trying to enter, without the required paperwork, are down, further undermining his perceived requirement.
All the numbers he quotes are lies or taken out of context, and that is backed up by government departments and sometimes by his own cabinet.

So isn't it logical for the Dems to object to wasting your tax money on a wall that is not required and has little chance of been completed while he is in office, even if he gets a second term. There are dozens of eminent domain cases still outstanding from George W's 2007 fence building exercise. Building a wall of concrete or steel is a lot different to a fence, it will require a road, concrete mixing facilities etc before it is actually built.
Will there be any gates in it for use by property owners whose land has been divided?
A environmental impact assessment needs to be conducted, "what happens to the run-off when there is a storm". And it will have to include monitoring equipment and presumably manned bases for any reaction force and repair and maintenance.

If I was a member of the Dems, I would insist on detailed plans to be submitted long before allocation of significant funding. And I bet the detailed plans haven't even been started yet.

So in your words the Dems are not "stomping their feet, yelling and finally pouting"., the only one throwing a tantrum is the orange one.


All excellent points that seem to have slipped past some in here.
Call me a +1
I do not fight fascists because I think I can win.
I fight them because they are fascists.
Chris Hedges

A riot is the language of the unheard. -Martin Luther King, Jr.
ID: 1974439 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1974441 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 3:07:02 UTC - in response to Message 1974439.  

Trump wants his wall, but is there any evidence that it is needed? Even Trump, today, made the admission, that the numbers trying to enter, without the required paperwork, are down, further undermining his perceived requirement.
All the numbers he quotes are lies or taken out of context, and that is backed up by government departments and sometimes by his own cabinet.

So isn't it logical for the Dems to object to wasting your tax money on a wall that is not required and has little chance of been completed while he is in office, even if he gets a second term. There are dozens of eminent domain cases still outstanding from George W's 2007 fence building exercise. Building a wall of concrete or steel is a lot different to a fence, it will require a road, concrete mixing facilities etc before it is actually built.
Will there be any gates in it for use by property owners whose land has been divided?
A environmental impact assessment needs to be conducted, "what happens to the run-off when there is a storm". And it will have to include monitoring equipment and presumably manned bases for any reaction force and repair and maintenance.

If I was a member of the Dems, I would insist on detailed plans to be submitted long before allocation of significant funding. And I bet the detailed plans haven't even been started yet.

So in your words the Dems are not "stomping their feet, yelling and finally pouting"., the only one throwing a tantrum is the orange one.


All excellent points that seem to have slipped past some in here.
Call me a +1
I'll +2 that.

But it won't matter to the mushrooms.
ID: 1974441 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1974453 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 4:46:59 UTC - in response to Message 1974433.  

If I was a member of the Dems, I would insist on detailed plans to be submitted long before allocation of significant funding. And I bet the detailed plans haven't even been started yet.

Yep an EIS study would be very appropriate.

Since "the base" rejects AGW, they also reject EIS.

99% of all smuggling into the USA happens in arms length of a CPB or ICE officer at a port of entry.

What, you thought humans jumping the fence brought it in? HA! More than 1000 tons a day crosses. Assume a man can carry a 50 pound pack. That is 40,000 human loads a day. No there aren't that many crossings a day, and most of the crossings aren't drug mules but people looking for a job.

Total 100% waste of cash. Spend it on more ATV's and agents. Nearly every foot of the border is already electronically monitored. We just don't have enough agents to catch every crossing that is detected.

Even better is reform the racist laws and let the people who want a job in by getting a medical clearance, run a criminal check, have them pay a processing fee, collect fingerprints, iris scan, facial scan, DNA make sure they have enough cash for a month and give them an ITIN and let them in. Doing so will stop far more illegal crossings than any wall ever could. Also it will let the few agents we have chase after the only illegal crosser left, the drug cartels.

How stupid is "the base" anyway?
ID: 1974453 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 11361
Credit: 29,581,041
RAC: 66
United States
Message 1974463 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 5:50:11 UTC - in response to Message 1974453.  

How stupid is "the base" anyway?

Very stupid, they don't want to solve a problem they want to fight against citizens that they don't like. The border is just collateral damage.
ID: 1974463 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 34744
Credit: 261,360,520
RAC: 489
Australia
Message 1974468 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 7:08:06 UTC - in response to Message 1974463.  

How stupid is "the base" anyway?
Very stupid, they don't want to solve a problem they want to fight against citizens that they don't like. The border is just collateral damage.
They're mushrooms. ;-)
ID: 1974468 · Report as offensive
Profile Mr. Kevvy Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 3776
Credit: 1,114,826,392
RAC: 3,319
Canada
Message 1974494 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 13:38:06 UTC - in response to Message 1974419.  

... technology - drones, video surveillance, etc. - would be more cost effective than the extremely expensive and complicated construction of a physical barrier.


Even if a wall is built, the same level of technology will be needed anyway or it will be immediately breached whether with ladders or dynamite. It would have to be continuously monitored electronically, as a wall that long would otherwise need ten thousand or so paid government employees watching it 24x7. So either the technology or employees would then make the wall itself unnecessary.
ID: 1974494 · Report as offensive
moomin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 17
Posts: 6204
Credit: 38,420
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1974500 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 14:12:00 UTC - in response to Message 1974496.  

What are the Democrat Party's proposals to secure the border?
The Democrats voted last week for $1.3B in border security.
Includes physical barriers and technology on the border.
ID: 1974500 · Report as offensive
moomin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 17
Posts: 6204
Credit: 38,420
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1974508 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 14:57:48 UTC - in response to Message 1974501.  

Perhaps the government shutdown will cost more than the wall when built.
In late 2017, analysts projected a government shutdown would cost the U.S. economy $6.5 billion per week. Standard & Poor's came up with the estimate in a report titled, "With a U.S. Government Shutdown, There Will Be Blood."
https://www.spglobal.com/en/research-insights/articles/With-A-US-Government-Shutdown-There-Will-Be-Blood
ID: 1974508 · Report as offensive
Profile JaundicedEye
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 12
Posts: 5375
Credit: 30,870,693
RAC: 1
United States
Message 1974513 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 15:46:00 UTC

So isn't it logical for the Dems to object to wasting your tax money on a wall that is not required and has little chance of been completed while he is in office, even if he gets a second term.
......which raises the question of why those very same Dims had no problem with spending up to 5 times the amount The President has requested, no less that 3 times in the last decade, the latest being in 2013?

The difference is the Trump label.

Period.

As to why Putin can build a wall 'cheaper' he doesn't have to pay Union scale for labor, and doesn't have to acquire hundreds of miles of private land at prevailing prices(even when condemned), for construction, access and 'right of way'. Since there is no 'private land' it's all 'the peoples' land.

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>
ID: 1974513 · Report as offensive
moomin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 17
Posts: 6204
Credit: 38,420
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1974515 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 15:49:40 UTC - in response to Message 1974509.  
Last modified: 10 Jan 2019, 15:53:14 UTC

The Democrat Party's unwillingness to increase funding for border security and Trump are the problem.
I think it's more of the problem how to secure borders that differs between the Republicans and the Democrats.
The Wall won't stop criminals to enter the US.
The Wall won't stop drugs flowing in to the US.
The DEA says "The majority of the flow is through POVs entering the US at legal ports of entry...", not remote stretches of the border.
Trump says it's national crisis and note that 266,000 total arrests in 2017 and 2018 where illegal aliens with a criminal record.
Yes. Most for non-voilent offenses and 80,000 traffic offenses.
Why can't Trump say like his son Trump Jr. did recently at Instagram?
"You know why you can enjoy a day at the zoo? Because walls work," Trump Jr.
ID: 1974515 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1974519 - Posted: 10 Jan 2019, 16:26:54 UTC - in response to Message 1974515.  

"You know why you can enjoy a day at the zoo? Because walls work," Trump Jr.

Because mistreating other living creatures works!
ID: 1974519 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 268 · 269 · 270 · 271 · 272 · 273 · 274 . . . 419 · Next

Message boards : Politics : Greatest Best Leader of ALL TIME Yep Dat BeeeZZZ Big BIg BIG Hands Golden Haired Long Black Coat Wearin; WINNING ALWAYS Prez #45 45ers Gots His Back. You, Not So Much.......Yap


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.