German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas has urged the United States to consider the consequences of withdrawing from the INF, including its impact on European security and on future efforts at nuclear disarmament.
"The treaty…has for 30 years been an important pillar of our European security architecture," Maas said in a statement on Sunday. "We have urged Russia to address serious allegations that it is violating the agreement. We now urge the US to consider the possible consequences [of withdrawal]," he added.

In addition:

Britain backs Trump on Russia arms treaty withdrawal

Britain’s defense secretary says his country stands “absolutely resolute” with the United States as President Donald Trump says he’ll pull out from a landmark arms control agreement with Russia.

Gavin Williamson blames Russia for endangering the treaty. He’s calling on the Kremlin to “get its house in order.”

Trump says he’ll exit the agreement because Russia has violated it “for many years” and it’s preventing the U.S. from developing new weapons.

Backing Trump, Williamson tells the Financial Times that Moscow has made a “mockery” of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/oct/21/gavin-williamson-says-britain-backs-donald-trump-u/

Understand that since Germany's economy is dependent upon Russian energy imports and Putin's goodwill. They must kiss his...

In February 2018, Williamson dined with Lubov Chernukhin, the wife of a former Putin minister, in exchange for £30,000.

And is your Country and others "out of range"? Guessing there is no more need anymore for the USA to defend others.
I do understand Germany's need to placate Evil Putin, but not other Countries.

Sarcasm is not understood by some.

His beat now is what strategists increasingly say is America’s backdoor — the Atlantic Ocean — and it now will be patrolled by his Norfolk-based 2nd Fleet.

Then, it would be my hope that both would stand together before the press and us to condemn all mobs.

Normal circumstances never produce mobs, which by the way, became quite prominent with Tea Baggers a few years ago.

Rightists didn't seem to mind mobs when it was goofy tea baggers doing the yelling.

moomin... You still believe Putin's claims and not the British regarding who really abrogated the Treaty?

Is your Country and others "out of range"? Guessing there is no more need anymore for the USA to defend others and stop Putin from initially abrogating the Treaty.

Well if Trump would decide NATO should be disbanded all together and Putin get want he wants.

Normal circumstances never produce mobs, which by the way, became quite prominent with Tea Baggers a few years ago.

Rightists didn't seem to mind mobs when it was goofy tea baggers doing the yelling.

OMG what a bit of inconvenient history to bring up.

Dear moomin...
Do we believe Putin or the British. Regarding who abrogated the Treaty.
If the British. Now what should be done?

Since then, the categories of our national debate on Vietnam have remained largely unchanged, compounded with the passage of time by an amnesia that suppresses events but remembers encrusted hatreds. A balanced judgment on Vietnam continues to elude us—and therefore the ability to draw lessons from a national tragedy which America inflicted on itself. As a result, Vietnam has become the black hole of American historical memory.*

This universalist approach had a long pedigree. From the beginning of the twentieth century, one president after another had proclaimed that America had no “selfish” interests, that its principal, if not its only, international goal was universal peace and progress. Truman, in his inaugural address of January 20, 1949, had committed his country to the objective of a world in which “all nations and all peoples are free to govern themselves as they see fit.” No purely national interest would be pursued.*

This universalist approach had a long pedigree. From the beginning of the twentieth century, one president after another had proclaimed that America had no “selfish” interests, that its principal, if not its only, international goal was universal peace and progress. Truman, in his inaugural address of January 20, 1949, had committed his country to the objective of a world in which “all nations and all peoples are free to govern themselves as they see fit.” No purely national interest would be pursued.*

*Ending the Vietnam War - Henry Kissenger 2003.

Until now!