Referring to your asinine question again? Here is a question for you: Where & provide proof, that such a late term abortion has been made? If you want reasonable discussions so badly, I suggest you pose sensible & reasonable questions, not those that one can drive a train through their holes!

sigh, the bot woke up from his home under the bridge.

I will try to answer, as I understood it. Location is no difference. The difference is only in the different opinions about the origin of human life, the maturation of the fetus and birth.

That is the question. WHO determines that & when in the pregnancy does that occur?

Unfortunately today that seems to be a religious nutcase that makes the determination.

True sadly enough. However I agree with Vadim, let scientists determine it.

Men who refuse to accept responsibilities.

Do you think such a man should be prosecuted by law? Should he be responsible?

After sexual intercourse, a man must bear responsibility. It's my opinion.

Frequently the man is gone. He may have been a tourist from another country. In the USA and much of the western world there is not a database of all DNA to find out who the man is. How can you force him to be responsible if you don't know who it is? Then we have the religious nuts who want to punish the woman for having sex without being married; forcing her to raise a child by herself without aid is one of their chief punishment tools.

True sadly enough. However I agree with Vadim, let scientists determine it.

We have a word, viability, which I used earlier.

ability to survive or live successfully

Interesting thing is when does a human become viable?

capable of surviving or living successfully

I point out there is an issue.
A fish, such as salmon, is viable as an egg. It hatches, eats and grows up all by itself. Mom and dad are already dead by the time it hatches.
A mammal, can't live by itself at birth. It needs its mothers milk to survive and also needs its mom to teach it how to hunt or scavenge.

What standard do we tell the scientists to use to make the determination? One that works for all life or one that is specific to humans?

Then we have the religious nuts who want to punish the woman for having sex without being married; forcing her to raise a child by herself without aid is one of their chief punishment tools.

Who behind closed doors, have sex with single females/males & often when at a tender age.

What slavery are you talking about?

You claim the right to tell a woman what to do with her body, IMO that's slavery.

---

What slavery are you talking about?

You claim the right to tell a woman what to do with her body, IMO that's slavery.

We could get explicit with examples of slave masters buying women for the purpose of making babies to be sold. Or we could go somewhat more recent and Islamic State raping women to have its next generation of warriors.

Forced pregnancy is ugly.

Don't forget forced marriages & "honour" killings.

It is interesting to observe that all recent posts are from men.

Does that include you?

Add another possible "if". As with many other issues, what if the 'scientists' don't agree? Then what?

That's for 2 categories of people to answer, you're in neither one :-)
1: Women
2:Scientists

Add another possible "if". As with many other issues, what if the 'scientists' don't agree? Then what?

That's for 2 categories of people to answer, you're in neither one :-)
1: Women
2:Scientists

Only women scientists?

Only women posters allowed to post?

Are you that ****** ** that you really don't know what your reading or writing?

Again, My apologizes to women for Sirius B. sidestepping any reasoned or intellect discussion regarding Your Rights. In order to continue his never ending personal attacks.

So if a woman attacks you verbally stating THAT you have no right to apologise for another & 2ndly, that you're nothing but a B/S'er regarding her rights with abortion, you would accept what she says to you?

I would add another to her statement, you're good at picking up on "slights" but useless at answering questions.

So here's a direct question for you: Would you kowtow to her or attack her as unmoral & unethical & not intellectual enough for you?

AS YOU are not a woman, you cannot defend them or denigrate with regards abortion!

Your poor man, retirement must be such a b*tch, surely there must be something you can find to keep that "moral, ethical intellect" mind busy :-)

Sigh. Too bad the under bridge dweller woke up.
Time for a bunch of posts to move so debate can continue.

Yeah, like his friends down South. Unfortunately they woke up too late :-)

I have always said that the Right of a Women to Obtain an Abortion is paramount to other possible issues.

So why deflect when others pass an opinion?
You have on many occasions called several posters "silly" that itself is a personal attack that you don't see? However a direct reply knocking your "silly" questions, you do?

Not very intellectual of you is it?

So you're leaving us?

Okay so I'll repost a question ON THE TOPIC that you have already deflected.

Show us PROOF of any doctor doing an abortion 2 weeks before full term!