Web site upgrade

Message boards : News : Web site upgrade

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 18 · Next

AuthorMessage
qbit
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 04
Posts: 629
Credit: 6,571,390
RAC: 12,486
Austria
Message 1832726 - Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 22:31:41 UTC - in response to Message 1832428.  

We changed the SETI@home web site to use Twitter Bootstrap, a CSS toolkit. This makes the site usable on small displays, and lets us use color schemes developed by other people (this one is called Slate).

Sorry, but is this some kind of joke? Did you test this on a smartphone even once? This is how it looks like while I type this on my S7:



No real mobile mode, no option to post videos, not even automatic link recognition:

www.google.com


Srsly, why?
ID: 1832726 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Carlos
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jun 99
Posts: 17860
Credit: 34,996,383
RAC: 20,566
United States
Message 1832746 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 0:20:01 UTC

Can you please go back to black and white. I have been a participant and donor for over 17 years. Like many of your loyal members I am getting older and my eyes are getting weaker. While i can read most things on with a reasonable level of contrast, this grey on grey slate is really hard to read. Please go back to a higher contrast message board.
ID: 1832746 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile JaundicedEyeProject Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Mar 12
Posts: 2840
Credit: 23,326,306
RAC: 25,498
United States
Message 1832753 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 0:35:05 UTC - in response to Message 1832746.  

Can you please go back to black and white. I have been a participant and donor for over 17 years. Like many of your loyal members I am getting older and my eyes are getting weaker. While i can read most things on with a reasonable level of contrast, this grey on grey slate is really hard to read. Please go back to a higher contrast message board.

+1 There's lots of us 'older' eyes out here.
"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." " : >
ID: 1832753 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Cavalary

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 99
Posts: 68
Credit: 4,896,698
RAC: 2,551
Romania
Message 1832778 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 2:26:15 UTC

Just stopping by here to add an ew at the dark scheme everywhere.
And why exactly do all posts on here now look like quotes and the quotes like shouting?
ID: 1832778 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Alex Storey
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Jun 04
Posts: 1130
Credit: 1,958,979
RAC: 16
Greece
Message 1832784 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 3:18:05 UTC - in response to Message 1832726.  

Is that the 17" Galaxy S7?

;)
ID: 1832784 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
w1hueProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Aug 00
Posts: 69
Credit: 3,306,295
RAC: 2,813
United States
Message 1832799 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 3:59:27 UTC

Am I missing something, or is there no link back to the home page on the menu bar?

The server page is readable for me, but white lettering on light green is, well, kinda ugh. A darker background would be much better.
ID: 1832799 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
w1hueProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Aug 00
Posts: 69
Credit: 3,306,295
RAC: 2,813
United States
Message 1832801 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 4:10:50 UTC
Last modified: 27 Nov 2016, 4:11:51 UTC

I don't see any "settings" to turn off the green bar. And the "site search" is pretty useless -- same as before.
______________________________________________________________

"It is my belief we developed language because
of our deep inner need to complain" -- Lily Tomlin
ID: 1832801 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 16143
Credit: 2,226,106
RAC: 731
Ireland
Message 1832807 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 6:00:36 UTC

Change = good. Change for change's sake = bad.
ID: 1832807 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Wiggo "Socialist"
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 11738
Credit: 150,537,886
RAC: 110,617
Australia
Message 1832808 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 6:02:58 UTC

OMG! We've been hit now with a deformed font. :-(
ID: 1832808 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Sirius B
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Dec 00
Posts: 16143
Credit: 2,226,106
RAC: 731
Ireland
Message 1832816 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 7:27:52 UTC

With all the changes being made, surprised that one change that would greatly improve the forums has not been made...

... username <50.
ID: 1832816 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
kittymanProject Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 47650
Credit: 848,300,855
RAC: 130,769
United States
Message 1832818 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 8:17:20 UTC
Last modified: 27 Nov 2016, 8:34:41 UTC

Well, I see a few issues I raised earlier today have been fixed.....at least for now.
The current font is now quite readable against the slate background.
It would appear that quoted text is now displaying in a normal size....although the quote marker bars to the left are barely visible. A step in the right direction.
And multiple open tabs are now displaying the beginning of the name of the page they have open. Much more convenient!

Thank you for those improvements! Hope they remain, or at least are further tweaked in a manner that does not break them again.

Now, that would leave from my original list......
1. The reason that the way my sig displays has changed.
2. The navigation headings on the home page not responding to a mouse over.
And
3. Whatever is causing some posts to not text wrap correctly whist others do. I have yet to identify why one post with long sentences wraps and other posts have long sentences that run off the right side of the page. It could be the manner in which they are composed.
Maybe the ones that appear to be wrapping are done by using a return to start a new line and are not really wrapping at all.

At least it would appear that somebody is reading here and making an attempt at resolving some issues.
Thank you again.

Meow.
Always remember.....kitties are all Angels with fur.
'Cat lives matter.'

Have made friends in this life.
Most were cats.
ID: 1832818 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Richard HaselgroveProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 11226
Credit: 93,637,927
RAC: 51,228
United Kingdom
Message 1832821 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 9:39:07 UTC

Another glitch for the buglist. Some of the tabular data tables have mis-aligned column headers. It's most noticeable on

but that's not an exhaustive list.

ID: 1832821 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Jeff Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 00
Posts: 1031
Credit: 91,872,637
RAC: 192,145
United States
Message 1832879 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 17:16:40 UTC

This might be worth a read:
The Dos and Don’ts of Dark Web Design

Several things that struck me in that article include:
With a dark design comes less readability, less appeal for most readers and less opportunity for conventional design elements.
....
A recent poll suggests that light designs are preferred by the general web-going audience by a whopping 47%. The main reason is readability. Most people don’t like viewing light text against a dark background on websites because it strains their eyes, making for a much less enjoyable experience.

FWIW, I'm solidly in that 47%.

Also, most of the dark page examples shown are ones that are image-heavy, not text-heavy, like S@H.

And then there's:
Offer a Style Switcher

While we have many good practices at our disposal to make dark web designs more appealing, no amount of effort will satisfy every user.

Be sure to include a style switcher, so that users ultimately have the option of viewing dark text on a light background.

Two style sheets are required for this, one for the default dark layout, and one for the alternative light layout.

Just sayin'.......
ID: 1832879 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Richard HaselgroveProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 11226
Credit: 93,637,927
RAC: 51,228
United Kingdom
Message 1832883 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 18:00:32 UTC - in response to Message 1832879.  

Interesting, Jeff. It chimes with something I posted at BOINC today, which led to me to ponder the difference between website development and website design.

Many of the terms in that document are familiar to me from an early exposure to typography and hot-metal typesetting, but may be less familiar to those who approach websites from a development, coding, perspective. For example:

  • Kerning - the process of adjusting the spacing between characters, to the extent that part of one character in a movable-type font may literally overhang its neighbour.
  • leading - pronounced ledding, from the metal plumbers use - came from the physical strips of metallic lead placed between lines of type to increase inter-line spacing.

ID: 1832883 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Puss In Boots
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 15
Posts: 52
Credit: 129,375
RAC: 9
Mauritius
Message 1832892 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 20:03:20 UTC

A recent poll suggests that light designs are preferred by the general web-going audience by a whopping 47%

I read that as 53% don't, or aren't bothered. There is no mention of the ages polled. After the age of fifty, eyes will generally require more light than less so I see the reasoning behind providing an alternative for those users.

White website backgrounds do not give the same readability as black text on white paper. A better comparison would be reading text off a lit light bulb.

I like the changes.
ID: 1832892 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
kittymanProject Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 47650
Credit: 848,300,855
RAC: 130,769
United States
Message 1832893 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 20:05:42 UTC - in response to Message 1832892.  

A recent poll suggests that light designs are preferred by the general web-going audience by a whopping 47%

I read that as 53% don't, or aren't bothered. There is no mention of the ages polled. After the age of fifty, eyes will generally require more light than less so I see the reasoning behind providing an alternative for those users.

White website backgrounds do not give the same readability as black text on white paper. A better comparison would be reading text off a lit light bulb.

I like the changes.

Actually, I am finding, now that the font is nice and bright, the dark background is rather good on the eyes.
Always remember.....kitties are all Angels with fur.
'Cat lives matter.'

Have made friends in this life.
Most were cats.
ID: 1832893 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Jeff Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 11 Feb 00
Posts: 1031
Credit: 91,872,637
RAC: 192,145
United States
Message 1832895 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 20:20:29 UTC - in response to Message 1832892.  

I read that as 53% don't, or aren't bothered.

Well, that breakdown is actually:
...10% of those surveyed said that they always preferred dark backgrounds for websites, while another 36% said that the best choice would depend on the type of website.

Apparently only 7% just flat out didn't care. So, I guess it depends on what the "it depends" group's criteria is, which is unknown. My guess is that dark backgrounds are likely to be more acceptable on graphics-intensive sites than text-intensive ones. The article also states:
Generally speaking, dark works best for creative or elegant designs. For modern sleek websites, dark backgrounds add elegance.

Somehow, I don't see this site as needing much of either creativity or elegance. It's a site for presenting basic information in a textual format, not for dazzling visuals. "Readability" should be far and away the most compelling focus of any design decisions here.
ID: 1832895 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Profile Shaggie76Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Oct 09
Posts: 228
Credit: 48,915,588
RAC: 209,600
Canada
Message 1832896 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 20:28:43 UTC - in response to Message 1832879.  
Last modified: 27 Nov 2016, 20:28:55 UTC

A recent poll suggests that light designs are preferred by the general web-going audience by a whopping 47%. The main reason is readability. Most people don’t like viewing light text against a dark background on websites because it strains their eyes, making for a much less enjoyable experience.

I'm with you there -- I find the dark theme harder on my eyes and would very much appreciate an option for a more traditional coloring scheme.
ID: 1832896 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
kittymanProject Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 47650
Credit: 848,300,855
RAC: 130,769
United States
Message 1832899 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 20:34:28 UTC
Last modified: 27 Nov 2016, 20:39:32 UTC

And I think I 'may' have a small clue as to the text wrapping problem to offer.
I think this 'may' be related to the thread stretching problem we used to have with the old format, which was fixed. I believe it used to happen with oversized picture posts that would stretch the entire thread.

Notice the blue bar at the top of each thread in this current format. In threads where there are no non-wrapping posts, that blue bar stays within the screen, at the same width as it is over the forum thread index.
Now, when there posts running off of the right of the screen, that blue bar does also.

So, I think what we may actually have here is a thread stretching problem......that blue bar should never change in width and should remain the same at all times. It should not change the page width.
That blue bar should be the page format, a constant, and long sentences should be wrapped to conform to it, not stretch it.

This is just a theory, but the first thing I have been able to tie together with posts that do not wrap.

Meow?
Always remember.....kitties are all Angels with fur.
'Cat lives matter.'

Have made friends in this life.
Most were cats.
ID: 1832899 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Richard HaselgroveProject Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 11226
Credit: 93,637,927
RAC: 51,228
United Kingdom
Message 1832911 - Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 21:29:33 UTC - in response to Message 1832896.  

A recent poll suggests that light designs are preferred by the general web-going audience by a whopping 47%. The main reason is readability. Most people don’t like viewing light text against a dark background on websites because it strains their eyes, making for a much less enjoyable experience.
I'm with you there -- I find the dark theme harder on my eyes and would very much appreciate an option for a more traditional coloring scheme.
It probably also depends a lot on the quality of the monitor they own, and the ambient lighting in the room they're using it in.
ID: 1832911 · Report as offensive    Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 18 · Next

Message boards : News : Web site upgrade


 
©2017 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.