Message boards :
Number crunching :
Low RAC with GTX 1080
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
petri33 Send message Joined: 6 Jun 02 Posts: 1668 Credit: 623,086,772 RAC: 156 |
Thanks to petri33 who send me nicely its own binaries, my GTX 1080 rocks now ! Thank you for volunteering to test a Linux version. To overcome Heisenbergs: "You can't always get what you want / but if you try sometimes you just might find / you get what you need." -- Rolling Stones |
Urs Echternacht Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 692 Credit: 135,197,781 RAC: 211 |
And additional you could try to speed up your CPU a little by using MBv8_8.05r3345_avx_linux64_CPU.7z from lunatics. _\|/_ U r s |
M_M Send message Joined: 20 May 04 Posts: 76 Credit: 45,752,966 RAC: 8 |
Is there some similar Windows binary to test, I would gladly volunteer... ;) |
W3Perl Send message Joined: 29 Apr 99 Posts: 251 Credit: 3,696,783,867 RAC: 12,606 |
I'm using currently SSE4.2 . What is the difference between SSE4.2 and AVX ? Maybe a little help page from lunatics website would be helpful ;) |
Urs Echternacht Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 692 Credit: 135,197,781 RAC: 211 |
I'm using currently SSE4.2 . What is the difference between SSE4.2 and AVX ? Start reading from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIMD and use the included links to SSE4.x and AVX to gain the knowledge you want. (Maybe even available in your mother language) From lunatics side : AVX is more advanced vector extension and allows more data parallelism than SSE4.2, so it can crunch faster if the hardware supports it. Compare the SSE4.2 runtimes of your Ci7 6700 @ 4GHz to the AVX runtimes of my Ci5 6500T @2.8GHz (running on 3 of 4 cores) to get the idea how much faster it could be. _\|/_ U r s |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I'm using currently SSE4.2 . What is the difference between SSE4.2 and AVX ? With the Windows applications, huge, as we don't actually have a SSE4.2 application- it reverts back to SSSE3 (which is still pretty good). However the Lunatics Windows AVX application performs much better than the stock AVX application, which is better than the SSSE3 application. Grant Darwin NT |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
Raistmer has stated that lunatics AVX is 10% faster than stock AVX, he's the developer so me thinks he knows. |
W3Perl Send message Joined: 29 Apr 99 Posts: 251 Credit: 3,696,783,867 RAC: 12,606 |
ok thanks...I will switch to the avx binary so Thanks for the advice :) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.