Breaking News!

FBI reviewing new emails in Clinton probe

(CNN)FBI Director James Comey said Friday the bureau is reviewing new emails related to Hillary Clinton's time as secretary of state, according to a letter sent to eight congressional committee chairmen, a surprise development with 11 days until the election.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/28/politics/fbi-reviewing-new-emails-in-clinton-probe-director-tells-senate-judiciary-committee/index.html

---

LOLed after reading this YouTube comment so I thought I'd share:

"Either Warren or Sanders would have been mopping the floor with an orange mop..."

:)

Good googly moogly!

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

I wish a news channel would pop up and report all the events of the day *followed by a historical perspective.*

This OLD ANGRY DEPLORABLE IRREDEEMABLE GROPER has OANN and nMAX-One America News Network and News Max on Da Cable.

SOLID RIGHT WINGER Beauties wif Plenty of History Thrown In.

Poppin' Up Yap

---

I wish a news channel would pop up and report all the events of the day *followed by a historical perspective.*

I disconnected from all the cable news channels several months ago. They're all corrupt. They're all scratched records. They all are used to sway public opinion. None of them allow you to think for yourself anymore.

The final straw for me was Dana Perino (Bush 43's last press secretary) on Fox News and her initial response to Trump.

Same here.

Occasionally watch CNN and FOX. Just to confirm their very unprofessional bias hasn't changed.

---

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton

But as I pointed out are, or were, the evening presenters news reporters. Or are they just program presenters with no news background?

My quick check says that the Fox News ones are not, the other channels seem to indicate they have some news background.

Hannity for one is a major Trump supporter, and his chief TV presenter at this time.

edit] Name one other channel/program that has done live Trump interview in the last month.

The belief, regarding a difference between The Left/Liberal and Right/Conservative news Channels is incorrect.

The belief that Hannity Viewers are 'swayed' by him. Is also incorrect. They watch him because he confirms (to them) what they already believe.

This also applies to ALL News Media's and Commentators.

Again... Both Left and Right.

BTW: I can't stand Whining Hannity.

---

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton

But as I pointed out are, or were, the evening presenters news reporters. Or are they just program presenters with no news background?

My quick check says that the Fox News ones are not, the other channels seem to indicate they have some news background.

Hannity for one is a major Trump supporter, and his chief TV presenter at this time.

edit] Name one other channel/program that has done live Trump interview in the last month.

---

Gerrymandered is perfectly fine as long as it favors democrats.

If Trump takes the white house, the democrats will blame gerrymandering.

Well that would be pretty dumb. As most states operate a winner takes all when it comes to the electoral college, and this is based on total votes cast in the state, gerrymandering does not impact the presidential election to any significant degree. Likewise, gerrymandering does not affect composition of the Senate.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

I don't think elections are rigged,but I do think the voters are manipulated by the press.

From what others have said, you need to tell us which press people you believe are influencing the election.

Newspaper sales are almost non-existent. They have moved to the Web. Many of those are behind paywalls.

Then there are the TV News stations, the most popular being Fox.
Assuming that most of the population that watches these channels is a working person. For the majority their viewing will be in the evening. How many of the evening programs are news and presented by news journalists?

As the most popular of these channels is Fox and Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.

Are you saying that these two die-hard Trump supporters are manipulating the voters?

WinterKnight...

"Fox News has now finished No. 1 in primetime for 10 out of the last 11 weeks, averaging 2.14 million viewers for the week of August 15-21. MSNBC averaged 1.06 million primetime viewers and CNN averaged 746,000."

http://www.thewrap.com/cable-ratings-fox-news-beats-cnn-and-msnbc-combined-in-primetime/

Therefore... The Two Left of Center Cable News Networks (CNN/MSNBC) have basically the same viewership as the Right of Center (FOX).

You will have to rethink your belief regarding who has the most influence in Cable News.

---

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton

I don't think elections are rigged,but I do think the voters are manipulated by the press.

From what others have said, you need to tell us which press people you believe are influencing the election.

Newspaper sales are almost non-existent. They have moved to the Web. Many of those are behind paywalls.

Then there are the TV News stations, the most popular being Fox.
Assuming that most of the population that watches these channels is a working person. For the majority their viewing will be in the evening. How many of the evening programs are news and presented by news journalists?

As the most popular of these channels is Fox and Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity.

Are you saying that these two die-hard Trump supporters are manipulating the voters?

---

I don't think elections are rigged,but I do think the voters are manipulated by the press.

---

Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.

Gerrymandered is perfectly fine as long as it favors democrats.

If Trump takes the white house, the democrats will blame gerrymandering.

Or Mollycoddling and Lickspitle Pandering...........there's always something brewing as a vast right wing conspiracy......":D

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

If that felon, clinton, loses, her party is going to claim voter fraud every where.

There's no evidence of voter fraud as long as the democrats are winning.

edit: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-23/new-podesta-email-exposes-dem-playbook-rigging-polls-through-oversamples

Karl Rove discusses Republican election fraud plan.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Trump suggests voter fraud might not be so bad after all,

Starting to think as a Democrat?

Starting? He is one and has been for life!

:-) :-) :-)

---

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton

Trump suggests voter fraud might not be so bad after all,

Starting to think as a Democrat?

Starting? He is one and has been for life!

---

Trump suggests voter fraud might not be so bad after all,

Starting to think as a Democrat?

---

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton