Here's a catchy little campaign song I was just sent.....lots of reality in a 4 minute tune.


https://safeshare.tv/x/kXjbXGyQDsE

Oh, and so true.

Meow.

---

"Learn from yesterday. Live for today. Hope for tomorrow." Albert Einstein
"With cats." kittyman

Here's a catchy little campaign song I was just sent.....lots of reality in a 4 minute tune.


https://safeshare.tv/x/kXjbXGyQDsE

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Clinton is going to win with supporters like this:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/omg-leftist-mob-beats-kicks-pummels-trump-supporter-wearing-maga-hat-saved-police-caught-video/

..........Flying Monkeys..........

Where is the outrage from Hillary, and The Political/Media Establishment?

This, and other Anti-Trump/Pro-Hillary Thuggery. Will result, because of the disgust of The Goons on The Left. In a Trump Victory.

---

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton

The IRS and other non-defense-related federal agencies are stockpiling firearms and ammunition... but they're ready to force gun reforms on the American people

You don't know thae answer ??? 4t you would do , but i'll tell you and there's plenty of clips / doco's on you tube to back this up ;-) ( all 100% "reliable" P.M.S.L ;-) )

It's coz Mcdonnalds , Haliburton , the Reptillian's and the New World Order are planning the takeover of the workd starting with the U.S.A .

Surprised you did'nt know coz you seem to be so "knowlegable" or is that opinionated ?? let you decide that ;-)

---

Life is what you make of it :-)

When i'm good i'm very good , but when i'm bad i'm shi#eloads better ;-) In't I " buttercups " p.m.s.l at authoritie !!;-)

Clinton is going to win with supporters like this:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/omg-leftist-mob-beats-kicks-pummels-trump-supporter-wearing-maga-hat-saved-police-caught-video/

..........Flying Monkeys..........

---

"Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)>

Qay I see it: we've had supply side economics, with just slightly higher corporate taxes during the neo-liberal years.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

I suspect there are very few economists that advocate a return to demand-side for this very reason.

Robert Reich, Elizabeth Warren, Janet Yellen?

Doh! I meant a return to supply-side. P

Must read before hitting "post reply" button.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

I suspect there are very few economists that advocate a return to demand-side for this very reason.

Robert Reich, Elizabeth Warren, Janet Yellen?

---

And nobody's getting the whole truth about the Ronald Reagan administration and the Democratic Congress of the time.

I give up.

Right, since the democrats were in control they deserve all the credit for all the good that happened while Reagan was in office!
See how blind hate works

All Reagan really cared about. Was destroying Communism. Starting with The Soviet Union.

He did hasten their inevitable collapse.

---

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
--- George Santayana

Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
--- Lord Acton

Supply-side economics didn't fail. It NEVER GOT completely enacted.

There was no demand-side economics prior to Keynes, and Keynes didn't start influencing US economics until FDR. The Great Depression was the result of supply-side economics. Tried and failed, abysmally. I suspect there are very few economists that advocate a return to demand-side for this very reason.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

(government spending cuts)

Ah, yes, Republican Military Spending Pork Barrels! :)

---

And nobody's getting the whole truth about the Ronald Reagan administration and the Democratic Congress of the time.

I give up.

Right, since the democrats were in control they deserve all the credit for all the good that happened while Reagan was in office!
See how blind hate works

---

Clinton is going to win with supporters like this:

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/09/omg-leftist-mob-beats-kicks-pummels-trump-supporter-wearing-maga-hat-saved-police-caught-video/

And nobody's getting the whole truth about the Ronald Reagan administration and the Democratic Congress of the time.

I give up.

Oh, I know the truth about what went on during this time. Various friends in high (or low, depending on your point of view) places. Most people don't understand.

The Democrats allowed the tax cut portion of Reagan's programs to go through, knowing it was popular and also knowing that his program would fail without the more important rest (government spending cuts) of it getting enacted therefore could be used to discredit Reagan, Republican Party, and conservatism and/or limited Government in general. They won that hand of Political Poker.

Demand-side economics is a total, abject failure.

Supply-side economics didn't fail. It NEVER GOT completely enacted.

Reagan had the correct idea. He just didn't have the 'stones' to get it done. He COULD have, like the occasional State Governor, done it by vetoing everything that came across his desk that didn't match his program. He did not. He was too willing to compromise on principle. It is the main reason I wound up leaving the Republican Party back in the mid-late 1980's.

---

https://youtu.be/iY57ErBkFFE

#Texit

Don't blame me, I voted for Johnson(L) in 2016.

Truth is dangerous... especially when it challenges those in power.

unless we can have an extreme miracle

We could always send Boris J ( our foreign sec ) he was born in New york or somewhere over there so he could be your president / cic

Uhh... If he was in fact born in NYC, and if the rest of the requirements for 'natural born' citizen were satisfied, he would STILL have to reside in the USA for 14 years to become eligible to be President.

US Constitution. Article II, Section 1, Clause 5...

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

---

https://youtu.be/iY57ErBkFFE

#Texit

Don't blame me, I voted for Johnson(L) in 2016.

Truth is dangerous... especially when it challenges those in power.

Did Guy SERIOUSLY try to go there with that one?
Wow.
Don't tell me about blurring lines.

Yes he did. Seems his world view is ...

---

unless we can have an extreme miracle

We could always send Boris J ( our foreign sec ) he was born in New york or somewhere over there so he could be your president / cic

---

Life is what you make of it :-)

When i'm good i'm very good , but when i'm bad i'm shi#eloads better ;-) In't I " buttercups " p.m.s.l at authoritie !!;-)

Sarge,

When you say, "Wahhabism: How Saudi Arabia Exports Ultra-Conservative Islam," you are adding to the confusion of the symbols we use to communicate.

You should at least add some sort of caveat to that statement.

Because I say I'm conservative, many people will now think that I want to oppress women, execute people for the crime of being homosexual, and chop the hands off thieves.

No, they will think you want to jail people for 50 years for smoking some weed, jail them for burning a flag, jail them for doing any work on Sunday, refuse trans people a restroom, bar all knowledge of contraception ... execute, yes you are in favor of capital punishment, just not pubic where the people might see it and rise up against you.

bobby,

Look at the history of the democrat party.

Let's. Until the 1960's all the southern states were rabid democrat. Then in the late 60's the Democrats dropped their racism and George Wallace broke off the DixieCrats from the Democrats. By the 1990's all of those racists had left the Democrats forever and joined the Republicans, calling themselves TEA. They had to have some place to spread their racist filth.

They are the ones who who didn't want to free the slaves. They are the ones who had to be defeated in our civil war. And they are the ones who wrote the Jim Crow laws.

Did Guy SERIOUSLY try to go there with that one?
Wow.
Don't tell me about blurring lines.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.