GPU FLOPS: Theory vs Reality
Message boards :
Number crunching :
GPU FLOPS: Theory vs Reality
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Keith Myers   Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 
 |
They will also send you thermal pads that the user has to applied to both the VRAM and the VRMs.. I'm waiting on them to send me both before I tear mine apart to place these on there. Or if you don't feel comfortable doing your own surgery, you can RMA them with a cross-ship. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours   A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) ID: 1829102 ·  |
Jimbocous   Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 1853 Credit: 268,616,081 RAC: 1,349
|
Used 980s are getting awfully cheap on eBay ... Wish I had more slots, and more power ...  
ID: 1829107 · |
Zalster  Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242
|
They will also send you thermal pads that the user has to applied to both the VRAM and the VRMs.. I'm waiting on them to send me both before I tear mine apart to place these on there. Actually they will only ship vbios changes cards, possibly refurbished ones, but none with thermal pads. In their opinion, they don't see a need for the pads :( This from their forum bulletin boards and their reps there. But I have no problem taking apart the cards. I've already done it for about 10 cards the 980, 980tis, Titan Xs, 1080. Seen the pdfs on it and have a plan to hybrid these bad boys which should actually make them better cooling efficient..  
ID: 1829118 · |
|
W3Perl Send message Joined: 29 Apr 99 Posts: 251 Credit: 3,696,783,867 RAC: 12,606 
|
Would it be possible to update your credit/hour graph to include GTX 1050 / GTX 1050 Ti ? Thanks 
ID: 1831790 · |
Shaggie76  Send message Joined: 9 Oct 09 Posts: 282 Credit: 271,858,118 RAC: 196 
|
Would it be possible to update your credit/hour graph to include GTX 1050 / GTX 1050 Ti ? Yeah I was waiting for the servers to stabilize before I put the stress of a scan on them. Maybe next weekend if things clear up. ID: 1831797 · |
|
Shaggie76 Send message Joined: 9 Oct 09 Posts: 282 Credit: 271,858,118 RAC: 196
|
Last night's scan; new this week is the 1050 Ti's but there aren't enough regular 1050's yet.  ID: 1832301 · |
jason_gee  Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 
|
Nice!, can vouch my house is substantially cooler switching for development to a single 1050ti. Having been digging, I'd pin the more or less equivalent Credit/Wh of the top four or five, on the appropriate graph, as intentional. The wider variance on the 1050ti in particular I would tend to blame on the recent driver bloat/crud, which requires manual intervention to deal with. "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. ID: 1832319 · |
|
Shaggie76 Send message Joined: 9 Oct 09 Posts: 282 Credit: 271,858,118 RAC: 196
|
An updated scan with this week's data: still no regular 1050's strangely   ID: 1834144 · |
|
Shaggie76 Send message Joined: 9 Oct 09 Posts: 282 Credit: 271,858,118 RAC: 196
|
It's been a while since I last compared the rate of data between the two telescopes so I graphed it up from the latest scan; it seems like GBT data is being processed considerably faster with 8.19!  ID: 1834157 · |
|
Shaggie76 Send message Joined: 9 Oct 09 Posts: 282 Credit: 271,858,118 RAC: 196
|
Having waited hopefully long enough for people to upgrade to BOINC 7.6.33 (which has more granular OpenCL device ID for AMD parts) I ran another scan; it's still a bit general for some parts (eg AMD Radeon R7 200 Series which includes a bunch of cards) but it is now able to discriminate RX480's from RX470's etc (sadly there aren't quite enough 470 or 460 parts to qualify yet). I was also asked privately about GTX 1050 vs GTX 1050Ti; again I have some data but there aren't enough regular 1050's to have them show up on the chart (there's maybe 5x the 1050 Ti's in my scan). The unwinsorized mean credit/hr for the regular 1050 was 404 cr/hr and the 1050 Ti was 423 cr/hr so the difference is marginal.  ID: 1840633 · |
Wiggo  Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489
|
Well I certainly can't complain about the performance of my 4 GTX 1060 3B in my 2 rigs. :-D Cheers. ID: 1847195 · |
|
KLiK Send message Joined: 31 Mar 14 Posts: 1304 Credit: 22,994,597 RAC: 60 
|
Why no 1050Ti? Got one on my computer & one on Stephen's... ;)   non-profit org. Play4Life in Zagreb, Croatia, EU ID: 1847291 · |
|
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13736 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304
|
Why no 1050Ti? Jan 7th. I was also asked privately about GTX 1050 vs GTX 1050Ti; again I have some data but there aren't enough regular 1050's to have them show up on the chart Grant Darwin NT ID: 1847294 · |
HAL9000  Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57
|
Why no 1050Ti? The most recent data does show the 1050 Ti. I would guess that since the 1050's were released in 2016 October is the reason they don't show up in 2016 July data. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours  Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1847329 · |
Kissagogo27   Send message Joined: 6 Nov 99 Posts: 716 Credit: 8,032,827 RAC: 62
|
^hi all, just seen something strange in my results Boinc self determine théorical Gflop to my GPU ( HD7750 ) a 2048 Gflop, , on technical websites and wiki , the value is about 819 Gflops ... but now on somme task , it set to 2304 Gflops , is it self calculated with time by result ? look at theses .. http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5423626195 >2048 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5516955845 >2304 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5514924288 >2048 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=5522146789 >2304 thks for your thoughts ... ID: 1850172 · |
|
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57
|
^hi all, just seen something strange in my results As I recall BOINC always reported the GFLOPs of all of my older CAL Radeon GPUs as double the actual value. It probably has something to do with them having issues with the GPU detection using CAL. For the numbers you are seeing you are seeing I would guess your GPU is running 1000MHz base and then 1125MHz for turbo? SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1850309 · |
|
Kissagogo27 Send message Joined: 6 Nov 99 Posts: 716 Credit: 8,032,827 RAC: 62
|
GPU is already Oced at max 900Mhz without turbo possibility ;) ID: 1850592 · |
|
Shaggie76 Send message Joined: 9 Oct 09 Posts: 282 Credit: 271,858,118 RAC: 196
|
More people have upgraded BOINC and snapped up the new fancy cards so I ran another scan; this time there was enough data for 1050 vs 1050Ti and the RX 400 series is starting to show up:   ID: 1856948 · |
|
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873
|
I like where the 1050Ti slots right underneath the 1070 for efficiency. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) ID: 1856950 · |
|
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0
|
Hmm, I suppose if there are ever enough 1080ti's then they might edge out top spot. Well out of my pricerange though. Could probably retire most of my machines and just beef up the Mac Pro for virtualisation.... hmmm "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. ID: 1856954 · |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.