Message boards :
Number crunching :
Open Beta test: SoG for NVidia, Lunatics v0.45 - Beta6 (RC again)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 25 · 26 · 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 . . . 32 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
I just installed Beta 6 and checked for the affinity issue noticed when troubleshooting my Penta-Nano system. Not sure if an attempt was made to fix it, but it looks like it is still an issue. One of the 5 running MB tasks has affinity set to all cores, while the other 4 are set to unique cores. This isn't really an installation question, more a question about the application payload. Please contact Raistmer about this sort of question, citing OpenCL version by Raistmer, r3557 |
RueiKe Send message Joined: 14 Feb 16 Posts: 492 Credit: 378,512,430 RAC: 785 |
I just installed Beta 6 and checked for the affinity issue noticed when troubleshooting my Penta-Nano system. Not sure if an attempt was made to fix it, but it looks like it is still an issue. One of the 5 running MB tasks has affinity set to all cores, while the other 4 are set to unique cores. Thanks. I will PM him. GitHub: Ricks-Lab Instagram: ricks_labs |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
I just installed Beta 6 and checked for the affinity issue noticed when troubleshooting my Penta-Nano system. Not sure if an attempt was made to fix it, but it looks like it is still an issue. One of the 5 running MB tasks has affinity set to all cores, while the other 4 are set to unique cores. Is it the same issue you were discussing in this thread? SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
RueiKe Send message Joined: 14 Feb 16 Posts: 492 Credit: 378,512,430 RAC: 785 |
I just installed Beta 6 and checked for the affinity issue noticed when troubleshooting my Penta-Nano system. Not sure if an attempt was made to fix it, but it looks like it is still an issue. One of the 5 running MB tasks has affinity set to all cores, while the other 4 are set to unique cores. Yes, it is an issue but not the cause of the problem on my system. GitHub: Ricks-Lab Instagram: ricks_labs |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
I just installed Beta 6 and checked for the affinity issue noticed when troubleshooting my Penta-Nano system. Not sure if an attempt was made to fix it, but it looks like it is still an issue. One of the 5 running MB tasks has affinity set to all cores, while the other 4 are set to unique cores. . . Perhaps just write a message listing your problem in the V8.20 support thread. He checks in there regularly. Stephen . |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
. . @ Richard Hasselgrove . . I was wondering, is it at all likely there will ever be support for SSE4.1 in Lunatics? Stephen . |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
. . @ Richard Hasselgrove That depends if a volunteer with the skills to drive GCC 4.7.1 with aggressive optimization settings puts themselves forward to replace Joe Segur. |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
. . @ Richard Hasselgrove . . Hi Richard, . . 'nuff said! Stephen . |
BilBg Send message Joined: 27 May 07 Posts: 3720 Credit: 9,385,827 RAC: 0 |
BOINC quirk: Despite you put at the top (in MB8_win_x86_SSE2_OpenCL_ATi_HD5.aistub): <app_version> <app_name>setiathome_v8</app_name> <version_num>819</version_num> <api_version>7.5.0</api_version> <avg_ncpus>0.04</avg_ncpus> <max_ncpus>0.2</max_ncpus> <plan_class>opencl_ati5_sah</plan_class> ... the new downloaded tasks were labelled: <version_num>820</version_num> <plan_class>opencl_ati5_sah</plan_class> (transition from Lunatics_Win32_v0.45_Beta4 to Beta6) BOINC 6.10.58 decided to sort by version_num and choose the highest? Â - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :) Â |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51478 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Has work on the new installer totally stalled out? Meow? "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Has work on the new installer totally stalled out?Read the threads about memory leaks (possibly) with the ATi_HD5 apps. I can't stabilise an installer until Raistmer stabilises his apps. |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51478 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Has work on the new installer totally stalled out?Read the threads about memory leaks (possibly) with the ATi_HD5 apps. I can't stabilise an installer until Raistmer stabilises his apps. Would it be unrealistic to ask for an interim installer with the nVidia apps? That is all the kitties have online. I am sure it would be an extra bother, but with the ATI stuff holding the good apps hostage, I have to ask. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
UniMatrixZ Send message Joined: 2 Feb 01 Posts: 102 Credit: 30,826,065 RAC: 3 |
I run the r3571 build on my 7850 card (and also on my NV cards), I can't say it uses any more RAM then the r3557 build. But I guess that it can be different from system to system. Otherwise why not buy more RAM( ironic) If you guys wanna try another build here is a link to r3578 ( I can't find the link to r3571 build) https://cloud.mail.ru/public/AeMs/SYvE7Eiei You just need to edit the app_info.xml to the r3578 build, and of course copy the new r3578 build files and .cl file to BOINC data directory. Cheers! "SETI is probably the most important quest of our time, and it amazes me that governments and corporations are not supporting it sufficiently."- Arthur C. Clarke 2006 |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Read the threads about memory leaks (possibly) with the ATi_HD5 apps. I can't stabilise an installer until Raistmer stabilises his apps. Current ones still RC. RAM usage differs hugely between different setups that looks much more like driver issue (some drivers backup at least part of GPU memory allocations with host memory). Will see how latest one differs from those RC (still did not get report). SETI apps news We're not gonna fight them. We're gonna transcend them. |
Mike Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34378 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80 |
I also see no extended RAM usage with new apps. We only have one host so far i know. Will test more during the weekend. With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
I ran a whole bunch under the current build back when it first came out. Been a while but all the results are there. No unusual RAM usage with the NVIDIA version |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
My rig running R3557 seems OK to me.You're right, r3557 was an improvement on what had gone before. But r3571 is better. The question now is whether r3578 is better than r3571 for either ATi, NVidia, both, or neither. And whether r3581 is better for ATi. And whether SoG for ATi is back in the picture, having been ruled out a few builds ago. And so the circle turns. |
RueiKe Send message Joined: 14 Feb 16 Posts: 492 Credit: 378,512,430 RAC: 785 |
Read the threads about memory leaks (possibly) with the ATi_HD5 apps. I can't stabilise an installer until Raistmer stabilises his apps. Let me know if there is anything you want me to test or beta release on my system. GitHub: Ricks-Lab Instagram: ricks_labs |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
I have two systems that are downloading and labeling work 8.20 also. I haven't figured out how. The other system is still downloading and labeling work as 8.19. All systems have identical app_info files. The app version sections at the beginning of the MB GPU section have both 8.19 and 8.20 version numbers listed for the same plan_class. I don't know how the servers decides to label identical GPU tasks 8.20 on two systems but 8.19 on the other. I used the latest Beta6 Lunatics installer on all systems and selected exactly the same choices for apps. No real problems with the labeling except for messy task ordering in BoincTasks. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
I have two systems that are downloading and labeling work 8.20 also. I haven't figured out how. The other system is still downloading and labeling work as 8.19. All systems have identical app_info files. The app version sections at the beginning of the MB GPU section have both 8.19 and 8.20 version numbers listed for the same plan_class. I don't know how the servers decides to label identical GPU tasks 8.20 on two systems but 8.19 on the other. I used the latest Beta6 Lunatics installer on all systems and selected exactly the same choices for apps. No real problems with the labeling except for messy task ordering in BoincTasks. . . Have you had a peek in the Slot folders for the GPU tasks to check what revision of the app is actually running on all machines? Stephen . |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.