observation about windows 10

Message boards : Number crunching : observation about windows 10
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Gerry

Send message
Joined: 29 May 15
Posts: 84
Credit: 4,956,983
RAC: 0
Switzerland
Message 1706940 - Posted: 31 Jul 2015, 10:34:03 UTC

i did a clean install of win10 yesterday,since seti restarted today it seems my 290x is processing about twice as fast as before,finishing the tasks in half the time. just found it interesting..
ID: 1706940 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1706969 - Posted: 31 Jul 2015, 13:02:32 UTC - in response to Message 1706940.  
Last modified: 31 Jul 2015, 13:05:21 UTC

i did a clean install of win10 yesterday,since seti restarted today it seems my 290x is processing about twice as fast as before,finishing the tasks in half the time. just found it interesting..

The work sent out isn't always the same. Some of it takes longer, VLAR tasks, or some of it takes much less time, VHAR tasks. A normal angle range(AR) is ~0.42 with values that deviate much higher being refereed to as VHAR(very high angle range), about 1.127 & higher, & those that are much below VLAR(very low angle range), about 0.30 & lower. Unfortunately your speed increase looks to be due to completing shorter tasks than it was doing previously.

If you look at a completed MB result you can look for the line that says WU true angle range is :.

For a completed Astropulse task you can look for the line that says percent blanked:. Where a high percentage of blanking mean there was not a lot of work to do in that task.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1706969 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34258
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1706973 - Posted: 31 Jul 2015, 13:29:35 UTC

Your crunching times are quite similar.

496 seconds with win 10 for AR 0.42 and 505 seconds before also AR 0.42.


With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1706973 · Report as offensive
Profile Amtronic
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 Jun 06
Posts: 51
Credit: 1,374,701
RAC: 4
United States
Message 1707343 - Posted: 1 Aug 2015, 15:05:19 UTC - in response to Message 1706973.  

Did a memory upgrade to 16gig, installed Win10, and BOINC + SETI is running noticeably faster.

.
Helping where I can. Hindering everywhere else.
ID: 1707343 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13736
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1707447 - Posted: 1 Aug 2015, 22:29:37 UTC - in response to Message 1707343.  

Did a memory upgrade to 16gig, installed Win10, and BOINC + SETI is running noticeably faster.

Unless you previously had 2GB or less of RAM, the response would be the same as HAL9000s to the opening poster.
Not all WUs have the same run times. Going from Win7/8 whatever to Win10 for systems that have sufficient system resources (eg RAM), and going to Win10 doesn't result in the disabling/removal of some system resource hogging software, there have been no significant changes in crunching times between the Operating Systems.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1707447 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : observation about windows 10


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.