Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (99) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
I guess you could say we've got 99 problems, but a server ain't one... right now. By saying that I know I just jinxed things. Sorry about that. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14617 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
Pulling forward Cosmic_Ocean's post from PMO 98: we're getting closer to another new milestone of sorts. 2^32 tasks. David says The conversion hadn't been done, but we'll do it. Take a bow, Cosmic. |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
Pulling forward Cosmic_Ocean's post from PMO 98: Yay! I contributed something other than the occasional rant and CPU time. :) Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 19 May 99 Posts: 209 Credit: 10,924,287 RAC: 29 ![]() ![]() |
Is this anything like '99 beers on the wall' ? Don't kill the messenger !!!! Bob SETI@home classic workunits.....4,321 SETI@home classic CPU time......22,169 hours Sometimes I wonder, what happened to all the people I gave directions to? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SETI@home classic workunits 4,321 SETI@home classic CPU time 22,169 hours |
woohoo Send message Joined: 30 Oct 13 Posts: 972 Credit: 165,671,404 RAC: 5 ![]() |
if only the forum had music |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Are we there yet ? "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14617 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Are we there yet ? Oh crumbs *clenches butt cheeks* "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 ![]() |
Oh crumbs *clenches butt cheeks* No need yet. Start doing that Tuesday, when apparently these fixes are going to be introduced here. It was nice knowing you all... rereg here we come. :P I've tested this locally, and we'll deploy it on SETI@home next week. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Oh crumbs *clenches butt cheeks* Thanks Jord, glad to have corresponded with a fellow dutchman (even though I don't speak the language) "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14617 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
Yay! I contributed something other than the occasional rant and CPU time. :) Yes - I think you contributed two sleepless weekends in serverland (Eric didn't sound too chuffed in email, either). But at least they got time to plan and worry about it. Otherwise, I suspect we'd all have been saying our goodbyes around this time next Friday - and heaven knows how long it would have taken to work out why. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yay! I contributed something other than the occasional rant and CPU time. :) FWIW I would classify Eric's response as measured to the target, but suspect he would have royally chucked a wobbly if there was a physical meeting. Kudos to virtual meetings for preventing violence, "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30358 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
Oh crumbs *clenches butt cheeks* Since it sounds like next Tuesday may be a long outage, let me remind people that while the project is down you can come over to http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=8105 and cry in your beer waiting for there to be more work units. ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 ![]() ![]() |
Beta is down :( and just as I started to test something, lol edit.. an no, I didn't break it thank you!! |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
Beta is down :( and just as I started to test something, lol The might be implementing the database change at Beta first to make sure it will work here next week. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 25 Dec 00 Posts: 30358 Credit: 53,134,872 RAC: 32 ![]() ![]() |
Beta is down :( and just as I started to test something, lol Up now. ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 ![]() ![]() |
Seem like there are some 2 and 3rd run APs slowly making their way into the system. Been a good day for me, about 20 or so across all my computers. ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 20 Dec 05 Posts: 3187 Credit: 57,163,290 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Not really a server problem, nor is it something to go into "Panic Mode" about, but GPU tasks used to be separate from the CPU tasks when calculating your limit for "Tasks" - and now (apparently...) they aren't... . ![]() Hello, from Albany, CA!... |
OTS Send message Joined: 6 Jan 08 Posts: 369 Credit: 20,533,537 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Not really a server problem, nor is it something to go into "Panic Mode" about, but GPU tasks used to be separate from the CPU tasks when calculating your limit for "Tasks" - and now (apparently...) they aren't... I cannot tell that from looking at my cruncher. I have been keeping the count low to have room for APs if they became available but increased the number of days work to keep in my local queue to test what you said. In the last half hour I have downloaded enough WUs so that I now have 100 CPU tasks and 100 GPU tasks. These are the same limits that have been around for a long time. Below are the times when I received the downloads so it appears that the large RTS figure might not be indicative of what the SETI server is doing. 26-Jul-2015 19:24:06 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 49 new tasks 26-Jul-2015 19:29:09 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 2 new tasks 26-Jul-2015 19:34:13 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 10 new tasks 26-Jul-2015 19:39:21 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 26-Jul-2015 19:44:29 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 4 new tasks 26-Jul-2015 19:49:38 [SETI@home] Scheduler request completed: got 26 new tasks Times are EDST (East Coast USA) Edit: I just noticed the first downloads were mostly vlars so perhaps there were not any WUs immediately available for the GPU after the CPU queue was full. |
©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.