Sarge Ted Cruz is a republican .

I looked up what you meant by theocracy as I had not herd that before and I think , mmmm

What does it say on the wall behind the speakers chair in the Congress ?

"In God We Trust" makes me think your country already crossed that line of Theocracy a long time ago so Cruz is just being that trusting god.

I'm not surprised anyway , Republicans !!! or Tea party

Liberals here (Republican) win election and in there first budget give the catholic church $250 mill to teach religion in all schools.

I though the church was not to charge for teaching the gospel ???

Not that the Australian Tea Party the Liberal National Party gave one thought about giving the church 1/4 billion dollars.

Republicans no matter what country are the same . so use you head and figure out that you don't vote for them . Leopards don't change there spots

---

My choice, in order (as of today).

#1 - John Kasich... Centrist and successful Governor.

#2 - Marco Rubio... But dropping fast.

#3 - Bernie Sanders... With the proviso that the Congress is controlled by the Republicans.

Not trolling you Clyde, this is an honest question:

Is it really possible to like both Rubio and Sanders? I mean, the main things Sanders wants to change, are the things Rubio wants more of.

PS I'm a bit ashamed to say I've never heard the name John Kasich

...
The age of the Zodiac Killer would ne, at a fair minimum, 65 years. Cruz is around the age of you and I, Es...

How do you know how old he is?

Have you seen his birth certificate?

Had no reason to believe otherwise, but now this ceritifies I was correct about Cruz's age range.



The Zodiac Killer's killing spree began before Ted was born, unless Ted is a time-travelling Teddy ... errr, Freddy Krueger.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

...
The age of the Zodiac Killer would ne, at a fair minimum, 65 years. Cruz is around the age of you and I, Es...

How do you know how old he is?






Have you seen his birth certificate?

---

Reality Internet Personality

So, it looks like Trump is leading by double digits in Florida currently.
But that's among those interested in voting in a Republican primary.
Half asleep during 30 minute news tonight, but I could swear I heard, at the same time Florida in general would be 60-70% scared or angry if Trump ends up the nominee? Did I hear right? I am trying to find more info on that poll.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

One more chink in the armor of Trump, along with hiring of foreign workers.

Poll: Nearly 40 Percent of Florida Voters Think Ted Cruz Might Be the Zodiac Killer

I believe it.

Ridiculous.
The age of the Zodiac Killer would ne, at a fair minimum, 65 years. Cruz is around the age of you and I, Es.

Here's a good reason to be concerned about Cruz. And Rubio. Even for Christians, because their brand of Christianity could be the "wrong" denomination.

Cruz = Theocrat?

Rubio = Theocrat?

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

I question what happens when there are reactions to more than 1 vaccine and weather this is causeing the Autism .

All the available evidence suggests there is no link between vaccinations and autism. This is one of the most dangerous and sickening myths to have arisen over the past 10 to 15 years. The myth needs to be consigned to history. The former physician who started it been discredited and struck off the register of physicians by his governing body. That Trump perpetuates this myth makes it relevant to this thread.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Poll: Nearly 40 Percent of Florida Voters Think Ted Cruz Might Be the Zodiac Killer



I believe it.

---

Reality Internet Personality

...

Vaccines do cause allergic reactions in many people and normally given 1 at a time the reaction is minor I question what happens when there are reactions to more than 1 vaccine and weather this is causeing the Autism .
...

Its not. I hope that clears this up for you.

---

Reality Internet Personality

Bobby what I'm talking about is the fact I believe after seeing a show about this in America that to many to soon is simply the number given I believe it's 3 months between certain vaccines .

When I was a kid I had the shots but I'm shore we where only given 2 or 3 not the amount they do now and some are not needed till later when they are young adults or in there teens .

I'm not saying people should not vaccinate there kids they should but I don't think they should be given they way they are 3 vaccines in 1 shot .

1 shot wait 4 weeks then give the next one not 3 at once or more .

Vaccines do cause allergic reactions in many people and normally given 1 at a time the reaction is minor I question what happens when there are reactions to more than 1 vaccine and weather this is causeing the Autism .

Vaccinate yes but I do believe they need to be given 1 at a time and with 4 weeks break between not the current system of give the kid all the shots at once and then follow it up 18 months later and all because people don't have time . Make time fer gowd sake . anyway we are off topic hear so maybe a new thread about this you may put up Bobby

---

I think the big problem with it thou is giving to many in a short time when young kids have not developed a immune system that can handle so many vaccines given so quickly

Sources please. To the best of my knowledge, vaccines are not given in a "too many too soon" manner.

I wouldn't say that it's "all that quick" personally as my 3 2nd generation kids went through the NSW Immunisation Schedule (they're 20-23.5 now) and it did them no harm (except for the needle pricks), also I was the parent that took them to have it all done (their mother couldn't do it) so that's my input on the subject (better off having safe kids). ;-)

Cheers.

1) Point out that he's not making any sense on whatever subject and you're a communist. I have no problem calling this guy an idiot, and if POTUS I'll still be calling him an idiot. But I'd rather not be calling the President an idiot if you know what I mean.

Put another way, the USA was born of a protest.
No person is perfect.
So no president can be perfect.
Given that mistakes will be made, does Mark or anyone else want to be the one to feel the wrath for pointing one out?

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

I think the big problem with it thou is giving to many in a short time when young kids have not developed a immune system that can handle so many vaccines given so quickly

Sources please. To the best of my knowledge, vaccines are not given in a "too many too soon" manner.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Bobby after reading the article I can see where your coming from as a doctor he should just explain that things like Human Papillomavirus is a vaccine that only girls need and they only need that one once they are about 11 or entering puberty and the same for boys although it not a big concern for men .We found and came up with the vaccine for it girls are given it when they are about 12 years old here not as baby's or children but as teenagers.

As for hepatitis well unless your a junky again this one's not needed till you are a young adult at the earliest

Type b Flu and normal flu maybe that one and as for the others in the article they all sound ok .

I think the big problem with it thou is giving to many in a short time when young kids have not developed a immune system that can handle so many vaccines given so quickly

And as a doc he could have said words to that effect

---

Most of the reasons Trump is trolling the heck out of us have already been mentioned but I'd like to add a couple more to why I'd hate to see him president:

1) Point out that he's not making any sense on whatever subject and you're a communist. I have no problem calling this guy an idiot, and if POTUS I'll still be calling him an idiot. But I'd rather not be calling the President an idiot if you know what I mean.

2) We may be discussing politics but we're discussing politics in a Seti forum. And the day Mark wakes up to a msg from Eric that one of his crunchers found THE signal... is the day before Mark himself smashes every single bit of electronics kit on the kittyfarm with a Gibson axe out of frustration.

Because sometime between those two events President Donald will likely start bashing on you, instead of congratulating you Mark. He'll introduce you to the world as Mark "the Hippie from Wisconsin" Sattler member of the pinko cult of Berkeley, accuse you of trying to invite aliens to earth, steal your lunch money, and make fun of the kitties.

Seriously though, does this guy sound like Carl Sagan to you? Arthur Clarke? Spock? Jean-Luc? Dan Werthimer?

You guys (all of you this time) do realize that the POTUS clip confirming alien intelligence will have replay value to the ages of ages?

Amen :)

[quote][quote]I believe I have already made it abundantly clear I will not vote for Trump. Who I will vote for, though, is my own business.

Dr. Carson... Smart, Intelligent, Ethical. Not a President nor Leader.

In what world is Carson ethical? The former physician could have dispelled a myth about vaccinations but decided instead to subscribe to it. In my book, at least, putting the lives of children ahead of one's own political ambitions does not make one ethical. Shame on you CLYDE.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Uh huh?

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

BABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

ENDORSEMENT: CHRISTIE!!!

Two FIGHTERS!!!

BABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!

Sweet is So Sweet.

YAP

---

I believe I have already made it abundantly clear I will not vote for Trump. Who I will vote for, though, is my own business.

Sarge...

Are you for anyone?

I am not. Just a lesser of evils candidate.

There is one I believe is ranking higher than others.

My choice, in order (as of today).

#1 - John Kasich... Centrist and successful Governor.

#2 - Marco Rubio... But dropping fast.

#3 - Bernie Sanders... With the proviso that the Congress is controlled by the Republicans.

Never should be President (in order).

#1 - Trump... #1 because he will be successful, in what he wishes to do.

#2 - Cruz... Crazier and more Fanatical than Trump. #2 because he is incompetent.

#3 - Hillary... Total Fraud and believes in nothing but Hillary.

Dr. Carson... Smart, Intelligent, Ethical. Not a President nor Leader.

I would need to read up more on Kasich and look for parts of debates where he's speaking. (I catch what I can, but sometimes I do not know which network, or am multi-tasking or am too darn tired by the time they air. I was up at 3:30 this morning and in the office at 6.)
Plus, he's dropping fast after NH. As I am not registered with a party, I do not vote in caucuses/primaries.

Rubio, not interested, but I'd have to do more reading and watching to explain. Could I be turned? Maybe, but in ways he seems too much like Cruz.

Cruz, agreed and he would be aiming towards theocracy. (Even when still Christian, I would have been against that.)
So would Carson (aim toward theocracy). Carson is smart about some things, but I question his intelligence in other areas.
Have stated elsewhere that even if Benghazi and the e-mail thing weren't such issues, she's given us reason for pause before she even became a senator.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.

I wonder if Dr. Eric Korpela is getting a laugh out of this discussion. He's from Wisconsin too.

Indeed, he is.

---

Capitalize on this good fortune, one word can bring you round ... changes.