Message boards :
Number crunching :
Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 116 · 117 · 118 · 119 · 120 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
picked up 10 so far I can't expect any more today, due to 1 laptop.. Is that for our day or UTC time/date? Cheers. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Unless another file comes along I've racked up 47 for the 19th Apr UTC. Cheers. |
Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 |
I don't believe it...….151 for the 19th. SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
Man, this is almost like the old days when you could have a full 10-day cache of nothing but these. It's been a great run for like a week now. Can you tell when AP has been available to me? Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Unless another file gets loaded I've got 17 for the 20th Apr UTC. Cheers. |
Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 |
Managed 25 for the 20th SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
My 2 rigs randomly picked up 16 for the 21st Apr UTC. Cheers. |
Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 |
12 for the 21st her....and none so far today. SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
I got 8 resends for the 22nd Apr UTC and an old rig that I fired up here late last night managed to catch 1 of them. Cheers. |
Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 1282 Credit: 187,688,550 RAC: 182 |
2 resends for me. SETI@home classic workunits 4,019 SETI@home classic CPU time 34,348 hours |
Unixchick Send message Joined: 5 Mar 12 Posts: 815 Credit: 2,361,516 RAC: 22 |
what does it mean when results returned and awaiting validation is larger than results out in the field?? is that a bunch of inconclusive results that need a third try?? |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
what does it mean when results returned and awaiting validation is larger than results out in the field?? Probably a bit of that, but also probably just a lot of slower hosts that haven't gotten around to crunching and returning yet. I notice for me, since I'm all on CPU, I almost always get paired up with GPUs who turn the results around within 2-6 hours, but for me, it'll be a few days before crunching even starts on some of those, and then will take 8-12 hours to crunch them. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Just 1 resend here for the 23rd Apr UTC. Cheers. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
what does it mean when results returned and awaiting validation is larger than results out in the field?? Generally the faster a machine is, the more Validation pendings there will be. The slower the machine, the less there will be. An extremely fast machine will always be waiting on other, not so fast systems, to return their work so it can be Validated, and Credit granted. eg Keith Myers system. Average turnaround time 0.15 days 500 In progress, 5103 Validation pending. The other end of the scale, a laptop, Average turnaround time 8.96 days 200 In progress, 11 Validation pending. Grant Darwin NT |
Stargate (SA) Send message Joined: 4 Mar 10 Posts: 1854 Credit: 2,258,721 RAC: 0 |
Very true |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Another Arecibo file has popped up, and it's being split for AP. Grant Darwin NT |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
26 arrived here for the 34th Apr UTC. Cheers. |
Mike Ryan Send message Joined: 24 Jun 99 Posts: 46 Credit: 24,363,752 RAC: 47 |
Bummer none for me the past few days, but for some reason I've still got 16 that have arrived between the 15th and 20th that my queue hasn't gotten around to processing yet. Other than "babysitting" the queue by suspending non-AP tasks, is there some way to help encourage BOINC to process the AP tasks sooner? It seems to have a strong bias for processing the non-AP tasks first as I can crack through 200-250+ of those a day (or all of the non-AP GPU queue 2-3 times) yet the AP tasks sometimes just sit "waiting" for their turn. I'd think perhaps the tasks with sooner deadlines would be processed first, but that never seems to be the case either. For example out of my tower's queue of 200 work units total (100 CPU/100 GPU) the earliest deadline units are due 14th of May, latest 25th of June, and the current ones running are due: 17th of June (2x GPU non-AP units) and 15th of June (3x CPU non-AP units). |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36582 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Bummer none for me the past few days, but for some reason I've still got 16 that have arrived between the 15th and 20th that my queue hasn't gotten around to processing yet. Other than "babysitting" the queue by suspending non-AP tasks, is there some way to help encourage BOINC to process the AP tasks sooner? It seems to have a strong bias for processing the non-AP tasks first as I can crack through 200-250+ of those a day yet the AP tasks sometimes just sit "waiting" for their turn. I'd think perhaps the tasks with sooner deadlines would be processed first, but that never seems to be the case either. For example out of my tower's queue of 200 work units total (100 CPU/100 GPU) the earliest deadline units are due 14th of May, latest 25th of June, and the current ones running are due: 17th of June (2x GPU non-AP units) and 15th of June (3x CPU non-AP units).BOINC always makes sure that work is done on a FIFO basis regarding tasks unless deadlines are forced to come into play (and nothing other than personal intervention will override that). Cheers. |
Mike Ryan Send message Joined: 24 Jun 99 Posts: 46 Credit: 24,363,752 RAC: 47 |
BOINC always makes sure that work is done on a FIFO basis regarding tasks unless deadlines are forced to come into play (and nothing other than personal intervention will override that). Ha - taking another look at my AP page... I've got to look at the correct column. I have actually gotten a few more units the past few days. Currently it's just past 04:15 local time. Guess it's time to go to bed. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.