Message boards :
Number crunching :
Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 84 · 85 · 86 · 87 · 88 · 89 · 90 . . . 120 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
Still splitting I see. Have 35 onboard all crunchers currently; with this daily driver with 19 alone. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
Good Lord!! 123 since this all started 3 days ago. Moved up from 75 to 123 in the last few hours. This is an incredible run....... |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
It looks like I'm up to 178 in the past days, that's a pile for an AP run. EDIT: But 19 of those are still lost soles waiting to get released. |
Kissagogo27 Send message Joined: 6 Nov 99 Posts: 716 Credit: 8,032,827 RAC: 62 |
40 on my only rig ... |
Jimbocous Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 1856 Credit: 268,616,081 RAC: 1,349 |
~230 since the whole deal started, on 3 boxes. Best run I can recall in a couple years? 8 years stale, but hey, if it's science ... Hope it keeps up; 76F today, 30's and snow for Monday, they say ... |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Got a couple, ran two, aborted the last one. They're not going to validate anyway due to my RX470 always reporting zero single and repetitive pulses (the app is apparently too old for my GPU). Too bad, as 20 minutes for run time is quite nice. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36403 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
39 out of this last lot so far and 83 for the last 2 days over 2 rigs. Cheers. |
JaundicedEye Send message Joined: 14 Mar 12 Posts: 5375 Credit: 30,870,693 RAC: 1 |
I set both my rigs to AP only about 6 weeks ago. My RAC has dropped from 29,000 to around 1,500...........when it evaporates so will I. I got 7 AP's in this round...........BIG WHOOP! Probably Sayonara soon. "Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)> |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36403 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
I'm up to Cheers. |
Jimbocous Send message Joined: 1 Apr 13 Posts: 1856 Credit: 268,616,081 RAC: 1,349 |
I set both my rigs to AP only about 6 weeks ago. My RAC has dropped from 29,000 to around 1,500...........when it evaporates so will I. Bummer .... I've actually thought about forgetting APs entirely. Seems to me with SoG (latest Lunatics Beta), MBs are paying as well or better. I'm watching carefully to see what happens to my RAC after this run ... |
JaundicedEye Send message Joined: 14 Mar 12 Posts: 5375 Credit: 30,870,693 RAC: 1 |
I tried SoGs on one rig and it became totally unusable for anything else. Framing and mouse lockup and keyboard delay no matter what values I tried . The other thing I've noticed is I'm not getting any AP Nvidia jobs just Intel(Haswell), and no CPU jobs. Must all be going to the 'Big Rigs'. "Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)> |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13835 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I've actually thought about forgetting APs entirely. Seems to me with SoG (latest Lunatics Beta), MBs are paying as well or better. I'm watching carefully to see what happens to my RAC after this run ... I'm finding 22 min gets 2 AP WUs done for 500 or more Credits. MB varies a lot not only between Arecibo & GBT, but the tasks available in each. Some GBTs take 9min for a bit over 130 Credits (with the randomness it can be as little as 120 or as much as 170!). Others take less than 7min for around 110 (as low as 80 as high as 130). a 5min Arecibo WU can pay between 60 to 120. AP still pays more. However the only reason I'm doing AP is because since the Scheduler was broken back in Dec when it comes to application settings, about the only way to keep getting MBv8 work is to also do AP. Grant Darwin NT |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13835 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
I tried SoGs on one rig and it became totally unusable for anything else. Framing and mouse lockup and keyboard delay no matter what values I tried . When? The first SoG released for stock wasn't ready- the effects were as you described. However the current version in the Lunatics Alpha v6 installer were OK on my GTX 750Ti when it was on my i7, even with aggressive settings. WIth less aggressive settings there was no keyboard/screen lag at all. And that's with a slower CPU than your systems have. The current stock application was further refined to better support much lower end hardware than your listed systems have. EDIT- if you were using your iGPU at the same time, then I can see why your systems were struggling. All it does is slow down your CPU crunching, and impact on feeding your addon GPU. Disable iGPU crunching then try SoG again. The loss of CPU output is only offset with iGPU crunching if you have a limited core count, very low clock rate CPU. That's not the case with either of your systems. AVX for your CPU, SoG with come command line values & no iGPU crunching would give you significant output, with no system responsiveness impact. You could use the iGPU for your monitor display, and use extremely aggressive values for SoG with no effect on system responsiveness. Grant Darwin NT |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
Must all be going to the 'Big Rigs'. I would suggest that the bigger rigs are probably returning more work units every 5 minutes than most rigs, so they end up request more work each time. As such, they end up getting more work units per hour (ie including APs) so that is why the "have more APs". Grant is correct, APs still pay more. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36403 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
Up to Cheers. |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
Must all be going to the 'Big Rigs'. I agree completely. Even with two MB tasks reporting for a combined credit of 110-240, a single AP in the same time frame nets 400-500 credits. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
David@home Send message Joined: 16 Jan 03 Posts: 755 Credit: 5,040,916 RAC: 28 |
I have received my first ever Astropulse GPU units today. However, I find these are crashing Windows, three times today the screen has locked up and the fans slow down as all BOINC work stops. I have a Nviida GTX 750TI, using the recommended command line in the Lunatics documentation: -use_sleep -unroll 10 -oclFFT_plan 256 16 512 -ffa_block 12288 -ffa_block_fetch 6144 There is nothing in the event log to give a hint why Windows crashed, any suggestions please? |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 36403 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
There is nothing in the event log to give a hint why Windows crashed, any suggestions please? If you're going to ask these questions then unhide your computer/s as that will let us see what's going on and then we maybe able to properly help you, pretty much impossible for us to help you otherwise. Cheers. |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
With your computers hidden and unable to read any of your stderr.txt outputs, don't know what your command line looks like. The GTX 750Ti has 5 compute units so your -unroll 10 is exactly TWICE too many. I wouldn't run with -hp either. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
David@home Send message Joined: 16 Jan 03 Posts: 755 Credit: 5,040,916 RAC: 28 |
There is nothing in the event log to give a hint why Windows crashed, any suggestions please? I think I have found the setting to display my computer. I am only getting GPU Astropulse work units now, not had any CPU Astropulse workunits lately. Any advice would be appreciated otherwise I think I will have to abort these work units as PC is too unstable when running them. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.