Message boards :
Number crunching :
Anything relating to AstroPulse tasks
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 . . . 120 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Werecow Send message Joined: 13 Mar 05 Posts: 56 Credit: 4,917,657 RAC: 3 |
I hereby bless you as another saint of kitties....bow down and take you anointment. + Many. A total of 4 feral rescues warming themselves on my rigs, plus another 3 spay/neuter/releases living outside. And just to keep this on topic -- I have one AP. My CPU is working on it like a chihuahua eating an elephant. [Edit] Never mind. -Finally- completed. :) |
Louis Loria II Send message Joined: 20 Oct 03 Posts: 259 Credit: 9,208,040 RAC: 24 |
Really? Is Astropulse so rare? I have picked up 72 since July 3rd. What is the attraction? That is actually a serious question. I don't know much (or anything?) about the WUs. |
TimeLord04 Send message Joined: 9 Mar 06 Posts: 21140 Credit: 33,933,039 RAC: 23 |
Really? Is Astropulse so rare? I have picked up 72 since July 3rd. What is the attraction? That is actually a serious question. I don't know much (or anything?) about the WUs. Much more Credit per WU on AP than MB... :-) So, because of the AP shortage, we've all become greedy little AP hoarders when they are sent out. ;-) TL TimeLord04 Have TARDIS, will travel... Come along K-9! Join Calm Chaos |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
Really? Is Astropulse so rare? I have picked up 72 since July 3rd. What is the attraction? That is actually a serious question. I don't know much (or anything?) about the WUs. Ap is a different analysis of the same data than MB and some of us think it may have a better chance of finding ET, also they do pay more credit per hr than MB. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Really? Is Astropulse so rare? I have picked up 72 since July 3rd. What is the attraction? That is actually a serious question. I don't know much (or anything?) about the WUs. Personally I like AP on my faster machines over MB so they can have more then a few hours of CPU cache. On my i5-4670K's 100 MB tasks running 4 at a time comes to about 20 hours worth of work. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
Speedy Send message Joined: 26 Jun 04 Posts: 1643 Credit: 12,921,799 RAC: 89 |
Really? Is Astropulse so rare? I have picked up 72 since July 3rd. What is the attraction? That is actually a serious question. I don't know much (or anything?) about the WUs. It also gives a good boost to our RAC. My RAC is the highest it has been in a long time |
Graham Middleton Send message Joined: 1 Sep 00 Posts: 1520 Credit: 86,815,638 RAC: 0 |
A question, All the AP WUs I have crunched rcently as OpenCK_NVIDIA_100, seem to be doing most of the work on the CPU, not the GPU, 75%+ CPU usage when they finish. I'm wondering what I've done wrong, or is this normal? Happy Crunching, Graham |
WezH Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 576 Credit: 67,033,957 RAC: 95 |
A question, That is normal to stock AP tasks. Installing Lunatics Optimized Applications will give You options to edit AP task settings so You can decrease CPU usage. |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 |
A question, Stock can do that too, no need to install the Lunatics Optimised Applications just to do that. Claggy |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Cause stock and Lunatics essentially the same binaries measures were taken to allow application tuning w/o going to Anonymous platform. Hence indeed, no need to install "Lunatics" (that is, to go to Anonymous platform) just to tune GPU apps. IMHO there are only 2 advantages of Anonymous platform remains currently: 1) faster CPU apps. 2) more recent/better GPU apps because of faster release cycle for installer than for stock apps update. But second one approaches to zero these days with speedup of stock apps testing cycle and slowdown of new installer version formation. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14650 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Cause stock and Lunatics essentially the same binaries measures were taken to allow application tuning w/o going to Anonymous platform. Hence indeed, no need to install "Lunatics" (that is, to go to Anonymous platform) just to tune GPU apps. You forget to mention the ability to lock in usage of the CUDA version most suitable for your particular NVidia card(s). Although this is an Astropulse-specific thread, the Lunatics installer has to be viewed as a unified whole. |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
Actually this can be done with stock too. few dozens of task abortion implied though. |
Brent Norman Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 2786 Credit: 685,657,289 RAC: 835 |
Well darn, darn and triple darn!!! Pesky things, took me 2 days to get back to 90 AP GPU wu's. And still not even 1 for my CPU. |
S@NL Etienne Dokkum Send message Joined: 11 Jun 99 Posts: 212 Credit: 43,822,095 RAC: 0 |
Well darn, darn and triple darn!!! This same thing happened to me the last AP frenzy... After a sudden reboot S@H was gone completly from my Boinc. Pesky buggers that resends are still off. Now happily crunching away with 200 AP's in my cache :) |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
This latest run of APs has got my RAC the highest it has been since last Nov. when V6 went away. I still doubt I'll get a toaster. |
Cactus Bob Send message Joined: 19 May 99 Posts: 209 Credit: 10,924,287 RAC: 29 |
OK, the AP fest seems to eclipse the one we had last week. SSP shows 2594 APs ready to send and I have 171 APs out of 200 WU's waiting to be crunched. Don't know how long this will last but my RAC went from 19.5K to 16K and now is back up 19K. Maybe it will hit 20 before I crunch all these APs. Ride the wave while it lasts cause like a surfer it isn't constant. Bob SETI@home classic workunits.....4,321 SETI@home classic CPU time......22,169 hour Sometimes I wonder, what happened to all the people I gave directions to? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SETI@home classic workunits 4,321 SETI@home classic CPU time 22,169 hours |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
My 2 rigs' CPU's have had full caches of AP's for a few days now. :-) Cheers. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
My 2 rigs' CPU's have had full caches of AP's for a few days now. :-) In the vernacular of the time that is a good thing. |
Wiggo Send message Joined: 24 Jan 00 Posts: 34744 Credit: 261,360,520 RAC: 489 |
My 2 rigs' CPU's have had full caches of AP's for a few days now. :-) Sure is as the 2500K will be fine for almost 8 days while the 3570K will be good for almost 6 once AP splitting finishes. Cheers. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
One advantage of having a slow rig and then a very slow one is that I get a full 10 day cache on each. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.