Choosing a new GPU

Message boards : Number crunching : Choosing a new GPU
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Bernie Vine
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 9954
Credit: 103,452,613
RAC: 328
United Kingdom
Message 1688294 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 22:05:23 UTC
Last modified: 5 Jun 2015, 22:24:37 UTC

A few years back I kept up to date with what GPU was what.

Recently I have lost touch.

My main machine is my workhorse, used all day for surfing recording videos, etc. It also crunches SETI when not doing anything else.

This is it 6851722

I also play games, mostly RPG's Oblivion, Skyrim, Fallout,etc.

Well yesterday I learnt that Fallout 4 is likely to be released late this year or early next, and I just know my 560 will struggle. it had a hard time with Far Cry 3. It was a second hand card and has worked quite well but I never felt it performed as well as I would have liked.

So what GPU (Nvidia) should I go for I don't want to spend more than £200 ($307- €236) It would need to be an efficient cruncher and work well with modern games.

I am not totally discounting ATI but I have had so many Nvidia GPU's I am just more comfortable with them.

PS the power supply is a Corsair GS800.
ID: 1688294 · Report as offensive
spitfire_mk_2
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 Apr 00
Posts: 563
Credit: 27,306,885
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1688299 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 22:22:41 UTC - in response to Message 1688294.  

budget?
ID: 1688299 · Report as offensive
Profile Bernie Vine
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 9954
Credit: 103,452,613
RAC: 328
United Kingdom
Message 1688300 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 22:23:57 UTC
Last modified: 5 Jun 2015, 22:25:00 UTC

I don't want to spend more than £200 ($307- €236)
ID: 1688300 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1688302 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 22:25:03 UTC

GTX-960 4GB will be around £157, the GTX-970 will be around £233

ID: 1688302 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1688304 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 22:30:16 UTC - in response to Message 1688294.  

The NVidia GTX 960 (the lowest end of the 9xx series) starts around $200 and can climb up to $280~ish. The next grade up is the NVidia GTX 970 (complete with it's 3.5GB RAM buggy-ness that should only be a problem if you're doing 4k gaming), starts at $330.

If you want to stay with the current generation for longevity (which I recommend if you're a budget gamer), then it looks like you're in the 960 range. If you can come up ever-so-slightly on your budget, you can at least get yourself a 970.
ID: 1688304 · Report as offensive
Profile BANZAI56
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 May 00
Posts: 139
Credit: 47,299,948
RAC: 2
United States
Message 1688325 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 23:24:03 UTC - in response to Message 1688294.  

Well yesterday I learnt that Fallout 4 is likely to be released late this year or early next, and I just know my 560 will struggle.


I feel your pain.

The same game will force me to pick and upgrade to one of the next gen consoles.

Gaming on the PC is fine, as my near 1600 hours of Civ. V on Steam will attest, but there's just something about first run RPG's on the 60" Plasma.
ID: 1688325 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 1688327 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 23:31:52 UTC - in response to Message 1688325.  

Gaming on the PC is fine, as my near 1600 hours of Civ. V on Steam will attest, but there's just something about first run RPG's on the 60" Plasma.


Just connect your PC to the 60"? IMO, consoles are a waste of money since they are not nearly as flexible and upgradable as PCs.
ID: 1688327 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13731
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1688332 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 23:51:44 UTC - in response to Message 1688325.  
Last modified: 5 Jun 2015, 23:53:47 UTC

As others have said, the GTX 960/970 is the way to go.

Benchmarks- Far cry 4, Ultra quality. 2560*1440.

Summary,
GTX 580 23.4 fps.
GTX 980 58.8

The 970 is generally within 5-10% of the 980.


Other things to consider,

GTX 560, 150W, 1x 6 pin connector.
GTX 750Ti, 60W
GTX 960, 120W, 1x 6 pin connector.
GTX 970, 145W, 2x 6 pin connectors.
GTX 980, 165W, 2x 6 pin connectors.
GTX 980Ti, 250W, 1x 6 pin & 1x 8 pin connectors.

For crunching only, the GTX 750Ti is king. It provides only slightly less throughput compared to the higher end cards (due to the lack of optimisation at present for it's architecture) and you can use 2 or even 3 of them and still use the same or less power than one of the other cards.


But as you do use yours for gaming, I'd suggest the GTX 970 would be best.
Similar power consumption compared to your present card, more than double the performance (gaming wise), and a reasonable price for the performance compared to the next model up (GTX 980) and the model below (GTX 960).
As long as you have an extra available connector from the power supply available.


Of course if you were to completely kill your budget, a GTX 980Ti is within 3-5% of the gaming performance of the Titan X.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1688332 · Report as offensive
Profile Mike Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Feb 01
Posts: 34257
Credit: 79,922,639
RAC: 80
Germany
Message 1688334 - Posted: 5 Jun 2015, 23:53:40 UTC

A R9 280 is about the same price as a NV 960 but faster especially for gaming.
And with actual apps you can compare it with a 970 in crunching.

Just my 2 cents.


With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.
ID: 1688334 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13731
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1688338 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 0:00:44 UTC - in response to Message 1688334.  

A R9 280 is about the same price as a NV 960 but faster especially for gaming.
And with actual apps you can compare it with a 970 in crunching.

Just my 2 cents.


The thing I don't like about the current AMD Radeons,


The R9 295x2 is a double GPU card (crossfire on a single card, so it has the same issues that crossfire has with 2 separate cards). And being a double GPU card, that means it uses twice the power, but you don't get twice the performance.
And even on a GPU to GPU power comparison, the current AMD cards use a lot more power compared to the NVidia Maxwell GPUs.
AMDs Fiji (to be released almost any day now) is meant to address this, but we'll have to wait and see just how well it does so.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1688338 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 1688344 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 0:38:13 UTC - in response to Message 1688332.  

As others have said, the GTX 960/970 is the way to go.

Benchmarks- Far cry 4, Ultra quality. 2560*1440.

Summary,
GTX 580 23.4 fps.
GTX 980 58.8

The 970 is generally within 5-10% of the 980.


Other things to consider,

GTX 560, 150W, 1x 6 pin connector.
GTX 750Ti, 60W
GTX 960, 120W, 1x 6 pin connector.
GTX 970, 145W, 2x 6 pin connectors.
GTX 980, 165W, 2x 6 pin connectors.
GTX 980Ti, 250W, 1x 6 pin & 1x 8 pin connectors.

For crunching only, the GTX 750Ti is king. It provides only slightly less throughput compared to the higher end cards (due to the lack of optimisation at present for it's architecture) and you can use 2 or even 3 of them and still use the same or less power than one of the other cards.


But as you do use yours for gaming, I'd suggest the GTX 970 would be best.
Similar power consumption compared to your present card, more than double the performance (gaming wise), and a reasonable price for the performance compared to the next model up (GTX 980) and the model below (GTX 960).
As long as you have an extra available connector from the power supply available.


Of course if you were to completely kill your budget, a GTX 980Ti is within 3-5% of the gaming performance of the Titan X.

GTX 560, 150W, 1x 6 pin connector.

I thought people were making errors with this card...
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 1688344 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13731
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 1688347 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 0:49:50 UTC - in response to Message 1688344.  

GTX 560, 150W, 1x 6 pin connector.

I thought people were making errors with this card...

The GTX 560Ti generally had 2 connectors.
Some factory overclocked 560s may also have had 2 connectors.
People overclocking a card with one connector may have resulted in more issues than those trying to overclock cards with 2. Many of the 560Tis came with factory overclocks, which while Ok for games were problematic for crunching.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1688347 · Report as offensive
Profile zoom3+1=4
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Nov 03
Posts: 65738
Credit: 55,293,173
RAC: 49
United States
Message 1688348 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 0:56:58 UTC - in response to Message 1688347.  

GTX 560, 150W, 1x 6 pin connector.

I thought people were making errors with this card...

The GTX 560Ti generally had 2 connectors.
Some factory overclocked 560s may also have had 2 connectors.
People overclocking a card with one connector may have resulted in more issues than those trying to overclock cards with 2. Many of the 560Tis came with factory overclocks, which while Ok for games were problematic for crunching.

Ok, understood.
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's
ID: 1688348 · Report as offensive
qbit
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 04
Posts: 630
Credit: 6,868,528
RAC: 0
Austria
Message 1688411 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 5:15:57 UTC

According to tbe latest edition of my favorit hardware mag the best choice would be this card:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/MSI-Nvidia-960-Gaming-Graphics/dp/B00SKTY6PS/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1433567115&sr=8-1&keywords=gtx+960+gaming

Good performance, rather low power consumption (they say it's 135W max) and, very important in my opinion, it's also very quiet (they measured 0.4 sone under full load while other GTX 960s reach up to 1.6 sone!).
ID: 1688411 · Report as offensive
kittyman Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Jul 00
Posts: 51468
Credit: 1,018,363,574
RAC: 1,004
United States
Message 1688413 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 5:19:17 UTC

Side note, and sorry if I intrude.............
But, if I shall ever embark upon a new computer build.........
I am at this point, like a virgin.

Funny, because I used to know all the ins and outs and whatevers.

My rigs are old now, have been slaving away on Seti for years, and I am afraid of what I might have to learn to replace one these days...
"Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster

ID: 1688413 · Report as offensive
qbit
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 04
Posts: 630
Credit: 6,868,528
RAC: 0
Austria
Message 1688425 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 6:16:18 UTC

Don't worry Mark, bunch of Geeks here that will be happy to help :-)
ID: 1688425 · Report as offensive
Profile Bernie Vine
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 9954
Credit: 103,452,613
RAC: 328
United Kingdom
Message 1688447 - Posted: 6 Jun 2015, 7:34:46 UTC

Thanks for the suggestions. Looks like a 960 or 970, depending on prices I can find.

Time to start saving.

I have a jar on the side so each day when I come in I check my change, If I have two or more £1 coins then one goes in the jar, current jar was emptied in Feb

Looked today £45, so I am almost a third of the way there!!
ID: 1688447 · Report as offensive
Profile cliff west

Send message
Joined: 7 May 01
Posts: 211
Credit: 16,180,728
RAC: 15
United States
Message 1689286 - Posted: 8 Jun 2015, 22:17:56 UTC - in response to Message 1688447.  

i would wait a few months if you can. the GTX 980Ti is coming out, when it does i would expect all the less powerful cards to drop in price.
ID: 1689286 · Report as offensive
Jon

Send message
Joined: 12 Aug 09
Posts: 157
Credit: 139,063,241
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1689366 - Posted: 9 Jun 2015, 3:28:56 UTC

I'm looking at the 780ti vs 980ti only for Seti work.

780ti 2880 cuda cores 3gb memory
980ti 2816 cuda cores 6gb memory

the boost and core are similar. other things seem close to each other. what increase would the $700 980ti have over the $400 780ti? and how much does the 6gb help vs 3gb?
Jon
ID: 1689366 · Report as offensive
woohoo
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Oct 13
Posts: 972
Credit: 165,671,404
RAC: 5
United States
Message 1689375 - Posted: 9 Jun 2015, 3:59:04 UTC - in response to Message 1689366.  

I'm looking at the 780ti vs 980ti only for Seti work.

780ti 2880 cuda cores 3gb memory
980ti 2816 cuda cores 6gb memory

the boost and core are similar. other things seem close to each other. what increase would the $700 980ti have over the $400 780ti? and how much does the 6gb help vs 3gb?


given those numbers I would expect the two cards to perform very similarly. the 980ti does have a lot more render output units which might help slightly with AP, but not enough to justify the huge difference in price. the extra memory would help in some games but not in these science apps.
ID: 1689375 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Choosing a new GPU


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.