Message boards :
Number crunching :
Windows 10 - Yea or Nay?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 109 · 110 · 111 · 112 · 113 · 114 · 115 . . . 163 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
I can't imagine how businesses are going to accept that with business critical apps running, and then MS lobs an "update" over the wall, blowing up said program without getting permission. I think that will be a huge hulking fly in that ointment for them. I used to work in IT years ago, and if they had tried to pull something like that, with no regression/compatibility testing, it would have been war. lol Updates work differently for consumer vs business. Consumers, by default, run Current Branch, but can opt-in to Preview Branch if they want to be be guinea pigs. Businesses with Windows 10 Pro or Enterprise can run Current Branch for Business. Businesses with Windows 10 Enterprise can also run Long Term Servicing Branch. Each branch has different options for deferring or blocking updates. Any moderately sized business I would expect to be using Windows Server Update Services instead of allowing each client to update individually. Which gives admins control over which updates the clients will get. That way if a business finds there is an issue with update KB8675309 they can block from their clients before it is ever deployed. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6658 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
I have actually seen bad updates mentioned here in the past, and relayed them to out IT Admin before they caused problems. One update I am thinking of could actually brick a machine. Our Admin stopped the update until it was patched. Steve Edit: And they say I shouldn't be looking at Seti while I work...... :D Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
I believe it was mentioned in a MS WSUS Best Practices document to have a sandbox to test updates before they are deployed. I think the default, or recommended, configuration makes all updates available to the clients as soon as they are downloaded by the server. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
Sirius B Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24921 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 |
Excellent, thanks for that Jord. Will make things much easier & save a lot of time & grief. :-) |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
I believe it was mentioned in a MS WSUS Best Practices document to have a sandbox to test updates before they are deployed. I think the default, or recommended, configuration makes all updates available to the clients as soon as they are downloaded by the server. I use WSUS here at home, and if I recall correctly.. the default is needing manual approval for new updates. You can set up multiple groups, and you can approve updates for a 'guinea pig' group, and a 'production' group, or all. In environments that have more than like.. 5 machines, you have one set aside to be a guinea pig. Approve all the updates for the guinea pig group, see how that machine reacts and if anything breaks. If it's fine, then you can go back and approve all those updates for 'production'. I have heard of some people doing 'automatically approve updates for distribution' in WSUS, and that sounds like a disaster waiting to happen, to me. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Al Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 1682 Credit: 477,343,364 RAC: 482 |
That is how it is working now, but how do you think what you have said applies to it when it becomes a Windows as a Service, with no version releases, just basically continuous updates/patches? That is going to be a whole new paradigm, but I suppose that if they are allowed to, as now, opt out of having them back-doored into their systems, then they'll be safe, but I'll feel pity for the unfortunate souls on the consumer side of things. |
Jeff Buck Send message Joined: 11 Feb 00 Posts: 1441 Credit: 148,764,870 RAC: 0 |
I see KB3123862, "Updated capabilities to upgrade Windows 8.1 and Windows 7" was re-re-released again yesterday. In the "Update replacement information" section it claims: "This update doesn't replace a previously released update." I guess replacing itself doesn't count. ;^) |
Shawn Rothermund Send message Joined: 13 Feb 03 Posts: 132 Credit: 79,997,445 RAC: 123 |
Hello everyone just a quick question for now a lady I work with just had her computer upgraded to 10 without her permission and I want to tell her how to rollback to her 8 but I forget how to do it. I had given her a copy of Cosmic's list but she had not removed anything yet. Thanks for your help. ME AND MY BOY LOOKING FOR ET |
Siran d'Vel'nahr Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 7379 Credit: 44,181,323 RAC: 238 |
...how can we trust this to be legit? Greetings Jord, I highly doubt that this thread would exist if everyone trusted Micro$oft. ;) As for KB3133977, I find it very hard to believe that ASUS is the only motherboard manufacture to send out their boards with Secure Boot enabled. I believe that KB3133977 was just one more trick from Micro$oft's bag to get Win7 users to upgrade to Window$ 10. I don't know much about Secure Boot except that I had to disable it to install Linux next to Win7. Keep on BOINCing...! :) CAPT Siran d'Vel'nahr - L L & P _\\// Winders 11 OS? "What a piece of junk!" - L. Skywalker "Logic is the cement of our civilization with which we ascend from chaos using reason as our guide." - T'Plana-hath |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 21375 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
I highly doubt that this thread would exist if everyone trusted Micro$oft. ;) [Shrug] :-( I moved over to other system after what I considered to be unholy compromises made for WinXP and the ensuing ongoing malware crapshoot. For what I see for the move to Win10: Add proprietary tyranny to that! Are Windows users really so hopelessly trapped and befuddled by the Microsoft Marketing? Or are computer users just hopelessly trapped and shackled? :-( IT is what we allow it to be, Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
I don't recall if we decided in this thread to avoid the May 2016 roll-up for 7 or not... I can't find anything inherently wrong with it... but I don't know if I can trust it just yet without doing more research. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Dr Who Fan Send message Joined: 8 Jan 01 Posts: 3368 Credit: 715,342 RAC: 4 |
I don't recall if we decided in this thread to avoid the May 2016 roll-up for 7 or not... I can't find anything inherently wrong with it... but I don't know if I can trust it just yet without doing more research. I downloaded & used it today on an install for Win7 (w/SP1) and did not find any Win10 "malware" or "telemetry beacons" in it. I think it's OK to use. |
Ulrich Metzner Send message Joined: 3 Jul 02 Posts: 1256 Credit: 13,565,513 RAC: 13 |
I also installed the May 2016 roll-up, seems to be doing, what it claims, no Win 10 fuzz in it - so far. ;) ...but some old fellow in new disguise had to be dismissed again! Aloha, Uli |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51492 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I have had my daily driver on 7 locked down with update disabled for months now. What, exactly, do I have to do if I wish to bring it up to date with this package without risking any 10 shenanigans? "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
Ulrich Metzner Send message Joined: 3 Jul 02 Posts: 1256 Credit: 13,565,513 RAC: 13 |
I have had my daily driver on 7 locked down with update disabled for months now. Simply turn on updates, but select the option "search for updates but manually download and install them", also important to DESELECT the option to install "recommended" updates like security updates. Then simply wait, until windows tells you, there are updates available. At that time go to the list of updates and compare the numbers to the list of updates to avoid. On every update you do not want to install, do a right click and select "hide". After you have hidden all updates you don't want, click "install" and windows will install only the updates you have not hidden. You'll have to do this on BOTH selections, the security and the optional updates. Unfortunately you'll have to do this every time again, since M$ often re-releases updates by simply giving them a new version and the hidden updates will show again... :/ Aloha, Uli |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51492 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I was under the impression that this package could be a one time manually download and install thingy...... Guess I was wrong. Meowsigh. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
Ulrich Metzner Send message Joined: 3 Jul 02 Posts: 1256 Credit: 13,565,513 RAC: 13 |
I was under the impression that this package could be a one time manually download and install thingy...... If you only want this standalone update, you can download it here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/3156417 Goto method 2 and download the version matching your system. Aloha, Uli |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51492 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I was under the impression that this package could be a one time manually download and install thingy...... That is what I was looking at. No buried 10 nonsense included? Meow? "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
Ulrich Metzner Send message Joined: 3 Jul 02 Posts: 1256 Credit: 13,565,513 RAC: 13 |
That is what I was looking at. I got this through windows update, i personally don't know for sure, but didn't find anything wrong with it. Also GWX_control_panel is happy ever after, but i won't bet my life on it! ;) Aloha, Uli |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
I think Woody has given me confidence in this update (he mentions it near the end, after explaining the history of these monthly rollups). For now, it appears that this roll-up only really contains two benign non-security patches. This time. We'll see how the future unfolds on these rollups. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.