Message boards :
Number crunching :
Windows 10 - Yea or Nay?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 97 · 98 · 99 · 100 · 101 · 102 · 103 . . . 160 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 3847 Credit: 1,114,826,392 RAC: 3,319 ![]() ![]() |
I've seen numerous reports that if you have Windows 7 and previously noted KB3035583 installed, it is now starting to install Windows 10 automatically, without any notification or permission being given. It does give a 30-day opt-out option after the restart... but really. Great time to get GWX Control Panel if you haven't already. ![]() |
AMDave Send message Joined: 9 Mar 01 Posts: 234 Credit: 11,671,730 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Great time to get GWX Control Panel if you haven't already. I've had it installed for over a month - so far so good. I've found an update to an article I listed in a previous post (Message 1768671). Updated 3/12/16 > How to block Windows 10 upgrades on your business network (and at home, too) Here is a newer (3/11/16) article that can be added to the list: > How existing Windows users can refuse Microsoft's Windows 10 update |
![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jul 15 Posts: 268 Credit: 1,735,966 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I've seen numerous reports that if you have Windows 7 and previously noted KB3035583 installed, it is now starting to install Windows 10 automatically, without any notification or permission being given. It does give a 30-day opt-out option after the restart... but really. OMG, OMG, How COOL the GWX Control Panel is !! It is AWESUM!! I feel MUCH safer now with my beloved Win 7 Pro 64 bit. I was so so afraid of losing the ability to run "Win XP Mode" on it. May I please ask a dumb question? It has been a long time since I looked for M$ updates. I have my PC set to "download updates but do not install w/o permission." However, I have forgotten a few things. I know if I click Start / Control Panel / Review your computer's status (under System & Security) I get a screen with MANY options. Down on the bottom left is "Windows Update." I assume I click this and it searches for updates. I then see, after the search, a page that shows the 'important updates' and 'optional updates' available. Respectively, I have 50 & 17. I forgot HOW to HIDE the bad ones? I remember you check a box or something, but just don't remember the details? How to remove certain updates from view? If I look at my KB list of bad updates I can then hide them. This will leave me with security updates i really should install along with 'net framework' updates i should also install. How to i hide bad files? Thank you kind gentlemen, and the few ladies out there :) River Song (aka Linda Latte on planet Earth) "Happy I-Phone girl on the GO GO GO" |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 ![]() ![]() |
Right-click the updates you don't want in the list. You will be presented with the hide option. Then hit the OK button at the bottom. You should then see the unwanted update in the Restore Hidden Update selection in the left window. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours ![]() ![]() A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jul 15 Posts: 268 Credit: 1,735,966 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thank you !!!!!!!!!!! River Song (aka Linda Latte on planet Earth) "Happy I-Phone girl on the GO GO GO" |
![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 ![]() |
http://www.computerworld.com/article/3044518/microsoft-windows/users-seethe-as-windows-10-arrives-while-their-backs-are-turned.html Some Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 users have begun to howl over Microsoft's practice of automatically upgrading their PCs to Windows 10, saying that they were never given a chance to decline the upgrade before it installed itself. ... "My computer was working great last night [but] this morning it says, 'Microsoft Legal Agreement' with bunch of legal information and WAY at the bottom 'Accept your new Windows 10' or 'Decline,'" wrote a someone identified as scifixtion in a Friday post to Microsoft's support forum. "I hit Decline and it says, 'It will take a few moments to go back to your old Windows software,' [but] then it goes black and go[es] right back to [the] Microsoft legal agreement [and shows] 'Accept windows 10' or 'Decline.' I've hit Decline a dozen times and it won't budge." ... "So my Windows 7 machine was upgraded to Windows 10 without my permission about 2 days ago," echoed rtn1797. "I downgraded [to Windows 7] but now there is a prompt that is continuously open and asking me to select a time for my Windows to update to 10. WTF?" ... Some said that the EULA -- where users were given a final opportunity to reject Windows 10, albeit a process that then took time to restore the previous operating system -- appeared out of nowhere. Others reported that their systems had upgraded themselves after they'd been away from the keyboard for days, or perhaps just hours. "This is happening to my desktop which runs [Windows] 8.1. A few days ago I came back from the shower to find my computer in the process of doing the upgrade by itself," said Heck_Tate on Monday. "I had to wait for the entire thing to complete, decline the EULA, and then wait for it to reinstall previous OS. It's now in the process of doing the exact same thing again and I'm about ready to just say f*** Windows and go with Linux." Last October, Microsoft announced that it would push the free Windows 10 upgrade to eligible PCs automatically, a practice that actually began six weeks ago. The company has repeatedly said -- including yesterday -- that users could decline the Windows 10 upgrade at some point during installation, but has refused to say whether the upgrade starts in all cases, document how the user authorization process plays out, and spell out whether it appears again later when a user snubs the offer. Thus, the fact that machines have tried to upgrade without user action wasn't new: Microsoft has acknowledged that that is its intent. Instead, it's the fact that some users have been unable to abort the installation, restore the older OS after 10 arrived or have received the upgrade when they've ticked the don't-upgrade-automatically settings for Windows Update, that are at issue. ... There are ways to block the Windows 10 upgrade from installing on an eligible PC. Microsoft has published instructions for editing the Windows Registry -- a dangerous chore for inexperienced users -- that will do the job. And Josh Mayfield, a software engineer and developer, has created a tool dubbed GWX Control Panel that keeps track of incoming updates, detects those that are designed to force-feed Windows 10, and thwarts them. |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
British Telecom - the UK's largest ISP (allegedly) - has put the same sort of thing into their home page rotating news gallery: http://home.bt.com/tech-gadgets/tech-news/users-complain-that-windows-10-installs-without-their-permission-11364046259367 |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
From the Computer World link: Microsoft regularly updates Windows Update, and in the past, some of those updates have switched user-selected settings or pre-checked optional updates. Recent refreshes of Windows Update -- the latest was issued on March 8 for Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 -- may have done just that, triggering the automatic upgrades on PCs that should have been immune from a forced migration. This circles back to the "FUD" back in ~September about these new Windows Update clients changing settings and automatically downloading the rest of the updates to avoid in the background, without authorization, nor notification that it is doing so. I've said it a few times that MS would get crafty, and to be honest, in my opinion, I think they are bordering on... maybe not criminal levels, but they've definitely gone into the realm of being unethical at this point. This whole thing has gone from "Hey, world! 10 is going to be free for anyone who wants to upgrade from 7/8.1! Cool, right?" to "We are Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile." Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
And my laptop has told me of the new updates that are available. Some repeat offenders.. 2952664, 3138612, 3139929 ("when a security update is not a security update"). But the optional ones that I got appear to be harmless, but I don't need any of them, so I chose to hide them. 3133977, 3137061, 3138901, 3139923. It's up to you to decide if you want those or not, but they seem to pertain to some pretty special circumstances that I think most people are not in. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Rasputin42 Send message Joined: 25 Jul 08 Posts: 412 Credit: 5,834,661 RAC: 0 ![]() |
"We are Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile." They, at least, have the excuse of being fictional. |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
http://hothardware.com/news/microsoft-calls-bs-on-rogue-windows-10-upgrades Despite significant user outcry that the Windows 10 upgrade mechanism has gone rogue, installing on customers' Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 machines when their backs turned or otherwise away from the computer, Microsoft is pleading innocent. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Sirius B ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24927 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 ![]() |
Think Bill Gates needs to do a Steve Jobs & clear out all the dead wood in Microsoft. With some exceptions regardless what the purists say, Windows has been fit for purpose up to Win 7. After that... |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Mar 12 Posts: 5375 Credit: 30,870,693 RAC: 1 ![]() |
Gates has no connection to the day to day operations at M$. Satya Nadella is running the show, former head of 'cloud' development it's not surprising he would steer the O$ to a choiceless scenario giving the users as much say in their computing lives as the 'untouchables' of his culture of origin. ![]() "Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)> |
OTS Send message Joined: 6 Jan 08 Posts: 371 Credit: 20,533,537 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Gates has no connection to the day to day operations at M$. I do not think Steve Jobs did either until he came back after John Sculley. I think that is what Sirius B was suggesting for Bill Gates. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Jul 15 Posts: 268 Credit: 1,735,966 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Hi All, Question #1 I have recently added the GWX Control Panel for protection from M$ efforts to destroy my Win 7 64-bit PC. I've noticed that, if I do a re-boot, that GWX does not restart automatically. Rather than doing that, it shows a box on-screen which I must click to restart GWX and see it in my system tray. This poses a problem and a danger. My PC does a virus scan at night, and if it finds a bad thing that has found its way into my computer, it re-boots in order to eradicate the bug. If this happens at midnight, and I'm sleeping, my PC could run all night without protection. I see nothing mentioned about making GWX automatically re-start on a re-boot? What to do? Is this possible? Question #2 One other thing. I did something dumb, I think, because I'm frightened by M$ underhanded tricks. I went to Control Panel / System and Security, then Review your computer's status, then Windows Update, and finally Change Settings. I unchecked all boxes in the lower part of the menu, so that, I now only see TWO "check boxes," BOTH unchecked. One is the Give me recommended updates......, and the other is Who can install updates..... Before I did my "dumb thing," I had, I think. at least TWO other menu choices, but they're gone now. I think ONE of the choices may be one I should not have removed? I think it had to do with receiving future M$ security updates? I want up-dates, in the form of KB files, so I can install the security ones. How do I get the missing menu choice(s) back, or should I not worry about it? Note that I have the important menu choice, titled "Important updates," set to "Check for updates but let me choose whether to download and install them." Gee, what a hassle! I've started looking at Mac's and played with one. I see nice things, but there are things I use with Win 7 I don't think I can get on a Mac. :( River Song (aka Linda Latte on planet Earth) "Happy I-Phone girl on the GO GO GO" |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
Question #1 I assume you have a shortcut (probably on the desktop) for GWX? If so, press (and hold) ctrl, click (and hold) the shortcut, drag it to the start menu > all programs > startup and release the mouse and then ctrl. This will put the shortcut to launch GWX control panel at logon. This assumes that you go straight to the desktop when you boot up (without having to type in a password). If you don't have automatic logon, this won't really help to make sure it is running at all times, but it will automate that one and make one less step to go through every time you log in. (see below for more related info) Question #2 This, for now, is the best safeguard you have to stay in control of YOUR computer. Nothing will be downloaded OR installed unless you specifically give it permission to do so. This gives you a chance to look at the KB numbers and investigate what each and every update does. The Microsoft website is generally pretty good at explaining it without going into detail, but when all else fails, if you wait 2-3 days after new updates show up and just google the numbers, almost always, on the first page of results, you'll find an article on one of the common sites (like for example, Infoworld's "when a security update isn't a security update") if it's an update that is questionable or one that may be riddled with controversy. I suspect that it will not be toooo much longer before there won't be any option but to either be assimilated, or just turn updates off entirely. All the signs are pointing toward one of those two outcomes. I've started looking at Mac's and played with one. I see nice things, but there are things I use with Win 7 I don't think I can get on a Mac. :( I've played with Linux off and on since ~2006 and it has merits. There are things I like about it, but there are always caveats, as well. For probably 90% of Windows users, Linux does everything they use/"need" Windows for, they just don't want to switch because "everything is just soooo different." I totally understand that, as I am very much a creature of habit and I'm not very receptive to unwanted change. But at the same time...there's cool stuff in 10 that I do like, but the spying and the complete lack of control of MY machine makes me not want it. I suspect that this concern/mindset is not unique or rare. I want to like 10.. I really do, but I can't trust it until the spying crap is removed and guaranteed to be gone. Then I will consider it. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Sirius B ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 24927 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 7 ![]() |
Gates has no connection to the day to day operations at M$. Exactly, & just look at what Apple achieved on his return. :-) |
kittyman ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51527 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 ![]() ![]() |
I smell a world class action suit coming on... Kitties sniff it...sniff sniff sniff. I predict that it is going to bring MS to it's knees once and for all. They have simply overstepped all acceptable boundaries. Just inserting lingo into the EULA does not make it legal by forcing you to sign it. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Mar 12 Posts: 5375 Credit: 30,870,693 RAC: 1 ![]() |
Unlike Steve Jobs, who was fired from Apple and left on bad terms, Bill Gates has nothing left to prove. He's a Billionaire MANY times over, is enjoying his family life and running the Foundation. I really don't see him riding in on a White Horse and saving the users unless............the board gets panicked by loss of market share and impending suits and boycotts. So we have some work to do boys and girls........ ![]() "Sour Grapes make a bitter Whine." <(0)> |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.