FEED ME MORE - FEED ME MORE!

留言板 : Number crunching : FEED ME MORE - FEED ME MORE!
留言板合理

To post messages, you must log in.

前 · 1 · 2

作者消息
Sleepy
志愿者测试人员
Avatar

发送消息
已加入:21 May 99
贴子:214
积分:98,947,784
近期平均积分:28,360
Italy
消息 1548859 - 发表于:28 Jul 2014, 8:23:27 UTC - 回复消息 1548702.  
最近的修改日期:28 Jul 2014, 8:24:04 UTC

The more tapes they put in one go, the longer they will last, but then the longer will be the starvation period for APs.

The best, which depends on each computer crunching capabilities, would be that they put as many tapes so that with 200 WUs in cache you can survive the period during which the AP splitters are disabled while MB Wus are still being split.

The more powerful your PC is, the lower number of tapes you would wish to be loaded at any one time if you want to have a continuos supply of AP WUs.

Paradoxically, this present bonanza can mean a long starvation when the AP splitters will stop for medium to high capacity crunchers.

Which may not be in line with your happyness.

Though things are actually generally going much better (I would say very well) since colo transfer.

All the best,
Sleepy
ID: 1548859 · 举报违规帖子
Profile HAL9000
志愿者测试人员
Avatar

发送消息
已加入:11 Sep 99
贴子:6533
积分:196,805,888
近期平均积分:57
United States
消息 1548834 - 发表于:28 Jul 2014, 7:25:21 UTC

In the past I seem to recall AP work being much more common. With the few AP only crunchers only mentioning running out of work every few months.

- With the introduction of v7 of MB a large difference in credit between MB & AP lead more people to run AP only.
- We now have a Nvidia AP app. So the crunchers that have beefy GPU systems can tear though the AP work faster than ever.
- With people favoring AP work over MB the MB tasks are not getting burned through as quickly as they otherwise would.

- Moving to the colo may also play a part in things. As they move the data for splitting to the servers and back over the network. I'm not sure if that is how it was done before or if they were just plugging drives into the system to dump the data.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!
ID: 1548834 · 举报违规帖子
Profile Cliff Harding
志愿者测试人员
Avatar

发送消息
已加入:18 Aug 99
贴子:1432
积分:110,967,840
近期平均积分:67
United States
消息 1548702 - 发表于:28 Jul 2014, 0:01:03 UTC

If this old man's mind has not gone completely senile, the servers have been feeding my 2 hungry GTX750Ti FTW GPUs with a steady diet of AP WUs since we came back up from the weekly maintenance period on Tuesday. That's going on 5+ days now and I'm certainly not complaining and I hope I don't put a jinx on it. The question is - Do any of you old heads out there in the Setiverse remember the longest we've been served such a rich diet?


I don't buy computers, I build them!!
ID: 1548702 · 举报违规帖子
前 · 1 · 2

留言板 : Number crunching : FEED ME MORE - FEED ME MORE!


 
©2020 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.