Message boards :
Number crunching :
AP WUs?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Bill Collins Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 25 Credit: 57,544,918 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Are there any more AP WUs coming out of the hopper soon? It's feast or famine. - Bill -Bill |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
Once the current batch of tapes are done being split into MB tasks there will be. See: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_status.html SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
Thomas Send message Joined: 9 Dec 11 Posts: 1499 Credit: 1,345,576 RAC: 0 ![]() |
You can read this, Bill, posted by Rob Smith >> AP Availability |
Sleepy ![]() Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 219 Credit: 98,947,784 RAC: 28,360 ![]() ![]() |
Should be sooner than later now, anyway, judging by the server status. MBs are drying out on the server and soon new tapes will have to be loaded on the system. Better not too many rather than 500+ channels to avoid long periods without APs. The more powerful your system, the lower number of tapes to be loaded at any time you would prefer (however neglecting possible problems of network congestion and AP WU production during the reloading periods by the clients). From my observations, 300-350 channels at a time would best suit midrange crunchers as myself. Bigger crunchers would prefer maybe 150 at a time (but I imagine this would require more work by the people at the lab). Slower crunchers can do well with 500+ at a time. Sleepy |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11225 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 ![]() ![]() |
And now we are in a major famine. |
Bill Collins Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 25 Credit: 57,544,918 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thanks Thomas and Hal. I thought it would be something like that. I've been trying to maximize my SETI productivity by gearing up with a new GTX670 and some other stuff in the quest to find ET. So I'm very much aware of the loss of AP units as they are direct indicators of what my machines can do when using the Lunatics optimized crunching applications. In trying to step up one of my machines I upgraded the power supply, but it didn't have a molex to ATX connector on it so I'm down a small cruncher until later this week when the connector comes in the mail. Maybe by then we'll have some more APs to crunch. - Bill -Bill |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
With only a few observations it looks like we burn through enough MB tasks for 20-30 channels to be processes a day. Right now there are around 160 more channels to do. So if no new data was loaded then we still have about a weeks worth of data before the tape run out. They may load new data to be split before then, but they may not. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
I guess this is probably about the only good thing about using CPU only to crunch APs... a 10-day cache is ~60 APs for me. I've only run dry I think twice since building this machine two years + 3 months ago. I still have about 6 days of cache left. :p Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 6 Aug 99 Posts: 204 Credit: 12,463,705 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
It would be nice if selecting a 10 day cache, you would actually get a 10 day cache.... Well BOINC will fill a 10 day cache if you have enough other projects that do not have task limits. As I run almost only CPU & have a lot of old hardware the 100 task limit is nearly a 10 day cache on most of my machines. Several of my machines that I allow AP work still have 20-30 AP to do. While my fastest only has 9 left. So the RAC on that system is a submarine... "Prepare to dive!" lol SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Mar 01 Posts: 783 Credit: 348,560,338 RAC: 223 ![]() ![]() |
I think they're starting up again... ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11225 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 ![]() ![]() |
Yes, and I just got 5 on 1 machine. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Mar 01 Posts: 783 Credit: 348,560,338 RAC: 223 ![]() ![]() |
Yes, and I just got 5 on 1 machine. Yeah, I hadn't scrolled down far enough on the status page to see that a new "tape" had been mounted just before the hour; I was going on having just received two WUs, and a nascent uptick on the Cricket graph. I've now got four crunching on my two GPUs (along with 7 CPU jobs) so I've got 100 mins or so to get enough more to continue crunching when these are done. :-) ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
Yeah. Full 10-day cache is ~60 WUs for me. I have tried once or twice before to bring my max CPUs up to 100% (normally at 50%) to stockpile a few more days worth (and then drop back down to 50%). In fact.. I did that before the move to to co-lo. I was sitting on 19 days of AP cache and the downtime only ended up being like..two days, maybe 3. That was not the expected result by basically anyone. I haven't done that since though. Seems kind of like cheating/hoarding even though it really isn't. Anyway.. I acquired 38 APs to top the 10-day cache off again. Filled to the brim. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11225 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 ![]() ![]() |
Filled to the brim. That creates a good feeling. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 6 Aug 99 Posts: 204 Credit: 12,463,705 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
Bill Collins Send message Joined: 5 Nov 05 Posts: 25 Credit: 57,544,918 RAC: 0 ![]() |
But they're back again! -Bill -Bill |
David S ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 18352 Credit: 27,761,924 RAC: 12 ![]() ![]() |
But they're back again! And they're gone again. Splitting is finished, so when the current pile of them runs dry, that's it until 390 channels of MB finish. David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6533 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 ![]() ![]() |
Anybody else experiencing longer than usual crunch times on this batch of APs due possibly to high blanking? All of the APs I have looked at so far are all 0.00 blanking. However I didn't really check out the pulse count on them SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours |
©2023 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.