So here adding just Expression, when it also could be Mathematics for this as well.

Just falling off again, but at least ground, for just groundless, could still be difference for that of word, except not any context versus meaning either.

Still the little "is", for also are, when also meant, for only meant to be, and perhaps not any bent or inclined for such, when rather propensity instead.

So, if still not any person versus persona non grata being any the same either, only just way of writing, for that of a definition for the same,
could sometimes make me think of God, for only a Creator, when next up the sleeves for such as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition

Here making it "fallible" earlier on, and except for different spellings of this word, not always any liked either, for just welcome.

Making it only such a thing, and it becomes only nature for such, only because we could end up thinking that it could be flawed, by only Design.

So here proving science as usual, for only the Method we could be using, except still perhaps the Method of Proof flawed as well, for only just Proof.

If two different ways could still be leading to Rome, also one for the more physical part, while the other the more Conceptual, or Abstract part.

But next perhaps still side by side, for only just the rays we could make it, except still the circle in the middle, which could symbolize God.

We know that the soil could be still fertile, for also fruitful, except still the Iron in your blood, for also the Calcium of your skeleton, for only just an old story.

Any Set instead, and it could not only tell, but rather relate instead, for perhaps only Relational Databases for such, except not any Algebra either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_algebra

So here perhaps the unary operator for not finding the operator itself, but should be in the text.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unary

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unary_operation

Always, for not any never either, except sometimes only questioning, except not interfering in any validation method, for only a project I could be a part of.

Any leaf, for still only the tree itself, when next also trunk, and still only Conceptual model for such, and here looking for the one showing the green leaves,
except rather that of still part versus whole once again, which could more remind me of that of Sets, for only just things combined.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept

If perhaps only making it "Bird Phoenix" instead, for not any Myth or Legends either, we could end up with a Metaphor for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor

Just striking at times, for not any contrast either, and it could be just brilliant, except not any color or shape for such either,
so for only that, still only a distant future we sometimes could make it, except not looking back at History either, for only the past.

The reality you think there is, should still be the thing you could describe, except not making it any Dreams either.

Any single whole we sometimes could make it, could be just Cosmology for such, and for that, also the Cosmological argument.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument

But next think only, and for that, just groundbreaking or pioneering at times, except not any science without borders you could make it either.

Except still tempted here to stick with only the first one right now.

My sense of it is that either you could make it God for only an argument for such, except rather personal experience instead, which at best could make it that of real life.

Next, questioning which part, for next that of a whole, and for that, both infinity and the singularity, for perhaps two different fashions or Aspects.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodology

Any such thing for only Matter Creation versus The Big Bang, and it becomes only the grand scale for only just a couple of things, when only just vastness of space.

Make it two simple ladders side by side, for only just standing, and next I could be standing on the second step, while also you doing so, for only each ladder,
and for that, just equality for that of the same.

The forgotten word here became that of propensity, only to have it mentioned, for not any inclined, or inclination either.

Just tell me, but only just "=" could be that of an Equation, and for that, perhaps only an excuse, when not making it any Logic instead.

Still just pi, or 3.14, for that of a line versus curve, except not any Algebra we could make it, for only the more complex.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expression

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expression_(mathematics)

Just simple versus complex, and only nature for its meaning, when it also could be purpose as well.

The famous phrase by Einstein, is still that "God is not playing with any dices", and here still not knowing the implied meaning here.

But maybe that he could be only his own master, except for also nature being created, for only such a thing per se.

Make it still all and everything, and next also such for only included, except still not any whole we could make it, for perhaps Creation myth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myth

The provable science we could make it, could be still that of Laws and Equations, except not any stamp we could make it, when also mint.

So here getting to it, that if something could increase for that of size, it could also exceed as well, for only the threshold we also could make it for the same.

Just levels instead, and perhaps more that of Conscience instead, which in the end could make it just "Stairways to Heaven", when only just continuing.

Sadly, our way of sometimes proving for science, could end up just futile, except not any Doubt versus Reason, for only such a thing either.

Only science still at our hands, and next also the thing we could make it, for only seeing, except not any speculative Facts ending nowhere,
for only lack of a similar Conclusion.

Yes, only dirty tricks you could make it sometimes, except only Ideas and suggestions in the previous, for perhaps not any speculation either.

Only making it assume instead, and it looks more pretty to me, only for that, except still not any superlatives we could make it either.

Any assign we could make it, and still only a meaning for such, when perhaps not any describe here, but also that sight could be that of countenance,
when also just ascribe as well.

But next only the bent shape as well, and for that the inclination we could make it, when perhaps not any "inclined" you could make it for a possible Mind either.

Any secret found in a word, and it should also be found or present, except not attribute any meaning for such to those things which could be still a bit eternal,
for only similar meaning.

Any Cause and Effect I could make it, and still the little "=" as well, for only an expression we could make it, except not any attribution for the same,
and here you know that I lost the other word, for only just posted.

If the parents of Jesus went from Nazareth to Bethlehem only because of a Census, also that Josef could have been born in Nazareth as well.

Any Myth we perhaps could make it here, and only history could perhaps tell, except not any life itself for only just an understanding,
when only a Construct for that of possible death.

The real danger here is the mentioned AAA, for which should mean just believers here, at least.

Just leave it off, if not any keep either, and it becomes only the Method of Proof itself, for also the science we could make it,
except also questioning whether even this could be perhaps be flawed, for only mechanism or Thought.

Any basic instinct, for rather attitude instead, and it translates only just wrong, for only just reason instead, when it could be at least reasoning,
when also the deduction we could make it.

Just wait and see, and perhaps not any flawed here either, except rather nature for such, when perhaps making it so,
for only a couple of things which could end up being unanswered.

If perhaps just flawed for only the Design we could make it, except not any intended or intentional either, still just the added theme we could make it,
for only a Creation per se, which could still be telling just everything.

Case closed perhaps, except still not any wait and see we could make it for only our purposes, so here perhaps only an open question for not any answer either.

I better have a break right now, and be back later, because here the coffee is not helping either.

One thing is still that of laurels, while the other could be that of toes, for not stepping on them either.

I do not run any Astropulse here, but at least two became validated, before I got the time to check it out.

So, with respect for ML1 here, which I became a little unfair with, any Chaos theory is just telling about the back and forth you could make it,
for not any end result either, for at least making it time, when only a notion for such.

Just produce could still be a thing to do, when also consume, except that it also could be mass-production as well, and for that, at least the samples you could make it,
for not any Sets either.

After some 16 and a half years here now, my own understanding has widened a little bit, for only those things we could see, for also those things we could also know.

Some reported gaussians for that of score, could be 10 digits or more, but apparently not visible right now, for only a temporary Event.

Are we alone in the Universe, and this could be still the question left unanswered, for not any valid Conclusions we could make of possible reports.

Next pointing a finger at someone, if perhaps not only nature itself, for only its Design perhaps being flawed, and I could next be questioning a possible Creator only for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design

Any implied, and next perhaps Reason at best, for only how you could make it, except not any attitude coming with your personality, for only just science concerned.

Perhaps it could be better being one of the two first ones here, for just AAA, except that the latter could still make you think a little.

Therefore perhaps interesting to know if ML1 could make it any difference betweeen order and symmetry, when only perfect for such,
and the randomness or Chaos that we could be able to observe in nature.

Assuming any both here, for both Design and possible flaw, perhaps you could make it a winner only for such, except not any Matter Creation versus Creation myth here,
but only the Chaos we could make it, for only similar or corresponding Laws.

The problem here is that I do not really know where to look, for only Matter Creation being its own flaw right now, for only just telling, so therefore only such.

Any Intelligence you could perhaps make it, for also Intelligent Design as well, and I also questioned the intended Idea behind only such reflections.

Here almost making it Idea and Thought instead, but should rather be the above instead.

But if rather making it meaning once again, for only my own attitude, I could be guessing that there could be still a Reason behind, for only a Creator,
and that any flaw could therefore be only a watermark or label on a Creation that we could only be able to see.

Assuming rather that a Design could be having its flaw, next not any nature on its own for any perfect either, and it becomes only randomness as a result.

Could we next assume that we could make it any Creator for only the Laws we could know, the answer could perhaps be yes here, in the end.

Any "=" could still be that of "means", or signifies, for also equals, except no such thing that one thing could perhaps be telling about the other, for just only the same,
because still the Fact that any Logic should not be the same as Arithmetic either.

Just Intelligence could perhaps make you just think, except still perhaps not assume anything, for only making it Existence of God instead.

Regardless or whatever, but it could still be the science we could make it for only produce, except still also the Scientific method as well.

But next perhaps the latter just open, for also the possible flaw we could make it for just Proof itself, when also the other three mentioned things as well.

Any investigative detective I could be instead, and next perhaps no such thing as tampering with any Evidence either, because it could only intervene or disturb
the validation process itself, for only a project just in progress.

We know that the Universe is perhaps not any atomic either, for only structure, but that at least it could be Quarks just found,
except perhaps only questioning the meaning of just the smallest for the largest here, when it could be only the smashed pieces of Matter,
for only the crushed infinity instead.

"We built the city", and the Universe once came out of a soup of elementary particles, for only its initial moment of Creation,
except for also the Force of gravity, and next it became the main reason for making it galaxies and clusters of galaxies, only for that.

But only just wait and see, and next we could be polite as well, except for the intelligent signal never coming our way, for only having us to wait.

So here perhaps any stuck Mentality not the same as any naive either, because one thing could be still wearing shoes, except not stuck in a bathtub instead.

Here many examples to be found, and one of these are the gutters for being the ones for such collecting water along the street for next the sidewalk or pavement,
and next having it lead or diverted away.

Really, only just bad wording here, for not any single whole we could make it instead, for only an understanding of nature we could make it,
which should be still that of Laws and Equations, only for such.

Make it still only just the small, and it also becomes details for such, except not any big whole you could make it for only the large instead.

Everything just included, and still that of Concepts for such, when also Ideas and suggestions as well, except not any levels or thresholds for
perhaps only a thought Universe you could still make of.

Therefore still any valid science we could make it sometimes, except also questioning at times as well, for only those things which could be still unknown,
and therefore also unproven.

Those things we still do not know, could also be the unexplained, except perhaps still also the Method of Proof being flawed, for not any Design
we could make it either.

Only making it just "attributable" at times, and next you could perhaps think as well, except not any angels or the like, for only a philosophical context,
when it perhaps could be only Religion as well.

The closest thing we perhaps could come to that of any Realism, for only realization of Facts, could be that of the little sacred "Purgatory", for only mentioned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism

Make it perhaps also our Father as well, and he could be the Creator of the Universe for just everything, when we still could make it Laws and Equations as well.

I went to the Scientific method from that of Quantification, and perhaps should leave it there for the moment.

But if you scroll down to Galileo Galilei a little down, also a bit of wording here that I actually liked, because I thought it was nice,
except that it should be the words of Einstein instead, for "All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it",
when perhaps a little more here as well.

But is it next not so that this method could be an open one, and therefore for a wider understanding as well, for only making it a phenomenon as well?

Could just Proof itself be fallible in some way, except not making it any apple versus trunk, for only just falling?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof

If perhaps not any reality either, what could it be next, when still not any Proof for the same, when perhaps not any nonsense either?

Is Proof for just a Cause, or should it still be just meaning instead, for only what eyes could perhaps see, for next also tell?

Any "no such thing", and still perhaps a sentence for such, except not any proven Fact either, so here we could still be asking what nature is all about.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Again, just tell the truth, for only the truth, except not having the whole sentence here either.

Rather make it distinguished guests instead, for not any indistinguished either, and for that, at least we could be able to separate.

We still could make it just emptiness of space at times, except not the same for 0, or nil, meaning just nothing, except still perhaps not any sentence.

Compare with the Planck constant here, for still only just little, and next we could also invalidate as well, for next not any meaning,
except still not any Constructs instead, which could be making it life versus death.

Here those words of devious, peculiar, cunning, subtle, or quirky, except still not any way of describing, when still only just the unexplained, for also unknown.

If God for some reason was able to use a dictionary, for only just Creation itself, also that he should manage as well, except not any leftover it could become instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_formula

Here I keyed in Propositional act at first, and got to the second one, because thinking there should not be any sentence here either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision-making

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_thinking

Here the bad thing that this should have been mentioned before, if not already done so, because we could also end up with a hierarchical structure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartoon

A little more Politics right now, while I am finishing the other one.

Make it rather masses instead, and if no such thing as "May I present myself" either, your country could still be a flourishing Democracy with a leader still at the helmet,
except for the worst case of Romania in the past, which saw a dictator being overthrown by next its people.

Any gymnastics instead, and we should also know about the female athelete with the pretty face, except any unuck she also could experience,
because if sometimes blunt, also hard as well, and for that discipline as well, except not making it anything inclined either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute

In war, sometimes rules of engagement, only because the unexpected could sometimes be happening, and you could end up firing on your own at worst.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_engagement

Just the perjury you could make, for only a small crime, and next you could become sentenced only for such, except not any warning either.

So, if perhaps a president could be still sitting, for only the impeachable act or offense he may have been carrying out, perhaps an open question here,
because any sentencing should be that of a crime being carried out, and for that, only just the Senate to decide.

Any wrong-doing instead, and it only becomes a separate line for that.

Does it perhaps fall on a majority decision here, and perhaps not any House for such either, because here perhaps the Democrats only for such.

This is perhaps not any farse or circus either, but it rather could be that of questioning whether any legal process could be worth the money.

Could we perhaps copy or replicate nature at times, for also mimicking as well, and next perhaps only a rehearsal needed, for not any real thing either,
but rather that it could be synonymous instead, for not any dominating either.

Just faking, and not any real either, and for that just imagine at times, when perhaps only our senses for such.

Again writing myself off a little once again, but rather that we could still be a product of nature, for only utilizing, or taking use of its available resources,
for sometimes also exhausting as well.

Always the murder, if not any "Murder she wrote" either, but for that also an deliberate act as well, which next has to be judged, for only a sentencing.

Do me a favor, and next it does, except not any sentence you could make it, for only just quantize.

Here that of Quantification earlier on, and here only the shorter word, when only just looking around.

But next just fine, for only making it order of a magnitude at times, except not any stated Fact instead, when only able to produce,
because if perhaps so, it could still only end up with just Proof.

Perhaps I could be confusing that of Concept with that of Conscience, except not any Conceptual we could be making it instead, for only just describing a little,
because Einstein made it just relative for its meaning, except not any relevance for only just Facts.

Here ending up with the word apt, or certitude in the previous, for perhaps only slightly better, except that only intended purpose here could be that of
detecting an intelligent signal coming from space.

If still having the article with my broadcaster in another tab, perhaps still nonsense when only quantifying a little, and for that, just the Planck constant,
except still not any meaning we could make it, for just the meaningless.

Discovering a new particle, and it becomes so with respect to nature, except not any framework we could make it for space itself, when only just an understanding.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument

The first one more meant for its meaning right here, except that it should be still only the smallest of things here as well, for making it just Quarks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

Just "Elementary, Dear Watson", except not any nature for only purpose for just meaning, when we still could think how things should perhaps be.

Perhaps still not any bicycle you could make it, for also a saddle of a horse either, but unless any spitting either, it should not be any graphical cards either.

Just assuming, for perhaps not any asserting either, and still only Equations for such, which you next could also be making Laws, next for only an understanding of nature.

But it still just a sleeve for only just an arm, and next also hiding a little, perhaps not any explanatory Facts for such, when it still could not be explained.

Of course it could be still the Scientific method here, and for that, perhaps no such thing as "Love me tender" either.

Just 9/11 instead, and it could end up being a purposeful act for such, except not any "braveheart" you could make it either.

Perhaps it became a link to a couple of videos being mentioned, and for that guessing that there could be Type II civilizations just to be found at least in the Millky Way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

Just skipping a little once again, and here thinking that the above could be a Construct of sorts, next for nature, while the singularity inside a Black hole,
could be more a product of nature for such, because just assuming one for the other, you could also do so for a Creator, next thinking that there could be Reason behind.

Just universal meaning we could make it at times, and next also a phrase or sentence, except not any "certified" meaning for what it should be either.

You still could be afraid of a couple things, except not any inflict you could make, when sometimes hurt or damage someone, because here even a tribulation at times.

If just no matter could be of any opinion as well, it really should not depend on any matter either, for only the thing you sometimes could be able to deduce.

For that, just stipulate a meaning as well, except not thinking that any hidden structure, should be the same as "Stairways to Heaven" either.

Just express your feelings, for not any hurting yourself either, and for that you could only be a genius, except not any etiquette or Norm for such either,
when only just a wordly expression instead.

The phrase or expression "the Apple does not fall far from the tree", could at least be valid at times, except not telling any Intelligence, from just Newton either.

Just out of order at times, and also the place you could make it, except not any disposition for just the same, and for that, also the little rare word "whence".

Make it just a Christmas tree instead, having just stars or asterisks ("*") for that of contents, and perhaps not any validness, for making it any signal either,
because it rather should be numbers instead, and here binary for such.

For that, just translate at times, and next make meaning of it, which should still be an understandable one.

Following that, it becomes that of imposing as well, for also that of an oblige, making it not only a guessed meaning, but also a presumed one for such,
only because eyes could next see, for also tell.

Here also better " when only just an outcome" in the fourth line just below, but too late to edit.

Again the hurting back here, and also time for the dinner.

We know from the Bible that the Jews became the chosen people of sorts, for only being selected, except perhaps only Hebrew here, for that of language.

But next that Moses was given the Ten Commandments on top of Mount Ararat, except not any finger of God you could be making it for Abraham instead.

Could we sometimes make it just nature for that of dynamic processes right now, when also expecting for just such a thing, when it also could happen?

Any Rationality could still be only that of senses, except not any meaning you could make it for perhaps a Consequence either, when also just an outcome.

Just ligament you sometimes could be making it for a bent knee, except not any Arthritis, for just an illness, and for that, still not any product of nature, for just the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artifact

So here not any dead end street either, for only a Cul de Sac.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6bius_function

Again, still two or more subjects here for the same, except still not any book once standing in the shelf with my parents, for only just invalidating a little.

But next that only just nonsense could be just for a meaning, when only just defined.

Any hope or expectation you still could make it at times, and it also could prosper, for only just wealth, except not any despair, for only just lack of hope instead.

Just two things still, and also that of Contradiction as well, except not the thing which could be infiltrated or intertwined, and here falling short.

Asking, rather than just presuming a couple of times. and perhaps still the Bible you could hold in your hand, when not any justification you could make either.

For that, it could only become a Premise at times, except not any Logical consequence either, because here earlier on, at least synonymous mentioned.

Just this and that, still one thing for just the other, when also vice versa, except the two main Concepts we still could make for nature,
when only just an understanding, together with needed Proof.

Here the scientific God I perhaps could make it, except not any expression written that could be made for the same, when only just stated meaning,

Always the little closer, and also nearer, except not any distant, or farther away, we perhaps could also make it for only the future.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

Here catching only that, for still the longer word meant in the previous, for also tantamount as well, because here that of description as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivation

Here the little warning I also gave, for that of the technical matter of the subject, for only just similar difficulty.

Any bargain and hug, for also the more Welsh "fynd and hug", and next only just a flower for such, except not any Fractal or Mandelbrot set either.

Making it both Ambiguity and Contradiction, for also the Uncertainty Principle as well, and add it next to Proof as well, and next not any God we
could be making it behind the sleeves either, for only just hiding.

Only just a description still, and just Fundamental Laws of physics for the same, when it also could be that of Special Relativity,
except not any piece of cake we could make it, for only just adding a little.

Just slip and fall again, for only the Construct you could make it, and next only Existence for such, when it also could be Existence of God.

If just any middleman could still be only science, for perhaps not only Physics either, who could be next, for perhaps not any sitting either?

Perhaps rather sitting around instead, because here not any dirty either.

Any less instead, and it could be only just little, except not any average you could make it, for only just "mean".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotient

Here it should be Intelligence Quotient or IQ only for such, but here deliberately choosing to leave or kill off the first part.

But if perhaps so, next not any "Humpty Dumpty" you could make for such a thing either, because it could be still that of Intelligence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design

The bad thing perhaps, for rather should note instead, is that this was not my subject here originally, but was having another writer or author behind.

Next I did not catch his or her stated opinion, so therefore left it alone.

If you rather make it mine instead, and perhaps not any slipping or falling either, for rather the flaw we could make it, and next perhaps not any intentional or unintentional either.

Just dismiss, for also disregard, and this could be a thing we could do, except not any nature we could make it for just a purpose either.

For that, still just the Proof you could make it, except not any philosophical Argument for just the other instead, so for that, at least opposite meanings at times,
except not any written expression you could make, for only just a statement.

Still that E=mc2, and for that also an Equation, so here perhaps getting a hand on the subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equation

Only just that, and it still asserts a little, for not any claiming, except that there could also be better understandings just available as well,
when still not any interpretations we could make either.

I forgot enormous when it also could be huge, so not any perfect in the previous either.

Any opinion you still could make it, could also be that of a view, except not any stated Fact you could be making for a "certain" part of nature either.

Just relative, and it could be context versus meaning as well, for only the place where it should belong.

Just everything on its own place here, except not any Sets you could make it, for still just belongs.

And for only just twice, it could also be involved at times, for only inflitrated.

My guess is that the alphabet could be still just a single thing, except not any sentence you could make it, for only just a whole,
when it also should be understandable as well.

So if not making it any Aliquot, for also subset, or aliquot portion, when also partial amount, at times, it became more that of the operators in between here,
for just separating the different elements, because for that, they should be also related with each other.

Just a description once again, for only the written sentence, phrase, or statement you could make it, and perhaps not any single word or meaning, when just only context either.

Perhaps taking it for granted a couple of times, and it becomes Logic once again, except not any "means", for just only meaning.

Only knowing that it sometimes "is", for just exists, and next also certain Fact as well, except still not any downstairs versus upstairs, for only just slipping and falling.

Here just different Theories at times, when also different meanings, except not any same or different view or opinion you could make it, for only a given context.

For that, just belongs, and once again it becomes that of Sets again, when not any alternative explanation either.

But still just the "inclination" you sometimes could make it for just attitude, when not any AAA for just that either, except only a given certitude we could make it just for meaning,
when only just the Universe.

Here at the end of the post, also making it that of compare, or comparing, when also that of comparativeness, because here not any binding mechanism either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design

And here only a spoken meaning for such, when I am not able to make it any better.

If the server could be having a couple of problems, only blame me for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole

Here waking up again for an article with my national broadcaster about Black holes in space, and their importance for nature.

One thing could be making it infinity for that of Mathematics, while the other just for nature, so here I will need to return back for that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity_(mathematics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cusp_(singularity)

If most people do not know about the singularity existing or being found at the centre or heart of such an object, make it rather a galaxy of our own, for just living in.

To us a little more experienced, it becomes a question of whether this could have been inherited from only just Mathematics. or rather we could make it a Topological model.

Of course it could be nice just making it gravity one of the Fundamental Forces of nature, but one of just thinking of it, could be Newton, while the other Einstein.

So, if perhaps not only one such thing, and next "that's it", we could make it shapes and figures as well, for only the parts or elements of nature we could see,
as well as proportions for the same, when only related to given space.

Apparently time comes to a standstill inside a black hole for only the Force it represents, but except perhaps not any caveat either, it could always be weak versus strong.

Any substance you still could make of it as well, perhaps could tell about the idiot versus genius as well, except not any theoretical model of physics,
which could make us able to prove.

So, whether or not, or regardless you sometimes could be making it "Wonders of nature", it could always be that of cleverness, skill, or craftmanship,
for only being able to come up with something, and here it could also be that of Design.

Just the little thing, and next also the large thing as well, and it becomes huge, for both size and complexity, when also given proportions as well.

Sometimes light could be diminishing, for only subsiding, if not making it just a variable star, but also that it could be increasing as well, for only exploding in size.

Any "Sex, lies and videotapes" you still could make it, and it also could end up broken parts as well, for only just "smithereens", except no such thing as Rationality,
for only making it an absolute, or even fundamental meaning.

Only just skill, and next also purpose as well, and for that I could still question nature for only its purposeful meaning, when sometimes purported as well.

The reason we sometimes still could not prove any Religion, is because of the separate opinions being found or present, for only alternative views,
but next that this could also be true for other conditions of nature, where there could be still different things.

Just only related to each other, for only being similar, and next not any different either, when it just could be any size, for not similar opinion we could make either,
so here at least proportional for such, if not any relative either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object

But again, that any infinity we could make it, perhaps not any end of a journey either, for only just going to the Moon, because any Construct you could make it instead,
it should be more that of just peace and Mind, for sometimes the Soul we could make it for a final outcome.

Just layers and layers once again, and we could be back at Topology again, except not any reference point we could make with any philosophical Argument either.

Any middle we could end up making it, and perhaps only meeting at the middle, for the opinions we could sometimes have, for also express or write.

So if still perhaps only a Conclusion you could make it at times, it should only be for that of subject itself, by means of the reference for it only,
except still not any "Wonders of nature" we could make it, for only in order to just describe.

Any part still you could make of it, and next also that of a whole as well, which could still be that of infinity for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meaning_(linguistics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_model

The first link could end up just dead in the water, for only basic or simple, while the other could still lack any Proof, for only just the Argument you could be making it instead.

Any "Allegiance" or the like, for just the similar you could make it, and perhaps still only a reference point for such, except not any "absolute" you still can not prove.

Just validity or validness for a given Conclusion, and always wondering what could be coming first, except not any Certainty for just Fact, when still only just a Proof.

If it became unclear which way around it should be formulated or expressed, also that of finite versus indefinite we sometimes could not make for any sentence either.

Any fish versus meat instead, and it could become a delicacy for only just a thing you could eat, except not a thing you sometimes could only choose.

Or, more or less.

Anyway, substance again, for only just a thing being given.

Ding-ding!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantification

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vulgarism

What more to be said?

Too many sticked or locked threads just above, for only my own opinion, and it does not help science any much either, for also further.

Number crunching.

Always that of "betterment", so here that of shell was not the word initially chosen or preferred either.

But next that I could also be here for science as well, except not any prayman I could be either.

Just "Mission impossible", for also possible as well, and we always should know what at least one thing could mean here.

Just one thought possibility (for not any impossibility either), and it could be the aggrandizement or extol coming with possible sadness, when only that of death.

Any part versus whole, and still only the Earthly sciences for such, when also natural, when at least explaining for a given purpose, except not necessarily any more.

Any frontiers for also barriers, and we know that there could be certain limits for that of nature, when also given constraints.

Any Genesis creation initiative instead, and perhaps not any enough, at least when it comes to me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_narrative

Just look instead, and next this should also be the preferred Method, except not perhaps thinking about Darwin here, and his way to only choose.

If Darwin could be perhaps right, next also Einstein could be wrong, for not either of these two being just the same, for only stupendously wrong.

Next kill off any science at its feet, for only the heels it could be standing on.

We know that science could be that of a whole for just intent or meaning, except not any certitude we could be making for the same.

If it really is that of a process for only such a meaning, and next you are welcome, for still not any Religion included, or coming along.

Always the "enough said", if perhaps needed, or necessary, except not the other Fact I still could be making it for that of science.

If it sometimes could be rooted as well, except still not making it any Reason for just knowing, when also that of whereabouts as well, at least that for just a Fact.

So, where is next my glasses, except not writing from any manuscript either?

Yes, that shell, and next for not any meaning, when also making it spiders as well, for also the ladybug as well, for only caring about a couple of aphids,
for next not any self.

But next, wit - humor, and next also a bit of slant for such as well.

Did I next see the face of God for just an intended meaning (Logic if you will) and the answer could be still no, for not any categorically so.

Here that of expressed meaning versus implied meaning, and next Implication for that or such, except not any explicit either.

Maybe just an expression, except still not any "curiosity killed the cat", for not any could or wished either.

Just "Law and Order" instead, and for that, we could be making it Certainty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty

If you happen to be sitting in a plane at times, also a seat as well, for only feeling comfortable, except also rejecting a little at times.

So why any rejecting, when it rather should be rejection instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

Keying in just "philosophical" before or previous here, and it becomes the wrong order here as well, and perhaps should be fixed.

But rather just "mint" instead, for only the supefluous or spectacular, and perhaps not any such thing either, just for that.

Some could think that it perhaps could be Religion, while others perhaps science instead, except not any "no man's land" instead,
for ending up just at the middle.

If I could end up suppose, for also propose, that a couple of rays still visible, could be still the two-part science we could make it,
for also God in the middle, when only our Creator, "that's it, when only just an answer, except still not any questions asked either.

But next also "profound" as well, when still only guessing, except not making any dirty tricks for just the same.

So just watching a couple of videos here, next by myself, except not making it any recognition versus realizing either.

Make it only one alternative, for not any other or second one either, and you could be still having the London Philharmonic Orchestra.

Just "quasi" could end up making it just stellar, except not any "fabulous" either.

Only that of a materialistic world at times, for only the items we could manufacture or produce, also the immaterial world as well,
which could be making no sense at times.

Just profound at times, and it could be still sense as well, except not any senseful will, when rather purpose for meaning instead.

We know that it went past even Einstein a couple of times, for also a bit of Uncertainty as well, when still also a lack of ability to conclude,
when we perhaps do not have the answer either.

Just drizzle instead, and next take a thing for granted, except not any "how" or "why" for the way it could be doing so.

You know, but being scientists, we could sometimes be skeptical, for also debunkers as well, but not this time, for only 20 years or more of experience.

Let words be just words, and next the other things coming at me, for only just a simple flow.

We know for only just thinking (and not any particle physics) that it sometimes could be that of aggrandizement or extol, only because you
could "believe" in something.

But next also hate or hatred as well, except not any grandious or spectacular you could be making for science itself, when only just nature.

Just throw it off, for also away as well, except not any ashtray you could make it for only just vomiting, when still only just marvelous,
for the spectacle you sometimes could make it.

Questioning any God, for only a possible Creator, and perhaps not any nature itself, for only just meaning, when it could be still only explained.

Here perhaps fathom for not any destiny, when also the other word for this, except for only the simple word "perjury" coming up with me.

Maybe just "Phantom of the Opera" once again, for not being any illusoric, because for that, not any "grotesque" either, when only just an act.

Questioning science for that of meaning, and it also becomes possible meaning, for only just mentioned, except not making it any query
for only just a sentence.

Some people choose to "ramble" through the sky, except still not any hallucinogenic for that of the same, when only just LSD.

Oh, are you supposed to believe in any God for just meaning, or should you still rather just think instead?

Just less, and next meaning less, except not any more you could make it, for just "betterment".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantification

What next, if I may ask, except only checking here myself?

Any broad and wide, and next also shell as well, for perhaps not any wide open, or forgiving either, for only that of senses.

But next take it for granted, when only just being, except still not any thinking, and perhaps only Religion for such.

Except that it sometimes does not matter either, and for that, just only Duh!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_science

Also a couple of YouTube video links as well, and once again, mentioned earlier, for only please tell, if you are not able to get at it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp2wu1f2Uqc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2ZeYJXYhjI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExxzG98hnGw

Next, always the same, of course, except not the other thing I could make it either.

Any result, and next also result-oriented for just the same.

You know, for only my way home back from the shop today, stopping by the garage, next around the corner from the public road,
into the one which could be a private one at just the other end, separated by a concrete barrier.

Next the little lady, quite small in size, asking if she could be of any assistance or help, and next I said no, for only a short distance left.

Is that just polite, or could it rather be curiosity instead, because next, or afterwards, just thinking that it could be only the little soul here,
for only asking for the help she could provide, and next also sincere.

It really angers me, because I also had bad experiences with some people, except still the little unknown, for also unfamiliar, when only asking for such a thing.

"I beg your pardon", and next also kneel for such a thing, except not making it any darling either, of course.

If such a thing as honesty could sometimes be read by only just lips, perhaps still not any kiss either, when it only could be a darling for just an excuse.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Float

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic

Maybe "row your boat" instead, because I think it became the thing said, when also got, for just the same, and for that, just selfish, as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka

Before I go, here betreger a little down, for at least OMG here.

Should it perhaps be better to just believe, except only science for such, when not any Religion either, when I still could be making it Quality assurance as well?

So here just my "own" meaning, except not anything we could guess either, and still the proven Facts needed for only telling the Truth,
except that I made it perhaps Fact for only the end of a sentence earlier on, except still not any Truth.

Just "Money for nothing", and you could end up going Bankrupt, for not any defunct you could make it either, for only just a word.

Rather just knowing for certain instead, and we could also know, except still not any Method for just science, which could be submitting or disclosing
any Evidence, without any Court needed for such a thing either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symposium

Here perhaps not any London Philharmonic Orchestra for any symphony either, but rather that it should be that of a disputation or defense, for also
dissertation, defense of thesis, or public defence for such a thing, because I already mentioned the conductor.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra#symphony_orchestra

Next point a finger at me for only just telling, except maybe just the top above, for also any bold or daring I could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stunt_performer