留言板 :
Cafe SETI :
Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
留言板合理
前 · 1 . . . 27 · 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 . . . 202 · 后
| 作者 | 消息 |
|---|---|
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
And the borking computer makes for quite a bit of hang, except that of choosing for just an alternative, when you also could make a selection for the same. Just Imagination for your senses, and perhaps not any flesh for such you could make it, when still not any food either. Only just to choose, for not having any meaning either, perhaps you should rather wish instead, for only the mercy or bliss you could make it, and next the "Stairways of Heaven" for just the same, except not any demise or oblivion, for just same meaning. So here maybe not any "Options galore" you could make it, but rather a preference you could make it, when still not having any choice. I checked in with the word "resentment" here, when also complacency as well, when perhaps not making it any assumed meaning for only a guess, when still the same words you could be using, just for meaning. Love from God perhaps, and next also the bliss and mercy you could make it, for also forgiveness as well, except not any perdition instead, for only becoming lost, and for that you only could end up in Hell. Just "noname" instead, for also Faceless coward as well, and we could still make it only a brutal world for such, when only facing reality. But rather select instead, for also choose as well, and still the God you could make it for that of love and compassion for such, when not any sacrifice instead, for just the oblivion you could make it. Any confession instead, and perhaps also the damnation you could make it as well, when still only the Devil left to choose, for not any mercy still. Just the "self" I could be making it here, and next not any pointing of a finger for just any Creation you could make it, but rather that it should be at least one outcome. So here the ordered Set I perhaps could make it, and next also squares for also rectangles just inside, except not any circle, for just the other thing, when still not any circumference you could make it, for just the whole thing. Maybe I should skip the dinner right now, and just have the beer instead, because here perhaps a little better. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empty_set https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_number Just count to three, for not any -1, 0, 1 you could make it, for also +1, and for that the empty Set as well, for not any tumbleweed either. Here the deep low subsided a little, but the wind coming from the north is still continuing, dumping quite a lot of snow. I guess these could be still factors of nature as you could make it, except not any tears for just the brutality it could be at times. Just lights being turned on instead, and perhaps only the Moon for such, except that any vicious you could make it, should be more personality and Mind. Here only the add-on you could make it for life itself when also present, when still respect for nature next on its own, for that of its presence. Question any life, and still the reason versus meaning you could make it, for next also Anthropology as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology So here not any Theology or Religion just now, for only waiting with that, when it could be just a gorilla instead, for the hairy chest it could be having, together with much black hair, for only just insulation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla Any questioning about whether Darwin was wrong, and perhaps still true, except not the other purpose you could make it, for only Intelligence being part of life. Just diversity, for also manifold, and next the two-fold or part we could make it for just thinking for that of one thing being governed by just another, except not any dominant either. Always the Forces of nature you could make it for just one given thing, except not any Credo you could make it for still the other, when only perhaps Belief for such. Only just laughter and ridicule you could make it, and perhaps still knowing where one thing should go or belong, except not any vice versa for that of respective either. Any big question you could make it, and still only the Aspect you could make of it, except not any philosophy instead, for only questioning that of ourselves, with next any nature you could make it instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_narrative Here only to separate a little, for perhaps only Theology instead, except for still the philosophical Argument you could make it, for only just God, because we still should not forget the Scientific method either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology The problem here is just that of which one for only such, when not knowing which way to go, for making it just the one thing or another, for only a good example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle So here just the open book I could make it, for not any closed either, and I could readily assume, that it should be science for only just meaning, except not any Looking glass for just a mirror instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror Hope you catch the meaning here, because here it should not be about the mirror itself, but only the way of approach you sometimes could make it. Of course I still could make it the Purgatory for only the most sacred, except not any believe you could make it, when perhaps also proving as well. paramount - ubiquitous For that, still the context you could make it only for such, when also the provable science you could make it as well. Just thinking that learning and teaching could be still two different things, also the abilities we could make for the same, when also disabilities as well. Only for such, you could end up sitting in a chair, for not any frightened instead, when it should not be any "Beauty and the beast" either. Always the Instantiation you could make it for just the Big Bang, and therefore not any Myth you could make for such, when not any Mystery either. Just part versus whole, and next only infinity for such, except still not any 0 or nil, for just the empty Set instead. If a cube of ice could still melt, it becomes only water for such, but next crystals here at first, for only the shape you could make it, except not any floating either. Just meant for a meaning, and perhaps also intended purpose for such, except not any assign or allocate instead, for just the better word, namely ascribe. Here that of Einstein, for "God is not playing with any dices" is coming to me as well, because here perhaps not any Laws just for a purpose either. Only just bother at times, and it also becomes caring for such, except not any forget you could make it, for only just intended. Could we make it God just the Creator of just everything, and also he should be a supreme Being only for such, except only forgetting about physical Laws, for perhaps not any meaning either, for only just implied. Any weather, and still brutal for such when it only happens, but next not any reference you could make it with any earthquakes either, because a feather could be still falling at speed, for not any soft touch against the skin you could make it either. Ready, set, go, and still the cook you could be for such, except not any Instantiation you could make it instead, for only just Reason behind as well. Any tumbleweed you still could make it, and only lumps of ball you could make it, except not any clustering of galaxies instead, for just making it likelihood of life, for only its presence. Make the door still wide, for also broad, and next the philosophical Anthropology you could make of it, and next only just good, except for only the wrangling we could make for ourselves, when only coming up with some simple answers at times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_anthropology Just the pure we could make it, for also clean as well, still the Divinity we could make it for that of an issue, when also gods and angels as well, except not any Paranormal instead, for only just Mysteries and Magic for just nature, when also Miracles as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranormal The lack of Belief you could have, for only just missing, does not necessarily make it for the Devil instead, but only that a bliss you could make it, should also be that of a release as well. Any versus you still could make it, and next only one thing to choose for only two different subjects, when it could be only the salvation you could make it, for not any condemnation either. devotion - sacrifice - mercy - lovingkindness love - affection - sanctuary Of course not getting to it, but you always could take it God for just meaning, when that of just above, because here perhaps not your way only to choose, when only the death you could make it, for only a sacrifice. Just beg instead, and perhaps not any pray either, but I guess you should not be asking the Devil for the same, when still only that of of choosing, next for any good. You could still make it "Our Father" only for such, when the release you could make it for not any sacrifice, except that of only just choose, when also out of words. I could try editing it a little at first, because here perhaps the word "complacency" above. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
And here perhaps thinking about taking a nap before continuing, because here a bit of wind and snow right now. I will make some ten tasks active for that of running, but here the main computer is almost dead right now. Here it should have been a more powerful processor, for only the graphics cards, but here not any table I could put it on either. Anything having to deal with a water-cooling system, for also liquid as such, needs special experience or capacity, and here no such thing available. Only just one memory card inserted, for still 16 GB, and it needs a bit of care and thought only for such, to avoid possible errors. Read what it says at the main board here, for only Seti@home science when it becomes "Life in the universe, radio SETI, and SETI@home's search for ET" only for that, and next not forgetting that either. In just one way or another, we tend to make it Politics at times, for also other things as well, except not any debunker you also could be, for also a Skeptic at times, but only just pretend instead, for perhaps only make it, it only becomes science for such, when also the nonsense we also could make it. I guess it could be an Illusion at times, for only what we could make it, but rather being illusoric instead, you could just end up disillusioned as well, for maybe only just lack of Facts. So therefore still the science we could make it, except also blame ourselves for any results still lacking, because any Evidence you could make it, should be still that of Proof as well, and here apparently lacking such a thing, for perhaps only enthusiasm for such. But if still the beer inside the fridge right now, for not any working, also the bit of soar eyes as well, for only the gusts of wind coming in from the sea. |
|
artiggutt 发送消息 已加入:30 Mar 09 贴子:157 积分:1,403,337 近期平均积分:0 |
Maybe just pull up an old one at the start here, because our Speedy here is making it 500 kwh/month in the other thread. Here a lamp above my table is 40 W, and should be drawing a consumption measured in perhaps voltage instead, for some 220-240 V of household. If you add to it the amperage as well, for only the strength of the power being delivered, a recent power outage saw only a gusty yellow, for that of lights. For my living room, typically a 10 Amp fuse here, except the push button in the closet, replacing any manual fuse for only the rest, and here the hot water tube in the bathroom, as well as the stove in the kitchen up at the highest, for that of 60 Amp. So here not any fixed bill of course, but rather varies with how much is being used, or consumed. Could anyone tell me what is the more important here, for that of voltage versus amperage next measured over time, because when only winter for just cold, it still means the bill for such, because I guess that a lightning strike could still blow a fuse, for only just an overkill. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
So where to put the comma perhaps, when only just two in a row. Should tell that the link for that of Egoism, was not meant for any reference here, by just thinking it could be a Janus face versus a moniker or Allegory, but rather that it became added instead, for only a separate subject. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nymph Any wheels inside wheels for what you could make it, except not Ezekiel either, and perhaps not any prosaic either, when only just a watch for having wheels inside. Any "stubborn" you next could make it, and next perhaps so with respect to nature also, except not any sense you could make it for only purpose or meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Babylon Here not any verses you could make it either, but surprisingly, the modern Iraq of today, as we only happen to know it. Only just sense and composure, for only the closest I could get at it, except not any consideration for only just an Idea, when only making up a meaning, Does it, or does it not, and next a meaning for that of the same, when also an explanation needed. Just "believe" in a couple of things, and you could also think as well, except not proving that such a thing could be any flying machine, and next becoming the thing he saw. Only a chain of the link, and it always becomes the weakest point, except not any witness you could make it for any testimony, when still only that of proving. Just take the whole thing for granted, except not any Idea, and it could be still the Universe in front of us, for also a notion of time we could make it. I guess it could be accomplished at times, for just only fulfilled, except not any purpose for meaning, when also taking it for granted, when only the Universe for such. Here we perhaps do not need to make it any philosophical Argument for only our purposes, except that time travel could be still possible, for only given properties of space. Just "betterment" instead, and perhaps not any ants for such we could make it either, when it rather should be aliens or extraterrestrials instead, for only just means to prove, except still the purpose versus meaning we could make it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise Here is the big business we sometimes could make it for both Arts and Literature, except not any Technology either, when still only the fathom or bosom for only just the hands you could be holding. Only change direction instead, for that of speed versus travel, and next not any "skew" we could make for such a thing, except that it sometimes could change position for that of place, when still only direction for such, except not any relative we could make it. I guess it could be still only "Wonders of nature" you could make it, except still only prove as usual, but if rather Concept instead, for not any Proof you could make it, guessing here that it could still go wrong, for only the "Stairways to Heaven" you could make it, except only science itself. Just laughter and ridicule, for not any annoyance you could make either, and we should know about the Skeptic and debunker, for only possible meaning. Dinner served, and for that only the dish, except not any speculation you could make it, for sometimes only the same purpose or meaning. The religious Aspect you could make it, could be still that of gods and angels, for also that of Divinity, except our intended purpose here, for only detecting extraterrestrial Intelligence across the sky, for only the sole purpose that we may not be any alone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carving Just repeating myself, for not going any wrong either, because here thinking about the Stone age man, for only the painting he could make on the wall. Always the filled up for that of a stomach, when also a refreshment for such, because here still stars and galaxies all across the sky, for only being strewned, except not any purpose for rather fulfillment instead, when it rather should be achievements for only the goals you are seeking. For that, still the measure you could make for just you and me, except not any Universe for the same, when still only scales versus size. Perhaps we also could make it a certain condition for only being set, except not any Cardinality for the same, when it only could be that of Sets. Here not any finished, but just past 11 AM here, and should be doing the shopping, before the weather starts coming in. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
The following became posted at PrimeGrid for only yesterday, and here will continue shortly, for not any flipover for just contents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplicative_inverse Also found or came across this, for only just a little more coffee here. The problem is that for just 50/50 resource share, a little more goes to Seti@home for only the guess I could make it at times, for not any Scientific method either. Here just sensing that this could be having quite a lot of possibilities, except not knowing which ones for perhaps only prime numbers here. When I notice the graph here, first thinking that if could be just Arithmetic, for that of Mathematics, if not making it any learning curve for only skill or lesson either. But next correcting myself, for rather Integrals instead, where perhaps a curve could be a Normalization of sorts, for perhaps not any Statistics either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral But next should tell that I had not thought about that either, at least in this way only. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology Keying in Chronological sequence, for only the thing it becomes, and it rather becomes Order instead, redirecting back at the above, for only the frames we could make it for that of the similar. Just a tribute for not any tribulation, because here that of Normalization for that of Databases you could make it, except not any bell for just a shape, when only a gaussian curve for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution Definitely he was a quite good, clever, or skilled Mathematician for only what he was doing, but when I am stumbling around for only wording, also the word "efficacy" here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficiency The problem, if not just the discussion at the other place, could be that of measuring for only scales and sizes, if not any dimensions either, and for that a similar measurability. Adding just an Uncertainty into the picture, for only two parts of the subject next to it, namely Ambiguity versus Contradiction, and some people could make it just Cause and Effect, for only a given understanding. Any "one step closer" you could make it, and perhaps 321 only for such, except not any stairs or ladder you could climb up or down either. But keying in Reciproc instead, and only back at the top here, for the first link, because when only at Integral here, it should also be integrand as well, and here a bit down in the text. I guess you could still draw a curve for not any line you could make it, but for some reason, also becoming that of Normalization as well, when perhaps only a mean or average instead, for just Statistics. Needs checking here, for not being any sure, and also I am not any Database expert either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial Two different subjects here, are they not, except only a curve for still both here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality Here both square and rectangles inside the box, as you may be able to see. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_set For just Sets above, here that of Polygons inside an Euler diagram, and here should tell that it became new to me, for not being seen before, except knowing about Venn diagrams. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_diagram Quite good and interesting here, for also that of making it Probability as well, for perhaps not only rolling a dice for such, but also a "Probabilistic equation" instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram Perhaps flipping it around, for only better known, except also that of "representation" coming at me, for just only being given. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number Here noting that just Cardinality could be implied for only that of Sets, except also the number you could make for it as well, for not any Ordinal either. And of course only forgetting one thing here as well, but could perhaps be guessed at here, for only just reading, because here only just a Thought being made. But really, for not any "Abstract" you could make it here, for only Objects instead, at least squares and rectangles here only for such, except not any circles you could make it either. Again the flipover just above, but not doing it here, for only the borking computer. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
And if not any delete you could make it either, it only becomes a purge for such when only needed, for next that of tasks. Here a big storm coming in from the Atlantic right now, and if getting at the crampons for my worn shoes, for only ice in the street, I could try doing so when past 11 AM or so, only to have it done. Right now the wind picking up here, and it becomes those gusts of wind that could vary or differ from the forecast for that of an average, which in my opinion could be much too low at times, for only making it a strong breeze. So while the low could be churning its way for only direction and barometric pressure, those winds coming along could at least be gale for such, if not any storm or hurricane either, for just severe. Here new shoes being purchased, but still in the box for that of the package, so here also shoelaces needed as well. Any salt for that of taste, and perhaps only sugar instead, except only crystals for the same, when perhaps not any mineral either. Just sorry to say, is perhaps not the same as any sorrow for only just being felt, because here someone could be losing either mother or father, for only a sense of grief, when also pain being felt. So if not any "Good morning America", for just the same, and next the scissors for perhaps only a fireplace, when also a chimney needed to avoid smoke. If I could be still only a product of nature, for only being so, perhaps no need for any testify either, because for that it could be also a judgement as well. Here not any landscape for only a Universe we could make of it, except for also an unfolding of sorts, which could mean at least Events taking place. Any scorched you could make it instead, and for that it becomes only a fire burning, except that it could also consume everything in its way. So therefore not any nuisance you could make it, but rather almost a plague instead, for just affecting citizens being involved. Therefore, almost Hell on Earth for what you could make it, except not any frostbite instead, for only living at the North Pole. The part of it we could be making some two things, could be still having both things to offer, for only just a waiver instead, if not any exclusion or renunciation you could make it either, because here perhaps not any Sins versus forgiveness, for also mercy as well. Anyway, just Matter Creation versus Creation myth here, for not any things you could make it either. The best thing to be offered, for also having, is that of pure water, except not any damp you could make it, for just only boiled or cooked, because the Sin you could be making it, should still be only dirty tricks for such. Just hardship could be still part of Earth for only just living, and therefore you still need the cooker for only the cup of hot coffee. Rather "In the flesh" instead, and perhaps not any Celibacy for such either, when only the pork food you could be making it, except the Jews, for only the Hebrew language they are speaking, making such a waiver here. Leave it with only a torch instead, for not any previous word either, and next it became lost, for still only the firestorm raging at places. Any interpretation you could make it for that of nature instead, should be in such a context, for only the Concept you sometimes could make it, and for that, you also could just believe at times, for only making it Belief, when also Faith as well. Only just natural causes instead, for that of Events still happening, and either you could just take it for granted, when not always any expected either. Just nice for that of the weather, and it could be fine as well, except not any Janus face for only just a flipover, when perhaps only bad or ugly instead. So here perhaps either/or for just a couple of things, except still no thing being the same for just opposite either, when only two different things. Meaning that any fine or nice weather you could make it, should not be any stormy either, for also vice versa, when just at the same time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrast Just stark contrast I could make it for a meaning, and perhaps also ugly or mean for such, except not any nice or clean it could be instead, except for any colors you could make it. Here a couple of words passing my way, for only being lost or forgotten, except for perhaps only Religion just for meaning, when perhaps only believing, when we rather should prove instead, for only just science. Proving any Miracle you just could make it for science, and next also science for only just meaning when only "foot" for such, for only standing, except not any Scientific method you could make instead, for only a bit of senses. We know that the top point you could make it for a rollercoaster, should not be any end point either, for only just a needle of a pin instead, except only the notion of infinity instead, for not leading anywhere else. Just the realm you could make it, for also framework as well, and still science for that of meaning, when also nature for a given context. Only think that it should be still for meaning, and the wind could be still blowing, for not any torch instead, for just a firestorm only just raging. Making it just a difference instead, and perhaps only indifference for such, except not any absolutes you could make it, for only just showing up. Nature could be still present for only the answers it could give or offer, except for its display for only churning around a little, and next the weather. Only infinity perhaps for just one explanation that could be given, and next just Sins, for only the mercy or forgiveness that could be given. And here perhaps a face only for such, when still not any God versus Devil you could make it, if not any worse either. Maybe just the visualization you could make it for that of a display, except not any face for just standing in front of you, for the sense you could make it, because if just a knock instead, you should at least feel it, except not any pity or sympathy for just the same. Just a true or genuine Dream instead, and you could be dislocated or unhinged from any sense of reality, for only the vivid you could make it, and still not any reality, for only just a sense. The finger of God you could be making of only Adam for such, should not be any Creation of the Universe for the same, because here rather Instantiation instead. Just swear to God for only the Allegiance you could make it, and next not any Devil for just the same, when at least no mercy or clemency either. Here the weakness you could make it at times, for not any hard either, because nature could be still that of opposites or differences, when next not only just for meaning either. Spelling it wrong perhaps, and it should be rather opposite here, for also the inverse or converse you could make it. If rather cubits instead, still only one thing versus the other you could make it, and for that, just science alone, because if rather "From here to Eternity", which way next to go? Here I made it the circle of the sun the other day, and next rays coming from it, and guessing that this could be just all we could make of it, for only what it could represent. Just leave it alone, for perhaps already mentioned, except not any degree for such either, because either still Intelligence for that of a subject, for also the Comprehension we could make it for the Universe, because here still only that of life versus death, except not any initial moment you could make it. Only just glory, for also the aggrandizement or extol you could make it, and just worshipping for such, except not any forgiveness you could make it. Here still perhaps only the Saint, for not any St. Peter either, and the glorification you could make it of Heavens, for only pureness or purity, except not any blame for just a Sin you could make it, and next end up in Hell. Logic could still be that of Truth for the same, except not any "good" versus evil you could make it instead. Does it next happen, for just only exist, or could it only be the invisible meaning for not any sense either? Those dramatic effects we could be making of nature, for only results for such, should not mean any pointing of a finger either, when only just someone to blame. except rather the Allegiance you could make it, for only just believe. Only just Forces of nature instead, and perhaps still just the weather, for not any earthquakes either, when still both the Weak and Strong Force we could make it, for that of Interaction. Just key in "Science limited", for still not any limits you could make it, for also borders or frontiers as well, and it becomes only poor wording here. Here the moniker we could make it for also an Allegory as well, except only just thinking that it could represent, when still only just for something. Still the Alien Interview we could be making for just the same, except not any proving, except the finger still pointing at you, for only Allegiance instead. Only blow in the wind, for also the torch we could make it, and next also the weak and strong we could make it, except only the opposite each time. In fact, if only getting cold, it could be a bit of frost as well, and only for that, a frostbite as well. Stretching any limits, and it also becomes capacity for what we could make it, except not any beyond, for only just Comprehension instead. Just some kind of meaning, and perhaps only the annoyance we could make it, except not any God hidden in the sleeves, for only purpose or meaning. Rather prick instead, for not any pointing or blame for such, when still not any meaning, because here that of just take it for granted instead, when only a Dream for such. I guess it could still slide for only the bowling ball you could use, except not any rollercoaster either, except not any meaning we could make it, for just pricking. Either just meet at the middle for only the place you could make it, and here perhaps only a handshake for such, except not any transition you could make it, for that of next or another, and here lost the word. Maybe just the Illusion you could make it, for not any reality either, and still only illusoric for such, when next not any Dream either, because here not any Eternity you could make it either. The straight line you perhaps could not make it at times, could be just a long way to go, except not any twisted for cumbersome either. Just a curve instead, for not any curly hair either, when still only the interface you could be making it for that of layers. Here getting at least to that of "transient" for that of a word, except not any albino you could make it, for just an appearance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albinism Very sad when it only happens, and sometimes could be showing up in hair or face, for only just pure white. For that, not any smile you could make it, except still only words to describe, when not any Equations just for nature instead. Just life and death for only a Consequence, for also the moniker or Allegory as well, except still not any "think" for just meaning, when we rather could make it a Creator instead. We still could make it "To be or not to be", except not any "is" either, except that it perhaps could be Consequence, for only just purpose and meaning. Perhaps intent instead, and it could be intentional for such, except not any "self" you could make it for only a face, when perhaps not any reference either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egoism Make it only that of God instead, and the word "adherence" is coming at me here, except only loosing out a little, for not any compliance either. Just the Universe being created for only the face of God for such, and perhaps just Adam here, for only a finger, except not any "self" you could make it, for only a reference. Just come along instead, for only being with me, except not any Universe you could make it instead, for that of everything being included. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coincidence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality Always the reason we could make it just for meaning, except not any relationship or connection, for also correlation or conjunction, because if everything put together instead, it becomes that of causation. More when back from the shop later on. |
|
artiggutt 发送消息 已加入:30 Mar 09 贴子:157 积分:1,403,337 近期平均积分:0 |
https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=3794474862 Here at the moment of writing, for 75 tasks still waiting to become validated, for also 86 tasks already being validated, and receiving credit. Or perhaps making it workunits instead, for only separating a little, making it a difference. Here it became also 86 tasks already been validated, from I guess at least a Quorum of two, meaning two valid tasks. The needed minimum Quorum is as usual two, for that of reported tasks, where also initial replication is supposed to be two. Clicking on the first one, for that above, and it becomes valid for both tasks, meaning that the validator should be hard at work after the maintenance, just catching up with it, and get it valid altogether for a single workunit. Doing the same with the next four workunits in the task list, mine got reported, but have to wait for my wingman here. The minimum Quorum is supposedly what is needed for only just validation, meaning that it could be taking place. So here my fingers not working at past 5 AM in the morning, but only that I am guessing that the validator should get at the finished workunits in due order, for only having it validated, meaning those with two valid results. If still the 75 tasks waiting for validation, for also some having valid results for both tasks, you still have the download versus upload as usual, for also the making of new tasks, while also reporting. There are supposedly more issues relating to this, and one thing could be the transitioner, if perhaps not the feeder instead, so here still that of balancing it a little, while the reporting deadline is also quite generous. Here that a couple of tasks could be having two valid results for only being reported, but still waiting for validation itself, for only just credit, while others still the wingman, as already mentioned, and here not any difference for only display of task itself. So here on the spot making it backlog, if one part of the system should fall behind, and next it becomes only a wait for such. Am I right here for only just thinking, or should I rather make it others to decide, for not the system itself, because here not about the credit. Perhaps not my business here either, so therefore returning back to the other stuff, when back from the weekend shopping. |
|
artiggutt 发送消息 已加入:30 Mar 09 贴子:157 积分:1,403,337 近期平均积分:0 |
Merry Christmas to you Raistmer! Here unpulling the power plug for that of the laptop when checking, and the running CUDA task gets Waiting to run, for not any suspended when active either, because here not willing to run on just the battery either. If still not any graphics, for only a CUDA task, do you think that it does the initial calculation each time, when only restarting again? Here unable to see or notice, but should be the FFT transform here, for also other things as well. Stay well! |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
Perhaps only repeating myself here, for only the Belief I could make it, when just believe, for also believing, because if only just ransacking a house, for only its belongings, I think even that was mentioned. Any "stubborn" Facts you perhaps make it, and next only Moses, for that of being given the Ten Commandments, for not any offered either, except for no such thing as being only slaves, for only living together with other people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egyptology Here only generalizing, for not making it any Sphinx versus Pharaohs either, when also the Pyramids as well. All those details, for next only science, and next the minuscule world we could make it for only just points, except not any part versus whole, which could cover it all. Just think, for only consider, and it becomes only view for that of an opinion, if not any consideration you could make it either. Again the problem with my mouse and keyboard, for already mentioned, but here the renounce, for also renunciation, if not any abandon, and here Jesus hanging on the cross, for only God having left him, and next we also should know as well. Here the waiver or the like I could make it for perhaps earlier on, except not any absolution you could make it for only the church, when also forgiveness for just a Sin, for not any renunciation or denial you could make it instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poster Yes, dumb or silly me, for not any universal gravity we could make it instead, for also the Weak and Strong Force for also the Interaction you could make it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction So here I am perhaps still only thinking, and next making it a moniker or Allegory for next eyes could see, but next perhaps not believe. Any recognition you could make it, and perhaps only for speech for such, except not any Faith you could make it either, because if not any tampering you could make it, perhaps only just pricking instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty But only if I knew, or actually knew, of course, and for that, perhaps Evidence for such you could make it, except not any real Fact either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheep https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dolly_(sheep) Yes, count them, for not any Dolly you could make it, for still not any Word Link either, and here perhaps could only cut it short, for not any specific either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism Only exclude for that of an exclusion, and it becomes also that of discarding as well, for only throwing away, except not any exclusion for just Logic instead. When I try to look up that of "exclusive" for only that of word here, for not any Model you could make it, I end up a bit stuck, and you could next give it a try. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusion_principle Getting perhaps a bit wrong here, but trying to separate any Exclusion for also the Logic you could make it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusive_or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperative Only just that of Uncertainty you sometimes could make it, perhaps not any rejection you could make it, because you already know that just disgusting instead, and it becomes only those cards for such. condemnable - objectionable - reprehensible - deplorable - condemnation This because here I still have to translate, and next also correctly, except not any material being ejected from a star, for not any rejected either. Here water needed for that of the coffee after dinner, and of course it has to boil, before being poured in the cup. incantation - conjuring | bliss - mercy - happiness - joy Making it that of renunciation again, for not any bliss or mercy either, and perhaps also deed as well, for only just an act, because it should not be any conjure here. Only just the misdeed or iniquity you could make it, because here you are perhaps able to see or notice that it could be purpose for also meaning, when also the Universe we could make it, for just meaning. Close the door, for not any lock you could make it, and next also the other side of the door, for the thing you could make it only next, and for that, perhaps not any misfortune you could make it either. Only just the word "feeble" coming at me here, for not any weakness you could make it, still that of weak and strong you often could make it, except not any citation for only a phrase. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology Again just looking around, for perhaps only the Wikipedia making it this word, and here the second figure at the right, perhaps could deserve a little more of spacing, except for always wondering if we could prove only for just a word, or perhaps an Equation could be still needed. If I could make it just lawless for that of a society, also that of Anarchy versus Anarchism, as previously mentioned. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anachronism Only "Supper is ready" instead, and for that the dinner, except the last he made, for also being part of, before being executed. When I next key in "Jesuite" for not any Hebrew, or Hebrew language I could make it, next only stuck on that of word. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostle Any nature I perhaps could make it first, or still the bit of Religion it could be instead, for only just Idea and Speculation, and next only just left alone for such. Just sing a song instead, for not any grin you could make it, because still only nature for only a Cause, when it also could be explained. Any absolutes you still could make it, and only science for such, when just only Proof, except not the Scientific method, for perhaps only just explaining a little. Just a drawback, for any rewind you could make it, and next back at the beginning of time, for only its first moment, except not any conscious Mind coming along, or being included. Spelling it just wrong, for only conscientious instead, and perhaps only wrong, for only the Divinity we could be making of any Creation, for perhaps not any better. Here I wrote the word "sentiment" here earlier on, for only forgetting the other one, because it could be still Consequence, for that of large caps here, except not any saying for just a proverb either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument Here I do not like that of "premisses", for only such saying, except that perhaps Logic could be still for its Cause, when only just explaining. We do see nature for both purpose and meaning when just explaining, but what is the other alternative, if we could be looking for Cause or motive instead? Asking a couple of questions, and it only becomes blank for such, when only the cheque we also could be making for the same, and for that, just fruitless, or resultless for the same, except not any "infallibilities" instead, for just in order to describe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humpback_whale https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyphosis Which one is supposed to kneel here, except not any way of just concluding, for that of a statement also being made? Just think perhaps, and next also reason or reasoning as well for only just thinking, except not any Conclusion you could still make, for only just Fact. But next, only Idiocy instead, for not any Laws you could make it either, and here it should be a cup of coffee. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset Perhaps that of race condition not needed in the previous, but could perhaps be added, for not making it any Satire either. Any honest you sometimes could be, for also scrupulous as well, and I guess honesty could be part of it as well, for also honor versus conscience, except not any disgrace you could make it, for just a shame. grudge - resentment - rancor Here the little special word "rancor", for also the word being lost, and here only the specialty for it, when next making it only a thing to just describe. Just pop in your ear, for not any in versus out either, but rather just sins versus forgiveness, and you always could make it mercy of the whole thing. If it rather became what I only felt, if not any meant, for just senses either, still perhaps only a shame for such, except not any illusoric Fact you could make it either. So if still perhaps only an Adjective of sorts, next I could be making it only a provisional God, if not any Devil, for only my senses, and next also believe it as well. Any deeper meaning you could make it, for still only just senses, except not any Foundation you could make it, and perhaps it could be science as well. The God making for any Creation, when next also responsible as well, should not be any given for such, when only coming along, or being included, but should rather be "Our Father", for next the context you could perhaps make it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prose https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verse Maybe only just a tell-tale story we could be making for it, except not any written for just meaning, for also Lyrics, when still only Laws and Equations instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyrics Just the reign you could make it, for also sovereignty as well, and next only the Earth for such, except not any king versus queen either, because here only a curse at first. So help me God, for not any "-ish" you could make it, for also absolutes as well, because in one way or another, you could still make it a Concept for such, when only just a Method of science, for that of the same. For that, maybe not any "devilish" you could make it, for rather true believer instead, and for that, still only a Method for just believing, except not becoming any God versus "Satan" either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reign https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereignty Only white upon black instead, for only just "stark" contrast, for only just a reminder instead, because here at times, still that of purpose versus meaning. Just hit the brakes hard instead, and it becomes only a natural consequence for that of an act, except not any sledghehammer versus the head, when only just believe instead. So, if not any Belief, for just believing either, I guess the sea could be sometimes rough, for only the weather and wind you could make it, except still not any kick either. Only just a surprise at times, and we could end up being overwhelmed, except not any frightened or freightening you could make it, for only becoming paralyzed. Here the brutal world of just the reality you could make it, except not any "Wizard of Oz", for only a forgetful moment instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wizard_of_Oz_experiment Sorry for only making it the world of reality here, when only just that of madness or craziness just for a start, because here not any humor or wit, for that of wittiness either. Again the dinner right now, and two more tasks as well. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism I left out the above, if you perhaps noticed, because if any craziness or madness we could make it for just satire as well, only just a book for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Strangelove Just Thought versus Mind, and still only just behave, except only a beloved world for just the same, when perhaps not any strangers either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_number So here foil the plot we could make it, except not any Conspiracy for just the same, and we could be making it still only a world of pleasance and Dreams. Is this still the ordered Set we could make it, for just objects contained inside, being a part, because here removing a word yesterday, that could have been of use. Say you, say me for not any yes or no either, and next only a rose garden for such, when perhaps Garden of Eden instead, and next I am only ugly. Always the notion of God versus the Devil you could make it, for only a yes versus no at times, except not any whisper in the ear, because if perhaps only entities for such, we could be making it both Logic and numbers for that of a purpose, except still not any whisper either. I guess you do not catch me here, for only hard to describe, but if those things for only entities for such, if not any Constructs either, only that of such a whisper, when perhaps only just a thing you sometimes could be told. Any visible, for only just present, and it could be discernible as well, except not any state of Mind you perhaps could make it for only senses. Only just basic, for also foundation as well, and next Principle for perhaps the even better, except not any Premise you could make it, for only a conclusion. Just pour acid in a wound instead, and next sense for also feel, except still not any whisper in the air, for only making it Conditional logic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_condition Just only a race here instead, and it becomes only white upon blue, for not any negro versus black you could make it, but also that of Congruence or Parallelism as well. Hush, and next shut up as well, when next not any way to describe, for also that of order as well, except not any Mentality you could make it, for only order versus Chaos. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagram Only visualization techniques here, for that of describing, and still not any flow or flowchart you could make it, for only a lexicographic reference instead. Anyway, I will have to see if there are any dinners left in the fridge. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
Should we still make it an open science of sorts, or could we still be rather left to speculate instead? Just in vain, for also hopelessness at times, because if not any Falsification for also Doubt, when perhaps also a Lie as well, I could sometimes be making it single for only myself, except not any duo for just a pair, when also a trio, for sometimes a dance. Question any such thing as validity, for not any invalid it could be, and rather invalidity instead, for perhaps not any Insanity either, because if still false versus true, you also could count to three at times, starting with one. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychology Guess it could become wrong at times, for not any Falsification you could make it, because if only dubious or spurious for such, perhaps also senseless as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_(logic) Maybe that of the unary here, for the little minus ("-"), or maybe just stuck, for not any Quantum mechanics we could make it, for just no word versus meaning. The problem here is either leave it as is, or rather stick with Facts instead, for only the science it could be, except only meaningless instead. If a Method could be given or offered only to just describe, if not making it any genius versus idiot instead, perhaps making it Intelligence only for such, except not any valid you could make it for a Consequence either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequence Here only the first word popping up here, for perhaps others as well, if not any explanation you might give or offer either, because here only on thin ice. "We are the world", and next only Philosophy in order to describe, except not any Matter Creation versus Creation myth we could make it at times. Any Ideologies you could make it instead, for sometimes that of Fascism versus Nazism, when only at its worst, and next not any credible science we could make it, when only just proving for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism Here perhaps more that of two different way of Faith only for such, except not the church itself, because here still only waking up from a Dream, and not wanting to make it any Credo, for just God versus the Devil. Just purpose versus meaning instead, and we know how nature should be working, for also act, except not any intended Consequence just for meaning either. Still Logic only here perhaps, except not any Rationality you could make it instead, for only trusting your senses, when it could be only given senses for such. Here the word "rebuke" comes to me, for that of "an expression of sharp disapproval or criticism", except still only Proof for just science, when only just meaning. What if I rather left it "as is", for only just thinking, except not any meaning either, because still perhaps not any possible, except the senseless meaning you could make it. Just the opposite, for not any complete either, and it becomes only irrational, for not any rational you could make it, and still only a sentence. Only just rely on, and next only flip of a coin for not any trust you could make it instead, because it could also be that of dependence or dependency, because here perhaps still only the converse for also inverse you could make it, when next also the unary, for that of sign. Just said, and it also could be made, except not any made for any purpose either, when it could only be the inverse, because if only just word for that of meaning, also a sentence as well. Any five fingers you could be having on a hand, and next also two hands, for just ten fingers, except only ten fingers for just two hands instead. Of course she could be still wearing clothes and so on, except not any philosophical Argument you could make it for any Creation per se instead, and next believe in God, for only such a thing. One thing for only just the other, and still only counting for such a thing, except not any Method you could make it, and still I only could believe, for just a purpose. Just the spoken word, and it already became said, for also written as well, except not any explained, for just an explanation either, because if only just the Janus face here, for only a dubious or spurious meaning, perhaps not any Double standards for such either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard Just count to three instead, for only the trio you could make it, and still only numbers for such, when not any Logic for just proving either. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
Should I perhaps leave the previous as it is, for only just open, except making it "such" only twice in a row here? Next perhaps I should wish instead, only just to explain, except not any Harry versus Sally, for also the Scientific method, because here guessing, for also presuming, that it could be still the Method of Proof, for only carrying out science. You do not have to make a thing provable, for only just real Fact either, because if only a property of nature for a couple of things, next they could be defined. Just an answer, and next it becomes the Truth, except not any infallibilities we could make it either, and here still only just open for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity_(logic) Look back at the previously mentioned Congruence for only just Mathematics here, and next tell that this could be true, for only the given "Truth" we could make it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didactic_method Here perhaps not hitting it on the spot either, but could add it anyway, because if only just the Truth you could make it for science, also that both true and false could be implied, because sometimes just nonsense, gibberish, or bogey, for just a sentence you could make it, except for still stated Fact. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Querulant Looking around, and perhaps more or different sentences here, for also an explanation as well, because here perhaps not about any Intelligence as such, but rather behavior versus Mentality instead, for not any obsession either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculation_(disambiguation) Try key in any Idea, for just Speculation instead, and see what you get, except still the Scientific method here, for only a given purpose versus meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsession https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continental_philosophy Just reason instead, and next a way only to just determine, and next also conclude as well, for only a certain thing or issue, and still perhaps only Deductive reasoning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning Maybe just absurd, for not any dubious or spurious you could make it either, because here wondering if any insanity could still make you able to prove, or it should rather be only just provable, for that of the other. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity Just live in hope instead, and next not any false sense of luck you could make it either, because if both false and true could be just Truth for such, it should also mean that of Logic for just the same. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
Here should tell what happened to me since last time. I went to bed after sitting around for a while, and found myself on the street with a bag of sorts, where a couple of bottles and papers were stuck inside. Next both at the bus stop just above here, for also a bit more downtown as well. Feeling, or perhaps sensing that something was wrong, I tried biting my chin for also lips, but in no vain, for not any success at all. Finally waking up in my own bed, and it became just back to reality again, only for that of still sensing that I perhaps left another such one. Should therefore tell that this was quite a scary experience, for only ending up in the past this time, and not any future, but next almost for real. Just back again, and I want to have a look at the Rose Parade, for only its 131'st event, and it flips around a little for only recent problems, but am able to save the running environment. Thinking here that if in some way everything should be still Laws of physics, for also a bit of Quantum mechanics for such, any time travel could be still possible, but only in a way or by means of a non-physical environment for such, which is not any Hypnosis either. Sadly, but this is next only Religion for perhaps the Mythical thing it could be, or it could be some sort of time travel, for only just everything being relative. Just pure Imagination, and perhaps left with that, for only a stuck Dream, except anything like Reincarnation not materializing into any reality either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation Here not checking the details, except only just Dreams being inconclusive in nature for only its possible meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmigration So, cuckoo beware, for only attitude or Belief, for next also versus for such, because except for the Scientific method at times, not always any way to just believe either. First of all, if not any best either, always when Harry met Sally, except not any way of Belief for just science, when we could make it at least Quantum mechanics for that of a way of nature, and next a sense of Belief, for only just being insane. Just Credibility versus Logic, and it becomes an issue as usual, except not any way to just describe, when rather Myth, for that of the mystical. Here perhaps not any link for such when only spiritual powers for such, except only a definition you could be making of gods and angels, with respect to nature. I always made it that an Illlusion could always be explained for its actual sense or meaning, if not any issue either, but next also Credibility just to only prove. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagination When something becomes for real, it also becomes proven, for the actual issue it could be, for also Fact. Next write it off, for being no such thing either, and it could be still provable, except no such Fact either, because if not any Congruence here, perhaps not any mirror either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence Any "implied" meaning for just an Ambiguity or Contradiction, and perhaps no such thing being explained either, for still the provable Fact sometimes. Just distorted Facts at times, and next only sense versus meaning for only what you could make it, except still not any beware either, for just danger, if not any wolf. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
Just the pouring rain here, but ceasing off a little right now, for only ice on the road, and next a damp on the whole New Year celebration. With due respect as usual, not keeping up with everything there, but only for that of the sulphur acid becoming the worst, always that of fires burning all around, for only an ever present thing just happening. Here my sympathy to those being affected, for sorry to say both Pragmatism, Idealism, Ideosyncrasices, Ideologies, for not any Cynicism either, only related to that of a given world, and next also becoming part of science as well. Just give and take, and we know how all of it is, for next also becomes, when just taking part of a living world, for not any science you could make it. Only for that of telling a story, it next only becomes part of such, when it could be still the rain coming down, for also the firestorm raging as well. We know that it could be just laughter in the audience, for only the ridicule you could make it, but except for that, we could always be looking for the Truth. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menstruation Only just for "I wish", and next we could be forgetting the whole cycle here just for women, for only the pill instead, and still perhaps not any "Hooray for Hollywood", when only just shouting, when it could be still only a bar or discotheque. So here perhaps not any cat and mouse for just a game either, but only a natural process just out of nature, for only taking place, but still only celebrating. Again the fat belly for only just taking part, and here only just Christmas, for not any religious tribute you could make it, because here perhaps a better word. Next of course you should be allowed to do so, because it would be unfair just throwing off a couple of people, when still only a stomach for such. We know that Atheists are not paying any due respect for those traditions which could come along, for only being part of a Christmas we could still celebrate. Just Sin, for also deed, and it becomes still only an excuse or remorse for doing so, if not any absolution you could get for only just forgiveness, but except not any blank cheque, for only the carte blanche you could make it at times, always an excuse, for only carrying out an indecent act. So here any Moral obligations, for perhaps only one thing alone, and still the sense of right versus wrong, when also Justice, except for also that of misdeed, when only just a wicked or illegal act. Should tell, that from only the point of Martin Luther, and here the priest, for only making it the Protestant church, and at least a certain Belief only having for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestantism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther But next that I could be still born, and also baptized, and for that also the church, except not follow any suit or track for current whereabouts here either. Here currently the "confirmation" practise for only a ceremony for such, when still only a youth for such when that of adolescence, and here 14 years of age, because here it should not be any ritual for such either. So if not any "deem" you could make it, for only a false explanation, at least we could make it value for also worth, when making it also "regard or consider in a specified way". Here I was thinking that one way of making it a certain practise, could also be a way of just doing a couple of things, and for that, only just to a standard, except not any adapting to a given purpose, when it rather should be for real. diversion - change - variety - variation One way is still that of making it the Janus face, for only the Illusion we could make it, except not any standard for just nature, when we rather should conclude. Only adapting to given surroundings, and it becomes Darwin for such, except not any purpose you could make it when only just thought, because here still not any guessed or assumed either, when only for such a meaning. Just pretend instead, and it becomes that of pretension at best, when only just "here nature for only presence and meaning", except not any Consequence you could make it. If for some reason you could make it nature two different realities only for such, I guess you could be able to conclude for perhaps both, for only doing so. Just faking for a sense, and still only the simulation you could make it, because here that of bias for at least a word, except not any pretension either. Rather out of the car to just push at times, except not any "cloaking" you could make it for perhaps a hidden object, because here still the lack of grounds, for only the explanation you could make it, for also scientific Fact. Is just the lack of Proof you could make it, the same as ridicule, or could it be only just laughter, when perhaps only Falsification versus Doubt? So here perhaps only "Matter of fact" you could make it, when still not any presence for just a display either, when at least it should not be any show, and here just "comme ci comme ca" when only French for such, and perhaps not any better. Some people could still make it only gods and angels, for only the Belief they could be having, except not any Ambiguity or Contradiction you could make it, for only a scientific context or Principle. Adding to it also the Uncertainty Principle as well, and next I could be proving for a certain meaning, when still only a Principle, except not any Cause for only such. Next any pokerplayer you could make it, and for that not any house of cards either, except rather the Scientific method, which should be about telling the Truth, because here still that of assume for also think, a little down. Rather just nice you could make it, for also fine, and it becomes that of Creation here, when perhaps next the Big Bang versus Instantiation only for such. Still just proving for science as well, or of course, and for that a couple of signals and scores we could make it, except still not any definitive Fact. If I could be confusing possible Intelligence with that of any gods or angels, you are welcome, except for still only the meaning you could make of it. So good, and next not any worse for that of any better either, when still only nature for both purpose and meaning, except only just ants for one thing, and next the human civilization you could make it, for also the Earth itself. Here Calcium in your skeleton, for also Iodine for your thyroid, or thyroid gland, when also Carbon for your muscles and internal organs, except not any Iron for just a fuse you could make it. Any Proof, for only just Method of Proof, and next "I know, or knew it", or perhaps only Eureka for such, except not always or necessarily telling the Truth either. Only just separate, for that of a separation, and for that going each their respective way, except not any OR or NOT you could make it for only just Logic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_conquer Making it only just an elephant instead, and perhaps only set and forget for such, except still only remembering a little instead, only for doing so. But next, still only just good, for that of diversity and manifold next for only nature, when only billions of stars and galaxies for such, when only the certain meaning you could make it for just opinion, when still only proving for a given Cause. Any false you could make it, and next only basis for such, if not any foundation either, because at best, that of a false Premise here, when not any Claim either. My guess it becomes only "Yup" for only such, because next it only became told, for not any Conclusion you could make it either. We know that only the Religion you sometimes could make it, could be just an excuse for just praying a little, except not any assumed or certified you could make it, when still only a meaning for such. Just "better off", and always the science we could make it for just meaning, when still that of certifying, for only just the Proof you could make of it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology Just by means of a translate, I know that a broker could be "a person who buys and sells goods or assets for others", for only just the bargain you could make. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_liquidity Next only for good when doing such a thing, except not any worse it could become when only just loosing a little, making it still that of value for also worth, when not any expenses for such either. Could you next make it a tenet or doctrine instead, or could you still make it any material goods for just values, when still not any "worth" just for science? My guess is that science could at times be that of "absolutes" for only doing so, except not any philosophical Aspect just for meaning either. So here perhaps not any vice versa you also could make it for any Divide and Conquer, when still knowing that it could start with 0, and end with infinity, for not any negative numbers you could make it either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodology So here please attend church instead, for not ending up in any crossfire either, but next I perhaps could still believe in God, for only just sense and meaning for such. Only just a leftover at times, and perhaps only a drink for such, if not any spare time either, except rather the intentional you could make it, for only just intended meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_sentence After the rain, I guess it could be still winter, for only gusts of wind next coming in from the sea. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
If there is ups and downs for only just life, you should know about that, for also my typos and grammatical errors. Just a soft drink for that of beverage, and not any alchohol, helped a little for only chronological issues I could be suffering. Here much rain coming in as I said, and if not any breeze for only stormy weather, and it becomes something in between, for that of a gale. But taking the history of the Earth some 4.5 billion years back in time, for only its birth, and at least temperature being a factor, for only the Chaos following just everything. Here lava was flowing, for only volcanoes spewing out clouds of ash and smoke, and sometimes flaring a little as well, for only a fire of ball, while earthquakes shook the ground and made for the formation of the continents above the sea. Always those things happening, for not any moment of time just happening, because only then, time could cease to exist, for just a moment of happiness and joy. So here perhaps not any silence either, but rather still a moment of time for only a standstill, except not any endless you could make it for either or the other. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
Here getting tasks lost, for only not reported within given time, and perhaps not any "ghosts" this time either. Checking, and my remaining tasks are still before or preceding reporting deadline, so here either resetting the project for only aborting, except for rather continuing instead, and here this account. Also pressing the Update button from the Projects tab, with NNT set, and it does not help either. Sensing here that I perhaps should continue here, because resetting only makes things worse, but here taking your suggestions or advice. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
Just "Money for nothing", and next value for worth, when only just counting, because here philosophical thinking, should also be that of reasoning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason But next the fine word "tantamount" again, only for being able to count, when perhaps nothing more either. Could you make a word or sentence a replacment or substitute for any nature, when only Laws and Equations for such, and perhaps not any Ten Commandments either. Of course, always those patterns we could make it for nature, except still only structures, but at least an ability to distinguish here, for only making it a difference. Just a Thesis, and it becomes only preaching for such, except for the dictionary for only collecting everything together, when only a written context for such. So here still only in the middle of it, and for that making it verbal as well, except perhaps only spoken word for such, for also oral at times, and not any written. Just the little dot, for not any single character itself, and next a sentence, for also a paragraph, and still only the chapter of a book we could make it, for only expressed or written meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivation Really just the hard science we could make it here, when also the two first links below, and for that, also a nature we could readily assume or think, but if we could still be able to prove, for not any sentence either, could we rather make it Uncertainty for such, when still not able to conclude? Next tell me, which Laws are counting for that of any Chaos theory you could make it, and next what, or which ones could also be valid? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claim Does just valid, for also validness or validity, just speak for itself, or should you still rather conclude instead, for only making it a certain meaning? Are things still Fundamental only for such, when only the Fundamental science you could make it for the same, when still not any absolutes either? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_research Just fixed, for only set, and it becomes set meaning of it, except still only the way to conclude, for only a couple of things, if not any certain either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absurdity Just count on me, for not any set meaning either, and perhaps not any reason to believe, when only a meaning for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assertion Here the two links for that of the second one, catches me at first, namely Logical assertion, and Proof by assertion, because this is just the way to go, when still only Proof. Just flip it around a little, and here it becomes assertiveness for only the confidence, or self-confidence you could make it, except still not any conclude, for that of science. So for that, not any cocky, or "high in the hat" you could make it, for only a sense of meaning either, because only just rely on, and it still should be only Proof. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgment_(mathematical_logic) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion Here adding the links for only the mentioned, because if just sailing out on the sea, not any much of Evidence you could make it either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equivalence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_truth Feeling better instead, and perhaps only the Chaos theory you could make it, for only just a way of living. |
|
bluestar 发送消息 已加入:5 Sep 12 贴子:4216 积分:2,084,789 近期平均积分:3 |
If the previous went in, getting to the coffee here, for only the cooker, and the word "eloquent" comes up with me, and next the bit of surprise, when only translating this word. Any "realizing" you could make it, and next you might also think that I could be speaking on behalf of nature, if rather being the opposite way instead. Of course I could do the whole thing just pure science only, but for that, only "trust" my word, for perhaps not any senses either. Make it just spoken word for perhaps something said, and it becomes the Ten Commandments here, for not any Scientific method you could make it. If nature could still be only proven Facts using Laws and Equations for such, at least Fundamental Laws for the same, except not any expressed or written meaning for only a statement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdote Here you have at least something for a start, when I also know that a Thesis should not be any closer to a disputation or dissertation, because here maybe some dictionary of sorts in either paper or electronic format, for only storing the whole thing together. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis As I said, just tell me, and next perhaps I also was told, except not any made it for perhaps nature instead, when we should know about both Laws and functionality. I made it even a thief for just what he stole, except not drawing any similar conclusion that just wording for a sentence, could be proving any Universe either. And just for the sake of entertainment, we even could make it "Letters from an idiot" sometimes, except that these should not come from a clergyman either. Questioning nature for any answers it could offer, next also that of Truth as well, except not any certify you could make it for meaning, when only an answer instead. "Was it you, or was it me", and next only the idiocy of just thinking that the Universe could be having its flaws, for only the answers we are not able to deduce. But next take it for granted, if not perhaps so either, that there may be a Reason behind, for only an intended purpose, when we could make it a Creator for such. If you look at purpose and meaning for only just the Earth, you know that it could be also life, for just such a thing only. Applying only a formula for such with respect to nature, it still only becomes nature for both intention and meaning, except not any Cause you could make it, and looking down, for not any up either, it really was the quantification we could make for nature here. I guess it became a little wrong in the previous, for only making it provable science instead, but only for just making it that or so at times, we also could be able to determine as well. But next, only for making it just straight to the point for just everything, do we next make it any Consequence for just any nature, when it becomes only look and feel for such a thing, and not any taste either? Those Equations for that of Derivation, for only a subject, are really quite terse and difficult, and the same also for the vectors or tensors by Einstein. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar_field Any reason you could make it, and next also reasonable Facts as well, except not any basic Principle, when it also could be that of a Premise. Just word link instead, and it became that of "rudimentary" as well, for only a short version of it as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor This really is Mathematics at its best, if not any Physics either, but next perhaps not any "Little Green Men" we could make it either, for just "sorrow to say". Just two cubits you could make it for only God versus the Devil, for only opposite side, or vice versa, except not any two faces or facets for just nature, when you sometimes are not able to explain. Only "that's it", because we only know, and next also the provable science we could make it at times, except not any nature for only sole purpose either. Any give and take, and we perhaps know what that means as well, except not any sentence for just meaning, when it should be only conclusive Facts. Only being able to conclude at times, and it is also because you know, and therefore you also could certify as well, for only making it a Conclusion. Next any dubious or spurious you could make it, or instead, and it becomes inconclusive at best, if not any Lie, Doubt or Falsification instead. Just credibility for making a statement, and perhaps not any false you could make it, for still only its worth, when only just a story. Only making it the thin membrane separating any water from just air, and still the difference, except not any Set for only structure, telling that a thing could be just part of another. If you make it perhaps a+b+c for not any "=" here, only just Algebra for such, except not any Set versus subset telling where each should belong. But if you rather make it a with respect to b, for also b with respect to c, next also a with respect to c, except still not the little "-", for just a difference. But next, any smooth for also hard you could make it, and perhaps still a difference, except not any properties you could make for just nature, when rather just objects instead. Any curve you still could make it, should be still only a circle, so making it any square for just only transform, and perhaps not any sliding for such either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagorean_theorem Here only just the basic principle you could make it for only nuts and bolts for such, except not any philosophical thinking just behind. Still only one thing versus another here, except not "squeezing" anything into bits and pieces for only the endless possibilities you could make it, for only that of infinity, when also combinations for just the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combinatorics But next the long way from just the halo or envelope for the electrons orbiting single atoms, through both a circle and a square, for only what it represents or means, and it becomes quite a difference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfinite_number Here I was just thinking about 0.3333 for also just pi (3.14), except that such numbers should be only partial, for not any complete either. Still only take, for not any given either, and I was able to conclude, for perhaps not any reason either, that there should be a Reason behind, and therefore only a Creator for such. Again, we could still make it a discussion about UFO's here as well, except only the endless quarrel for only left to speculate at times. The Universe is so large, for only huge, that just racking down, or denigrating any witness, for just a story being told, perhaps makes no sense at all. Maybe we could just make it provability for the science it should belong to, or being part of, except rather prove science for just meaning, when rather nature instead. Therefore not any "disgusting" you could make it, when it still should be only aggrandizement or extol instead, except perhaps only a way of Belief you could make it, still could be only a Construct for a nature with perhaps no meaning. Just machine, for also a mechanism you could make it, and such a thing could be designed, for also constructed, when perhaps also made. Any Intelligent Design we could make it, and it should be so with respect for God, except not any handmade, or craftmanship you could make it either. We could perhaps think that everything became just "spawned" for only coming out of just nothing, except still the Instantiation we could make it, for only the Big Bang. I better make a new one, for that of the rest, because here only a start. |
©2020 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.