Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 353 · 354 · 355 · 356 · 357 · 358 · 359 . . . 366 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Could it be a limit for such and a Creator is only having a Sequence to deal with? If so he should be placed in the middle of the Sequence when others adjoined. Such a thing could be hard but also compared when level, but also an extract when other particulars are not being used. For that he knew which one were important for not less and compared with others for structure. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Perhaps more here when ... nonsense at PrimeGrid. Here two ... options gets at me first and one is the Equation... I could make and the other infinity. For this Euclidean space should be a subset regardless of ... or plural (Cardinality). So ... down to Earth ... or failing and I thought he should be (coming down to us) resembling a cross, but that both Arithmetic and ... randomness should be at the bottom of the .. diagram for ... Here it becomes leveled for that of Topology when ... at the top but also ... origo for an intersection and ... down into negative. But if so, it should be a single Creator for each ... and here I do not know (or explain) .. for a meaning ... but only a subset (where) it could be used. So if there could be different (or many) Creators, each could be in the middle of the subset (Sequence) defined and becomes plural for ... (Here) his working or ... for needing should be part of the ... already defined and ... and (part of) a prospect as a whole. For this he does not need everything when becoming nature but only himself to ... deal with and next it becomes a ... passing. Such a thing becomes a Creator ... passing and next another ... replacing ... equal but only substituting. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Make failure that of his and (both) Faith/Creation and Destiny for each end of the Sequence. Here the horizontal piece for a reason when the other could be leveled. To me he ends up in the middle but also could make more than one Sequence belonging to respective Creators. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Should a prospect be defined and next before any Creators attached to it. But for such it becomes time defined and that is strange when also other properties could be included. So if I knew time was existing also beforehand but still only defined. Such a thing becomes cooperation but still a prospect when it could be failing. Could nature have a disagreement of what could be coming first when still only time defined? Such a thing becomes a prospect defined but also should know about itself. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
My guess is that his legislature should be a limit for other nature becoming. But for that a Sequence construed in an attempt when also trying. Such a thing as will is only a part when he also could fail for another reason. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Here second for that of degree and he could be failing for an Oath, or perhaps unsuccessful. For that it becomes a difference comparing level when a Sequence which should be horizontal, or Abstract. But if so, other Sequences should be for other Creators having their respective level. Ending up with a prospect and it should be still a Topology not compared with another because of a failure implied. Such a thing should be complete and not continuing because it should meet a limit and not succeeding. Only that it becomes an indefatigable structure and I am not in favor of this meaning. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Should tell, but having flies in my room both small and ... and trying to be friendly ... with them. Not necessarily because they are ... but having Intelligence ... which not always ... shown on the surface. Just purport for a meaning and I also thought a Creator could be having such meaning but here different. Perhaps visible rather than shown but needs an edit here. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
And the WOW! signal was a strong narrowband signal according to Jerry R. Ehman but not a gaussian so what is the difference? Need looking up first name but connected a keyboard to the laptop which is too large and awkward to use. I can not continue with this one and concentrate on the five beers left instead. I think you need to prove a digital transmission while proving aliens is another thing. Even worse when left handed because next I cannot use anything. Maybe stranded could become an exception but here not able to continue. Failure of a prospect and it also becomes failure of meaning and next regardless. And here reminds me of "Oh sole mio" when only unit instead. Perhaps failing should be defined on 1 rather than 0 but deserves longer sentences or longer lines. I am having the evening downturn but the buffer rooms longer lines. Such a thing as shortening any lines does not make them longer. Or rather a Sequence could be infinity at two ends when still continuing and a Creator in the middle. But for that a prospect could be skewed or disaligned and tilt to the ground. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Such a thing as ground should be flat for not sucking up water or Arithmetic in the negative but here I forgot randomness. Here the Christmas star could be at the top and confused for only a horizontal Sequence having Faith or Creation (per se) at the left and Destiny at the right. But also origo for an intersection and next many Sequences instead making it plural. Or rather the bucket of water at the bottom when it could be sucking water for not resembling that above. Perhaps it becomes many Topologies instead but next should be adjacent with each other. I think divine could be having more worth than quantized. Randomness is only a part so next could also be used and I am out of here. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Just hide the post because if I meant to prove Intelligence in 3i/Atlas you would disagree with me. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Should I follow the mainstream and think 3i/Atlas is aliens, but here the other post went down the drain. Only for becoming too long and next wasted and that is my dishabit. I think it is wrong making a spaceship when only a cylindrical stone. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
What is the definition of a signal? If I could speak into a microphone or use a recorder, my voice would appear as an analog curve which needs to be converted. Not read the papers yet but also I am not active. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
What is the definition of a signal? If I could speak into a microphone or use a recorder, my voice would appear as an analog curve which needs to be converted. Forgot the Dyson sphere by the way but here just a guess. Edit: Criss-cross when only meant one post. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
You could move it here but also the problem of making it infinity and here cold fingers. To me such a thing could be unknown or undefined but also could be empty or nothingless. For that you quantize empty when still existing but also could be the opposite for full (or complete). And not "when" full so could be having another meaning when coming from ... toolset, but here (a missing word). But here such a toolset should not be the same as any aliens we could observe, or maybe witness instead. I think everything should be within a Frame for an Universe existing and next also part when multiverses inside an Euclidan space. Or maybe running in parallel so next same Sequence but here an intersection went across origo instead. Some things are important and other less and for that quantized on unit. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Here both Arithmetic and randomness should be placed at correct position but was uncertain about that. Only one intersection through origo and should also be for a single Sequence and not many, and resemble a cross for level. But also could be switched for position and here Uncertainty becoming visible when extending. Meant failure on a single meaning but also he could be quantized and here dispositioned but also him when failing. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Here PrimeGrid doing backup or scheduled maintenance so having the coffee in the meantime. Life could be common for also prevalent and next perhaps a difference between Probability and possibility when that of Sets. Getting back at it later for sitting in a cold room and only coffee and soup first. That should be chicken soup and perhaps I did not buy all I need when shopping. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
And here a sense I have been pushed back to a day experienced before. So strange when I thought each day should be a new experience for also learning. Here the room is cold for sitting and president Trump is giving a speech and here not listening when only watching instead. Or perhaps it should be a translator for not any commenting but needs an edit here before finished. Such a thing happens when becoming old but also it could be someone living inside. I am always slipping on the last sentence so here deviating for a sharp curve instead. Such a thing should be a bend and next approximate for closing in. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
I better should join old mans club when 3i/Atlas is only a blob. One thing noticed here is when helding the stick on the back of the phone against light it appears green for not any white. And that becomes white versus black when the latter could be a surmise. Just nobody's fool and it becomes many and you still only could guess. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
Wish for a forsaking and also I could regret it when the Bible. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7723 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_coordinate_system Now it came to me and could make it tumbleweed for not any aliens when proving for ... Or pros versus cons but here cold fingers for sitting in a cold room. The secret here is meaning of word and here I do not have it. Having the beer and another post lying in the buffer but unable to see contents before posted. This because we should not confuse numbers with any aliens we could prove. Perhaps a Creator could reside in origo when a Cartesian system could be moving through virtual space. |
©2026 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.