Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 348 · 349 · 350 · 351 · 352 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148636 - Posted: 2 May 2025, 19:16:19 UTC
Last modified: 2 May 2025, 19:20:57 UTC

And Seti@home is still a place for believers so why am I here?

I guess it should be proving for a purpose when validness for the same, or perhaps meaning instead.

So here colors are still important when it could be yellow and blue for a butterfly.

Perhaps it was a yellow giant and blue star in pair and next I confused with an orb.

Or maybe an orbit instead so next it could circle around each other for gravity being a purpose.

But also I have a problem with when versus where when still only in pair for writing and here not any proving.

Or maybe a switcharound for making it for instead but also removing the link and I forgot the comma.

Perhaps intent becomes implicit and next it should be only part for a purpose for also casual for meaning and it does not work.

But also replicating versus copy and I still thought it was existing in pair but next conjoined for also eggs.

And here translating for the little "n" so forget it because it does not work.
ID: 2148636 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148638 - Posted: 2 May 2025, 19:28:35 UTC
Last modified: 2 May 2025, 19:32:17 UTC

And that becomes the same story all the time when I asked for a template and you chose to dismiss the subject.

Or maybe follow the leader instead and my memory fell short because of age or ageing and spells wrong.

But also repeating myself when and twice and nothing I could do about that, sorry.

Apologies, that should be only a word when and for meaning but perhaps you did not comprehend or maybe large caps instead.

The only I know is that Omega Centauri could have a million stars and they could come from there.

Or rather a visit so next it becomes extraterrestrial beings visiting us in a spaceship.

Edit: Perhaps big rather than large for rhyming better and here writing on the spot.
ID: 2148638 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148859 - Posted: 10 May 2025, 18:48:55 UTC - in response to Message 2148709.  

If you are a fan of Science Fiction and Star Trek you also are supposed to prove science.

Edit: I feel a disturbance in the Force but not able to participate anymore.
ID: 2148859 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148860 - Posted: 10 May 2025, 19:25:44 UTC
Last modified: 10 May 2025, 19:51:52 UTC

I think diversity could be the winner for seeing mottled clouds outside.

But also the problem of not able to write in a single sentence for becoming old.

Just diversity makes nature rich and also variable and for that many different things could happen because of an Event.

Next you could prove for a single purpose when it could be tantamount or equivocal but also feeling a disturbance in the Force.

Such a thing becomes shaking with your hands or throttling and next becomes only Chaos for a part when not any implicit for resembling.

Just failure is wrong for not any correct but also we think it is perfect for another meaning when still not precise.

For that it becomes switched hands when moving with the left for not any right but also best purpose when both and next ...

But here some people are still left handed and could use arms for that of skill when still meant for.

I think that when still a part it could be proven for both and next becomes existing for nature in the fashion it could be.

So included for such part was Uncertainty but next decided for a meaning when implicit and that becomes infinite.

Make it resolute and it should be still existing but next for only a Force readily at hand.

Such a thing became another toolset but next should be inherited for coming into nature when spawned.

So here part of such a thing should be still a toolset and valid for the purpose meant for but also could be switched.

For such a thing it becomes opposite but next for only inverse for also negative, and not any other part which could replace.

Or maybe substituted so next replacing parameters when a toolset, because here they were equal for only compared.

But also it could be aligned and next only upwards for that of level until it could meet another for existing which is given name.

So here context vanished when still for meaning and it became another purpose which could be explaining.

Just red star and next hocus-pocus and not into that right now, but needing an edit.
ID: 2148860 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148862 - Posted: 10 May 2025, 20:10:18 UTC

Should try to tell and not any funny, but could let others finish the other stuff.

Here I am living in a Mental ward (or perhaps hospital) because it is the emergency department and divided into four sections nicknamed "corridors",

In my native language it becomes "tun" and someone need to translate for me.

And this because my flat in house association got defect, but they are using Mental as an excuse for my living, so unable to return back.

For this a discussion or correspondence back and forth by means of email, and here through separate lawyer and also guardian.

Wanting to have this mentioned so trying my best in order to get it correct but here only twice for not any becomes instead.

Just fun and needs an edit before finished and sorry about that.
ID: 2148862 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148863 - Posted: 10 May 2025, 20:14:19 UTC

tampering
ID: 2148863 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148864 - Posted: 10 May 2025, 20:16:26 UTC - in response to Message 2148861.  

Just captain and only a coincidence, but hide it.
ID: 2148864 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148917 - Posted: 13 May 2025, 8:11:52 UTC
Last modified: 13 May 2025, 8:18:51 UTC

I meant tampering of evidence but also many words in Word link so forget it.

But also suffering from Arthritis and a stay at Mental so not able to contribute.

And for that you may choose to be a Skeptic or debunker for also dismissing when forthcoming is hard even when the Scientific method.

But again my head went lost in the morning so unable to write what I wish for that of gut will or Mind.

I was thinking about the word "will" and it reminds me of force when also power, for not any thinking.

Such a thing as aliens could be only an assumption (or just guess), but also it could be evidence suggesting they exist.

I have seen some pictures standing out in clear and also video or frames on a yellow background which may be impossible to edit or tamper with.

And that is by means of software but here I wrote myself off and could be shortened.

Their way of moving is only by means of a spaceship (or craft), otherwise they could be sitting besides my bed.

And for that it should not be any female emerging in my room either for being in yellow color and tint.

I think nature could be pretending and next many reasons for its auspices.
ID: 2148917 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148918 - Posted: 13 May 2025, 8:22:59 UTC

And that is logical when only in the name of for pretending because nature should always have a reason for its origin.

But for that it became a toolset preceding which should be divine for meaning only because it is something else.

So next you only could add what is existing and next it should be present and always there.
ID: 2148918 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2148929 - Posted: 13 May 2025, 19:55:28 UTC
Last modified: 13 May 2025, 20:05:43 UTC

If I may, but science should be about a motto and next I tried explaining everything by means of a Creator, and not any believed.

This because proving should be only a part and next we do not know which.

So here I am and also you are and that should suffice.

Just empty versus believed and nothing should be existing, or perhaps it does.

So here the sun could be shining in yellow for that of color and Betelgeuse in red, but next both could be pretending for not any other showing.

Or maybe it became a toolset instead and next it could be leveled.
ID: 2148929 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149007 - Posted: 15 May 2025, 22:36:32 UTC
Last modified: 15 May 2025, 22:40:51 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4-L2nfGcuE

Watch the bird at the left for its eyes, and here it laid down.

And for that it became evil visible but could be coming from another place for only inserted.

So thinking it could be evil also it could be crooked but also having similar property for possessing.

But also that such a thing could exist for the UFO's we only could be guessing about but also for real and next having nature as property.

Such a thing could be on behalf but also an entity so next we only make it wrong for seeing and also observing when a ghost.

Just relative for everything and it also becomes seeing and observing but next for only versus and that is Fundamental forces.

That becomes only a part but next also interpreted for such a thing so next I could be wrong.

But for that I could also become stuck for a pencil and not any adhesive tape when it should be hung on the wall.
ID: 2149007 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149282 - Posted: 24 May 2025, 21:45:45 UTC
Last modified: 24 May 2025, 21:47:29 UTC

At PrimeGrid I posted about infinity but next it became failing method instead.

Just failing should be Chaos but also implicit when it could have been created first hand.

For that only first part of the Sequence when it could be more important but weigh less for meaning.

But for that both quantized and Uncertainty fails for meaning when also infinity, so next an uncertain Creator instead.

Make it failing and it also becomes a property when given name for only definition, but also a structure.

So here not any UFO we should believe or prove the same, of course.

For that leveled should be a structure but next a hierarchy when it could be above.
ID: 2149282 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149283 - Posted: 24 May 2025, 21:52:39 UTC
Last modified: 24 May 2025, 22:11:25 UTC

I made it ... [ ... ] ... for only continuous when it could be many Euclidean spaces inserted, next on a row.

Or rather inside for an Interval when a Sequence instead and the external dots becomes a Creator for beginning versus end.

But for that it could still go in loop when a Creator uncertain for meaning, and a row became only a chain following.

So next for only how many and it should be many Euclidean spaces instead, but that becomes spurious.

Or rather I confused recursive for only a Sequence and not any Interval instead.

Really I am having a problem with sequential versus Chaos and next only level instead.

I could still stand at the top but also topple but next it was faltering instead.

And that should be a hierarchy or tree above for level when still failing.

I guess it could be failing for both recursive and Sequence when still level, but also the top.

Order could be still chain so next nature does not know about itself when Topology.
ID: 2149283 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149284 - Posted: 24 May 2025, 22:16:31 UTC
Last modified: 24 May 2025, 22:37:56 UTC

So here forgot a face for smiling when also an alien behind the levers but also gravity a purpose.

For that it could be failing at the top when leveled, but still a Creator decided when single.

I should have made it a hierarchy or tree when still only Topology.

Never mind, but I asked if he could be having siblings when still single and it becomes continuous only for reach.

Just an entry becomes a door for only trap instead and next it became only believed.

Such a thing as believed is only a part for not any entry when it could be level instead.

I forgot attained when still only reached so next it should be quantized instead.

Just failing difference and he only quantizes for himself when still single.

Perhaps I still could watch a frame but also could be blurred and an error could be broadened in comparison.

Make it at top level when still wide and not any true but forgot the stack.

My postulate, but he creates for simple when becoming complex for nature.
ID: 2149284 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149285 - Posted: 24 May 2025, 22:42:52 UTC
Last modified: 24 May 2025, 22:55:27 UTC

The old story is that you did not prove any levers when it could be an alien sitting behind.

I had a short break so perhaps another word than proving, so maybe handle instead.

Not any rear butt so perhaps gravity for moving and I mistook wrong word.

Just failing could be Mind so next I could have gray hair, but also that Logic could be different.

Anyway, screwball but still only blurred.
ID: 2149285 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149422 - Posted: 29 May 2025, 22:32:39 UTC
Last modified: 29 May 2025, 22:33:53 UTC

I am not you anymore, but could be sharp on the factors I run.

For that you chose to throw out my arse even though I was eager.

There are those who think they have seen a UFO and also could claim but both could be in error when only a project to blame.

To me it becomes a witness too much but also a heaven too large so next it should always be present.

Or maybe forgot with but also two other words to be added, but sad thing is that Mind is not always with me.
ID: 2149422 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149443 - Posted: 30 May 2025, 16:29:45 UTC

Here in for a shock.

I received an email from Amnesty International Norway (in my thrash) and went to the main page from Privacy first.

Doing so I am shocked to see the picture which blames the U.S. or United states unilaterally and not the other part.

For one thing Donald Trump is an evil in the White House and the Israelis do not fare any better when bombarding the Palestinians,
but also they want their own state by means of terrorrism and not negotiations.

Here nature could be having different levels but also we could end up at one for only seeing and that should not be the Jews for only parting
when also selecting.

But also I do not see my own face or frame and therefore do not know what I post either so needs checking.
ID: 2149443 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149647 - Posted: 7 Jun 2025, 20:21:54 UTC
Last modified: 7 Jun 2025, 20:45:04 UTC

Not with you anymore, but if an environment could be gentle or mild also it could hostile for still an alien bad or ugly.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delphinus

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_Delphini

Edit: I went away from this post and perhaps should continue so hold on a moment.

Yet another restart because of heat and also I refreshed the tabs before logging on and should not do that anymore.

Edit: Just a coincidence for not two separate words instead.

But also asking for a method to prevent downloads because here I am bombarded.

I am not into it because saturated could mean overflow and next tools instead.

And for that it becomes rinsed water for not any clean or purified and did not have that.

Or perhaps sanitized instead and could lie on the shelf, but if not any purified not any clean either.

But also I could become overwhelmed and squeezed for that of structure but not packed.

Reminds me of an ego when only own for had but also meaning.
ID: 2149647 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149758 - Posted: 11 Jun 2025, 22:02:54 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jun 2025, 22:09:47 UTC

Just remember from childhood, I was with my parents on a fishing trip along the "fjord" in summer and my father caught two fish that was not eatable.

But in the night no Pleiades visible for only a blue sky, but here a stationary object not moving and looking like a star or perhaps a triangle, with colors.

And this because of looking at the object with binoculars for having an interest in Astronomy and knowing what I could see.

This was before Skylab and here three crew for not any shuttle but at least was launched and here from the ground.

For this I thought it could be a visitor coming from space, but for that it has to be an interstellar traveler.

The problem here is I need to write a little too much for being sure, or perhaps exaggerated instead because it was edible.

I think "instead" could be a prerequisite for just say and not any condition, but here cold fingers.

Edit: Just stump fingers and it is always cut short at the end.
ID: 2149758 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7437
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2149761 - Posted: 11 Jun 2025, 22:26:01 UTC

Or maybe Domino effect when writing about science but could fall short after posted.

Such a thing is the sciences we should know about but here for a difference, except for a nature just given.

And not daring for a single line and for that I could prove both Topology and travelers for respective and leave Religion still alone.

Hold on just a moment so perhaps it was insects instead.
ID: 2149761 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 348 · 349 · 350 · 351 · 352 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.