Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 344 · 345 · 346 · 347 · 348 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145916 - Posted: 2 Feb 2025, 8:27:39 UTC
Last modified: 2 Feb 2025, 8:47:09 UTC

Is any outcome indeterminate for result or is it final instead?

Make Uncertainty a part and it should be still included, but next for another part preceding it when only a Sequence.

Just inserting and it could be anywhere for not knowing what for position or placement, but that should also be him for existing.

This because also he is a part when only quantized and divine becomes the same meaning for only nature existing when also compared.

Just where becomes located and next only compared for a difference instead.
ID: 2145916 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145917 - Posted: 2 Feb 2025, 8:41:08 UTC
Last modified: 2 Feb 2025, 8:46:42 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ant

Not any Socialism here when it could sting but also a fly for mild or soft and here toilet in the meantime and losing the point.

Compare a difference when also meaning, but still not what I wanted to say so waiting a little.

So make it Logic for only a part and still quantized for a difference, but here perhaps logical instead.
ID: 2145917 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145918 - Posted: 2 Feb 2025, 8:49:10 UTC
Last modified: 2 Feb 2025, 9:13:31 UTC

Just same reason for any divine and it becomes equal for meaning when also failing for a point.

Or rather it could be leveled instead and next failing for only described when also a method included.

Could equal be the winner and next more for result when it rather should be unequal.

Just Arithmetic is a property so next making it "<>" for symbol instead.

But for that it becomes failure on NOT, or logical, but still not what I wanted to say.

Following a Sequence and it could be order, but next he was uncertain because here not any differentiating when order for Sequence,
so next part for only believed instead.

Anyway, screwed up so not trying to rewrite the sentence right now, but "of" is belonging.
ID: 2145918 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145919 - Posted: 2 Feb 2025, 9:16:30 UTC
Last modified: 2 Feb 2025, 9:23:07 UTC

Just tilt the little bone and I made it a new Equation, but next guess how for only using my Mind.

Could Supernatural be more when only level and it could still only be guessed, but here someone is writing for me.

Or rather on behalf of me so next someone should be existing, but continuing.

Just error is a part and next also guessed for the same meaning.

Just include for more and we should know it could be existing, but still only for a part.
ID: 2145919 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145920 - Posted: 2 Feb 2025, 10:32:43 UTC
Last modified: 2 Feb 2025, 10:46:28 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4-L2nfGcuE

You know, but if I want to rub her also a kiss and still only a sweetheart at home.

Posting here when not allowed to post in the page for this.

I think quantized should be only a part and next a method for the same meaning.

Edit: more when leveled perhaps, but here becoming late and also failing guess.

I think Logic could be a weak part for not any failing here instead.
ID: 2145920 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145933 - Posted: 2 Feb 2025, 20:09:41 UTC
Last modified: 2 Feb 2025, 20:56:20 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Method

Should tell that here I watched Ross Coulthart in a clip that was inserted and not from the beginning.

He is a radio host or personality and not TV-star and here a blunder he made he rather should regret.

But here my keyboard is flat and not working but hopefully you understand what I mean for not any finishing.

Perhaps a guess could be still an assumption when you are hoping, and here better prove Betty and Barney Hill for not any tic-tac instead.

Getting milk in the kitchen so being interrupted when having good Ideas for posting both here and the other project.

Here a method is supposed to be for a purpose but also limitless possibilities of nature (another word) but having that later.
ID: 2145933 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146125 - Posted: 6 Feb 2025, 23:36:18 UTC
Last modified: 6 Feb 2025, 23:48:33 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

Forgot, but a Principle could be still only Logic, but an important thing here still, and should be at the end.

Just dead links for reading but here burnt could also be smoldering so only posting by necessity when still having the beer.

Only sad versus a smile and it also could be compared, but next with something else.

Here some video I watched but do not remember the name, but only many streaks across the sky, but also slipping "but" versus "and".

Just equal for a single thing and next it also should be compared for the same and perhaps nature has been created on a single premise and not any imitation here instead.

Or meant copy versus replication but trying that above first.
ID: 2146125 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146127 - Posted: 6 Feb 2025, 23:54:20 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 0:05:11 UTC

I think it should be better having the link at the top when nature could be explained backward and forth, for not any opposite instead.

But also progress, so next it becomes still forward for not any backwards instead, and I forgot "complete".

Or rather it becomes down for not any up, so next transient instead (for a method) and not wrong way.

Just which way for only asking but also it could be a Principle, but even worse and I could be standing on my head and that should be upside down.

But also reminds me of a slash when divided, for not any cross-section or fraction instead.
ID: 2146127 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146128 - Posted: 7 Feb 2025, 0:10:29 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 0:23:02 UTC

Beware the wolf (or ding-dong) but some could make it a Type III civilization for not any five, so next I am not part of that discussion.

Here proving should be still important and not any failing for only necessity instead, because such a thing could also be need.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_ship

Forgot something in between, but what is a mothership for not any sailing and only question mark here first.

Just depending on size and it could be quantized, for not any feeble or small here instead.

Only that nature could be small for not any compared with a mothership, so read my posts at PrimeGrid instead.
ID: 2146128 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146129 - Posted: 7 Feb 2025, 1:03:02 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 1:24:50 UTC

You know, but how things changed when two flies ended up on my knee for still not any thigh (sideways).

Just ph... should be my body for only sideways but not having the word, but at least sitting.

Maybe three instead, so still not any "Phantom of the Opera".

Or rather in front for only standing so next I could be wrong.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phalanx

So here I could be still wrong but toilet in the meantime.

Anyway, you could still ask me but not any presuppositioned for nature either.

The sad thing is that this should be longer lines separated by a comma, but not having it.

Reminds me of a melody instead, but not having that either (Raiders of the ... but not Saga).
ID: 2146129 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146132 - Posted: 7 Feb 2025, 1:27:25 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 1:39:25 UTC

Every part is believed so next belongs instead when coming from anywhere.

But next include for a Set and not any believed for an Opera, so next I made it UFO's instead.

I think Set should be included for only UFO's another part instead, and it becomes Supernatural for the whole theme.

Forget the description when only explaining it, so next I could be still wrong.

And that becomes heels for not any thigh so next only in error instead (purposeful, but getting old).

Remember that the cliff could be standing high for not any oval for shape either.
ID: 2146132 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146133 - Posted: 7 Feb 2025, 1:44:40 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 1:57:39 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etymology

So next wishing I could know but having the beer and unable to continue, but next pick-a-boo for Episte... and next only believed.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistolography

Getting this and not exactly as I want because here it has been translated for wrong subject.
ID: 2146133 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146134 - Posted: 7 Feb 2025, 3:30:44 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 4:04:35 UTC

Oh so sad when only watching but next also kick in for best option when needed, but here SM(c)U for not any natural disaster instead.

This could happen many times for not being warned and next we are not prepared, but only repeating myself when an Event, sorry.

Here they could bury the dead when still only rich man driving and next it becomes only continuing instead.

Just burnt could be smoldering but next only wet for scavengers.

Or maybe missing comma so next precisely instead (repeating myself) but please have me excused when not getting out of it, or a loop.

Just having should be become so next only existing for each part instead.
ID: 2146134 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146136 - Posted: 7 Feb 2025, 6:18:43 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 6:29:51 UTC

Just bent crook for a pedestal and next wondering which crook I should use.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence

Forget the discussion we could be having for next only on PrimeGrid instead.

Only I could be round for not any squared and next a difference with nature instead.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fphBKMuznMk

Just part for only Afterlife or Eternity and next his realm could be empty.

Or for not any existing Laws, but that should be logical here instead.
ID: 2146136 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146137 - Posted: 7 Feb 2025, 6:35:45 UTC
Last modified: 7 Feb 2025, 6:59:34 UTC

So if you thought it was tic-tac for only a model so next forget it.

Here all options are open when it comes to me and here both viewpoint and approach (forgot word).

Or perhaps angle but still not the word thought of, so sorry.

Here one part of the Sequence could be at the left for not any differentiated with nature.

Or moving for completed down and next starting fresh for anew.

So if I could be having and next new piece for only a start instead (meant restart) and next it becomes grow.

Here failing versus grow should be a difference when only restarting.

... dunk or blank head, so wait a little moment (not Pauli exclusion Principle but).

Having it later when getting at it, but Steady-state model.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady-state_model

Apologies for not having it but "now" (short sentences).

You know I am not a fan of this model so dunk here still, and sorry for being late.
ID: 2146137 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146307 - Posted: 11 Feb 2025, 22:48:36 UTC
Last modified: 11 Feb 2025, 22:58:31 UTC

Shocking, and if for not any ice it could be an atmosphere instead where it could be tainted.

But for that having a problem making it objects for only parts and not elements instead, so next they could belong for each other.

And that for the big context it should be meant or relate for, but here the first coffee after dinner.

Maybe to instead so next could "be" disappearing, or rather "it" so needs editing.

Only for becoming equal for not any difference needs comparing, but also choose for such difference.

Anyway, same thing for only looking but also could be different, but also the opposite.

My failure is I could prove a rhombus for existing but still not any aliens.
ID: 2146307 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146308 - Posted: 11 Feb 2025, 23:08:38 UTC
Last modified: 11 Feb 2025, 23:21:16 UTC

Please do not tell me, but if I could be a pioneer (or forerunner) the Andromeda galaxy should exist before I was born, but need thinking.

The fact is that I could be born for only purpose meant, therefore there should exist others.

But that becomes plural for not any "it" so why am I thinking?

More coffee first before continuing, but a property should be similar for everything.

I think fantastic could be for the purpose of gravity (or was it mothership or space travel) so more thinking first.
ID: 2146308 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146949 - Posted: 28 Feb 2025, 19:57:05 UTC

Hi!

I got a page or Wikipedia which is slow to load, and therefore the search token in the address bar when rewinding and not the link.

Needs a fix when copying but here broken keyboard so using the mouse.
ID: 2146949 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146950 - Posted: 28 Feb 2025, 20:05:40 UTC

Not writing because keyboard not working but have seen objects that are good enough for me, therefore I think they exist.

But for that also gravity for a purpose and also levers and would like to know if it exists any more we still could explain.

That becomes knowledge for also Certainty but next it has been given us and here by some other.
ID: 2146950 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7351
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2146953 - Posted: 28 Feb 2025, 21:05:39 UTC
Last modified: 28 Feb 2025, 21:07:30 UTC

Ending up in the second factor file I made, it became a blank page without pressing return, and here line 515.

Meaning I pressed return twice for getting spacing but happens each time I switch tab and return from another application.

Needs a fix also here or perhaps same thread, but not part of Ufomind and therefore not in the woods looking.

Therefore have to scroll up one page and mark bottom with the cursor.
ID: 2146953 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 344 · 345 · 346 · 347 · 348 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.