Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 342 · 343 · 344 · 345 · 346 · 347 · 348 . . . 350 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144741 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 1:14:35 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 1:23:45 UTC

So where did the "U" came from when it could be heavy in the middle and I do not know, but could shorten posts because of the beer.

Or rather that Matter (or elements) could be concentrated in the middle, so next it could be empty on each end.

For this it could be a Contradiction when that of the opposite, but mentioned some of this at PrimeGrid.

Just floating and it could be having no endpoints but only hanging in loose air.

Edit: I lost a couple of keys on the keyboard, therefore a blank before the end parenthesis.
ID: 2144741 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144744 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 1:25:32 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 1:37:42 UTC

But also that a ghost or replica could be behind reason and here we do not know which.

Making divine a substitute for quantified and it becomes Supernatural instead.

And for that his realm could be a temporary place when a Topology instead, and this because a dream could be spawned.

So next a Topology becomes Euclidean space and part of a prospect for a hierarchical structure, but for that a naming scheme when prospect versus hierarchical.

Or rather a recursive Topology still, so next it could become attached (physical) for only a part when still hanging.

But here such a thing becomes a tree structure and recursive downwards.
ID: 2144744 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144745 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 1:43:32 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 1:55:06 UTC

Or rather physical versus divine so next we do not know who a Creator is.

For that it becomes a substitute and I should have edited the previous sentence (long) a little better.

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/biggest-questions-about-universe-beginning/

More I think that nature could follow different tracks when evolving and that one or more could be hidden.

Or rather it could become parallel or side by side when still not any symbolic, but here Divinity could be added along one of these tracks.

But for that it also could be a throwball for not any cyclical loop and here writing different contents than those already posted at PrimeGrid.

Just a loopback (already mentioned) ... but here his realm could be a representative of himself.

Just a resting fundament, and all three could be hanging in loose air, but meant weighted in the previous.
ID: 2144745 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144747 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 1:56:25 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 2:06:39 UTC

But for that I could be standing on a free-floating platform and next a bridge to another platform, still floating.

For that it becomes Euclidean space and his realm connected by means of a bridge.

Our failure could be making it a Type III civilization for still not any V, and next I have to prove it.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

Or rather it could become a Synonym, so next his realm could be excluded, only replaced by Divinity for its Laws (or toolset).

I better should have the link at the top so apologies, but having the beer.
ID: 2144747 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144749 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 2:11:44 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 2:16:47 UTC

Here I could disagree with some and also a moderator, but saw a grizzly face in a street, so next believing it.

To me it could be still dark for not any white (or the opposite) when looking into the face but should not be any representative.

Rather that such a thing should be pretend to or impersonate so next it also could be on behalf.

Or perhaps ugly instead so next nature could be having many facets.

I could be a skeptic (or skeptical) but also lean on a couple of things I witnessed or saw.
ID: 2144749 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144751 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 2:22:36 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 2:35:04 UTC

I could be a part or property of nature but also it (or nature) could fail.

For that I think Proof could be failing when we could prove extraterrestrials.

But also the question of whether such failing also could be a winner when "Pulcherrima" or perfect should be the opposite.

So here also side by side or parallel when also equal but here beer settling in and not having it, but also juxtaposed.

Let infinity be a property of everything and next also a Contradiction included.

Or rather that such a thing means Uncertainty so next it becomes infinity on equal terms.

For that I was thinking of a diagonal when it could be criss-cross instead, but also a straight line when it could be having many facets for being curved.
ID: 2144751 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144752 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 2:38:23 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 2:46:59 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere

Should tell, but I walked or wandered across sky-map.org and could see hints of that, but never know.

I think I could see it but not be any enterprise for another thing or regardless, but my favorite is a Type II civilization.

In short, but they could handle or manage gravity for their own purpose, but not a whole galaxy.

I think gravity is a product of nature and next it becomes a Creator behind.
ID: 2144752 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144754 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 2:48:46 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 3:01:49 UTC

So here perhaps a whip or whiplash when you could dismiss something which is wrong for not any proving instead.

Failure on wrong also becomes failing on true and next you could prove nature here instead.

Ready, set and go and nature could be always the winner but here losing track.

Just think that infinity has become included or embedded for a part, also it should be Uncertainty but here on equal terms.

Reminds me of proportionate versus improportionate so next it should not be on any equal terms.

Just fashion could be clothes and next David Bowie singing a song.
ID: 2144754 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144755 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 3:04:11 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 3:13:17 UTC

Just emptiness could be a property and next also black for color, but also that everything is for a part and next I have to prove each one.

So next if you think I proved aliens also you could discard it and next it could fail.

Or perhaps an essential difference/difference of being or perhaps and attribute, but perhaps we should not discuss that right now.

But for that it could be throwing in the sand and next it could fail.
ID: 2144755 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144757 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 3:16:19 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 3:26:48 UTC

So where is leveled and it could be a property of each one, undefined.

But for that it could become a disguise where a Creator is behind, or attributable.

Just thinking a Type III civilization is better also more but quantifed on given worth.

Slip my mouth when not having it but perhaps Type II, but here "It" is a Pronoun.

My failure is that I could start writing something else and next lose the original track.
ID: 2144757 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145005 - Posted: 8 Jan 2025, 21:34:47 UTC
Last modified: 8 Jan 2025, 21:39:44 UTC

And here watching video from Southern California, or Los Angeles where there is some sad news.

Or live news coming from Fox News so I still have to edit this.

Here by means of streaming media or broadband through my TV-decoder (indirectly) connected by means of cable.

Or just a cold start again before the second cup of coffee, but here a beautiful or nice home burning to the ground and firefighters only standing there for
not having any water in reserve or spare part in case it should ignite or flare up again (or perhaps spread).

Anyway, but firefighters need hoses and have to pull that out first and that takes some time.

More that when still a natural process also insurance should be mandatory, but that not all people does not afford or even bother.

So here it is true when a thing could relate on another but also with catastrophical result if it could tilt from the start.

So in its way for only an Interval and you (have to know where it is placed) (or location) and that becomes inside.

So when you only know it is worse for not any slightly better you also know it should be for a part when still an Interval.

Everything belongs for a part when it could relate so next only compared for different context.

C --> I

But also we know that order should not matter ... only sorted so next it becomes the parts you could (or are willing to) choose.

So if there existed no such thing as believed also you should not ... for a part because not needed but could be still there.

Such a thing should be work in progress but following a straight line without any interruption because cyclic is ... Chaos.

Or maybe that implicit is still part of Chaos so next a circle (or loop) became deviating from the plane (or planar scale) which should still be a line.

Such a thing does not (necessarily) have to resemble but different from what should be the actual thing.

But here that different became only ... so next you have to choose nature for a part which should be ...

My guess is that ... could be the different methods you could make but still only part of nature when explained.

Here different approach(es) is also for different meaning so next it has to meet for ....

But here such a thing became a complete context where I chose to divide ... in three, except not knowing where I should place a ...

For this it could become ". - | -" or "- . -" depending on when a Creator should never be at the end of a Sequence but rather first.

Here the dashes become Euclidean space versus infinity (respectively) when I chose to skip his realm for a temporary part (or place) and replace it
with Supernatural instead.

But, except we do not see such a thing in the (new) Equation and only make it Euclidean space where it could still exist but only for a part.

So if nature could have been created in a single piece (without any interruption) also it should continue when that of cyclic is (only) ...

But for that a circle could still resemble a line for not any other part (instead ) which could be hidden, but only it became a method for such.

Only thinking it should be (for ) a Sequence also a line when not any other part which could be virtual (or dimensional ) and ...

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space

Here this should not be any substitute for believed when only a part but also we could continue for not getting any further when only same context all the time.

So making it any virtual (or ... ) and it became only the different options a Creator could have when already (raw data ) in front of him.

This becomes (only ) a lab or laboratory but only a substitute(? ) when thinking so ... being equal.

Such a thing could be still a correspondence but also equal (or equality ) ... Creator be the same as nature but not ... so.

Here the starting point could be infinitely compressed but not the same as infinity ... nature when it should be different properties.

Only that a transition process could happen for (or between ) life and death but having a different context when a ... point.

But for this it became only an Euclidean space created in advance for not thinking it should be any divine for only ... than believed.

For this I made a Creator uncertain but should be for both himself and the .. we made prospect or hierarchical structure.

Such a thing could be ... or topmost point where Euclidean space could attach when still only recursive Topology.

Here such a thing only becomes (or becomes only) endless when it should be for nature when also divine.

Making a Creator resemble himself for a property when still infinity is not a thing I do not dare or think of (about) and for that ... becomes a limit.

At some place he chose to discard or throw out ... into or for nature when the other (or rest ) could be wasted.

Could a Creator be ... a Janus face and that should be versus himself and nature (complete ) and not any Divinity for its ... part.

For this it could become an interchange not only happening in nature but also ... for (when ) connected through the slit, and (here )
uncertain about (whether) it should be his realm or Divinity instead.

So next only mirrored and Divinity should ... be equal when only nature from end to end for only the quantized it could be, except also
... another context when Divinity.

To me these parts could be still separate(d) but next hard to quantize the slit for an opening when it could be located in between.

Only that everything (or three-part ) could float when still not any attached, but here it became a prospect or hierarchical structure instead.

Making nature uncertain (for everything ) and it also becomes a Creator when complete for all parts except he ... still above.

The problem here is location of above when still not any besides when making it a (four- ) dimensional structure but he could be still in charge.

Only for making nature first he also should exist but next only time defined for a Sequence so here ... in advance.

His limit become here creating when not ...
ID: 2145005 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145006 - Posted: 8 Jan 2025, 21:48:23 UTC
Last modified: 8 Jan 2025, 22:04:09 UTC

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/biggest-questions-about-universe-beginning/

And just a short one, but if this could be a corridor for not any bar everything inside becomes cascaded and for that still only cyclic.

Or meant Chaos when still not any cyclic, but here it should be implicit for only a part.

So make it recursive and it could be still thrown away or wasted for a part, except that universes could be created in consecutive order.

Or make it oblong when still a cylinder so next it could lie besides each other within Euclidean space like a potato (or carrot) srubber (of metal).

Forgot, but this should be still about UFO's or extraterrestrials, so here one video took the breath away from me, and I have watched many.

I think some could be impressed by only colors visible but also it could be Supernatural.

Yes, I know inside does not sound any good so making it placement or position instead.
ID: 2145006 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145094 - Posted: 11 Jan 2025, 1:57:17 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jan 2025, 2:18:13 UTC

Be my guest when not any believing or thinking, or maybe it was Christchurch here instead.

Or maybe such a place should be located at New Zealand, so next a ... or parable.

No, but here a Paradigm at first, but not the word that got to me.

Perhaps he could be self-excused for also self-implicit and next opposite for that of meaning.

Ding-ding, I know it becomes wrong for that of located for place.

Just underbelly and it could be having color and also move.

Here transient needs to be explained but not having that.
ID: 2145094 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145095 - Posted: 11 Jan 2025, 2:20:14 UTC
Last modified: 11 Jan 2025, 2:28:35 UTC

So if I thought it was a part for existing also quantized for nature.

But if infallibility could be a part of Logic also Religion, and next also nature.
ID: 2145095 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145141 - Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 21:26:39 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jan 2025, 21:27:46 UTC

You have the Donald Trump just below Climate Change so skimmed through there.

But also I am living at present for just today when only knowing what happened in the past and not the future.

Perhaps the world has become a little smaller and should be visible in all things we do today while others hidden.

So for that it could be still a mystery for also hidden part but should be at least part of the nature we could comprehend.

I think that nature should not be single but tilt in a direction for same meaning when it also has been created in the same way.

Regardless of mysteries it also becomes objects and next only part of believed which should be functional for a machine instead.

Such a thing becomes nature for a meaning and next also prove for the context it should be.
ID: 2145141 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145142 - Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 22:05:23 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jan 2025, 22:24:51 UTC

And now ran empty or faded away but I poured water in the coffee cup or cup of coffee before adding first.

If nature could be a single Sequence when a loop is an implicit delay, also it could be having no borders when (thinking) it should be an
Euclidean space divided into multiverses for having corridors in between.

But that should be the Force of gravity for connecting so next we could make it a dream instead, which should be through a slit only because it
was multidirectional for not any unidirectional which could be nature for only happening one way.

Such a thing as a dream should be only a part like others, but also we could make it UFO's for their presence and also they could be flying.

The problem is (here) that a dream could happen but next for undefined (or unknown) location or placement when we do not know our own position so next it becomes relative.

Or relative for any context for also meaning so next only believing.

But next the failure is that I could still continue and next past the Sequence (which should be only to the left) and meet up with a Creator which should always be ahead
only because he should be better for the context we could make.

But such a thing could be still both a UFO and also a dream and next we have to prove each (separate) thing.
ID: 2145142 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145146 - Posted: 12 Jan 2025, 23:34:21 UTC
Last modified: 12 Jan 2025, 23:39:33 UTC

Or could just a dream happen in the brain so next I could be off but also should be a space which should not be empty.

More that if it could be relative also it could happen anywhere so next I only was confused.

Difference is only a part so next it also could be space when at least existing, but for that should not be any dream.

Or maybe it was complemented instead so next it could be the part I could choose.

But for that I also could trust my Mind when still relative, but next for only the purpose it should be used for.

So here I could separate a difference from the other which should be relative and coffee first.

But for that both ">" and "<" when above or below, but here I am still only off for not any sleeping.

Next I only thought it should be a difference but also complemented into Chaos.

Such a thing could be a hidden track but only for a Sequence which has already been created.

Failure is here a difference but also it could be Chaos when implicit so next it became Divinity for another Force.

Just thinking it could be sideways also parallel and juxtaposed is not any needed.

But for such a thing also a Creator could differentiate when having options available but next only words instead.
ID: 2145146 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145147 - Posted: 13 Jan 2025, 0:07:13 UTC
Last modified: 13 Jan 2025, 0:11:19 UTC

But if lights could be only visible also it could be a precondition for what should be behind, and next Supernatural.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural

But also that when still leveled for also compared but not any more when quantized but only context meant for.

Or rather thinking nature could exist at a level when it also should be more for compared.

Perhaps it could be still levers when sitting behind but also gravity for a Force when a Sequence for not any implicit for the other meaning.

But for such a thing I also thought it was a UFO for not any Supernatural so next also a difference for such a thing.

Here failure could be wrong and next for all meaning when relative.

So could I next continue on a Sequence it should be implicit for its order and also a Creator which could be failing when divine.

But for that it also becomes failing force when divine and it becomes a difference between himself and nature.
ID: 2145147 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145210 - Posted: 14 Jan 2025, 19:26:10 UTC

So here restarting for running slow, but Norton wants to install VPN over a line I already have, and think it is my ISP and not Samsung.

Or perhaps thinking it is Telenor for my ISP so need editing a little.

The only is that I loose the factorizations I have and have to restart a second time for not any twice instead.

My suggestion is that you should use a connection already defined before setting up a new one, or perhaps I could do it myself.

For that VPN is perhaps not always needed but still you have to know which line you have.
ID: 2145210 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7405
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2145263 - Posted: 16 Jan 2025, 3:47:35 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DJNMhRjaozE

So sweet when only replicating (or trying) but here it becomes terns when still black and white for feather and caring for its children.
ID: 2145263 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 342 · 343 · 344 · 345 · 346 · 347 · 348 . . . 350 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.