Worthy of a comment so you earned an OH!

---

Thanks, betreger, but found the text search feature here, but next fixing the small bug in the previous…

At least I happen to know.

Seek help

---

Yes, thingy here betreger, and next fixed that as well.

I hate to see you go, except for not only the comma of myself.

Now I lost the point again, for also that of an intended meaning.

Just trying right now, because of losing it again, for that of just thinking.

Make it a try, for still also an attempt, and next not any figuratively, for only significantly, except not any
absolutely either.

Just to tell that it became only that thing just going down the drain here, and next what sad.

Could I just return back to that of a flipover, except not any turn around, for that of a Century either?

Purpose could still make for a Fact, except not any meaning either, but rather still looking at Creation from the point of science, meaning opinion, or Perspective view.

The debate for what you could perhaps see, for next also make, for that of Dark Matter, versus Dark Energy, is perhaps not mine this time, and not necessarily for that of provability either, when just only science.

Could we make it science for just such a thing, except not any "this" for also "that", and next also flat science as well, except for things we could perhaps know, for also being told?

Thinking that perhaps questioning nature with respect to any Religion, and next perhaps still only thinking, except not any questioning either, and here another sentence ending up just short.

But rather still science for that of any Religion, except not any given or intended purpose either, for just only matters, and perhaps not thinking about myself either.

Everything included, and next also all as well, for just only the thing I meant to say, except for not any value added, for just only counting either.

Rather than just possibility, for also significance as well and here the same forget for that of an issue, if not wording either.

Hmm, set and forget, but NOT, for just nothing, should not mean any everything either, for just only significance.

Like delving into a subject, also digging as well, because attempting, perhaps not any fool either, just of yourself.

Death could still be a possibility, for also a Probability as well, except for not any natural cause either.

The Pluralism we could be still making for a couple of things (and not only deities), could still be about a nature we could try to understand, except not any seek for such a thing either.

But next "everything included", for perhaps also all, and next making it that as well, for only things you perhaps could know.

Significance should perhaps still mean, except for not imply either, when still just only counting.

But next rather a battle of sorts, for not any raising of the sails, for perhaps not any Captain of the seas either.

Make it perhaps Mortality for a given entity, and perhaps only your physical body, except not your soul either.

Is infinity still the final thing, for that of everything included, and could we still make it science of it,
for only that of such a context, if not any notion either?

Or maybe rather part versus whole once again, because perhaps still everything being included, except for not any food for just your given taste either, when perhaps rather that of Truth.

Still only death one possibility for such, except not making it any different possibilities, for that of maybe questions being asked, for also raised as well.

Any solutions for that of the world, and next not any questions asked either, for rather an answer.

Perhaps thinking that an answer could be still better than just a question, and next the possible Methodology behind, for that of such a question.

If perhaps still making it some five fingers, for also toes as well, also that of nature given as well, except for not any Thought either, for only that of being just on Mind.

Only a shortcut here, except not any straight way out either, for just making it the nature you could perhaps see, and next also believe in.

Is it next stiill that of "this versus that", except not any tit for tat either?

If nature could be offering a number of possibilities, next also different ways of explaining it as well,
except for not any "over and out" either, for just only a cheap alternative.

But rather a final end, for that of perhaps not any beginning either, for only left stuck as usual, except not any portal, for a frontispiece (needs checking), when perhaps still only a beginning, for also an end.

Here again losing out a little, except for still only a notion of time telling about one given possibility, except for a pluralistic manifold for such.

Set and forget, except for still not making it a couple of other things either.

But rather all, for next also everything as well, and perhaps not any set and forget either.

Pluralism, and here Mathematics, could still be manifold, for just the thing we perhaps could also know.

But if rather that of Heuristic, for that of a Heuristic principle, still five fingers, for also toes, except for the thing you could perhaps still know.

Is Heisenberg just quantifying a little for just only numbers, or could it still be a matter of fact, for just only Truth instead?

Or maybe just only count on science instead, for making it a given Truth, rather than a matter of Fact instead.

Yes, I know, but if just thinking, only speculating a little, and next it becomes alternative science here.

The fact here is that we are not supposed to make it any Creator, for also a deity as well, for only seeing is believing, if not any versus either, but if perhaps the "operand" here, for that of Logical NOT, or conjunction, perhaps even better, if still not there either.

But next perhaps NOT any smile either, for making it any Logic, when it perhaps should be only Arithmetic instead.

Is the science you could make of a couple of things, only on thin ice for such a thing, for only such a thing being fragile, for just only validity?

Or is it still the answer we perhaps already "knew", for only making it a scientifical fact here, rather than just speculate?

Ambiguity is perhaps not any hidden card, for also secret, for also a Contradiction as well, except for still only a Fact of nature, for perhaps both.

Rely on a given Fact, and next checking tomorrow here, for that of a possible answer, or workaround.

Edit:

Still the small versus large for a couple of things, except for not any simpler either, for only that of even complexity, if not any larger either, for only that of the very small.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=82821#1929807

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

But for a moment, I was also thinking about the Field equations of Einstein here, when also thinking about a Universe which could still be around, and also present.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_equation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_field_theory

Could someone fix the first link, for only that of empty space, if perhaps not the latter ones perhaps dealing with much the same?

Does 2+3 equal 5, for just 2+3=5, or is it rather false, because a language like Prolog, is perhaps not directly about Logic itself?

If perhaps so, not necessarily any Jesus hanging on the cross either, for a bit of bad language, except for not any double cross, for that of acts and deeds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Cross

Here something like that of a betrayal of sorts, when next looking a little down the page.

Perhaps Arithmetic is not necessarily any Equation either, at least not always, but for the same reason, not any Logic itself, for just telling about properties of nature,
when perhaps only Proof itself.

If perhaps rather a double meaning instead, we could make it Logic part of Proof, for only that of a Method, except for still not believing in any God, for that of a deity,
when only the subject of Religion.

Next keying in "Religious fallacy", for only an attempt of such, at the Wikipedia, and try for yourself here, and next see what you get.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven%27s_Gate_(religious_group)

You do not have to make it any religious cult here, except for Religion itself, when our aim is still that of looking for intelligent life in space,
except for only discrediting both people, and also reports, for that of observations which sometimes could be made.

The double cross you still could be making of a couple of things, is that of Logic, for still a Method of Proof, except for still only a Universe filled with those Equations,
except for still not any eyes wide open, for only a couple of things which could be told.

Now I will be having to make a new post, for that of a couple of new ideas perhaps coming up in my mind.

Could you make it no as an answer, except for still not any yes either, and next think it could be still only Logic, except not any Religion?

Hair in the soup perhaps, except not any soup boiling over either, but here being reminded about Sean Connery, for only that of arms being held on the back,
except for not any twisted body either.

The Logic you perhaps could make of a couple of things, could also be implied as well, for only meant to be for such, except for not any Christianity,
for only that of Religion, when still only the cross.

Rather lead back, when next also imply as well, because science is perhaps still not any Religion either, except for rather only believing in a God,
for only that of goodwill, if not any sanity either.

The wrong, for also erroneous thing as well, is that of making it deities for a couple of things, except for still only the Laws of nature which we could know about,
because of both elementary particles, and also their individual properties, except for not any belief in UFO's either, for only that of an extraterrestrial presence.

Ready, set, go, but if perhaps believing in such a thing, still those Fundamental Laws of nature, which could be making for certain Principles,
except for not assuming any divine entity behind, for sometimes that of Creation as well.

You know, bacteria and viruses almost everywhere around, but still that of twist and shout, for perhaps not God any left handed either, for sometimes only that of Religion for a given approach,
except for not any hand for science either, when perhaps rather the better thing.

Perhaps nature is still provable in one given way or another, except for not always the mirror either, but if still only that of Creation for things being made, also that of everything around as well,
for such a thing as well, and perhaps not always about provability either.

Make it rather Certainty instead, and you could end up with a Premise, except for still only Logic, for the sake of Mathematics, except for still not any nature either, for only that of given Laws.

The Atheist you could be, for also Agnostic as well, could be telling about perhaps not any God at all, for only a divine entity for such, but perhaps the reason here,
is that we still could be making it Religion.

You do not always question nature for what it is, but rather take it for granted, except for not any bucket of water either, being just an ice cube, when rather in a frozen state.

The open hand you perhaps could show, could next reveal yourself, except for not showing any more either, for only the face of yourself, and for this sometimes that of recursive Logic,
or perhaps structure.

But rather that we could be making it more, for also that of less, for only that of enumeration, except for still not any layers, for still only that of thick sheets of ice.

Making it rather evolution, and it becomes development as well, for only an evolution of the brain, for that of recognizing certain facts around us, including those related,
or pertaining to nature.

Because of that, it becomes that of knowledge, and next also Facts as well, and if not wrong, it could still end up with a Premise, for only that of ways of knowing such facts.

Einstein could perhaps make it "that's it" for a couple of things, except for still not any blunder either, but at least we should know about nature, for only that of Certainty for such,
except for still asking a couple of questions.

Assuming certain Laws, and you could be still taking nature for granted as well, except for what it sometimes mean, for only that of Facts.

Making it both Ambiguity, for also Contradiction as well, it could end up being a nature which you sometimes could not tell about, for only that of complexity,
if still not any "reveal yourself" either.

Are we assuming a divine entity perhaps behind certain Laws, for only that of Creation, or could we still make it only Order versus Chaos, for only that of Arithmetic,
if perhaps still not any Logic either?

Still a couple of beers left in the fridge…

Perhaps rather only the difference between a punctuation mark, for that of a comma here, except not any question mark either,
for rather only a smile.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perplexity

Eyes open, for also sometimes shut as well, except not any wildest dreams either, for only sweet ones for such, in that making it observational facts,
for also possible visitors as well, either I could be still only dreaming for such, except for not any cold day for such either.

Translates into "daydreaming" here, but if perhaps rather a failure of sorts, also an admission of failure as well, except for still taking a couple of things for granted.

Count from zero to infinity, and perhaps not any middleman either, for just being 170141183460469231731687303715884105727, because if you happen to be a witness,
for sometimes one for such as well, could it still be that of "dismiss" for perhaps science not believing?

My guess is that Facts alone could perhaps could be telling the better thing, except for not any Certainty either, for only "reveal yourself", because if doing so,
you could still be questioning nature for what it actually is, and not what it is supposedly meant to be.

Look at the celestial sky, for only its visibility, and next also appearance as well, and except for still any splendor and glory, could you perhaps make it a random distribution of sorts,
because it could be a compromise between total Chaos and perfect symmetry, except for not any Anarchy either?

One example of such, is the Big Dipper, where you could be able to recognize a constellation, for only its visual appearance.

But if rather making it numbers instead, could you make it a random distribution here, except for still not only Order out of Chaos, for sometimes that of prime numbers?

One thing is perhaps still making it God for that of a certain way of approach, for only that of Belief, except for still only science itself,
where it could be only that of numbers.

Making it both microcosmos, for only that of elementary particles as well, and you could make it certain Laws as well, except for still only the objects of space,
where perhaps rather the Universe instead, for that of Cosmos.

But rather perhaps Dr. Watson here, for just elementary instead, except for still not asking any fundamental questions, when also answers for such also needed as well,
because here ending up perhaps thinking that Logic could still be the answer to much, except for only those things still about nature around us.

Or perhaps dealing with nature instead, because like a flaw, sometimes a blunder as well, except for not "believing" in a nature as well, for only that of Certainty or even Facts.

If rather making it a Mathematical model of the Universe, it could end up being a GUT here, and here thinking that at least an attempt is being made,
in order to solve a couple of problems.

Logic is perhaps not telling about "is" for also "not is", or does not exist perhaps, but if perhaps so, still that NOT, for only the opposite thing, if not any inverse either.

Raise your right arm, except for perhaps not any left either, and perhaps not any "belief", for sometimes just proving as well, because you may see here,
for also recognize as well, that there could be at least one thing around, for that of a single thing, except for not any proven in a different way either,
for only that of a statement for such, except not any wording or phrase either.

If perhaps asking what is just "enough", perhaps that of infinity could be sufficient, when next only quantizing a little, except for still not making it any divine entity,
for perhaps a Creator of sorts, when rather making it God instead.

Lurking in the shadows, and perhaps also mentioned as well, but if perhaps rather a famous Equation here, we could also be making it God as well, for only a Creator,
when perhaps thinking about the Universe, for what it perhaps is meant, for also implied as well.

For a good reason, perhaps still that of Implication, for just only Logic itself, except for still not any reasoning either, when only just Reason, and next a way of thinking as well,
for only making it God, when perhaps still only Certainty, for also that of Facts.

Therefore perhaps not any good reason for just explaining it away either, when perhaps making it other civilizations in space, for also Intelligences as well,
except for still such a thing resting on the fact of just Logic itself, for that of Mathematics.

Intelligent civilizations perhaps, and next still questioning nature for only that of Logic, except for still only a couple of Facts,
because if still "Elementary dear Watson", for a couple of things, perhaps a reason of believing in nature, for only making it such a thing as well.

Or perhaps rather the hammer and saw instead, for perhaps not any nail either, when it rather could be the feather instead, and next we could also know,
for only that of giving an answer back in return.

It could still be the question mark here, except for not any comma, or punctuation mark either, but perhaps still a reason of questioning nature, for only that of science itself,
except for still only making it Religion, for only that of Belief,

Even the better moment of time, does not make everything clear, or evident either, so please bear with me here.

In the old days, sailors could make it "Argo Navis" for a celestial constellation of the sky, except for still not any Vela either.

Just think, and next also believe as well, except for still not make it any Method of Proof either, for only that of a certain Fact.

The other word perhaps, for also a wording as well, and next perhaps not any Conclusion either, when only that of a certain Fact.

Make it "Belief", and perhaps still only Religion for such, except for not any Certainty, for also a given Credibility as well, and you could end up
with the Method of Proof, for only that of certain Facts.

If perhaps rather a nature, for also that of false versus true, if not "only" so, perhaps better as well, for only the thing we could be making of it.

Perhaps we already know, for making it Certainty here, for also Proof as well, except for not deeming anything hopeless either, for just not in vain,
for perhaps not any fruitful at all, and here being reminded about that of Methodology.

You see, but except for still not all roads leading to the city of Rome, we could still make it only Creation here, for that of a way of seeing,
except for perhaps not believing either, for only the subject of Religion.

"All included", and perhaps everything as well, except for not any previous, for that of next either, when sometimes only that of Religion as an issue,
except for not any Ethics either, for just only goodwill.

Make it rather the leaves on the trees, except for not any somber mood either, and perhaps still questioning nature, rather than perhaps a God behind,
for just only a thing possibly being meant, if perhaps not (directly) implied either.

Making it only Laws, for only that of such, except for not any Laws itself, and still only the Universe for what it could also be meant, or perhaps implied,
except for not any reasoning behind, which could be making for a possible Creator, except for not "implying" such a thing either.

Better finish up with a summary of things instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

Yes, skipping on just that one, except for not any butter and bread, for that of the surface of the table either.

Please have me excused, but thinking here that I got almost to the point, for that of a subject.

Take it for granted, and perhaps also meant as well, except for only telling, for that of perhaps making it yes or no, for only that of a certain Fact.

Make it that of Certainty, and next also questions being asked as well, for only a nature around us, except for still only taking a couple of things for granted,
and making it just true, for also that of "sure".

But rather that "Absolutely", for also skipping, or perhaps jumping, if not any strolling either, could perhaps be telling about a couple of Facts,
like that of walking on the Moon, except for not telling about any Certainty, for only that of Logic itself, or perhaps even nature.

The manifold which you perhaps could be making of nature, should be that of multitude as well, except for not any "plethora" either,
for only a couple of things standing, because if still only the subject of Religion, perhaps not a reason of believing a single thing,
for also proving as well.

Becomes wrong here, for only making it manifold a given property of nature, except for still only eyes which could be able to see,
for just only infinity, because the other alternative could perhaps be wrong, for not making it any Belief for that of Certainty either.

If perhaps still only the prewritten book, for that of nature itself, next take and give as well, for only that of a certain Belief,
except for not making it any Fact of it either, for sometimes only a Belief being wrong, for only that of Fact instead, if perhaps not any Proof.

Do you see the smile in just the "=" here, or should I perhaps rather make it better, for that of small versus large caps instead?

Previous and next, for also the day before as well, and perhaps the notion of time here, except not any "see you around", hoping for the best,
if perhaps not any better moment of time as well either, for only part time science for such, except for still not any "whole" either.

We perhaps could know it all right now, for also knowing it better as well, except for still not any infinity as part of a given "whole" either,
for just only that of a Principle.

Guess what, but we could be still making it Religion here, for perhaps a way of believing in a couple of things, if not looking at such things either.

Just thinking here, and next infinity for just what we already know, if perhaps not just thinking either, and next also science as well, for just only a Method.

Assuming, and next also implying as well, and perhaps not any Equation either, when next only making it God.

Could you make it a Creation for just that of a given thing, except for not any specific either, and still only those Laws making, or pertaining for science,
except for still not any divine entity behind, for perhaps a Creation meant to be, for also sometimes implied as well?

Getting tired of this, but perhaps you got the point here, namely that an Implication should perhaps be for that of Logic here,
except for not any "meant to be", for that of Creation itself.

If rather a "Justification" instead, could you perhaps make it God just even handed for a couple of things, except for not any "Implication" either,
for just only Logic?

Make it rather a step closer, for perhaps not any revert, or reversal back either, and we still could perhaps think of Creation resting on its laurels,
except for not any resting back either.

Some people could choose to make it a vicious nature, for only that of eyes which could see, except for not any malice, or malicious either.

Makes me think about a "Steady state" here, except for perhaps not any Model of the Universe either, for that of a possible alternative,
because here still that of Big Bang, versus Steady State, except for not the first one, more readily being accepted.

Volcanoes if you like here, if perhaps not any depicting, for just making it either, and sometimes only a model for such, if not anything else either.

Making it a single whole, for rather that of a subject instead, and you could make it that of infinity as well, for only just thinking about it.

Knowing it all, for also most as well, perhaps skilled, or educated as well, if not any such either, and next speaking about given possibilities, when still only that of nature.

Do you next phrase a couple of things, except for not any paraphrasing either, and next think that infinity is perhaps most or all, of just everything?

The fireman could be still climbing the ladder, except for not extinguishing any fire, for also that of Comprehension we sometimes could be making out of just science.

Next, or previous, and perhaps not any saturated either, but next what about possible skill, except for still not any idiot for such,
when perhaps making it Comprehension for a couple of things, and also speaking about possible levels?

Make it rather an ambition for that of a certain Logic, and perhaps not the same either, for just all and everything being included (still only Logic).

Make it rather a digger for a couple of things, and it could be a big hole somewhere, for also a hay of stack as well, and still only counting.

Yes, give me a smile if you will, and perhaps still not any "=", for just only Logic either, when perhaps also Creation as well, for also making it perhaps God.

Spell it wrong instead, and for some reason I could make it a scientific God here, except for still not only a couple of things implied, for perhaps also meant to be.

The Logical Implication which you could perhaps be making a "Law" itself, for only perhaps that of Certainty, is perhaps not any "facet" of nature either,
for just only meant, if not perhaps being implied either, when also that of God as well, for only that of a notion (or maybe rather Aspect).

It is really that of making a cake here, for perhaps not any "bottoms up" either, for just only made, if perhaps also in advance as well,
but next "think" of it as well, for perhaps making it the Laws of nature just something different, and perhaps not the thing you did not expect.

Yes, still that of scientific Laws, for also that of provability, and next also Facts as well, but where is next God in all of this, except for not making it any puzzle either?

Is accepting a couple of Facts, also adhering to a couple of issues, except for still not adhering to Moral facts, for that of questions themselves?

Making it that of a certain God (for only a given Principle), and next also adhering to a couple of standards as well, except for not any given Method.

The God you could perhaps be making of it, could next be "all and everything", for also setting such a standard as well.

Making it rather "yes" or "no" instead, and you could end up believing in an alien being instead, except for not any Certainty for that of nature, where also that of possible Proof.

Posting here, for not any losing either.

Or maybe only vice versa, for perhaps not any attribute either, when at least Einstein being a wise man, for also skilled, and next also daring as well.

The offspring, for also diversion as well, could be that of going the wrong way for a couple of things, except for still not making it any whole for that of an answer,
when perhaps rather that of infinity instead.

Just "Go to Hell", except for not visiting any angels either, and just only an encounter for such, except for perhaps not any meeting either, when next only a tell tale story,
for also a short story as well, if not any large caps either.

The singularity which could be making for Black Holes, should be the Force of gravity for such, being only responsible for such a thing, and next not any factor either,
when it perhaps could rather be that of a given whole, for only a physical entity, or object for such.

But next life still here on Earth, like also the rest of the Universe as well, for that of the remaining part, which makes me think that even infinity is perhaps not all either,
for just everything, when also that of a single whole.

The dark chapter which you could be making a "thing" as well, is perhaps not any blowing of your nose either, but here I did not find a better word.

But rather it could be different things, if sometimes making it that of angels or spirits for a couple of things, except for not any physical entities either,
when it perhaps could be only ourselves, for also a nature we could still explain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscience

Still having the dinner here, and therefore also confusing Conscience with that of Comprehension, when still only the middle of the day.

Looking around, and perhaps not any better word than Concept either, when possibly also an offspring, for also a diversion as well,
when only going the wrong way, for that of a direction.

So, if still not any "absolutely" either, it could rather be an attribute instead, for that of thing also being attributable, for just being part of the subject.

Making it so, and that of Philosophy comes to mind, except for not any guesswork either, when just only thinking a little.

If still a nature for a thing you perhaps could make of it, also that of a separation or divider, for making it at least two different things,
when making it any God, for also that of still only nature.

If rather one thing versus another, for also two different things as well, also that of infinity for making it a given whole, for only that of nature,
except for not any similar whole, for just only God instead.

Perhaps the Greek could still make it some four different elements, for only a nature they could know, and also explain, when also that of modern science,
for just only ourselves, making it Quarks instead, for also that of galaxies, and clusters of galaxies visible in the sky.

For that, it becomes two different Terms as well, except for not any notion for any Creation either, when it could be still only the world of science.

If still a difference between two or more things, also that of numbers, for also enumeration as well, except for not any scalar field, for just levels of Intelligence.

Jump the wagon a little, if not any bandwagon either, because here tempted to skip that of enumeration, for only that of scalar instead, for also scale as well,
because we should also know about the Field equations of Einstein.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level

Part time business, for also that of leisure as well, and it could be that of Logic for only Mathematics, except for still not any vice versa, or versus, for just only the opposite.

The explainable world which you could make still the Universe, should be that of the Method of Proof for such, and for that, also an Implication as well,
except for still not any vice versa, for only the opposite.

So, if still only a leisure time for a couple of things, except not any work either, is perhaps Logic one thing for just only a subject, except for not any Probability either,
when it perhaps is not about any proving either, for only the Method of Proof?

Perhaps it still could be just only a smile for a couple of things, except for not any grin either, when at least true should be the opposite of false,
except for not telling about any inverse either.

If still rather a fireman only, you could be climbing the ladder, except for not any stairs either, and therefore not making it any Portal either, when it could be
perhaps reaching for God, except for not making it any stars of the sky either.

The best we could make of it is just saying "yes" for also "no", except for not any NOT either, for that of the opposite answer, when also that a meaning.

Reaching for a goal, and it could be striving as well, except for not making it any infinity such an endpoint, for also an end of the game as well.

Making it rather levels of Intelligence, and perhaps also Conscience as well, for only being factors for such, and next also part of a given whole as well.

Still the dinner around, for also a bit of sweat as well, so therefore not any good right now, but looking for that of an endpoint in the text,
and it becomes that of a terminator for such a thing as well, except for not any spinning around either, for just going in a circle.

Time could be still spinning around, and perhaps someone made a drawing in the sky, for that of making it infinity, but also that of Special Theory here as well,
when still only the notion of time, and therefore only spinning around a little, because of that.

Could you make it any Abstract and Concrete, for that of time, if perhaps still only a notion, except for not any fourth dimension either, for only the Universe?

It could still be that of reality only for a place you could be making it, including yourself, but if perhaps still the unexplained for a couple of things,
it should not necessarily be that of Religion either.

Rather make of it instead, except for not any make and break either, and levels of Comprehension should perhaps be only Intelligence instead,
except for not any part versus whole either, when also that of time with respect to a given whole as well.

If it rather could be late at night, like that of a previous post, perhaps it could be better, but if making it two different things for a couple of things,
perhaps only subtraction, for that of making a difference, except for not any indifferent either, for just only an attitude.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negation

Try adding here instead, except for perhaps not any subtraction either, for only that of a difference, for just being on my mind right now.

It still could be just "I am", for just only sitting here, and next also the chair as well, except for not any place of living either, when just only the Earth.

Perhaps it could be still a good thing throwing out the subject of Religion, except not any notion of God you perhaps might have, for rather infinity instead,
but except for that, we could be still using one Method for that of another, by just only choosing, if not any selection either for such a thing.

If making it such a thing as "There exists no angels or spirits", for also gods as well, where is the negation here, for also subtraction as well,
when it could be still only "is", rather than just only a smile instead ("=").

Could we rather make it a winner for such, by only questioning nature for possible answers being given back or returned,
or could we think that numbers could still be only such a winner for a nature which perhaps could be explained?

Or could you rather be making it Logic instead, for not making it such a thing either (still only nature), when perhaps rather such a thing instead?

The world of science which you still could be making numbers as well, should be about a nature which should be understood, and for that also levels of Intelligence,
for also Comprehension as well, because it should be the thing you supposedly could make of it.

The thing you sometimes could make possible, should also be making for the impossible as well, not necessarily because of a burden, or impractical way of thinking,
for also a Method as well, because there also could be a thing possible, for not impossible as well, and next at least Mathematics for one thing, but perhaps not the other.

Either it could be that of set and forget, except for not any Set either, where it could be still one thing for that of another, like also versus another,
but if a thing could still be impossible, it could also be "Mission impossible" for such, except for not any science going wrong, for just telling it wrong.

If God could still be an expert in grammar, also that of wording as well, for only a way of such, except for not any phrasing, or paraphrasing either,

If still only one Universe for the thing we could make of it, perhaps not any setup either, but rather the way it perhaps was constructed, for also being defined.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct

Here that of Construct in the past or previous, except for not any method of Construction either, when just building a house, for also road,
but except for that, still perhaps Abstract and Concrete as well, for making it sometimes angels only, except for not anything which still could be proven,
because making it Ave Maria instead, it could end up being the subject of Religion instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hail_Mary

Perhaps still not "To the point" for any Philosophy, when perhaps rather science instead, except for perhaps in the wrong order here.

If perhaps still only such a thing as Blasphemy, for only showing contempt for that of a deity, for also reverence as well,
could it perhaps be a reminder of a way we could approach science as well, for sometimes not believing a single thing, for the debunker you perhaps could be?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

Need to look back for that of a written book it perhaps became, except for not any prewritten story either, for a thing which perhaps became told,
but next not necessarily the Bible either, because I did not have that in mind either, for that of the previous post.

But rather that it could be a different way of looking at nature, for also sometimes forgetting as well, except for still not explaining everything,
for also not having all the details.

Perhaps a skilled one, for also educated as well, could still be a Theologist for such, except for not any simple priest either, but next he could be explaining everything
within his frame of reference, for only the subject being at hand.

If rather know, sometimes not knowing as well, and here some of us could be left speculating as well, for also fantasize for only the subject of multiverses and the like,
when still only the thing which could be known, for next also proven.

If perhaps so, why not make it gods and angels instead, for a world which you perhaps could not explain, except for still only fantasizing a little, in a similar way?

Einstein could make it a couple of Equations, for only that of Facts, except for not necessarily proving everything all the time either, but except for that,
nature could still be that single or precise thing, for also specific as well, because one thing could be still part of another, for also belonging in such a way.

Proof should still mean Proof itself, regardless of any Fact, for also statement, and therefore you could also reach a Conclusion, when goals could also be reached.

Any better, for not any worse either, and perhaps that of betterment here for such a thing, except for not any "absolutely" either, which could be telling about a given whole.

For some reason, 2+3 could still be 5, for only that of a smile, except for not any relational Logic either, which could be telling about a possible similarity.

Rather we could end up with still that of infinity, for that of making it a single whole, except for not telling about any details either, for only being present.

It still could be a way of life, for just living, of course, and next also the Universe in front of us, for only telling about such a thing, except for still not any part versus whole,
which rather could be telling about everything, because details could still be part of a single whole, for also that of parts as well,
except for not making it any Objects or Entities, for only similar things we could observe, for just only seeing.

Like numbers, colors are not any questionable, by also directly so, for not any indirectly either, but rather that we could be making it one thing for next another,
only because it could be the inverse, or opposite, for also vice versa, except for still not any impossible either, for just only loud and clear.

The "Numberphile" you sometimes could be for just only numbers themselves, should not be any easy or cheap way, for just making it simple,
when perhaps rather a notion of Faith or Belief instead.

Therefore the priest still in the church, in front of the altar, if not any pulpit either, for just being high up, and here not necessarily the Pope in mind either,
but next preaching for at least living, except for not any phrasing or paraphrasing either, for just making it one single for that of the other,
except for not any translation either, when perhaps rather an explanation.

It could be fine just making it the Force of gravity, for also time as well, for only a world we could perhaps explain, and also make of it,
except for not any specific formular or sheet, which could be telling about the Moment of Creation itself, and what it perhaps was meant to be.

Making it rather an Equation instead, and you could fill in the details, by only translating into full, for that of numbers, when also that of constants as well,
for also variables, because on the spot, here thinking about Algebra here, for only that of a+b=c, if not any second degree equation either.

Any test tube being held in your hands, and perhaps not any hourglass either, for only being flipped around, but perhaps not any fetus inside,
for only that of fluid instead, and next it could be the repeated event, for also circular as well, when only doing the the thing all over once again.

Could you next make it any infinity, for only that of a loop, except not any spinning around, for just being circular either?

Perhaps still a way of making it science, for also believing in such a thing, except for not any Frame of reference, for only part of time itself.

The three-dimensional world which still could be that of the Universe, could be that of straight lines for such, except for not any vertical walls either,
when also that of curves as well, when it could be the Force of gravity just bending both space and time, for not perhaps not any straight either,
for just only appearance.

Rather jump the tracks a little, and it could end up being a derailment, except for not any "off the hook" either, for only spinning around, and next thinking you could be falling off,
because the circle could still meet with itself, for only that of a closed loop, and next perhaps not any "inner circle" for just only an element instead.

If rather time being the fourth dimension here, it could also be the part responsible for also that of displacing, or dislocating,
except for not any unhinge, or unhinging, which it perhaps ended up being.

If you could be making it the Universe with only respect to itself, where could it be located, when perhaps another reference as well, for just another place?

Rather you could make it stationary only, except for not any wobbling on itself either, for just only rotating, except for not any spinning either.

Forget about eta Cassiopeia here, for only being a splendid double star, and also a magnificent object in the sky, except for things we otherwise could be
making for only our own presence here on Earth.

If rather making it Hyperspace instead, for only that of distance, next such a thing should also mean possible travel as well, except for the time it could take.

Next pull the rope, for only making it a straight line, and next also tension as well, for just only tight, but except for still only the evening here,
perhaps something could be wrong here, for just only noticing, by only the fact that a line should be still having a start, for also end,
except for not any closed loop, for only that of a circle.

Becomes a bit long here, but rather ending up with the notion of time here, for only that of the subject, and almost forgetting the cup of coffee.

And next hanging again, for that of the browser itself, if perhaps not web page either, and for that, it became a restart once again,
losing the running session, including a couple of numbers of interest.

Next it does not detect at least one out of some three disks, so here pulling it out and next inserting once again,
when it becomes only a red diod or bulb lighting up on the motherboard, and a system not booting at all.

This is a hardware error of sorts, and also a quite nasty one as well, in that it has taken quite a while to just only understand,
and when also booting, I have the choice of pressing DEL on the keyboard, for also F8 as well, in order to boot to the BIOS.

Here the order of disks for that of boot up, because it becomes the wrong 3 TB disk when such an error is occurring,
and next it boots to an empty installation for that of Windows 7 instead.

I could leave the computer for at least making at least some 8-10 tasks active when only away, and next it becomes some two at one time,
while the others waiting in the queue, because still having only two cards, and running just the CUDA tasks right now.

I next leave it to others for having fun with a couple of pictures, including both flipping straight around, and also backwards as well,
because any mirroring software should not be any face in the mirror either, and here I just finished up the day.

If still a bit of show, it could be that of a face for such, and next also a strange house as well, and here it became the title of the horror show as well,
but not checking right now, for only that of a smiling face.

Because perhaps still a couple of teeth, next not any grin either, for just being ugly, because if still rather ugly, it should not be any pretty woman either,
for just another similar show.

Read my lips for what I previously said, and it could be levels of Comprehension at times, for also that of Mind, except for not thinking that such a thing as evil
could be part of the picture either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism

Next a bit of Sarcasm instead, for only using the word of my own language, and using Google Translate for making it into English.

Really I was thinking that hot words being made, for also said or mentioned, could be that of hot lips as well, except for still not any kiss either,
because here Sarcasm is perhaps not any ugly thing you perhaps could say for next only wording, except for still not any swearing either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

Could you perhaps make it only a couple of hot lips, for only that of M.A.S.H, or could it rather be that of Antisemitism here, for only that of a sad story of the past,
except for not telling a Jew one single thing either, for perhaps only a reference to just some other guy instead?

Still perhaps a Jew for next the other person as well, if you do not know, but except for that, perhaps no such thing as hatred either, when only an imagined view of nature,
for perhaps rather a Perception, where such a thing could be that of "knowledge" instead, when next entering your mind for next also your soul.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism

But next no such thing as Conceptual mind either, when checking in with the Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_map

I also have the pleasure of listening in to Hans Zimmer, for that of his work, by means of YouTube, and here quite powerful music being available.

Perhaps C-3PO could be regretting a couple of things, for just ending up in the trash, except for not any polished either, which he better could deserve.

Any ultimate winner for a couple of things, and perhaps not any sacrifice either, when just only a loser, but if perhaps still one thing, not necessarily any
disturbance in the force, for perhaps rather making it nature instead, for the Forces which could be making it up, and next also the physical Laws as well.

Winning a game perhaps could be about a lottery as well, except for not any shame when just ending up in the grave, because we could still make it a two part science,
for only a nature still made up of some two parts, for that of a general understanding, and for the same reason we could also be making it Heaven and Hell as well.

For the same reason, we could also be forgetting a couple of Stukas, for just only the Nazi regime, except for still not any suffering or poverty amongst people either.

For the same reason, only that of symbols and swastika for a couple of things, except for not any representation for another thing either,
when it could perhaps mean something else, or different.

In a similar way, I could also be making it a smile for just a pretty woman in the crowd, except for not any lollipop in between her lips either,
for only that of beauty or prettiness.

When also making it a representation, I find it easy to make it a direct representation as well, for just only a given wording, except for still not to the point either,
for just that of a meaning.

In the past, a mirage could also become a Fata Morgana as well, for that of a natural occurring phenomenon, except for still not any "Out of your mind",
for only that of an Imagination.

The mirror is perhaps not any Holocaust either, but still rather a reflection of water in perhaps the visible or earthly sky, when it could also be the sunset as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fata_Morgana_(mirage)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturation

Next you perhaps use a sieve or strainer for just pouring water through, except for still not any pretty face behind the mirror either, because for one thing,
also that of Beauty and the Beast here, except for not any pretty face hiding a possible evil either, for just that of a wicked thing.

Also you could still need a bucket of water as well, except for not any flowers either, when next getting engaged by just asking, if still not any betroth either.

My guess is that Rationality could still be a way of Logic, for just only thinking, except for still not any wickedness either, for just only an evil Conscience,
because if perhaps still only Creation, also sweet dreams as well, for just only believing, if not necessarily any thoughtful Mind, for only the sake of proving.

Here at some 01:45 AM, also a reminder of what Creation is also meant to be, for only just a wording, except for still only making science of the whole thing,
for perhaps not any Religion either.

Ever made it thin ice instead, for that of just a short story, except for still not any unexplained either?

Break a leg, for only an accident, and a splint could perhaps be needed, except for not any plaster or gypsum, for only a bandage, but if rather perhaps pretty music instead,
for sometimes beautiful as well, could you still make it a couple of angels of sorts, when only a two part science for such, except for still only the Method of Proof?

Any loner you perhaps could be, and next also living in the desert as well, for only that of loneliness, except for not any horn in the middle of your face,
for just only a constellation in the sky (Monoceros).

Perhaps continuing in a moment, but need some water first, for only a cold beverage.

One thing perhaps wished for, is that of counting the number of tasks in the task list, because here I need to do it manually.

Selecting all 17 remaining tasks at once, and the Properties button at the left, gets grayed out, or inactive, so here no way of automatically counting.

One Genefer18 task being started up first, and next also completed, taking some 1 hour, 12 minutes, but the promise being made about leaving it off with some 8-10 tasks,
did not held up, and it probably became only some two or three.

Except for that, I could also be left with a sense of sorrow and sympathy for those innocent victims of a violent act, because here some people with a scratch in their head,
not really deserving such a thing either, so here my condolences.

If it still should be that of Antisemitism, and not meant to be any stuck with the word itself, one thing is perhaps knowing that greed could sometimes be a factor,
except for perhaps not always wealth either, for that of a possible fortune, or savings account.

Is Politics sometimes for only growling, or even complaints, it could also be about the world we perhaps know, and also accustomed to, but perhaps not always about habits either.

In the end it could sometimes be that of knowing the complete picture, except for perhaps the difference between sunrise and sunset, for that of just a beautiful day,
because hatred could be a thing among us, like also love and compassion as well, except for not always the correct order of sequence.

Getting rich at times, it could also come with a price as well, so for just only a quarrel on the street, it could also be that of bickering as well.

If perhaps still the sunrise, for also the sunset, except for still the beautiful morning, for also day, perhaps no such thing as perdition either, when perhaps not any headache either.

Either it could be a lack of Belief in the usual way, for also a given way of approach, but as far as I can tell, romance should not be any funeral session either,
for only a notion of death, if perhaps not any soul becoming lost, for only that of similar Mind being included as part of your body.

Therefore both red and blue, for that of colors of the sky, except no waste of blood, for that of crime, or even acts of terrorism, which could sometimes happen.

Only a prism could be needed, in order for the perfect rainbow, except for still not any sun either, for only shining through falling drops of water,
for just the similar thing happening.

Is greed just only a starting point for that of possible evil, or sinister, or could you rather make it Socialism instead, when perhaps also Bolsheviks as well,
for only that of an old Ideology, except for perhaps still only that of the sunrise, for my own intention, or purpose?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolsheviks

Making it still only colors for a couple of things, it could be that of nature in front of you, for also just given hands, except for not any Forces of evil, for that of wickedness.

Being scientists, we could end up skipping the subject of Religion, for only that of colors instead, except for still making up any opinion for that of possible greed,
when it could also be a sense of compassion, for those ending up being just victims.

Perhaps not any Cosmology either, when it sometimes could be the remaining factor, or part, except for still a couple of colors.

In the end we could be making it the Mind, for next also soul as well, except for not any thinking either, when it could be also that of a Conscience,
except for still not any soul, which could be leaving for some other place, only because life could be setting conditions, for only that of survival.

Here perhaps not any medical summary either, but rather the details could be filled in, for a better explanation.

If it could still be only nature first, for also a way of living as well, could it be any such thing as a first hand approach, for also alternative,
except for not any second way of just having the potato chip in the evening, for just flipping over at the end?

If perhaps rather a dream instead, for only just sleeping, perhaps no such thing as a rainbow either, for only just colors, when perhaps no such thing as Truth either.

Is Truth next the same as any Logic, because you sometimes could also prove as well, or could the difference between red and blue, only be that of just nature instead,
for only that of having furniture stacked up in a quite large heap, or perhaps the other wording for this, which I do not have right now.

Making it still nature first, for just that of a session fitting your purpose, could be the way of doing a bit of business, including starting each day, for only running the tasks.

Here it becomes a reminder that such a thing as dreams, are not necessarily any proven, but I already made it that of first, versus second hand approach just above,
except for still not any handmade either, for only just bad wording.

Perhaps you know the picture of Einstein on the bicycle, except for still only threading the pedals, except for not any treadmill being found in a confused mind,
because if perhaps making it Order out of Chaos, if not any versus either, perhaps still Laws of nature for such a thing, except not any unexplained either.

It really becomes that of the mentioned "Options galore", when still that of greed, for only running a business, when perhaps still not any Truth, for only that of Conscience,
when it could be still the Mind of yours, for just only thinking a little.

Making up ones mind, should be that of decision making, except for not being left with a story about your life, for only a summary of such, when next passing away,
and you could be ending up in a grave, because here an angel is perhaps needed, for just making it such a thing.

Any options, and still a bit of decision making perhaps, except for not any similar options, or possibilities telling about any diversity of nature, for just the same thing.

So therefore an offering instead, when perhaps not any bidding either, for just only forbidding, because if perhaps any such offering, it could also be a seanse for this,
and it could end up being such a thing as a trance.

The nature we could perhaps see, and next also make of it, should be that of a plethora for such, because also manifold as well, for only just possibilities.

But if next any similar upper or lower hand, for just an approach, perhaps no given hand either for that of a single whole, when perhaps rather God instead,
for just being the Lord.

Still becoming the Lord here, for only that of asking for mercy, except for no such thing as weakness either, when it also could be that of complacency as well,
but if it could rather be a lack of Belief, because you still could end up being a victim of circumstances, you also could end up in the grave as a result.

If perhaps making it still God for a couple of things, also that of an upper hand for only that of Creation as well, except for still not making it any Creator,
for just only a deity behind.

Any human factor for a couple of things, and such a thing could also be well known, except for still only that of an upper hand, when perhaps only that of
waking up the first time in the morning, is not any Initial moment of Creation, for just any daybreak.

Making it perhaps St. Peter at your side, for that of a final journey, it could be still a decision making of sorts, except for not any summary of your life,
for only recapitulating possible events making up the same thing.

A sin could always be met with a similar degree, or kin, for that of remorse, which sometimes could be an absolution as well, but because still only Religion,
perhaps no such thing as Options galore either, when only a selection method, for that of just possibilities.

Any upper hand instead, and perhaps still only the single hand for such, when Religion should not be about any options being offered, for just only a choice.

If next still only a couple of dreams, for perhaps also the unexplained as well, no such need of feeling any sad either, when perhaps no way of proving either,
because if just only "Tears in the rain" for a couple of things, perhaps no need of knowing either, for just only proving, when still only a bit sad.

Both Wiggo, and also BobDe Woody as well, but I was only looking at the picture here, and did not read the links.

One thing is making it a couple of questions being asked, for that of possible Evidence, if not anything else,
but still there could be sometimes skepticism around, for also debunking as well, except for the way we could be making it science,
for also the different thing.

Here my own planet of sorts, for only the ears and arms as usual when continuing the session, but spell it wrong for questionability, and so on,
you perhaps get at the right stuff at the end, if not any answer either.

We could still make it an alien issue of sorts, for only taking the whole phenomenon for granted, by still asking, except for not any direct evidence,
by making it such a thing as Credibility, for also Facts, if not any proven either.

Perhaps a sense of shame could be the result of an act of senseless thing, but if rather making it lights in the sky, for only that of darkness,
what should next be the other, or perhaps different thing?

Either it could still be just only a blink of an eye, for just what such a thing could perhaps see, if not any still frame on a photograph, for also live video as well,
but if we are rather assuming such a thing, except for still not only a guess either, perhaps it also could be the better thing for science as well.

The fact that we still could make it science for a couple of things, except not any Religion either, could be resting on the fact of just Proof itself,
except not any Method either, but except for that, perhaps still only lights, for only darkness, except not any shadows in the dark either.

Could you sometimes make it just a Method of Exclusion, only because it perhaps should not be any Inclusion either, where possible Facts could
next be taken for granted, for what they only could perhaps be?

Leave it to the debunker, for also skeptic as well, except for not any scientist either, where the whole thing could perhaps rather be proven,
for just a better thing being so.

If the thing being whispered in my ear, that we should rather take it more or less for granted right now, which thing is perhaps meant by betterment,
except for perhaps not any Logic either, when still proving for science?

Could you be proving, next also assuming as well, and for that still a couple of Facts, for the thing it is perhaps meant to be, for not any supposedly so either?

Here with just only the morning cup of coffee, perhaps no better way of saying it, but could be getting back at it later.

I guess it becomes the weekly backup once again, so leaving it in the buffer in the meantime.

All those written Laws, for also rules as well, making for just classic mechanics, if not any similar Laws of gravity either,
should also be the Laws of nature as well, for only the thing we could perhaps understand, for also comprehend,
except not any questions asked, when we possibly could still rule one thing out, for next the other.

Perhaps it could be still only an open door, if not any keylock either, when just having some two eyes, for that of looking at the sky,
except for not any Direct evidence either, when just only such a thing as proving a couple of Facts.

We do have a military exercise going around right now, and the Russians could be testing missiles in the ocean, outside our coastline,
but if a cloudless sky, like that of yesterday evening, I did not notice the Moon, like the previous day or so before.

Because of that, also a couple of flights around, and that should also mean planes as well, for only lights in blue and red, showing their presence.

Next a white object, dipping down back the horizon, for only the hillside across the valley, and next emerging some 20 minutes later,
for only still that of a plane.

Making it perhaps another thing, for also different as well, and possibly a sense of excitement as well, if perhaps a knowledge that it could be a different thing,
but except for that, still that of possible nonsense for it as well, in that it became the thing more of the ordinary, and not the thing you perhaps expected.

The thing you could perhaps make slightly different, is perhaps not any word of mouth either, for that of colloquial of sorts, if not any nickname either,
because if still only a skeptic, you could perhaps be a debunker either, for next perhaps not such a thing which you see, and also believe in.

You are right in that the Moon gets farther away from the Earth each year, and also that it could be proven as well, but if still only eyes which perhaps could see,
should it only be that of resting on a couple of Facts, except not any Direct evidence either?

A movie like Independence Day, perhaps is not any falling in love either, for only such a story, except for rather clumsiness instead, when it rather could be that of
presenting the whole UFO phenomenon to the public, for just let us knowing, if not any believing either, for rather just proving.

If perhaps still a mothership of sorts, could it be the imaginary thing, rather perhaps the thing which could be expected, except for still not any proven either?

If still being perhaps so, it could be the bit of excitement, for also thrill as well, except for not the penny it could be worth, for only that of science.

Perception could still be only for eyes which could perhaps see, and next also tell, except for not any similar thrill, when possibly the unexpected,
when perhaps not the thing it was, or could be expected to be.

Perhaps we could still only quantize a little, for making it just numbers, but on the other hand, a science which is not always quantifiable, could end up being Religion,
except for still not any Mysteries, Magic, and Miracles instead, for only that of science.

If seeing is perhaps still only believing, also that of questions being asked as well, for only that of questionability, except for not any objectivity either,
for just only Facts.

If you happen to be just an Atheist, for sometimes Agnostic as well, perhaps no reason to make it any Aura either, for only just a soul,
except for not any Supernatural, for just only science, when it still also needs to be proven.

If such a thing as Eternity could still be associated with a way of life here on Earth, for only bound to life, we also could make it certain customs as well,
for only that of making respect to a lost, or fallen one, except not any last farewell either.

Again that of life processes here for such a thing, except not filling in all the other details either.

Any Eternity, for also the other word as well, could still be that of Religion for such a thing, except not any alien intelligences either, for that of the similar,
when perhaps still only lights and darkness instead, for also a couple of shadows, when still only a thing being, or left unexplained,
but as you probably know, quantizing should perhaps be possible within the limits or borders of science, except the thing we still could be making Religion.

You therefore need to jump the tracks a little, for perhaps not any bandwagon either, when next assuming that life could still be one thing for such,
except not any eternal life either, for perhaps rather your soul.

Those things we could end up making Stairways to Heaven, for perhaps also a Portal for such as well, could next be that of Religion instead,
except for not making it any immortality either, for still only the soul.

If perhaps knowing that life on Earth could be based on facts of nature, for only that of such a thing as impreciseness, or imperfection, for only physical Laws,
we still could also know our place as well, except not any other intelligences either, which could rather have made it to the stars instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacit_assumption

If not wrong, from looking at the subject of Logic earlier on, but needed looking up here, because if still questioning nature, from only Laws also given,
also possibilities as well, for what you just could be making of it, except for still not any assumptions still left, for only that of other possibilities.

Just assuming a thing, for what it perhaps could be, and next also straight on for such a thing, in that it also could be implied, except for still not any guess,
for only guesswork, when sometimes perhaps not any science at all, for just only Religion.

But rather "Did it happen" for just a couple of things, and next it could only be a melody for such, except for still not any chance of luck either,
for only an observation which could be possible, because when making it perhaps other intelligences, also that of levels of intelligence as well,
for only those terms we could set, in order for perhaps still a difference, except for not the other thing we perhaps could get.

Just straying off a little at the end, for not concluding anything just yet.

Or maybe rather still the sad fact that we could leave it off for a couple of things, next to only those who could be still only debunkers or skeptics,
except for not any thrill or excitement, for just only the opposite, when next thinking it could also be science.

Rather than such a thing as limits and borders, we could make it a framework instead, for also those things we could also be making, for also setting,
except for not any Principles either, when also that of Axioms (or perhaps Theorems).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theorem

If rather living in a hope for just a couple of things, perhaps not any such thing as hopelessness either, when just only the opposite,
and in a similar way, perhaps no such thing as proving the Method of Proof itself, for only a couple of Facts, if still not any Proof.

If it rather could be the different thing, except not any opposite either, it could be the thrill sometimes expected, when just looking up in the sky,
just hoping for the unexpected, except for not taking anything for granted either.

Could you be making a guesswork just an assumption, perhaps still not any proven thing either, for just only Facts, when still only guessing.

But if rather bringing a thing forth, for also carrying out such a thing as well, it becomes almost like that of theory into practice, for just
Observational facts, when also possible Evidence.

Perhaps one thing is still knowing that a fly could still fly, except for not any intelligence coming along, for perhaps a lack of mind,
but if perhaps rather making it "stupendous" for such a thing, we could also question nature for such a thing as well, except for still only a couple of Facts.

The priest could still be presenting only a couple of facts, except for only the regular things still happening, and also being accustomed to,
like that of the process of death, for also life itself, when it could be at least happiness and joy for the latter, if still not the first one.

The translate still only makes it "fool" here, for yet the other thing, except not any daring either, because if still rather "Tears in the rain",
also that of life itself, for what we could be making of it, including those processes responsible for life.

But if rather questioning alien intelligences instead, we are also questioning possible likelihood as well, except for not making it any Certainty either,
for just only a Principle.

Perhaps still no such thing as skeptic for also a debunker as well, and also a believer as well, when perhaps only a single hand,
because there should still be one thing for just another, except for still likelihood meaning only Probability, for those chances we sometimes could get,
except not any Facts we sometimes could be making out either.

If a left hand could still be only those things we could see, also the right hand for those things we could sometimes prove, except not any direct link either.

Making it rather the UFO phenomenon a possible fact, rather than a question being asked, it becomes that of making Plausibility a possible Fact as well,
in that it could be just be proven.

If for some reason Intelligence should be telling about only levels of such, for that of Probability, or perhaps even Logic, it could be that of expecting such a thing,
only because an answer could be given, and also proven as well.

Did I ever hear a word about such a thing as UFO's being a proven Fact, for rather just a phenomenon instead?

Is next such a thing as Logic and Probability parts of nature, for only such a thing as Proof, except for not any reason of thinking what perhaps could be behind,
we could still make it that of a Creator instead, for only such a thing it perhaps might be.

Still only such a thing as thrill and excitement instead, for that of a nightly experience, if not any show, and you could be at least witness to a meteor in the sky,
if perhaps not falling to the ground either.

If rather a witness to the unexpected instead, for also an unexplained event, one thing is still taking the whole thing for granted, for just only event,
except for still proving the reason behind, for that of Reason itself.

Perhaps we are able to define certain levels of Intelligence, for only Intelligence itself, except not any Conscience either, for what it also could perhaps be.

The hypothetical travel through space, for only a ship, or spacecraft for such, is perhaps still not any meaning for that of the Universe itself,
or even making it aliens, for only that of creatures for such, when still only making it a couple of Laws for a couple of things, when perhaps only nature.

Any higher levels of Intelligence, and you could end up with a couple of spirits as well, for only possible angels, except not any beverage, for only just liquid contents.

If rather still assuming, we also could be assuming likelihood as well, except for still only questioning, for that of a couple of Facts.

But if rather such a thing as "Out of your mind" instead, for only such an experience, are you still only questioning a couple of things for just only Facts,
or could you rather be able to make it a certain Fact, for only just proving?

Becomes the same thing here, namely Fact, except for not any Certainty either, but where next to go, when making it Certainty, for only Fact,
when also that of Proof?

Making it just a phenomenon for a couple of things, and also you could assume such a thing as well, except not any directly, or specifically proven either.

At least Einstein could be making it time for a couple of things, and here perhaps not any "Out of your mind" either, for rather a Concept of space,
which should rather mean a reality, except for still only a couple of guesses.

Only having two legs of standing, and I should also be balancing as well, for only that of having senses, for just not any falling.

Because here still adhering to the Laws of motion, for just not any freefalling either, when next only to the ground, except for any Laws making it possible to
just fly through space and time instead, for only the notion of time.

Perhaps the written Laws of nature, could be the Force of gravity itself, except for not anything else possible either, which could be still that of travel through space and time.

Here that of the three-dimensional world, for still only space itself, using Equations, for next also Laws as well, except for not any notion of time either, making such travel possible.

Is it that of gravity which next could also bend space in sometimes a visible way, except for also that of bending possibly time as well, for only that of a curvature,
and it ends up being a space-time curvature for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

Next almost forgetting the subject of aliens here, for only lights themselves, if not any darkness either.

Perhaps the written Laws of nature, could also be that of Conscience as well, for only the butterfly Effect for such, if not any Religion either,
when possibly such a thing as Stairways to Heaven as well, for just only that of Religion.

Really the unknown could be still that of God here, for just only a Creator itself, except for not any Creation we still could think and make of it, and also touch.

Provability could be still resting on a fundament, for only such a way of thinking, except not any believing either, but seeing could still be just only believing,
for next only your eyes for such a thing.

Are we assuming it a certain way for that of Creation, except for still not making it science for the whole thing, and next also think that it also should be proven?

It still could be Order out of Chaos for a couple of things, except for getting it here, that this perhaps should not necessarily mean any Proof itself.

But if rather still one thing for next another, it becomes that of versus as well, except for still a thing perhaps different as well, for the thing still needed to be proven.

As an example, a complement is perhaps not always telling a nice thing about someone, but rather a One's complement, telling about at least Arithmetic here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ones%27_complement

Making it just unary, for perhaps rather negative instead, and perhaps not any opposite either, for just inverse, at least not for any Logic.

But next any "false" guess about a thought, or imagined way, for that of any Stairways to Heaven, is perhaps not resting on any such thing as Arithmetic either,
for only infinity, when perhaps rather Logic instead, for perhaps the slightly better, except for not any Implication, for an explanation either.

Ending up still only trying, for a couple of Facts, and we could end up thinking that there could be perhaps aliens around, except not any believing either.

Why not just Logic above instead, for only just 0, or 1, because we could end up making it 01111111, for just only 127, like also 11111111, for the similar 255?

Is Creation still a thing perhaps meant to be, for just implying, except for not any Order out of Chaos, which also could be similar, or corresponding Laws?

Or could it still be only Creation myth instead, for that of telling a possible story about Religion, for which things possibly became made?

Again, the middle of the day thing being experienced here, for also the mentioned ears as well, but Creation myth is perhaps not about any Fact,
for also reality, but still only a Myth.

Only the small difference of making it Logic here, for rather Arithmetic, and perhaps no reason of making it Order out of Chaos either,
for only that of Arithmetic versus Equations instead.

Here it becomes the cut off sentence as well, except for rather the point being noticed, that Logic could also be that of amputated facts as well,
for only a comparison with Arithmetic instead, but still as much important.

Just on the spot, any Ambiguity should not be any true versus false, for only inverse, or negative, like also 0 versus 1,
but if still 0 or 1 versus 255, perhaps still a different thing, only because it should be Arithmetic.

But rather making it a guessed fact, for also a way of life, for only reality instead, in that we could be questioning numbers for that of science,
by also making it a couple of Facts, except for not making it any Logic instead, for rather questioning that of Creation instead.

Making it such a thing as a linear scale, for that of nothing versus everything, and it becomes that of 0 versus infinity, for just only numbers.

Make rather a guess about a given Creation itself, for perhaps rather a Creator instead, next also behind as well, for only still guessing,
except for not only believing either, for just only Religion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistletoe

Only coming up in my mind right now, for just only an idea, except for still not another thought either, but if rather fortune could be still only just luck,
except for not any holy spirits at your side either, perhaps no such thing as any sacred either, which rather could be for a better moment of time.

Perhaps one "rather" too much in the previous, like also not making it large caps all the way either.

Here at the pages for that of communication methods, or principles, in that my service provider at least offers me a line,
but still a regulatory institution, or branch, telling which frequencies are allowed to be used, for sometimes not.

Under the leisure section, one dealing with wireless microphones for such, and here that amplitude modulation is not being allowed,
except for specifying at least the frequency range which could be used.

So, therefore at least a way of dealing with communication here, except for sometimes secrecy needed as well, and the way it is supposed to be done.

But if not wrong, we sometimes could make it the alien issue as well, by just thinking, if not any guessing either, for a thing perhaps not existing at all,
but rather ourselves, for sometimes only a mind going wrong, except for still the carpet of secrecy, being sometimes a hidden cover as well.

Speaking of Truth, I perhaps mentioned it already, so here no point of continuing on it right now.

Rather I was reminded about the roller-coaster here the other day, and that such a thing could be just for fun, at least when only a child,
except for those failures which could sometimes arise, and make for a short end of such given fun.

Is the ultimate thing here, just going into a loop, only because of speed for such a thing, except for still not falling straight down, just in the middle?

Or could it rather be the fact that you are just weightless, when upside down in such a slope, for next also arc as well, and still at the bottom side?

Even modern cars are having pedals for both throttle and clutch, as well as also breaks, if not any gear stick, for adjusting any speed,
but if rather nature for such a thing, where do we find any "Command and control" for such a thing, except for the Laws of gravity themselves?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_reference

Here in fact two different articles, for perhaps also subjects as well, except for not making it any stupidity out of some Observational facts either,
only because of perhaps rather Logic instead, except for not any way of just thinking.

Make it the way from a guess, for perhaps also an assumption as well, and you could still end up with slightly more than just Belief,
when actually more of Evidence, and if perhaps still such a thing, also that of Facts as well.

Really it translates into failure, for sometimes bankruptcy as well, when something only goes wrong, and it sometimes breaks, except for still not any
"Fallacy" either, for just only principles of nature, where it still could go wrong.

Are we next not daring, for perhaps not resisting either, when we could end up perhaps believing in a naked body lying on a table,
for also an autopsy being carried out, if not any dissection either?

If perhaps so, we could make it perhaps Belief into a given purpose, except not given Facts instead, and next not any pretty either, for just only looks.

Either it becomes that of science your way, for perhaps rather mine, except for still not any "so it goes" either, for a couple of things,
except for still only leaving it with a guess for perhaps only nature.

One thing is still that of the physical properties of nature, for also elementary particles, and also Laws, but if 01111111 or 11111111 should still mean more than just 0, or 1,
for that of bitwise, it could still be that of true and false for the latter, and next only Logic, while still only numbers for the first one.

Those things we could be making Trilobites, perhaps were still things made of flesh and blood, for also Carbon as well, being only a substance,
except for still also the atoms and molecules as well, for just also the same thing.

Is time next forever, because it could also be forever, or is rather such a thing as Eternity only a subject for Religion, for next only Belief versus Faith?

If still at the top of the roller-coaster, and next becoming stuck, one way of exiting, is perhaps inching both forwards and backwards, until back at the starting point,
except for not any waiting time, for also an endless wait, when it perhaps is not going to succeed at all.

The Laws of gravity could still be telling about a possible freefall, except not any warped space, for also curved as well, because if only an elevator here,
for also a lift, it could be that of pushing the knob, for just entering a floor, except not any smooth stop, for only that of ceasing running up or down.

Any fraction of time, and next also the Planck constant as well, except for only the physical Laws telling about a possible freefall,
and if perhaps still so, are you supposed to be falling, when getting trapped inside a Black Hole?

The Logic we could be making of any such thing as betterment, is perhaps not the thing we could make it either, for just only Logic itself,
except for only an assumption, for only a guess, while still only Logic.

Any Evidence, for also a possible Fact, and next it becomes that of Truth, because it also could be possible to prove, except for not any "Reveal yourself" either,
for only such Proof.

We know it could sometimes be just hard for a couple of things, including a lesson as well, but also that it could be a lesson learnt.

Make it still only you and me, for only that of presence, if not any Existence either, and still only the human factor, except not any Probabilistic issue,
for just only guesswork either, when still only nature.

Any possible Belief you might have, and still perhaps only Religion for such, except for not any assumption, for also guess, when it still could end up being the Logical answer.

Perhaps both a Frame of Reference, for also the Equivalence principle as well, could be telling about nature, like also a Tacit assumption as well,
except for only the difference between classical mechanics here, for rather Equations instead, when also that of Logic as well.

Is life next still a product of Evolution only, or could it be the physical Laws responsible for Quantum mechanics instead?

As soon as it becomes complexity, no such thing as just forgiving, for being any simple or easy, but if still perhaps the physical Laws,
also the notion of time, for making it a four-dimensional space.

So, while Einstein was perhaps not any fond of Quantum mechanics, next also for starters as well, and next where to begin.

We could perhaps end up still not believing, for rather the Method of Proof instead, when that of Jesus feeding the hungry in the desert,
but could you rather make it any such Belief a Method itself, except not any way of just believing, when perhaps still only nature?

It could sometimes be just only a square inside, or within a circle, but next not any five square, for just only a pentagon either,
and here it becomes a reminder of the figure standing naked in front, for only that of stretched out hands.

Because here it still could be that of lights versus also darkness, except for not any such thing as proving any disguise, for also hiding in the shadows.

Only that of Evidence itself, should also be that of revealing as well, for only "Reveal yourself", except for the sad fact, that we still could only make it Jesus here,
for next also God as well, except for still not any believing either.

Assuming Laws, also Proof as well, by just making it also Facts as well, but if still rather that of Evidence, for only that of Observational facts,
we next could also think that we perhaps are not alone in space, for only that of other civilizations also around.

But if rather still only Creation itself, we could also know it for just Fact as well, because it should also be for real, except not any trusted either.

Except for still also Our Father, for also Lord's Prayer as well, where one sentence is suggested to imply that we should be caring for his name as well,
except for also his means at disposal, for only making a couple of things true.

Any false, for just only Logic, and it could be that of Doubt as well, except for not any Falsification either, when still only that of means,
when next still not any "Reveal yourself" either.

So, except for not any multiverses either, for also Dark Matter and Dark Energy as well, we are not supposed to be any "believers" for just only the opposite either,
meaning that of Truth, for just only given Proof.

Even Chaplin could be making it Modern Times, except for still not any hard times, for just only a lesson for such, but if Creation is perhaps meant for a purpose,
is Proof still needed, when perhaps still only part of such a thing itself?

Perhaps we still could just only quantify a little, except for perhaps not infinity just everything either, when also the notion of time, for that of just space.

Or perhaps rather the Fact that there should be no need of doubting any Logic either, for the opposite, when also that of Truth, for still only an answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence

Any "Faceless coward", for just only words coming from a president, and next perhaps not any Fallacies either, when rather shortcomings of nature,
except for not any give and take, for also versus, when also one thing could next mean the other as well, for both that of a grave, if not any time travel either.

The fallen enemy, being thrown in front of the Emperor, only because you could be the hunter responsible for such a catch, is perhaps a victory for such,
except for still not questioning any nature for that of answers, when still that of Doubt versus given Truth.

But next, any Logic for just seeing such a thing, and next also telling, should be quite visible as well, for also quite evident as well.

Are such a thing as Doubt and Truth, for also versus as well, also the opposite, for also inverse, if still not any negation either, for just only unary?

Existence could still be making for life itself, except not any phrase by my father, for such a thing, but also that Creation should be taken for granted as well,
for only that of being just proven.

Any Religion of it perhaps, and next also lost at sea as well, except for sometimes the science you could be making of it, by just seeing.

Perhaps being only just able to prove a couple of things, and we could also make it Creation as well, for only that of meaning, except for not any intended purpose,
when perhaps rather a Creator for such instead, and possibly behind.

Therefore, still that of provability, for only a couple of given Facts, except for not any ultimate answer either, for only that of seeking Proof to a couple of questions.

Could you next make it any Aura, for perhaps also responsible for your soul, except for still only a static field?

If Logic is still only a field of Mathematics, perhaps not any direct part of nature either, for that of a process, when rather Fundamental Laws of physics instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminescence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognition

Here the leaves of a tree, for only that of green, except not the other article here as well, but except for still only biological process responsible for life,
for also chemistry as well, and also synthesis as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biochemistry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis

Ask me about a dream instead, for only that of Cognition, and except for perhaps not any Dreamland, still perhaps only a dream, for what you could be making it,
because only knowing that I am still only flesh and blood, perhaps no reason for making it anything else, for also other, when perhaps still also
an Existence within limits and borders, for also a way of reasoning as well.

But next, make it rather a scientific goal, for also achievement as well, and therefore I should also prove Dreamland as well, except for still only asking.

Could you still only Doubt for a couple of things, and perhaps no such thing as a believer either, for just only Religion, except for still that of proving for science.

Any blissful you sometimes could be, for only a sense of happiness and joy, does perhaps not hide the fact that infinity could be proven by not only Physics,
but also Mathematics, for just that of both disciplines, but next question the Mathematician, for that of the physical Laws he could make, for also come up with,
also the Physicist as well, for making the whole thing into context, for next also understandable.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(disambiguation)

Is Statistics next any boring, except for not any Probabilistic argument either, for only that of likelihood of intelligent life, except for still not any Proof itself?

Of course we could still end up just proving a couple of things, for just only a couple of Facts, except for still not making it any Truth, for only that of Certainty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_mechanics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation

The latter two from the first one here, and also that this becoming the second attempt or so, because here could ending up making it a bit of Philosophy as well,
except for still not eyes counting either.

Is it still a way of Dualistic principle, for also Method as well, by just making it waves for a couple of things, while also particles for next only Matter itself?

Except for perhaps rather thinking for such instead, in that a pure sinusoidal wave could still be for that of our purposes, except for not the approach perhaps thought of,
for just only making it a Dualistic nature for such a thing.

Any clarity here, for next this question, but if still that of energy also being that of waves as well, is not the electron supposed to be an elementary particle,
for only that of state, including negative for positive energy, for only that of charge, except for perhaps not any polarization either?

The chamber where droplets of water could be found, making it a fog, could be telling about splitting of whole atoms, for only that of fission,
except for not any fusion processes where the end product could still be elementary particles.

Look at those previous posts where that of nuclear fusion became explained, for only that of stars, except for not any elementary level,
for also bottom at the scale as well, for only the individual particles instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction

Here scroll down to the section Physics, and from only the more general subject of Magnetism, for also the more fluent one, about Plasma.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_equation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induction_plasma

Here more in detail for the second one, but also liking the first one as well, for being quite specific, because if still only a Prism, for making it colors out of white,
is the electron supposed to adhere to any specific Laws, only because it could be an elementary particle?

Really, I catch the point here for making it gravity one thing, for next time the other, except for also Laws of nature dealing with elementary particles as well,
for also their individual properties, but if rather back at Schrodinger once again, also that of Quantum mechanics, for where it becomes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_quantum_mechanics#Schrödinger_wave_equation

Adding the second half as well, for also part, in that I am not an expert here myself, but if just reading, Photons should be still that of light,
except for not the Force of gravity either.

Is the secret here that particles are still for the physical Laws also making up these, while that of energy itself, is still the thing out in the blue,
for only that of being still only waves?

If a particle is supposed to be having a dualistic nature, for also characteristics as well, where is the secret, or perhaps mystery in all of this?

Could it perhaps be the Force of gravity itself, for still not being explained, or is nature perhaps still the Four Fundamental Forces for such,
only because a particle could be having both mass and an electric charge?

Reading further down, any emission coming from that of radiation, could still be the Photoelectric effect for such, but if rather quantification instead,
could be that of making numbers out of Matter, when still only that of energy?

So, perhaps Thermodynamics instead, for only a hot apple, if not any boiling soup either, except not any Cold Fusion either, for that matter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics

If electrons are still part of atoms, for also belonging to such, their energy states, for that of levels, is due to the fact that the electrons could be jumping the
shells, for also orbits, for only that of orbiting the nucleus, and it becomes levels of energy, for only that of state, except not any motion.

Except any friction, still that of kinetic energy, for also the other one always missing, but if rather a Photon, for perhaps not a single atom of Hydrogen either,
where is the energy signature here, for only that of heat, or perhaps radiation instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy

Still relativistic a couple of times, for only time just spinning, but also that of Physics as well, for only making it the Force of gravity for the thing perhaps being wished for.

Really it could be thought of the mid-week fun of sorts, for perhaps having the previous thread with me for some time,
and also letting it gradually sink in, for that of contents.

Hide and seek, and next the same thing once again, for only ideas and guesses, when perhaps also even more as well.

Making a guess, for just an idea, perhaps the whole thing should be known right now, except for those things we still could think could be science.

Therefore I was wondering a little about the possible alternative, for still only speculating for next science, when also that of an idea,
except for the thing of still proving a Fact, for only the thing it perhaps could be.

Guess it could be that of fun as well, for only strolling on the Moon at times, but still sensing here that those things we still could be making only wild guesses,
could still need that of the Method of Proof, for just problem solving.

Could I be left with sometimes questions going in one ear, for that of answers going out the other, or could it still be only questions all the time?

At best, making up for one thing, should be that of just assumed fact for such a thing, except for still no any definitive Proof either.

Rather than the Method of Proof itself, we are out for that of a purpose here, namely the question whether we are alone in space, for perhaps more of other Intelligences as well,
and only by taking a couple of stories for what they could be, perhaps not any given, for just granted either, except for still perhaps no Skeptics needed either.

If still only tools for science for next also that of given or intended use, it could be yes, for only such an answer given.

Just by thinking, only such a guess could be making for also an assumption as well, and by just doing so, we could end up with a couple of Facts as well, for only the answer we could be wishing for.

The opposite thing of not being able to prove, is perhaps also a thing being encountered at times, but rather than proving, it becomes that of dismissing instead,
for still a couple of Facts only.

But if still perhaps only a bit of fun, it could also be that of Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, for next only a show.

Either it becomes only the British Museum for such a thing, or they could also call it the National Broadcasting Association, if not any rifles either,
but if perhaps two different things here, for also on my mind, it could be that of colors and shapes for just nature, except not any perfect skull either,
while also that of spinning around a little, for perhaps not making it any Prism either.

Perhaps Statistics is not always only a tool for that of measuring, but rather the way a thing could be made of just itself, for only intrinsic, versus sometimes complexity as well,
because the complex function could still be such Statistics, except for not any complexity we could be making of nature itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative

Next that we also know that scientists are not always laughing about their own subject either, except for perhaps Atheists only laughing at Religion,
but except for still sometimes a blunder, the Forces of nature could still be that of Matter, when next still only radiation, for that of energy,
and still we could make it physical Laws for both one thing, like also the other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

I guess it could be still the three part subject here, for that of Matter versus Energy, except still not any time either, but if sometimes only red eyes in the morning,
just wondering what Einstein was perhaps asking about, for also the same as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_theory

Even at just only past 12 AM in the morning, or perhaps afternoon, and still at least such a thing popping up, for just only an idea.

One thing is perhaps still only making it colors for that of wonders of nature, except not any Miracles, but here still that of Proof for such a thing,
except for the other thing which science could perhaps tell.

So, if perhaps more to the point, which Forces of nature are responsible for such a thing as warping of space, for perhaps only gravity, except not any time travel possible,
because here back at Wave mechanics, for only the starting point, and next what we could make of just waves for that of patterns, while still not any droplets in the ocean either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscillation

Should it be still only Classical mechanics here, except not any Hammer and Feather, for just only an experiment, but for some reason I could make it that of just spinning around,
for only a couple of questions instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave

Here perhaps not any droplets in the ocean, but rather surface waves in water showing water ripples, and except for still not any inertia, in which way could you make it the forces being
responsible for traveling through space and time?

Need scrolling down to the section General features here, before finishing up the whole thing.

Look closer at it, and Einstein makes it four-dimensional space here, by only the notion of time for being added, but still both space and time for next both,
except not any single context either.

Here the weekend shopping still ahead, for also a bit slow running computer in the middle of the day, but somewhere around, you may find that of a Dualistic principle,
when also a Method for such, when next thinking about nature, for perhaps still only Matter versus Energy, except not any waves either.

Rather than perhaps not any colors either, more just of thinking the way matter could be working, for also function, except for still not any interaction either.

If still assuming that nature is still not any "slippery slope" either, for just only complexity, always the other thing which could be added as a subject,
except for still not any travel through time and space, for only that of a subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tensor

Here again only Equations for that of Mathematics, except perhaps not any ripples in time either, for still only the surface of water, but if back at Photons once again,
also notice that it does not interact with the Strong nuclear force here, and perhaps the other particle for this should be asked for.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertia

If assuming that time could still be the other part of it, for also second, is this only because of the waveform characteristic of elementary particles,
we rather could be making energy instead?

Any standstill, for just holding a speech, and you could still weigh in at 80 kg, except for not any free fall of yours either, perhaps adding energy to only the motion of falling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_energy

But already mentioning the difficulty for remembering the other name for the subject, for also part, if perhaps not any static energy either.

The electron could still be an elementary particle, for only negative charge for that of energy, but next any Prism needed either, like that of both fission and fusion.

Personally I do not like this mix-up, for also confusion, because here it should be that of subatomic level, for only elementary particles.

Except for still not any stupidity for any dark cat crossing the road, like also infinity making it sometimes believers as well, the singularity of a Black Hole
should rather be telling about the Force of gravity itself, except not any particles which it could represent.

Therefore, energy could still be telling about gravity, for also the mass it could represent, except for not any time absent either, for only a standstill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark

Perhaps Einstein could still be proud, except for only knowing the difference between Classical mechanics and General Relativity, for only the notion of time,
but for some reason, that of Entropy became that of Thermodynamics at first, except for not the Ambiguation page, where it could become lost for that of clarity.

Leaving it off there, for that of the shopping, because here getting where I almost wanted, for also the remaining part as well.

One of the beers from the double six pack for the weekend, sprang a big leak, and using a spoon, together with a plate, where perhaps rather a dish instead,
for collecting the contents.

At least a funny start of the weekend, for also my ears as well, because here the thing not drying up, for only cold ears instead.

Should that sink in, except for still only leak, and next life itself, for only reading previous contents, gets a reminder of,
for also a thought, except for not any such thing as just only a lifeboat when running aground with a ship,
for rather that of death and destruction itself.

Guess we still could make a laugh of some people, except not any Atheists for any Religion, like still also versus as well.

We know that stupidity could still kill the cat, except for not any black one such running across the road either.

But rather that the thing we could still be asking about, for also question, could still be that of science, for only a subject.

Is the end of the road, still that of standing on the surface of an object, for next also a circle, if not the globe for just the Earth you could be living on?

Like the stirrup you could just use to climb a horse, for perhaps not any enter either, next no such thing as the other side either, for just only falling.

Trying to catch up here, I am quite into the fact, for also concerned as well, for just making it the scientific approach here to a couple of things,
when still only guessing, for that of details, or possible answers.

Is science just cheap, for sometimes also forgiving as well, in that it not necessarily should rely on the Method of Proof, but rather the thing we could see,
and next observe?

Those things we sometimes could be making just a "pleasure dome", for only a Circus, if not anything else, is perhaps not any such thing as sorrow being felt,
for only losing a close friend, because here I could make it a green beret for sometimes a helmet as well, for still not any pink, for just only a flower.

Make it two different buns, for also bowls as well, and perhaps not any ashtray either, but if having 100 dollars in just dimes, you get the same number of each,
and still you could make it even, for some 50 dimes in each bowl.

Here that of an even distribution, which should also be fair, because any recipient should be able to receive the same amount, for only such a thing.

But if rather making it different conditions for that of nature, you rather could be making it an Aspect instead, for only that of Certainty.

The sometimes wild nature around, for also being present, could be that of turmoil and chaos, except for still making a guess for only Order versus Chaos.

Is Logic next for any given or intended purpose, when only nature is still concerned, or is it rather that of an guess, for also an assumption, if not any opposite order?

If not mentioned before, that of Order and Chaos should still be an important subject, except for also those things just meant, for also imply.

Make it 2/3 for just 1 as a whole, and the remaining part, for that of 1/3, becomes the rest, for still only a part, but should it not be the fact that
Order could perhaps be more of significance, for only meaning such a thing, except for not any Chaos for any less, except for still not any Logic?

So, or therefore, Order should still be that of Logic, except for not anything you could quantize, by making it only numbers instead, while still that of Chaos,
for randomness.

Like still the green helmet, for also pink shirt, any given trust, for just only trust me, if perhaps not any senses either, for only a free or given will (testimony),
any Truth you could be making of a thing, should be that of Logic as well, for only making a similar thing true.

Any hidden meaning for next only a song, and perhaps not any Burl Ives either, for just only "This is your life", but next any notion of death, for also life,
perhaps is not meant any God, or even Devil, for only that of meaning, except for still only a nature we try to understand.

Is Creation next meant for only that of physical Laws, as well as also Equations, or could you also make it Heaven and Hell, for only such a thing granted?

Almost forgetting the elementary particles here, for also ideas and speculation sometimes ending up with actual Fact, for also Proof, when only that of
results and achievements, for only that of a significant importance.

Why doubt a possible Creator, for also believe as well, if perhaps both within the context of just Logic, for only that of a meaning?

Any "Faceless coward" for a couple of things, and it could be still only a nature you could be left to speculate about, except not any Truth,
for still the thing you could be able to prove.

Any tribulation or joy, for perhaps not any sense of luck instead, and still that of a pleasure dome for such, for only the pink flower,
but if rather counting to three, for just not any light year either, could you make it any such thing as time travelers (or a time traveler),
when still only the vast distances of space, except not any claim you could also be making a Proof, for only an Observational fact?

It could end up being the unobtainable, for also unachievable as well, except for still not any Idiocy, for perhaps not telling any "true",
for just only an answer either.

The open question could still be making the "Man in the Street" still the idiot he could perhaps be, except for those answers being asked,
which should rather be about a given Truth.

Makes me think of the toolbox here, where we could make it a couple of attributes, for only elements or objects, except for still not any whole,
for perhaps still only Truth, for only that of an answer.

Just only 0 OR 1 for just Logic, and it should be 1 for that of the answer, meaning just true, except not any 0 AND 1 instead, for rather false.

If we know that an answer for also a solution could be resting on such a fact as a Proof, also that it should be true as well, except for still not the above.

But if Logic is still about provability, we could also end up with just wrong being the final answer, because it also could be just false.

Could nature be hiding any secrets, for only meant of a discovery for such, except for still not any tribulation and joy, for a sense of luck,
when you were able to find, or come up with the answer?

Any trap for also a trap door, and perhaps not any pitfall, for that of an animal trapping either, for perhaps such a thing being interpreted.

If rather such a thing as absurdity, for next also weird, it could still be a couple of Facts, for only observed such, when perhaps still not any Evidence either.

Leave it off, for still perhaps only shopping, and we could end up still believing in a couple of things for just science, except for still not any proving.

But rather still only the toolbox instead, except not any fine mechanics either, for only tuned, when perhaps rather making it nature for that of a given purpose,
except for still only idiots of ourselves, for just the Man in the Street.

Any life for next any sacred, and also that of leaving such a thing as Religion alone as well, for only that of science instead, because here that of Biology,
for also Genealogy as well, when still only that of life processes, for only such a thing as living.

Next that of juxtaposition for a couple of things, except not any direct opposite either, when perhaps living like Eskimos, could still be a possibility,
except for not any life in between the clouds either, for only that of weightlessness.

Rationality could end up being a way of Logic for just thinking that one thing should be possible, except not the other, for also that of such a way of life.

The "is" for also that of "is not", is perhaps not any smile either, but rather the thing we could be taking granted, for just being possible.

But rather perhaps ending up with the question of what if meant with that of "Truth", when still only Proof for such a thing.

Prove such a thing as angels, and why not make it Religion instead, except for still the science we could use, for only that of given truths?

Any cube of ice, for also that of a droplet of water, and still both things possible, except for any Truth proving just the similar,
but next doubting a story, for only that of given, or actual facts, is perhaps not possible either.

We could end up in vain, for just only striving, when next such a thing as facing any alien, for also the Intelligence it could also be.

If still only the face in the mirror, perhaps only yourself, except for not any alien being, when it also could be that of a Civilization for such,
and next still only in disguise.

We both know, for also see as well, that nature could always be the winner, for only the things it could represent, except for still only made of.

Doubting any nature, for that of a concept, and you still could make it only Belief for a couple of things, except for still only nature, for that of an answer.

Meaning here the same as above, for only still that of 0 AND 1 for only false, except for not the answer itself.

If life is still not any sacred, next perhaps not any secret either, for only a way of proving such a thing, except not any mirror either,
so where is any tribulation and joy here, except for the secret which could be still hidden?

Perhaps the story for that of any Miracles, still needs to be dug up here, for that of a closer examination.