If we still could perhaps agree on a couple of issues, also such a thing as Hysteria, when it rather could be only Nostalgy.

But rather simplify things a little, and make it computerized science, for also a bit of numbers, and also Physics as well.

If both a number, as well as an equation, should make it also an answer as well, also an answer to a couple of questions still left to be answered.

The lack of a possible meaning, should not be no meaning at all either, except for sometimes Comprehension, when it also could be that of an Allegory as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegory

If Creation could sometimes be "sing a song", for next also crying a little as well, at least we could know the meaning of it, except for not the meaning of the
meaningless thing either, when it also could be a bit of nonsense.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor

Here that of a powder keg, by means of my grandfather, when it rather could be a mentioning of the Big Bang, when next rather everything came into existence.

But next also supposedly for both good and bad as well, because it also could be both reason, and meaning.

Therefore perhaps also a reason as well, including a good one, for that of giving a mentioning of both good days, and also bad days,
except for perhaps with reference to science, and not any Politics either.

But rather more the fact that nature could be following its own course, except for not any human intervention either, which could be altering its course.

You perhaps are not able to make it such a thing as events, any tick of a clock either, only because things are constantly changing, sometimes for the better,
and sometimes for the worse.

If still left with another alternative, also an option as well, for next not any suggestion, which also could imply as well, for only that of a statement,
if not any implication.

Only the fact that one thing sometimes could hold against another, is that of making it Proof as well, and next still one thing with respect to another.

Even Dr. Stephen M. Greer could make it such a thing for a picture being held up, for that of a human construct, for also that of a production,
except for not making it any alien construction for such a thing, for also a similar manufacturing.

But rather that he makes it that of sometimes a disguise for such a thing, in order to next pretend ourselves to be just aliens, only for that of the sake of such a thing,
except for perhaps still not the real thing either, which could rather be something else.

Except for perhaps still not any Probability either, we sometimes could make it rather cheating, when it also could be Perception.

Anyway, and next also anyhow as well, for still pretending a couple of things to be, only because they also could be for such a thing as well,
except for still not any Comprehension either.

Wishful thinking perhaps, but why make a stealth plane, when only coming up with a space shuttle, for such a thing as flying in space?

My guess is that may not make it any wish only, for a couple of UFO's to exist, but rather that you could assume their existence, or presence,
only because of a readily knowledge of nature.

One reason the old pocket calculator could be still working, is only because of 0, for next also zero, or nothing.

If rather still only quantizing the world, for also a bit of quantifying, we still could make it a couple of numbers, of course, except for still not any Comprehension either,
for that of a similar Creation, when it rather could be "quantification".

If rather the moment of Creation also became "earlier on", for also "with respect to", perhaps no such thing either, for that of perhaps "In the beginning".

But if rather Credibility as the subject, next also for a purpose as well, if not any good meaning either, and supposedly we could also believe as well.

At least these could become the word of mine, this time.

Apparently stacking up a little here, for what I could have to say, but also that I am using Notepad for a little bit of wording, and here "File" at top left,
is missing an "e" in my native language, and also correctly so.

But more that with a 23 inch monitor (if not wrong), it gets cramped at top left, for the whole menu,
and each time when clicking on the File menu, for that of saving a file, it jumps to the Edit menu besides.

If a bit more of spacing could be offered, this little thing could be avoided, for that of the menu, and here asking Microsoft for a fix.

Better should read 23-inch monitor in the previous, because looking better so.

But also that I am too late for the shop today, so will have to do it tomorrow instead.

My guess is that you are not familiar with the subproject status pages at PrimeGrid, except for sometimes delight at even finding something.

Except for still also the theme, when it could be still that of sitting on a bench, next in a church, only listening to a couple of phrases, for next also preaching,
where people being part of, or perhaps belonging to the UFO community, could be sometimes celebrating their acknowledgment of the possible "sublime",
if perhaps not any Eternity either, when it rather could be that of aliens or extraterrestrials.

Except for perhaps still being allowed, of course, but also the Scientific Method which should be coming along, next together with also Proof as well,
for that of sometimes a "Belief" in only such a thing that we perhaps are not alone, but rather only part of whole community, for also a possible membership as well.

Possibly no such thing as any "Hippocrisy" either, except for still only the bench in the church for that of sitting, because this should not be any place for those
who could be Atheists, or Agnostics.

Presumably it still could be sometimes Comprehension when it comes to such things as stars and galaxies in the sky, but if rather still about the mind only,
it sometimes could go haywire, if not any runaway, or wild either.

You probably know that Jesus was the one who could be healing people, but only in a sense of Religion and Belief, except for perhaps not any science either.

But still also such a thing as glory, extol, or aggrandizement, for the subject of ufology, by making it also a "presumption", for next also the fact, that we may not be alone.

The scientist who could end up being not pleased, or satisfied with his work, would next chew his gum, for also teeth, in order to next continue, and supposedly so for
also the Moment of Truth.

Perhaps no such thing as an Apparition in the sky either, but also a reminder of "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", because here it became such an encounter between
humans and extraterrestrials, only because it could be in the cards for such a thing, and next also things unfolding, for also left to happen.

Is such a thing meant to be, for perhaps not to be either, only because of the Scientific Method, or perhaps only the Method of Proof?

Who made, or perhaps came up with the phrase "Never say never", for next also never such a thing again?

Again, stop is not the same as any start either, except for both a push of a button, and also twisting a knob, in order to turn off the water,
except for sometimes the opposite order.

If knowing that I could make it distilled water, for only pouring acid into water, next which one came first, except for the other thing which fell out again.

Really I hate to make a comparison here, but if adoring a close friend, for that of a possible relationship, it should not be the same as hating the same person either.

But if rather an adorable subject, for still such a close relationship, you possibly know what I mean.

Before checking, there was an old adventure in my heritage, with the name of "Bukken bruse", and here for that of getting water at the river.

Except for perhaps the water, next also the herd itself, for the way they could be moving ahead, for next also such a thing.

So, except for perhaps not any green marshes, or even the underground system making for a Lion, or Sphinx, for that of old Egypt,
we sometimes could be dreaming about a place for that of living, next also a different one than just Earth.

If Einstein still became the clerk meeting up in the office each day, also that of time travel which could be possible, in order to next go to other places.

This because making it a notion of both time and space, could make for such a thing possible, except for perhaps still not any Portal either, which could be telling about
yet another different existence.

Any such melody like "Down at the river", perhaps?

Supposedly, or most likely, sharing should not be the same as any "shedding" either, except for sometimes both a dull and dark moment for that of shadows,
except not "in the shadows", for also that of the lost or bygone soul either.

Such a thing as "Valley of the Shadows" could be the thing experienced, shortly before the moment of death, because it could be a reflection upon events during lifetime.

But also that it could be still that of waiting, next for the moment itself.

If perhaps still a sense of loss and sorrow and also bereavement or deprivation, for only that of losing a close relative, next also perhaps a dull day as well,
except for also perhaps knowing that your lost one went somewhere else, for which there perhaps is no explanation.

I mentioned before that both love and hate could be a thing coming with Creation itself, except for still not any Creator, for that of possible Existence.

Religion is supposedly our interface with God, where there could be no other rational explanation, including sometimes only scientific work or progress.

If such a word or phrase "In the beginning", next should also be a notion of time, also that everything came into existence, only because everything was created,
because of that of an initial start.

If not only time for such, next also everything for just anything else, in that both Matter and Energy became spontaneously created out from just nothing.

Sometimes Einstein could be making it "Fundamental flaws" for such work being carried out, and next also in progress, except for not any "Falling man" either,
which could be that of a fall, if not any slip of a tongue either, or even on ice.

This because such flaws rather should be about a way of thinking, for next also carrying out science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penetration_test

Only for that of the word itself, because here not finding a good example.

Except for perhaps not needing an ice pick either, when it rather could be "Show me the way", for such a thing, and next it could become that of Eternity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-reference

So why not just stick to the point for what you just have to say, and only make it science, when you next could also think it could be Religion,
except for still not making it any Frame of Reference either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_reference

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obligate

Here Biology for that of the latter, and next just passing by, except for not any living dead for that of any funeral either, when we also could make it such a thing for the Universe itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise

Still perhaps rather the "Garden of Eden" for such, except for not any detour, or side trip either, when it still could be a couple of flaws, for at least science.

If still not such a thing as any gods or angels either, you could perhaps "fiddle" your way a little, when next looking down the article.

Definitely no such thing as any excuse for that of any acid, next for science only, but rather a possible excuse for that of Religion, when still making it lack of Proof.

If we rather could still believe in the Method of Proof, only for how good it perhaps could be, also that of a similar Proof, for that of aliens, but apparently not so.

Except for still only looking up in the sky, for also the general thought, if not any view, or idea, that we still could be alone in space.

Except for not any microbes visiting us either, but rather a high rise back, for next also a developed civilization, which could be represented by that of a Type III civilization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnolia

Again, just passing by, for also a quite good sentence here for that of aliens which could be visiting us, and next also be highly evolved as well.

So, while perhaps nourish, for also nutrition, also sometimes a thing only in our heads, rather than a couple of things which perhaps could not be explained.

We probably could be still making it conditions for life, in order for such a thing being possible, except for still not life itself only,
for sometimes also building its own rockets and ships, for next setting sail into the unknown, for also new discoveries to be made.

If also such a thing as possibilities became part of a given Creation, also that success should be dependent on the fruit it may be able to carry along with it,
for that of once again widening the horizons, for those things which might be visible and next also able to see.

Except for still setting sail, also that of resting for a moment, if not ceasing to exist either, in that a short moment could bring success, while it also could be the final end,
for also a demise, because here not any laurel either, for the possible other thing as well.

Next sometimes hard to avoid, when also it could be a hard thing to miss as well, when next forgetting the meaning.

Except for still only a couple of broken promises, where you sometimes could make it science, while other times still only guessing.

Perhaps no such thing as any intelligence either, next for only nature, when still only black and white, for that of colors,
and you rather could be opening your mouth, for just saying a couple of things, while the Method of Proof could perhaps be no such thing either,
in that we could always make out the difference.

Could we perhaps make it still Biology only, next for ourselves, when it also could be that of evolution, which could be only a natural occurrence?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypochondriasis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypochondrium

Here the more specialized word for this as well, which I do not have right now.

Supposedly not Gordon for this either, except for still only a bit of hype and speculation, for that of any Type III civilizations, since this could also be on my mind.

If Credibility could still be that of thinking, except for not any "meant for a given purpose" either, by means of a possible Certification, always a reason to believe,
when it also could be that of warranted circumstances, next for a given thing, which could mean "Close Encounter", or the like.

Only defining it as a possible word, and you also know that there could be a possible witness to such an event, for next also a couple of things he or she perhaps saw.

But next that also a readily explainable phenomenon should not be the same as any unexplained either, except for still only ourselves for such a thing.

The reason why we sometimes could not make it an extraterrestrial craft, is only because of ourselves, because of similar merits, or accomplishments by such things as
the Flying Wing, or rather Stealth aircraft, for a perhaps better comparison.

If rather choosing to make it one thing for next another, it could still be that of ourselves for such a thing, for both that of Perception, if not any Comprehension either.

Could you make it still one stone atop another, for next also a bit of throwing, except for not any insults, for also bad words, when it sometimes could be rather science?

Again, I sometimes could wish you a Merry Christmas, if not any "Wish you were here", either for next also cross-referencing, rather than just referencing,
in order to bring it all together, next in one single piece.

Or perhaps rather the wrong discussion, for next also not the correct subject as well, in that intelligent civilizations could be thought of as leaves on a tree,
except for not such a thing either, when it rather could be that of a given Comprehension, where it could suffice to only making it physical Laws.

Or perhaps still only the Universe for such a thing, where a fundament of nonsense, could be making for a magnificent story at the end,
only because of Creation meant for an intended purpose.

Could you sometimes make it a "Short story", except for sometimes the longer one as well, which could be telling the rest of the story?

Why not rather throw it out in the sand, if not dark either, for just lack of evidence, when it also could be a similar Proof?

Or is perhaps winning the gold medal still about such a pedestal, when also such a thing as glory, extol, or even excitement, could be part of it all?

Making it rather the market, or perhaps Economy, for such a thing, and you could be having both an upward and also downward trend,
if not any such thing as speculation either, which could be making for events sometimes taking place in advance, or perhaps ahead of schedule.

Or perhaps "Love me do", by Beatles here, except for not having the meaning either.

A prime number finder, for also prime finder, could be lucky, if not feeling any lucky, except for still only the find itself,
but next what is meant by a Type III civilization, for also its part, as well as meaning, for next also possible universal thinking as well?

If perhaps an IQ of 200, for that of myself, next also an aspiring scientist as well, except for not any measure for that of any technology either.

Make it rather Conscience, and perhaps not any "brilliant" either, except for sometimes only a Belief on your own, for that of only such a thing itself.

If not any strong drink, for any strong acid either, where next to go, for that of sometimes being restless, except for still not any Stairways to Heaven either,
for that of sometimes an end of a Journey as well.

If dawn could still be that of rise of humans, for next also rise of the sun in the morning, also that of sunset, for that of the waning sun in the late evening,
like both wading and waning, as usual, except not any afterglow either.

Except for perhaps not any demise of civilizations either, which could sometimes mean end of hostilities, if not end of an era either, for next another dawn,
for also a similar Creation, next for yet another moment to be passing by.

Logging off, because what I have, should better suffice right now, because as you may well know, I am thinking about that of truth for that of science,
except for not necessarily making it Proof all the time either.

Also losing at least four buffers for that of posting, but next anyway.

Except for with my potato chips and beer right now, and could be doing so a little while more.

In the old classroom, also the wooden benches for that of pupils sitting at except for not the chair either.

Lean forward on the table, and you next could also pretend to be dead, except for still not any numbers either, when possibly it could rather be acid in water,
if still not any Einstein either, for that of believing in a couple of things, except for still not only the Method of Proof.

If rather Dawn of the morning, like also early morning, it could be the Mastodon stuck in a swamp for such a thing, except for four legs with an elephant,
which suddenly made for an association with that of a dinosaur, except for still only a mammal for such, because of evolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephant

Could we make it an table of sorts for that of levels of intelligence, when it next could be only an Intelligent Quotient (IQ) for such,
except for me pretending to be such a thing once again, for next also "or", when we still could make it both fools and geniuses here?

Again, in the mood right now, so perhaps better, for also right, if not any bad either, for next also wrong.

Should such a thing as Conscience be associated with a state of mind, except for perhaps not any reflection upon such either?

If only such a thing as Measurability, for a couple of things, next we know that it was also present, or could be there, and was moving from place to place,
in also a given direction.

Better a sting from a wasp, rather than a Stingray, except for also being susceptible to ones surroundings, except for not any prone either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingray

Always that of "no such thing" being heard, except for not even sometimes belief as well, when it rather could be lack of Proof, sometimes.

If still also that of "One thing, for next also another", we possibly could know that part of the story as well.

"Did it happen", and next only look at the Dinosaurs, for also their evolution, if not any demise either, for at least such animals once existing,
except for not a way of getting the hands on an elusive phenomenon either, for next only ourselves.

Is the reason you could speak, the fork for such a thing, and next in your throat, for that of speaking?

Next any lines which could be drawn in parallell, possibly more above each other, rather than side by side?

Each such line next makes for a marker for that of a successive period, which sometimes could mean time.

If the Stone Age lasted a couple of Millennia, if perhaps more, and next also the known time scale, for that of evolved humans,
next place each scale directly above each other, for that of 100 making up the Stone Age, and perhaps 10,000, for that of modern humans.

Except for perhaps rather an evolutionary branch for that of a couple of animals, starting with an ancestor being common for all of these.

If for some reason we could make a story more true than another, for next also facts, we could also believe in such a story, except for sometimes also events happening.

Sometimes perhaps nonsense only, for also meaningless, except for also a couple of things unfolding as well, for that of a couple of events.

Next, make it only Earth, for that of ourselves, except for perhaps no visitor either, next on behalf of an intelligent civilization, other than our own.

Do you next put your hands on the table, for next also flat, or could it rather be the opposite way, for also a couple of fingerprints visible?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

Really a nice subject for what we could be doing here, except for still not any "fools and horses" either.

Better perhaps making it "winners and losers" for such a thing, except for still perhaps not a game either.

But rather that one of the most fundamental questions around, could be that of "Twinkle little star", for next also the sun as well,
except for still only the Earth, for next also that of ourselves, for also an evolved civilization.

My guess is that explaining such a thing with respect to that of Religion, for only that of origin, or maybe ancestry, for also such a thing as where we once came from,
could be the norm, or perhaps common term.

Perhaps not necessarily any Philosophy with only respect to itself either, but rather that could be both Adam and Eve, for also Lucy as well,
except for still not any cultivation of the soil either, for making it only bread at breakfast.

Could we sometimes make it a bit of Worshipping, when it only could be Stone Age man for such, except not any Heathen, or Pagan either?

"You are what you eat", except for not any sailor at sea either, or perhaps only the fisherman catching a cod in his net, for that of modest meal,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swordfish

Except for not any sardines either, of course.

But still only pushing the car, when it runs out of petrol, or maybe only for that of an icy road, in that we could still be back at both Probability and Logic.

Keying in just "Probabilistic equation" in the Wikipedia, and it does not take that one, and here perhaps expecting a little bit better,
except not any "argument" for such a thing either.

Makes me think that we sometimes could make it nature only, for also a common denominator, when we actually could get across many different phenomena,
and also the respective properties for the similar things.

Evolution could sometimes still mean a difference, and not necessarily because once thing could be put in place for that of another,
except not any juxtaposition for such either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pterosaur

Almost there, but it could also be flying, and have a long beak as well, for next also better defined as well.

But again, that we still could be making it the "Man in the Street", and also a couple of geniuses, for next their separate thing, and getting a bit tired here.

But rather "Whoosh", for next also the feather, if not any pillow either, and at least you did not believe in that story.

Perhaps rather look at your fingertips instead, if not even past your fingers either, for that of the Aura, because here back with me for this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aura

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aura_(paranormal)

If only from the first, next also a not too good start as well.

So what could you do, if encountering a hurdle, if not in the starting pit, for next running a Marathon, or perhaps only a race?

Next perhaps only charging, if not any part of an orchestral performance either, which could be that of a chapter in a book.

Looking for the word here, except for not any grip for that of a handle either.

Could you rather make such a thing as extracting the human civilization, only by using the Drake equation for such a thing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population

What if it rather became that of star versus stellar population instead?

Have a look at the number 7 instead, for next both a bit of rest, if perhaps not any leap year either, for next also days in the week.

If such a thing as both life and death could be a method, for also a practice as well, except for not any Method as such,
at least we could be making it both life and death, for also the sake, if not purpose, for that of life itself.

the purpose sanctifies the means

Except for perhaps the trap, for next also trapdoor, we could still make it Reason as well, and also a way of escaping that of suffering of pain, when next only making it death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

Really, it should be better just reading a book, except for not pouring any hot water on your fingers either, for next being burnt, except not any fried in an oven either.

Except for still sometimes happening, next for both that of ageing, if not any Parkinsons decease either.

Listen to the news reporter on the scene, and he could be throwing it back to the studio, if not any dishes either, for that of only dishwashing,
except for still not any Fundamental questions either, sometimes lacking an answer for such, if perhaps not any such thing as Proof either.

If still only such a thing as Probability, for also Logic as well, you next could also think it could be true as well, only for that possibility being left open,
because next perhaps all answers as well.

My guess is that you do not use a cord anymore, for that of visiting the toilet, except for perhaps only the Umbilical cord for such a thing.

Here sometimes uprightness, rectitude, or integrity, for what you perhaps could be, except for not any science either, which possibly could mean or be the same.

In fact, if you happen to read between the lines, possibly a word for all of this, but next not one which I do have.

If rather such a thing as only proving the Moon, for also its existence, except for still only the sun, you probably know where it goes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulliver

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulliver%27s_Travels

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nocturne

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint

Wait a little, or hang on, but should not a Saint be perhaps also eternal, for a bit of Eternal entity, except for perhaps not any Christian either, for next also Christ?

"Dip, and take cover", and next forgetting the first part, except for still not lying below the table, only because a couple of bombs could be falling in my head.

Perhaps rather "Duck" instead, except for not any "Donald Duck" either, because here sometimes a stalemate between different Ideologies.

Could you next make it "Love me tender" as well, except for still not keeping a tab on a couple of things, for also making it only the celestial sky.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_forum.php?id=1511

Almost forgot that little thing, for next also a discussion which could be around.

Or perhaps rather a hallmark of sorts, for also characteristics, or maybe even dress, when you sometimes could recognize another one,
except for only yourself, and next also feel comfort, as well as also a close relationship as well, only because he or she could be your close friend.

It really becomes that of making it only the flat soil, if perhaps not any hard either, when it rather could be a mattress, except for sometimes being left out for
both word to say, and also a couple of options.

If perhaps sometimes chewing the apple, for also tasting, you know that it could be sour, if not any acid either.

Except for rather make it Eve, for also Garden of Eden, next for both the snake, and also the tree as well, perhaps only a fluke for the whole thing,
next for also its possible description.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

Except for still not any "never say never" either, because here translating into both mislead, entice, confuse, and also deceive, for that of a couple of things.

"Ask me", and next also ask me why such a thing as a dish could also mean that of pi as well, only because the dish could be round.

Except for no such thing as fools and horses either, when it sometimes could be rather geniuses.

If not wrong, a city in the United States with the name of Providence, except for also frugal, or frugality as well, if not any austerity either, for also
a bit of contentment or moderation as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process

Except for not any trust either, when it rather could be possible life, and we rather could make it Truth instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

Except for not any battle of sciences either.

If still the nail for next also the hammer, if not making it any feather either, who could be hitting the nail, in order to proceed, or at least be made understood?

Could we still make it a bit of modesty, if not any such thing as embarrassment, or bashfulness either, when it sometimes actually happens?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credo

Except for still not any E=mc2 either, next for only that of science.

Or perhaps only a detective for such a thing, except for still not any Shepherd either, who could sometimes be leading my way.

Or perhaps only the link in the past, for that of a woman sitting down at the piano, for also doing such a thing, if still not only such a thing either.

Because here also "Come on" as well, for that of a melody, or perhaps female singer, except for not having artist, or melody,
but perhaps still a quite decent person only performing the whole piece.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amputation

Oh so sad, for next also the good man as well, except for still not any fork either, which could be that of eating your food, rather than soup.

Make it rather a talent artist, and next also sometimes "majestic" as well, and you next could also know all the answers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12

Any such thing as a Conspiracy here, except for still only the Truth?

The elephant is not supposed to forget either, except for still sometimes "sucks" only, when it comes to that of a story.

Here that of confer, or maybe cf. once again, except for not any juxtaposition either, when you sometimes could make it a story, for also proving,
if not still being doubtful, and next also not any believer at all.

Read my lips for that of a bit of Darwin, and next also that of strong versus weak, next for sometimes also character.

What if rather than a pedestal, for also sometimes a juxtaposition, we still could make it glamour, for a bit of hope, in the same way as also hopelessness a
bit of demise, or maybe even perdition?

Or should rather Credibility go for such a thing as Belief, in that it also could sometimes be that of a Proof?

Do not forget the Apostles of the Horses either, for also that of a bit of guidance, for also sometimes that of science as well, if still not only Religion.

I happen to run a couple of tasks at times, including CUDA tasks, and for this also a bit of noise.

But sometimes also more calm parts as well, for that of a bit less noise, for that of data being present in the task.

Next listening in as well, and it could sometimes be that of a "chirp" being heard, for next also sound, if perhaps not only pure imagination either.

Strolling away, for that of updating a couple of numbers, and losing track of everything here.

Yes, rear end, for also end butt, if not any speaking backward either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmony

You may also make or get it that of "clang", if looking or reading a bit down here, except for still not any "Do Re Mi", for that of music alone.

Could we put it all together, for next also answers as well, except for perhaps still only a piece for that of supposedly everything?

Or perhaps rather "meant to be", for also its possible meaning.

This because perhaps assumedly no tenet or doctrine, for that of science itself, except for still only making it a bit of Mathematics and Physics.

My guess is that a drug addict would never bother about such a thing as 40 % beverage, or alcoholic contents, when it rather could be a full dose of Heroin or Cocaine.
next for that of need.

Sometimes even Politicians could be asking for a temperate, if not any modesty either, when a given Politics could be carried out in advance, for next also sometimes need.

Forget the little pause, for that of sometimes playback, except for that of only such a thing itself, namely playback.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

Catch my meaning here, for that of sometimes sets and subsets, for next also the meaningless as well, which sometimes could mean nothing.

Or forget the traveling salesman as well, when that of implications, sometimes could mean implications for that of nature as well, and in such or similar sense,
should also make us also sometimes comprehend.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lilliput

Does not readily take it here, right now, except for not any Smallpox either.

Should we still think that something could be of value, next with respect to itself, or perhaps rather something else?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahogany

If a sense of "Belief", for next also believing in a story, could also be that of pulling a carpet beneath our legs, what perhaps next?

Could you sometimes make it cheating into that of "Proof", only because of Logic, or perhaps Method of Proof?

Here not my body liking the biscuits either, so throwing it overboard.

Exccept for maybe only accepted facts, for only a couple of Proof.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color

Or maybe rather only "ditto", for sometimes both Richard Haselgrove and also myself, believing in the subject of UFO's.

Why not the black tangent of the piano instead, except for perhaps not any such thing as WYSIWYG either?

Or maybe rather a "slot" for such a thing, when it next could be both presence, if not any Existence either, for also sometimes Comprehension as well.

Dark energy

Dark matter

You be my guest, of course.

Or perhaps 1800 only, for also 1900, if not any 1600, or 1700, and next both rewind, if not any recapitulate either, for next back into the past, for also story.

Or, rather "steady", for also a look into the future, for what it next could also bring, except for not being part of any Equation either.

Sheesh, at least Einstein could be saying it. except for not any naught still resisting a couple of facts.

Could you next make it any Newton or Einstein readily "accepted", if perhaps not any acknowledged either, which could mean a possible Postulat, or Axiom?

You be my guest of course, except for still looking for a couple of answers.

Walk on thin ice sometimes, for next also being only pure water beneath, except for sometimes not drawing any direct conclusions either.

"Wind him up", and next also the track as well, if not any stairs either, and next also a thing to be considered.

So, any nature here in its sleeves, for next also being readily considered, if not any acknowledged either?

Or maybe rather tooth, for next also teeth as well, next only in your mouth.

Cornerstone - and needs checking here.

Feeling well, and perhaps no so, and not only because of mental health, but possibly because of other reasons.

Pretension - next supposed to be, except for not any be, of course, except for always only a given answer to everything.

If a famous equation for that of E=mc2, what is next the similar answer, for also making it 9, when it also could be 10?

Or maybe rather only dumbness, for also silliness, when it also could be a that of a measure for a couple of things,
except for not any close to the heart either.

Or maybe rather an ordered sequence, for next you also could believe, if not any making up such a thing either,
when rather a couple of Equations could be out of fashion, for also lacking a similar, or corresponding meaning, for next also similar context.

If believing in possible aliens, for also not believing as well, next back to business, if not any back to the future either,
for at least the person I sometimes could pretend to be.

Oh, questioning a possible Method, for that of also its possible meaning.

Next adequate, for also a bit reasonable, except for sometimes a bit of meaning.

Any limits for that of science, and next also Proof, in that we sometimes could believe in a couple of things?

Any Phil Burden in here, for next also a pest?

Except for still science only asking a couple of questions, leaving us to answer the similar thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma

If you did not already know, of course,but why still "pick" on nature for such a thing. when it rather could be or become Questions and Answers?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Eddington

Bonkers, at least some "e" here, and also mentioned before.

typical versus atypical

Losing out again, for also Internet Explorer11, and the way it could be handling its buffer, for next also losing everything.

So it goes.

Or down the list right now, for a bit of music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0HwDzKoxRg

Took a little while getting at here.

Enjoy the show.

At least I could know or make it a difference between red and blue when needed, or perhaps necessary.

Should read Internet Explorer 11, in the previous.

Why not pick a couple of leaves in the early spring, for also no one left, for also nothing a well?

Look at the pavement, for next also your walking, except for not the water passing by either, ending up in the drain.

Except for still you the hero of course, and next also in charge.

Make it subtle, and next also subtlety as well, for only its laureates.

Oh. prosperous, and next also rich as well.

Except for not "Am" either, which could mean metallicity among the stars (ga,mma Arietis).

Here the cat, for also animal, next jumping through the ring as well, Saga.

Except for only a ring of such. which could rather mean the Force of gravity.

Say hello. next also goodbye, except for only a user either, in a regular way.

Doughnut versus sometimes Pillars of Creation, except for still not only you.

Problem here, "You is", except for not the spoken word either,

Why make it such a thing as a pedestal, when it rather could be only spoken words only, for next also detecting possible intelligent civilizations in space,
except for still only ourselves?

I guess you are not that good or clever on the subject of numbers either, but rather leave it to a couple of users for such a thing.

Perhaps the main problem is that we sometimes could make it "In the shadows, for also hiding, or perhaps lurking, as well,
except for not any rational explanation for the possible phenomenon, except for still only "Open up your mind", for that of yourself.

Here in the more general context, since I choose not to make it any Reply to here.

But also making it rational, rather than Logical above, because we also could make it sometimes sanity versus insanty as well, and next not a good example either.

Should scientists be more reluctant of accepting a possible phenomen, rather than only taking it for granted sometimes, for also that of a readily acknowledgent,
next for also a couple of facts?

Some people could still dismiss the whole subject of UFO's, except for perhaps not laughing either, while others might think or perhaps believe that they are in the center,
or perhaps main focus, or focal point, where all events could happen.

The best place to both know and learn, should be that of a laboratory.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory

Could you sometimes make it evolution a tool of nature, except for sometimes ageing only, when it next could also be that of ourselves?

If perhaps a tool, also a mechanism as well, in that we could know much of the inner-working in nature, for the part of regular business, including fusion in the core of stars.

If rather such a thing as predictability versus unpredictability, also a thing which could be measured, for sometimes not being counted either.

If the Uncertainty Principle could be flipped, or switched around, next that it could be telling the remaining part, for next also bits and pieces,
except for also most likely proven as well, because you could make it that of Certainty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty

For that of number theory, and discussed at PrimeGrid, we have the Riemann hypothesis, but when looking at the two articles for this, it also becomes a thought about that of wave
characteristics as well, including also the sinusoidal curve.

Becomes yet another reminder here of the tools for that of nature itself, where it could be either/or, for also neither/nor, except for also Certainty versus Uncertainty,
for still the same nature also left to sometimes decide.

Or perhaps rather a simple adventure, before I go for tonight.

Namely the Danish novel about the Princess on the pea, for that of a dozen or so mattresses, and next unable to sleep, because of the pea being located below the bottom pillow.

Because of that, it becomes an Analogy, and what could next be the opposite, except for still any story?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy

Note the figure at the right here, for that of Rutherford's model of the atom, for which a Hydrogen atom could be one such example.

If sometimes different meanings, for also opposite meanings, at least quantifying the Universe, for also stars and galaxies, could be possible,
except for not telling any such thing at all, for that of only emptiness.

If the Drake equation could be making for a Probability for a couple of civilizations only to exist, it is because of the individual elements making up this equation,
which we also could regard as factors.

Just laughing at a couple of people, only because you are not able to decide yourself, perhaps is not a good thing either, when we still could make it billions of stars,
next with only respect ourselves, for that of a civilization.

In this way, or perhaps context, it also becomes that of measurability, as usual.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decay

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_decay

If still a bit of science around, here it could be read around as well, except for not the same as above.

If the Uncertainty Principle could be flipped, or switched around, next that it could be telling about the remaining part, for next also bits and pieces,
except for also most likely proven as well, because you could make it that of Certainty.

Or perhaps still only a phenomenon, because I should be in bed.

And not able to make it to the shop today, because they started digging up the football field below my flat, where there is also a forest located beneath.

Here also an old bunker, or kind of fortress, hidden in the woods, which could be an ancient one, but people have apparently thrown a bit of thrash in there,
and almost like a forest in the jungle, for that of density.

Except for still not the field itself, which is a bit too large for that of its current use, and becomes a reminder of sometimes mismatch being found between things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Element

Here also a similar reminder, if not any comparison either, that it not always needs to be "Elementary, dear Watson" either, for that of a crime novel.

Two invalid tasks, and also two inconclusive tasks, with my parent project PrimeGrid, does not make things any better, so I rather be in bed,
because like some other people here, sometimes making it better as well, always such a thing for science, when perhaps needed.

And perhaps no time for shopping either, when back at 02:45 AM in the morning, because here it became "Down to the river" in the meantime,
for also a possible way of attitude for that of sentimentality, if not any nostalgy either, because starting to get older.

So, if perhaps not any "boo boo" either, for that of a translation, also that "bummer", for sometimes scientific bummer, could perhaps translate into "fadese" as well,
but here large caps for the latter word, so a bit unsure.

But rather think of only jumping up and down, if not any Java applet, or figure for such a thing, but rather "strolling" on the Moon, for such a thing,
and next perhaps not any similar "blunder" either, but rather a hip movement of sorts, because it becomes a short journey through both time and space.

Except for perhaps not the wording either, about everything going up, should be coming down as well, rather that of a gravitational field,
where a possible upward motion, by means of force for such a thing, like the uplifting of a rocket, could make it coming down, if not any tumbling down either,
if for some reason ending up empty.

Make it both large and small, if not any vice versa, and a large object should be attracting a smaller one, relative to not only their sizes, but also masses,
and here thinking about the environment of space, for such a thing.

If rather still about counting, for also enumeration as well, I could be just sitting here, if still not making it any hypocrisy either, for making it countless stars and planets
throughout the Universe, as well as also galaxies, and clusters of galaxies, still only with respect to ourselves.

Except for still the red dots, still a bit confused whether it should be one word for that of another, when sometimes translating, except for the final word
being the one which should be used.

If rather Logic could be having its deficiencies, for that of a lack of options, meaning only true versus false, for a couple of things, also that Probability could make it
slightly better, in that there also could be a Probabilistic equation for such a thing, namely a factor for determining the number of possible civilizations in space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation

Therefore not any such thing as being a musician either, if not rather spending your time in a museum, for also watching a couple of artifacts making up history,
next for also a bit of treasures, or sometimes heirloom, or the like.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Museum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artifact

Or perhaps still only about Embalming, when it could be a golden mask for such a thing, if perhaps no such thing as eternal life either, only because of also life versus death.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embalming

In fact, the Scientific Method could sometimes be about Traditions only, except for only that of spending a bit of time, preparing for that of a funeral sequence,
except for sometimes the thin ice only, for that of a couple of Artifacts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tradition

If still rather only an embrace, for next also a kiss, perhaps not the same as "brace yourself", when next also perhaps braking as well, in order to avoid a collision,
or perhaps sometimes even be hit.

Like the previously mentioned "Curiosity killed the cat", perhaps still not any black cat across the road either, only because there also could be both winners and losers with
respect for science, in order to next not making up the facts of a story.

If still sometimes science itself, next with respect to a couple of scientists, next at least believe in yourself, for making it such a thing, except for sometimes not any real,
or true facts, for that of a story which perhaps could be told.

Making it a couple of lights in the sky, should perhaps not be the same as the blue color of the clear sky either, only because the latter would never fade, and next go away.

If sometimes a lie for that of a story which could be told, perhaps not the same for that of any Creation either, where at least you could make it a couple of facts,
except for perhaps not any Credibility at all.

Here sometimes the Face on Mars, for such a thing, and next also Cydonia as well, if perhaps not any forest either, if it rather could be the top of a mountain instead.

It makes me think that Credibility, for also a bit of Probability, should not be the same as any Logic either, when you next could also "believe" as well, for that of a story.

Suffice to say, that except for the colors of the sky, also that both Newton and Einstein were the scientists who came up with the Laws of nature, for that of Equations,
which next made it into that of "Fundamental Forces of nature", as well.

So, except for still a bit of twist and shout, also that it could be "roundabouts" as well, in that we could make it a "Magical number" as well, for also a 1024-bit number,
in that we are in the process of factorizing this number in a more usual or regular way, except for no such thing as "cracking" at all.

But rather that it still could become "Mysteries, magic, and miracles", as well, for also a bit of "Magical mystery tour", in that we could choose to make it a bit of
symbolism for such a thing, if perhaps not any symbols either, for also a "Symbolic" gest or feature".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolic

Perhaps not the best wording, but you may perhaps have seen the face being viewed almost sideways, for also a bit of white and gray shading as well.

If perhaps not any oblate, or elongated either, at least it could be showing us the way for what it perhaps could tell, if still not the letter "A" inside capital "O",
for also a bit of stretched out arms, for that of a naked body (human male), and not the same as any Anarchy, or even the finger of God for creating Adam.

Make it rather the Arecibo message here (and not the WOW signal), and this figure of a human could be showing up in the sent, or broadcasted message,
because here "figure" not the best word either, for also that of a transmission.

If rather this message could be "conveying" intelligence, by means of also a possible meaning, also that a received message should be interpreted in the same way,
except for perhaps still not the WOW signal either.

If still that of a couple of symbols, for next also a representation as well, perhaps not the same as "showing the way" either, for next also science versus any Religion,
except for sometimes the possibility of interpreting it in such a way.

If you happen to be a Christian, except for perhaps not a believer, for also "true believer" as well, always that converting into one Religion from another,
could be a possibility, except for still those symbols, or even swastika, which could be making for a nature next for both good and bad, if perhaps not any preference.

If God could sometimes be showing us the way, for that of a direction, perhaps still not any divert, for next also looking back, when it also could be a Shepherd for
such a thing, and next part of your life as well, for keeping a tab on you, except for still only in the shadows.

If rather flying through both air, and next also space, when choosing to divert from the original destination, you also change direction, and perhaps also speed as well.

If rather looking back through passed life, only because death is near, or coming, it becomes that of "retrospect" for such a thing, except for perhaps still not any spirits either,
when it perhaps should not be about any memory recall either, only because you could be left to see both success and failure.

Except for both hypnotic regression, for such a thing, if perhaps not any movie either, it rather could end up be the soar moment for that of a relative passing away,
at least for the one being left back, except for not the events which could be taking place for the one who could be actually passing away.

If still making it a scientific God, for that of a living place, versus also a resting place, also that of a whereabouts as well, where you could spend at least life,
if perhaps not your soul either, for next that of Eternity.

If not wrong, the Forces of nature should still be both Matter, Energy, and also gravity as well, except for perhaps not any invisible or hidden forces for that of
any Afterlife either, like perhaps the mentioned "Aura".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aura

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aura_(paranormal)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendence

I find it more easy to key in just "Aura" here, for that of the first, in order not to be left stuck on a science for which there could be no actual proof.

Therefore still the first link here, except for still sometimes left in the dark, for also making it the Scientific Method at times, when it also could be only a laugh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levitation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meditation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoga

Switching order of input here, because the cubical magnet could be a bit more of science, than the latter two.

But again, both hope, versus sometimes hopelessness only, when next feeling lost as well, for that of only looking in vain between the stars, for that of a signal which
never could be showing up, for also manifesting itself.

Except for still only a sense that rather making it a story being told, for that of nature, perhaps should rather be the better way of approach for a couple of things.

Keying in just "Down to the river", and in fact Bruce Springsteen here, and also something which I could be guessing as well.

Like still not being an American myself, for also a native as well, also that the wording, or slant "not seeing the forest for any trees",
perhaps should go as well, in that we sometimes could make it at least physical laws for that of the Universe, except for perhaps still not such a thing as Creation itself.

Here more that of thinking for the better, while also making it better, if perhaps not any striving either, in that we still could be in the dark for a precise explanation of the
origin of the Universe, except for still making it both ourselves, and also a couple of aliens and extraterrestrials, for also intelligent civilizations as well.

"Feeling good", and perhaps still also so, except for also James Brown as well, except for sometimes still the battle between science and Religion,
for next also that of a better understanding.

Look at a painting, like for example Picasso, if perhaps not any Rembrandt either, and possibly one such showing black and white squares,
next diagonally with respect to each other, and except for a only a droplet of water, perhaps no such thing as "Comprehension" either,
because it rather could be still only space.

Except for still not any environment for such either, where you rather could be wearing shoes, for also the first footstep, like a step on the Moon,
also that it could be the Universe as a whole, for next also a bit of Comprehension as well, when still making for such a thing as both large and small,
with respect to each other, and also our own insignificance in the vastness of space, for also its huge size.

If still perhaps not the "Life of Brian" either, for next only tell me, where could I perhaps go, except for actually not going there either, next thinking I could perhaps
know or understand it all.

If still only that of vast size, for also being blown out of fashion, next for also respective size, also still that of both vastness and enormity,
if perhaps not any emptiness either, when we sometimes could be making it voids as well.

If still perhaps insignificance for that of ourselves, next with respect to the Universe itself, also perhaps still "Little Green Men" as well,
for at least a notion, or perhaps sense of belief (not religious belief), except for still not any such thing as Comprehension itself,
when it at least could be that of size, if not making it any dimensions either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology

Here the second link comes up as a suggestion, except for perhaps not making any direct reference on the spot either, before reading,
when it rather could be about Religion for the latter, and next wait a little.

Because in my opinion, Cosmology should still be only such a thing, and next for also science as well, except for no argument either,
which could be telling about possible Existence, rather than a similar development, or evolution.

"In the beginning" . . .

In fact it is a quite famous phrase, and I better should be having it all, except for perhaps still not any Creation myth here, when it rather could be still science.

Because making it "God created the Universe", with next also some missing parts of the sentence, or phrase, rather should be explaining it better.

Could we still make it levels of energy, for also levels of intelligence, if perhaps not any Conscience either, and next also make it both large and small,
for also bits and pieces, except for not any such thing for that of an Equation either, which sometimes could go for that of the Uncertainty principle?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

Except for only myself as once a small boy, and also attending school as well, except for still not any magnificent, which also could be magnificent,
or magnificence as well, for next also a couple of celestial splendors, or even a showcase visible in the sky.

If still that of "Measurability", for making it both large and small, if not any "miniscule" either, we still could measure a couple of things, next with also a reference to ourselves,
for that of a similar insignificance, with respect to the Universe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel

Here at least the painting, if not making it the "inner circle" for a couple of things either.

If perhaps only Meaning, for also mean, we also probably agreed that making it larger, for both size, and also values, could next also increase its possible "meaning",
by next also at least value, if perhaps not any "Comprehension" either.

Or perhaps rather significance, rather than just meaning, above.

As usual, the old melody "I am the oat", or perhaps wheat, should not be the same as "bark over oats", or "goat of geese either",
when it still could be only through the chimney, for next Santa Claus, when next forgetting the rest.

Or should it rather be the "whip", for next also "wimp", except for not any person either, when it rather could be a couple of Equations,
making for at least such a thing as Logic?

Except for still not any "Fallacies" on its own either, I mentioned previously that Logic perhaps is not telling it all, for next also the whole thing,
when rather it could be Probability making it slightly better.

Is it not a fact, except for not any strange either, that Intellect, by means of possible Intelligence, could next make it a genius as well, for next also a bit of telling?

Perhaps a bit hard to explain, except for perhaps not making it any "Holy Grail" either, when it rather could be that of a seed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holy_Grail

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_Supper

Slip my finger for not making it any Noah's Ark either, because as previously mentioned, at least ending up with Last Supper right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah%27s_Ark

And still not any Forest either, for next also a Tabletop mountain of sorts, when it still rather could be about Comprehension, if not such a thing as Cosmology either.

We still could be making it a bit of "Truth" for next also science itself, including both Method, and also Proof, except for not stepping into, or walking across a minefield,
for next a science which we may not believe in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crusader

Here only a general suggestion, in lack of perhaps anything better, except for perhaps Babylon 5, for that of a science fiction movie.

If still only an answer, for next also an explanation as well, and we next should rather make it science, rather than perhaps any Religion,
still possibly that of Comprehension as well, except for not always making it any "Stairways to Heaven" either, when it still could rather be the Universe.

Are we not taking it for granted, except for not also fact as well, that Dr. Stephen Hawking, when still alive, could be telling about the Universe,
not only because of any given Comprehension, but rather because of facts, for still also whereabouts and belongings?

If sometimes making it fact, or fact-finding for a couple of things, you supposedly could be making it "Truth" for also such things as well, because it should be both in the answer,
and next also in the cards.

If still pretending to be a scientist, it really should be hard dealing a couple of cards, next one for science in the left hand, and also one for Religion, in the right hand,
because you rather could be left to choose.

If still rather such a thing as Cosmology, it also could be expected that of climbing a couple of stairs, if perhaps not any ladders either,
for that of sometimes reaching a conclusion, except for still not any guesses either.

Supposedly we could still make it sometimes Philosophy, when we could rather choose between science and Religion, for next also a couple of answers given.

If still having to do the shopping, I probably would pass by the fruit, for also the melon, if not any apples, or oranges either.

If still rather an engraving, you also could be making it a signature, except for not any watermark, for that of sometimes "Google" being visible.

Only making it a Universe filled with such a thing as stars, planets and galaxies, and next also a bit of Comprehension as well, for also a sense that we might perhaps not be alone,
for still also the vastness of space.