Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 109 · 110 · 111 · 112 · 113 · 114 · 115 . . . 332 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1932268 - Posted: 27 Apr 2018, 8:07:35 UTC
Last modified: 27 Apr 2018, 8:10:39 UTC

I don't think CreditScrew really does not matter here, after 15 years of service.

What we really need, is a readily acknowledgment of facts, only because it could also be science, and next also true facts happening as well.

So it goes.
ID: 1932268 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1932278 - Posted: 27 Apr 2018, 10:03:36 UTC
Last modified: 27 Apr 2018, 10:12:35 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF5bPI92-5o

Here, a bit of drunkenness, except for perhaps not the debate either.

Sorry about that.

Forget my 15 years here.

So, what is "Eutopia", or perhaps stands for?

Only by reading, or perhaps listening, of course.

Edit: A gardener?

Still listening in, of course.
ID: 1932278 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1933494 - Posted: 4 May 2018, 3:54:21 UTC
Last modified: 4 May 2018, 4:03:34 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motto

So, why do you need any seatbelts, when entering the rollercoaster for having a wild or tumultuous ride in a circus?

Are you afraid of perhaps falling off, when it even could enter the complete loop, and you could be facing down to the ground while still in your chair?

Compare with this project, where the subject of Logic is perhaps of importance when it comes to giving credibility to both stories, and also people behind.

But next apparently still trying for what we could be doing, except for not any try and fail either, for that of a fail-safe method.

Make it you as the reader, and next also the dictionary in your hand, for what you could next see, or perhaps get, or even think.

Here the strange thing that water makes it into ice when next freezing, but also that we could make it still that of one thing versus another,
only for that of reference, or perhaps comparison.

Make it space, and next perhaps also the Universe as well, but we could still be having the debate about evolution, and next also about ourselves.

If picking up some dirt, or sand, you always would know that it could be matter, for next also materialize into such a thing as well,
but next we could also make it the subject of Religion as well, where for a couple of reasons, any results could come up empty handed.

Easy to say when you perhaps are postman Pat, but next such a thing as life in the Universe is not a common thing either, including that of such a thing
next to every star being part of the Milky Way.

Am I supposed to believe of myself as part of an Existence, only because the celestial sky could be filled with stars, and we perhaps are not alone?

But rather the story could go around that we still choose to value ourselves next to that of nature, perhaps thinking or believing that we could be slightly different.

For this, still ourselves as only a pinpoint, or even small speck, of the whole thing, which next is still the Universe.

If not wrong, intelligence could still be measured by means of an Intelligence Quotient (IQ).

But except for that, we tend, or perhaps prefer making it both matter, gravity, and energy for the rest, only because it could be still the Universe.

Silly me, I forgot the glasses, and next I am perhaps stupid as well.

Make it rather instinct or aggression, next also nature at its best, or at least close to it, or so.

feinschmecher

But if rather the "nitty-gritty", of sorts, for that of "to the point", rather than perhaps boring,

You, me, and next perhaps both, and we could find ourselves in company with that of Logic, only for that of understanding nature,
or perhaps understanding nature, by means of its underlying principles, or methods.

Perhaps a script, for that of a programming language, but next also a director as well,
for that of a script, or screenplay, and next for that of some video editing,
tapes could be rolling, including a couple of frames as well, for next that of still a script.

Here it became the Janus face, among a couple of other things, and next also thinking that it could well be Achilles versus the turtle, on the running field,
if not any different levels of intelligence, conscience, or even comprehension, as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stearin

Make it both candles, and next also candlelights as well, also that the Shroud of Turin could be showing the face of Jesus Christ.

If perhaps not dinner served, he could also be making food, or perhaps dinner, for a couple of people in the desert, only because he also wanted the small ones coming to him.

We could make it perhaps detail versus whole, but rather we are speaking of part versus whole for such a thing, except for not any turtle versus the candlelight either.

Same goes with that of Logic as well, in that we could think that it is a property of nature, in order to understand a couple of things.

Make it perhaps love, if you will, and next also a seeker as well, except for not any match versus mismatch either.

In order to understand evolution, you also have to know about the fundamentals of nature, including both Laws and Equations, and also elemtary particles.

If only still the "Heat of the night", next also because it could be still summer, except for not making it any smile of Mona Lisa, next for perhaps a half-hearted thing.

Making it Achilles versus the candlelight, when it rather should be the turtle, of course a mismatch of sorts, but where next that of different levels for a couple of things,
when it rather should be different levels of knowledge, or perhaps understanding, for such a thing?

Here, minuscule versus infinitesimal, for next that of small, if perhaps not even more, or something else either.

Life is boring, some could perhaps say, except for not any book of science either, which could be telling the most of things.

Honestly, we could sometimes be making it that of infinity, next for that of diversity as well, only because it could fit a given purpose.

But if perhaps so, what else, or perhaps next?

Knock-knock, something like the Three Wise Men, except for not any Einstein either, for that of his famous words, if not any equation either.

Something like "God is not . . . ", and next not having the rest in front of me.

martyr, for that of a sacrifice, except for not making it any
shrine or sanctuary either

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavo_(constellation)

Here for that of a nice constellation in the celestial sky, except for not making it any Phoenix either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_(constellation)

Make it rather the flat table, and you know that Jesus was having a meal together with his disciples.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peafowl

Make it still the coffin, or perhaps urn, for that of a funeral, and next also a bit of worshipping taking place.

In some cases, we could perhaps quantisize, for next also matter being possible, but also that of the undefined as well, which could be lacking an answer.

Logic could still tell about the silly or stupid idiot, except for not making such a thing of myself either, only because it could next also be telling about
life elsewhere in space, and also in quite large amounts as well.

Please do not forget that space is voluminous, and therefore that life could be widespread, if not still dispersed as well.

proportions / proportionality

Here the little better one fell out of my mind.

Be proud of yourself, and next also embrace as well, except for still not any nitty-gritty either, because when or while still eating,
you could be doing so with both arms, except for not making it any Jesus for that of your soul, and next also think that infinity could be an embrace of sorts.

So, which way, so to speak, except for not making it any naught for that of 0, zero, or nil either.

Make it that of infinity, and next also embrace it as well, for next that of everything, and next also such a thing for that of Existence.

Is Jesus supposed to be a different explanation of the whole thing, or should it rather be an embrace only?

Encompass

The funny thing is that we could be still making it both Heaven and Hell for a couple of things, only because it also could be science.

Next two different books, next for that of science and Religion, respectively, and for some reason we perhaps think that one thing could be just nonsense.

Perhaps a book, or movie, for such a thing, except for not a written script either, but something like "From here to Eternity", for such a thing.

Needs checking here.

Next perhaps a hurting back for that of the saddle, but except for not any Millennium Falcon either, also the Millennium empire as well, for that of Adolf Hitler,
except for not finding it right now.

The Oath of Faithfulness

allegiance

fidelity, here for that of faithful, or faithfulness

But next swear as well, except for not making it any curse either.

So, perhaps still intervals as well, except for not any scale either, and you next could think that Messiah could be your friend,
next as Jesus Christ, for such a thing, including that of being a savior.

Is it not so that you could have a dish in front of you, and next fill it up with food, next to eat?

What if the Devil could grab the food in front of you, only because he could be homeless, and next need something to eat?

But rather God, so to speak, because he could either be in front of you, or perhaps rather in disguise, next hiding in the shadows.

So, making it still infinity, and next also matter only, except for not any "Credo" either, for next that of possibly believe.

In a broader sense, you could be still having the fireman standing on a ladder, next for a bit of comprehension as well,
except for not catching a breath either, and next enjoying the whole sight, or perhaps show.

Still infinity, for that of both a context, and also notion, but also that different levels of intelligence could be such for that of conscience as well.

Make it Creation itself, and next also "nuff said", or perhaps enough, for that of also everything, except for not such a thing as a Creator,
which could be responsible for everything.

One game being played far back ago, was that of Domino, except for not any Fats Domino either, next for that of Poker.

Always the match versus mismatch, and next something is wrong as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect

Catch you later for that of positive versus negative numbers, except for not any infinity either, but we should also know about Gaussian distribution being
part of Probability, for such a thing.

So, here you are, next for that of an open hand, except for not any hearsay either.

Perhaps no such a thing as any fiction either, for that of the Bible, including that of Jesus Christ, but still rather only matter itself,
next for that of infinity also being possible.

report, story, account

depiction, portrayal, journal

So, why such a thing as Horse of the Apostles, when it rather could be mules for such a thing, except for not the Bethlehem star either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_of_Bethlehem

Swear fidelity, and next also allegiance as well, except for not making it any Devil either, for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vinyl

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyvinyl_chloride

Do not forget that the old phonographic records came on that of vinyl, and was playable only, by using a staple or pin for such a thing.

Next, abacadabra, if not any "alfa and omega" either, and it became replaced with the laser, for next the CD, or DVD player, for such a thing.

Here thinking that Logic itself could be for that of a "measure", but next perhaps not about any quantities either.

I could make it perhaps "Superior Being" for a couple of things, and next also perhaps immeasurable as well, except for not any scale, for that of measurability.

Guess we could be dealing with the possible handshake at times, including that of protocols, except for not any shaking hands with that of an alien instead.

Make it rather Monotheism, for that of a single God, and next also diversity, or mangfold, for that of nature.

Here perhaps both the ape or monkey, except for not jumping off scale either, for that of a needle which could be used.

Here that of "Oops", and next that of speed as well, because I was in a hurry, but except for perhaps talent, Creation could still be on my mind, and next also subject.

Here the word "beyond", and next such a thing for that of "far, far away", including the stars of the celestial sky, except for not any far away in Baagad either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAaCes5pv4A

Is it you, or is it perhaps me, for next that of a pedestal, and next also an understanding of the Universe, for that of its possible whereabouts, or behavior?

Or is it perhaps because it is some two part, namely that of science, and also that of Religion?

You could perhaps make it both God and the Devil, and next also the Saint as well, but next also for that of good versus bad.

Makes me next think of Logic for such a thing, except for perhaps not the Universe either.

You see, sometimes
merciful
pitless(ly)
ruthless
relentless
merciless

and still the precious nature around, which could sometimes occupy your soul, and next also carry you away as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOgIitzKY7Q

Anyway, just a kick, and next it also goes as well, except for not any blows either.

Everything included, and next also embraced as well, for that of at least compassion, if not any comprehension either.

The "bootstrap" method, or routine, is a well known method for that of getting a PC, or computer, up and running.

Except for perhaps not any nature either, when it perhaps could be "high fidelity", or perhaps only pure Creation.

Speaking of levels, and next adjusting the volume as well, if not any mute, except for any thresholds which could be possible as well.

Dawn, for that of the break, or perhaps beginning of the day, but perhaps not the vision of the future either, which also could be telling about the past.

We know that the ruler could be that of a measurement tool as well, next for that of scale, and we could also end up light years away.

But also both past, present, if not any future as well, because it could also be about Prediction as well.

Make it rather "Tempus Fuight", and also that time could be lasting forever, except for perhaps no end.

So, make it perhaps 1024*768, except for not any 1600*1280 either (needs checking), but here that Achilles could be still chasing the turtle,
next for that of intervals, except for perhaps not being bellieved either.

So, Christopher Columbus eventually set sail for the Americas, next by using some three boats.

But also "New Horizons" as well, for that of the purpose of exploring Pluto, and its moons, except for not any oblivion either.

Make it rather "timeless fashion" as usual, and next also coin and coin, or even heads or tails.

But if rather give and take for a couple of things, also that nature could be ruthless, or even scrupelous, for such a thing.

Perhaps mentioned before, but should it still be "words" for such a thing, namely that of perhaps explaining God.

Oh, forget the book here, or even the Bible, because you already know that I put it away.

Yes, "ping-pong", and next also a bit of magic, for that of Wisdom as well, in order to bring the answer, and next before your feet.

Oh, do not forget the dial either, for that of 0-9, except for the tone for that of a digital playback, or representation either.

sight
face
presence
countenance

Why not such a thing as a "change", or difference instead?

"In the beginning", and next also past, present, and also the future, as usual.

Bring, brought, brought, and next perhaps the fruit, except for not any spelling either.

Here that of thesholds, except for not any bittersweet either, but rather "see you around", next for that of the Devil next to your grave.

Except for a pick, next also a switch as well, in that there could be a reason to "believe", and next in that of Heaven and Hell, for such a thing.

But next what about Creation itself, and its possible meaning?

Should it still be that of Heaven and Hell, for next that of God versus the Devil, or should we perhaps make it a different context of the whole thing?

randomness
accident
chance

Laws of accident, eh, except for not making it any pure "chance" either.

"In the beginning, God CREATED" the Universe".

Heck, abolishment slavery, and next I also forgot my keys as well, and it still could be that of nature.

Make it a smile, and next also laughter as well, except for not any "Yin and Yang" either, or perhaps still the Janus face.

But if rather predictable for a couple of things, next also unpredictable as well.

Edit, for that of a key lock of sorts, except for perhaps a couple of other things, and we could be still dealing with Creation at its hands,
next for both Equations and Laws.

Yes, practical, if not any symmetrical either, but should it still be about Laws and Equations of nature, pertaining to such a thing,
only because we happen to know?

Oh, wrong book perhaps, except for not the Bible either, because "ingenuous", or "all innocence" could be a common thing among humans,
next for that of "proclaiming" such a thing.

Except for not any "hot, hot", for such a thing, and next a supernova.

Yes, right hand for that of the Bible, and next the left hand for that of the Bible, or vice versa, and next we could also think that it could be "wrong".

Yes, "either/or", or "neither/nor", except for not making it any Bible either, but perhaps the footsteps of God as our Creator, in order to perhaps think,
if not know, what he perhaps meant by means of Creation, or perhaps such a thing.

Immorality is perhaps not the same as morality, because it could be still wrong, but is it perhaps about any "footsteps" either,
which could perhaps be made?

Perdition versus damnation, and next also "speaking of" as well.

Look, or perhaps read what I mentioned above, and next that your perfume making up the start of your day, is perhaps not any finish either.

Yes, grasp, if not any catch either, and you could be having Cindrerella versus the fly, for at least a bit of innocence around.

Jump the tracks of sorts, and next you could perhaps quantisize, for next making it a bit of infinity, except for not any "perdition" either.

Yes. make it time, and next also a scale as well, for that of a time frame next to live, and also enjoying yourself.

Here that of both black and white, except for not any raster graphics either, but suddenly it could become and event, or perhaps chance,
in order to decide next who could be chosen or selected to live, next to those who could die.

"The end", and next part of the story, except for perhaps not the beginning either, but rather the oblivion.

Here the clerk behind the desk, or counter, except for not any entrance door, or port either.

"Shall I tell you a secret", and next my father chose to die, or pass away, only because of nature itself.

"Roll out the carpet", and next also the Forces of nature as well, for such a thing as well.

Like ambigous, also ambiguity as well, in that nature could sometimes bring hope, except for not any loss either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinality

Like Harry met Sally (still), and next perhaps a notion about nature in that of general, or perhaps common terms.

Read my lips.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myth

Pretend it to be the "Laws of nature", if you will, but I could rather make it "Creation myth",

Hmm, still questions and answers, if you will and could it next be the Devil, only because he could be sinister?

Is it possible to question that of "right or wrong", or "right versus wrong", from that of a context of Logic alone?

ingredient

component

constituent

constituency

Or flavor, perhaps, for that of a taste.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table

Wake up, sunrise.

All set, and next ready to go, or perhaps no such thing either.

Forget the method which could be used, but rather make it sanskrit insted,
for next that of a writing, if not any spoken word.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit

Is death next part of life itself, and in which way is perhaps life defined?

Make it both levels and intervals, if perhaps not any thresholds either, because we could be left to explaining both intelligence, and also conscience,
next with respect to itself.

If you do not mind, but "What is your bidding, your Master", except for perhaps no such thing as infinity itself.

Think of infinity as a "constraint" of nature, by next also making it "Mysteries, magic, and miracles".

"All charging", if not any next charging, and also everyone could be aboard.

Oh, you don't see it, except for not any monkey either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Twain

Like me, next yourself as well, except for not any mine either, or perhaps even Pokemon.

Express yourself, and next also feelings as well, for also making it "Hallelujah".

Forget matter, or mass, for that of Matter Creation, and next wish the Holy Spirit welcome.

But next, Phoenix the bird, for that of a lost chance as well, and it went astray.

Any souls in here, except for not any "forgiving" either, or even lost ones?

Forget it, but I lost all or everything when it becomes to that of faith, including that of Christianity.

deputy

sittter(s)

Next, "On behalf of", and for that Jesus Christ, on the behalf of God, for that of temptations possible.

glory

glorification

Or perhaps the wrong door for the whole thing, I really do not know.

God gives, and God next takes, and you could have an "immeasurability scale" for such a thing.

Or perhaps "What if else", for such a thing, except for perhaps I do not know, either.

Any "Faith" of such, and next perhaps wrong as well, or you could be wrong.

But rather think of it as a "State of Union", for next that of present, if not any past, or even future either.

Hmm, 40% Cognac, and I am also the same level of perhaps drunk.

For this, still 8 AM in the morning, and still perhaps drunk.

Someting lilke "Epilog...", and here the Wikipedia is not with me right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistolography

Bummerme, and next perhaps also Saint as well.

Forgetit, except for not any "smooth" either.
ID: 1933494 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1933496 - Posted: 4 May 2018, 4:41:58 UTC
Last modified: 4 May 2018, 4:49:47 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DICT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetry

Here, meant that of a Poem, if perhaps not being translated either.

But next, a kiss, if not any lips either, or even a stampede, and it could be a fulfillment of sorts, next for that of nature.

You know, next, or except for that of waking up early, still that of red, blue and green, for next that of a still a cup of coffee.

Prick, prick, and next also such a thing for that of a nose as well, for that of having fun, or perhaps making a bit of fun, with next that of science in mind.

"I came, I saw, and next if left", for that of possibly "believe" as well, and next in the words of Julius Caesar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brontosaurus

Wish you a happy one, except for not any such wish either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism

Pull your hat, or perhaps even your sleeves either.

The worst thing that could happen with your life, is that of broken pieces, next for that of your mind.

But next pull youself together, for perhaps not any Superman either, or even Juggernaut.

If God, as our Master, or perhaps "Supreme Being, made it that of both Cremation, or even a furnace of sorts, I would be surprised.

Pick words, and next also randomness as well, except for not making it any "Truth" at all.

Like causal, for that of randomness as well, do we next pick the Laws of nature only by pure chance, by next thinking that it could perhaps be such Laws?

Or, by means of a Principle only, do we next assume God for such a thing, only because it could be pure or random chance?

Think of a wave as next a bottom or two, and next a top.

For this, also a chance as well, if not any "Raise a sail" either.

Entering the shop of a vendor in that of diamonds, and perhaps a pure thing as well, including a trait,
except for perhaps "already told".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_replacement_algorithm#Second-chance

Or perhaps leftover, rather than still believing, or perhaps preserved.

Here, lost it again.

The poinr is that if God for some reason left a trace behind, I could be just silly.

Any point, or perhaps reason of making it perhaps Creation myth as well, except for not any includong, or excluding?

Oops. but 2 * 3 = 5 (still)

Pardon me.

What is sillyness, or even that of stupideness, next for that of a measure?

Perhaps that of the Wise Man, except for not any stupendouus either.

clevermess

wisdom

shrewdness

bonkers

Tellltale, or tell-tale, and next also tell a tale as well, for that of "is", and next also "means".

Next, also such a thing by God as well, because it could be about possible Wisdom.
ID: 1933496 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1933499 - Posted: 4 May 2018, 5:01:47 UTC
Last modified: 4 May 2018, 5:07:07 UTC

Something which is not being fixed, as of really yet, or perhaps now, is my browsing tab, or really surfing habits.

Tell-a-tale, and next that of nature's superiority, or perhaps superbness, next to that of something else.

I do not like the word superbness here, because perhaps getting off short.

Getting back to it.

Funny, but exeept for perhaps not any dirty white either, also that green could still be the color of nature.

Oh, perhaps the secret, if not such a thing for perhaps what it could be told, or in fact, or really is,
namely nature itself, or on its own.

Translates into that of "dumping candidate" of sorts, and here needs checking,
because here late in the night, I am not really sure if perhaps Creation itself is to blame.

More edit perhaps, or next to come.
ID: 1933499 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1933538 - Posted: 4 May 2018, 12:31:46 UTC
Last modified: 4 May 2018, 12:32:59 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXCkZEpAq7o&list=RDpdihi4q0gtM&index=20

That's life, except for not the pretty woman running in the streets either.

Perhaps I was missing something here, next for that of an important sequence, but except for that, I really do not know.

Or, perhaps it is just because "It is life", and next as usual.

Never mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTb_5oPqCys&list=RDpdihi4q0gtM&index=21

Here it apparently sells, at least for that of contents, and hopefully you could, or might perhaps agree.
ID: 1933538 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1933800 - Posted: 5 May 2018, 11:47:13 UTC
Last modified: 5 May 2018, 12:10:53 UTC

Did I say something, or is it perhaps the falling RAC right now.

But here only to tell about a bit of problem being experienced, namely using sky-map.org .

Navigating away from the page, or perhaps refreshing the page itself, I am losing the place being visited, and once again back at the Andromeda galaxy as the starting point.

Almost not to believe here, and needs a fix sooner rather than later.
ID: 1933800 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1933830 - Posted: 5 May 2018, 15:50:23 UTC
Last modified: 5 May 2018, 16:09:04 UTC

I see Phud Redux had a little more to add for that of his heart attack, and feeling with him, of course.

Should tell that it got a bit worse here as well, with my own health.

It is perhaps not any cancer, and next not any sore throat either, but the left arm is at least numb, with the hand halfway paralyzed,
making writing more difficult, because needing the left arm more for this.

Also nerves being part of the body as well, and I am not familiar with deceases for this.

Becomes easy that of nerve agents instead, for that of forgetting the subject itself.

I am not at YouTube early in the day, but when having contents played back, at least listening in.

We could always have a debate for a couple of things, except for both dismissing and also accepting at times, that things could actually be true.

So, while the one being noticed ended a bit back, I am now some 100 million years into the future, for next still Grand Canyon.

Also "World War A, When Aliens attack", at the right in the menu, and I could go there next.

Always the phrase "We built the city", but when using Google Maps, and next for both cities, and almost people as well, a quite good sign that we could be still be part of nature,
as an evolved species, or perhaps race.

Perhaps not the best word either above.

Therefore also recycling at times as well, where food is coming from both grain and fish, and the waste next ends back in the sea.

So while there also could be a different story around, a guess could also be made of the whole thing being perhaps a prefabricated story, rather than perhaps for real.

That rather is meant when making it Grand Canyon, because there should be no point of dismissing such a fact in the same way also doing with that of odds for that of survival,
or only rolling a couple of dices.

Making it rather "Timeless fashion", and also a bit of a soar moment as well, but only lasting a short while.

If not any cancer, inflammation, or even a heart attack, only keeping your breath too long, or diving without air, and next it could be a quick end of at least life,
except for not giving a thought about it perhaps being even more, or better.

I also made it "soar throat as well", and at least catching it here.

Did I perhaps make it a naked body lying on a table, or perhaps a hard landing in a city street (Vilnius, Lithuania) for that of a possible Type I civilization,
except for perhaps not even a Dyson sphere which could be hiding a Type II civilization, or perhaps for not the fact that both insults or at least different opinions,
could be around for both proving, as well as also disproving, for that of sometimes claim versus counterclaim.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lrfr06Sj3vQ

I gave a thought about time being almost infinite as well, but also could be quantized as well, like also that of the Planck constant, for that of distances or scale.

Not finding "quantisizable" when searching, and also the red dot below the word, so here cutting it off a little.

Making it true for that of false, and also the opposite, and next back to Logic, which could also make Proofs out of facts as well, if not telling about ourselves.

Believe it or not, but perhaps still not such a thing as any "flat science" either, for next the fact that there could be some 200 billion stars only in the Milky Way,
and also some 500 billion galaxies scattered or spread, across the whole Universe.

Thinking about my father for that of short note, also that he could have been neglected for a possible suffering being experienced, namely Parkinson's decease.

In my country churches are quite many around, and also at quite distinctive locations as well, including hills or heights, where that of the slopes could be the graveyards for
deceased people.

Here something with my national broadcaster about therapies for genetic deceases, which could be having an adverse effect, or working the opposite way as they should.

The reason why we could be having a naked body for next us to show, is perhaps not about any drillling of holes either, for also that of a bit of headache,
but only that there could be still questions around for that of why I am still sitting here, like also Grand Canyon as well, for at least possible Existence.

If still both a hill, or even a slope as well, next that both Einstein and Bohr would probably avoid such places, except for also passing away, when getting old of age.

The silly question of why you perhaps are reading a newspaper for next only the news, should not be the same as having a couple of answers sometimes coming back,
for next also that of a scientific debate being possible.

The video gives mentioning of 51 Pegasi b, for that of a place in the celestial sky which possibly could be having life on its own, and here the word for this is "exoplanets".

In the news also that of volcanism happening on the Hawaii islands right now, (or just Hawaii), with also a quite strong quake as well (6.9 on the Richter scale).

We know that both mathematicians and physicists could be having their own terminologies for dealing with their respective subjects, except for sometimes almost the same.

Therefore perhaps no such thing as "Proof" only, when it comes to that of such a thing for next billions of stars, and also galaxies as well,
and we should rather be dealing with facts, and also what could be visible for next also eyes being able to see.

But still the difference between science and Religion, next for that of "thinking" as well, if perhaps not making it any Philosophy either.

Making it rather different levels of energy, for that of both production and consumption, and you could still be back at nature, for that of elementary basics,
if perhaps even not any physics involved, including that of nuclear fusion.

If Einstein could make it a notion of time, also that of possible time travelers as well, which we also could be "Contactees", or the like, when we next could make it only
humans for such a thing (ordinary people), except for those having a bad temper, and next deciding that the plug should be made on the interview in progress.

If a soul could be part of every living thing, what is next its appearance, or properties, except for perhaps not being only energy alone?

Theoretically we could make it just matter, energy, and gravity for almost everything, except for not such a thing as a smile, or even a cry.

If rather a priest yourself, you could be there for delivering a message, if not being an open hand for something else as well, which could be possible.

Here it fell out again for that of a better wording.

Make it just intelligence for also that of extraterrestrial intelligence, and we could be still having geniuses around, except for not any fools either.

Like Crop Circles, also that of the Shroud of Turin as well, which to some people could symbolize God, or at least Jesus Christ, for its possible meaning.

Being sometimes a genius, and you could also be having a sharp mind as well, next for that of intelligence being possible, and still only nerves, and nerve cells,
for next that of neurons, for such a thing, maknig up the human brain.

Making it both "perfect" numbers, and also the opposite as well, next perhaps not any meaning either, in that we could perhaps make it the "Big Bang",
for that of Creation itself, or perhaps the Initial moment, for such a thing, except for making it any random or coincidental event either,
for that of the whole thing.

If not wrong, Creation should at least mean Matter Creation, because scientists could find it hard to define a possible Creator, for the reason behind,
and next that Religion should come before Philosophy, when next making a couple of thoughts.

If perhaps still sharp of sorts, also that Dark Matter should not be the same as any Dark Force either, for next that of Heaven and Hell, which could be possible.

If such a thing as gods, or even heathen, or pagan, for also that of angels, is not possible, from a scientific point of view, perhaps at least extraterrestrials should be
such a thing, for also their ideas and thoughts, making up their sometimes intellectual mind.

Or perhaps still "hide and seek" only, for next neurons versus neutrons, and also the difference, in that Matter Creation should be the way the Big Bang could be explained,
and not the opposite way.

"Prove" a Proof, and next still both true and false for that of Logic, because such a thing at least should be telling a given truth.

Make it rather Mona Lisa, and perhaps a falsification only, except for only a smile, or even not believing in the whole thing.

As an example, Polaris, or Pole star, is not precisely at the celestial north pole either, but rather a bit away, in the same way as Aldebaran (alpha Tauri),
could be making for a bit of surprise when it comes to its actual size.

As usual, a hat, could be for that of wearing, except for not a story being told which could be for that of your ears as well, or even knocking you to the ground.

Being able to make it a "truth" on its own, this is only possible because you could be making it a lie, for that of the opposite, next with both that of Logic in mind.

Therefore also the same for not making God any left handed either, when he rather could be still right handed, and showing that we could be taking our presence for granted,
like also that of the Universe itself.

The only reason why you sometimes could overrule a decision, is because you could be a moderator, or perhaps rather a judge.

Determinism could still be part of nature, in the same way as also a bit of nonsense for that of a debate, except for not making it any randmoness, or chaos either.

Do you happen to be a priest and next also here as well, except for not any such thing either, but rather that it could be sometimes "Wonders of nature",
while still up to the profession of scientist, in order to explain such a thing.

Or perhaps experts, for that of expertise instead, because we supposedly could "believe" in scientists, for next a couple of facts.

Perhpps still the little man, for also regular or ordinary man as well, including the "Man in the Street", but also "Little Green Men" as well, for a slightly different notion.

Therefore, God could be still God, at least for a priest, but perhaps for not any agnostics, or atheists either, and also that of Monotheism, which could be the underlying factor,
for that of any such thinking.

Could perhaps God be explained, only because there could be also nature around, which is now giving away its secrets, for that of research being carried out?

If perhaps Creation myth rather than Matter Creation, next still part of science, at least you could be taking God for granted, only because of the subject itself.

Forget the dictionary, for both words, adjectives, and also syllables, in that at least words being used could explain a couple of things,
except for not any possible "Miracles" either, which could be easily explained, if not taken for granted at times.

Perhaps a miracle itself in the birth of a child, except for still molecules for that of cells, and next that of atoms, for that of molecules.

Living here on Earth, and I could still be part of space as well, for next the Universe, where also galaxies could be isolated islands of matter, energy, and gravity,
for next that of emptiness in between.

The isolated spot when using sky-map.org, could be replaced with that of the Hubble Deep Field, or Hubble Very Deep Field, for next still that of both stars and galaxies.

Making it rather the Mandelbrot set, or perhaps Julia set instead, and this only because of the notion of infinity possible, which could also be telling about endless space.

Being quite good at it, I still can not factorize a 200 digit number into two 100 digit prime factors, but only showing that it could be possible.

For that of making a payment, and using the envelope for such a thing, perhaps no stamp needed, but rather a tongue for that of sticky, or adhesive tape instead.

But if rather making it numbers, it could be shown that it mostly is related, except for not always able to make such a thing clear or visible.

Therefore, perhaps not any Determinism either, but only the fact that you sometimes could be making it "Laws and Equations", where it still could be only randomness and chaos.

Here having some fun with the spinning or rotating wheel earlier on, except for not making it any Ezekiel either, for that of "Wheels inside wheels".

The Butterfly Effect could be part of even more, or something else, like also that of numbers for that of infinity, if perhaps not rather the Mandelbrot set.

Always a difference between a stupid fool and a genius, but for that of energy, we could still make it both production and consumption,
except for not also different levels for such a thing.

The only reason you could make it both circles and rectangles, are that we could be having both, but next not directly related with each other, for that of a reference.

Or to be more specific, the reason why you could be having a visitor in your bedroom at night, is because for that of also dreaming, except for not any "knock-knock",
either and next a science which could be going nowhere, for that of a lack of sufficient Proof.

Should an explanation be found on the cover of a book, or perhaps back side, or do you still have to open it up, for that of its answers?

In the Bible we could be having the Revelation of John, except for perhaps not a book itself, or even a miracle itself, or perhaps on its own.

Should I perhaps believe in the Bible, for that of its words, or could I still make it "Blasphemy", for next that of science only, or perhaps for its word?

You definitely could be a priest, and next I could also "believe" as well, for that of a story which could be told, except for still only that of elementary particles,
for that of also the Fundamental Laws of nature, making up "Interaction", for still that of science being the main reason behind.

If not any species, perhaps beings instead, for also that of alien beings, in that we could also be dealing with "entities" for such a thing, except not any databases either.

Like jumping the paradise when being a child, also that of a playing room as well, where you could be pulling the trigger with your fingers, for next that of the jumping steel bar,
and the bars jumping back and forth when being hit.

Here you have an example of randomness and chaos, where a thing is perhaps not predictable at all, but rather could be having an unpredictable outcome,
leaving nothing decided for that of result.

Unfortunately pulling the trigger against your head could give you a 50/50 % chance, except for not any "Man in the moon" either.

Perhaps believing in a better world, you also could be making it science as well, if not any Heaven and Hell either, for that of taking the bus the wrong way,
and ending up at the restaurant uphill, before eventually returning back to center of town.

You know, by listening in, also that evolution could be also telling about the notion of time, except for not any "Parallelism" either, or the similar.

Both Rembrandt and Picasso perhaps "knew" what they made, when next making up their respective paintings, but for that of still the Universe,
we could still need different, or at least several, or more Proofs, for that of also making a possible conclusion.

Here that of Pluralism comes to mind, in that I still could make it "E" only on my pocket calculator, when infinity could perhaps be a different word for that of the singularity,
or maybe vice versa.

Here for that of a "construct" of nature, including the way it possibly could be explained.

Like meaning, also meaningless as well, and in a similar way, also that of Reason, for next also meaning as well.

Perhaps almost my shoes on the shelf right now, for that of my poor health, but next perhaps no visitor in my bedroom either, for also that of a priest as well.

Should science be the "tool", or perhaps way being used for that of "proving" God, only because it could be about Existence as well, and next perhaps not only the priest either?

Or should it rather be for that of "In the beginning ...", where next God created both the Earth and the Universe in just seven days, and we next forgot about both the
weekend holiday, as well as also the time it took to come up with the whole thing.

Like still the "Man in the Moon", and also Man in the Street as well, we could be also making it "flat science", for next that of a flat Earth, except for not proving it either.

Please, be a priest if you will, and next pay me a visit, only because you are able to preach, and next about Heaven, for that of also God.

But next proving it, for that of perhaps the Scientific Method, and next "no, no" for such a thing, only because it could be still science.

Honestly, blasphemy should be still about such a thing, except for not making it any Religion either, for next that of both Heaven and Hell,
in a similar way as also being a priest, for next that of preaching your favorite subject.

In comparison, an atom of Cesium, one of the periidic elements, is known for its crystalline structure, making for a preciseness being used in atomic watches.

Here that of a precise measure, for that of also precision making up nature, except for not the opposite either, which could be telling a different thing.

For this, also that of Design, when it rather could be about Creation, and next also a bit of surprise when coming across this the first time.

Here it becomes that of Intelligent Design above, and next also the question about a divine Creator being the reason for everything, including Existence.

Mentioned before, and also that of a door in a cabin for that of a plane, except for not any black or white for that of colors, and next that the color of green
could also be making the Strong Force possible, except for not any Electromagnetism, or even Weak Nuclear Force either.

Here also the contradiction on its own, that there could be a story around, and next also being told, which could next be almost a secret as well.

Why such a thing for that of both secrecy and openness, when our purpose could perhaps be that of exploring the Universe for both its details,
and also the meaning of it all?

You never know, but it could still be the open door of sorts, except for not any free fall either, for next that of falling.
ID: 1933830 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1933832 - Posted: 5 May 2018, 16:27:27 UTC
Last modified: 5 May 2018, 17:02:54 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AUA7XS0TvA

But only after posting the previous, for still that of a glass of milk being part of the regular day.
ID: 1933832 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935208 - Posted: 11 May 2018, 20:14:32 UTC
Last modified: 11 May 2018, 20:30:36 UTC

Still both the tablet with milk as an added product, except for also struggling a bit with the eyesight.

Forgot the coffee at the shop once again, but returning back to a television program about Albert Einstein with my national broadcaster,
and here the second channel.

Except for one detail related to the actor being used in order to give the visual appearance, or portray the scientist,
the program was quite good, and once again a reminder of a space which perhaps is not empty at all.

Again not forgetting that I rather should be here for something else, but also no secret between laughing and next crying for a couple of things.

I will get back at it later on.

In short, the equation being written on a blackboard should be that of General Theory, where the "=" sign next should separate a thought "abstract" at the left,
for that of real space, including both matter and gravity, at the right.

Also noticing that it may have been lying on the shelf for some time, by lacking the recent discovery about gravity waves, or perhaps gravitational waves.

I had a bit of cleanup again before sitting down this evening, but also that the chicken bone ending up in your stomach, should not be the same as clean water from the sink.

If it is true that Einstein perhaps was not the best of mathematicians, also a thought should be given about the subject of Logic as well, in that it could make a difference between people,
and also the way things could be interpreted by scientists.

So therefore no exam right now, for that of looking down into papers in front of you, and next using your mind for that of coming up with a couple of ideas.

Or perhaps concentrate, if this did not readily show up.

If I happened to be a member of an orchestra, or perhaps band, still up in the morning, but sometimes I could be showing my cleverness.

Except for not saying "oh" at times either, and here not necessarily for that of betreger either.

Guess it still could be a wonderous morning, if perhaps not any wonderous stories either, but it could be still early morning at times.

I need to check a bit of spelling before finish, but also that of a lie for also that of a liar comes to mind, because this should also be about Logic.

It definitely is true that you are what you eat, and for the same reason still the Universe, except for a couple of missing details.

Anyway, so here you are in an elevator, rather than having two lightning strikes at the same time, on opposite sides of you.

Rather you have the speeding train passing you, next at close at speed, and the conductor could be wearing a shirt, and also quite pretty as well,
except for also "Relativistic effects" possible.

Forget the discussion, except for not any "hide and seek" either, next for the fact is what you could also make it, with its intrinsic details, for that of everything,
and that we could be sometimes naive for that of possible thinking.

Always the skeptic, like also the believer, while a scientist could still quantisize the Universe for that of the way it is supposed to work.
like also the possible options possible.

Remember that Einsten is as far away from Newton, as the latter is from Euclid, when making it "General Law of Theory", when it more should be about the Universe.

But next that comprehension should rather be about painting a picture, rather than such a thing as Logic, in order to do the same.

Here again a reminder, if not becoming either, about a journey to the Moon, for that of a space travel in the past, not because it is easy, but rather hard.

This only because of the Force of gravity, which still leaves us mostly bound, or grounded to the Earth, for that of living.

Here checking for that of "wondrous" first, for that of wondrous stories and suggestions welcome.

Back to the lift, for that of the elevator, and it could be about acceleration, and here gravity as well, except for not any elevator in space either,
for that of such a thing.

Make it rather a stop, and next a free fall back to Earth, and you could be floating in the air, rather than having your feet on the ground, at least for still standing.

But rather still searching, next looking as well, and we could also make it a couple of billion stars and galaxies, next for that of ourselves,
and still only rely in the subject of Logic.

Definitely famous equations at times, if not any equations which could be explaining the Laws of gravity either.

Here the other word pops up right now, which is nice, namely that of "construct".

Here still Madonna (the artist), for that of "I am your prayer", if not "Like a Virgin" either, except for perhaps not "Singing in the Rain", using an umbrella either.

Here one of the Commandments of the Old Testament is telling that there should be no other gods, and for this we could also be having that of Monotheism.

But simply speaking, both colors, like also gravity as well, which could be making up the Forces of nature, and next also your way of living, for that of daily life.

Did I make a couple of thoughts where it all started, namely by that of the Big Bang?

We next could choose to make it one Theory for another, for that of perhaps leaving the Steady State Theory alone,
but also that we could make it still a difference between science and Religion, except for not any flawed thinking,
for that of incorrect conclusions either.

Here an elephant for never forgetting, except for still both moralists, and also believers, who next could make it perhaps Monotheism a better way of "belief",
if perhaps not any science either, for that of sometimes flawed thinking, or even lack of conclusions, for that of also sometimes evidence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence

Make it rather a competition, if not running at any speed either, but if you happen to be a Moralist, you could also make it Heaven and Hell as well,
except for sometimes being rather a scientist. next thinking that the Universe came into being as a result of Matter Creation.

But if you happen to be still a believer, also that of a "heavy hand" of sorts for such a thing, who perhaps did not bother about such a thing as any morality,
or even such a thing as "Heaven and Hell".

But still Matter Creation, for next that of matter itself.

The fact is that we could make it both easy and cheap, if perhaps not any naive either, for next that of a handshake between a human and an alien,
or even a President, if not anything else, except for also "Delicate sound of Thunder" at times, and next also making it "Constructs".

Take the programming language Java as an example, where a quite delightful figure ended up with both result and usability having both its pros and cons.

Except for perhaps no such things as any elementary particles, Equations, or even Forces of nature, for that of nature itself,
we could also be left with a naked body lying on a table, if perhaps not any "Alien Interview" either, where it also could be a Dyson sphere,
or perhaps even more.

Perhaps both you and me for that of persons, or even people, but also that nature could be "impersonal" for that of its intended meaning, or purpose.

We could also make it intentional versus unintentional as well, for also that of "Reason versus meaning", but here I rather could wait a little,

Here that of a mentioning of the perturbation of the orbit of the planet Mercury around the sun (43 arcesonds per century), for that of a different Universe,
but here rather flip a couple of notes, next for that of papers as well, in next thinking that you could have discovered, or come across
"Fundamental Laws of nature", for such a thing, which next ends up becoming General Theory of Relativity.

If the real answer could next be hiding in the shadows, next for also us to know, why not so for the problem which rather should be at hand?

"I sense a disturbance in the Force", and next I could be a peanut farmer becoming a President, and next also believe that I could be seeing something.

Needs checking, but here a sense that "Credibility" itself should be about the subject of Logic, and next perhaps also back at the Laws of nature as well.

Here just or only a car, in the program being watched, and next an atomic watch spending a weekend in the mountains, for next being compared with a stand alone clock,
left alone in an office.

Here either 18 or 20 nanoseconds, do not recall, or catch, but at least it became a bit of freezing cold.

But also a quite good computer at my disposal, but does this next perhaps tell about myself?

If only a short vacation should be telling about a difference, if perhaps not any variability, or variance either, what does such a thing tell about properties of nature?

Uh, oh, funny feeling, except for perhaps not little humans, for next also small as well, still living on this Earth, except for perhaps not the same said about any green ones as well,
for that of "Little Green Men".

Really, it is still back in my head, if perhaps not mind, that "curiosity killed the cat", except for not any stupidity either.

Preach, and next the Bible as well, and you could be preaching nonsesense.

In a similar way, perhaps not the story about ourselves either, but rather the Universe, for that of its inner working, and also functionality.

So here perhaps no such thing as greed for that of leaving school either, except perhaps rather sillyness, or being forgetful, next for that of insomnia as well.

Ask Deputy Commander Charles I. Halt how strong he made his liqour, by next also pouring salt, if not any water, and you next could see that the story lies
(and is not lying) on the fact of a basic foundation, where that of its details could also be told.

Both Newton and Einstein were definitely both geniuses, but perhaps not any ufologists either.

My guess is that Bernie Vine here could be making a laugh of me, for that of a crazy guess of at least believing in such a thing as aliens,
if not in fact actually doing so.

If perhaps so, I next still could choose to give science a more general hand, from also such a point of perspective, by next also making it a debate of science versus Religion.

If God, for that of a given entity, perhaps divine, could be the Creator of the Universe, next also perhaps infinity as well, next for that of a "Construct".

For this, you perhaps did not need a lab, or laboratory either, except for perhaps not such thing as Heaven and Hell either, being part of Creation myth.

This means of course that God could still be past, or beyond our comprehension, as only humans only, because our way of understanding,
including sometimes depicting the word, should not be the same, or perhaps match the power in his hands.

For this, perhaps matter still out of nothing, and next also a sledgehammer as well, in order to make it possible.

If you look at the Laws or Equations for that of randomness, or Chaos, which Laws, except for those forces of Creation, should next be making it all possible?

The funny thing is that we could believe in a famous Equation, if perhaps not the Laws of General Theory of Relativity either, which could be explaining much the same.

You perhaps do not see a President either, for that of a red light, and next also waiting in the queue, but also the handshake as well, which could be telling about a thing possible.

Eat sand, but at PrimeGrid we could be having that of a conjecture, for that of numbers,

But next also sometimes where a couple of things could belong as well, except for not making it the Butterfly effect versus an iceberg, or mountain either.

Make it rather a wishful dream, and next also a handshake as well, if perhaps no such a thing as being told that there perhaps might not be any aliens or extraterrestrials at all.
ID: 1935208 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935210 - Posted: 11 May 2018, 20:36:30 UTC
Last modified: 11 May 2018, 20:40:08 UTC

I do not have the vertical box at the right all the time when both posting, and also reading as well.

Back to Internet Explorer 11 from Google Chrome, and the text search feature in the first,
(Ctrl-F, or Ctrl+F) once again, is a bit different than the latter option, and I could be running a bit around for that of also using my fingers.

Guess what, but editing of text could be an awkward thing to do at times.

Here the secret lies in the way it possibly could be done, and I am asking the developers for a possible fix here, in order to make it more simple.

Thanks!
ID: 1935210 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935534 - Posted: 13 May 2018, 20:24:31 UTC
Last modified: 13 May 2018, 21:19:54 UTC

I will be 55 in four months from now, and because of that, also the health check being introduced for that of a intestine problem among the population.

Pull both the fish and the meat for that of bones, and only the white skeleton left, for also a bit less of matter left.

Both Martin Luther King Jr., if not someone else either could be "having a dream", except for not the notion of death, which could mark the end of a given life.

Here I was "strolling on the Moon" once again, if perhaps not someone else for such a thing, and here it could also become the word "NOT" for that of Logic as well,
in that we still could be left with only ourselves here on Earth, and perhaps also the rest of the Universe as well.

So, except for problems with my eyes, if not any rolling ones either, like "Men in Black", or the similar, also that a couple of recent posts ended up nowhere,
for that of returning back to an empty page for that of the buffer.

Blame such a thing on technical problems, because here apparently a couple of files became lost again.

We could be on the verge of factorizing a number nicknamed "magic number" right now, only because of such advances, but also that Logic should also be about
the Method of Proof as well, if not just loving the theme either, and next the subject of astronomy, for that of also the celestial sky.

Should it perhaps be ourselves, or should we rather still make it space for that of the Universe, in next seeing is believing, as usual.

Supposedly science could be the tool which could tell us everything, and for the same reason we could also make it Creation, when next speaking about the Universe.

Perhaps more easy to ask the question "Does the Universe exist", for next also space, if not "Does God exist" for much of the same, and still only about Logic.

The reason is that there should not be any reason for throwing out any valuable science for that of science itself, because next also about results and achievements as usual.

My national broadcaster is also having a funny video where a spider is jumping from one small piece to another through the air, only be learning such a thing,
and perhaps not be any taught either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen

While listening to the music in the background, here a Periodic element being part of the Periodic table, is now also a Chemical element as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_element

Supposedly it could still be "Nobody's Fools" as well, except for not any love story either, but make a travel around in the celestial sky, also objects like NGC 488,
which could be almost the same as well, particularly in the late night.

A bit of nice writing in the second paragraph for that of Nitrogen, because here I was always thinking about the physical part of it, and not that which could be that of chemistry.

And because of that, you are not supposed to be living in a fake world either, for that of aspects, constructs, or even dogma, being words sometimes coming your way.

Remember that neither Ronald Reagan or Mikhail Gorbachev were any strolling around, when opening their diaries in front of each other, and next also making it their day,
for that of also an agenda.

Next I rather could choose to be making it science, because not wrong, both astronauts and presidents could be trusted, and next for also a thing being watched in the sky,
if not witnessed on the Moon either.

But rather that it could be "ufologists" for such a thing, and next also claiming it to be science as well.

Again the red dotted line for not liking the word in the translation,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature

Here also nature in a general context as well, if perhaps not any strolling either, becasuse I happen to recall a previous post where I tried making a sense of the "furnace" which sometimes
could be around for that of nuclear fusion, if not still making it that of "Proof" for that of the Scientific Method itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reiki

Sorry to say, but also that the mentioned Reiki should not be the same as any Perception, or even wild dream either, for next also giving a thought of the Universe coming out of nothing,
and next becoming a product of both order and chaos as a result.

The mentioned program with my broadcaster where at least the story became almost correct, and also quite interesting as well, should be a reminder that General Theory of Relativity is not only Newton mechanics, but also is dealing with the properties of space and time.

Or perhaps Newton classical mechanics, for that of a little too long line.

Here a lot of formulas and equations for that of abstract Terminology, if not any symbols either, but here the end is also a famous equation, of course.

Should we believe in the alien presence, also such things as dogmas and constructs as well, but next that it also could be a way of perhaps explaining the Universe.

Therefore also questioning that of possible credibility for that of science, when it also could be for that of ordinary people as well.

Again that atheists could be making a laugh about the notion of God as usual, but really not the intended meaning here.

Make it that of Creation again, and perhaps no reason to question such a thing either, for that of itself, which also could be that of "In the beginning", for much of the same.

Is it perhaps the secret here that scientists perhaps "know" that there is a Creator behind, and next refuses to leave such a thing open, for that of a closed door?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism

Here perhaps a gift again with that of myself, for coming up with that above, and the show could still go on.
ID: 1935534 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935573 - Posted: 13 May 2018, 23:53:58 UTC
Last modified: 14 May 2018, 0:09:37 UTC

This perhaps was meant to say if I also could be mean or sinister, but next after 15 years here, I should know better as well.

Is giving next the same as any forgiving, for that of possible sins, when we also could know about Creation for at least our whereabouts?

Make it still rather the Universe than boots you could be wearing for that of a big downpour, but supposedly Religion is still only Religion,
for next also the same for that of science, in that at least the latter should be the answer, or perhaps way of knowing, for a couple of things.

Here lost the question mark once again, for that of making it a period, and such a thing could happen again.

But like sometimes a Foundation for that of papers which could sometimes be written, also perhaps a basic understanding of the Universe as well,
particularly if you happen to be a scientist, and next also an astronomer as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation

Guess what, but I could sometimes forget a subject for that of another, if perhaps not making it any "Brick in the wall", when it rather should be that of nuclear fusion,
when it also could be that of lying in a grave, for next that of a funeral.

Feeling lucky, and for some reason we could make it "Predictive science", when it rather could be about Climate Prediction, for that of predicting the weather of the future.

Or perhaps rather spinning both forwards and backwards for that of a Torsion effect which sometimes could be possible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion

In order to perhaps grasp or catch the unknown for that of the known, you may sometimes leave no stone untouched, in order for that of a possible answer.

If not wrong, there could be reason to believe that these two subjects, for also disciplines, could be intertwined for that of its relationship or context, if perhaps not any related.

Supposedly we could also make it alien research of sorts as well, in that for at least one thing, we could make it technology, if not any "Mysteries, magic, and miracles" either.

Here you have the Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge (possibly with the name "Gold" as well), if not also making it S9 here, for that of any competition either, except for also that of technology
for that of a possible marvel, in that new things could now be possible.

But still only because we should also know the limits set by those Equations still making up both the world and the Universe.

So, hearing laughter in the audience when it could still be about matter, energy, and the Force of gravity, next for both ourselves, if not still rather the Universe?

But next also both Dark Matter and Dark Energy as well, if not still far way off from that of an understanding of everything,
including a possible GUT (Grand Unified Theory).

Did I make a reference to that of Chemistry earlier on, in that this perhaps is not about any Alchemy either as the subject,
except for such a thing as "Wisdom" either, which could be that of the "Wizard of Oz", or perhaps Merlin for such a thing?

"You are what you eat", but also that I became a bit puzzled, when also knowing that Fundamental Forces of nature should be more that of Physics,
and next also mathematics as well, for that of also explaining nature.

For one thing, we could be left still speculating about the graviton, which should be the particle responsible for gravity.

Something being read that this could be about waves versus elementary particles, except for not a recent discovery of gravity waves either.

Needs checking here, because I do not have the answer here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

Here also that of a hypothetical particle, if not the same for also that of a Dyson sphere, and next perhaps no surprise either.

Here two people speaking different languages, if not a human versus a computer as well, and next also a translator or interpreter needed.

Here still that of both "Yes" and "No" for that of an answer, if not making it any "AND", "OR, or "NOT" for that of Logic,
if rather making it sometimes "flawed" science, for next "you do not know either", for that of an answer.

Express yourself, for sometimes also that of feelings as well, and next you could also be telling about yourself as well, except for also making "Fallacies" one part of science as well,
with its corresponding Terminology included.

Life could be for real, because next also about Existence as well, and for the same reason we could also be making it the grave for an end of a similar Journey,
meaning a travel through life.

Are atheists or agnostics perhaps "stupid" people, only because priests for that of also believers could be the opposite, or maybe vice versa?

Are we similarly willing to discuss the concept for that of the Universe for that of its possible meaning, when only having those different ideas in mind?

If God next created both Heaven and the Earth, for next also the Universe, we could be having Creation myth, if not doing such a thing for that of Matter Creation itself.

For this it became something like a thud versus a clap, if not any thunder or rain either, or perhaps going down the drain for that of a lost post.

Make it science, and it could also be scientific as well, because here reading two times, or twice somewhere else, before my eyes gave it all clear for that of its spelling.

Something like making it ash for that of dust as well, if not any ... either, for that of riding such a pin, because here lost the word.

Should not be confused with Cinderella here, like also Oz for Ozzy Osbourne.

And beware the wolf, perhaps not the same as a notion of Hell either, for that of the lost or forgotten name above.

Same goes with pretend versus "Pretention", in that the Wikipedia is not having any clear article here.

For this also "pretend to be a scientist" as well, if not making it any ufologist either, in that it next perhaps should not be about any love and compassion either,
for next that of the subject of Religion.

Again becoming red dots for that of ufologist above, and here the spelling should be correct.

It comes to me that this should rather or also be about the Paranormal as an issue, but if perhaps so, we could be back into science, once more.

If infinity perhaps is not only about numbers either, but also a couple of ideas and thoughts as well, we could be closer to an understanding.

Supposedly both Charles I. Halt and Steven M. Greer could be spokesmen, or perhaps representatives for their given subjects, but next perhaps not any "Wise men" either.

But rather for that of a nature itself which we could also make the Universe as well, if perhaps still not the weather, and for this also still a notion of "Heaven and Hell".

Here that of a thud and clap once again, in that a stone which could be lying around, may not be having any particular shape, and therefore also not any
definitions either, for that of its properties.

Reminds me a bit about that of Object Oriented Programming, if perhaps not still that of Set Theory either.

Are you willing to question that of stupid people versus that of also a bit of thunder and lightning, when also Logic could be doing the same for that of a given way of thinking?

In a similar way, when making it an idea, for next also ideas, it could also be philosophy as well, but next that we should know about this as being a subject on its own.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhetoric

Here the mentioned Rhetoric as well, if perhaps not the best or most proper either.

I mentioned before that if perhaps God should be the reason for both Creation and Existence, it could be with a heavy hand for such, except for not dealt a heavy blow either.

Sometimes you could have both fish and meat for that of a dinner, if not making it any apples or oranges either, except for not making the milk bittersweet either.

Make such a thing for that of possible Creation, and perhaps not for any bad taste either, for next also a given sense, or perhaps feeling,
if perhaps still not such a thing as love and compassion either.

You know, Love from God is the melody which could be sung at the grave, only because God itself should be about a belief as a notion.

If or when making it still both Heaven and Hell, like also a couple of other things, I know that a couple ot things do not match or fit,
and therefore it could be perhaps a reason "not" to believe, rather than perhaps believe.

For one reason, perhaps no such thing as believing in any gods and angels either, because you could be an Agnostic, or Atheist,
but except for that, perhaps different notions or concepts for what actually is being meant, for such a thing.

Here that of infinity versus Supreme Being as a good example, in that infinity could be at least a mathematical context, if perhaps no such thing as any God either,
who could be responsible for everything, including Creation itself.

Here actually getting it correct this time, but had to check once again.

But also that it becomes that of completeness versus incompleteness as well, in that we may not be having all the answers, for also details.

Make it rather that of numbers, and mostly everything should be prime numbers, except for both 2, 4, and also 0 and 1, for next also zero, nil, or nothing.

Also those fine words of "construct", "dogma", if not any "aspect" or "aspects" either, which could be those words from either an alien species,
or perhaps a representative or spokesman for that of nature itself.

But also that we could be back at flaws versus Fallacies, in that it could also be "Fundamental flaws" as well, and next sometimes for that of given thinking as well.

If perhaps rather the ashtray for that of both ash and also furnace as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lf8WnYc28DU&index=26&list=RDzHalXjs0cDA

Little angel, because here pretty for that of the music itself, except for not any story either.

But here also that of a cyclical loop, if not any repeating occurrence either, for next also spinning around, in that time could be moving both backwards and forwards,
and sometimes be speeding up as well, if not moving any slower either.

And perhaps not any fire either, for that of the opposite, because here it became Greek science in the past, for that of earth, wind, soil, and fire,
if not making it any nuclear furnace either for that of also stupid people who next could also "believe" in a given world.

As usual, dinner is served, if not making it infinity either, for that of the observable Universe, for next what we could be able to see.

Here either 78 billion, or 91 billion light years for that of its size, and next some 13.8 or 13.9 billion years for its age, and again something is not right.

The old story goes with that of 28 being sometimes a perfect number, if not P39 = 170141183460469231731687303715884105727 for much the same thing.

Except for perhaps not any mathematical discussion either, we know from the past where it all started, namely with a push of a button (this project),
for that of also the gaussian curve as well, if not any distribution for such either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial

Here that of "spin, span, spun", except for not any naked lady for such a thing either, and using a ball of yarn for such a thing, or at least keeping away from cold.

But rather that the Universe could be intertwined for that of its complexity, only because there could be both numbers and constants involved,
if not rather putting a finger on the subject of aliens and extraterrestrials, in the hope or perhaps wish, that we perhaps are not alone.

Should Logic perhaps be a subset of Fallibles, or Fallabilities, in that there sometimes could be no reason to believe, except for making it Religion for such a thing.

Also that I am having a bit of problems with its spelling, and it next could become wrong.

Much like that of Constructs, it could be a way of wording, if not any words, for sometimes making it science, where it perhaps should be Religion,
or vice versa, because at times really hard to tell.

Look back at the mentioned Nitrogen, for that of a Chemical element, where it also could be an atom as well, and part of, or belonging to the Periodic table.

Next water for that of ice as well, and perhaps still science, rather than perhaps both physics and chemistry for the same thing.

Make it perhaps rather a 8 through 12 digit gaussian score for that of a Seti@home result, or perhaps score, and at least we could know that nature could be intelligent,
and next also having intelligence on its own.

Make it rather still constructs, and perhaps also science as well, in that we could always know that God should be about love and compassion,
if perhaps not any preaching either.

It becomes a sense of perhaps not "mirror on the wall" either, for sometimes seeing the whole for rather only part, and next also for parts as well.

Here that of Heissenberg for such a thing, in that of thinking that nature could be about part versus whole, except for not any infinity either.

If both Matter Creation and Creation myth could be two parts of the same thing, also that of a "cubit" as well for the same thing.

But here "I love science", except for not "I love Lucy" either, for next rather the Lucy show, for that of a gorilla, or maybe chimpanzee, but next another story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubit

Almost there, if not any phrases or wording which could be used for that of speaking backwards, if not any empty phrase either.

Also translates into floskel, platitude, and cliché here.

Here because we next could perhaps still believe in God as the reason for everything, and next also Creation as well.

Perhaps one more piece of chicken for dinner before having the final cup of coffee, because here the cake also became so, namely eaten.
ID: 1935573 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935657 - Posted: 14 May 2018, 14:22:19 UTC
Last modified: 14 May 2018, 14:30:04 UTC

Perhaps a little long in the previous, and do not forget my stuck fingers either.

Here at least that of manifold, if not making it any "space and time" either, for next also a YouTube video you could be watching.

"Too good to be true", and either it becomes that of Perception for such a thing, if still not leaving it with that of Belief, if not any Logic either,
when perhaps making it a flat or tabletop mountain, for next also a close encounter being possible, and visible in the sky.

Either it becomes that of believing in your senses once again, which becomes that of Perception once again, or maybe science could be having just an excuse,
when next telling one thing for another, and also claiming it to be true.

Next becomes that of Apparitions again, if not any lightning spheres or orbs visible, which also could be having colors as well.

But next also a natural phenomena perhaps, and in all of this, where perhaps such a thing as any intelligence, for also extraterrestrial intelligence?

Is it still perhaps the excuse around, for that of making it science, when it rather could be something else, and if perhaps so, should it next be Religion?

You are welcome if you happen to be an Atheist, or Agnostic, but next that it could also be stars and stripes as usual, if not making it any planets either,
for that of also elementary particles, together with their respective Equations.

Here getting a sense that perhaps proving a natural phenomena could be one thing, while doing so with respect to Religious or Theological thinking,
could be a somewhat different thing.

Next, "dismissed", if not making it any Analytical for that of a subject, and here that of Torsion as an example, but we still do not have any "Method of Proof",
for that of Religious thinking, except for rather making it luminous objects visible in the sky, and either ourselves to blame, if not any science either,
for just such a thing.

We could be asking ourselves the question about that of intelligence involved, for even a natural phenomenon, while also making it almost physical objects for a
couple of things which could be visible.

My guess is that intelligence is part of nature, in a more or less common or general sense, by only looking at ourselves, and also evolution,
if not making it any physical Laws either, or perhaps Equations, telling about the inner workings of the Universe.

So therefore about Logic as well, including the Method of Proof itself, when we sometimes could be missing a couple of facts, next because of a given attitude.

Possibly we are forgetting that it could be nature itself setting the limits or constraints, if not any possibilities either, next for also an understanding,
and for this perhaps not only about Religion either.

Perhaps not any implied either, but rather dedicated, where you sometimes could be using the hammer repeatedly, if not any striving either,
but here a particular name for such a thing, which I do not have.

One thing is taking things for granted, if not making any conclusions in advance either, but it could still be the hammer (and not Hammer and Feather),
because one thing we could do, is taking science for granted at times, for what it supposedly could also be.

It becomes much like "staying on target", if not any sticking with principles either, because perhaps no such thing as any Methodology,
when it comes to that of Ufology either.

Again the red dotted line for that of ufologists above, and here perhaps not any wrong with the spelling either.

So therefore perhaps not any "Little Green Man" for that of Steven Spielberg himself, but also mentioning in the past that it could be almost like looking at the "real thing",
when next making it a tabletop mountain in the flat landscape, and also a close encounter being possible.

Is science supposed to sell, because it next could be forgiving, if not any telling either?

Here perhaps "bid", if not any "What are you bidding, my Master", except for perhaps not any science fiction out of a movie either.

The fact is that at least we could "prove" the Universe itself, using both Laws and Equations for such a thing, if not making it any "Belief" either, for that of Religion.

Making it perhaps still Mona Lisa for such a thing, and at least she could smile, if not making it any "falsification" for that of a possible way of interpretation or guesswork.

If rather Einstein riding a bicycle, at least he could be wearing white hair, if perhaps not any old of age either, but rather that he still was "thinking" physicist,
rather than perhaps not the mathematical expert, or genius either.

We still could be dealing with the same old thing, namely that scientists, for that of also science, could give a better explanation for a couple of things,
rather than perhaps the "Man in the street", for the silly or stupid idiot he perhaps could be.

Here that of tuft, for also tufting, and again it falls out of my head by just checking for that of the translation, but perhaps tufting by means of experience,
if not any laurels, could be such a thing.

Here such words as glorification, extol, or aggrandizement, for at least a couple of words, except for perhaps not an explanation of actual facts either,
when it comes to properties of space, including those Laws and Equations which could be behind.

Make it a given Hell, and next also a notion of such a thing, because of words like perdition, or damnation, if it still could rather be that of Heaven,
for that of Love from God, for such a thing, including possible salvation, and next still only words for this, except for not any "time will tell" either.

So, are gods and angels next part of the Universe because of Creation itself, only because we could be making it Creation myth,
or should we rather believe in a divine Creator for such a thing, meaning that of Existence, and also Reason behind?

Or perhaps rather "tick-tick" for such thing, in that it could be the notion of time for such a thing, but still that we also could make it both gods and angels,
next for that of Creation.

Hanging computer right now, so back later.
ID: 1935657 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935676 - Posted: 14 May 2018, 18:04:17 UTC
Last modified: 14 May 2018, 18:05:52 UTC

Having the large window for the posting buffer in front of me , and my wish could be having one more blank line at the bottom when next posting.

Making a cut and paste for that of linking of text becomes a bit difficult with the current setting, and if adding one more line at the bottom, it could be more easy to deal with.

Thanks!
ID: 1935676 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935706 - Posted: 14 May 2018, 20:36:35 UTC
Last modified: 14 May 2018, 20:46:58 UTC

https://mathoverflow.net/questions/62925/philosophical-question-related-to-largest-known-primes

Here really for that of another discussion, because here also sometimes users and groups as well, for that of number crunching.

I am giving a bit of thought of whether perhaps Philosophy could still be the better thing, and next also for that of science.

My regular phrase for this, which perhaps could be left out, but except for perhaps no such thing as obscenity, for also that of immorality,
we could be still left with the question of whether we still are alone.

The use of drones was most recently as an example of covering an avalanche happening in my country, and next no lives involved.

But UFO research could also be about lights in the sky, except for not making it any credibility among users either.

If for some reason Paleontology could be part of evolution, and this time for that of the Earth itself, also that an understanding about Fundamental Laws of Physics,
as well as also elementary particles, could perhaps be telling about Creation itself, and next for that of the Universe.

Could I also be left at the missing link for that of "Lucy" here as well, if not making it the birth of the solar system, next for both the sun, and also planets, as well as also life,
and also the story which could be behind?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

Mentioned before for this, except for not making it any Cytoplasm either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytoplasm

Here nature at its best, and next also the Scientific Method for also that of Proof,
if perhaps not any betterment of science either.

Any flaws for that of possible discoveries, or could we still make it Trilobites for the whole thing?

Or could we rather make it "Flaws" for that of possible thinking, when it rather could be about the subject of Theology, for next also that of Religion?

Just wondering, of course.
ID: 1935706 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935715 - Posted: 14 May 2018, 21:53:03 UTC
Last modified: 14 May 2018, 21:57:54 UTC

Making a comment for that of a bad sound being heard at the very end of a musical clip in a playlist,
I still loved the music, and it became a quite enjoyable moment for that of a session, while also finishing off the last beer, as usual.

Funny, but perhaps not being any pray man, for next that of possible worshipping, or Belief, I also could be an Atheist as well, if not any Agnostic either,
for the sake of science.

So, small or large caps for that above, and suggestions are welcome.

Or perhaps rather dawn, for that of the twilight zone, except for perhaps not "in the heat of the night" either.

Here that of the shoemaker once again, together with his laces, except for still such a thing as Belief, next for that of Religion, when it rather should be science.

Definitely a given attitude for that of science itself, but next make it that of evolution versus search for extraterrestrial intelligence, something is wrong,
and I am left with one more piece of chicken from the box, together with some potato salad.

Or perhaps rather such a thing as a handshake here, when it rather could be about a protocol, if not such a thing between a President and an alien either,
because I could be left perhaps thinking about different Methodologies for that of science, when it also could be about a similar Proof.

This was what I perhaps meant by tuft, or tufting, in that it perhaps should not be any resting on wings either, except for also the bird Phoenix, for such a thing.

Creation could be both Matter Creation and also Creation myth, and next we could also "believe" in one thing versus another, because of just such a thing,
namely that of making it Proof from that of facts, except for no such thing as Existence for that of any gods or angels either.

Should Religion be adhering to given "facts" as well, or should it rather rely on the old principle of the "Dark Ages"?

Please have me excused for not having the fine words in front of me right now.

But it goes like that of still making it the Scientific Method for that of also Proof, except for not any nonsense or the like for that of a given "Faith" you might have.

Here the word "Comprehension" for such a thing, in that at least a view of the Universe, if not any notion either, could be that of infinity for such a thing.

So for this, also "when Harry met Sally", if not perhaps a handshake either, for that of Matter itself meeting up with that of a possible Myth, for that of Creation itself.

Definitely a difference between both flies and ants, if not any numbers either, for what you next might be able to "quantisize" for such a thing,
but also that the heaven could be filled with stars, and not only because of your imagination either.

So therefore also stuck fingers as well, if still not any flies or ants either, for next also that of also Comprehension, which could also make for that of extol, or aggrandizement as well,
and next for that of words only.

Should Creation myth be about Creation itself, or should it rather be about a possible Creator, next for everything?

Yes, silly me, if not any stupid, or stupider either, but if perhaps still Creation myth for that of science itself, we should also believe in a Creator?

Those equations at least for that of Torsion, are quite elegant, and you also have both integrals, algebra, if not any Field Equations as well, for the same thing,
except for not forgetting that of Probability as well, which like also Logic, could perhaps tell whether we are alone in space.

Perhaps we could leave it with that of Mysteries, magic and miracles again, next for also that of an Apparition as well, next for a sense of the possible supernatural,
if not making it an unexplained phenomena either, for that of objects visible in the sky.

But still also "knock-knock", next for that of your hat, if not any "hat's off either", because we could well do the same with a given project,
in order for making it common sense, and perhaps no such thing possible either (meaning lights in the sky).

Make it rather still the Scientific Method, and we could be left with that of Facts, if perhaps not any "Proof" either for such a thing, because at least it should be about Logic.

The fact is that you sometimes could be wishing for a better world, if not any striving either, but also that a given perdition, or damnation should also be telling about Hell.

But if rather God himself for that of also Creation as well, also that of Creation myth as well, and next also a guess, or perhaps thought of a "heavy hand" perhaps involved.

If I rather could make it Order versus Chaos for such a thing, also that Matter apparently came into existence from next nothing, for next also that of Laws and Equations as well.

Here still that of "In the beginning" as well, which by means of a best guess, could be that of a scientist for such a thing.

If still such a thing as a debate for that of God himself, except for perhaps not any science either, the story could be old, and also familiar.

But next perhaps not the same for any "pull of the plug", for that of science itself, except for also making a Journey to the end of space,
next for that of also Comprehension.

The well known fact is that the harder you fall, the sooner it may happen as well, except for a sometimes bleeding nose, if not rather any such thing as a vision,
for that of a possible visionary experience as well.

Make science what it is, except for not any "gut" feeling either, for next both strolling on the Moon at times, if not making it to the end of the Universe either.

Take earthquakes as an example, where at least it should be research into the Earth itself, including its crust.

Next no such thing as "Little Green Men" here, or perhaps "Method of Proof", for also that of also Belief as well, because it should not be the same.

But also perhaps being confused or mislead here, in that making it both gods and angels, when it rather should be about possible technology,
if not a natural phenomenon either, could be a diversion, or derailment from the current debate.

Is it therefore why I could almost end up being an Agnostic, for that of science itself, in that perhaps aliens or extraterrestrials should not be the same as any gods or angels either,
for also that of a similar attitude you might have in regards with that of possible science?

We could perhaps make it still both extol or aggrandizement for that of science itself, except for perhaps not only words either, but again also the difference between
"Love and compassion", and that of damnation or perdition, next for that of both Heaven and Hell.

Science perhaps does not sell either, at least not always, in the same way as I also could be having money for that of my income, next for at least that of food.

But next also a "thanks" for that of the food, and for this at least folding your hands before using the fork and knife on the whole thing, because here not
Our Father, or Lord's Prayer either.

Do not forget that there is sometimes that of "hard science" being carried out, and next also no such thing as a "Method of Proof" needed either, for that of only facts.

If Comprehension rather should be about a Method of Proof, or even the Scientific Method for such a thing, or maybe vice versa, perhaps something quite different.

Again, make the door wide, and also high, if not any Portal for such a thing either, because for one thing you could be still a believer of sorts, if not a trashbin either,
for next what you could be told, for that of possible truth.

Make it both dreams, if not any Mysteries, magic and miracles either, and still the sense here that one thing could be still science, while perhaps the other Religion.

Make it aliens or extraterrestrials, and perhaps not the same as any good versus evil either, next for also that of both gods and angels.

Here that of a dogma for such thing, and next by means of the Alien Interview, in that we perhaps could believe in the subject, but rather that he could be telling about the Universe.

So, are gods or angels perhaps entities, if not any divine either, for such a thing?

Or should I rather believe in Creation once again, only because it also could be about Existence?

We could be having the word or phrase "Too soon, if perhaps not any late either".

If perhaps so, we also should know in which context it should belong, except for not making it any notion of time either, or even a sense of bad luck.

I hate to say it, but I made it that of Foundation in the previous for that of a piece of paper, when it rather could be something else.

Here as usual, scientists could be laughing at Religion, only because they also happen to be Atheists or Agnostics, except for not forgetting about Creation myth either.

Make it rather a melody for next also a musical track as well, and still that of a guess that making it Eternity could make it again a derailment or diversion from that of
actual facts, at least when science is being concerned, in only being at least one option or possibility among others.

To earth we go, from soil we came, if perhaps not any dirt either for such a thing.

But next also "easy come, easy go" as well, in that we sometimes could think of a Portal to Heavens, if perhaps not any Stairways either, and next by means of Religion.

If perhaps rather still Phoenix the bird for such a thing, I have been at a funeral myself, and next also a sense that this was not the end of the road at all.

But next "you also dare" for such a thing, except for perhaps not being told either, or even rolling up your sleeves for such a thing, next for also possible Comprehension.

If perhaps not any Intuition either, rather the soothsayer, or perhaps fortune teller, because here not about any Prophecy either, because perhaps a slight difference.

Do not forget that I am stil supposed to laugh at the subject of Religion, if not any poking with that of science either.

Here that at least "Either/Or", for next also "Neither/Nor", could be making for a Contradiction for that of Logic, if perhaps not any Ambiguity either.

Make it rather the elementary particles, together with respective Laws and Equations, also that you may be having "Constructs" for the similar,
if perhaps not making it any dogma or aspects either.

For this perhaps still only a couple of words, if not any nice ones either, and I am supposed to at least believe in Matter Creation as the reason for the Universe itself.

Not an expert on birds myself, but you may perhaps have heard the rhyme, or melody for that of a blue sparrow, or Tit, flying through the window, next for also children?

Becomes only a wild guess right now, and needs checking, but perhaps a more symbolic meaning here, for possibly something else?

Definitely Phoenix the bird for that of Mythology, or even anecdotes, but perhaps not any sparrow either, for that of a Tit, except for not any slur either,
for that of a syllable.

Or perhaps rather "Tit for tat" for that of a different meaning, except for not any Pokemon either, because sometimes you could be leaving the game,
and having your shoes being put on the shelf, except for not any shoelaces either.

For a similar reason, also that different elements of science should also be making it their respective parts as well, and next for that of a difference for that of subject.

One part being stuck in your hand, if not left away, and you could still be the player of the game, except for not any dealer either.

For this sometimes a dispatcher in a telephone central, if not making it the subject of Distribution either.

And still not forget your shoes either, for also shoelaces, which could have been put on the shelf, and you could be left with the option of making it elementary particles,
when it rather could be about a Journey to the end of the Universe, or perhaps space.

Assuming the Universe, and we next assume both Laws and Equations as well, except for not making it "things" for at least that of Existence.

But next that I also could believe in Creation for at least one thing or another, only when science could be of importance, or perhaps relevant.

So, is perhaps Order a "pretext" for perhaps Chaos, or maybe vice versa, only for that of Creation itself, and next that it could have been everything out of nothing?

Here it should be a different word, possibly previously mentioned, and at least that of Axioms here, if perhaps not something else, like a Prerequisite.

I could also make it Logical Consequence here, but apparently need the cup of coffee first.

But also that of a tenet or doctrine as well, except for not making it any teaching either, when it next rather could be science, rather than perhaps Religion.

In the world of mathematics, or programming languages, we have that of iterative versus recursive functions, or maybe algorithms, except for no such thing as any loopback either.

Maybe it is the frog jumping, if perhaps not any salmon either, but you should also know about the Ten Commandments here.

For this perhaps not even a famous equation either, which could be telling about almost everything, except for no such thing as "absolutely",
for that of absoluteness, when it rather could be about possible silence.

But rather the same thing, namely "ding-dong", next ring the bell as well, for at least sometimes a couple of things popping up in your mind, telling about possible clairvoyance.

Or perhaps rather a series of God for that of the Wikipedia, when it rather should be Parapsychology for next that of Telekinese.

Here I was again thinking about the most relevant article here, being the basis for most of the others, and perhaps not the first above here.

But next also the similar for at least elementary particles, if perhaps not anything else either, and we still could be relying on the Method of Proof,
and also Logic, for at least science itself.

Einstein could make it at least "God is not playing with any dices", if perhaps not one or two similar, or other phrases as well.

Here next Jesus Christ for at least a notion of Belief, as well as Faith, in the context, if not any sense of Religion, and we could also make it the Ten Commandments for much the same.

Here the lost or forgotten word, namely Premise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

Could you next make it also a Copenhagen interpretation of sorts, next for that of science, and here needs checking as well,
except for not forgetting the 2.4 inch telescope either, from my childhood years, for also a sense of joy and fun.

It really does not matter whether it perhaps is hat's on or hats off, or maybe that it could sometimes be fun, but also that science became mature,
from that of also immature, for next also making it heathen and pagan as well, for that of possible "belief".

Again, that of Plausibility, for next also plausible facts as well, in that I could perhaps believe in Existence, rather than only elementary particles itself,
for next also both Equations and Laws, but next that Creation myth could once again be making it both gods and angels, and still with the same purpose in mind.

To be precise, that of Creation again, except for also ringing a bell as well, in that perhaps something is wrong, or does not match or fit.

Should any glorification, extol, or aggrandizement be the same as a notion of Hell, only because of words only, or rather that it could be still Matter Creation versus
Creation myth, for still that of science?

Or perhaps rather that of a "heavy hand" again, because still in the middle of the day, and not the best part either.

The article about "Reason" is an excellent one, because it also should be about meaning, or purpose.

Like verbs, and also consononants, also coverbs as well, and at least we should know what God perhaps had to say, if not making it any Creation either.

Really, the matter of the fact is that we still could make it that of the Supernatural, when we also could be having Mysteries, magic and miracles,
if not making it any mirror either.

So, perhaps like flawed science, also down to earth as well, in that it could become a corns or bunions of sorts, if not any rod peeves either,
for that of a waste of time.

Remember Princess Leia (Carrie Fisher) screaming "What" in a sequence.

Guess what, but except for still making it blue for the colors of the sky, next what next for much the similar, when also pretend could translate into "Pretension".

But next perhaps not any adjective for any adverb either, in that we could also make it the Janus face for that of an illusion which sometimes could be hiding the real thing.

Becomes like the melody "From one thing to another, next for also one thing versus another".

Stick to a couple of principles and Methods, if not any poking for that of a Pokemon either, in that it also could be a handshake for science, and next versus that of Religion.

Here still a bit of science in the open, for that of also knowledge, except for not any God either, who could be telling about himself by means of a couple of phrases.

For this perhaps both the Quarks of the small versus the clusters of galaxies for that of the large, and it could be still Creation for the whole thing,
except for sometimes things hiding or lurking in the shadows, which could be that of Religion for that of a possible guess.

Here we could also make it the Mandelbrot set, or the similar, only because infinity could be a given or known principle.

Guess it next could be a bit of loopback, if not any jumpback either, for that of a saddle, when next making a journey through such a set,
only to find that it is only part of an even bigger scheme.

So, here still some ten ladders, if not any steps either, and you next have to climb one stairs for that of another, because here that of sets and infinity in mind,
and not that of any Portals of Perception.

Make it a set, and also subsets as well, and next you could also make it part versus whole as well, in the more usual or regular way.

From this it could also be assumed that "whole" should next mean that of infinity itself.

Like also Fools, also Fools and Horses as well, except for not any Dragons, or even "naughts" either.

We could perhaps have or make it both the Little and Small Dipper, for that of constellations in the sky, except for not Ursa Major, or Ursa Minor either.

Here also twins for that of children, if not any quintuples either, for next also still quantisizing the world, and next think that it also could be part versus whole.

Also that of a roundish, if not heavy stone, which at least could be telling about a physical object, except for not any object for that of an entity either,
like that of an Object Oriented language like C, or C++, or perhaps Java.

Remember that of throwing a flat stone on the surface of water, by next also "flipping" as well.

For all of this, it becomes the Laws of Physics, and next also the constraints or limits of nature, if not any possibilities offered as well, for that of also things being "set".

Making perhaps one thing for another, if not necessarily given either, and perhaps not only Logic either, or perhaps even the Janus face, but here need a bit more of thinking.

Here for that of both possibilities and limits, of course.

allude

Something that realizing for also that of a Realization (and not that fond of the word),

and also that it could be embody, or reincarnate as well, except for perhaps not any Reincarnation either.

embody the soul

reimbursement, for that of also refuse, because if not wrong, someone made a bit of fun with this as well.

Or perhaps rather that of doing my share as the part of the work, next across some 15 years here, and also 18 or 19 years of processing for that of collected raw data.

Either bittersweet, or perhaps no such thing either, for that of a slap in a face, when next thinking, if not giving a thought about perhaps being alone in space.

Like the Spirit of Louis, also no such a thing as a bad spirit for that of damp which could be coming out a nose for that of a smell.

Guess what, but the gardener could still be in his garden, picking up a couple of flowers, and next also smelling the taste, if not making it any "absolutely" either,
for that of a given sense, or perhaps feeling either.

Like a closed room, also the closed circle as well, for also that of the inner circle, and here perhaps not any "Circus" either, but rather that of Freemasonry instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthopedic_surgery

The latter link could be perhaps wrong, because here rather that of muscles and spasms once again, for that of also the Scientific Method telling whether one thing is true,
for next also wrong and still only Logic for the whole thing.

If God rather meant that of know versus not know, for that of know versus unknown, for next that of knowledge as well, at least such a thing possible when that of WYSIWYG is being concerned.

Guess what, but making a thing not true, means that it also could be false, if not any laughter from the audience either.

If God meant it to be true for that of also false, next for that of Creation itself, if not any Oath, or maybe "Truth" either, we perhaps should know.

The fact is that I sometimes could see both, if perhaps not telling either, about such a difference, and also why there should always be one thing with respect to another.

If perhaps an Apparition being possible, and next in the celestial sky, should it be for Love and compassion, or rather that of hatred for such a thing, only because of
Heaven and Hell itself?

Is not St. Peter supposed to be the "good" angel, only because he could be waiting at the door of the Heavens, and next also makes for a mind for that of a recapitulation of events
marking the physical life as a human being living on Earth?

For one thing we could assume that the Forces of both evil and good came along with Creation itself, except for not making it any good or evil Forces for that of divinity itself.

If still believing in a Creator, for next only myself, also that Creation became Creation myth as well, and next also a given notion of Heaven and Hell.

The alternative could be a "heavy hand" for this, as already mentioned.

If not wrong, it became that of Order versus Chaos for that of Creation itself, and here the Initial Moment of Creation as well.

Could it perhaps be "Pickabou" mountain, or should it rather be "Prick-prick" for that of science, in that a story could always be told, and next also be true?

Really, making it that of a Flat Earth, should not be the same as any "Hangar 18" either, except for perhaps both being ridiculed, next for that of a story.

Like the magician performing his art for the audience, also a couple of people in the forest at night, only because of lights being visible, and in each case,
or for both, perhaps the Method of Proof.

Needs editing above perhaps, because here also a word becoming lost, which I could have used.

Also searching for the correct name of the mountain using the Wikipedia, and like also before, slightly in vain.

So, what are those words, except for not leaving a trace behind, for also a "shred" of such things (meaning evidence) except for perhaps also a Reykjavik summit,
and next also an agenda, for that of making a couple of things on the table, for next that of a cup of coffee.

The more thinking about it, and also that of nature could be making it "Trolls", if not any "Fools or horses" either.

If you recall an album by musical band Saga, also that there is someone with a whip on the cover for just that particular wording above,
because here perhaps getting it a bit wrong.

Assumedly nature's Creation could still be about Laws and Equations as well, and next for that of both Physics, and also Mathematics.

For this also the best which could happen, if perhaps not wished for either, or possibly desired, for next that of good versus bad luck.

If we still could make it a famous Equation, for next also that of "Reason" itself, also a way for that of science, for that of also a way of Philosophical thinking.

Even a launch of a rocket could mean an empty bucket at the end, except for not being empty myself, for that of using my hands.

Here it went down the drain again for what I could be saying, and except for both thumbs up and thumbs down, we should know about such a thing as well.

But really that "Steady", and next also a firm hand as well, for that of a grip, in that both evolution, and also Creation, could be lying on a heavy Foundation,
for that of its basis, and therefore hard to touch, if not any unshakeable.

We could perhaps still make it a Thesis for that of an understanding of God, if not perhaps any Creation myth either, but next perhaps not so for that of both distance and scale,
when next trying to measure the weight of the Earth, for also that of the Avogadro constant, if not making it any distance either, for that of the vastness of space itself.

Perhaps leave it there, for that of the cup of coffee, and also the cake.
ID: 1935715 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935762 - Posted: 15 May 2018, 8:07:51 UTC
Last modified: 15 May 2018, 8:21:14 UTC

Two short things only, namely having some fun looking at a couple of still frames from a video camera not being used anymore, and put away.

The pictures ended up on my disk, however.

Remember the fact that you sometimes could make it Intelligent design for also the religious argument for the existence of God, and perhaps not the right subject here either.

But if rather the birds and the bees for a couple of things, next the humble stance as well, in that programming languages could be modular by design, if not any structured either,
and therefore also Object Oriented as well.

Supposedly the Implementation phase, or the way of carrying out things in practise, follows the Design phase, at least when projects are being concerned,
but also that I could end up looking at the Andromeda galaxy almost full screen, using sky-map.org .

But if still also Intelligent design, or should I rather believe in the subject of robots or the like, because of modularity, and also a way products out of technology
could be having their own design, not because of any Intelligent design, but rather as a result of a specification and next construction phase?

Could I be a dreamer of sorts believing in Intelligent design, only because there also could be a Creator behind such a thing, at least when it comes to the Universe?

I still happen to look at those pictures, or maybe frames, but next also that of Consensus for that of science, where it still could be the Man in the Street for a couple of things,
and next science could be left empty handed for that of its opinion.

At least the way I could be catching a couple of things here, if not interpreting it in the same way either.

And the lines becomes wrapped here as well before posting, like also "In the heat of the night" as well.
ID: 1935762 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935767 - Posted: 15 May 2018, 8:51:00 UTC
Last modified: 15 May 2018, 9:03:33 UTC

So, dead hot in here right now, and I am at least damp, and therefore not running the tasks either.

Perhaps not lacking any will either, but it rather becomes the practical issue for a couple of things, and after 15 years here,
supposedly not my first day either.

Sometimes people could be having their own meaning because they happen to be stubborn, but also that they could be left with that of wrong doing, for a couple a things.

In the world of crime, or maybe prosecution, that of willful, or intentional, if not any deliberate either, are being used for acts of crime,
making sometimes a difference between a run over of a person by means of traffic, and that of also using a knife in anger, next killing a person.

Thinking, you also could be making it "aggravated murder" as well, at times.

Possibly not any Seti@home related either, but still an important issue, perhaps, because if you are the one flipping the server, and someone gets in your way,
you next will also say such a thing for that of "get out of my way".

If one single word for that of wrongdoing, also that it translates into that of misdemeanor or malpractice as well, if not also any misconduct either.

Also the word premeditated as well, which also needed a translation in order to get correct.

Perhaps told or mentioned about in the past, but I had a humble in here in the past, ending up on the floor with a thud, and next having a taste on the biscuits lying on the floor.

But still translates into humble stance, when it also could be that of anger and frustration, if not any primitive behavior, for next also that of aggression and instinct,
and we could be back at the crocodiles for such a thing, and also that of evolution as well.

The other alternative is that of joining the club, if perhaps not any singing either, but next for that of a "belief" on its own, or "per se", or maybe intrinsically,
next for that of intelligent life in space.

Next it also becomes that of ufology, and we could pretend the subject, if not any story behind, to also be true, except for not any Scientific Method either.

If perhaps getting up from the chair, for next that of a "readily acknowledgment" as well (the fine word for this), we could also make a conclusion about such life,
meaning that we also are not alone in space.

If perhaps so, or at least feasible, does this change things for that of a possible view on the Universe, meaning a debate for that of its origin, where you could be left to choose between
evolution on one hand, and next that of Intelligent design on the other?

Perhaps not the best wording either, except for being quite damp in here, and I therefore need a break for this.
ID: 1935767 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1935777 - Posted: 15 May 2018, 9:30:06 UTC
Last modified: 15 May 2018, 10:05:53 UTC

Again that of ending up in a court sometimes, if not making it any sentencing either, where at least that of Laws and Equations,
next for that of nature, and not any ufology, or even "Belief", including also that of Faith, might be possible.

Like love and tolerance, also peace and harmony as well, and again you could be looking at the Andromeda galaxy, for perhaps not any "delightful" either,
but rather that of splendor, because of its old age.

Here that of both vast distances, and also tiny amounts of time which could be defined by means of the Planck constant, and next for that of also quantisizing as well,
if perhaps not any specifying either, next for that of a specification, which could also end up with the design and implementation phase as well, at least for that of projects.

But is such a thing as Belief and Faith still a far thing off, for that of also far-fetched, when sometimes science is being concerned, including being an Atheist, or Agnostic, for such a thing?

Guess what, but we could still make it a scientific debate, next for perhaps God as well, except for not any Religious or Theological debate either, using the same wording as in the previous.

If perhaps so, you could be left with the assumption that nature did not come out on its own, for that of randomness and chaos only, for next also that of Order as well, side by side.

Therefore, Creation could still be both, meaning Matter Creation versus Creation myth, because we also could make it Existence as well, and also that of "Reason" for that of a meaning.

Only the fact that we could be having both God and the Devil, for next also Heaven and Hell, is that end of your show, if not only making it still Matter Creation for the whole thing.

Also that really it does not make any sense, at least when myself is being concerned, because still that of the Andromeda galaxy, with its solemn beauty, if not any loneliness either,
and also the fact that it all once started, only because of the notion of time.

Should we forget both beauty and also color, if not any loneliness either, for that of also vastness of space, for that of still Laws and Equations for the same thing,
except not making it any Consensus either, for that of also elementary particles?

Perhaps mentioned before, but for both a circle and a square, if not anything else, you could also be having something else, which sometimes could be hard to define.

Or I am I perhaps wrong, in that it could be still about the implementation and construction phase, when it also could be that of design as well, if not any such thing as facing God either,
for that of the sake of Religion itself?

Most likely still an open question for that of a debate, if not any answer either, and still hanging in the air for much the same.

Becomes a thought here that even God meant the whole thing next for that of Creation.
ID: 1935777 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 109 · 110 · 111 · 112 · 113 · 114 · 115 . . . 332 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.