Or perhaps this before I go, because I just checked in with Yahoo! for that of the news.

A constant could be undefined, like also a variable, but next make it a punishment, and you could also have Hell itself, next in a possible disguise.

If something could rather be defined, next also a definition as well, and for this also infinity for that of limits without borders.

Think of bubbles in a liquid substance or fluid, like soap.

How often do such bubbles merge, rather than perhaps spilt up, or even burst?

Make it Existensialism as well, for that of a bit down the drain, and next add to it both Consequences and also a bit of Fallacies, when perhaps infinity is not enough.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism

Next also Tears in rain as well, and what is perhaps the most important here?

Perhaps rather the lizard here, wearing a green hat atop of its head.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God

My guess is that Philosophy alone is not the main reason or excuse for that of "proving" the existence of God.

But rather that you could pick a subject in order to make it fit a given purpose, and next also your own way of thinking as well.

There is no reason to forget that clergy, or clerics are throwing away such a thing as the Devil, when it also could be that of Hell, for the same thing.

Like a scientific flaw or mishap of its own, perhaps this could be the Theological flaw here, for perhaps such a way of thinking.

If perhaps rather "Theory of everything" for at least science, next we could also be looking at the Universe as well, and know its intrinsic state, and also condition,
except for perhaps not giving a thought about ourselves in the same place or picture.

Yes, a gut feeling should not be the same as a bad feeling either, except for sometimes people having such a sense.

If everything is meant for perhaps a purpose, next also a meaning as well, and for the same reason we could also make it randomness and chaos,
for next also a bit of turmoil, where a dead end also could mean sudden death as well.

I made a comment about transitioner versus scheduler logic at PrimeGrid, in that I could not find the first one at Wikipedia.

Again, it becomes that of an open book for that of telling, and next also knowing, next for that of also making it the Universe.

Beware the wolf, or perhaps mind a bit, for next not knowing where it all could perhaps end for where it next also once started,
only because it could be beginning versus end.

And next I am still only sitting in a chair for next only a bit of dreaming.

Perhaps I should have switched order here, but next also the fact that numbers alone should still be "Poor man's science" only.

Before checking, I already knew that it could be foundation here, and next also basis or grounds as well, next for a way of Philosophy,
in order to perhaps prove God, by means of a Method alone.

What is next, except giving the whole thing a laugh, by also making it such a thing, and next both ourselves with respect to both Type I, and Type II civilizations,
on the Kardashev scale?

Definitely powder for next that of fireworks as well, but next that Type III civilizations could be a bit off, or unknown, and I was silly enough at leaving the whole thing on the shelf.

Ever heard about "Observational facts" versus "Credible evidence" and next it could still be one thing for another for such a thing, including the use of technology.

Is perhaps "Witness to the execution" a better thing than Proof itself, which next could also be evidence that we are perhaps not alone?

We could perhaps know about the single rail for that of a track, where it perhaps could go off, or derail at times, but what it it rather remains standing on the track?

Here the word "devious" for such a thing, and next I have heard it before, like also cunning as well.

Make it rather technology for a given purpose, and next also advanced or sophisticated as well, except for perhaps not any "Method of Proof" either, for such a thing.

A train is perhaps not the same as any bandwagon either, but is this next the reason or excuse for making it a "Stairways to Heaven" at times?

Is it possible to make it any Formalism here, by means of also Religion alone, or itself?

Who is giving or offering a hand here, for that of a lesson, or lesson of sorts, meaning teaching, in that it next could be dinner served, and you could be doing the first semester at school,
for next also "Our Prayer", when having the second meal of the day, meaning lunch.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celibacy

Celibacy perhaps, but next also a difference between "dinner served" and next that of the hammer and nail, for that of knowledge being thrown in your face.

Do not have the title right now, but here Madonna (the musical artist) next with the dark cross, and not "Like a Virgin" either.

Because here I could still be the teacher of sorts for next also the hammer and nail, for that of knowledge being delivered in my hands,
next by means of one way or another, because not about the hammer and feather here.

Perception of reality here, or perhaps worldview.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stork

Here next the possible excuse for ending up in bed with someone, except for not any pink shirt either, which could rather be about calling someone on the phone.

I sometimes could be throwing in the towel for that of a feint versus a counterfeit, but if rather that of Monotheism as a way of thought, or perhaps Belief,
which still could also be such a thing as processes, which could be telling about nature itself?

Is it still because it perhaps could be one thing for another, and next I do not really know.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

Compare with "Theory of everything" above, which for now I could be making at least Laws and Equations for such a thing.

Here the posting tab ended up alone in its own session, and need to use ALT-TAB, or SHIFT-ALT-TAB, for the rest of it.

Probably you do not like the word "kickass" that much, particularly early in the morning, but why still such a thing as Blasphemy, next in order to also make it the world.

Here, perhaps read Existence, for that of the world itself.

"I believe in nature" and next also perhaps God as well.

Perhaps not fair to say, but some people come with big lips, and sometimes a big nose as well, and next perhaps because of a bit of curiosity as well.

Make it "Eternity" for that of a clergy, or cleric, and next also E=mc2, for that of a scientist, and next "No problem" either, or at all.

We perhaps could know about the Ten Commandments for that of a spoken word, but perhaps making it too much for that of Ten, versus only Commandment(s) itself.

Like still a feint, also that of a slip of the tongue as well, and next the fact that science could often be speaking for itself, except for such a slip,
by also making it either the Man in the Street, or even the child in the kindergarten, for that of a learning process, or perhaps experience.

sight, countenance, presence

Here mercy above, or a little earlier, but like also miracles as well, either they are not supposed to be happening, or they could be thrown away,
for that of the Scientific Method itself, with no respect for that of any "Belief".

Could I still have dinner served, of course, or except for such a thing as any Field equations either, could perhaps make up my mind, for next perhaps believing in such a thing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatism

Forget both the speed of light, and also a sense of reality, for next the fact of Perception itself, as perhaps part of the Supernatural.

I perhaps made it both measure and measurability, for next that of meaning versus meaningless, but if perhaps so, am I still talking about Creation here?

Yes, a top hat should also mean a down bottom as well, except for not any oil spill, for that of a spillover, but next also both top and bottom, if not any rear,
for both a keyboard itself, and next also a spiral galaxy.

Here look "down" at a galaxy, and it should be the rear butt, if not the front end either, for such a thing, if you happen to be so inclined.

The old phrase or wording is that Cinderella (or the like) could still feel or make it the pea, below layers of pillows or mattresses.

If rather a Logical consequence, also Consequential analysis as well, for that of possible events happening, and next I could be a deputy,
or perhaps messenger for such a thing.

Here the debate ended up in a big smear, except for perhaps not any mud either, but if perhaps not so, could it still be Jesus Christ hanging on the Cross,
for that of a lost soul or mind?

Here, Perdition or Damnation for such a thing, except for that destiny could also mean oblivion as well, if not being able to make it clearer above.

Fun. eh. but next also absolutely as well, when it rather should be about corruption.

You see, scientists could sometimes choose to make it both a way of life, and also way of thought, for making it both Dark Matter and Dark Energy,
when it next could also be about Existence as well.

Supposedly we are not living in any Paradise either, for next that of a Garden of Eden, but we still could be children of Earth, for a way of living.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrast

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrast_(vision)

Here, adjust the picture for that of your television set, or monitor, except for not any hearsay either, which could be telling about a different world.

So, what is the difference between a proton, and next the Garden of Eden here, for that of an understanding, or possible belief?

Throw away, and next also throw it all away, for that of also Messiah, for that of Jesus Christ.

Do I next slip my foot, rather than perhaps tongue, by next thinking that a certain level for that of Intelligence (Type III) should mean the same as an illusion, or even holography?

My guess is that scientists could be laughing at Religion at times, only because of Religion itself, except for not making it any science either.

Therefore only Windows Messenger for that of Messiah, or perhaps Jesus Christ, and next my bad.

Open up a wrong page in a book, and still a page, of course, but next which one?

Express your feelings, and next also gut mind as well, in that it could also be a love song of sorts, next by Madonna, but next wearing the black shirt, rather than the pink one.

My eyes here now, when starting up in the morning.

You said so, of course, and therefore not always numbers for me, at least here, but if perhaps like Bill G here, I also could be checking with the server status pages,
something which I do not always do myself either, and perhaps because of the pull-down menu system, which I do not like.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_server_status.php

It better should have it by means of a single click of a mouse, where one link made the way for the rest of the information to be available.

Making it such a thing, and next also that of splitters and channels, as well as also tapes for that of finished, versus still remaining, meaning left to do.

Assuming that you could fill in the dots for that of blank positions in the sky, you also get a better overall picture, but next also for only fixed locations in space.

Impossible for me to see perhaps, but guessing here that different task types should also mean different results, in that both a .vlar tasks and also SoG as well,
should be doing one part of the work, while the gaussian search next another, and still cover much the same place in the sky.

I had the surprise of finishing off yesterday, with one remaining beer, and also that a genefer15 CUDA task also finish up with what I think are the Optimal settings in the BIOS,
and also the 100%, 100%, 50% settings in the local Preferences (BOINC Manager) for that of running.

Leaving the computer with four genefer17 LOW tasks for the CPU, since I had been running Seti@home almost all day, and here only for the CPU.

Again, not any "spooky" here either, and I could leave that to a later time.

This because Lucy could be our common ancestor here on Earth, but next no such thing for any extraterrestrial intelligence either, where it rather could be a guess of other
intelligent civilizations being found and present throughout space, because of the rules and laws given by nature itself.

Next also the fact that we could also be having the Pauli exclusion principle, as well as also the Uncertainty Principle, but also the fact that we are children of Earth because of
even more or different circumstances than that.

Pop up for the small thing called intelligence, and next both trilobites and alligators developing through eons of time, because of evolution itself.

But next perhaps not any write off of or throw away of space either, including its environment, which also could mean set or preset conditions for that of life.

In the constellation Cassiopeia, there is a cluster of stars having the name of NGC 457, and like also the similar NGC 4755 in Crux, they are both unimaginable places.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crux

Need to pull the Burnham's Celestial Handbook here from the shelf, because perhaps a discussion of a star close to NGC457, which next could be a yellow supergiant,
and also that I do not have the NGC number for the similar star cluster close to the Coalsack Nebula, in the southern constellation Crux.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalsack_Nebula

Here it becomes NGC 4755 for that of the latter, and also going by the name "Jewel Box".

Needed a lookup here for that of the southern latitude, and next not the place which should be the most familiar.

You still have both the line and the curve, and next also the single rail line for that of both the throttle and break, but next also the force of Inertia as well.

Make it rather a puzzle, and next also a name as well, in that WYSIWYG could still be what your eyes could see, next for also that of Perception,
but that it also could be a way of looking at the Universe, called Worldview.

Or, which I next made that of "Perception of reality", next for what our eyes could be able to see, and next also be telling about the Universe.

Perhaps not any fish and chips either, for that of "dinner served", but rather perhaps the unfinished painting, or in fact version of a product,
which could be the fine balance between compromises.

This in the sense that microcosmos meets up with macrocosmos of sorts, for that of elementary particles and radiation being the reason for everything.

For this you could think the whole think being blown out of fashion when it comes to size, when it rather should be about the small things,
next perhaps because of such a thing as "Inflation" itself.

Here meaning an inflationary universe, and not any pocket money for that of an investment which could go bust, or end up in failure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)

Should I next forget both tairs and despair for the fact that it also could be about beauty and magnificence as well?

My guess is that Love from God could be the opposite of Fear for that of wars and conflicts, but next that the Universe itself should not be telling of such a thing,
despite its beauty.

You could be having two hands, and next also a couple of fingers as well, but if perhaps third hand as well, where is the ghost for this supposed to be coming from?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pok%C3%A9mon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veto

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_veto_power

The first one should be about "give me a laugh" here, while the latter two should not be about any ambiguity either, when it comes to possible Governance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

I guess that Ambiguity could be making for a certain interpretation of the world possible, but perhaps not the same as telling about given factors or properties either,
next for that of the Universe.

For this, a certain "taught" for that of teaching as well, except not any Worldview either, or even teaching a lesson.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

Here not Google Translate with me for that of the single word, but next both mentor, teacher, master and tutor, for perhaps that of "taught" itself,
except for not any Aladdin using the crystal ball either (and not Prediction).

Sometimes we could be making it a "readily acceptance" by also acknowledging a couple of ideas, and next because of also principles behind.

Next it also could become fact as well, for that of "accepted science" for that of thoughts and ideas, if not any true discoveries.

Sadly to say. but next no such a thing as a handshake between the Pope and an alien or extraterrestrial, for obvious reasons.

Regardless of Flatland, or even Pokemon, always a notion about the Universe, for that of thinking, which should be such a thing for that of reality as well.

I almost made it reflection of reality above, but found that it did not become a proper thing to say.

If you happen to make a travel to the End of the Universe, always a look back at both yourself, and next where you came from,
except for such a thing as taking the bus or train each day, and next ending up at both top and bottom in a repeating fashion.

The line could be such an example here, where it could be both the start and the end, and for that, also the finish.

Is it not the fact that we could always look at Creation itself, for what it both appears like, and also could be meant to be?

Here arithmetic operators like <, >, =, <=, and >=, and also 0 for that of -1, next for that of also negation, and it supposedly could also be Logic.

Or which supposedly could next also be Logic, above.

But next that a Prayer itself should mean a certain Belief, and next in that of God.

Should Proof itself be about false or true statements, only because it could be about Logic itself?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate

Read my lips, and I am not always preaching either, except not forgetting the apostrophes either.

Supposedly science could beat Religion for that of Belief itself, except for the fact that the latter could also mean something else.

You could perhaps end up with a dictionary of "slants" for that of numbers, or even syntax expressions, but could this next be such a thing for that of ideas or thoughts?

Like Thought, also Mind, or the like, and supposedly it perhaps could not be about Religion all the time either, because of also intellect or intellectuality as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellect

We could be having a Book of sorts for both the Bible, and next also world, meaning Earth, and for this also making it a fact sheet as well.

Type III civilizations are perhaps undefined by means of its possible meaning, but always that little thing with me about Equations being part of nature,
next for perhaps such a thing, except for not telling any more or else.

Or at least hard to explain, above.

Here OR as a logical expression, when it next could also mean "Both", or 1 (true).

Or perhaps Boolean expression above.

"Speaking of", and next you also know what I could say, for that of possible preaching, and for this once again about God.

Scientists could rather choose to say a different thing, and make it "fabric of space" instead.

Why a celebration could sometimes end up with nutcake being shared, and not any nuts either, is because of a translation alone, and for this also a syntax.

The difference between a refractor and a reflector for that of a telescope, is its magnifying feature, or capability, and therefore that of concave versus convex.

Needs checking here, because this could also be for that of a microscope as well, or even a pair of glasses (focal length, among other things).

Make it rather sharing, and it could be both sharing of a room, or apartment, or perhaps rather file sharing, and we could still be back at both syntax,
and also a given interpretation of such a thing, depending on conditions.

Or perhaps also circumstances as well, above.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drone

Belive it or not, or perhaps lost the whole thing here, for that of a new world of technology which suddenly popped up, and next became available.

A game of chess could also be a piece game, but except for peace itself, rather that it could still be about wars and conflicts.

But also the fact that science could be having an excuse of its own, when perhaps coming up with a couple of explanations for a given world.

Make it a comparison, and next not any difference either, for that of also Differential Equations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_equation

Solve Rubik's cube, if you will, and next perhaps not about any "Man in the Street" either, for next also "eyes could tell", except for not any Logic being the decisive factor
of the end game either, because here also the word "Infallability".

But again that you could be having the Toolbox of sorts, for that of a construction method, except for not making it such a thing as "Intelligent Design" instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hoc

The four genefer 17 tasks went out of the task list right now, and will be commencing with some four more Seti@home tasks shortly.

If you look back, also that of both Events and also the Drake equation, for that of explaining nature, and except for perhaps "Order" itself,
where is it supposed to all end?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lookback_option

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Before_Present

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_measures_(cosmology)

So, which one here for next that of "Lookback mirror", or the similar, and needs checking here, but perhaps the latter one, for our purpose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Through_the_Looking_Glass_(2016_film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Deep_(1977_film)

Any suggestions welcome, because here at least mind-boggling.

I notice the fact that notion, term, and concept are different words of the same syntax, going sometimes hand in hand at times.

A syntax error for that of a labeling should not be any error either, but is rather the opposite fact possible?

2 = 2 should be "true", only because they are equal, and next in arithmetic terms, or means only, and not any Logic.

Because here "=" should be the expression itself, and next also represent the same as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate

I mentioned Predicate above, and also Logical consequence as well, except not making any table for that of true versus false.

Tell me about such a thing as a "false" reality, when it also could be about virtual reality as well, and next not any actual conception of any "true" reality either,
for next both that of the world, and also Universe.

Making it rather a "Logical Fallacy", and it perhaps does not matter whether or not a thing is true or not, but rather that of Logic itself.

Next make it the same thing for that of the Universe itself, and also that of "Observational facts" versus "Credible evidence".

I better launch four more new CPU tasks in the Manager right now.

Should tell that I went to replace the power supply of the computer this morning, after finding out that it did not want to do anymore with the one in use.

But here also a whining sound being heard as well, and therefore no reason to turn off the computer, only to enjoy both darkness and silence.

The data cable to the disks and CD/DVD drives, were initially two different ones, but, when making the power cables to the power supply, it needs going through
two holes in the soldered plate, making for some cramp or tight space.

Here still a 1200 W power supply, but rather 1200i, so therefore noticing that also the data cables needs to be replaced as well.

The main power connector is fed out at the rear and next through different openings, in order to get at the power supply, while the secondary power cable,
which needs its own connector on the motherboard, at the top, is stretched at its limit across the motherboard down to the power supply,
for now perhaps through the wrong opening, because it became one time too much, and next scratching my fingers.

And here only one long data cable available, making for some thinking in order to have it all connected against each other.

The data cable for both the disks and also CD/DVD's became fed or going around the plate, because of lack of space, because the two graphics cards need two power cables each.

The main power connector is itself two part here, with one slightly smaller than the other.

Compare with the server computer, still in the living room, and here all three connectors for the 1500 W power supply besides each other on the motherboard.

Checking, some two connectors towards the motherboard, and here 7*5, each in a double pair, while the three on the motherboard, I did not touch or open.

Here still normal mode for the BIOS, and only clicking on the selection, except for perhaps not making a difference at all, because next only
getting to the menu for the choice of the disks, except not any changes.

Perhaps it was dust making the reason for the undervolt here, and while quite a decent platform, the secondary power cable is too short.

Here also the bottom metal bracket supporting the box has come loose as well, and here I did not find any screws.

The litte sad thing is that also checking with the clock here while finished, it shows 7:50 PM, so here no shopping today.

Continuing with two PrimeGrid genefer 17 LOW tasks for the CPU, the graphics cards needs checking for that of CUDA as well,
but if you were reading around, here noticing that the AP27 tasks for that of the same, could return quite impressing results,
so here also wanting to run the Optimal mode as well, for that of speed, not being hampered by any errors.

I better check out with CUDA first for the Normal setting, and here the genefer 15 tasks, which now are only this way for the tasks themselves.

The Optimal mode needs a restart of the computer, and could be the next thing to do, but also that it should be better suspending any running tasks.

Here I get the countdown to the planned restart right now, and waiting a little, it postpones it some 15 minutes, unless doing anything more.

It did not work, most of the other things, including getting a copy of Windows 7 up and running.

I got a couple of hours of sleep, so here it became 4 PM local time, and I finished a couple of Seti@home tasks while doing so.

For now getting ready for doing the shopping, and I will have some more when back with the cup of coffee, because right now it became a really early wake up call.

And next rain is coming down in a quite big downpour, but better have it done anyway, because here also trying out web-based Yafu as well.

It apparently suspends all other CPU tasks, but I could make for some two more CUDA tasks running, and also two waiting as well.

Here perhaps more could be added, but that is soon for fun and entertainment, so here off to the shop in the meantime, at 5:30 PM.

Back again now after doing the shopping.

WU 10dc17ac.13806.167600.3.30.228_1_r679510555_0

Expanded the local SMV log in order to get at the user account being used and next keying in on the server as well.

Here did not find the result, and while some people could believe this is a ghost task, I could also think of other ideas.

Here both spike count and triplet count both 3, while the power and score, and so on are mostly blank for the result fields.

And not in the local spike or triplets log either, before checking the main boinc.csv log.

Some 2 hours of CPU running for this task, so here probably a more ordinary task, except for the missing fields.

For now the only task standing out a little, while still at a single log now containing a total of 14268 lines.

Also 15 years here as well, and this passing by a week ago.

Still Internet Explorer 11 here, and again losing a bit of better contents, for that of posting as well.

Needs a "catching" buffer here, next for what I perhaps said, in order to avoid such a thing.

The last one being lost was definitely not so bad either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sink

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinc_function

The end url when linking a text ends up on its own line when using Internet Explorer 11 as the web browser.

For now I do not know if it is the browser, or perhaps the web page itself, being the reason for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zinc

Took a couple of attempts here, next for that of element 30, next in the Periodic Table.

Dear Isaac, may I touch you, if perhaps not reading your lips either, next for that of gravity as a Fundamental force of nature, and next also a bit of sillyness of mankind.
by believing in possible intelligence in nature, and next by means of extraterrestrial intelligence as well.

Honesty and love could perhaps be following another, next in part as well, except for perhaps not any divided either.

Divided we fall, and next also conquer as well, except for not any even better either, which I next lost.

Like conception, also a bit of misconception at times as well, except for not any misunderstanding either, for next that of nature itself,
which could be in front of us, and next also both foot and feet, for next that of a given study.

Here that given thing, except for not any little or small thing either, next for that of such a thing also being a subject as well, and next also part of a discusssion.

A majesty could perhaps be almost like a king, except for not any "Majestic", or Majestic-12 / Majic12, which could next be symbolizing part of science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majestic_12

Needs a closer read here for that of the given subject at hand.

Why not make it a "belief" in a common sense, next for that of a UFO invasion of sorts, except for perhaps not any "Home alone" either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Home_Alone

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalar

Both scalability, and next also attributes as well, could be that of the Universe next to blame, except for not making it any Mathematics either.

Supposedly that above could next make me both a troll and an idiot as well, but what next what to say, if not any "heresay" either, for next the big question of
whether we perhaps are alone in space.

Does not translate here for that of "heresay", but next that good is perhaps better, or even worse, than both next better and best. for that of also superiority,
if not any superlatives either, for that of possible living beings or entities here on Earth, which we next could be making "creatures" as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Being

Next at your service as well, or of course.

Step on the ladder using your left foot, and also the threadmill as well, for that of both sillyness, if not any sinister either.

Here that of the traveling salesman in the lost post, and next perhaps nothing more being added.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4unfJmIvw0

If what I perhaps said, or meant to say, could be recovered, next fine, of course.

Make it rather a house or apartment, as well as a way of life, and next perhaps not any cheap either, and the same perhaps for that of science as well,
in that Logic is always supposed to be telling a possible answer, except for not any cheaters, or cheating either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Mentioned before, but perhaps only Postulate here, for that of an Axiom, in order to express a meaning, or perhaps one's own, for that of a possible opinion.

Make it rather "QWERTY", or even "WYSIWYG" next for that of a language, next also "Oh, be a fine girl, kiss me right now, sweatheart", ROFLMAO, and next so on.

Here Clyde Tombaugh perhaps discovered Pluto around 1930, and so on, but next also that the show must go on as well, for that of both continuation, and also contigencies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contingency

Hmm, according to plan...

Like "The Deep", and also "Blue Velvet" as well, a Philosophy for next that of living, and next also thinking as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep

Here perhaps not any Ursula Andress either, but rather a movie about deep sea diving, or possible adventure, where next that of water becomes that of ice as well,
for that of being frozen in time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Abyss

Heck, I do not know, or perhaps do not recall the name of the actress here, or right now, but also that an ice sculpture could be having a face at the front end.

Next also tell, if not any believe either, for next that of a "tell tale" story, which next could be told.

Here still the conductor of the train for that of a possible switchover, if perhaps not any derailment either, and next also such a thing for that of science as well,
with similar consequences or results being possible.

Sandman, perhaps, if not any closed eyes either, but what next is perhaps your idea, if not any impression either, for next a couple of things happening,
except for not making it any "Statutory rights" either, for that of a possible Court, or courtroom, next with also that of science in mind?

Right to kill perhaps, and next also rape as well, except for not any kingdom or goddess either, which could make it for that of you to decide,
and next also a decisive factor as well.

Always that of value versus valueless as well, except for not any kingdom, or Monarchy either, but if perhaps rather both decisions, as well as decision making as well,
'we should know that it could be part of nature for the whole thing.

Why not post here this time?

Losing the whole buffer because of a single keystroke.

Needs a fix here, because here again not too bad, in my opinion.

Too late to edit, but here closing a tab for that of a button, next using Microsoft Edge.

Here a YouTube link, or video, possibly not that bad for that of contents.

Keylogger, eh, except for not any stratosphere, or even Stradivarius either, because here it still could be happening, for that of such a thing,
meaning losing contents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_(constellation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus_X-1

In between here, or should perhaps be better marked, in order not to be missed, or forgotten.

Except for perhaps even more, or even "why me, while rather you", for a couple of things?

You see, dumb, dumber, dumbest, and next also "never forget" as well, for that of the stars in the celestial sky, for that of next silly me.

Creativity supposedly makes smart as well, for that of also innovativity, and next not any sillyness or stupidness at all.

So, why such a thing as both measure and measurement, while you could also be having the thing I still forget about,
which next could make me thinking about God as a possible Creator?

Or. did I perhaps say "Almighty" here, for that of possible drunkenness?

Ugly, crap, awful, terrible, or even hideous, you could sometimes be looking so, but next question nature from that of an objective point of view,
and next what you perhaps could find, or perhaps get to know about, or perhaps learn.

Hide and seek, or perhaps "Master in disguise" as well.

You know, a bit of abilities, and next also shortcomings as well, but if next rather questioning nature in a bit of "general terms", next how come,
for that of possible Laws or Equations?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Term

Here dangit, for next that of a broad perspective only.

Like "Here I am" also "supposedly as well, and here "buttocks and oats", or perhaps "goat and cheese" for such a thing.

You are welcome, of course.

Pretend to be a teacher, and next perhaps not God either.

"Be honored", or just "be honored" (glory be) and next such a thing from God as well, except for not your or any Almighty either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CeBoSQsBR0

Example only, for that of the first in the list, and next also such a thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUMWN-Vqamc

Here third, if you will.

Next think of science as possible "absolutes" as well, including that of a funeral, and next also the Scientific Method as well, for just the same.

Believe in God if you will, and perhaps also a scientific God as well, for a bit of Method, if not any glory, or even conscience as well.

Except for not any "lurking in the shadows" either.

Amen, and next how come for that of such a thing?

Speaking of, and next also glory as well, except for perhaps not any Antichrist either, because if not wrong, science could still be telling the truth,
by making it the Scientific Method itself.

Yes, Premises is perhaps not about any promises either, but except for a broken toe, if not any rainbow, why such a thing for that of science itself?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith

Perhaps wrong right now, except for not any lyrics either, but if perhaps wrong, why such a thing as broken promises as well?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cm_u9BjxahA

Except for "One of those days", of course.

Like "science sells", also how come as well, except for still not any broken promises either, for next also that of telling the truth.

Imaging, and next also a bit of imagination as well, except for not any imaging software either.

Broken software should not be or mean any broken hearts or promises either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctuary

Broken heart, except for not any broken feeling either.

Heck, what if I was possibly stubborn, and was believing that Creation could be for such a meaning as well?

But rather that I could be perhaps silly for that of making it God's place for such a thing as well, and next that of eternity.

Close the door here, and next say heck.

Oh, come on.

Is perhaps hope and expectations next only one such thing, when it perhaps is nothing else.

For this, next a broken heart as well, for next not any God as such either.

What if truth itself perhaps did not matter, like also Logic itself, and it next could be still such a God?

Yes, a God perhaps by means of both sins and next absolution as well, but perhaps what next?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silliness

Translates here from that of Frivolity.

Can you say, or is it possible to say, or perhaps mean, that the Universe could next be the other thing, for next what you could perhaps could mean?

Oh, Love from God, versus any hatred, if you will, and next also any Creation here as well.

You know, the Method of Proof is perhaps about a bit of soothsayers as well, and next for both the Universe, and also those which could be taking part as well.

Bring in the Cavalry, and next also left to choose as well, for that of different possibilities, and next also "Options base" as well, for that of a bit of choice.

Here, both heroic. and a bit of charisma, when listening in at the soundtrack, but is it perhaps about any "Truth" as such?

Of course, or still "When Atheists are laughing at Religion", except for not such a thing either.

Here, both throw away, or a bit of wasteland, are terms which could be used.

Make it rather a Prophet, if not any priest either, and next also a bit of despair as well, except not any hope either.

Posting any sillyness here.

Open up a book, and next "your book as well", if not any Guardian of angel either.

Sorry, but perhaps not making the links here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOkImV2cJDg

Renaissance should next mean "hopeless soul", if not any posting angel either.

The metre is next a bit of lecture stone, if not any novice either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metre

Hold on, and next also a bit of excuse as well, for next also making it a bit of science.

Here "Guardian of Angle or Angles", if not mentioned before.

What if it rather became a twisted foot here, for that of of unlucky. or a bit of uncluckyness, for that of of possible sorrow?

Quack, excpept for still only searching, next for that of life itself.

Oh, am I perhaps supposed to "benefit" from that of science, only because I could be knowing about a famous equation?

Where does the word "sacred" perhaps come from?

Dubious - next Google Translate for such a thing,except for perhaps not any nature either.

Mentioned before, but next that nature could always be having an excuse, but next what, for such a thing?

Enthrall, or enchant, and nexr by means of Google Translate, I do not have anything more right now.

But if rather making it a happy dance, next also scienece also selling itself as well, for what it perhaps is meant to be,
or possibly mentality, for that of also inclination, or attitude.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ash

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingo (animal)

So it goes,exept for not any holds either.

Yes, yes, yes, Superior Being for this, except for not any "fracking God", or Entitty either.

How come?

Oh, why not just shut up?

Any difference between mother and father perhaps, except for not any "motherfucker" either?

Here perhaps the Caesarian section for a bit of things happening, except for not any king either, or stealing the whole show?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarean_section

No.

What if I rather found science to be a bit of intetesting, and next also made up my own mind.

Here losing contents as well.

Guardian of angel next translates into that of "saint" in my opinion.

Next any better here, or perhaps more?

Next, it blew here as well.

http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=8012

Closing the tab using Microsoft Edge, next means everyting as well, meaning Nada.

Except for not any swithcover, I possibly kmow a couple of answers as well, for what I perhaps could be doing.

Grmph!

And here apparently got it fixed the malicious error for that of a garbled mess when launching Google Chrome as the web browser of choice.

Shows up to be an outdated version of Google Toolbar in the browser being the reason for the whole problem, but next unable to tell by only looking.

I had the toolbar in the browser while also using Internet Explorer, so here now the initial page for that of Google, rather than Hotmail, or Microsoft.

Also it could affect search functions as well, in that Bing could be the preferred choice, while I rather could choose to make it still Google.

The only thing missing is that of right clicking on the horizontal and vertical scroll boxes, where Microsoft still gets it better, but next not too bad for the rest.

I also had the pleasure of running a couple of factorization tasks by means of keying in the numbers, except for not launching the application directly.

I did not read the other in much detail, but something like that of science itself for next a cookbook of sorts, and here apparently this word for this.

Also a bit of amusement stories around earlier on, but when next looking, the thread is not there anymore.

But like also a ship itself for setting sail at sea, for next also a bit of travel, also "man overboard" at times as well, in that we could always make a difference between
people for their respective attitude against science, for their sometimes intended belief.

It next becomes the same or regular story, of course, but if you happen to be an atheist, next no such a thing as gods for that of any possible belief either.

Here still either/or, or even neither/nor at times, except for perhaps not thinking of the possible "NOT" either, for that of perhaps no such thing as Monotheism,
regardless of possible attitude you might have, including that of a subject.

Make it "First Blood" for a couple of things, except for not any digging with a shovel either, which next could be continuing forever, next in the same fashion as well.

If rather possible "Contact", you perhaps may not be able to assume any such thing as a "Miracle" either, if or when it possibly could happen, only because it could be science.

Here it now became Microsoft Edge for that of posting, and also that it now became one more problem solved for that of cut and paste, using a line buffer in a database.

Still at least four dead links for that of larger applications on my desktop, but here now able to do a bit of quite good stuff with what I have.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_van_Beethoven

Still the end url on a second line when making a link of the whole thing, but also that it translates into both marvel and prodigy, for that of childhood abilities you possibly might have.

Ugly and nice is perhaps not the same for that of a possible written expression, but next sometimes also the little secret as well, for that of touching, if not feeling,
next for also senses which could be stretched out, in order to touch those things which could be out there.

A random spectator could perhaps be making it both magnificent and glory for that of the celestial sky, if not any magnificence or even stupendous either.

When perhaps so, next not the same as any "Have a nice day" either, because we should already know that Philosophical thinking could be one of the reasons for that of science.

If you rather could be looking at the Scientific Method, it also could be for that of an understanding of science itself, rather than sometimes throwing out any users.

Perhaps "golden middle", rather than any "happen medium", because if you happen to be an astronomer of sorts, you also could be making a guess that Creation also could be such a thing,
or perhaps similar for what it perhaps is meant to be.

Perhaps no such thing as a single sequence for that of numbers only, even when possibly concatenating it, and next also thinking of it as a single whole as well.

If not that above, also that of linking, or fusing, if perhaps not any merging either, because here a red line below the word above.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio

We still could be having the Golden ratio, like also a couple of other things, in order to express or explain numbers which could be part of our daily life,
but also that it could sometimes be Creation myth, for that of doing the same for that of a science which perhaps is not present at all.

Here that of Existence, and also Existence of God, as well, in that both could be rather more Philosophical questions, than perhaps relating to any given numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream

Here perhaps a good example of a subject where it should not be about any Matter Creation, but next perhaps not only a question left for the philosophers next to solve.

Like Question Time in the House of Commons, also Questions and answers here as well, in that neither such a thing is perhaps not about any Logic,
or even Fallabilities either, for next both true and false, if perhaps not anything else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementary_colors

Took a little while at getting at the above, but also that you could be able to see it here as well, for both posting purposes, and next also testing.

My guess is that science could be still having its infallabilities for that of a possible explanation, but should it next be any Religous fallabilities,
for that of possible Belief, or even Faith, except for not any Myths either?

Look around, and we could be having both the leap second of the year, if not making it any leap year either, except for also being able to explain it as well.

About a half year from now, a perhaps little strange date in the calendar, for that of a possible anniversary of sorts, namely November 11, 2018.

Does anyone next know whether this could be perhaps true, or why it could otherwise be so?

Perhaps twelve months in the year, except for not any eleven either, but next you could make it January, and so on, for next that of counting, except for not any 3, 7, or 11 either.

If rather 11 PM in the evening, also that you know that the old watch could be showing so, except for not any passing of time either, next for any superstition.

Sometimes it could be "ready, set, and next go", for that of a meal, except for not any superstition or myth which could also be associated with a Conspiracy which could be around.

But next "out of the blue" as well, and it became an event from nowhere, which next made for a couple of things to happen, and here 9/11 as just such an example.

Perhaps not any smile or laughter, for that of also a bit of tears, for next also a vicious thing happening as well, but except for that, perhaps not any Logic as an issue either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Granularity

Here for sometimes a bit of pieces, when you next do not have all the answers, for also sometimes a bit of rough explanation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_entropy_thermodynamics#The_Second_Law

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_dynamics

Next both Fluid and Fluid dynamics, for that of a bit of Physics this time, except for not any "Man overboard" either, for next a thing you could be able to see in the sky.

If a myth or superstition could show up in order to next also materialize, it could also become part of the Scientific Method for that of thinking as well, in that evidence
should next also follow that of any Proof, or perhaps vice versa.

The world's silliest idea is that of the Universe perhaps teeming with life, and even those who happen not to be scientists, could be knowing such a thing.

Perhaps sometimes basic ingredients for that of life itself, by making it both amino acids, and also water itself, except for not any oceans either, or perhaps volcanism.

Like sometimes "Dance on a Volcano", also that life could be a balancing act on its own, by sometimes hanging in a thin thread.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medicine

Here an old science as well, in that we could be always on the lookout for possible new therapies, except for not still believing in Healing as the possible subject,
when it rather could be about finding a cure for that of Cancer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Médecins_Sans_Frontières

Here for that of an organization of such as well, in that sometimes I could become old only for that of ageing itself, except for not any deceases either.

If still rather Fluids, or that of Thermodynamics here, next that it also could be sometimes a "Wheel of Fortune" as well, and next be coming out of the sky from nowhere.

The old phrase or wording is that science could be perhaps a hard thing to explain, and next also do, if not any Religion for the same either,
which could sometimes be telling about things even better.

Any brown cheese for next that of a cookbook of sorts, except for not any "Chariots of Fire" either, for that of its possible meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chariots_of_Fire

Here at least that of a movie for such a thing, but perhaps not what I wanted for either.

Both the Big Dipper, and also small Dipper in the celestial sky, except for not making it any Ursa Major, or Ursa Minor either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ursa_Major

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ursa_Minor

Like also "Fond of", for that of being honest, and sometimes feel love as well, a tree of Wisdom of sorts, should be made up of the branches and leaves it possesses.

Next make it rather factors instead, for that of endless, or at least different possibilities, and next also a piece of bread, like also piece of cake, for that of possible opportunities.

If sometimes "good luck", if not winning in any lottery either, such luck, when it sometimes happens, could make for a bit of fortune as well.

But if rather have to select, or even make a choice between that of different worlds, next for that of living, in that it could be both the Ice World, and also the desert,
you only could make it two different environments for that of also different possibilities to choose, or perhaps select.

For this you could sometimes count as well, like making it 1, 2, 3... and so on, if perhaps not making it any Sets either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory

Mentioned before for that of a quite interesting subject at hand.

So, is Creationism perhaps not the same as Creation, in that sometimes an animal could be "spinning" a web, next for that of a net.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spider

Next, both that of the Cro-Magnon versus the Neanderthal, for at least ourselves as humans, but next also still the factors which could be making this possible,
for next also that of differences which could also be around.

Both 2 and 3 are prime numbers, for that of factors, except for the first also the only "even" one known.

But next, should it be enough only to count, for that of making a difference, except for not any differentiating either?

We know that these two numbers are different from each other, and next also distinct, but also that they could belong to a set itself, for that of possible numbers,
except for not making it any ice cake, or even plumbing, for such a thing.

The rule of thumb is that if you make it both a turtle and also Achilles, in the running yard, and next let the turtle have a head start, also that Achilles will never be able to catch up.

1/3 = 0.3333.... and so on, and therefore the reason why, and for this also that of Fractals as well, and also the Mandelbrot set, which could be telling about possible infinity.

If rather 3, for that of 0.3333, next also both 9, 27, and 81, for next that of 10 and 100, and here the difference is quite well visible, and you get that of "approximation".

Like a grace of sorts, next for also that of a Prayer as well, perhaps not any Bible in your hand, when next sitting down for having a meal.

If spelling it correctly, a falsification could also be the opposite of any genuine, for next that of a painting, but also that Logic itself could be about possible "absolutes".

Guess what, but even paper could be for a proper use at times, in that it also could be sheets of such, except for not any "refraining from issue" either,
in that we could be still left with that of Logic in order to decide whether or not we could be still alone.

But rather speaking about "Credibility" sometimes, and you could be watching "Independence Day" at times, if not any "Alien" either, for that of a movie,
and next also think, if not "believe" it could be science.

Except for not making it any "Tales of the Unexpected", for that of the Rendlesham Forest Incident either.

Sometimes it could be a hidden meaning for a couple of things, and sometimes it could be a deeper meaning as well, except for not making it both consonants and vocals,
for that of the alphabet itself.

A good example is that of wearing a pair of skates on the first day of freeze, only for next that of threading on thin ice as well, for also that of a threadmill.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Next, guess what, or should I perhaps be telling you a good story for that of next going to sleep, in that you could be having both the spinning Earth, and also neutron as well,
for that of also protons and electrons orbiting each other, next for that of a charge only.

Make it "+", and it next attracts, or rather make it "-" instead, and it could rather repulse, for next that of opposite Forces.

Should it perhaps be the neurons in your brain for that of such a thing, in that it could be still "spinning around"?

A CCD is an acronym for "Charge Coupled Device".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCD

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device

But where is next Cinderella in all of this, for next also making it also an almost endless debate for that of science itself, where it next could also be about God.

Any 90 degree angle in that of a Pyramid, or isosceles triangle, where the angles rather should be 60 degrees for each turn.

"Tell me the answer", and next also possible truth as well, in that it also could be such a thing for that of a story which could be told, for next that of not being alone.

One of the uglier things which you could be confronted with, or perhaps ending with, for that of your life, is that of a stuck neck.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudius

Reumatism and Arthritis is perhaps not the same, like also Leukemia as well, for that of a bit of cancer, because it next could be "Holy Cow" as well at times,
when it rather could be "Dancing with Angels".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leukemia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rheumatism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthritis

And here a bit more of conservative, in that I could be making it Tom Cruise here, for that of a movie, rather than any Erich von Däniken, for that of a similar thing.

Both obsolete for that of old, and next also new, for that of a refurbishment, and next the thought or perhaps funny idea, that I could believe in the Universe as (it) is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady_state

Next, not any "Economic model" either, if perhaps passing along for that of a couple of keystrokes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalism

Which Laws next, for that of also Equations, and we could be having both the Laws of Newton, and also the landscape of "Quintessence", in order to also be telling about Quantum mechanics.

Like black versus white, for that of possible colors, also that of "opposite Forces" for that of elementary particles as well, and next it "sucks" as well,
in that there are things which does not always match each other, or even ryme.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythm

I have previously mentioned the same for that of photons for that of colors as well, except for sometimes making it part of the Strong Nuclear Force, for that of this particle.

Next that it also could be coming from the sun as well, and we could be sensing the heat, except for not making it any infrared either, for that of radiation.

The story should perhaps go that the traveling salesman should be there in order to sell a product, except for not any income either, but here still back at that of Logic here,
in order for that of such a thing being able to tell, and also be making a difference.

You could be having both measure and measurability, except for not any scalar, or scalar product either, except for not the mentioned fact about Creation itself,
where I also could find a "reason" for that of a Creator also being involved.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

Still a quite good article here, for that of the subject, except for perhaps not myself a couple of lines down, for that of also a given "measure" for next the same.

Genesis, as a musical band, could also be making it "Calling all Stations" as well, except for still only the ants of nature, and their anthills, for almost the same thing.

Neither superstition or myth should be about any Logic, in my opinion, but which one is perhaps next better at explaining the possible idea that we perhaps are not alone?

Is Quantum mechanics next only about numbers, for that of counting, or could it rather be about Intervals, for next also be making a difference?

Of course, 0.3333 * 3, is not the same as 0.3333 * 0.3333 * 0.3333 either.

Make it rather a "scientific God", so to speak, and next you could be having still Creation, except for still not seeing the Face of God either.

Of course you could be having Laws and Equations for that of "bits and pieces" as well, in that it could be only part of the whole puzzle,
but next the other possible choice or alternative, could be that of the Bible, or even Ten Commandments.

Like a Christian, and sometimes a Mormon as well, and next also a couple of things which could be enforced, by means of its own free will.

The world of Mathematics could sometimes be a world of numbers as well, and for the same reason also numbers which sometimes do not divide.

Next, speak about a "Perfect World", sometimes, if not any Perfect number either, and you could be back at the Rainbow, next part of the evening sky.

Could you make it that of Eternity, for that of Religion, only a "possibility", or perhaps one possibility among others, because you could be still left with choices?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability_theory

Here, both crocodiles, and also dinosaurs as well, became left out of the whole picture, only because of a low "Probability" for such a thing,
except for not being a natural part of the world, including its history.

So, here the old man using a rod, or stake, for that of his whereabouts, including that of moving around, except for not any stumbling.

We perhaps should know the word or phrase "The Lord is my Shepherd" here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antagonism

Here either being confused, or perhaps misunderstanding, but compare with the traveling salesman for next that of

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dystrophy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscular_dystrophy

and here you could also pretend to be alone as well, next also below the pillow, for also a sense that it could be even more to a couple of things.

Is "writeoff" next supposed to be any Logic as well, in that you also could be throwing away any waste, for next also discarding as well?

Still, Logic, and it could also be telling about "idiots" and geniuses as well, just for the same or similar thing.

NB, or NB! is such an acronym as well, in that it stands for "Nota Bene".

Make it rather a tulip, for that of next a flirt, and also you should know where it should go, for that of colors, except for not any "traveling salesman" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip

Here "wrong", except for not any error either, and you could be still left at Logic, for that of explaining the whole subject.

Really, a free fall, next without a parachute, should not be the same as any "pick a random choice" either, for that of possibilities, in that you always should know the outcome.

Here nature is the ultimate winner, and next also the one picking the choice as well, for that of options which could be available, but next that we could also be making it that of death.

Here again almost the fine print of the wording as well, but not willing to edit that above right now.

But rather that you could be making it an organ in a church for both a substitute and replacement, and next also think that the Julia set could be your beloved friend.

Two eyes next for that of a face, and both eyes could next be blue, except for not any green either, for that of a possible fancy.

If the world is part fools, for that of stupid idiots, and next also a couple of geniuses as well, we perhaps should know the reason, except for not making it any horses either.

The worst thing happening with a climber, is that of entering a vertical wall, but is this next also a "dilemma" of sorts?

Why pick, except for rather "prick", in that it also could be the rod or stake for that of a bit of wander, and next also wandering around as well.

Here also Burl Ives for that of "It is your life, it is mine", or the like, and also that life itself could be both a term and a semester for its possible duration.

Here. the blink of a second, for that of possible flimsiness, if not any esoteric, or chemical process, is being replaced with that of durability, or longevity,
for that of products which could be lasting "forever", like that of a diamond.

There could be a question around what is perhaps meant with that of infinity, except for not the above, for perhaps 0.3333, or the like.

Neither Rembrandt or Picasso was perhaps meaning or pretending a couple of paintings being false, or wrong, for that of their impression,
but next that Logic itself could be telling about the same thing, for that of making it a possible difference.

Is it not true, or perhaps a fact, that nature could be generous for that of its offerings, for for it also could be able to tell?

Why still a couple of secrets around, if perhaps being so?

A classic example for that of 0, for next nothing, in that 1 should next follow, and next -1 also precede, except for not making it any 0.5, or -0.5 either.

My guess is that a "difference" between a stupid idiot, and next a genius, should be that of "quantisizing" such a thing, because it should be about numbers.

Here a bit of sunshine, of course, but also a couple of clouds as well, and next that the sun could still be shining in your face, despite all the clouds.

It perhaps slipped away, but negative numbers could be sometimes making for that of positive numbers as well.

But rather science for that of a purpose, and next also meaning as well, and next we could be counting up the number of intelligent civilizations as well,
without any hesitation at all.

Like both Zalster, and also Grant here, for that of such a thing, next also the madman as well, for that of a scientist, and next "Eureka", I found.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_(word)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eureka_effect

Of course, have a bath instead, and next the telephone rang.

Oh, is backtracking next the same as any backfiring, in that it could still be about the Scientific Method?

My guess is that we could still be looking at Creation for that of such a thing, in that it could also be a product of nature.

But next, rather "Silent Night" as well, in that we sometimes could think that there might be a God, or perhaps divine creator lurking in the shadows,
and next being responsible for everything.

Sorry about that, except for a possible name, but you could sometimes be making it "platt science" for a couple of things.

Here, perhaps not any famous equation either, but perhaps rather a wording, in that it could be a couple of famous words by Einstein,
for which I do not have right now.

Should I next blame a way of thinking for such a thing, rather that he could still be an Atheist?

Jesus could be still having some twelve disciples at his side, and next perhaps not any "trampling" either.

If these words, like a couple of other ones as well, could be that of scientsists, next which Bible for such, if perhaps not any?

With all respect, and next also alpha and omega for such a thing, except not any dirty tricks either, in that it could still be a template for that of both Laws and Equations,
in order to next explain nature.

If a book could be having some 4,000 pages, next each page could be that of a slice of bread as well, for next also thin.

But next salute, except for not any "Heil" either, for that of Isaac Newton, and his discoveries of gravity, and next think that we know everything.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyslexia

Here it sometimes could happen for such a thing, but is next any Quantum mecanics the same as any "throw aboard", for next also a bit of soup as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gynaecology

Fine, but what about a Stradivarius instead, for next that of a violin, because here perhaps not the "end of the game" either, for next that of Philosophy.

You could be making it still the Scientific Method, of course, but next also a bit of anticipation as well, in that it could be

You know, two or more different shelves, for next both that of antique or old, except for not that of any current events, for that of real life,
and you could be making it both different books, and also storage methods as well.

"Here I am", next for that of any music, and next any "heresay" either, for that of the Bible, because here still two eyes in a single face, and also two people could be
facing each other, next for that of different truths, if not any personalities.

Here that of one ladder for that of intelligence, and next one ladder for that of conscience as well, and eventually it becomes the grave for the whole thing, and next the digger.

The only reason why you could be having high rise buildings, is because of their height, but next that manure could be one thing, and also a gift by God just another.

Speaking of God, and next Eureka as well, in that we could also be making it different levels of intelligence, and also conscience as well.

So, perhaps a "trim" for that of a haircut, except for not any SIQS for that of any numbers either, and you could be left still to decide.

Lilke dung, also manure as well, if not any vice versa, but next that we could "pretend" the Universe for what it could be, or perhaps mean,
except for not making it any Laws, or even elementary particles of the whole thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument

Here a nice pair of articles, each for their respective meaning, or purpose.

Here empty bottle right now, and I will be in bed.

Except for "Biggest blunder of my whole life", if I forgot to say, here in at 57 minutes past overtime.

Sorry about that, but my browsers are borking right now, and sometimes unable to get at contents, including streaming playback being listened at.

But when next looking for the tab, it is lost in the crowd, because here both Internet Explorer 11, Microsoft Edge, and also the Chrome web browser,
which fell out of use, because of an installation problem.

Choosing to make a new purchase, I perhaps should have been looking for the previous download, because I was able to find it in my list.

Anyway, one of the few remaining flaws on a partition containing quite much, so perhaps not too much complaining about.

Except for that, is borking the same as barking, like "bark, bark", because here I was a bit of childish, and next was thinking about the Swiss Alps.

Everything for science, it seems, and sometimes even that gets lost in the crowd as well, for what we perhaps could be doing.

For this, also a thought about the Scientific Model, and next also the way forward, for what perhaps the eye could next see, and also the mind catching up with,
for that of the usual or regular story around, for that of a science still without a belief, but perhaps rather a notion, in that there sometimes could be those part of,
or perhaps belonging to a cult of sorts, who next could pretend to be "believers".

Here thinking about the people belonging to the "UFO Community", in the small hours, and also the fact that their belief still seems to be recognized,
in a given fact, for what it could represent.

But also that there also could be more regular scientists as well, and next grasping such a fact that perhaps not being alone in space, for that of humankind,
is perhaps not that easy either.

My guess is that those people pretending to be believers, are not necessarily believers in gods either, at least not always, but rather that there could be still two
different environments for that of the scientific community, where one part chooses to believe, while the other perhaps not.

So here perhaps it could be formulated slightly different as well, but also that when it comes that that of an "acknowledgement", for that of a couple of things,
the reason could perhaps be still that of above, namely that some people choose to "believe", while others rather choose to rather "trust", for next also making it science.

The melody being performed on December 1 each year, or perhaps later, is that of "I wish you a Merry Christmas".

Next because also so, because it always could be so, and for this also a bit of happiness as well.

Perhaps you did not read my mind either, but next that sometimes it could be Santa Claus making a visit, except for not any "Saint" either.

Like inflation versus deflation for that of good versus bad times when it comes to the Economy, any Santa Claus making a visit through the chimney is perhaps a welcome guest,
only because he is bringing a couple of gifts, and is a symbol of good.

But sometimes it becomes that of losing grip as well, and it becomes that of perdition, or damnation, if not a speedy fall to the ground either.

Like the "Oath of faithfulness", or allegiance on its own, such a thing could be that of good on its own, because also mercy could be such a thing.

But still the wrong book here, in that it perhaps could be Religion, rather than science, but also that we could sometimes find ourselves in the dark as well,
for that of the latter thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemasonry

If a member of a Freemasonry, or the like, you sometimes get consecrated, or inaugurated in that of the "inner circle" sometimes, depending on age and experience.

Here that of wisdom or knowledge at times as well, or even your statutory or mandatory rights, next for that of deciding.

Step on your toes, if perhaps not mine, and it could sometimes hurt, and here thought perhaps, if not a question, is the way such a thing is being dealt with,
by means of a given practise, except for perhaps not any science itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll

Here it perhaps became mentioned as well, and next still also a writeoff or rejection as well.

Funny, but next both depreciation, and amortization are both words related to that of Economy, so here the better word being wished for.

But next I do in fact know about the difference between both Bess Armstrong, and next also Tom Selleck, for that of those daring, if not any Daredevils either,
and next those things which could be science, and next that of Fluids, or the like.

But next, perhaps still the chemist or physicist in the laboratory, dealing with a couple of test tubes, for that of acids, if not making it any ball lightning either,
and we could still be back at questioning both people, and also nature, for still a couple of other things.

Give it a shot, and next also a long shot as well, in that sometimes we could be wishing for natural phenomena coming our way, and next also the Human Face of sorts as well,
which perhaps is not our own either.

Look at a sitting President, and he could pretend to be "dumb", if not any dumber, or dumbest either.

"If I were a rich man", of course, and next I could be strolling on the Moon, only because I happened to be a scientist, or perhaps even an explorer.

Here still the difference perhaps, except for not the fact that results could also be about achievements as well, except for not making it any economical gain either.

Have a rifle placed in your hands, if perhaps not anything else, and it could backfire, if next pulled the trigger.

If it happens to be a big gun, or even cannon, you most likely would be dead, but the same could happen with a ricochet as well.

There could be both verses and rhymes around for next "I want to believe", or the similar, except for perhaps not any "Love from God" either.

One example here, is Martin Luther King, who next wanted to be free, and next a free man, from that of slavery.

Next hope, and also hope for a better world as well, and we could still be having the UFO community around, for that of such a thing as well,
except for not any science on its tail either, telling that it is perhaps is enough, or at least may not be true.

Is it perhaps scientists, for that of science, next the responsibility here, for next perhaps claiming any responsibility either, but rather "squeezing" those who happen
to believe into the dark, only because they could be wrong?

If perhaps only good for everything, next also love as well, including that of a notion of God as well.

But if not wrong, science could still not be there for such a thing, namely that of Religion, for that of possible belief, which could next be such for that of God himself.

The last thing a "believer" would perhaps do, is dismissing a couple of facts relating to own, personal belief.

Should it next be the responsibility of science at doing such a thing, only because it also could be objective as well, when it comes to possible inclination?

Or should we rather throw out those who could be "believers", only because it could be about the Scientific Method, and next that this method could be showing up to be true?

If this project happens to be a "quest" for that of God, only because it could be carried out in a "scientifical way", you probably know the answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodology

For this, we do not need to laugh, only carrying out science as usual, hoping that it works.

Back in the morning.

Yes, "nitty", if not any night either, for that of "Good night" as well.

"Nitty gritty", perhaps and next also my sandals as well.

Here that of the priest, as usual, if perhaps not the Pope either, but at least he is carrying the Bible in his hands, and is next preaching,
if perhaps not proclaiming his message, of sorts.

Is next "statutory rights" the same as a possible freefall?

If not wrong, we could sometimes be having a church by means of science, except for not making it any Mormons either.

One example of such, is the Christian Science Monitor, where I really did not like the babble of the past, until some recent words being heard,
which perhaps made me change my mind.

accommodate
cater / catering

Here Google Translate makes the opposite translation for a word being keyed in, and it becomes that of "refute", for that of also oppose,
when I rather could make it once again the opposite, for that of also meaning.

Everyone knows that the last thing a priest will do, is shaking hands with a scientist, and perhaps not only because of knowledge alone.

For me personally, or perhaps myself, also a difference between a "knock-knock", and next a knucklehead, for such a thing,
because a theoretical physicst could be quite concernered about, and next also dealing with elementary particles, and also their respective Equations.

Next, make it both Myth and Superstition, if you like, and perhaps not the Scientific Model either, but rather a possible assumption about ourselves being only part
among others, for next also

in that we could be making it the Universe next to ourselves, and in such a way also thinking that we are only a part.

I looked around in the past or previous, thinking that I found out about both Cosmological part, and also evolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_constant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle

A couple of videos here, but needs checking here.

Here the question "Are we alone", and for this perhaps "nonetheless" as well, if not any withstanding, or nowithstanding.

If perhaps both perdition and damnation above, is it or this because it benefits, or gains the Scientific Method, or perhaps could be a model, for that of thinking?

Beware the wolf, but at almost 55 years of age, I could perhaps be a lucky man of sorts, but is this because of white or brown cheese, or even a salad in the morning?

We all know that the worm is making earth, for that of soil as well, hollow.

But next still hungry, and it could start eating itself, next by means of the tail.

Similarly, both spin, spun, spun, for that of both protons, and electrons around.

Is it possible to define laughter itself, next for that of "Atheists versus Religion"?

Or should we rather still believe in both the hollow Moon, and also the flat Earth, as the answer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic

Here, insert the key in your car, for next starting up, and next driving around as well.

Look around, and next synagogues for even that of Israel, for that of also a marketing place of sorts, where also it also could be business of sorts, or perhaps carried out.
for that of a market.

But rather a holy place for both, and next also the "Holy Shrine" as well, rather than perhaps a synagogue.

Needs checking here as well.

But rather you are supposed to tell me, rather than perhaps not, because if it became the tub of clay, rather than water, you could end up becoming stuck.

Lose control, and it could become a haywire, but what if it rather became still the Scientific Method, only in order to tell that perhaps a thing is not true?

Yes, yes, yes, endless debate, perhaps, in that some people could think that we perhaps could or might be visited, except for not making it a natural phenomenon either.

The phrase "God is good" is perhaps there, execept for not any paraphrasing either, and next thinking that it rather could be the Devil, for that of murky or sinister.

Except for perhaps not knowing about any Monastery either, we should know the coat of the abbott, and also its color.

So, like "Make a chance on me", also "keep a chance" as well, in that sometimes it could be easy, while other times hard.

Sometimes a Judgment day on its own, rather than a conviction alone, but next also a sentence as well.

Or perhaps rather "easy come, easy go", except for not any hard either, because again that both Equations, as well as Laws, could be telling about nature at times,
exept for not making it any particularly hard or difficult either.

regulation

Knock-knock, for at least making a couple of links here, and next also a summary.

Here looking for a better word, but a regulation should next mean mandatory as well.

Oops, pop it up in some way or fashion, and next you could also be preaching an idea for at least Religion, if not any options, or possibilities, for that of science.

Here reverting back, and editing anew, and I do not know it if gets wrong here.

To be more clear, 2+3 is perhaps more easy than just E=mc2, but next only because the latter is an Equation, while the first is an arithmetic one, dealing with numbers.

Next, key it in wrong, if perhaps not any listening either, and you could be having the Ten Commandments, except for not making it any "Messenger" either.

If scientistst could always make it a difference for that of just Logic alone, next also by means of both falsifying, for that of falsification, and next also genuine as well,
at least we should know about Logic.

Yes, sad, and except for life itself, I could also be dead, and next also buried in a grave as well.

If perhaps so, would this next be true as well, and also proven, by means of the Scientific Method?

What if possible alternatives left with me with no choices altogether, like "Options Base", of sorts, or even a play of a games?

Or perhaps rather Dirty Harry here, only because he could be dirty, rather than just ugly.

Here both the cardboard, and the drawer as well, in that you could be thinking not not be just lucky, but in fact right.

Charles Darwin could be making it "Selection of the fittest", of sorts, not only because it could be an option method, but rather a result of a consequence.

But next, step by step, if not any stepwise refinement either, but next you perhaps could assume "clause" for that of "Causality", and next also assume God being the
responsibility for everything.

Here. Creation versus Creator, and next "prick-prick", what is next, or perhaps even more to say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning

Why still only Orson Welles for such a thing, or perhaps even an idiot as well, in that I could sometimes find nature amusing for at least its own part,
or what it perhaps is supposed to mean.

Should it next be still two different branches here, in that one could be a "Stairways to Heaven" of sorts, next leading to God, while the other perhaps still science?

Think of it as 2+3 as an answer, and next perhaps not "how clever you are", just for that of thinking.

Here a group of sorts could perhaps be claiming responsibility, while perhaps a notion, or thought, could be an axiom, or postulate.

Again, it fell off here.

Or perhaps pink, rather when it could be scarlet, for next also Pink Panther as well, for that of the sunset.

"Rise'n shine", and next a couple of quarks, for that of protons, when we next could make it both Hydrogen and Oxygen, and next also water.

Except for not the Scientific Method, of course, which could be making it "Smoke on the water", and next also a bit of disillusionism, for only thinking about


Theoretical possibilities

Any difference between possibilities, and probabilities?

Yes, make it Num Lock, and you could also be dumb fooled as well, if not any heart.

Wish you, and next also a Merry Christmas as well, but next "you dare" coming up with such a thing.

Jumpstart, eh, and next start reading all over, at least for what I could say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

Not forgetting that little thing, except for perhaps not me any stupid either.

Hmm, so perhaps the traveling salesman right now, for both that of consonants and vocals in the alphabet.

Next, give me a laugh, only because of a simple letter itself, namely "c".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longevity

Or perhaps rather duration, but here it helps a lot.

"Fasten your seatbelts", of course, except for not any "Ready, steady, cook" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure

Mentioned before, but also that I would have an article for that of Plausibility itself, or alone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forging

Dang, except for not any web page forged either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterfall

"Do you remember a day in September"?

Needs checking here.

Keying in "Elimination method", and it does not take it here, and perhaps mentioned before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mentorship

So, a melody like "Hopelessly in love", and next perhaps I could be rewarded as well, or perhaps looking for a business.

Make it rather 1, 2, 3, and next also polygon and hexagon as well, if not any butter on bread either.

Here the word clever or subtle, which for some reason still translates into "knock-knock" here.

So, perhaps a bit of skin cancer, if you do not mind, and next also benign as well, if not any evil either.

Toilet.

Order, order.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Orwell

Sniff.

Everyone knows that a pelican is having wings, while a dromedar just none.

Is it because of only a story being told, or is it because of Creation of sorts?

Give me a laugh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomenclature

Fail, and next perhaps a reason for the whole thing as well.

The only reason for why you could speak, are some "naughty" words, for that of literals, next "a" through "z".

Make it still "qwerty" of sorts, and you could be still understood, except for not lying any dead, and perhaps in your grave.

We know that finding possible aliens could be about the elimination method, and next silly me, versus clever you, of course.

See, if I try making a cake, perhaps not a crystal ball either, but I could make it a dough of sorts, next lying on a piece or chip of sorts,
and next trying to make it altogether, like still that of a piece.

Next, perhaps funny of sorts, in that I could be having a line with that of an arrow at one end or the other, and next ask "which way".

Oh, "e --> mc2", of course.

But next you perhaps are laughing of the crystal ball, in that perhaps no such thing as Creator versus Creation, or even "Creator --> Creation".

Should tell, when scientists are confronted with such a question, next "what if", for such a thing.

Anyway, so no God chose to pull, or wear of his coat, next in order to be a scientist (?)

Oh, catch you later, but if perhaps this question, next that it became answered for such a thing as well.

Is it possible to include the "bad thinngs" into the good things, or should you still exclude it altogether?

Trip. trap, feeling good, and next 0, 1, or even 2, versus that of infinity, and next that I could still be a citizen of Earth.

Take it or leave it, it you will, but makes me think that the whole thing was perhaps "Crated" in one sorts or fashion, next with respect to another thing.

Tell me right, next tell me wrong as well, and also an Oath for such, and next perhaps "wrong" as well, in that it could perhaps be easy.

Perhaps bad, or poorly explained, but compassion, and also charity, could next be different words for that of love, except for perhaps not any dignity either.

If not wrong, entering a "Tabletop Mountain" of sorts, perhaps is not telling about the Universe either, so where next is the difference?

Yes, set forth, and it is next set forwards, if not any backwards either, except for perhaps only perimeters only.

Yeah, wonderiing about both black and blue, for that of a notion, next that Logic should perhaps be at least telling.

So, quantity means perhaps quality as well, and next also by means of a "finesse"?

Quanitssence.

Tell me about the white versus black tangents on the piano, and next needs checking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintessence

Or perhaps "leave me alone", or something like that, in that next I gave you a lesson for that of you to also teach,
but next perhaps "adhere" as well?

Ah, cheerful (of sorts), but what if this was perhaps God?

But rather luck strikes (of sorts), and next also pertinent.

Why so?

Is being a priest perhaps a reason or excuse for just believing?

What if I rather went the difficult path, and perhaps ended up in such a way myself?

Is, or should this still be science?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technocracy

Next, for good and for bad.

Next, translate "salient", if you will.

Oh yeah, outspokeen perhaps, because I could be having the answers, rather than an illiterate, and next also an astronomer of sorts.

The fun thng here is perhaps that the Scientific Method could perhaps explain everything, including Religion, but next also "Proof" as well.

One reason we could perhaps make it a difference, next for that of ourselves versus others, is that of dreams, which also could be possible.

Huh, 50 % chance for that of life near or against Denebola, (beta Leonis), and next you make a laugh of the whole thing.

Question both red, white and black, except for not any pink either, and perhaps a bit wrong, in my opinion.

Rather question that of God, and next also "you dare", in my opinion, because you could also question infinity itself.

Trying hard here.

Should have been better, or perhaps more clearer in the previous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBwS66EBUcY

Think of, and next also think of it as well, next perhaps I could be a scientist of sorts.

Is it not an ugly thing that perhaps Religion could be explained as such, or "per se", but next that science perhaps could not do the same,
or perhaps be doing the same thing?

Question perhaps such a thing, and not necessarily, or except for that of Logic itself, and I perhaps did so, and not because of the Bible when waking up either.

It becomes like, or almost, that of counting up as well, for next that of Religion, against ourselves, and next our place in the Universe as well.

Look up, and next in the space as well, for that of also Cardinality, and also distribution as well, which could be telling about a common relationship between stars.

Mass-equation formula, and here needs checking, except for not directly on my mind either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass–energy_equivalence

Except for not the elephant either, together with its dung, found it here,

OK, or anyway, who is perhaps smart or clever here, except for any scientist either.

Compare with "Ordnung must sein", next also "Law and Order" as well, for that of science still to prevail.

If you do not mind, perhaps not why, but rather "how", in that for the existence of the Universe, and next also its possible destiny.

"Blink of an eye", and next the car for the thash, or wastebin, and next not "far" from the true,
'
Guess what, but still science could be "prevailing", by next standing on its own feet.

Any wrong, or wrongdoing, and next perhaps a "conclusion" as well.

So, why roses, when next still also tulipans as well, and here silly me, next only questioning the possibility of God?

Try me, and next perhaps the answer a little down here, because not in my face either, for such a thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqiOjpT6wLQ

Same goes, easy science, and next also try "me" as well.

How come?

Oh, your reality show perhaps, except for not mine.

...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqiOjpT6wLQ

Roger Dangerfield (by means of his name only).

Think of it as number 2 (P1 = 2) as not only utterly nonsense, but next perhaps science only.

Next I could also be "proclaiming" God, also because I could be also mastering scinence, if not any "Master of sorts".

Think of it as "The sun ever shines", for that of also "never ever diamond" as well, and next what's your pick, for next that of choice?

Or to make it more clever or straightforward, next your pick, because also your next choice as well.

Ever heard about a random pick, or choice, and next what is the opposite?

Dang, should it be the "possibilities" or options of nature, because it is next hard, or should it rather be a "random choice", because next God's word?

In my opinion, no such thing as P3 = 127 for that of infinity, but next where is wisdom being considered, in order to bring a possible, or straightforward answer?

The problem is that you could be questioning such a matter, next from that of Creation itself, but perhaps not when a Creator is being concerned.

Hmm. the philosophical way perhaps.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqiOjpT6wLQ

Dang, for perhaps my finishing line here.

C:\Users\yafu>yafu-x64
2897... hah ^C

C:\Users\yafu>yafu-x64 "factor(2821)"


fac: factoring 2821
fac: using pretesting plan: normal
fac: no tune info: using qs/gnfs crossover of 95 digits
div: primes less than 10000
Total factoring time = 0.0145 seconds


***factors found***

P1 = 7
P2 = 13
P2 = 31

ans = 1

Or, did we have the question of credit perhaps, meaning Cinderella?

Perhaps I do know the question as well, but do I perhaps have the answer.