Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Author	Message
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1926575 - Posted: 25 Mar 2018, 17:36:52 UTC Last modified: 25 Mar 2018, 18:23:36 UTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTC74D_tzvI Ended up somewhere in the middle of the playback, and next continuing where it left off. Not finished with the second part of the text, but except for the dinner from the malfunctioning fridge, also that meaningful versus meaningless should perhaps be telling the answer, except for not only about a given wording either. This because you could make up a meaning, and next also a mind for that of the Universe, and next a sense of it all, except for making it any such for the Universe, when next making it meaningless. In this sense, perhaps adding to the notion here that there is a Creator behind everything, and that this should also mean God. Better have the coffee first. ID: 1926575 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1926607 - Posted: 25 Mar 2018, 20:51:43 UTC Last modified: 25 Mar 2018, 21:09:26 UTC Uninstalled the graphics drivers again, and had new ones downloaded from nVidia a short while ago. Noticing that the recent driver in question ended up with a blank, or white icon for the executable file, it apparently still runs, so here back at the undervolt problem. One possible option is pulling the graphics cards and replacing them with the two others, which are big "server" cards, for that of such. One mounted inside the box which had it all installed, but next suffered a hard finger on the motherboard, bending one of the internal USB ports. It still beeps, and the manual is only available in electronic form, so here no solution yet found. But with 11 GB of graphics RAM, it is a tempting thing to do, except that the undervolt is for both the 3.3 V and 5 V right now. Pulling the Bluetooth module during the process, I knew beforehand that this was not the reason here. Temperature appears nominal, but I can not have the airflow installed, because of the large processor fan itself, with each RAM module on opposite side. Not Seti@home related, but a large number broke a short while ago, adding to our knowledge, while yet another still has some more to go. But rather for that of the mentioned link, and that of sometimes making it children of ourselves, for the fact that we perhaps may not be alone in space, despite a possible attitude regarding the subject. Perhaps it was empty space yesterday, or the day before, but it now appears that some steps are being taken, in order to bring us home where we next belong, and perhaps for now, in the celestial sky for this. Like row your boat, also one step forward, if not any backwards either, for that of backtracking, and it also becomes such a thing for science as well, in that it once again could become a new day, while also being able to look back, and next for a better time which perhaps ended up previously. If rather "Wish you were here", also almost there, if not any always either, for perhaps that of a world perhaps in front of us, which we do not always see. Similarly that of factors for that of limits and thresholds as well, in that you always could climb a stairs for that of a wall, and next also conquer a mountain as well. Once upon the time, perhaps, and next it becomes the question of whether we are alone in space. Next either still unanswered, if perhaps not already so, and here I really do not know. "Run like hell", and next forever, except for not a needed Proof for a couple of things, which could be making facts for that of fiction. Edit: Reading a little, and next getting it that of a punctuation mark should be the correct. ID: 1926607 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1926626 - Posted: 25 Mar 2018, 23:12:23 UTC Last modified: 25 Mar 2018, 23:32:23 UTC Trying to read a bit around here instead. Launching the Manager, I restarted two PrimeGrid LLR tasks. The preferences could be set for CPU only, but again a bit hot in here as well. I could try making for a download of new tasks, but likely it could start up by next failing altogether. Like lovely, if not any beautiful, sometimes bad or miserable as well, except for still two eyes only for that of seeing, and next also to the end of space. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_electron_transition Here that above for another posting, but here thinking more about spaceships. Debunk, or whatever, and perhaps so for that of any dinosaurs, when we know that it could be part of history. Supposedly still the Method of Proof for a couple of things, except for still also science. Both "Lucy" and also Missing Link, could be making for such a thing itself, except for not any Comprehension which could be possible, or sometimes needed. Like running the 100 meter, you could fall already at the start, and for such a reason, you will never make it to the finish. Like happy, also glad as well, except for not liking the latter word, and next that a sequence also could be making for a sequential event as well. Slipping past or by, his name is John Lenard Walson here. https://www.facebook.com/luna.moon.1829 Again it next also happens, and the fact that numbers could be for its own purpose, except for not any Comprehension, which could be such for that of the Universe. "Trust your feelings, Luke", and perhaps not any science either, but except for perhaps a couple of words one way or another, we could still perhaps make it science for both, in order for next that of "Trust", if not any working principle either, for that of possible facts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust_(emotion) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinister Perhaps no such thing as a happy day here, except for still the intelligent part of the whole thing missing, and next for that of a message for such. Hope you catch the meaning here, except for perhaps the need for adding more to the subject. ID: 1926626 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1926640 - Posted: 26 Mar 2018, 1:33:05 UTC Last modified: 26 Mar 2018, 1:59:55 UTC Except for pushing the Update button first, for that of downloading new tasks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method A revisit back here, except for the two last beers in the fridge, and here pulling the dinner beverage first, because of its lighter color on the bottle. Not remembering the precise words, but something like "Let go loose, Luke", for next that of pulling the trigger. But again doing so, because of not the Emperor making a fact that Luke could possibly be afraid, but rather that a Manifestation of sorts, also could be such a thing for that of nature. If this is what we are supposed to believe, or perhaps taking for granted, next nice, if perhaps still not such a thing as proving, when it also could be disproving. Forgot that of skeptics in the previous, when it only became that of debunking, but I did not have it in front of me. Assumedly Intelligence should mean life as well, if not vice versa, so this could also become a question here. But if rather "Wonders of nature", because it could also mean splendid as well, why not such a thing for that of the Universe itself? Here perhaps that of being attached to a project, and next also assigned to a task, and next also a bit of work to do, but next also gasp for that of also grasping, and next the enormity of space next for that of volume, except for still its splendor and magnificence. "Wonderous stories", by Yes, and I do not have the link here. By name only, he could be known as Dull, and next also perhaps boring as well. "Trip trap", and here the ending was perhaps added as well, for that of clogs, except for not making it any ring of fire, for that of sometimes wheels as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Process For that of a chain of events, and sometimes also a sequential event as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spawn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spawn_(biology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spawn_(computing) Here for that of Instantiation again, and next that it could be for the whole Universe. If rather "in referral with", next that science is still perhaps not any Religion either, but next the question of which one could supposedly bow to the other, for that of possible credibility, if not making it any "Trust" either, or possibly "adherence". If not the long line either, perhaps still only the hairy creature from alpha Centauri here, and next for that of a similar "Belief". Guess what, but except for a couple of long legs for a couple of people, (and here losing it again, except for perhaps meant to be funny). Catching the last beer in the fridge in the meantime, next given permitted time. In the meantime, translates for real, into that of concept, when using Google Translate for next that of "term". Guess it next becomes wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity Making it perhaps slightly different here, or perhaps other, for that of the latter link, because here a dead end for that of "Conceptual reality". Here perhaps not any Faith either for that of any "Shut up", and next also a badge for such, but next that enumeration could still be about computing, except not any science. Smile, and next for the hidden camera as well, in that it next could be words only, and next also for their respective contexts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_Beings One among many such, and some also mentioned in the past, except for not still making it God for the whole context. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Script https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scripting_language Holy cow, and next also the Bible for such a thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_manuscript So, next you have one piece of bread, and put one fried egg on top, for that of your breakfast. Next not any "give and take", for that of "take and give" either, but rather that you could be having one filled up shelf, and next an empty one, and want to move it altogether, and next it also stacks up. Move along, and you could also be doing so next, except for not any drive away either, or even a passage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psalms Yes, stupid me except for not any stupid fool, or even enumeration either, in that even infinity should be for a given context, and not being measured or compared against something else. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_reality Except for not any "Orks" either, also the word immense, for that of immensely, if not any measure or immeasure for such a thing, making it immeasurability. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Leap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_electron_transition Next, oh so funny! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tract https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funnel Next same procedure as above. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime Ends up a bit wrong at first perhaps, but next giving a thought about whether it is perhaps a way in, when it also could be a way out, except for not any Hawking radiation either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation Like a step, also a leap, and next a giant leap for mankind, except for not any science sells either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dystrophy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talent Except for still only words, next also meaning as well, in that infinity should always mean infinity, and next Eternity for that of Eternity, at least for that of words. Jesus Christ was perhaps feeding the hungry in the desert, except for not letting any children alone either. But next, if not any similarly, also that all roads could be leading to Rome, except for not any trap either, for next also that of possible "root causes". If rather the forbidden fruit, next the Garden of Eden as well, and next also a fictional, or fictitious, if not any conocted story either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion Next what is perhaps meant with "Belief", if next also making it "Faith"? Should it perhaps be "A Clockwork orange" here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clockwork_Orange https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_linnet Here a bird from nature, and also mentioned before. But next, on and on, and so forever, for that of making it a gaussian score, and for this still also in the mud, if not any vain or limbo either, for that of credibility itself, because it also could be about such a thing, and next for a given purpose. Back later. ID: 1926640 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1927002 - Posted: 29 Mar 2018, 2:05:49 UTC Last modified: 29 Mar 2018, 2:07:06 UTC Ended up on column two in the buffer here on a line after a bit of cut and paste being made. Perhaps an old error of sorts, but needs a checkout here. Thanks! ID: 1927002 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1927004 - Posted: 29 Mar 2018, 2:19:22 UTC Last modified: 29 Mar 2018, 2:34:01 UTC Or perhaps wish you all the best could have been sufficient, but at least a bit of good wording. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3A-lJQlrmk Perhaps not any nonsense versus scrupulous either, but still the fact that I am living in a materialistic Universe, where my only faith is that of God. Faith is perhaps about Belief, except for not any Moral either, because either "Run like hell" as usual, looking for the intelligent signal, or rather sing a song, and next in bed with a couple of dreams. I still believe in Creation, but next that God supposedly should be still that of Faith, because it also should be about Belief. Morality is perhaps one thing on your "lest", if not any indignity or sins either, for that of losing the point. But rather that sins should come first, because it also should be about indignity, or what ever, except for any dirty tricks or the like, or even the notion of Hell. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absurdity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Function Again, rewinding back the tape here, because I will try getting new tasks tomorrow, for that of a break right now, and also the same for other running tasks. But next no point of swearing any obedience either, because then you also could literally throw dirt in the face of someone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegiance Like the spare or reserve football player, also the goalkeeper for much the same as well, and next whether or not any science is for that of a purpose, when it next could rather be about your mind. If perhaps still about evolution, next perhaps so for which purpose, and we could be back at the Laws of nature. Uncertainty could next make us choose, if still not leaving us undecided, for that of a couple of factors. Make it rather an Equation, when it also could be about Laws, and next also the fact that nature could be having the upper hand, only by telling such a thing. The possible debate, where you could be left to choose one thing for another, could be making for possible inconclusives, and here again losing it. extrapolate Making it two or more on each side, by just pulling a rope, and you next stretch out, except for not agreement at all, just only a competition. If wording itself could rather be about step for step of sorts, only for that of a possible conclusion, or perhaps the even better. We know that a slip of a hand along a steep or vertical wall, should make for a Consequence, namely that of subsequent death. Next perhaps death itself is not any mind boggling issue either. Make it rather screw up, for also that of screwed up, and next that even infinity could be only part of the puzzle, or perhaps scheme, except for making it any Eternity itself. But next rather grasp a couple of things, because it could be about Comprehension, except for making it still the question whether it is possible science. Does life evolve next to other stars, only because there could be planets, or is evolution perhaps the springboard for that of a better world, which next could make for possible Comprehension? Except for any "slip your tongue" either, next perhaps not "so it goes" either, only for making it rather evolution, and next also a fact of life. If perhaps so, what is the reason for evolution? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason I still think it is quite good here, for that of a possible explanation. Play hide and seek if you will. and next perhaps for both, if not any Perdition either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perdition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_Hell https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damnation Anyway, or perhaps OK, and enough means Like fiddle itself, next also Religion in one hand, and also Theology as well, except for not still making it any science. Perhaps rather the fact that holding a glass between your fingers, still needs a firm and also steady hand, except for also the fact that sometimes believers need to meet scientists, and next also a bit of practioners as well, next in the door. Next nonsense for that of Religion, if perhaps not any science either, but if perhaps so, is this for that of Belief itself? Supposedly Religion is still not science, except for not any teaching of a lesson either, for that of "teach, taught, taught". But rather that scientists are sometimes "asking" a couple of questions, next in order for that of possible answers. Next, perhaps a famous scientist with the name of Einstein, is coming up with a famous Equation, and next also a "rip off" as well, because it perhaps is not about any Faith. Perhaps still a difference between happyday, as well as possible indignity as well, because it next should be about any indulgence versus difference either. Like sail on the sea, next perhaps on your own as well, except for not "He is sailing" either, or perhaps "Row your boat". Here rather a bit of a scientist for that of a possible scapegoat, if perhaps not any science either, except for at least a "Faceless coward", for that of humiliation itself. Like the previously mentioned "Ambiguity", also that of meaning versus meaningless as well, and next a notion that we could be making it a Creator for the whole thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden_of_Eden Next "Witch witch" for that of also a witch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fondue Next perhaps not any fond of either, except for a Fondue. Given still rather Heaven and Hell, and next on Earth as well, why perhaps the reason of "believing" in a couple of Equations, next in order to understand the Universe? "In the beginning, God created the Universe", and next it became the words of the Apollo astronauts as well, for that of their mission to the Moon. Next perhaps not any "malicious" intent, or perhaps malign either, because it next could also be about Hell as well, except for still the world of Heaven, which God next created. Did I perhaps whisper it earlier on, namely the possible fact that both Matter Creation and Creation myth, could be about science itself, except for not making it any God either? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact So, here I rather am the "troll" of sorts, for that of not only making it E=mc2, for a couple of things, but also that of Instantiation as well, in order to make it the whole thing back at the start. Perhaps still only Matter itself for such a thing, except for not any "daemons" either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster Any such thing that perhaps credibilty "sucks"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility Next sardins for that of dinner, except for not any rice either, for that of both sunrise and moonrise. Perhaps not any applause either, but we rather could make it applied technology, and also Methodology, for a couple of things. Always face to face, if not only sometimes either, and you could also be straightforward as well, except for not facing any wall either, except for perhaps the Church. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology Except for perhaps a set of normative beliefs, also still that of a couple of rules as well, which next could make it into Equations as well, for that of science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicative https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicative_expression https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nocturne https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absoluteness Look, when I perhaps make it a siesta, it is not for that of calling my day either. Splendor supposedly means magnitude as well, if not any gracious, or graciously either. Perhaps still "Our Father" only, next for that of a meal, except for not any "Thank you" either, when next finished. Tell me about a white star, and perhaps not such a thing either, except for blue star Rigel, next in Orion. Here that of Easter right now, and because of that, bying a steak in a net of sorts, which perhaps is not any mesh either, like also not a Both the ovaries, for that of women, like that of the testicles, for that of men, are both for that of functionality, next no more. Next, open up your mind instead, because it could be about the Bible, except for not any spiritual event happening either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth Should peas be the most important thing, like also rice, when finally settling down, and next for that of a beer instead? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehension What is still meant by Comprehension? Should it perhaps be Jesus Christ here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temptation Think of it as still science for that of a Model of the Universe, if not any vice versa either. Make it rather the fact that "God created the Universe" and next also a Formal Model for such, because it also could be about Logic. Like "Should not", next also "Should perhaps not" and still that of an Ambiguity, next for that of also Logic. Like brave, also that of a Daredevil as well. if perhaps not any coward itself either. Next. I may perhaps ask whether both stars and galaxies should have been created, only because it also could be a possible purpose. For this, perhaps no good, except for so good either, except for not any long either. Stars are still supposed to be shining in the sky, for that of their possible brilliance, and not for any "stupendity" either. Like a mile long, also a mile short as well, except for still not on target either. You said "E=mc2" and I say "What is next", for what it is perhaps meant to be, except for not saying it so either. This because the Universe apparently came to be, next also for what it is meant to be, and for this, still that of Reason for such a thing. Because of that, no such thing as "pick for that of choose" either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Being Anyway, so in the spotlight for a couple of things, except for not making it any murky details either. Like ice in the fridge, and next the big "sucker" a bit reluctant to bite off, also that of science for that of a fashion as well, in that it next could be that of "Believe". For this, next that of Faith, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal For this, science perhaps science sells as well, except for not making it any measurability versus immeasurability either. Here, perhaps both a salute, if not any tribulation either, and next of course you could believe in a God. Next, perhaps still only words, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle Except for still "Formal Logic" taking precedence, of course, for next that of a Method of Proof. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom What is the point of having a half brother, when it rather could be your brother? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy Spell it perhaps wrong, and it could end up a Conceptual reality, if perhaps not any Spirituality either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-of-body_experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought Psychedelic Keying the word separately, or on its own, apparently no results back on its own, but only when adding a bit more to the query. Getting back at it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courage From Courage here, except for perhaps not any Slavery either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kunta_Kinte https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opportunism "Twinkle, twinkle, little star". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feudalism What if next rather than biting, for next also chewing, also hold your hand as well, for at least that of Believe? For that of sometimes bits and pieces, also churning as well. We know that a pencil could break, or perhaps be broken, when next held in a hand, but also that Heissenberg could make it part versus whole as well, except for not any bits and pieces either. Here perhaps still silly me, except for not any dumb or fool either, for that of making it absolute freeze, or zero, for a couple of things, and next also a bit of hot, if not damp either, for that of the billions of degrees which could be possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porridge Here for that of your toast, except for not any forbidden fruit either, or perhaps even the fact that science still sells. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orchestra Here you need a conductor for the whole thing, except for not any "sing a song" either, for perhaps that of science. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract Fundamental Laws of science, and next Fundamental flaws of science as well, by means of perhaps making it the "Biggest blunder of my life", for such a thing. Perhaps rather "calkwalk" of sorts, and next also a bit of Intelligent Design as well, except for a couple of flaws, of course, but next that the paint became dry, and it also became that of finished work as well. Mentioned before, but the Universe apparently became somewhere, except for nowhere either, for at least what you could see. Like ability, also disability as well, and it next also could become a proportional factor. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity Except for that, perhaps still only scratching the surface, of course, for that of a possible notion. Like I am happy, also you are possibly as well, in that at least both of us could "prove" science. But next that we also could "prove" both Heaven and Hell as well, by means of putting both on a pedestal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measurement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantification_(science) Beware the wolf, always the tools, and next also properties of the Universe as well, except for not making it any science as well, when it next could be science as granted, only because it could be about Proof itself. No secret that we could be standing on two legs, but rather a Fact for such, except for not making it any question either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivative Am I supposed to believe that this could be still science, except for not any trashbin either, which could next be that of both murky and desillusioned as well, for a lack of fact. Keying in "durability" using Google Translate, also sufficient as well. Here pick, for that of a poke, if perhaps not any "Picabou" either, for that of a mountain. cleansing ablution purification purging Or is this perhaps still the old question of who is in charge? Whether it was any Aspects, I do not recall, but if perhaps a thing lying on a bench, perhaps not making it any Saint either. But rather perhaps a Belief, next for that of the Universe itself, in that a couple of questions could be still asked for that of its existence. Here not with me right now, but if perhaps stil that of an alien for such a thing, perhaps not any acid in water either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolution But rather the "Alien Interview" here, and on the spot it becomes that of Dogma here. Pitiful midget of you, except for not any midget either, but why did you perhaps lose sense of it all, and next also that of Comprehension? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegiance But next still swear such a thing, of course. Perhaps this is wrong, because next I "love" Lucy. For that of a tablet, you next also smear, if not swear either, except for still not making it any Heaven and Hell either. We perhaps know what Heaven is, and next also Hell as well, because of only "blatantly" so. Make it a depiction of Heaven, only because of Jesus Christ, and next also the simillar of Hell, only because of the Devil himself. For this, or perhaps both, still by means of our perspective only, and not in any reference or similarity with anything else. Have the breakfast for some two or more, and next also the tablecloth as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orgasm Yes, make it still that of a couple of sins, of course, except for not any intelligent signal which could materialize either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning Here it better should be straight on, in my opinion. Make it rather a haystack, next also hayfever as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allergic_rhinitis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythm You perhaps agree that science sometimes does not sell either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Lord_Fauntleroy Or perhaps rather pizza, for that of making it Pizza Grandiosa. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack Never say never, or perhaps "When Harry met Sally". What happens if you reach for the spoon, and next make it the fork, or perhaps knife instead? Is it perhaps the expression "I do not like your face", except for not any "Shut your mouth" either? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelumbo_nucifera Here keying in Lotus Blossom above. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flower https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint So, except for perhaps a bit sad, what is the difference of standing below an umbrella, except for not making it any parachute either. Wish for good fortune https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selters https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romance See, no such thing as any Ambiguity above either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetry From Poem above. Given Methodology, next also science as well, and it next also translates into God. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infallibility Show me the way. and next among stars, if not making it any stars and stripes either. But next look up in the sky yourself, and for this whatsoever either, if perhaps not so. Here, same as above, namly Infallability. Yes, dinner served. if not any speech either, for that of possible Syllables. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllable Again, pick me, except for not any prick me either, because I could be left choosing a couple of consonants, when it rather should be algebra. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra Toast, next for that of God standing in front of me, and next I could be a believer. Eternal young, and next the melody for this, and not Eternity itself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbxZargtXug Does "vicious" next translate, or make it into any viscocity? Or next perhaps only on behalf of, because it next should be only the Method of Proof? Down the drain, of course. But if next perhaps not any "tell me" either, next perhaps such a thing for that of science, in that it next could be that of a wish to know. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abhorrence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dialectic As I said before, or earlier on, paint a picture of the sky, if not any Heavens, and next also draw a couple of conclusions as well, except for not thinking that it should be a whole, but rather only a part. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Apocalypse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jedi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart Hah, smart. What is an open hand supposed to mean, except for not any picking or filling up either? Beware the wolf, but perhaps not any stacking either, but perhaps rather about a Comprehension, which could be telling about a possible idiot for that of a genius, except for its possible meaning either. ID: 1927004 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1927130 - Posted: 29 Mar 2018, 18:31:01 UTC Happy Easter! Except for that, also a Notepad problem. With my language, not "File" at the top, but only "Fil". It next becomes squeezed in together with the "Edit" button, or "Rediger", to the right. Apparently possible to pull the menu down using the mouse right now, but still that top left problem left to solve. ID: 1927130 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1927213 - Posted: 30 Mar 2018, 1:27:36 UTC Last modified: 30 Mar 2018, 1:47:11 UTC Slap my finger for that of once making it out of order, but except for two restarts before continuing, also losing the good one I had. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calendar Making the link here for I think the third time today. Like "fat boy", also "slim heart" as well, if not the opposite, and also that you could be wearing a red hot face as well. My symphaties for at least Phud Redux here, except for only the opposite with myself, for that of a stuck hand and also churned left foot. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rime https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythm Sometimes perhaps both, if not a comma that could be sometimes missing. The man behind the desk in the shop made a note of me being late again, for that of handing the two packs of beer first, before its closing time. Next the sun still quite high in the sky when leaving the shop, so also a reminder that it once again became summer time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder Lost here during the day as well, if not still lying in the buffer, because a gaussian score should be having a set or preset key for that of a possible transmission, if not any numbers themselves, which could be part of the transmission. Here that of also translating a 10-digit gaussian score or the like into meaningful contents, except for still only notes or lyrics coming from Beethoven either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyrics Here I want the name of a person for this, perhaps wearing glasses like myself, except for not any "Once upon a time" either. Drop a bomb, and next also "bombastic" as well, except for not any shelter either. Kick the sparrow, if perhaps not yourself either, and you also know where it started for this project as well, in that both a guess as well as an assumption should next lead to a possible result. This for also that of validity versus credibility, of course. Make it rather "In the beginning" for such a thing, and next you also know where it started, and this time for real. Make it rather the Universe, and next also space for such a thing, and it all supposedly became all and everything, only for that of an instant moment of time. Here both the W and Z particle, next also bosons as well, and for this also the Strong Nuclear Force, together with the Weak Nuclear Force and also Electromagnetism, making it all a glue, for that of sticking together into a single Theory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W_and_Z_bosons For this, also the "Three First Minutes" as well, in that it could still be about Creation. You next say "Pretty good", for next also "Pretty darn Good", except for the fact that Monotheism could still be part of a given Belief for such, and next perhaps also Thought as well. Making it "The oath of faithfulness", next translates into Allegiance here. For this also good, better, best, in that a marriage could sometimes split up, if not any fuse together either, for next also becoming two visible objects in the sky, where it also could be only one. Making it levels of Energy, next also the Kardashev scale for this, but if rather levels of Intelligence instead, you could be https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient Of course it fell out here right now, but could make it that of Credible evidence instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fata_Morgana_(mirage) Next for rather what you perhaps saw, or was able to see in the sky. Here that of sweet music as well, except for not the Swedish language either, for that of "Dunderklumpen". Perhaps someone could help me out here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style Next a bit of hair for that of a wheelchair, and supposedly one could be "Nobody's Fool", for next also a bit of thinking as well. "Timber, timber", and next also that of a possible transmission as well, next for that of a signal, except for not anything which at least could be telling about Intelligence itself. "For Christ's sake" is perhaps not about any forgiving, or even forbidding either, next for also bidding as well, in that it could be "What is your bidding, my Master". Becomes a sense of that of inconclusiveness of a task, when it rather could be about inconclusivity for that of given knowledge itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maturity Maturity could next also be making the difference between the young and the old, and next no secret that both irregular and elliptic galaxies could be present for such a thing. Next that of science for both the crook and also left handed, in that we still could be making it such a thing, when it perhaps is not about Religion either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision-making https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_tracking https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Double-Track_Decision https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9tente But next also "swear" in front of God as well, in the hope that it perhaps helps. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synagogue Make peace, and next not any war, because next only about Politics. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Tour_program https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempus_fugit If perhaps making it "fuight" above, of course wrong, and should be corrected. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bliss Next, any Religion here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrifice Here that of both numbers for that of also Numerals as well, except for not any given Society, which could be telling about people working, and next also given habits as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numeral https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numeral_system https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beehive https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beehive_Cluster Or perhaps rather a couple of Laws and Equations instead, for that of only an interpretation of nature, as it could be readily accepted, or perhaps acknowledged, by means of modern science. For this, also that of a possible "recognition" as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamics Is Dynamics supposed to be any "flawed", like a couple of other sciences? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle Next tell me the "Truth", for that of also a "split second". The elephant never forgets, but if applying for a job, you sometimes could be missed out, or skipped, for that of another, filling the vacant position. Einstein could perhaps make it E=mc2, for next that of an "absolute" principle, if perhaps not any Method either, for also that of "absoluteness", where it also should be "absolutely". Or perhaps still rather about a Proof, for that above. For this, also that of "Dreamland", of course, if not any sweet dreams either, next for that of also words for its own meaning, which next perhaps could be explaining the Universe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence Losing that above, it all goes down the drain, except for perhaps not any Religion either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conscience Next perhaps agree that this could be a bit wrong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_16 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_wing Either still Perception, except for perhaps nothing going wrong either, but next also the "Man in the Moon" as well, if perhaps not on the surface either, and next "Eyes only" for perhaps a couple of things being watched, or perhaps noticed. You do not need an "excuse" in order to make it any gods or angels, for that of any technology either, for next also making it possible Saints. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallucination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysergic_acid_diethylamide Here also the word "Psychedelic" as well, which I happened to come across a couple of days ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelic_drug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monastery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interaction And here missing out again, for that of keying in something. Seek different answers, next also different alternatives, or options. "Aspect", perhaps, or if not, another word starting with the same letter. Yes, all roads still leading to Rome, perhaps, except for "Let all the small come to me", and next meaning children. Next still also that of the Bible in one hand, and next also science in the other, for that of a shortcut versus each separate one. A famous Equation could perhaps be a "Proof", like also that of infinity itself, but next that Symbolism could also mean a symbolic gesture, if not any "symbiotic variable" for that of a couple of stars either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbiotic_binary Make it rather a Method, and next also a Proof as well, for that of a similar fact. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure Here only that for Plausibility, and perhaps mentioned before. Because I said "In the beginning" in the previous, and next also the beginnng of both space and time, next for that of the Universe itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crosstalk Next speak to the dog as well, except for not any handshake with oneself either, for next also God meeting himself in the door. Bugger, 100 or 200 billion stars in the Milky Way alone, and next also 500 billion galaxies in the Universe as well, and for this also "Feeling good" as well, except for knowing that this is "absolutely" not true. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-down_and_bottom-up_design Any such thing perhaps, for that of the Universe? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_(mathematics) Next, see you around, perhaps for that of a handshake, and also in the middle as well. Like versus dislike, and you could have Python, for that of a programming language, except for not any snake itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missing_Link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_and_concrete Ever heard about Lucy, for that of the Missing Link? It comes to me that like also Noah's Ark as well, for that of our purposes, we need to make it perhaps a different science here, and next also thinking in such a way as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assertion Next a bit of laughter, because it still could be about the Method of Proof. Or perhaps rather a bit of "Funny feeling". Extrapolate Did I make it this word a little while ago, or perhaps a short while ago? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Vivaldi Next some four seasons of the year, and also five senses of the mind. "Beauty and the Beast", and next also a "beastly" attitude, for also a given mentality. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic_process A bit of problems here getting at this. But next also a (given) measure for that of "Nobody's Fool" for that of making it a fool by itself, except for perhaps not any genius either. We know that technology could perhaps be about innovativity, and next also design as well, by next making it Intelligent Design. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-aided_technologies Why not such a thing as CAD/CAM instead, for that of production methods? Like a spear, also an arrow, and for this also "Stairways to Heaven" as well. Fruitful could next also mean fruitless as well, in that it next could be in vain for such a thing, and here Apollo 13, as an example. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Leap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_electron_transition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm_shift Either that of Atomic electron transition above, or perhaps something else being mentioned as well. Should it be a difference between Mona Lisa and the Eiffel Tower, for next also "state of the art"? Yes, yes, yes, still both Nobelium and also Mendelevium for that of a couple of artificial elements, except for still "Nobody's Fool", for that of the "Man in the Street". The logo of the national oil company here, next translates into a droplet of sorts, which next could be Mercury, but rather should be Quicksilver. Both Tenzing and Mallory made it to the finishing point by climbing the Earth, but perhaps not for that of reaching the stars either. Make it rather "Allmighty", and next also "Allmighty God" as well, in that "perceived" next could make for Perception as well, in order to next reach for the stars. But like the push of the button, also that of a couple of things which could be coming your way and next also sometimes pushed as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education Tell me the Truth, next for that of the opposite, which next should mean nonsense. Make it rather "meaning" for that of "meaningless", and next also Comprehension as well, in that I could also make it that of a Creator in such a way as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom Again, that postulate next becomes Axiom once again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commandment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Commandments First bidding, namely that you shall have no other gods than Me. Here at least one only, for that of the other, or perhaps rest, which next also could be that of infinity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equality_(mathematics) Or perhaps rather opposite Forces here, because here also back at Paradigm shift. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm_shift https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation Or perhaps rather faces for that of facets, next for that of nature, like that of a "spooky event". Make it rather ghosts, and it next perhaps deserves nothing either, at least for that of science. Here again that of validity, and also credibility as well, mentioned before, making it also Scientific validity. Work hard, and next also the night shift as well, if not any "scrupelously" either. But next rather levels of intelligence, because it also could be about levels of conscience, except for not still making it any Religion either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creator https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creator_deity Oh yes, tabloid journalism, of course, for that of tabloid newspapers as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea Next also the spoken word for that of the Tabernacle as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabernacle Here the Pope also sometimes enters the Sacristy as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reincarnation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obedience Next also "swear" as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promise https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2xXu8_2Exo "Ascribe" here. What is the interviewer saying around 1:51 in the clip, because not being translated here, for that of text. "Nature is the objective reality". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct_(philosophy) Instance, and not Instantiation here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instantiation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_instantiation Next, "speaking of", and next for that of God, becoming perhaps a template of sorts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template For this, also "Which which", next for that of a witch as well, in that it also could be a science next to believe in. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Out-of-body_experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract Compare next with that of the Aura, which could be part of the body, but next also almost invisible. Here you could perhaps define different levels of intelligence, and also different levels of conscience as well, except for not any "aspire" or "ascribe" either, next for that of a possible "Stairways to Heaven". Bullsh?t? Why always a bucket of flowers, except for not a single flower itself? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic Next, diamonds are forever, of course, except for not any "state of the art" either. Or perhaps rather "When atheists are laughing at Religion", or something like that. Randomness should be about possible choice, for next also picking up so. But next also God in front of you as well, for that of eyes which perhaps could see, except for still not any levels, for at least that of Conscience. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred Do not forget that Sacred next also could mean hatred as well, except for perhaps not love, but next rather that of "meaning", next for that of Conscience, and next also different levels as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filibuster The UFO phenomenon is still an unexplained phenomenon, but could it be telling about a perhaps better world? Is both hatred, as well as also love, only different steps on the ladder, for that of different thresholds as well, and next also that of "measurability"? Somewhere along the road, I also came to make it something else than ladder as well, but except for both levels and thresholds, do not have it here. Next, of course define hatred, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity Next also a bit of "spoken words" for also that of the Ten Commandments. Is it possible to carry a dead human in your hands, and next also make it a drop down in front of your feet? Which words are God supposed for that of picking a couple of words, except for not the Ten Commandments, or even that of "ascribe" itself? We know that a competition could be about possible facts, but next also about "Truth" as well. Conscience should next be able to explain the Universe, as well as also Intelligence is supposed to be doing. You perhaps could make it a dead end of sorts, by making it Uncertainty, when it rather could be about Abstracts, for that of Conscience. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devils_Tower https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil But next also the "opposite" way, for that of possible Conscience, and also different levels for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm_shift Crazy supposedly next also means mad, except for not any MAD itself. Slap your hand, next for that of two cheeks, and you could be slapped on each, in their respective order. "Biggest blunder of my life". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfectionism Same as before, next for that of the Universe not any perfect either, but rather somewhere in between. Trait Anyway, so still a speechless God, for next that of Creation. For this, perhaps also Creation without any meaning, because it also could be about Instantiation. Make it rather the Ten Commandments, and next also Religion for its own sake or purpose, and next also given meaning, Again, Perfectionism next for a perfect world, but rather that it could be both randomness and Chaos, for next also that of disorder. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_number Or perhaps still "Which wich", for next which witch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity Keying in "Relativistic" here. Ad hoc, and next summa summarum, except for not any resume. Figaro... Make it rather Gods hands, for next also a bit of thinking as well, except for not "What did you say". Notion next also translates into both term and concept. Spread your wings and fly away, but is it not the fact that perhaps God made it a couple of words, and next made it for us to next decide, or perhaps choose? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meaning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistics Except for still only a couple of spoken words of course. Read above, and perhaps a given notion of God is perhaps not only about Religion, but in fact could be about spoken words, and also adjectives. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective Ever tried frying a steak using a cooker? Why such a fact that droplets of fat could end up on top of the water, and next the surface? Mundane next translates into "boring", except for not any murene either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moray_eel Next a bit of old stuff, but rather could be making it an "unexplained phenomenon". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelic "Alan's psychedelic breakfast" (Pink Floyd) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tactic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complication Open book science https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Genesis Next also a bit of science, or perhaps Religion, in front of your feet, for next also overstepping, if perhaps not believing in the whole thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_Ages_(historiography) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQ30CWfOfKA Speaking of, and next also Demography as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demography https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopus Before that, Canopus, and next also meaning of. So long, and next also a bit of long as well, except for still both meaning and Reason. Pick up a word, and next also title as well, for also making it "Ascribe". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plant Next, also making it "Children of Earth" as well. "Tell" about God for its possible meaning, and next also Ascribe as well. This because levels of intelligence is not supposed to be telling about any infinity either. "You missed the fact", next for making infinity only a notion, when it perhaps is not about God himself. "Glory be", and next perhaps also the song as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honesty https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremophile Weakness of a given Theory But still only a couple of words, except for not God telling about himself. What is next the difference between both beer and potato chips, and next that of a dream? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dream You perhaps could make it an apology of sorts, and next also a digress. Here that of a "final answer" for a couple of things, and next also a famous equation as well, except for still not a GUT. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory Next perhaps two different "Theories", for also making it Monotheism, sometimes. Make it rather Religion, and next also a "prevailing" Theory for such a thing. "Divide and Conquer", for that of split and rule, and next what did you say? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trapdoor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallibilism Why not that of Fallibilty, or Infallibility, for such a thing, because next also speaking of God. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infallibility https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Failure Here also that of Perfect, for that of Perfectness, and also measure, for that of immeasurability, but next also meaning, for that of also meaningless. Spoken word... and next back to that of God. I mentioned the 100 meter for that of running, and next also falling already at the start. My guess is that it always could be a different "Proof", next for that of a given matter, except for not any subject itself. Sit on a chair, and next not any reason of climbing such a chair either, for that of a different level or ladder of knowledge, or perhaps Conscience. For this, also that of the grave, for also possible Eternity, and next only part of the piece, when it next could also be a puzzle. To be honest. genetic manipulation could be about disproportionality, except for not any "Alien implants" either. But rather thinking here about that of different truths, for next that of "Truth" itself, except for not any Conscience either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirituality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burl_Ives https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFGGDC_7s4w Next also so old I am myself, because listening in, perhaps not what I want here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology Next also techology for that of both purpose and also meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism Or perhaps rather "given the fact", for that of both potato chips and still three some beers left. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdote https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift Here perhaps should be better stated, for that of the more precise, for the latter, because here a bit of red color. But rather making it fact for that of an ambiguity, and next also a possible mismatch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy Yes, next soon almost forgotten, except for not the Pope himself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charity Oh, practise. Spell it differently, and next also incorrectly, because read my lips for that of the Universe also spelt in a similar way, for that of its imperfectness. Make it one thing, and next perhaps not another, but you could still have it both, for that of indulgence, or possibly the Purgatory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence Here I rather made it this next for that of another, or different word, previously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fabel Snort, rather use your teeth, and next also a rope, for next pulling a train. Is an Illusion next a "defamatory" word, for that of the word itself? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation Or perhaps still here only for that of "proving" science only. "One step closer" (lyrics), for that of YouTube. Official statement --> declaration, and next also "Declaration of Principles", for next also something being found. Except for perhaps not telling about ourselves either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsification https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof Next also a "tell tale" story for that of also making it a Fabric of space. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symposium Next also "Written statement", and perhaps also mentioned before. The last thing scientists could be in for, is that of "Belief", because it also could be about reluctance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noun Or perhaps rather "a matter of fact here", next for still that of Belief? Is Belief supposed to be about any Conscience, next for also Conscious meaning? Here stuck for that of a missing word here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjective https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrospect Here stuck as well, for that of the latter. But next. "So sorry to see you go", and next also vanish as well, and also leaving the project. Contientious, next for that of also contientious mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth benevolent volgar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Horsemen_of_the_Apocalypse Why not only the horsemen here, or perhaps the horses themselves? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocalypse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biorhythm Still leads back at a notion of God, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology_of_religion Perhaps a new one here, for at least the first, or perhaps both. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meningitis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flow Next, Airflow, except for not any bucket of flowers either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syndicate Next why such a thing for next that of wording itself. Why make it both Atheists, Agnostics, and also Believers here, when it also, or perhaps rather, should be about a couple of words? Yes, "deemed successful", and next also failure as well, next for also that of Creation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontius_Pilate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treason And next also the Pope is supposed to be a "Pontiff". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontiff You are welcome, of course, except for not making it any millions, or billions of degrees either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin Next, natural factors as well. Why is the "Alien Interview" giving a mentioning of that of nature? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore%27s_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy To a certain degree... or perhaps "Welcome home". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master%27s_degree https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor%27s_degree Disgusting, except for not the hat either. Contravene, and next also circumvene as well, except for not any "top hat" either, for that of never forgetting, and next also the elephant. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanza Here that of a song of sorts, except for not any Lotus Blossom either, and ended up on a different disk. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hymn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrostic Silence!, except for not a silent world either. Next, "translates into", for next making it science, where it perhaps rather could be Religion. In the hands of God, you next perhaps could say, and also for that of Religion itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obedience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule "On your feet", or perhaps "Give me a laugh" instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjecture https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nomenclature And next also the "Bible" as well, for also making it a couple of words. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merriam-Webster https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syntax Next, also "Row your boat" as well. Look back, and next the opposite of any look ahead, for that of possible fact, or fortune finding. Still, Creation itself, for that of both words and syntax, if perhaps not any infallibles either, because it next could mean God. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraphrase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_science Keying in "divulge", and apparently not Google Translate keeping in touch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melody https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_Touch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockabilly Translates into... Given purpose, next also mind, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_global_warming https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temper https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_of_the_Night https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swamp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swamp_Thing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_esotericism Keying in Esotericm only, for that above. "Meticulously crafted", and next what is the difference between a jeweler and a watchmaker, for that of possible craftmanship? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera Summa summarum . . . ID: 1927213 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1927259 - Posted: 30 Mar 2018, 4:48:04 UTC Last modified: 30 Mar 2018, 4:55:40 UTC Eine kleine nactmusic. . . Read below, and next that I lost the name of the poet, as well as also that of also "Creation" itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fidelity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substance Think of it as perhaps a scientific debate for that of meaning, if you will, except for not making it any meaningless either. Down the river... Or perhaps rather "In the footsteps" of someone. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imitation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobotomy Next, treats and traits as usual. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack_trace For this also the Heap and the stack. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backtracking Generic, for that of a generic principle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figaro https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fistula Next also a painting by Rembrandt, and also a signature, for that of the final work. Next, read the final print as well, for that of Creation itself, and next what it supposedly "mean", Honour, next your honour as well. Glory, for that of splendor, and next also a bit of magnificence as well. Supposedly nature could still be having the upper hand, and next also the "Alien Interview" for this as well. "Be honored", or "you be the glory", and next also the song for this, as mentioned previously. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanism Next also "push the button" as well, because perhaps not only about Agnosticism here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speculation_(disambiguation) You be the reader here for next that of the rest. Here still that of the cake, of course, except for not making it any Imagination or Illusion either, and next think that you know the rest. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy But here that the "Alien Interview" still makes it only nature for such a thing, except for not any "garbled" either. Who is who, and next the interviewer for that of, or respective, to the given subject. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Specimen https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contrast Except for not still any laughter, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse Malpractise Oh, perhaps Religion "sells" on its own, for only making it a "practise". One tooth, and next also two teeth, except for not many either. Contravene next also means circumvent, as previously mentioned. Given the fact, and next also given, except for not any stated either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice Disciplinary versus indisciplinary Next learn how to spell, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax Here from that of Taxation, and next not "Moment of Truth" either. Quantum Leap and next also "One thing for another". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction "No, no, no, because I did not want it to be so". Forever young, and next also forever lasting. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preference What is the secret here, except for not any reading of lips either. Teach a lesson and next also taught as well, in that Creation could perhaps be in a context of God, and next also a notion as well. Picture next also means a frame, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_and_legal_rights Keying in only statutory here, at first. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hangman Hangman, and next also the rope as well, for that of the executioner. But rather Basic facts, next also basic principle as well, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slant Next, heck, and also heck of. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline "The Union threatened Interdisciplinary action..." But next science perhaps goes wrong, for next also right, and next also alright. Keen versus albeit, or perhaps rather "de facto". Here, syllable, when I rather could make it that of a pronunciation. If not wrong, perhaps that of elementary particles for that of itself, and next perhaps no more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproduction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_science Guess what, but perhaps I could be crooked, for next that of "fringe science". Best option, and next also best alternative, except for not any least for the best either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compromise https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalemate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWLySXyfpv4 Support a Theory... Wheel of fortune, and next also luck as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia Big wheel, and next for that of nature only. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scratchpad https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune Wish me a bit of luck here. What if next perhaps rather nature itself for its own, and next not any "bidding" either, next for my Master? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compass https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navigation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynicism_(philosophy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynicism_(contemporary) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato Next also hah-hah, as well, except for possible spelling, versus misspelling. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiquity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughnut https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shine_On_You_Crazy_Diamond https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Composition Next, Everyone, for that of a Reason, if not any Imagination either, or a possible dream. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought So easy perhaps, and next also giving a thought about that of meaning itself, except for not a Creator as well, and next for also that of the whole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllable Translates into, and next for also that of a meaning as well, except for not making it any Religion either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pok%C3%A9mon Yes, scientifical advancement, or achievement, of course, and next that of both music and lyrics. Next, given that, and next also "next", of course, except not any else, or whatsoever either. Tell me. and next also that of Truth as well, except for not making it any "obedience" either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polaris Sunrise, and next also sunset, and next we also are supposed to "believe", and next also for that of science. His name is perhaps David Letterman, and next also for that of a brief story. Told and next also possibly untold as well, because we still could be left believing in the Method of Proof, for a couple of things. Nope, because next perhaps the words of God as well, for next also the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countenance Ding ding! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_countenance And not the regular ... here either, for that of a couple of Google notifications. Secret heart, and next also gracious as well. Spell, spelt, spelt. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humbug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-experiment Except for perhaps a joke, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fan_(person) Good is good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_and_dependence Here perhaps a nice one. Oh, getting back at this, because next and envelope, and also a stamp. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotation Inner circle (eyes only) Chamberlain, next for that of a court, except for not any interdisciplinary action either. How come, next for that of the world? Like child, next also children as well, and next also "spawning". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_reluctance Here only reluctance on my mind, except for not any "lasting dream" either. For this, also that of the "other way" of sorts, in that perhaps any music is not "provable" by means of science either. Gimme, gimme, and next also a bit of thought as well, except for not making it any science either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_processes_(theory_of_constraints)#Processes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_processes_(theory_of_constraints) Next, keying in only "Prerequisite" here. Dumb, dumber, dumbest, next for also the silliest thing in the world, except for not any natural occurrence either, which next could be part of the world. Oh, perhaps backtracking once again, for next also "Speaking of". Translates into science, for that of possible facts, except for not any given melody either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desire https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_tank Think tank, and next also throw away as well, for that of God is good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsibility Again my excuses here for using the Wikipedia only, but next also Todd for that of a nod, except for not any Todd Hebert either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Commission Next tell the President for that of such a thing, except for not any "preclude" either. A pen is still supposed to be different than a pencil, but next "How come" for such a thing. Dizzy, and next also a bit feeble as well, except for not any "dumb" science either. Or perhaps rather catch your breath, for still making it a single piece, and next also standing aground, or perhaps on your feet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomaly Holy cow, except for not any bloody nose either. Translates into... Harassment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_PBU9a8FQY Double cross, of course, except for not any given mind either (statuory). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape Here for that of only statuory itself. "Shut your mouth", and next also a badge for such, except for not making it any divulge either, when it rather could be about a deluge. In the footsteps... (and next by someone) Is perhaps the reason of believing in a possible Creator, next that of Fact itself, or perhaps rather because of Fiction? Yes, merge for that of merging, next could also mean a possible fuse, if not any such thing as "living forever" either. Silent night... Oh, power of love, and next also "with you" as well. for that of given lyrics. But next, also "slap my hand", next for also "knucklehead" as well. You next leave it that of an Idea next for a Thought, and perhaps next back at the start. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clark_Gable Forgetmenot Next, redirects back, or transates into... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distribution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clark_Gable Next also Wealth. Once upon a time... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice Or perhaps rather Sacrifice? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrifice Why not only "condon off" instead, for that of making it a limit, next for that of Prejudice above. Like spell, spelt, spelt, next also so, at least literally, except for not spilling everything on the floor either. First hand, and next perhaps music for such a thing, like Clark Gable, except for not any Prejudice itself. Upper hand, and next that of a fork for next a knife. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance Next, sit back and watch the show, for that of indifference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gossip Next, prove God as well. You know that I left the show. One thing for that, or against another, and next also "knucklehead" as well. Supposedly the Scientific Method is still about "Proof". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mole Or perhaps rather about a bit of digging here. "Stuff", for next also that of "meant to be", except for not any sinister either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretext https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsification Next, liar as well. except for not any Proof either. Is this perhaps a way of thinking as well, because next also that of "either/or", next for not any Logic either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlatan Possible deceit, perhaps and next also for that of money. First hand, and next also first look. Like a sunrise, also a sunset as well, and next also a Contradiction as well. Leading back to.. Alpha and omega. next for the alphabet, and not for that of Creation, as of such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication Standard model, and next Standard model of Physics as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model But next rather "Creation" itself, and also that of gasp, for that of also grasping. Slop, for that of a bit of hash, and next in a frying pan as well. Renunciation, and next a bit of yourself as well. Divide and Conquer, and next we also fall. "Home sweet home", and next also home for such, except for not any sweet either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procession Why not make it Determinism instead, because it could be about a single grave. Think you may have the answer, and next also the question as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition You said, of course. Question God, and next also God himself, and next not any "Infallability" either. Yes, slip my mouth, except not my tongue either, but also a bit of questioning still in the air, for that of both subject and question alone, and next the possible interviewer, or interrogator. Namely for perhaps almost the same voice here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrospect Or perhaps rather "In reference to, or perhaps with". So good, and next also a bit of lucky as well, except for not any soothsayer, or psychic, next for also a foreteller, which next also could be telling about nature. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction Annual, for that of an anniversary. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dendrochronology#Growth_rings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graining Knock-knock, next also of wood. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllable What if science perhaps was not that any hard either? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffix https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devotion Or perhaps "imflammatory" as well, and next for the book of science, except for still not only the Bible, which could be held in your hand. Next, a closed door for almost everything, except for not any science either, which next also should mean a possible conclusion. Theft next also means stealing, of course. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule Oh, little angel. Sweet dreams. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpZgzaH4q3w Here at the end. ID: 1927259 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1927260 - Posted: 30 Mar 2018, 5:08:07 UTC Last modified: 30 Mar 2018, 5:20:59 UTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpZgzaH4q3w Next also a bit of nonsense for such a thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow Next also spearhead, and for that, also a bit of sincerity as well. But rather Perdition, for that of also Damnation, in that it could be possibly a murky issue. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messiah Oh, farewell, if you next rather will. Nonsense <--> laughter (synomymous to, or against), like also hitherto, except for not any frying pan either. Cookalike and next also "chokealike", or cheekalike as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC Next, WTF for perhaps much of the same. Yeah, of course also disgusting, at least sometimes. Next, stand for, and next also meaning as well, if not any principle either, but what if it rather happened to be the opposite? "Lucky, lucky, lucky", and next feeling proud as well, except for not any stampede either. Back tomorrow. ID: 1927260 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1927267 - Posted: 30 Mar 2018, 5:37:56 UTC Last modified: 30 Mar 2018, 5:42:38 UTC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpZgzaH4q3w Forget my silly comments, but next also catching the eyes here. Slip my tongue for next also a bit of swift as well, but at least noticing that. Guess it could be still science here, except for not any rear, or back in between either, next for also that of behind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll Getting back at it. ID: 1927267 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929750 - Posted: 13 Apr 2018, 7:51:35 UTC Last modified: 13 Apr 2018, 8:32:34 UTC Did it blow, except for not catching my silly eyes either. Nex read blue above, for next also Predictability itself, if perhaps not the opposite either. Yes, thinking here that science could be made by using your left hand, when it rather should be with the right hand. Or perhaps rather be dealt a big blow already at the start, because here also perhaps also still winners versus losers, except for not any game itself, and next also a threadmill as well, for that of stepping on someones toes. You perhaps already know, but let me expand a little for that of perhaps scientifc knowledge, in that I could make attain also that of attainability. science knowledge knowledgability Yes, push the button if you will and next also a quest for knowledge, next for also a bit of nature, if you will. Oh, treasury of sorts, if not any love or treasure home either (Art and Garfunkel). If you don't mind, perhaps no reason to question any science either, for next altogether. Is it not a secret that the train could be waiting at the station, next to go, only because the train driver, or even conductor, could choose to make it gÃ²? Same goes for any science, for next any salute, if not any tribulation either, because next I could be an Emperor of sorts, and also in my own realm as well, or perhaps properties. Yes, both failure, if not any broken or bankruptcy either. http://mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=21963 Trying out the link at first, for next a bit of nonsense. Posting here, because I could also post in Q&A for that of a similar bit of nonsense (or perhaps science). Edit: Doing so, and next clicking back, perhaps a bit slow, because ending up a page before, or previous. Why not speak of, or perhaps mention that of "attainability" next for that of science again. "Nobody's fools" and next perhaps no science either. In a similar way, diligence also translates into diligency. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry) Stiil the silly or stupid user here, or should we rather be discussing nature. Come on, be slaves if you will, except for not any "Congruency" either. Hmm, the old king, and next keying in aristo... (meaning ?), or perhaps no answer given. And not Aristoteles or Socrates either. Mind you that this is perhaps not any skeptical either, but perhaps rather for that of fact finding here. If rather dignity here or above, you perhaps understand or know what I mean. Oh, question the validty for that of science instead, and perhaps not about that either, because here my own thread, and next also subject of own or personal will as well. Should it next be about a salary for such a thing, rather than a possible disputas, or doctorate? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctorate https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis Oh, my bad for not getting at it (next fart). Turn the key, if not any fart, or farting either, and next for that of a scientist, and perhaps his or her opinon, when it comes to, or in regards to a particular subject, and next still fart. Your opinion, please, when it comes to, and regarding this or that particular subject, and also in a particular slur or fashion as well. Why such a thing for that of the usual, including a couple of "users", except for no science itself? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mumps First thought here that I could be ending up with the Walrus. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walrus Except for not any Coconut either, or even a kick in the butt. You sold, and I next bought, if not any vice versa, for that of any science. Make it any leftover, and next also given skills, if you will, next for perhaps your pleasure, if not any knowledge either. Knock-knock. You perhaps know the little secret here, and give me some time. How come when it comes to that of user relationship, versus possible science? Is stupidity perhaps about a given user experience, or perspective, because next also "Nobody's fool"? Or is it perhaps rather that science itself should be coming up with the answer. next also because it could be having or offering the possible solutions? Think of a painting if you will, and next also an abstract one. Next, an answer here, except for any questions, and here perhaps back at Logic. Posting here ... ID: 1929750 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929752 - Posted: 13 Apr 2018, 9:03:00 UTC Last modified: 13 Apr 2018, 9:16:06 UTC Here logging in using my secondary account at first, and next what about any privacy? As usual, main conclusion at the end of the posting, except for not any "naught" either, for perhaps any drought. Or perhaps rather Predictability itself, for next an answer in advance. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic And perhaps not any "Nobody's fool" eitheer, for next that of a bow. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swordfish Here perhaps a bit ugly, and next also cathing such a fish in the Meditteranean. Why not make it the spoken versus unspoken word either, for next that of Illiteracy, and next think that God could be having the similar opinon, or perhaps meaning? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autism Dangit, but reallty does not mean or help here. Guss who is right, or perhaps wrong here, except for not making science speak for itself. Here it could be close around for my 15'th year anniversary here, except for not spelling it, of course. Yes, picking up, and next also a difference as well, if not making it any prime numbers either. We all know that science is having its pitfalls, among others that of moderation, if perhaps not any science itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method Think of it as sometimes in the blue, and next it also becomes vanished or gone as well, thanks to the Scientific Method. Oh, or perhaps even a big blunder of sorts as well, but need to get back at that. Getting the last beers in the fridge. but apparently not the end of the day for that of any shopping. ID: 1929752 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929762 - Posted: 13 Apr 2018, 10:05:29 UTC Last modified: 13 Apr 2018, 10:19:15 UTC Oh, you perhaps already heard. Namely the fact that the Pope perhaps could not be making any sense of the Devil itself, including possible Hell. Hnn, oh yes, except for not any Braveheart either. What if I chose to take the bus here, and next perhaps agree? You know, making it a sense of Heaven and Hell is perhaps not the same as science itself. and next you perhaps know. Celibacy, by means of Google Translate here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abolition Or perhaps rather Abolishment here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_by_natural_causes Same goes here, for that of reporting of tasks, except for not any kickme either. See you around, except for not any Captcha or recaptcha either, because why if Logic happened to be a stupid thing itself. and next also telling about possible science, while the subject of Religion is perhaps not up at hand, and next dealing with the subject? In the hands of God, eh, and next perhaps still the subject of Religion for this, except for not making it any science either. Cocoon, except for not any pardon me for that of a bluff, when it rather could be about science instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrogation Here the room for the Skeptics, of course. Why not make it a "tell-tale" instead, and next also a story for the same, in that it also could make or fit a given purpose? Naming scheme (for a given purpose) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sentence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragraph Past midnight, and next also past tea. What if I rather questioned the Dead Sea scolls here, and next also made it a big fantasy? If you do not mind, Einstein could still make it "The biggest blunder of sorts" and next also for that of science. Two feet for next that of standing, and next also a trap as well, past or below your feet. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction The interesting here is that this could perhaps be about a Method itself, and not any stupid fool or idiot, questioning such a thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationality Or perhaps the opposite here, which I have not checked out yet, but could end up in "Nobody's fool", except for not any splendor either. Yes, the little "bi-" for next that of bi-sexual and the like and the fact that science also sells. Making it "bi-" here, and next you also are a homosexual as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackbuck Hmmm. (Perhaps) A questuion here about where or in which way science perhaps value itself, except for not questioning either. Tout? Needs checking, but popping up here. like an idea book itself. Plausibilty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tout Perhaps not what I want here, smack. Here I said stick it, for next to the ground, and also the other word as well. Let us agree that it is perhaps not your day, like not your mine either, for that of perhaps selling a story. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burqa Am I still supposed to question any "scientific validity" here? Next, throw me off again, or as usual, except for perhaps not feeling any proud either. Or perhaps rather fancy instead, in that it could be about the Scientific Method, and next also about science. "Say you, say me, perhaps about stupidity", except for not making it any science eithe. Yes, you perhaps know, except for not any "kickass" either. ID: 1929762 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929876 - Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 5:25:55 UTC Last modified: 14 Apr 2018, 5:27:20 UTC Did the whole buffer go away right now, only because of Internet Explorer rather than Google Chrome? Having the dinner first, but if so, a bit of shame. :( ID: 1929876 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929898 - Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 10:47:07 UTC Same again for that of a broken keyboard right now, and when pressing wrong and rewinding back or forth in the same tab, next returning back, only to find contents gone. Will try replacing with one from the living room, but also no point at continuing right now, because Windows 10 is perhaps too heavy for that of broken disks. Better have a short break, and also a bit of headache as well, but could make it some four more tasks running first. ID: 1929898 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929931 - Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 16:10:01 UTC Last modified: 14 Apr 2018, 16:11:20 UTC Right click, left click, Home, End and next down to the bottom of the page itself for that of recent postings. Same thing happened again, and only one beer left in the fridge, when using the electronic keyboard with a click of a mouse. ID: 1929931 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929945 - Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:15:39 UTC Last modified: 14 Apr 2018, 18:54:12 UTC I think I found a solution right now, by first installing the wrong software, and next also that the very small infrared Logitech USB connector, is only for the mouse, and that the keyboard becomes a different one. Found it as well in the living room, but also one of those things that did not catch my eyes, because the Wireless Optical Desktop Receiver 3.0 do not work under Windows 10 and probably is for Windows XP, because here using the installed version of Microsoft Intellipoint and IntelliType Pro on another disk. The CD-ROM lies in a box below my bed, but this will not help, because here it became overstrike mode, and needed the electronic keypad here. Two sets of different USB ports at the front, each in pairs, and one perhaps for 2.0, while the other could be 3.0, but here not sure, except that it still needs two connection attempts at times. It really should benefit from a diod or lamp showing CAPS LOCK and the like, and also the ON/OFF switch on the bottom side is flimsy with the Logitech keyboard, and here such a main switch needs to be sturdy, despite only small batteries. I got used with the Microsoft keyboard here, and perhaps slightly better, except for not Microsoft the best on all hardware. Still out at the right for the Enter key, because for now the single words gets down on two or more lines at times, including also large caps as well. But rather making a point at PrimeGrid of the possibilities when using the graphics cards for that of the AP27 search, and next also Optimal mode in the BIOS settings, because if not mentioned here, it became noticed that this perhaps was not only a hardware issue, but also could be a software one as well. It should also be known that even CUDA is not always that smooth when it comes to the running of Seti@home, because of the raw data involved, and also that Autocorrection added much to the strain, or perhaps difficulty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocorrection One thing being noticed is that I need to look around for that of making a new tab using Internet Explorer 11, particularly when only a single one, because here to close and also too small. next to the running tab. Becomes a reminder that a tool is for possible help and remedy, but perhaps not the same as any miracle either. If choosing between CPU tasks and also both CPU tasks and CUDA tasks, and next by means of the server, and next suspending the Project itself, in the Projects tab of the Manager, does this affect any downloading of new tasks if I also suspend or continue each task in the task tab? I know that a download could be taking some time, but here also the message of requesting new tasks as well, which does not show up here, and here not wanting to press the Update button either. Because here getting back at both Autocorrection, and also the diod for the lamp, in that it could be spelt incorrectly, but not always so either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autocorrelation Read above, and next ding-ding for a couple of things, including the double url at times, taking away a couple of seconds. Here from the second tab next to the right, and here right-clicking with the mouse in the address bar, for that of copy and paste, and rather getting the stitch or note for that of the menuline and statusline being visible in the browser. Not any cheek either, but perhaps rather for that of a preselect here, for that of an option. Here either still the borking mouse, or it could rather be a software error, and here really do not know. If the File, Edit and Help menu is visible in the browser, right click there with the mouse for this. Leaving it there, I think, because perhaps slightly difficult making fun with someone with only one beer left. ID: 1929945 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1929952 - Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 18:50:55 UTC Last modified: 14 Apr 2018, 19:24:01 UTC It loses the posting buffer each time when pressing the wrong key, and here twice in a row, despite having the tab back in the browser. Also it could be showing up as well. ID: 1929952 · Reply Quote

bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 7018 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 3	Message 1930002 - Posted: 14 Apr 2018, 22:42:25 UTC Last modified: 14 Apr 2018, 23:07:53 UTC One beer left to go, and I will have it right now, because the headache was gone when returning back to the session. Still a bit of slow start, but ended up with a punctum, for that of a comma in the previous. Or punctuation mark, perhaps, because the installation program is unable to find the graphics driver and next continue the installation. But next also mission accomplished, for that of looking backwards in time, including where it all started, at least for this project, next with a push of a button. So, what it meant with a scientific objective, rather than a result, in that it blew for both 0, and also negative numbers in the previous. I was looking up Residue in the Wikipedia, for that of results, and their individual relationship for that of a comparison (validation), but rather was thinking of nature here, for that of its choice of selections. Here "Survival of the fittest", as one such example, next by means of Charles Darwin, except for perhaps not Lucy either, as our common ancestor. A gaussian score will never beat a pulse score, for obvious reasons, but next for the same reason, no such thing as a infinite score either, when it comes to that of numbers. Make it rather a painting, and next also a painter as well, and because of that we also could make it Creation versus a Creator, except for also attending church for the same thing. Make it rather E.T. for that of possible extraterrestrials, and next no such things as heathen or pagan, for the possible divine, when it rather could be about the supernatural. If rather a scale for a couple of things, you could also have the Kardashev scale, and next also different levels as well, for both that of intelligence and conscience. If I left a couple of habits, and ended up an Agnostic instead, why such a thing as wheels inside wheels, when it also could be the words of Ezekiel here, for such a thing. But if rather open ended instead, where are the limits for that of possible numbers, when it also could be about infinity? Do we not already know that true versus false should be the best explanation for the "Man in the Street" versus the genius, and next for that of Logic? Compare with "Does God exist" versus "Does God not exist", and next compare with the Einstein field equations, or perhaps rather x, y, and z, for that of the unknown variables making up a particular Equation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_field_equations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynomial Here also a reason why a mathematician is not supposed to be attending church. If perhaps rather five fingers on each hand, and next also five toes on each foot, what does it tell about my personality, when it rather could be the heart or brain? Is God having five fingers as well, or does he skip a heartbeat for next also having a deep breath? "In the beginning..." In the beginning, God created both the Earth and the Universe, and next also saw that it was working. Yes, created, and next by means of his hands, if perhaps not his brain either. So, for now I walk inside a high rise building, and want to take the elevator to the fifth floor, with the entrance at first floor. Next skipping the third floor, because it became the wrong button, or perhaps even type, for next different levels of intelligence. Yes. you are allowed to be having your opinions, and next also ways of belief, but if we could be unable to make it that of the possible divine for that of science itself, except for such a personal opinion or view, perhaps a bit wrong. In which way are you able to define such a thing as randomness and chaos from a mathematical point or perspective, when it also could be about fractals, if not any irrational numbers either? Is the difference between that of a "perfect world" and total chaos only that of patterns or sets, or should we also consider such a thing a Coincidences or the like? Here also a bit of Symmetry as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry Here again "foot" for that of an elephant and next also the spoken word for that of a command, and it ended up somewhere else. Look at the Universe using your own eyes, and next "reveal yourself" as well, for all that of splendor and glory which could be visible. Anyway, so the Pope right now abolished, or perhaps went away from that of "Hell" as a notion, and rather could still be thinking of a perfect world. Make it Creation if you will, and next two parts each, but if also that of a Myth as well, also still that of Heaven and Hell, and again two different parts. Have the Pope make a visit to another country, next by means of a plane, for this roll out the carpet for that of feet standing on, except for trampling in the middle either, for that of overstepping, or even two separate carpets. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism But next rather Fundamental Laws of nature for such a thing, and perhaps also a difference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction Next that a priest is not supposed to be a scientist either, for that of coming up with a GUT (Grand Unified Theory) for everything. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_law https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_science Perhaps not the best here, for that of the first one, because I already noticed "Theory of everything" here, and it becomes that of wearing two sets of glasses, next for still only glasses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything We know that making it rather intelligent civilizations throughout the Universe could be based on both flawed methods, as well as thinking, but next that a perfect world should not be telling more about a couple of details than the complete opposite. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oQtgXeYQuHM Here a bit of nice music listening at, when composing up your message for that of posting. Like Perdition, also Damnation, and for this also a small girl wearing black hair, and also greasy lips as well, because of events happening. Oh, God, why did you leave me, when next hanging on the cross? Is it because it perhaps ended up going the wrong way first? Why such a thing as mercy and lovingkindness being around, when we also could know about hatred as well? Should God next be one thing or another, for perhaps both or all, or should we rather leave him alone, for perhaps something else? Or is it perhaps because there should be a difference for that of Matter Creation itself, and next the Forces which could be making such a thing possible? Here pressed the wrong button again, for at least posting. Edit: Launching four more tasks on my secondary account, and it makes for a triplet of 13.12 at slightly past 0.3 % complete. Here WU 10dc17ab.3376.209198.5.32.212.vlar Back later. ID: 1930002 · Reply Quote

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.