Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 · 110 · 111 . . . 141 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1920636 - Posted: 23 Feb 2018, 14:03:11 UTC
Last modified: 23 Feb 2018, 14:13:55 UTC

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=82629

Needs checking for the link, but I am not forgetting the whole thing either, because it becomes both a money issue, and also that of a similar priority,
except for not any affinity either.

For those parts still lying around, or ending up broken, there were also a pair of GTX1080 cards.

Theoretically I could just replace the cards being used for that of possible result output, at least for that of CUDA, but here that of both undervolt and heat.

But next that these cards makes no difference from that of PC/Workstation or server architecture, which is not really the main point, but rather that it should be
still PCI Express16, or the like for that of the slot.

Also keying in "SoG" using a tab in the browser, but ending up on page 6 with no result back from the query.

Here possibly one such task I came across on the server which ran out in error, or became incomplete, because of what I could think is still a development process.

Here that of the software for this, meaning the application, and I should leave it here, since it is not my favorite subject.

But rather that of some people more or less living like the Australian bushmen, for that of also making an axe, or sharp knife from that of a stone, next for that of hunting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecus

Because except for sometimes in one ear, and next out the other, at least we could be having Jodie Foster listening at times, except for also making it those five senses,
next for still that of both listening, and also possible eavesdropping.

For this it could be still "Man of our times", in that a scientific consensus is not necessarily always the same as a scientific debate either.

Still both the food in the kitchen, if not in front of me on the table, except for also thinking that we could be "Children of God" for what it could be supposed to meant to be.

Here possibly still a bit of entertainment meant for the masses, but should it next be a difference by making it just only 2, for that of 2 * 100,000, or 2 * 100,000,000,000 ?

Here comparatively speaking, except for perhaps not any adding either, except for that it could be about a given property of space, which we next could be part of.

If still that of in one ear, and next out the other, where next that of science versus a possible consensus for what we possibly could try, or maybe achieve?

Should it still be about a possible story being told, or should it rather be the intelligent signal which never could show up, or be part of the world of knowledge?

If I could be left to believe that Intelligence on its own next should also mean Probability, next that I could be wrong, because I could still make it Hypnosis a natural phenomenon,
if not rather the fact that we could be still only 0.84 on the Kardashev scale.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnosis

So perhaps the strange thing again, namely that of having an uncle who next could also be a priest of profession, and for this on my fathers side.

He has passed away, like also my father, but here also recall from a couple of visits, that not only the prayer at the start of a meal, but also when finished up as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalism

Make it still both the axe or knife for that of possible hunting, except for not any bushman either, but next ignite the fire for that of such a meal, and you next could end up
singing a song, if perhaps not any thinking or dreaming, for that of looking up in the night sky before it gets too late.

We still could be having the phrase "Let all the small children", come to me, and next by the words of Jesus.

If still a difference between a psalm and a verse, also that it could be travel to the Christmas star for that of a possible movie, if not such a thing as a "Dogma" either.

What should be the most important here?

Should it be still a notion about a heaven, or perhaps celestial sky filled with stars, or is it rather the fact that nature could be explained by using such tools as Physics and Mathematics,
and next for the Force of gravity?

If still dry science at times, next that things could be counted up as usual, by means of quantifying, except for not making it any red, blue, or green for that of any colors either.

Similarly, it could still be the notion of possible "Little Green Men", among a couple of people, except for not making it any gods or angels either, for that of a different view.

Here still the thought that making it any unexplained, should next also make it that of "Mystery, magic, or miracles", if not any superstition either, except for perhaps the mirror,
which at least could be explained.

But rather that we could choose to make it a discussion for that of possible science, when it rather could also be that of Religion as a possible excuse, when we perhaps do not know better.

Make it still a discussion about the WOW signal, and it could perhaps be not any consensus either, but rather a discussion which could end up being the wrong one.

It could still be about SoG for that of a possible driver issue, except for such a thing as science sometimes on a loose wire, without no place to go.

Perhaps God still created the Universe, but next that we could still be looking for a Dyson sphere in space, in order to make it other intelligent civilizations which could be present.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Genesis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrase

Here two different things, or perhaps subjects, but you may know or be familiar with the ":" for that of possible verses.

Still perhaps a discussion about science, if not any consensus either, but next also the fact that you could not make it any better by choosing any psalms or verses,
for that of any Religion either.

Should a "Dogma" still be from the mouth of a possible extraterrestrial, only because it could be telling about space itself, if not any Existence, or even "Reason"?

We could still be "Children of Earth" in one sense, in that we could be still only physical, and also limited by the Force of gravity for that of making it any space flight.

A possible Consensus could still be an even match between some three results, only because it became a positive result, and also a similar agreement of the outcome.

Always the nice or interesting things you could catch when reading around, and this time it became a couple of galaxies being mentioned.

A galaxy is next supposed to be hiding or disappearing either, but our senses could also be telling that there could be things hiding in the shadows,
when nothing is supposed to be there either.

I could be wrong, but supposedly Vega could end up being the Pole star at times, next in the celestial sky.

Here a white main sequence star some 26 light years away, and next no reason to believe that any life should be present or found there either.

Except for both opening and closing our eyes for that of sometimes blinking, we could be still left with both Probabilty and also that of quantisizing, for that of not making it
any fools of ourselves, in that we could also leave it to our imagination and senses, for also making it a particular issue.

I still could be left believing in a naked woman lying on a table, for that of having a couple of eyelids removed and so on, and next also a Dyson sphere which could be hiding a civilization in space,
possibly on a planet.

Assume both the sun, next also that of the Earth, for that of the solar system as a whole, and next also assume planets around other stars as well.

Even Neil Armstrong is not able to always make it right, because it becomes that of "drifting a little to the right", but next still about the possible vastness of space.

If you rather could make it both Buck Rogers, if not any Flash Gordon, for that of dinner possibly served, at least we could make it a Type I civilization for this,
except for no such thing as a Dyson sphere either.

If perhaps still not any "Dogma" either, also that comprehension could be a similarly difficult word to catch or grasp, because it for one thing could be about possible science,
and next also about Religion as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theology

Similarly, making it also Theology as the subject, and it could be slightly different than that of Religion itself.

Science could perhaps be still a possible endeavor when it happens, but next that it also could be about possible questions which could be asked.

Still perhaps two eyes for that of seeing, and next also in your face, except for no such thing as making it both Electromagnetism and also photons, when it could be already about
the "Fundamental Forces of nature".

If still only about "Little Green Men" perhaps, is science next supposed to sell, only because it could be about a different thing, rather than ourselves?

Make it still also a Dyson sphere, if not any naked woman on a table either, and we could also make it a similar Dogma for also asking a couple of other questions.

Therefore, perhaps still science for that of a Dyson sphere, while that of a Dogma could be more for that of the philosophical, in that it could be about the Universe.
ID: 1920636 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1920667 - Posted: 23 Feb 2018, 16:28:28 UTC
Last modified: 23 Feb 2018, 16:45:27 UTC

Perhaps a bit long in the previous, but I think it had some meaningful words as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx

This time about a nasty story from the local environment, where a lynx is presumed to be making havoc among a couple of sheep.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx_(constellation)

Here perhaps more relevant to our own subject, and for this also distant globular cluster NGC 2419 as well.

A bit of a surprise a short while ago, because my mother had chosen to make it the larger shop here, where I also do the similar thing.

Next that she made it the wrong way back, and spent some 20 minutes here, before continuing on her way.

Personally I tried in the past using only a 2.4 inch telescope, but here unsuccessful, because if you rather make it Google Maps, and next also Florida,
also that human civilization now could be a visible part of the landscape, by becoming more a single feature for that of both roads and houses,
if not any cornfields or rivers for that of possible harvesting, or even fishing.

The only reason we could make it both a Type I, Type II and also Type III civilization, is because of that of space itself, and its possible environment, and should not be the same as
mistaking the handle for the door, when it rather should be the lock, in a dark room.

Make it only a small room for that of an opening, if not any possible credibility either, and we could end up leaving the subject perhaps open, rather than perhaps closed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rendlesham_Forest_incident

Or perhaps still I could wish I could be a scientist, in order for making such a thing possible.

If we should still know about any intelligence in nature, next have a look at ourselves only, except for making it any animals either, or even a similar constellation in the sky,
for that of a distant globular cluster.

If still perhaps both Order and Chaos still around, also that a similar Order could still be about a debate, if perhaps not always any Politics which could be carried out either.

One of the main reasons is that nature could still be better explained by using Equations, because it for that of Chaos only, could be lacking any similar "Laws" which could be explaining it better.

Make it also "Credo" as well, and it could also be about possible "Belief", if not any similar Equations which could be explaining nature in a similar way.

If perhaps having a look at the Universe with the naked eye, next no such thing as any galaxies either, but if rather using an X-ray telescope, or perhaps looking for an
infrared source, always the bit of difference which could be around, except for still making the Universe much the same.

For this also the better way of making it still a "hairy creature from alpha Centauri", rather than perhaps Vega, becuause it should also be part of the wording.

Except for not any similar hiding in the shadows, I still could make it rather Roswell the name of a place, or perhaps city, except for any picture of a weather balloon, in the hands of a military man.

Despite a bit of looking around, I never came any closer than making it the military establishment for this, and here I could be left to choose between the Manhattan Project,
and perhaps any Skunk Works.

Make it rather an alien retrieval, if not any UFO hunting either, and it could all be stacked up on a lorry, in order to next be driven away, if perhaps any true story at all.

If it still should be about a naked woman lying on a table, if not any Dyson sphere either, also that propulsion could still be that of a plane, if not any similar thing which could next travel
through both space and time.

Perhaps not about any validity for that of any science either, but if such a thing as an interchange program happened in the past, and next between humans and possible aliens,
rather more about a couple of chilly facts, which perhaps are not any dull or boring either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_Factor

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(1982_film)

Mentioned before for at least the first of these two, and next it becomes wrong for at least the first.

If for some reason we could still think that life itself could be possibly sacred, next perhaps still that of life, except for not any sacredness either, which next could be about possible Religion.

Personally I could still make it a difference between a credo for that of possible Belief, and next that of a similar Logic, which could be part of Mathematics.

If still rather a cult movie as well, for that of a dirty hero using a couple of similar words for that of going in, and next saving a President, next perhaps not the same as any similar way of Belief,
for that of making it the possible question of "Where are you coming, and next going".

Similarly my bad in the past as well, in that "Lost at sea" could also mean a similar Conscience as well, when it rather could be a question about possible Religion,
for that of rather making it "Consciousness".

Even Michio Kaku could be using such words in the name of science, for that of making it "Open up your mind".

Also that breaking a pencil between your fingers, should not be about any "Falling man" either, only because both could be a result of the world we are part of,
and next because also the Force of gravity.

It still could be a difference between that of salvation, and next also Salvation Army, and next also that of a savior, which could mean possibly God.

For one thing still that of a possible laugh when it rather should be about Logic, but next that neither Religion or Theology should be part of any science either, for that of a subject.

If perhaps still Dr. Strangleove for this, and he could be sitting on the bomb in the fuselage of the plane, and next be also doing so when it became dropped.

Or that it also could be still one thing of making it a burial using a coffin, when it also could be about Cremation as well, and next for those being deceased.

If not wrong, gravity could still be about Physics, and Hypnosis more for that of Parapsychology as a subject.

The reason for this is that we still could wish to make it the Universe possibly still science, because it should not be about any hidden world either.

Therefore, should any elementary particles be a better way of explaining the difference between an idiot and a genius, when rather Logic could be doing such a thing better?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galactic_Federation

Except for perhaps not any difference between the living and dead for that of such a thing either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aura_(paranormal)

Here only that of your fingertips against a dark background, like a speaker for a sound system, and it becomes quite well visible.

If still Physics, also that of Mathematics, but also that Metaphysics could be its own subject.

Newton could still make it some three Laws of gravity, when it also could be Equations, but similarly Einstein came up with an equation, which next could be explaining the notion of time.

But next only for the given notion itself, and not anything else, because it should not be about "Digging a grave" either.

But next hang on a little, because I was just born, and have to live through the rest of my life as that of a Process, only for that of experiencing possible Eternity.

Perhaps still that of a boxer in the ring for such a thing, if not any similar words either, but if perhaps still making it the Aura, could it next be "dinner served" for the rest of it being explained?

We should not forget both "Heaven and Hell" either, in that it could still be Creation myth, but is next Eternity synonymous with possible Wormholes,
which could be part of the Universe?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

Could I still make it the Big Bang for that of the Steady State Theory, in that it could be explaining things a bit better, or is it because it should be still science, rather than perhaps Religion?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

But next perhaps not any Logic here either, because it should not be an issue either.

Make it still also that of Intelligence as well, and next you also could make it that of Logic in a similar way, if possibly not able to deduce it in another way either.

I still could make it both "Heaven and Hell" for a couple of things, but is this because I could be a believer?

For one thing, still both a Hippocrite for that of a possible Hippocricy, except for not making it any Devil either for what it perhaps could be.

Here perhaps still the laughter which could be heard, except for not any loss or envy for that of losing a friend in a possible battle, or even among family.

Make it still both Religion and Theology, and also the different facets which could be around for each, next explaining in possible different ways a couple of subjects which could be at hand.

Make it a plane hitting a building, or perhaps tower, and for a moment the little man could also be visible in among the smoke.

Except for perhaps still a possible laugh, also that the Lord could both give and take, for a couple of things.

If still that of humans for ourselves, next also the human factor as well, in that nature could also be explained in a similar way, when it rather could be something else.

Make it still a Process, and it also could be a possible restraint, if not perhaps rather an exit door, which could be such for that of escaping a painful life.

If perhaps still the Method of Proof for a couple of things, not any similar for that of any Logic either, at least not always.

You could have a melody going like "All the birds", or the like, and it next could be a possible chorus or refrain.

Similarly you are not supposed to believe in a bird without a head either, except for perhaps still a couple of wings, but it still could be that of possible research.

Not with me right now, but we could also be having synonyms or the like for explaining perhaps one thing for another, in that it could still be the blue sky,
and next also for that of color only.

Here still that of perhaps 100,000 stars for a globular cluster, and also maybe 100 billion stars for that of a galaxy, but next also Probability which could be still used for that of
possibly counting, if not making it that of ourselves only for just the similar thing.

If still an assumption, next also a wild guess as well, for that of possibly doing so for that of making it only ourselves, for that of possible other civilizations.

If I could be having a 50/50 chance to just live, next also a similar chance for that of dying as well, except for not being born either.

Make it tools for that of Probability or the like, and it next could also become Statistics as well.

Perhaps nature could be still explained in a Formal way, if not any joke either, but rather that we still could be doing such a thing for the quest which we could be undertaking.

Back after the weekend shopping.
ID: 1920667 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1920937 - Posted: 24 Feb 2018, 23:40:00 UTC
Last modified: 24 Feb 2018, 23:45:47 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_intestine

And not about digestion here, you should also know.

Being reminded here about this now being a major source of death, or reason for such a thing, in that it also could be about cancer.

Like common deceases of the past, like that of lung cancer because of smoking, both intestine cancer and also Parkinsons decease has become those of today.

Also an article with my national broadcaster about people waking up with headache in the middle of the night, only because their homes are built on garbage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linoleum

Make it still both a home, and also a house for that of living, perhaps both plank and linoleum for that of the floor, if not any tile or chip with at least the bathroom.

Next, both brick and also perhaps concrete for the walls, if not any floor, or perhaps ceiling, and it becomes more that of weight, rather than a spooky dream.

Add to it both red, yellow and green for a possible traffic light, or stop, and next not any phosporous green either.

If you ask me if life could be possible with a liquid ocean on the surface of a planet, where it also is freezing cold, most likely not so,
and similarly I find it hard at times when it comes to perhaps thinking that we could be visited.

If not wrong, volcanism could now be found to mix up or combine with water also present, and next also be the possible ingredients for that of life.

Also that it apparently became the Hubble constant for that of the expansion of the Universe, which could be measured by means of both Cepheid type variables,
and also supernovae type I.

Like the collapse of the Soviet Union in the past, we also could make it such a thing when a star is exhausting its final resources, and is doing such a thing in its final stage of life,
but if perhaps still also Dr. Strangelove for that of possible madness, such a thing should rather be in our heads for that of a possible dream.

Take my advice. if any, because here also the dream having a couple of mirrors, and for each, a big man wearing black hair, and next a guitar in his hands,
and next the mirrors became aligned against each other, with also a couple of older people sitting in a bar, including one lady with white hair.

Except for that, finished off last nights session at sky-map.org again, and got to the SDSS part of the collection, for that of also a bit of colors.

Here SDSS for that of Sloan Digital Sky Survey, because if it should be still only about colors, in the same way as also "Flesh and blood" at times,
we could be still far off from making it any Creator for that of a possible wish, when it still could only be about nature.

This because there should be no secret that we ourselves could also be still a product of nature, and next we always could be questioning it with respect to itself.

Perhaps a bit of thin ice at times when it comes to that of being a possible witness to an event, but similarly I could make it still that of colors for that of possible Laws and Equations,
which also could be present.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color

Here it still could be about visible light, and also the rainbow as well, but if you rather make it infrared radiation, or perhaps microwave, it could be either a mobile phone.
or perhaps a micro wave oven for such a thing.

Make it perhaps Seti@home for still that of a project, and you rather could be telling about a couple of insane people, so why not make it still that of colors?

If still Flash Gordon for that of a bit of adventure, also that Electromagnetism should be electricity in full, and for this electrons making up a possible charge.

Make it rather a fallout from a nuclear disaster, like Chernobyl, and you could be having radiocativity, only because it could still be that of radiation.

Perhaps still a bit of colors associated with that of lightning, but next also only about electrons as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_interaction

Here perhaps no such thing as any Electromagnetism either, except for the fact that there should be no reason let it twist our ears either, in that Logic should always make the difference.

Perhaps still that of a drink which needs a bit of ice, in that you could end up in bed as well, but not with the drink in your hands, and for this, different chapters of a book.

Did you watch the movie Terminator II, where she is lifting the hands in front of her face when the thing goes off?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermonuclear_fusion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power

Here keying in device for that of weapon, by the way, because here on my way to the shop, and it should be only one or two such ones above.

Always the debate perhaps, except for not any fission either, but this not because of any radiation, but perhaps more about possible heat, or even visible light.

It lasts for only a brief moment, but the heat being experienced rather a quite long time, and also excruciating so.

So what is perhaps in that heat signature, if not any radiation?

Should it be electrons, or should it rather be gamma rays?

Think of it and next continue as well, in that it next could be a battle of sciences for that of possible Logic in itself, by next thinking that there always could be both winners and losers
for at least that of a game.

Either you could stumble and next fall hard, only because it could be about the Force of gravity, or you rather could make it Religion as the subject, for that of Apocalypse now.

But rather that science could still be a "weird" thing, in that it always could be about a subject.

For this always those things which you could see and next also not see, in a similar way as also making it "seeing is believing" for that of possible Logic,
but next still also in the hands of nature for such a thing.

Look around and Noah's Ark could be such a thing, while the Asian tsunami perhaps not, or perhaps rather the opposite way.

Roll-on, roll-off, and you could be having both a boat and ferry for such a thing, but next it could capsize and flip around.

If perhaps still also radiation from that of colors, making it red, yellow and green, also that waves could be about energy as well, in that it also could be radiation.

Should it not rather be about making it Energy when it rather should be Matter or mass, except for not making it the Force of gravity?

Here still also about the Hammer and Feather experiment as well, except for not any colors either, or that of perhaps making it photons for that of both visible light and also radiation,
when it also could be about the Strong Nuclear Force.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force
ID: 1920937 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2338
Credit: 920,166
RAC: 0
Message 1920943 - Posted: 25 Feb 2018, 0:00:05 UTC
Last modified: 25 Feb 2018, 0:01:07 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzwMM6v5qpA

I could still have the Saturday beer, because I missed the shop on Friday, or perhaps yesterday.

I will not be making references to other parts of this project anymore, like I also do not have any beer in the middle of the day.

Also that I probably do not beat Zalster on the credit either, but the question becomes if naivity becomes a replacement for that of possible stupidity,
in that you could also make it "affirm" and next also claim a couple of things you could be seeing.

Yes. down the drain for a couple of things, including contents, and next also that of a couple of colors as well, for what you could be able to see.

I am a little concerned about such a thing making "Rambo" a possible hero, when you also could be having innocent victims, and next it also could be a possible "excuse".

Make it also those wearing red skin, if not hair, and it next also becomes racism as well, and you could still be a victim.

Should a victim always be having an excuse at crying for help, in the similar way as a "hero" also could be innocent, and also be proclaiming his own things?

You know, except for always dinner being served, also a similar excuse, in that it also could be a story being delivered, or perhaps told as well.

Is Rambo supposed to be a racist, only because he could be a hero of sorts, or should it rather be that of "swastikas" for a couple of symbols?

Here perhaps "politicizing", except for not any look back at history either, but rather thinking about the victims here, and that it also became the wrong place.

Another word for this is "setup", because here you may also read it as the text "NAZI SECRETS 9PM", and personally I do not think this is the main issue either.

Or perhaps rather "wrong" for such a thing.

Fearing for you life, it could also be about possible innocence as well, and for this, who needs a hero?

Proclaim it, or that for a thing, and it also could be a possible "regulative".

Think of ageing as still a "calculated" issue, which like evolution as well, also could be computed, using the necessary tools, if not that such a thing should be by means of random chance either.

Fall down for that of a couple of shots being heard, and you could be having the leaves of the ground pricking your nose.

If still a victim of sorts for a couple of things, also a victim of circumstance, except for not any winner for that of a situation either.

Here making it a difference from that of a possible event which could also be happening.
ID: 1920943 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1921014 - Posted: 25 Feb 2018, 6:40:17 UTC
Last modified: 25 Feb 2018, 6:45:22 UTC

And perhaps rather Syria for that of a possible "three-star" rating, for at least a bit of suffering,

Or next also a bit of blood being spelt or thrashed away as well, if not any shed.

Never mind.
ID: 1921014 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1921017 - Posted: 25 Feb 2018, 6:55:31 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSeJckOUZrs

I choose not to click reload here.

But should it be about a possible "Humble stance" here, or should it rather be about greediness, because it next could be about nature (as well).
ID: 1921017 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1921018 - Posted: 25 Feb 2018, 6:56:13 UTC
Last modified: 25 Feb 2018, 6:57:27 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSeJckOUZrs

Upload problem.

I choose not to click reload here.

But should it be about a possible "Humble stance" here, or should it rather be about greediness, because it next could be about nature (as well).
ID: 1921018 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2338
Credit: 920,166
RAC: 0
Message 1922185 - Posted: 2 Mar 2018, 20:31:19 UTC
Last modified: 2 Mar 2018, 21:16:50 UTC

Or it could be made a link here for this as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQ2sKwwhRgI

Here the fourth restart of the computer in a row on a Friday evening, and also that I lost my posting as well.

The strange thing is that it sometimes could return back later on for that of its visibility.

Also that sequence could replace row, and also appearance for that of visibility, when it next becomes such a thing.
ID: 1922185 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2338
Credit: 920,166
RAC: 0
Message 1922262 - Posted: 3 Mar 2018, 1:27:09 UTC
Last modified: 3 Mar 2018, 1:53:29 UTC

Making a new one, because here please have me excused again, but perhaps Andrew Siemion (with UC Berkeley) could still make it that of listening devices only,
for at least that of listening, while other people could get a sense of being visited, sometimes in their own homes, or houses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQ2sKwwhRgI

For now perhaps not so much in the news, because it rather could be about both tornadoes and also lightning for at least the weather, if not any gun control either.

Make it rather a question of life itself, and also a possible debate for this as well, perhaps we are not any better off now than some 10 or 20 years ago.

As I tried to mention before it once again broke down, a given measure could always be about Logic, if not still about numbers, for that of comparatability.

Here such a thing as <,<=, =, > and >= for at least logical operands, where it also should be arithmetic or numerical operands.

The visual spectrum is only part of the whole spectrum, and should be about waves and not any elementary particles.

Make it rather "good, better, best", and also Guinness Book of Records for this, which is not any preferred either, because when at least hearing the word "FRB",
for that of "Fast Radio Burst", it was my original thought, or perhaps idea. that this was not any relevant at all, and therefore not signify any extraterrestrial life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fast_radio_burst

Perhaps it rather should be so, for that of fact, in that there always should be a different, or perhaps more relevant explanation, than just someone visiting, or perhaps even in your head.

Here science still perhaps sells, but perhaps not any numbers in a similar way, because the latter could also be considered as being "poor man's science".

Presumably not any water itself, or even air, should be responsible for life as we currently know it, and for some purposes we could be still looking at the subject of Religion.

While both uniformity and also homegeneity becomes yet two more words, also that gravity could be unifrom, in that it could be present, and also dominant throughout the whole Universe.

Next that Mars became the single month in the Calendar with also a planet in its name, or perhaps vice versa, or perhaps it rather should be March.

If you could set given criteria for a couple of factors, by making them both equal, and also different, also that a given notion of the presence of possible E.T could still be the same,
independent of any such factors which could be possible.

I think we actually made a bit of fun of this in the past, because it was found not to be working, including that "prerequisites" could also mean possible expectancies as well.

So, rather than perhaps Probability itself, it could end up being about the Elimination Method, or perhaps Method of Elimination, only because we could find it not to be working.

With my national broadcaster, there was a clip showing a chimpanzee enjoying a trip in a small plane, and getting close friends with the pilot.

Again, yesterday for this, and I did not get to the clip itself, but only that there should be a close inheritance between us as humans and chimpanzees,
whlle that of possible extraterrestrials should more relate or pertain to different solar systems, where at least different paths for that of evolution, should be more common,
or perhaps prevalent.

Make it alpha Centauri, and it could be almost like or akin to the sun.

Next it could be hard making it any difference at all, if such a thing as evolution, or at least natural habitat for that of an environment should be considered.

Add to it the fun thing, if not any "la-la" as well, and we also could both think and presume that here also there could be planets as well, only because life could be taken as
both granted and also a prerequisite as well, for at least making it an intelligent civilization for such a thing.

If listening also was that of detecting, next that intelligent life should perhaps already be detected as well.

Really, Charles Darwin could still make it evolution for also making it possible conditions for life, and next also make it that of simiilar prerequisites as well.

Next I become stupid, or perhaps a fool myself, by also adding, or introducing the subject of Religion into the whole thing.

I still keep listening in, and here missing a couple of words right now.

Or perhaps rather "affirm", for what possibly was said somewhere else, if not perhaps making it still infinity for that of the possibilities which nature could still offer.

Should our unique place in the Universe be only because of such a thing as Religion itself, or should it rather be the fact that mostly every star could develop or harvest life in one way or another?

Here still that of "Survival of the fittest" for a couple of things, while there also could be such things as Chaos, only because there could also be similar Laws and also Equations as well.

It really makes me think a bit of Newton mechanics here, and also the notion of time, by means of Einstein, when next also considering such a thing as Quantum mechanics,
and next it also could be a discussion about life itself, by means of a similar Probability, which was more my thought here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_cell

It better should have been mentioned before, but perhaps not being so.

For that of the lost post, I also stumbled on the word "Ordinary", in that it should also be ordinary number here as well.

For this, also that of both transcendental and irrational numbers, and next also another, or different discussion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

Here general subjects for also general terms, but next for which not all answers could be readily answered.

So here the thought that the Hubble Deep Field, and also Hubble Deep Field could give a look back at a "Primordial universe", by next looking back into the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthworm

Next that the earthworm could be coming back and eat you, because it also could be a cannibal, because here my wrong error of thought of making it predators,
when it rather should be about carnivores.

A bit uncertain about the word above, but rather that predator should be replaced with the other word starting with "p" which of course I forgot.

Of course it should not be any such thing as predators, or even reptiles, for what we could be doing, but if not wrong, such a thing as the WOW signal,
for now gets the arrows down for both its authenticity, and also credibility, so next still the question of what we perhaps are doing, if also nothing could be accomplished,
at least by means of possible credibility.

Think of perhaps always one answer for that of a question being asked.

Next silly me again, in that I could make it at least gravity for that of the expansion of the Universe, and next also the notion of time.

But rather that we could be left still unanswered on the question of life itself, only because it could be about the subject of Probability.

"Where do we come from and next where do we go", always could be the big question, and except for both a speeding wagon, if not any bullet,
it always is supposed to be going in a forward direction, and not any backwards.

Make it the very long freight train, and always the locomotive at the front, and perhaps also rear, and next also the wagons in between, which needs to be connected.

Here it is just such a simple thing, namely bend backwards a little bit, for that of attaching the rope.

If perhaps still that of Stem cells above, and next also Laws for that of the Universe, at least two part for such a thing.

Should God next be responsible only because there could be both prime numbers and also Stem cells around, and next also "Sing a song" as well?

I could still ask myself "How long do I last", but not necessarily "What are my chances".

If it still could be about life itself, it could also be a battle for that of cancer, if not such a thing as making it a Type II civilization, and next think that it could be still about Probability.

Compare with this analogy, namely that you are standing in a room, and next it comes caving in and you are hit by a brick.

Should it next matter if only one hits your head, or it rather should be a million, only because listening in also should be about a similar Probability, and it will perhaps never succeed.

Or perhaps "without any doubt" either, because here the other day I happened to be superstitious, for that of having a couple of ghosts in my home.

Beware the wolf, but you could be still struck in the head, and also be learning a lesson, but if such a lesson is learnt the hard way, should it still be about Probability?

I once again heard an African leader, perhaps Tanzania, using the word "emphazise".

Here that of emphasizing a possible meaning, if not making it any "absolutes" either, for that of a possible thinking.

For this, "given this, and next also that", and here the word given itself.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=82571&postid=1917594

Perhaps not any art itself here either, because I have not read it all.

Also that j mercer like myself probably know the subject of astronomy quite well, and know what it is all about.

But next, tease tease. and even such a thing as a Type II civilization might not be easily explained away either, only because it could still be about Probability.

Here the fifth restart of the computer, but able to salvage my posting this time.

Dang it, or perhaps nuts, because I could make it "dig a grave" in the past, and next also think that we could live forever.

Not a similar log for Google Translate right now, except for coming across a quite nice word for that of possible gratitude.

Here perhaps spelt "gratious", while at least the Spaniards could say "thanks", because here lost the word.

Also when checking in, it could be the word "apparatus" for that of a listening device, including a radio.

Make it both a row and also column for that of a single march, also that of a pace, tact, or stroke, is needed.

Add to it also that rhytm, and it could end up being the musical rhytm as well.

A heart could sometimes need a defibrillator in order to work correctly.

Next, perhaps "For Christ sake". if not perhaps what you chose to say.

The old Indians, if not any Aborigines either, could choose to count, and next make it one, two, many..

Or perhaps define Probability in a similar way as well, in that it should not be about only one versus many for that of making it such a Proabability,
when we next could also count, and make it at least a couple of billion stars, only in our own Milky Way.

If not wrong, Andrew Siemion is perhaps not a believer either, but at least that he could count, next also making it different civilizations which could be possible.

Am I perhaps still confusing that of Probability for that of Logic, where it rather should be only about counting?

Or perhaps rather a question here for Eric (Eric Korpela) about whether he knows about both M32 and also NGC 205 as being satellite galaxies of the Andromeda galaxy,
and that it also should mean the enormity, if not vastness of space?

We could still be back at that of comprehension again, not only because it could be "strike any luck" either, for that of possible Probability (again),
but rather that comprehension should come before a similar incomprhehension, which should make a couple of things incomprehensible.

You, know, like also Statistics, rolling a dice only, is perhaps not about Probability either, only because it could be simple and easy for one thing,
and next perhaps difficult or hard, for the other thing.

Have a walk in the middle of the night, but rather you choose to use the bicycle.

For that of a light, you could attach a dynamo to the wheel, and while spinning around, also deliver light to your flashlight.

Add to this, and also a generator for that of electricty production, if not any production facility for that of hosting any nuclear fusion.

Make it rather detective work of sorts, and next also that of evidence.

Tamper with evidence, and next also tamper with given facts, if not any vice versa.

Here she is, namely the woman making it the song about "Running up the hill", if not any such evidence either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp43OdtAAkM

But if rather making it the Big Bang, astronomers could perhaps think that they could be coming up with a working model for at least the Universe.

Therefore, if perhaps not already said, or perhaps slipping away, still that of "Dismissed" for that of a session in a Courthouse, where you could be also become sentenced.

Here also the story about the possible free fall, without a parachute, and here I do not know the end result.

But when I next make it the word "Formal", it also could become "Methodology" for that of a similar practises.

Learn how to spell and next also "1, 2, 3" for a given or similar practise, if not readily assuming that intelligent civilizations could be part of space in a similar way.

Should it still be that of "Master Mind" here, or perhaps "Tolkien", for that of Creation itself, because the latter could perhaps be interpreted?

The last thing coming up with the mind of Isaac Newton, is perhaps the notion of "Heaven and Hell", because it should perhaps not be about any time either.

Silent march, perhaps and also that Jesus could feed or nourish his citizens, or fellow companions, while still out in the desert.

Next perhaps "cuckoo" for that of an answer, and that I also mentioned that of Cynicism, which next could be a product of nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynicism_(philosophy)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynicism_(contemporary)

Here split into a two part discussion right now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato

Should tell that I like this one, because here perhaps a bit better than a couple of others.

So where is perhaps Logic told, or being the subject, amongst which perhaps is only about Philosophy, as a subject?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wp43OdtAAkM

So, perhaps both updraft and also downdraft for that of a bit of windchill, but I was also thinking about making it a "lie" for that of also going up and down a shafts of sorts,
which next could perhaps be a "Stairways of Heaven", if not any "Portal" either.

Perhaps not the most interesting either, but we could be having both the Event Horizon for that of a Black Hole itself, and next also the Schwarzchild radius.

Make it rather "Judgement Day", and next also perhaps a similar thing for that of a "guestimate", in that perhaps there could be still people thinking that there could be a couple of
things flying in the sky, but next that they could also be wrong.

If it still could be a possible notion of God, if not any science either, where could I perhaps go wrong?

If still the fireman for a couple of things, next also both the ladder, if not any sacrifice either.

Life only becomes a measure of death, in that at least life could be measured.

So here perhaps still that of Jesus for that of possible temptations, when it rather should be contempt for Court.

Oh, what a waste of time.

Looking up "beligerent", and it misses a possible spelling or misspelling, because it here does not take "beligerance".

Here perhaps Jesus and twelve disciples only, together at a table, and it could be that of a "Shrovetide".

Dangit, but Creation should still mean Matter Creation, and next also that elementary particles came into existence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence

Same here, because Existence could next also mean Existence of God, but next it could also be shown that it could be still a ladder. or at least a step away.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aura_(paranormal)

If it were not for my fingers either, against a dark background.

Thinking here that perhaps being biased should not always return any answer either.

What if rather "In the beginning" became a context, rather than perhaps a notion, for what Einstein perhaps said?

If still "We choose to go to the Moon (twice)" not because it is easy, but because it it is hard, next perhaps also a Model for that of the Universe as well,
including its possible Creation.

If still that of uniformity, if perhaps already mentioned. also that it could also be "breaking point" for such, if not perhaps not any "break even" either.

Launch a satellite, or rocket, and during its launch, it could meet its point in space where that of dynamic pressure is at its largest.

Here not all the practical details, but next perhaps "Heinecken", when it also could be both Pils, or Pilsener, and also Hansa, for that of possible beer.

But next that science perhaps still sells, in that it also could be a dynamo for that of dynamic pressure, except for not Gods hands at your feet either.

"You dare", and at least it could be still the story about elementary particles, if not any "Force" which also could be present.

If science for some reason should still go wrong, or perhaps part, it could be that of making it a grave for at least life itself, for next making it possible death.

I try to be polite, but when having the page for the American Civil War in front of me, also that of dead soldiers lying on the ground as well.

But are you next supposed to questioning death, rather than take it more or less for granted, when perhaps needed?

Or should it rather be about "Philosophical thinking" only, in that Matter Creation could also be about stars forming and next dying?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

Everyone knows that the last option, or perhaps option for

Roll the dice, and next also that of Probability as well, because my guess is that we are not supposed to question any Creator either, for what could perhaps, or supposedly be science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phosphorus

Yes, I already know it, namely "ashes to ashes".

Perhaps I am not that good at it either, but I could see and also think about both a neutron star, and also Black Hole in front of me, except for the "dirt" of daily life as well,
and next think that it could be at least Creation.

So, why the heck still about Philosophy, when it rather should be about only Religion?

Here we perhaps lost any science, in that it also could be a "Scientific foundation", but next what about still digging a grave?

Was it perhaps about the earthworm, and that I could feel a bit of sadness, for that of its broken back, or should it rather be about possible "Eternity", in that it could be the possible answer?

What if I happened to be the winner, and for this "1", and you the loser, next "0"?

Should there be such a thing as infinity here, only because it also could "encompass"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin

What concerns me, is that you could still be a hero for a couple of things, except for not making it any story either.

As I previously mentioned, each and every story also needs a separate Method of Proof, only to become trusted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance

Keep in mind that while still elementary particles on one hand, also that of extraterrestrial intelligence on the other, and next also a "parlor" for each.

Or perhaps that of questioning a possible Creator, when we next also could be that of Creation.

Should it next be the "Philosophical alternative", or perhaps option only for that of one thing, or perhaps both?

Or perhaps rather about Moderation, because it could be about both Music, and also Philosophy.

Same as before, namely "shut off".
ID: 1922262 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2338
Credit: 920,166
RAC: 0
Message 1922303 - Posted: 3 Mar 2018, 4:03:24 UTC
Last modified: 3 Mar 2018, 4:26:14 UTC

Or perhaps "groan, groan" for that of a bit of more sinister.

By the way, did you see, or perhaps catch President Trump wearing the tail of a pig?

The last thing you could perhaps encounter when making a rehabilitation program for that of your psyche (or at least state of your mind).
is not ending up, or encountering a similar situation yourself.

As I previously mentioned, science could be about (possible) Proof, but here it became late in the night, so could we perhaps be a bit more informal?

Anyway, for still that of a rehabilitation program in the past (which, or should it be at the top),
also that of a quite nice, or at least friendly woman, who was chosen to pick up here post, for what she was supposed to do.

So, here my uncle chooses to kick away a couple of pieces of dirt for what is supposed to be a funeral, next for my father.

Next that Dick perhaps still is an abbreviation for making it also Richard, if not perhaps any Helen either.

Here "abrupt" next spells or translates into "abruptly" as well, and except for perhaps not any "Cocoon" either, for that of a movie, always that death itself
could be having a similar poisture, if perhaps not any similar laugh either.

So, E=mc2 for starters, and next you could be the possible idiot.

What is next my possible relationship with any superior being, except for not any kicking of dirt using your shoes?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence

Again, and whoops. what an elegant Proof as well, for at least that of a Model.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formalism

Yes, speaking about possible deities here.

When Harry met Sally, or perhaps rather that of Axioms, in that it also could be about the Existence of God.

Personally, and I think many or most would disagree, but making it an Atheist for that of a possible believer, if not any Agnostic either, perhaps should not count that much.

Rather look at Creation itself, and next also a deep breath as well, for that of the stupid fool I could perhaps could be.

If perhaps rather Cosmology as the subject. next also perhaps none, rather than "nevertheless" for that of the subject.

Needs translation, but here "imbesilic", or the like, could still mean silly fool, or idiot, except for also knowing that nature is perhaps not about that.

So, roses perhaps, except for not making any tulipans either

(For possibly still questioning nature),

Here we go again, for that of possible materialism, in that such a thing also could mean "Intelligent Design", except for not any destruction either.

I do not know the language here, but in Latin something like "quid" or the like, meaning "Doing me a favor, and next also me doing you a favor.

Everyone knows that a will should also be a testament, so why still the notion of the living dead, when perhaps no such thing either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War

Whopsie, but the fallen soldier became lost here, or perhaps out of the picture.

Measure is short of measurement, and make it next Andrew Siemion for such a thing, also a given measure for at least measuring that of Probability.

Yes, on the hoof, if perhaps not any cheap either, because here also about a possible Creator for that of our Existence.

I think it could end up being the wrong discussion, but for some reason, if not any times, perhaps that of mortality versus immortality for that of the possible discussion.

Next, put it in order. and at least question God, because it also could be about science.

Here you perhaps know as well, namely that of bias, versus possible Opportunism.

But next, zig-zag. if you will, because I next also could be seeing God.

Or, perhaps still different forces at work, if you will, in that it could be still both Heaven and Hell.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Prayer

Needs checking here.

In my opinion, Creation should be a deviation for that of Creation, in its words.

You could be the saint, or perhaps spirit, in perhaps making it both Heaven and Hell, when it next also could be science, but next perhaps not for sure.

If not wrong, a Dogma could be a general question about the Universe itself, next by means of a possible alien.

For this, we could be perhaps be still better off and next also ask the similar question.

Here "grant" and perhaps not a user either, but rather that it could be a scientific grant for that of making it both a purpose and also a meaning.

Make no excuse. but perhaps even the Ten Commandments could be on thin ice here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algebra

For this, also relational databases, as well.

The ugly thing is that I do not see any "beginning" here either, for at least relational databases.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence

Same here, because only the word "Empirical" itself here.

If perhaps both ground itself, next also an argument as well, and next also a thought as well, which next could become a "Philosophical argument" as well, for at least that of God.

One thing I perhaps could be afraid of, is that science next could be taking God for granted, only because of a couple of philosophical thoughts.

Yes, yes, yes, at least for that of a Method.

Anyway, so perhaps still only Capricorn One for this?

Why if I rather shut it up and next could rather only be making it that of space?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarean_section

Or perhaps rather a newborn grown with hairs and all the like and next born dead.

Hokus pokus, or perhaps "Hokus pokus filiokus".

Next that life perhaps is only by means of chance, and next also by means of offering.

So, who are next supposed to question any Method, if not any miracles either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment

Here for now, because again it slipped, or vanished out of my thoughts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hoc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%C3%A9j%C3%A0_vu

Suggestions only above.

Yes, suckers, make it that of possible Creation, and it also could mean Creativity, if not any "Intelligent Design" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design

What it a method was perhaps "flawed" and the next found to be at least working?

Assume Creationism, and next also "Stylism" as well, for that of a couple of words.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style_(visual_arts)#Stylization

Need reading the article, but perhaps quite nice here, except for perhaps needing a bit more as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihilism

v

But next perhaps "In the beginning".

v

Or perhaps arrows down for that of science.

How come. or should I perhaps come or get to the opposite conclusion?

Or perhaps rather a trap, rather than a similar answer. in that this could be a question asked for, or raised, numerous times before,
except for not receiving an answer at all.

Yes. speaking of. and next also the moment as well, and could this next also be about a Shepherd as well, only because I sometimes could be left to choose?

Oh, yes, you could be still in the garage for at least parking your car, but next what about a progenitor star visible in the sky?

If next such a thing as deities perhaps far fetched for that of possible science, perhaps not true either.

Make it Creator, rather than possible Creation itself, and next also the trap as well.

Again, that I could think or perhaps make it Creator, rather than Creation here, but next the church, buh.

So, if for you who perhaps did not read, I made it, or perhaps came to the conclusion, that God was perhaps "heavy handed" in that he also could be making it also "Heaven and Hell".

If perhaps drawing such a conclusion, also that you should know as well.

Any Ethics, Norms, or even parlour for that of Justice should add, or be included here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parlour

You see, ends up in nothing for that of a possible discussion above.

Needs a possible edit above.
ID: 1922303 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2338
Credit: 920,166
RAC: 0
Message 1922316 - Posted: 3 Mar 2018, 4:24:28 UTC
Last modified: 3 Mar 2018, 4:28:50 UTC

So, any roses perhaps, except for not making any tulipans either,

Edit: (For possibly still questioning nature),

Edit; For Andrew Siemion here: Perhaps we already know (about) science here.

So it goes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rL0xboiSoo

Edit: But here perhaps nice, but next who is selling the stuff for next possible scientific validity?

Needs checking here.
ID: 1922316 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1922333 - Posted: 3 Mar 2018, 4:58:36 UTC
Last modified: 3 Mar 2018, 4:59:12 UTC

Hang out here, because I still like what Catcus Bob could say.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYIk2kfiL0Q

Here for some reason, cut and paste twice. for next much the same.

Perhaps the link itself for now only could perhaps suffice.
ID: 1922333 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1922338 - Posted: 3 Mar 2018, 5:10:47 UTC
Last modified: 3 Mar 2018, 6:10:46 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYIk2kfiL0Q

Perhaps the head title became wrong here.

Getting back at it.
ID: 1922338 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1922348 - Posted: 3 Mar 2018, 6:14:20 UTC
Last modified: 3 Mar 2018, 6:32:45 UTC

Perhaps rather it should be about Adolf Hitler for at least past of history?

Or maybe it rather should be only about music instead?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U3A-lJQlrmk

Here "Delete my comments as well", but also that i happened to listen in at Steven M. Greer as well.

Ah, suckers, perhaps not for your television show either, at least what I could tell.

If so, what is still the true, or genuine answer out there?
ID: 1922348 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1922354 - Posted: 3 Mar 2018, 6:39:28 UTC

Should perhaps read "slowly" in in its tracks here.

Unable to edit the thread title right now.

Sorry about that.
ID: 1922354 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1923204 - Posted: 7 Mar 2018, 22:58:10 UTC
Last modified: 7 Mar 2018, 23:22:03 UTC

Guess what happened?

The doorbell rang here earlier on, and it was my aunt standing outside.

I also have a doorbell besides the entrance door to my flat, but here living on the second floor, with people both one floor, and also two floors,
if not any levels below, only a couple of stairs up from street level.

I think I mentioned this naming problem before.

But even worse is that it was unexpected, because I had thought, or was of the impression of telling that her help was not wished for anymore,
because for one reason, I have found her to be impulsive in her way of thinking, rather than cautious, and that when next doing a couple of things in a
similar way, it also could go wrong.

Here translated into "acting or done without forethought".

As I thought, translates into "acting or done without forethought" for that above.

Either I am a bit terse, or I shall rather let the reality of life also be part of my life as well, but I perhaps mentioned the air balloon coming with a purchase earlier on,
which happened to be punctured by my uncle, only because it was "trash" standing in the kitchen.

I usually do not do the weekend shopping on Wednesdays, but except for only walking, and not running, I was back in about 45 minutes or so, but also knowing that I
already have a quite filled up kitchen, as well as a fridge not working correctly.

Needs getting back at, but in the slope of the road where water could be coming down during a heavy downpour, it came to me that it could be still a deputy for that of keeping
a bit of Law and Order in the streets, except for not any sheriff either.

Therefore, also sometimes a Deputy Commander for that of an acting position, for at least the military, except for not any man in charge of a given Project as such.

For this, I guess Deputy Commander Charles I. Halt for the Rendlesham Air Force Base, and next also Leslie Groves, for that of the Manhattan Project.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leslie_Groves

For at least one of these, at least when only a project is being concerned, also that of a scientist as well, who in the worst case, or perhaps outcome,
could end up becoming a "scapegoat".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_I._Halt

Therefore my possible confusion here, in that there could be a scientific part for at least one project here, but perhaps not the other.

The Manhattan Project definitely is part of history, and also became possible because of scientists, but for the Rendlesham Forest Incident, only the military men as
direct witnesses to the event itself.

The article should tell for itself, and particularly the section "Post-military", where it should be no doubt that such a thing could be about at least Credible Witnesses.

So sad, in that at least for a couple of things, we could make it "lies" for that of lying, and next also a table for such, if not any "Ready to go" either, for that of a finished job.

In my best moment, I could perhaps make a point of that of possible hysteria being noticed when it could be something making a dive in the sea, and next vanish,
but also that scientists may not always be witnesses to an event actually happening, despite possibly having a credible reputation.

Here at least an answer possible when also there may not be such an alternative either, only because there could be a difference between the Man in the Street,
and next a Chemist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemistry

Of course it could rather be about Logic as well, but I think this also became mentioned in the past.

You perhaps could see such a thing as "top-down programming", only because the other way should not be possible, except for perhaps rather doing it the opposite way.

For this, also those things which were mentioned before, including Linda (or Linda Hamilton) for "Up on your feet", except for not any dices which could be rolled, for that of Probability.

If science could still be about Entertainment at times, also that it could be cheap as well, and also dealing with the notion of life and death when it comes to an issue.

We still could be having Roussian Roulette for such, where chances could be some 50/50, or it could rather be the endless, or repeating pattern of the weather,
which for some reason could also make for such a thing as climate change happen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

Here a little more about Mathematics right now, because here thinking about the notation "lim", which I have also noticed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_(mathematics)

Getting there in just two keystrokes when next keying in.

But here rather the borderline except for not any "knock-knock" on the door either.

Because here it also became that of knocking on a door when next perhaps both a keylock, and next also a handle, for that of a possible look inside.

Guess we still could be having a discussion for such, except for perhaps not any closer either.

It could still be about both microcosmos and macrocosmos, of course, but here the other day it became a couple of pages for USA Today popping up in the browser.

http://www.usatoday.com

https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/science/2018/02/28/signals-received-cosmic-dawn-nearly-14-billion-years-ago/382367002/

Here sometimes getting directly at the article in question as well, except for not any such showing distant galaxies with a similar blueish background.

Sometimes ugly net for this, and because of that not always readily back on the spot when needed.

I have not yet checked, but it could also be in the news right now that Dr. Stephen Hawking right now also knows what came before the Universe.

Perhaps same discussion as before, except that biased is not the same as any preconceived either, for at least a possible opinion.

Here apparently a change in the translation as well, because earlier the different words became stacked up here for that of choosing,
so here initially becoming the wrong word, perhaps even twice.

With respect for that of winter, I better have the piece of ham and flat bread before the cup of coffee, even when just back in the door.

This because here still giving a thought about both Dark Matter and Dark Energy, and also that it always could be one thing before the other.

You already know that I made it the World in motion, only because it could be about Creation at times, but also that it could be about Inertia as well,
and when looking at couple of thoughts currently around, also sensing that perhaps something is still missing.

No doubt that we always could make it the better science for a couple of things, except where it perhaps all started.

If next still about science as well, at least we could have both the climate itself, if not any climate prediction, and next also make it a similar Proof as well,
for also thinking that we perhaps may not be alone in space.

So, except for not any cheap either for that of Entertainment, also that digging in the sand should not be the same as any Impact in three minutes either,
because it could be both that of digging in the sand of Mars, and also a couple of experiments which were not fruitful, or perhaps not futile.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Miller

My sense is that at times it could be about life in general, and sometimes about the similar from perhaps a human perspective, in that it also could be about ourselves.

It could still be about both the lock and also the handle for such a thing, except for not any mountain where you could be looking down on a couple of things,
but it should be no secret that both Dark Matter and also Dark Energy, like also a couple of numbers, rests on a fundament, or perhaps foundation,
where a couple of given parameters are already known, and the rest therefore becomes science.

In that science also could be such a thing, also that it could be about possible advancement as well, and next for that of knowledge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_cycle

Here looking up "Conjunctures" using Google Translate, while also listening in at a couple of funeral words for that of a respected man passing away at old age.

Yes, both simple and cheap at times, at least for a couple of things, except for not making it any "Love and Marriage" either for that of also making it also more complex.

The story about the Three Wise Men is perhaps not one which should be trusted, or perhaps believed, if not any history books either,
but rather that you could spend a dime, or perhaps dollar, for watching a movie in a cinema, when still five dollars left in your pocket.

This also for that of both past, present and future, in that it could be about known facts, versus those which are not yet known, and next needs to be predicted.

So, if rather questioning what science is perhaps is about, it could be still about those knowns versus those unknowns, for which it could be at least facts,
if not any forgotten things either, which could be left for the future to be decided, if not any predicted.

Add to it both 1+2=2 and also both bronze and silver for that of a gold in a competition, only because it could be about a pedestal, but next perhaps not such a thing as any
"Stairways to Heaven" either, because a similar look ahead could be impossible.

A classic example is still that of fission versus fusion, where it for one thing could be about at least Mathematics, when it also could be Fundamental Laws of Physics.

I probably mentioned that of "dismissed" before, in that it could be about such a thing for the military, if not any such idea that even Formalism could be about possible "Truth",
and next also explaining nature.

Take an example from astronomy, if you will, and make it at least Aldebaran for a K type giant star.

Compare with Arcturus, and it is also a K type giant star, but also a population II star, meaning that it is old, much like the red halo stars surrounding the Milky Way.

Here zooming in on Altair probably yesterday, only to become lost in the glare from the star when using sky-map.org .

Need adding the details here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_population#Population_II_stars

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_population

So if perhaps each and every star also a progenitor, if not any prerequisite for that of life itself, only because it should be about both air and water, and also a planet as well,
perhaps no such thing for neither of the older stars above, except knowing that Altair could be rapidly revolving along its axis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altair

Because of that, it is oblate in its physical shape, or visual appearance.

Not because of the emptiness of space itself, but rather because of both stars and planets, we also could think that there may also be life around.

Only because of infinity as the possible limit itself, you next get a "knotted" world, which for at least one thing could be visible using a map of the sky.

Here the map at the top right for that of Altair, as an example.

This because while still making it that of infinity, of course, also that you could derive at least celestial coordinates, by making it such a map.

Here one wording could still be "silly me", if not any black cat across the road, or even stupidity for sometimes killing off the cat, if not any else,
but rather that both ideas and hypothesis should precede that of both results, and similar conclusions, before even more is being attempted,
and still for that of a possible achievment only.

For this still the dimensions of the world, including the point itself, and also that of trigonometry, which also could be used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometry

So, next. what is the point, except for not any "To the point" either, in that it could be still both Dark Matter and Dark Energy, except not any "Trust your feelings, Luke", either.

Or perhaps rather senses, instead of feelings above.

The reason why scientists sometimes could be making it both Dark Matter and Dark Energy, is because they know that there is a discrepancy between the Laws of gravity, by Newton,
and next the phenomenon, called "Inflation", which next could be explaining the expansion of the Universe.

Is there any difference between flesh and fat, only because I could be sitting here, and next also some 60 % water, except for not any "sitting duck" either, for that of a
meteorite or asteroid which could be coming my way, and next hitting me in the head?

Rather it becomes only a bit of speculation, in the same way as a famous explanation also could tell about the possible exit door for that of life itself.
except for not any cyclic roundabout either, which could be about a similar start versus end.

You always could drive into a tunnel with the hope of seeing the light at the other end, except for not any trap either, which could mean possible perdition and every hope lost.

We already know that at least elementary particles could be explaining a couple of things, except for not adding the notion of time as a limit, rather than a possible constraint.

For this also "Ready, steady, cook" as well, in that I could be a Naturalist of sorts, but perhaps not so for that of any crocodiles either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalism_(philosophy)

If perhaps both a bit of luck, next not any bit of sorrow either, for rather making it a still a black cat across the road, and next also an accident perhaps happening.

Rather than perhaps yet again, it rather could be about a probability for such a thing at least happening, and next within a framework of nature, in that it could be
at least laws for such a thing.

So, while Mathematics is perhaps the tool of making it Order and next also Chaos, when it rather could be both, for "Order and Chaos" side by side,
also that it could be still the tool for explaining such a thing, and also while it could be nicknamed such a thing, at least in German.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gleick

Here a bit of sad news when reading about his private life.

But also that we could be having that of a "tax exempt" at times as well, except for not leaving anyone alone left to die on the kitchen floor.

Whether perhaps for both good, or even bad, always one reason for next also an explanation, and also that of similar Equations, which next could be telling about the same.

For this still the subject of Cosmology, which could be telling about at "One thing for another", for where it next could be both coming and going.

The Butterfly Effect could be about an event happening, which could next mean possible change, if not perhaps any notion of time either, which could be that of
possible Instantiation.

Throw a ball through the air and next you could be still standing, except for not three competing on drawing a rope on each side, having all three next falling on their back.

Making it at least "retro" for that of an engine, and next not any return back to Earth either, but it rather should be counteracting Forces against each other.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis

We could be still in our backyard for what we sometimes could be doing, except for not making it any galaxies either for that of space itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypotenuse

Strange how sometimes words resemble each other, but for one thing we could be left with still Probability for that of guessing, except for not any engine either,
which could be used for possible space travel.

Here the fact that Probability should also be about Logic, in that you perhaps could believe in both the jet and also rocket engine,
but perhaps not the engine which could be used for possible time travel.

So, which laws for any propulsion, if not any space travel either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Combustion

Make a laugh of it, but the Greek could still make it both earth, wind, soil and fire, except for not the fire which could be burning down your home.

You are not supposed to build any cottage out of plywood either, but also that it still could burn, except for not any heat of the sun, or perhaps microwave,
or rather that you also could make it nuclear fusion from hydrogen only, because it also could be water.

Compare with the mentioned photon, where it for one thing could be an elementary particle for that of such above, when also about the Strong Nuclear Force.

If we for some reason were left to believe that rather making it a craft of sorts, it also could be an alien or extraterrestrial craft, and this because of an interchange program
which probably happened in the past, and

One thing is therefore proving an intelligent signal, while the other could be proving whether such facts, or perhaps story being told, could be possibly true.

So, if perhaps still about 60 % water for that of myself, also that Logic should be part of Intelligence, in the same way as also Arithmetic is part of Mathematics.

The translator droid known as C-3PO in the Star War movies, could be making it "Here we go again", except for not making it a story for that of given facts,
and next also becoming part of history as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_field_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations

Mentioned in the first link above for that of the second, but here no such thing as "Tell me a lie" either, for that of Logic, in that it rather could be about Electromagnetism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy

Keying in "Life" in the Wikipedia, and also Life expectancy as a possible suggestion, and next perhaps that of Probability as well.

Here getting a sense that at least Logic could be an absolute science on its own, while both Prediction and also Probability could be about a given measure, like also Statistics.

Can you next, or is it possible to make it any similar measure for that of Hibernation, in that it also could be about traveling between the stars?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hibernation

If rather making it a possible Type I civilization for such a thing, it next could become a hard landing in the streets of Vilnius, Lithuania, only because they chose to do such a thing.

The fact is that you could still make it Combustion for a couple of things, including both jet and rocket fuel, and also a similar travel to the Moon,
except for not any Equations either, which rather could be telling about nuclear fusion as a given possibility.

For this still only the Laws of nature at our hands, if not any disposal, except for not thinking of possible Type I or Type II civilizations in space, which rather could chose to be
doing a couple of things differently.

Sadly it could rather be that of a broken pencil at times, if not walking any thin line either, for that of sometimes thinking that we may not be alone in space.

For this, also sometimes "flawed" thinking as well, except for not thinking that nature rather could be flawless for that of its way of doing, and next also design.

If rather a given way of thinking, next also planet Earth, for that of the third planet next to the Sun, and also millions of stars in the Milky Way, like also countless galaxies
in the whole Universe, and so on.

Perhaps still "Have a nice day", if not any good for that of the worse, or even worst, but next is perhaps both Theology and also Religion about a subject which science still is not
able to master, or perhaps deal with?

Or is it rather that Mathematics could be still such, in the same way as also Physics, in that it also could be about no such thing as any Intelligence either,
and next that of possible extraterrestrial intelligence, which could be having it own possible meaning.

Meant as a question above, but since it became a hard start this time, I will rather relax and have a beer.

Back later.
ID: 1923204 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1923252 - Posted: 8 Mar 2018, 6:19:28 UTC
Last modified: 8 Mar 2018, 6:23:16 UTC

Here throwing up a bit of sorts, using the big plastic bin for my double salmon dinner.

Next feeling better as well and the saga as usual continues.
ID: 1923252 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1923256 - Posted: 8 Mar 2018, 7:00:19 UTC
Last modified: 8 Mar 2018, 7:02:59 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob

Came across this as well, and next also thinking that it could be slightly better as well.

The big misconception, or perhaps misnomer, in my opinion, is making a similarity between
that of both Agnosticism and also Atheism itself, for that of possible belief, except for not making any such thing as Mysteries, magic, and miracles",
or possible Myth itself, any similar.

Lost it right now, but when mentioning that of "deities" earlier on, by means of a possible reference,
it was also a similar reference with respect to yet another thing.

Here that of both aborigines, natives, and also indigenous people as well, and least for that of the Australian aborigines, it becomes that of collecting eggs from that of crocodiles,
for at least that of food, if not making it any religious process or ceremony either, by pulling a piece of wood straight through your nose.

Here of at least the functional, if not any physical, because the general thought, or perhaps rule of thumb, is making it both a heartbeat, if not any breath of air,
for at least making it physical, except for not any brainstorming either, which next could be that of the Metaphysical.

Therefore, still turn right when you rather should be turning left, or maybe vice versa, when driving a car, and next coming across the red light in an intersection.

Pump up the volume and next also the heart, for also the still trusted belief that left should still precede right, if not any right versus wrong, and that your hearbeat could next be your last.
for that of possible death happening, or as a result.

If still difficult to get at, or perhaps understand, also that of "abstract versus concrete", when it also could be about a painting, except for not the different part of the brain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyslexia

If rather still about "Morality", also that there should be no difference between right and wrong either, except for only the physical for a given purpose.

So, what happens if you still could be a fireman and next be climbing up the ladder, only to find one step of the ladder perhaps missing?

If perhaps so, the answer could be that you could just skip the missing step, and next continue climbing, in order to reach the top.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

Here perhaps a relevant subject itself, but what about a possible subject theme?

Still also a bit of Logic here as well, except for not any Formal Proof either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

Guess what, but science still perhaps sells, and for this next also a possible funeral.

Watching a YouTube video a couple of days ago, making it still that of life, also that of Intelligence as well, and next both a human being for such, and also possible
aliens as well, for that of extraterrestrials, in that they could be having a way of life much like ours,
and also a similar sense, if not any notion for that of both Morality, if not making it any Ethics or Norms either.

Next forget any Morality, when it rather could be the Ostrich, for that of its head dug in the sand, because like both Ethics and Norms, also Justice should be about Laws as well,
except for perhaps not any Laws or Equations for that of nature.

Always a difference between an Oath and that of Truth itself, but if not wrong, we could be still looking for the graviton, when it also could be the Higgs boson,
except for not any Photon either, which at least could be telling about the Strong Nuclear Force.

Perhaps even President Trump listened in at last, and for this perhaps no reason to make it a Joker, when it rather should be about an Ace.

Play a game of cards, and such an ace could next translate into numerical one, or 1, before 2, or two, except before the king as well, making it 14 numerical.

A couple of years ago, we had a television series with the name "Schroedinger's cat", on my local, or national television.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat

Guess I missed the whole thing.

Here I was thinking about the melody by musical band Genesis when posting the previous, and also before being reminded about the push of the wrong button,
because you could be waking up from bed.

Therefore, not that small thing, or perhaps important either, except that it once again slipped my mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heuristic

In the previous, it became that of Maxwell's equations, when it rather should be about "Field equations" for at least making it Einstein for such a thing,
and not any Electrodynamics either.

Like the single leaf itself, which next could be falling to the ground, also the branch, or branches of the tree itself, which next could become that of
either the Mandelbrot set, or perhaps Julia set, when it also could be about the Butterfly effect.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism

Compare with Determinism, which is the "philosophical theory that all events, including moral choices, are completely determined by previously existing causes".

If perhaps still only about Evolution, next also such a thing for both good and bad, except for not making it any broken pencil either, or at least any Infallibilism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infallibilism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infallibility

If not wrong. there could be other, more in-depth articles here as well.

But when perhaps still only questioning science, also that it could become Philosophy as well, before it eventually, if not at least also could become that of Theology as well,
for that of possible Religion.

And here the word "Epito...", or Epitomo... or the like, in the Wikipedia, which could be coming with more than one single article, and when next scrolling back,
getting lost here as well.

Getting back at it when I have it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotheism

You see, because it also could be the expression, except for not any "Get lost" either.

Think of me as perhaps both silly and stupid, when it next could be about both Logic, if not any Formalism either, which perhaps could be explaining things better.

Similarly, a drawing board also translates into a tablet as well, except for not any cupboard either.

If rather a puzzle, next also a game, if not lying on the floor either, for that of piecing a couple of things together, and next making it into one single piece.

So, except for not any if, Newton was still sitting below the tree and the apple next fell in his head, and he discovered gravity as a Force.

We could still be making it "Formal Logic", in that it next could be one thing for another, but except for not any sheet versus leaflet either,
also that a falling leaf could still be about the Butterfly effect, and also

I mentioned it before, and next also "Knock-knock" as well, except not any "knock-off" either, for that of making Formal Logic a similar "exempt",
next for that of a similar tax exempt.

But rather perhaps a whisper in my ear, in that I should rather believe in a couple of things, except for not making it any sacred either, for that of both Existence itself,
and next also our place in nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

Or perhaps rather making a false claim instead, when it rather should be about possible "Truth" itself.

Therefore. quite nice here, like a couple of other things, previously mentioned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Making it a possible claim, and it next also becomes a statement which not necessarily or always holds.

Therefore "Does God exist", could perhaps be about Formal Logic, if not an Axiom either, because here almost forgetting the Copenhagen interpretation of the whole thing.

For this, still the physical versus the Metaphysical as well, except not any Physics versus the subject of Religion, and here slipping my mind for that below.

Land of Confusion, by Genesis, I forgot to say.

Here perhaps not any poor writer either, ending up in an accident, where he also was losing his daughter (James Gleick).

But perhaps rather Order versus Chaos, when it rather should be about Order itself.

In fact, Neil Armstrong could be "strolling" on the Moon, while we still could be making Physics and Metaphysics two different subjects for that of possible "belief".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confusion

What if "Confusion" rather was about Logic as the subject?

Sometimes you could read about "net neutrality" in that a couple of things could be disputed.

For one thing we could perhaps make it Creation itself for both Matter Creation, and also Creation myth, except for not such a thought about a possible Creator itself,
except for perhaps either Theology or Religion, as the subject.

But next, hold on a little, because science is not supposed to be any Religion either.

For one thing, perhaps still "home sweet home", except not forever lasting either, for next making it Maxwell's equations, when it rather should be about Einsteins Field Equations.

If such a thing as Logic should still make a difference between the "Man in the Street", for that of possible Logic, you are welcome,
but I gave the thought of Creation itself being made, or come, with at least a heavy hand for such, in that it could be not difference.

For that of birth, both maternal pension is perhaps needed, if not any Caesarian section either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarean_section

Make it rather "enlighten" me at times, by means of the words of Lynn here, and next also possible devotion, except for not any "indulge" either.

Either looking for the backwards spelling of the latter word.

Or perhaps still rather the "trap", because you also could become hinged as well, by next making it Cosmology, and next you think you could understand it all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superior_Beings

Dangit!

My guess is that it could be still far fetched for that of making it still Syphilis for that of a possible decease, when it rather could be about a Clitoris, except for not any penis either,
for that of just "outstanding".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clitoris

Guess what, but it sometimes could be a weighted discussion, or club for that of a "moderated issue", if not any discussion itself, for a similar debate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity

Here adding the first link above next after the others, because not me here starting the original discussion.

Speaking of, and next also when speaking of, and next it could be about Matter Creation for at least that of Creation itself,

If next rather "concur" for that of a possible agreement, if not making it any Consensus either, it could be so because Religion could still be the preferred choice,
and next the way of explaining a couple of things.

Perhaps still the Shroud of Turin for such a thing, except for not any "shred of evidence" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shroud_of_Turin

Here, beat me, because it should be lack of evidence, and next also a similar Proof as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discipline

So, perhaps making it (both) "Heaven and Hell" as well for that of being an Agnostic?

But still that rather Formal Logic should next tell about both false and true, except for not any Axioms either, or perhaps Proof.

springboard

In a tournament, perhaps Gymnastics, you need a springboard, for that of jumping the fence, and next landing safely on the mat, or mattress.

Make it rather a feather, and it could be coming from a sparrow, if perhaps not any hawk, for that of a bird.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion

Possible translation or interpretation problem here.

Leaving it for you next to read, and make any possible conclusions.

For this, perhaps still an angle of approach, except for not any "Falling man" either, which perhaps is not any "Falling angel" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synonym

Yes, yes, yes, make it only WTC here, and you perhaps know the rest, except for not any "fallibles" or "infallibles" for such a thing either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction

Here translates into "Deductive reasoning" among a couple of other things, which I next made that of "Reason".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

Compare with both Logical and Formal Argument, and it next becomes only "Argument" for both.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

Next nit your shoes, except for not any laces or shoelaces either, in that at least for a couple of these things, we perhaps could rather see the Creator himself,
rather than making it possible Creation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

Better should have been mentioned before, if not perhaps already.

One thing is perhaps speaking about the "Daredevil", if it next also could be about bad or dumb luck for that of Probability itself.

Next, the other is perhaps making it still Religion for that of "Does God exist", except for not a chance in a million either.

Silly eh, but when perhaps still "Harry met Sally", next also "dumb luck" as well, except for not "give me a chance" either.

For some reason, it could still be Matter Creation, when it rather could be Creation myth, and next perhaps no such thing as coexistence either,
in that it next could be peace forever, and always the perfect world.

Reminds me of the melody "We are the Champions", next by musical band Queen, and that it should not be any mushroom either.

Still both Order versus Chaos, except not any "Ordnung must sein" either,
or

Lost the meaning here, and next too tired to edit as well.

Getting back at it.

When we sometimes speak of Credibility, we also could make it "Credible science", if not any evidence, for such a thing.

Translates into "glorification" here, and perhaps not any science either.

But here rather both an outcast or expelled, if not any "ostracized" or shunned either, or perhaps ejected.

Guess what, but making it both psalms or verses, if not any hymns either, perhaps not such a thing as "Formal Logic" either.

We could perhaps believe that Creation itself could be about possible Logic, by next also making it "Proof", or Formal Proof, for such a thing.

But next, rather that of Philosophy for such a thing, and next also Existence as well, and also "Existence of God".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theism

Next. speaking of Laws, next also written Laws for such.

Yes, indulge is perhaps not about any enlightenment either, but why question a possible Creator itself, when it also could be about Creation myth, for at least that of science?

Still thinking of gravity, and next also universal for such a thing, except for not any multiverses, or possible Wormholes either.

But next. "smack" as well, because you know that I was skeptical to the whole thing, at least when being here a while.

Here perhaps "Welcome to the club", next also because of a possible preference, except for not any membership either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictaphone

Except not any "prune" either for such a thing, because it could rather be about a "Dictator".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measles

Here apparently a recurrent decease.

For this, also both allegiance and obedience for two similar things. except for not the girl of two years, who became crushed between a couple of glasses.

RIP

For one thing, soften your tone a bit, except for not making it any simpler either, when it rather should be hard, or even harsh.

It still could be about the "Humble stance", if not any gentle touch either, but next also a given push forward.

So, perhaps reading this somewhere, except for not any answer either, for that of a possible push, or "initiative" of sorts.

Never mind, but right now I do not know where this idea came from, and needs checking,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamentalism

Not reading it all here, but at least Karl Marxx passing by, when next scrolling down the first link above.

Need getting back at this, because here at least a postulate for that of also an Axiom.

Yes, yes, yes, define levels of Intellligence, if you will and next also Yuri Gagarin for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yuri_Gagarin

Here perhaps still that of Formal Proof, if not any Axioms either, and next also the silly idiot for perhaps thinking that we are not alone in space.

Make it rather perhaps rather Copenhagen interpretation, and next also Logic for such a thing.

If rather about possible "Fallacies" again, next that a couple of things could be "deemed" to be true as well.

If or when making it such a thing as Fallacies, next also about possible Contradictions as well, because perhaps never should also mean ever,
except for not any story being told either.

For this, also a story being told, except for not any "Cliffhanger" either, because here about Logic versus possible Methodology.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serene

Key in serene, rather than serenity, and next watch the difference for yourself.

Obvious, and next also clear and clean as well, except for not hiding or lurking in the shadows either, for that of a possible disguise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivity

If still that of net neutrality, also that of Objectivity as well, and next also for a given purpose.

But here that also the big hammer of sorts, could next also mean a similar purpose, and next also "Reason" as well.

Should it next be easy making it both the Hammer and Feather, when it next also should be that of Creation being concerned?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural

. . .

Personally, I like the latter one better.

Oops, but next perhaps still that of Theism, except for not any citizens of Earth either.

"In the beginning"...

In the beginning, God created both the Earth and the Heavens.

Next he should be the possible Creator, for getting such a thing working.

If perhaps making it both "Deities" here or above, and next also that of Theism, which perhaps is more important?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morph

But next also an open hand as well, except for not any go, or go for it either.

We could still be scientists at times, and next also questioning nature as well, but also that the article about "Supernatural" above, did catch catch,
and next also fancy me as well.

So, still the words of a Prophet here, when next making it allegiance, when it rather should be about obedience.

Charles Darwin could perhaps make it "fit for a given purpose", but next what about possible allegiance, or possible obedience?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

Perhaps wrong for that of obedience above, but should at least be about allegiance.

Here like the picture of Socrates at the bottom, except for not any weighted, for possible Libra, either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Induce

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inducement_(disambiguation)

Here not checked yet, but perhaps does not beat that above.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homer

Rather keying in Homer.

It still could be the cake, if perhaps not any birthday cake, for that of a celebration,
but here perhaps rather Logic itself on its best.

Making it perhaps rather Logic, and next "Does God exist", and next the answer back, of course not, and next about possible Infallabilities.

If rather "questioning God", perhaps a bit better, because next about Logic itself.

Here perhaps still about the broken pencil for such and next also similarly wrong, if not any "utterly" wrong either.

Make it rather peace except for not any war, and also that silence could be broken by a similar havoc, and next also that of possible science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trust

Here a bit of hanging page at 4 AM in the morning, and took a couple of minutes getting at.

Yes, for Gods sake, if not any Christ either, but next make it at least Morality, if not any question about Religion either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo

Except for that, not any Discus either, for that of a flat piece of metal which could be thrown into the air.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal

You know, we could at least make it a compound, if not any metallic for such either, except for not any "Satanic verses" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrase

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology

Again a bit of slow response in the early morning here.

But if rather saint, versus possible sacred, or even "holiness",

because here directly from my mouth, yes, yes, yes, and next for one thing, slogan should also mean slant.

assert

advocate

espouse

teach for

Next, losing up and also forfeit.

In the same way as also lover could mean a possible mistress, also that of a mistrial when next it could be a contempt for court.

Back up, it also translates into "advocate" for that of a spoken word, or perhaps translation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbiotic_binary

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

Still that of "stars and stripes" for that of a possible elite, except for not "What did you say", except for not actually saying either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threading_(manufacturing)#Thread_milling

Keying in "thread mill" here, for that of possible manufacturing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbo

Here a bit of nice again, and I will return back at this later.

Being still a scientist, and next that also a fallback could mean a possible drop-down, if not any drawback either.

I still could be in for the idea that a possible smile could next make for a possible drawback as well, but next questioning possible science, also the similar idiot.

Here "forfeit", and also like this word, except for not meaning any much.

But if next also "silent", also "El Silencio" as well, for at least keeping your mouth shut, except for perhaps not any science either.

You know, women could still be coming with a couple of breasts, except for not any chewing either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertigo

Why still such a thing as "adhere" when it also could be about possible adherence?

Yes, facts, when it rather should be about a couple of given facts, when it rather could be about fiction.

If rather making it "saucers", or perhaps even "flying saucers", next a bit of "Truth". except for not making it any Norms. or even Fallacies either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred

Yes, yes, yes, exept for not any counterfeit, or perhaps any science sells either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

Guess what it means for the whole thing, namely the spoken word itself, and next perhaps also God himself in charge.

You know that it is perhaps on the "To do list", but next what do I perhaps do, for what I am perhaps could be doing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodosius_I

Yes, strike luck in perhaps a similar vain, for at least keying in "Theod..." for that of no vain, or possible luck.

Suggestions welcome, but right now I do not have it here.

But rather it gets at me that perhaps a blimp, rather a dunk, should be the possible explanation here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blimp

Time to get drunk perhaps, except for not any oversimplification, or even scarcity, about nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplicity

Or perhaps even that of manifold, for that of also possible magnitude.

We all know that perhaps "kick your ass" or the like, should not mean any mouth being shot either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selection

Yes, perhaps biased here, and next also conquer for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root

Root, or roots, and next also "Kunta Kinte" as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolution

So, what is meant by being above the Law, by at least abiding to such a thing?

Doctrine

tenet

Guess what, but it all could be possibly feasible, at least from the point of Logic itself.

Grmph, but next speaking of God, is this perhaps any more feasible?

Yes, yes, yes, but speaking of, perhaps Theology for next that of Religion as well.

Except for not any worshipping either, and next attending church.

Attemd. and next also attend church, except for not any attendance either.

Or perhaps it rather should be about the spoken word, because it next could be about Christian philosophy?

Hmmm.

On your mark, because next you perhaps could do it,

Or perhaps it rather should be the marksman here, rather than the silly fool who could be about the possible craft.

Again, slipping my mind here, for what I possibly could have to say.

But in the laws of weight, also that of weightnessless as well, except for not any sacrifice either.

Here, a tax exempt could mean a possible exemption, if perhaps not any "Bingo" either, for such a thing.

Make it rather a loss, and also an envy for such a thing, if not any perdition either.

Here feit itself next translates into a possible counterfeit as well, but if rather next feeling a sense of guilt, for that of possible innocence, guess that I still could be guilty.

Or perhaps it rather could be the threadmill here, because it also could be the Laws of natue, and next perhaps who or whom to possibly decide.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aggression

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statue_of_Liberty

Freedom of expression.

Next Buh!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_movement

Again, another buh, if perhaps not any sigh either.

Here, speaking on, except for perhaps not any behalf either.

Agree, except for perhaps not any

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isophorone or aldehyde either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aldehyde

Yes, perhaps a moment of trust for such a thing, exccept for not any silence either.

The Brit, or perhaps Brits. could perhaps be making it "Fastening your seatbebelts", except for not anything coming loose either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commissioner

Should it rather be that of a sancturary here, because it also could be a possible disguise?

Yes, we spell it both sit, sat. sat, for next gettin into the fridge, for that of the possile smell itself, including food.

When you next know it, or perhaps not, here the mouse for that of the cursor, flipping through, and entering the floor much of its own.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-crgQGdpZR0

Next perhaps not such thing as any absolutes either.

Perhaps it rather should be about the bass, except for perhpaps something still missing.

Here also pausing a video clip for that of landslides as well, and next also questioning if there could be something in between.
which I perhaps forgot.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape

OK, or perhaps anyway, but perhaps an elephant never forgets either.

Be an elephant hunter and next also a trophy of sorts as well, ecxcept for not any Oscar either, which at least could need a globe of fingers, or perhaps a fingerjack(?),
in order to be recognized.

At least watching, or noticing, if not perhaps recognizing the picture here, and next never say never either, because perhaps no such thing.

Getting back at it.

Or perhaps posting right here on the spot, for perhaps the intended meaning.
ID: 1923256 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1923258 - Posted: 8 Mar 2018, 7:17:40 UTC
Last modified: 8 Mar 2018, 7:20:41 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausible_deniability

Hmm, never say never and next perhaps ask me for such a thing as possible science.

Here my bad, if not possibly "Indeed" for such, because next also perhaps science as well.

Or perhaps looking into the night, for at least such a thing.

You never know.

Getting back at it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physiology

Edit: Namely that above.
ID: 1923258 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 2898
Credit: 1,968,922
RAC: 171
Message 1924037 - Posted: 11 Mar 2018, 20:40:53 UTC
Last modified: 11 Mar 2018, 20:55:49 UTC

https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2018/3/10/17104188/melodysheep-time-lapse-universe-earth-formation-watch

Needs reloading the page for that of whereabouts, except for not other selections which might be available.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naFixl954Ck

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79LciHWV4Qs

Perhaps a video in between, or before, but you need to click the left or right arrow here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

I think you could be quite close to the point here, except for not still make it "Little Green Men" for a couple of things, or perhaps rather a couple of things flying around.

We could still live in an unpredictable world and next think that science could well be predictable.

So, while the Big Bang was perhaps the big explosion happening, and next in an already existing space for that of the big, empty room,

I think we always could make it a discussion about ourselves with respect to the Universe, both for how clever we perhaps are, and also how close or familar we could get at it
for that of a subject being concerned.

I do not think that all of this are just planes either, but from here to perhaps the handshake of sorts, for that of making it someone else in person, perhaps still quite a leap.

Skip to some 35:09 in the second video above and following, also this being watched before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra

I think it broke a little here about a week ago, when this came to me, but checking only now, for that of also a bit of silly story from the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra_(disambiguation)

Here the initial start of the original story for this, which perhaps is not the correct one.

Like also similar or equal to a couple of things also mentioned, this could always be a hoax, if not even a story without any meaning, but after a number of years here,
I rather could find this to be a bit of hot stuff, for that of what it could appear to be.

Here the man eventually turns around after the brief encounter, and while the alien rather touches his forehead, rather than a given handshake for such a thing,
also lifting both his hands in successive order, perhaps one slightly more than the other.

In the same way as light is perhaps not any Matter, also that the sun could be still shining, but also that here are apparently physical things for that of also objects.

For one thing we could be still left with the International Space Station, for that of a conquest of space, except for also the possible fact that we could be having company,
and next could also end up in the same way, for that of also becoming part of space.

Look at science, and also that of given knowledge versus possible flaws when it comes to certain facts.

Among these, that of "Missing Link", which could also be about human ancestry, for that of our past on Earth.

Either we are catching up right now, or the aliens know that we are doing so for that of technology being at our disposal, making such a thing possible.

For one thing, perhaps still an interpretation of nature, by means of science, in next thinking that space for that of the Universe could still be both Matter and Energy,
except for gravity, of course, and next also the notion of time, which could be making a couple of things possible.

For this you could also put life itself within such a framework, by next making it "Tempus flight" for a couple of things, and also making it that of life and death as well.

Except for that, energy could still be about radiation, but for that of the living, it could also be more like the Aura, for a field which could be surrounding such life.

While "Healing" could still be a Miracle, rather than possible Medicine itself, technology could be a means of bringing nature closer to home,
except for not making it any products of nature either, for what we perhaps could see.

Either perhaps a solution being chosen, among others, or perhaps rather only one part of a whole thing, which could be telling about the way nature could be working.

If still an unexplained phenomenon, also with respect to ourselves, except for as mentioned, that we perhaps are catching up right now.

The first video is perhaps a bit stunning for that of its contents, but also that the second could also be making it Mathematics, for a bit of abstracts.

Therefore, both Mathematics and Physics here, except for perhaps not anything else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoeba

Perhaps both clean water and also air for a couple of things, except for not any life itself, but here perhaps where it all started on Earth.

Make it rather apes, or perhaps chimpanzees, except for not any dolphins or whales, and life could already be quite developed, as a result of evolution.

But next, at least for now, perhaps not making it any reference with any gods for that above either, at least for now.

Perhaps post here, in order not to lose it all, except for continuing as well, in due or respective order.
ID: 1924037 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 · 110 · 111 . . . 141 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2018 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.