Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 · 110 · 111 . . . 332 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1924037 - Posted: 11 Mar 2018, 20:40:53 UTC
Last modified: 11 Mar 2018, 20:55:49 UTC

https://www.theverge.com/platform/amp/2018/3/10/17104188/melodysheep-time-lapse-universe-earth-formation-watch

Needs reloading the page for that of whereabouts, except for not other selections which might be available.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=naFixl954Ck

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79LciHWV4Qs

Perhaps a video in between, or before, but you need to click the left or right arrow here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

I think you could be quite close to the point here, except for not still make it "Little Green Men" for a couple of things, or perhaps rather a couple of things flying around.

We could still live in an unpredictable world and next think that science could well be predictable.

So, while the Big Bang was perhaps the big explosion happening, and next in an already existing space for that of the big, empty room,

I think we always could make it a discussion about ourselves with respect to the Universe, both for how clever we perhaps are, and also how close or familar we could get at it
for that of a subject being concerned.

I do not think that all of this are just planes either, but from here to perhaps the handshake of sorts, for that of making it someone else in person, perhaps still quite a leap.

Skip to some 35:09 in the second video above and following, also this being watched before.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra

I think it broke a little here about a week ago, when this came to me, but checking only now, for that of also a bit of silly story from the past.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleopatra_(disambiguation)

Here the initial start of the original story for this, which perhaps is not the correct one.

Like also similar or equal to a couple of things also mentioned, this could always be a hoax, if not even a story without any meaning, but after a number of years here,
I rather could find this to be a bit of hot stuff, for that of what it could appear to be.

Here the man eventually turns around after the brief encounter, and while the alien rather touches his forehead, rather than a given handshake for such a thing,
also lifting both his hands in successive order, perhaps one slightly more than the other.

In the same way as light is perhaps not any Matter, also that the sun could be still shining, but also that here are apparently physical things for that of also objects.

For one thing we could be still left with the International Space Station, for that of a conquest of space, except for also the possible fact that we could be having company,
and next could also end up in the same way, for that of also becoming part of space.

Look at science, and also that of given knowledge versus possible flaws when it comes to certain facts.

Among these, that of "Missing Link", which could also be about human ancestry, for that of our past on Earth.

Either we are catching up right now, or the aliens know that we are doing so for that of technology being at our disposal, making such a thing possible.

For one thing, perhaps still an interpretation of nature, by means of science, in next thinking that space for that of the Universe could still be both Matter and Energy,
except for gravity, of course, and next also the notion of time, which could be making a couple of things possible.

For this you could also put life itself within such a framework, by next making it "Tempus flight" for a couple of things, and also making it that of life and death as well.

Except for that, energy could still be about radiation, but for that of the living, it could also be more like the Aura, for a field which could be surrounding such life.

While "Healing" could still be a Miracle, rather than possible Medicine itself, technology could be a means of bringing nature closer to home,
except for not making it any products of nature either, for what we perhaps could see.

Either perhaps a solution being chosen, among others, or perhaps rather only one part of a whole thing, which could be telling about the way nature could be working.

If still an unexplained phenomenon, also with respect to ourselves, except for as mentioned, that we perhaps are catching up right now.

The first video is perhaps a bit stunning for that of its contents, but also that the second could also be making it Mathematics, for a bit of abstracts.

Therefore, both Mathematics and Physics here, except for perhaps not anything else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoeba

Perhaps both clean water and also air for a couple of things, except for not any life itself, but here perhaps where it all started on Earth.

Make it rather apes, or perhaps chimpanzees, except for not any dolphins or whales, and life could already be quite developed, as a result of evolution.

But next, at least for now, perhaps not making it any reference with any gods for that above either, at least for now.

Perhaps post here, in order not to lose it all, except for continuing as well, in due or respective order.
ID: 1924037 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925166 - Posted: 18 Mar 2018, 14:42:43 UTC
Last modified: 18 Mar 2018, 14:52:38 UTC

Here we go again.

Once again suffering the big crash here, and after an extensive recovery, right now back surfing using the regular network interface,
after first installing Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bits, from the CD-ROM.

Again, should read DVD for this when needed, but except for the broken parts and pieces making things a little more hard, also quite a bit of hardware and software available,
but needs a bit of looking around, because of a bit of mess as usual, except for most of the older things in their respective places when not needed for this type of maintenance.

Quite a bit of detail when doing so, and also a couple of new things as well.

Got across the installation DVD for the motherboard, which had become lost, and needs checking if I got it all included,
because of the quite large amount of software on the disk, making for almost an hour and a couple of restarts.

I had to create a new partition using a 2 TB older disk, and the other things will have to be sorted out later.

The topmost internal SATA connector for the disks also took a dive here as well, and this is a hardware development problem that only sorted out halfway in
the first attempt, and needs more before getting in good shape.

More space between the single data connector at the top, and all the SATA connectors should next be equal in shape,
meaning that the topmost should be like the three others below, because here the angled connector is needed towards the disks.

Apparently both the Realtek HD Audio Manager became installed, and also Norton Internet Security 2011 as well, next shortened a bit for its name.

For this still only the needed setup in order to connect to the web, and also installing Google Chrome as the default browser.

Because of that, I have not tested the graphics cards yet for that of CUDA, or even dowloaded BOINC Manager, but either on a separate disk,
or I will have to check in with the download server for this.

Like the other similar systems box, also failing on the topmost SATA connector, also the big box being purchased, where I could have a PC/Workstation motherboard,
but here the mentioned snag for that of the screw, which was part of the box itself, but came up with the motherboard at the bottom, when redoing the whole thing.

Also a couple of short plastic connectors coming with the box as well, but for some reason it has been tightened to the box using hardened plastic,
and will need a scissor to get removed.

If necessary, I could have the server motherboard removed from the box it has been placed into, but regardless, the mentioned beeps being heard, could be from missing
external units, rather than an internal USB connector which got bent by my fingers.

I still experience the undervolt problem, but only readily visible from the desktop when having the software application running as well.

Except for that, the computer could well turn off without any warning.

I could get the other things sorted out as well, but again that only three physical disks could make it slightly more diifficult.

Finally, also that this takes a toll on the body as well, in that it became a bit of sitting on the floor during two days of recovery,
and next having it all back into the computer room once again.

As long as having this problem, I could choose sitting in front of the TV all day, and next only with a cup and small dish on the table,
or I could try continue in this way, making for a bit of shambles when it comes to things around, and the way they could be handled.

Finally could add that the network interface got quite up at speed here, so because of that, could keep a tab on things happening right now.

Better continue with the rest right now and have BOINC Manager and the rest of the stuff downloaded as well.

Back later.
ID: 1925166 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925195 - Posted: 18 Mar 2018, 17:33:59 UTC
Last modified: 18 Mar 2018, 17:55:49 UTC

Anyway, I had one cup of coffee a short while ago, while also adding a bit of powder chocolate as well.

The fridge is not working well, and therefore a bit of mess in the kitchen.

So next perhaps the thing being noticed about a RAC (or Recent Average Credit) at only 30, for my part.

Should I blame a bit of near-sightedness, or even stubborn hands for this, or rather the fact that tiredness could once again settle in,
for that of picking another beer from the fridge?

If perhaps so, blame such such a thing on the scientific part, if you will, if any such should exist or be present at all.

For one thing we could still be having a scientific debate, except for also missing a couple of bits and pieces here as well,
because of the recent loss of a great physicist, who also happened to be a scientist.

Either back on my heels for recent events of my own, except for perhaps not looking around, or otherwise keep a tab on regular subjects.

But if not wrong, if it perhaps should be an obituary of sorts, also that we know that there still could be a difference between the Theory of Gravity (both)
and next with the similar lack of such, which rather becomes a wild guess, or even shot in the dark, for that of Quantum mechanics,
as the most important, or perhaps fundamental question.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

This where it ended before it took a dive, and meant to post this as well, because here also Fluids, and Fluid Dynamics also gets my attention.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_dynamics

Again that it could be two eyes for that of seeing, except not any ball lightning either, where it only should be the regular lightning.

Except for that, only the Method of Proof as well, for that of proving a couple of things, including perhaps the "Man in the Street" as well, for a couple of things,
except for those things which ended up in a locked drawer, or perhaps safe, for that of its contents.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manhattan_Project

Perhaps it all started up here, for that of possible sillyness coming with that of mankind, or humankind, for that of making a possible difference between the axe of the
Stone Age man, and next the tools which could be used in order to conquer space.

The fact is that I could make it only the physical world for a couple of things, and next quite often also working versus not working as well.

For this, you do not always assume given Laws, or even Equations for such a thing, including that of sitting on a floor using your butt,
but also that staring into the Universe, either using a book, or perhaps the lens itself, next also brings pieces of unknown closer at home as well.

My own inpression is that visual light from both stars and distant galaxies, are not there only because of millions of years passing away.

The speed of light, c, is perhaps still the limiting factor for a couple of things, but like looking in vain for possible life close to a bluish star (not blue itself),
we probably strived a bit without no success, except for such a thing as sky-map.org, which could be telling about our minuscule size compared with a
couple of other things. and next our insignificance as well.

But next that the Force of gravity could be universal when it comes to that of space itself, and still we rather could make it the Universe for this.

I could perhaps tell about the place where I was born, except for not knowing it myself, but should there next be any secret around,
when it comes to that of a personal mind?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellect

For this, also that of both sleep, if not any dreams either, which next also could lack a possible conclusion for its interpretation, or possible meaning.

Here perhaps that of a name for next that of a place, except for not any history books either.

But rather that it could be the forest for a couple of things, and you could be using a flashlight with a red, or even infrared bulb,
except for not the one which could illuminate the landscape using perhaps green color instead.

Needs checking for that above, but exept for the little special flashlight in my living room, next also that of Strobe light for much of the similar.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strobe_light

But except for that, perhaps still best wishes, and next also a happy marriage as well, except for not any luck which could strike between your fingers,
or even that of sorrow and misery which could come by means of a misery day, and a bit of illness or sickness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measles

Perhaps not lethal when treated in a better way, but except for that, always a good reason for having no reason at all, and next also
"For Christ's sake", when life could be in balance, or you could be walking the thin edge.

We perhaps could still have a scientific debate, for perhaps that of science itself, except for not any criss-cross either,
which next could be the difference between a constellation in the celestial sky, and that of the cross which could be worn along your neck.

Make it still both winners and losers as usual, except for not any gold, silver, or bronze either, for that of a pedestal, but you probably know that it became the word for that of symbolism,
which next could also be a swastika, or the like, but rather could be about the thing hiding in the shadows, or perhaps even lurking, and next pretending to be something else.

The lizard (or Lacerta) is a small constellation above Pegasus in the celestial sky, and a possible alternative here could be the Chamaleon, or even the Mantis.

Lost the word for this, but mentioned earlier.

But here it becomes wrong when thinking that it perhaps could be a fake thing for this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa

Guess you could see the smile here, except for not making it the Man in the Moon either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

Here two quite nice articles, by the way, for that of the pictures coming along at the top.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Here translates into Axiom for both postulate and postulation, when keyed in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothesis

You probably have to be redirected for that of making it a bit of Philosophy instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato

Again that we probably should agree that the idiot versus the genius could be explained, if not any differentiated,
by next making it Formal Logic for such a thing, and also that true should be the opposite of false, next for a story which could also be told.

But if still only counting, why the difference between 1, 2, 3... and 1+2+3... for next also making it a manifold, and also that of quantifying an issue?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_(mathematics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perception

The important thing here is that you always could make it right for that of wrong here, but if perhaps right, next not wrong either,
for that of a state of mind which perhaps could be a dream, and next also wrong.

Make it rather Logic, and it could still be about right versus wrong, except for that both could be part of life, and at least happening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poetry

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prose

So perhaps still God save the Queen, except for not having any mercy either, because we could still believe in the elementary particles of space,
and next also the universal Laws for everything, which we could next make also Equations, and also be telling about our whereabouts, except for not any
false statements which could be still about Logic, and next also make for a difference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

Next not any bad move either, except for the different spellings, or pronunciations of this word.

If rather bid, also "What are you bidding, my Master", except for perhaps the Emperor here, rather than God itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_and_concrete

Again, should not make it three links in a row.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_universe

The latter for that of the "Biggest blunder of my life (Einstein)", which still needs a satisfactory answer or explanation.

Compare with the current discussion, if not any news, for that of Dark Matter versus Dark Energy, and you perhaps know better.

But next, "Tell me", if not "Tell me a story" either, in that it perhaps should be understood that the Universe could be understood by means of Physics,
and next by means of appended Mathematics for such a thing as well.

If green is still a color, next blue as well, and we also could make it a silly, or even stupid idiot for the Man in the Street, and next what he also saw.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol

Forget the stray dog this time, because except for a handshake, we also could make it both Order and Chaos, and next that at least one thing should come from another.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

I already said or mentioned it, namely dismiss nature for a couple of things, and next also this project on the shelf as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph-Louis_Lagrange

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagrangian_point

Better have him mentioned this time, since I previously forgot to mention it.

But still also mind-boggling as well, in that ideas could be put into place for that of both fashion, and next also ordinary work.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis

Again you perhaps know my own interpretation of a given subject, perhaps differing slightly,
but next perhaps the question where Philosophy could relate with the question of both Theology and Religion,
except for not making it any Existence either, and next also Existence of God.

Here both the index and also appendix, if not any summary either, of a given chapter, in that we could make it at least Matter Creation for that of the Universe,
except for perhaps such a thing as Existence, at least for ourselves.

Here perhaps a bit of two-fold, or even three-fold for such a thing, in that we could be having ourselves as humans, next also the Universe itself,
and also that of Credo as well, which could be a "Belief" in that of God, for that of also his Existence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myth

Why not still counting instead, for that of possible intelligent civilizations which could be around?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amoeba

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilobite

Here perhaps not the story of Adam and Eve either, but rather about life on Earth itself, and next also its development by means of evolution, in a similar way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heaven_and_Hell

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constraint

Next the opposite should be possibiliies, but still rather that of counting, except for not any quantisizing either.

Beware the wolf, but I could be speaking for humans, if not humankind either, when next making a couple of thoughts about the Universe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology

As I mentioned before, "Tell me a lie", next rather should be that of telling the truth instead, for that of its possible validity.

We usually make it common sense for a couple of things, except for not making it any Norms either.

Drive a car on red light, or even park forgetting the ticket needed for the payment, and next it becomes a misdemeanor,

But if rather making it "Love from God", when it could be about possible hatred, next you should also know this story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_model

We still could make it "Another brick in the wall", for at least a melody, but next that one piece of a puzzle always is supposed to belong in a particular place,
and not somwhere else, also for that of a particular subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alpha_Centauri

Here, quite important, except for not Proxima Centauri itself, which is a red dwarf star, but next that the physical "A" component here, is almost like the sun itself,
while the other "B" component, except for not Proxima, is a slightly cooler, or colder K type main sequence star.

Next, twist your fingers a little, and attend church, for that of the Bible which could be held in your hand, and telling about where it all started.

Here a possible idea, but needs a bit of thinking first.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord%27s_Prayer

Here still the piece of cake for such a thing, except for not any bite in the sour apple either, for that of making it the snake in the Garden of Eden,
and next a couple of temptations.

Always a difference between "please" (perhaps misspelled) and also "Snake Plissken" for such a thing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Framed_Roger_Rabbit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

Better make it two links in a row.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy

Again the little line in between.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics

Perhaps suffiicient for only that above, except for not such a thing as Statistics either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mortality_rate

For one thing perhaps sufficient to say, if not any suffice either, but next also "Give me a laugh" as well, except for not the Janus face, or even Stairways to Heaven for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poker

But next roll the dice as usual and pretend to be a scientist, except for perhaps not a bad day at work either, for that of your job.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probability

When next assuming, you also could be making a couple of assumptions as well.

Here, ruminate, muse, or ponder, except for not any pondering either, and also the figure also showing such a thing, next for that of also "Master Mind",
for perhaps that of a game.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastermind

My bad perhaps, but is perhaps a difference the same as making a possible "differentiation"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crucifixion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resurrection

Here perhaps still the Janus face for the first link, in that it could be a fake, or perhaps a bit of pretending, for that of also symbolism,
but not so for the second link.

Again, lost the fine word I came across for this, but posted before.

As an example, you could make it a Prism for next also the rainbow, but except for not the yellow sun in the evening, you are not supposed to walk into the sunset either,
where it rather could be a red sun, for that of such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condition

Only watch the celestial sky under favorable conditions, except for not that of death itself, only because it could be possible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tract

Again, only rough or approximate here, but suppose you want to pour a liter of water into a small glass or tube, at least having a narrowing opening,
like a throat, and next your stomach below.

"Ready, steady, cook", and next we should know about the timeglass, except for not any suck for that of "suckers" either,
in that I could pretend to be a scientist, and also make it Black Holes as well.

No secret that we should know about at least three things here, and next both "Hawking radiation", Chandrasekhar limit, and also the Event Horizon, comes to mind.

We still could be having both the stupid idiot, except for not any Formalism either, which at least could be making it Concepts as well, and also a notion about objects in the sky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event_horizon

But if rather Arm wrestling, also "beat me" as well, because I still could be making it science itself, or perhaps on its own, for what it could perhaps also tell.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_equation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_field_theory

But rather "Duck, take cover, because it next could be a silly thing, also part of history itself, and next also a couple of lessons being learnt.

Perhaps something is still missing for that of possible "Belief"?

Getting back at it before it gets too late.
ID: 1925195 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925222 - Posted: 18 Mar 2018, 20:04:59 UTC
Last modified: 18 Mar 2018, 20:15:25 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

I still could have the beer, of course, if not making it a setup for next also a trap being possible.

But if rather making it a condition for life, or rather a "prerequisite", you could be back at Axioms for such a thing,
except for not making it any Formalism, or even Formal Logic either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Still one thing for another perhaps, but next what is one thing supposed to "prove"?

Should we perhaps still believe in a better world, except for not any cleverness, which could next make a difference between the fool and the genius?

Here keying in "Pretend" in the Wikipedia, but not satisfied with the result.

But rather make it both the square and the circle for this, except for not any polygon either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika

Here a bit of surprise when also using Google Translate as well, because here directly on the spot for this thing.

Compare with that of death itself, and next "one thing for another" for what it is supposed to be, or meant to be.

Make it cruelty. and also a Dictator for such a thing, except for perhaps not any name either.

Keying in "Faceless coward" next, and also a bit of disappointment, for that of no answer back in return.

Sing a song, or perhaps even think a little, and next even science could sometimes be worthless for what it is supposed to be.

Should the Bible still be the source, or should I rather make it to YouTube here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrifice

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

Never say never, or perhaps not tell either, because this could still be science.

"Bitter and twisted". . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormwood

But rather that science still could sell, and next we also could make it a better world.

Because of that, or for this, one thing of a bit of concern, is that of making it science versus one thing, or the other, except for not science itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

So next, out of the blue, only because the sky could be blue, except for not any dark either, for at least that of color.

Black could still be a color, like white, but except for not any collar either, for at least your smoking,
you rather could choose to make it a grave, for next also digging such a grave, and next also a funeral as well.

Except for not any smoking either, because as mentioned, science supposedly sells for what it perhaps mean, and next also is supposed to be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature

If perhaps rather making it nature itself for such a thing, we also could make it the living thing as well, except for not any "Death of Kiev" either, or the similar.

Be left to choose, and it still could be about Probability, except for not any digging of a grave either, which could be for another reason, except for not an obvious choice either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_selection

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inheritance

Next perhaps not any whistleblower either, for also making it a pipe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fortune-telling

Yes, except for not any fortune telling either.

Except for still the "Biggest blunder of my life", also that we could make it "bullsh?t" and also "fu?? off ???hole, or the similar, except for not coming or making to any conclusion at all.

Please do not forget that this still is supposed to be a scientific debate of sorts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creator

If still rather a deity for such a thing, also that it should be in the page as well.

Should a difference, or perhaps making a difference, be about enumeration, or should it rather be about Logic?

Or perhaps it rather should be about "Belief" itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief

Here compare with that of both Concept, and also Conceptual reality, mentioned earlier, for a possible similarity.

The general rule of thumb is that if you are asking for it, next you also could get it as well, including a bullet through your head, and also a speedy death.

But next that a similarity should also be making for two or more things similar, or equal, to each other, and not be telling about any difference either,
which could be about that of differentiation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schizophrenia

Here a mental disorder, or perhaps illness on the mind, when humans are being concerned.

Anyway, we still could make it Dreamland, of course, except for not any love story either, or even the fact that science sells at times.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneumonia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy

Did I perhaps make it Concepts before, and also a link for such as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept

Compare with Abstracts as well, or perhaps Abstract versus Concrete in a similar way, and next that science still perhaps sells,
except for not any Formalism which could make a difference between the "Man in the Street" for the stupid idiot he also could be.

Always that of charity, except for not any nonprofit either, for that of science still sells, but if still making it both circles and squares here, also that of ellipses and ovals as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_ship

Have a nice week, or perhaps weekend, except for what I said.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Adamski

But next that "We choose to go to the Moon", except for not making it any bluff either.

If also mentioning that keying in "Faceless coward" also made for a bit of misere, or misery, in a similar way, also for that of a possible shortcoming as well.
at least when it comes to the Wikipedia.

Like Formalism itself, also that a subject should be better formulated for that of its meaning, except for not becoming any ambiguity either.

The oath of faithfulness...

Or perhaps rather allegiance here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegiance

Beware the wolf, but should I still believe the "Man in the street" here, except for not any counting either, which could be about possible intelligent civilizations in space?

Easy perhaps, except for not any hard either, for at least that of going to the Moon.

A harsh reality of real life is not supposed to be any dream either, and your perhaps know that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Christian_Science_Monitor

But next not about Barack Obama here either, but rather a belief, and next a possible belief beyond the church, and next its capabilities, for what it may possibly be able to offer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity

Here perhaps the cross for such, except for no swastika either, so what is the difference here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolution

Perhaps no need to mention any Methodology either, but rather that of "Credo" for next that of possible "Belief".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodology

For one thing, still that of science versus Religion itself, and the possible difference (literally), except for not both thinking and also believing,
and next also making it both Existence, and also Existence of God.

If not mentioned before, always the difference between good and bad, except for not making it any hatred itself, but rather the snake or worm ending up with a possible broken back,
and next that it perhaps did not deserve that.

Yes, Norms a little down in the previous post, and of course I forgot mentioning Morality in all of this.

Lack of, and you could have the penis, and also disgusting as well, and next also the remaining part of the discussion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satan

Guess what, but we are not supposed to see the bull's eye, even here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality

Make it rather Morality, and also Morality in Islam as well, except for not any bullsh?t either, which could be another story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morality_in_Islam

Again (The) oath of faithfulness here, and not finding any relevant article here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotheism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tawhid

Translates into Monotheism in Islam in a similar way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catheter

Here wrong word or wording again, because here thinking about the priest in the church, and next the table he could use for that of placing the Bible,
when next giving a speech.

Perhaps it rather should be about a pedestal here.

But next perhaps agree that science could be telling about much or more, except for not any little or less either.

Here next that of gravity as universal Force of nature, except for not making it any life either, including all its possibilities.

Guess what, but the winning ticket in perhaps a lottery, could still make you a dead man the next day as well, only by means of pure chance,
except for not any luck either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity

I already mentioned that of "Either/Or", or perhaps "Neither/Nor", at least for my part, and next that science is perhaps not only about pure chance either.

"Prove" Little Green Men for that of such, and next that science could also prove it to be wrong.

Perhaps no reason to blame me for such a thing either, except for counting as usual, and next the number of intelligent civilizations across or throughout the Universe.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fata_Morgana

So, if perhaps not an astronomer of sorts, or perhaps per se, what is next the answer here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time

Yes, tick tick...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wormhole

Again, a concept not proven, at least not as yet.

But next, that at least E=mc2 ...

Here, or for this, the question of whether time travel is possible, and next if it could be put into a context of its own, or perhaps belong to other things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reference_frame

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_reference

You know, but time is not only a notion, but also time itself passing by, next becoming old, like also the turtle as well.

Slow speed, except for, or perhaps not any high speed, and perhaps not the Autobahn for this either.

Here rather an atomic clock being placed aboard a plane, for that of a journey across the globe of the Earth, and next the small difference,
when compared with a standalone, or motionless clock, unable to make a journey, or trip, on its own.

Always that of broad science versus any notabene, or NB!, but here at least still the clock for such, and next that it also should be motionless.

Make it a travel, and next across the globe, except for not any space travel either.

Time as a notion itself, makes the Universe some four dimensional, and next in nature, for that of its "inherent" properties.

But next the sad fact that ageing could still be a process only, and, next affect at least humans, except for not life as a whole.

Sometimes both a start and stop button, except for not any rollercoaster either, and a wish to get off the ride, before it gets too late.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ageing

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifestyle

Yes, Fatman for this as well (and perhaps not needed).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laurel_and_Hardy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Farse

The second or latter link as perhaps a general subject here.

Make it still rather death here, and next perhaps not any excuse either, because there should be no such.

For this, blame Probability of course, except for not any Morality either.

Make it still the fireman, and he could be climbing the ladder, in order to extinguish a fire.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-down_and_bottom-up_design

Perhaps still a notion of time, if you will, except for not any Satanic Verses either, or even a man having the name of David Koresh for such a thing.

The fact is that we could still make it the Bible for such a thing, except for not any Sins either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin

So, where does it start or stop, or perhaps lack thereof, for that of possible "Belief", and next also Existence, and also Excistence of God?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism

Here only adds to the whole subject, except for not making it any Creator as such either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirituality

Should I add Creator here as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creator_deity

I already mentioned Monotheism as that of a spiritual belief.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deity

Or rather a mental practise of sorts, if you have the time, or rather do not bother.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoga

Back tomorrow.
ID: 1925222 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925307 - Posted: 19 Mar 2018, 8:02:56 UTC
Last modified: 19 Mar 2018, 8:40:07 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=82702#1924529

Perhaps working better after the dinner and next cake.

The funny thing is that I check in with Number crunching each time I return to the session, and this time rather a discussion about possible science.

Either it is from a point of view, or given stance, but at some occasions you could choose to make it numbers only, and other times more that of your pet animal for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_C._Clarke

Only for reference here, and I leave it for others to write the obituary, but a classic television series on Discovery in past time, was having a reference to a frame being visible,
which could perhaps illustrate the notion of infinity, but rather by means of someone else, which next could relate to some given intelligence.

I am still a bit concerned, or perhaps thinking of the fact that nature could still be a "dead end" of sorts, in that intelligence could only be found or present here on Earth,
while we otherwise have that of lifeless space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_analysis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risk_management

Like disk, also analysis together with corresponding management.

But rather perhaps a "stumbling block" of sorts, if no possible answer is given, and here thinking about the words of Einstein for the "biggest blunder of my life".

But next that we also chose to go to the Moon as well, for the sake of science, and not because of any wishful thinking about a nature still having a couple of secrets.

For this, perhaps either a misconception, or only that for given words, but except for any Credo, which could mean possible Religion, we could make it a different subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural

Here perhaps a bit related to the Paranormal for the subject, but for practical purposes, I could leave that of Religion out of the question, and only make it possible science.

We still could be having both AND, OR, and NOT as logical arguments, except for not any silly thoughts either, which could be that of such thinking,
but rather that switching a fuse does not necessarily make any change or difference when science is concerned, leaving one thing completely out.

Perhaps not totally correct, but the Pauli exclusion principle also makes me think about that of mutual exclusion among plants and animals, in the hands of Charles Darwin.

Needs checking here, because this needs a better way of writing.

Therefore, while having dinner served in a restaurant, I could be choosing between steak and beef, except for not leaving with an empty stomach,
only because I could choose to say No.

Or perhaps salmon instead of beef here.

My guess is that nature could always be showing its face towards us, by means of its appearance, and for this both space, and also that of Matter,
which becomes that of elementary particles for such a thing.

Here the small thud or bang behind the curtains in my room, and next snow coming down outside, except for not any big gusts of wind either.

A bit strange, but perhaps a bird passing by.

Musical artist Vangelis is having an album, where among others, the melody Message, is being found.

But for now not having the title of the album itself.

Next two faces besides each other, both facing forward, towards the viewer, and here it also becomes that of a possible interface.

One of the words or phrases being used by my father is that of the world having or containing, or really rooming, a couple of things not found other places.

Becomes the word "manifest" popping up right now, which translates into "Manifestation", among other things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation_of_God

And supposedly it once again becomes a discussion of God for that of the possible divine once again, in that it could also be about deities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epiphany

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophany

But is perhaps one thing that of being godforsaken, or could it rather be that you could be lost at sea for that of your soul, and next either a lack of finding yourself,
for that of a missing soul which could also be present.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvation

Here still not making it any "Harry versus Sally" either, but rather that hidden parts of the world, next could also become that of science, and we could choose to make it
the Paranormal, or even superstition at times, when it rather could be that of "Faith".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith

One thing is perhaps still "choosing to go to the Moon", for that of a selection only, but rather that it also could be that of "Option Base" as well,
because here among other things, also leaving a couple of things out for another, in order for making a preferred choice.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_exclusion

Not up to the task yet, so please have me excused.

But here rather making it Monotheism for that, or the way of a possible "Belief", if perhaps not any Faith either, only because it could still be the church left to decide,
and not any science either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotheism

But next still an astronomer of sorts when it comes to myself, and next does it matter when it comes to my personal attitude for a couple of things?

Ask the question about what is the correct interpretation of nature, and next the answer should still be that of science for such a thing.

I previously mentioned that I looked up "Faceless coward" using the Wikipedia, and like at least one other word, did not find the answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy

Either it becomes that of YouTube for a couple of things, or it could be that of being biased, for that of both Culture and also Politics itself,
which could make for that of an inclination, or perhaps attitude, among ordinary people.

[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale[/url]

For a Type III civilization (if any) it reads as follows,

A civilization in possession of energy on the scale of its own galaxy, with energy consumption at ≈4×1044 erg/sec. Lemarchand stated this as a civilization with access to the power comparable to the
luminosity of the entire Milky Way galaxy, about 4×10^44 erg/sec (4×10^37 watts).


You know, if it could still be about a Type III civilization here, next also the "Faceless coward" as well, in that humans at least could be coming with a face,
but next that nature could be indifferent for its possible behavior, or attitude.

Perhaps not any hermit, or recluse for that of Robinson Crusoe either, but rather that it could be a loner for such a thing, and next also solitary, or solitude,
for a similar way of living.

Sing a song, and next make a dance around as well, except for not any hidden disguise which could be hiding, or lurking in the shadows, pretending to be something else.
only for that of a possible hidden world.

This only because nature could also be such a thing, and we could choose to believe versus not believe, only because it also could be about the Method of Proof.

Should I still try, if not possibly even dare, for that of making an interpretation, or perhaps understanding of God, by means of a concept,
except for not making it any "principle" either?

Always an interpretation of nature by next making it science, it seems, but next perhaps not "in the hands of God" either, for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Querulant

Here only the rough translation, but next also a bad experience in life as well, when coming across such a one.

Perhaps not only about craze, mania, or maniac here, but rather also a way of obsession, except for not a way of verbal expression, or perhaps even behavior as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Strangelove

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

Like both fission and fusion, also a way of thinking, except for not carry out a couple of things either, for next making it that of real.

Always the choice or selection between nature and that of Comic satire, it seems, except for still making it nature for one thing, and satire for the other,
only because it could be still fission versus fusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comedy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody

And not forgetting Satire either, because still Charles Chaplin for such a thing, or at the helm, except for not any big laugh either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire

Making it still either/or her for that of a couple of things, and next it also goes to show that Cosmology still could be about nature,
but that you next could be left to include, or incorporate one thing into another, and not the opposite way, or vice versa.

Here perhaps another way of stating this as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiction

"The oath of faithfulness"

Here the other word which I did not find any result for when looking it up.

Except for a curse, swear next makes it "Dammit" or Damn it, or even "Darnit", or "Darn it", for a couple of things, except for not any Allegiance either.

Here the possible translation problem, or way of spelling a word correctly, but as usual, I could give a bit of thought about making it perhaps still science,
when it rather could be about a given wording. phrase, or expression, except for not any Allegiance, or perhaps fidelity either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegiance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_and_concrete

Next a bit of Philosophy as well, for that of a given way of thinking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art

Here perhaps that of Art not the most important subject, because I mentioned Mona Lisa earlier, except for not any Rembrandt either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mona_Lisa

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_da_Vinci

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set

But rather that it still could be finite versus infinite, and next back at the start of this message or post, because here only before 9 AM in the morning,
and I was thinking of having another beer, before looking at the Mandelbrot set again.

This because we could still make it science for at least nature with respect to itself, except for perhaps nothing else either,
which could become a different, or perhaps another subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_speech

Next it reads "Thank God for miners", a little down the page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expression

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phrase

But here perhaps not any similar wording either, or even a phrase.

But here still that of a "Mutual exclusion principle" only, because it could be about science, except for not making a choice between a similar science,
and next that of Religion itself, which possibly could be about "Existence" as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agent

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerve_agent

The section In science and technology, next In biology, chemistry and weaponry, for the latter link above.

Except for not any Agent software, also that Sarin could be a highly toxic substance and also a Nerve agent as well, if not wrong.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarin

This only because it could be toxic, or a toxic substance.

We still could make it the "good, bad and ugly", of course, except for not any notion of "Heaven and Hell" either, which could next tell,
or make the difference between "Love from God", and next the weapons of war, which at least could mean Hell on Earth, if not any Heaven either.

Did I mention the possible fact that both Matter Creation, and also Creation myth, could be about possible science for both, except for not any true or real facts
about a possible Creator himself, for that of the Universee, at least?

But rather that it became the "heavy hand" for such, because when making a notion of both Heaven and Hell, also a way of Belief as well, which next could also be Faith.

"In the beginning . . ."

In the beginning, God created the Universe, and next saw that it was good.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Beginning

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instantiation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Genesis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_narrative

Except for perhaps still Creation myth itself for that of science, is this because scientists and Theologists still chooses to disagree on a couple of subjects,
regardless of it being perhaps science only, or even that of a similar, or perhaps different Creation narrative?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_prophecy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

Read around, and here it becomes a mentioning of God a couple of places, except for not making it any science either,
but still perhaps rather Religion for the whole subject.

If not wrong, President Bush (the younger), was the one coming up with the phrase or expression "Faceless coward", only because it could be about terrorism,
and not any science at all.

Therefore still both "Freedom of Expression", like also the market itself, in that science could still sell, if not supposedly doing so already.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marketing

If next also Marketing, also about a given brand as well, and I could be losing track of the subject which should be at hand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theism

Count the inner moons of planet Saturn, and next Janus, Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, and so on.

Next forget about Janus, because this moon perhaps does not exist at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Being

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deity

Here the first article is perhaps better than the second, in my opinion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction

Still perhaps that of the climate as the subject, except for not making it any Prophecy either, for that of a subject field which is better explained in the article itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis

Not to be confused with Theism here, because I checked in with this, and here two different articles, and because of that, perhaps not relevant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History

Given the fact that I could still be an astronomer of sorts, next also that of questioning nature itself with respect to the Universe,
when it rather could be the inverse, or even that of Cosmology as the whole.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmology

Honestly, but next rather life itself, except for not any Life expectancy, because it could be at least Life on Earth,
and not any life around elswhere, because at least we could know about our own insignificance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_expectancy

Here that of the ladder again for the fireman, except for not the little figure climbing to the top of the seven spheres, and next looking into the unknown.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ostrich

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimpanzee

For all of these, except for perhaps the Ostrich with its head in the sand, that of Intelligence as the most important thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence

And next you of course are supposed to compare with ourselves as humans, when it rather could be the "Thing", for perhaps the unknown, and next part of space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_from_Another_World

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Thing_(1982_film)

Always making it "That is what I was afraid of", for that of a couple of things, except for perhaps still a scientific debate, which could also be about aliens or extraterrestrials.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genre_fiction

But next also that of "New Horizons", which also could mean Pluto express, except for not the discoverer himself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clyde_Tombaugh

Next have me excused for not being a Mathematician or Physicst, because next it could be both Dark Matter and Dark Energy for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

While still perhaps a scientific debate for a couple of things, also that it could be better if scientists came together and grasped the fact that there could be still both different subjects,
and also different meanings, or interpretations for much the same.

As an example, Existence, or Existence of God, should not be the same as Creation myth, despite the fact that both could be part of the same "aspect", or perhaps scenario.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aspect

Next wondering if "Market Garden" could be available by means of YouTube, next for watching the whole movie.

Back later.
ID: 1925307 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925342 - Posted: 19 Mar 2018, 15:39:24 UTC
Last modified: 19 Mar 2018, 15:59:18 UTC

For some reason it becomes wrong here, or perhaps rather a difficult thing to say.

Question atheism as such, and next also agnosticism in in a similar way for at least telling about science.

If or when perhaps (still) a scientist, when I rather could be an astronomer of sorts.

Foretelling next translates into Prediction, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction

I mentioned at Mersenneforum that of "giving a laugh for a couple of things", except for not making any such laugh either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=djV11Xbc914

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science

And not about the Scientific Method here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death

Here keying in decease, and next it becomes that of death.

What wrong thing next to say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea

-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syphilis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measles

-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tradition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism

Alter ego, eh.

Edit: Clicking the Return or carriage return here, and next it becomes that of a preview of a given post.

Perhaps still OK, but a submit for that of a submission of a post should only be by means of a button here, and not any carriage return.

Next that of a world view of sorts, for perhaps that of science in progress.

Edit: The url label is visible in the previous post, because of making the quote itself.

My guess is that it became a double here for this.

Anyone having the privilege is welcome to fix.

Also adding the little notch (^) for both here, but next only one showing up.
ID: 1925342 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925365 - Posted: 19 Mar 2018, 17:48:06 UTC

ID: 1925365 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925472 - Posted: 20 Mar 2018, 8:56:52 UTC
Last modified: 20 Mar 2018, 9:00:19 UTC

Should perhaps add to the previous, if not already doing so, but here a bad thing being experienced,
namely that the plastic cover for the main carriage return button on the keyboard came loose in its cover, leaving the key not responding.

Could hit the Enter button on the numerical keypad at the right, which is independent of the NumLock button, but definitely more tedious, so until finding a solution,
I am out of here for now.

For plastic, only the superglue should work, and not that for paper or stamps.

Back later.
ID: 1925472 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925496 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 2:16:14 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 2:18:14 UTC

Again the little could versus should here, for that of a difference.

Even single words could bit too long at times, making for a long sentence, if not line.

I still do have the original Intel 8086 Handbook standing in my shelf, totally coming apart, but here not too much for that of numerical instructions,
possibly, x87, or the like, which I otherwise could interpret as a transform.

If you wish, you may visit YouTube and try look up "Sound of Music" there, only for that of Seti@home instead, meaning Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence,
but like reading a newspaper, you probably should know its possible importance.

My guess is that most people still think that intelligence comes with some two eyes, and next also a face showing up, but rather that making a difference between Logic,
or at least "Proof", we also could be doing so, by interpreting numbers which could be part of nature itself.

This could be part reason when we could be left believing in ourselves for our inability not only interpreting a couple of numbers for their possible meaning,
but also for both their validity, or at least significance, if needed.

As mentioned before, intelligence could always be a "measure", in that some people could be dumb, while others intelligent, and also that we are descending from the apes.

My guess is that you still could make it "toast" for that of a drink, except for not such a thing that intelligence could always have been around since the Dawn of the morning,
but rather that it could have been meant for another purpose.

For perhaps another day, or moment, we could also make it a discussion of angels as well, for that of the possible divine.

If perhaps cutting that above short, rather that it could be still intelligence around, at least on Earth, and that intelligence could also be defined.

If both silly, stupid and dumb, like also a genius as well could be still about a measure, also that of a scale which could be making it certain levels of intelligence as well.

Or perhaps rather different levels instead, because of both the Kardashev scale for this, and also the word "threshold" coming my way.

Except of course still making it "Sounds for Seti", or perhaps reading a newspaper.
ID: 1925496 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925508 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 3:34:53 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 4:02:47 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genius

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought

And only because of the header at the top of the web page for my national broadcaster, except for "such a sad thing", when next also writing it down,
because here perhaps it became the thing we forgot or missed.

If still both bronze, silver and gold for that of a medal, and next also pedestal, perhaps no secret for that of intelligence itself, except for that of both levels and also thresholds,
which could be making it a difference between that of intelligence, next also conscience as well, except for not any angels either, for that of the possible divine.

Like ITER, for the biggest nuclear fusion project being undertaken, also words about a supercomputer being developed in Japan, which may not be finished until 2025,
or perhaps even 2035, for all its details.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITER

Give me a laugh, but could we still make it (Microsoft) "Anna" for that of a synthetic voice, which perhaps is not about any speech recognition either, and next also make it intelligence?

If not wrong, intelligence could be the subject in question here, and next also an important one as well, but are we still flat on the ground, or perhaps on our heels, for what it perhaps could be?

Read my postings at both Mersenneforum.org and also PrimeGrid as well (ask someone there if needed), for that of numerical analysis, and perhaps not the same as any "toast" either,
because making it perhaps both angels and the possible divine, it still becomes a Religious question, when we rather could make it both levels and also thresholds for such a thing,
meaning intelligence.

Compare with the Ostrich, with its head in the sand, if not any else, and next also humans as well, and we should be having at least a starting point for that of possible thinking.

Next, "you dare" for that of going the opposite way, namely upward for that of climbing, because as usual you could be falling down most of the time,
except for not making it any "Stairways to Heaven" for that of possible Belief.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind

Initially not making it any Conscience here, because of Rhytm, for that of a musical dance and also similarity between words, but also the possible trapdoor which could exist,
when perhaps making it something being any else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythm

For this the second link above.

Also not a finishing line break at the end of the buffer when editing the post.
ID: 1925508 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925516 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 4:13:24 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 5:04:29 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science

From the link about Mind in the previous and I had to scroll or rewind back a little between tabs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind

I do not read it all, but scroll down to the section "Scope" a little down, and read what it says.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment

Here just in the door for that of the page above and I better should read before doing any more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

Yes, I know where it goes, and next leave it for you.

Here "Meaning of everything" at first, and it becomes the second, because here also that of "Survival of the fittest", or perhaps "Stepwise refinement",
when next making it also Evolution.

Forget about Einstein here, for his "Biggest blunder of my life".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-down_and_bottom-up_design

Here two blue screens in a row and for that I am a bit late.

But next that perhaps "Evolutionary path" could make it sound like better.
ID: 1925516 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925525 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 5:43:09 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 5:44:20 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdisciplinarity

Again, a bit of problems here and I hate this.

But rather that I find it tempting to use it in a different context, in the same way as both Mastermind, and also Shipping, could be a game.

To be more specific, my guess is that the Pope is not sitting in a wheelchair, when out greeting the masses, but perhaps still so at times when it comes to possible science.

Making a choice and it also could be about a selection, except for not any Grand Tour either, which could be that of exploring the solar system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything

If Theory of everything next should be about everything, what is next the "opposite", except for making any similarity between Logic and Truth?

Here I could be left with "One thing for another", only because it could be science, and next either perhaps not defined, or it could end up just Theology.

You next could make it into a GUT as well, except for perhaps any Thought or Mind for a possible Methodology needed as well.

Guess you should know what we are doing here, at least most of the part of it, but if not wrong, even "New Horizons" should not be any "Journey to the end of the Universe",
for at least our imagination, and possibly a couple of ideas.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fashion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Style

Next both fashion and style, except for not any rhytm or rime either, in that we still could make it a scientific debate, only because it could be about nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life

Are we next back at a Method only, or could it rather be that of Belief itself, only because it still could be a Religous issue, rather than a scientific one?

If you happen to be having Faith, you also could be a believer, but is such a thing supposed to benefit, or be of value when it comes to any science?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognition

If you do not mind, a story is not always a fake story either for its possible details, or what it may tell, but if not mentioned,
such a thing as "Empirical evidence" could be a tool which could be used to support a possible "claim", which next could become fact, because of a similar "Proof".

When next becoming such a Proof, only because it could be that of a claim, it reminds me about Projects and Project Management, if perhaps nothing else.

This makes me think about both interfaces and borderlines, where different parts of science perhaps meet up with something else, which could be that of Religion,
if not any "Thoughts" either.

Is the reason for this that we are only looking at ourselves for this, or the fact that "<--" is not the same as "-->", or even "<-->"?

My guess is that science could be broad at times, but also could become a sharp angle as well for its details, but next that neither Faith or Belief are the same for its details,
or at least "specification".

Intelligence, in the same way, could be about thinking, while Conscience could also be about dreams and hallucinations, if not anything else.

For each of both we do have the Scientific Method, and therefore could make it science as well, except for still the borderline, or lack of interface.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_von_D%C3%A4niken

Finishing here right now for that of his merits and leaving it for you next to both think and read.
ID: 1925525 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925527 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 5:46:49 UTC

Religous or religious?

Suggestions welcome.
ID: 1925527 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925544 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 10:13:40 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 10:27:56 UTC

To whom it may concern.

Not, I believe, correct.


This was the answer I got, and unfortunately I do not catch it here.

I am watching the oral or perhaps verbal question time in National Parliament right now, where questions are being asked on the spot,
and also answers back in the same way.

Not the same as here, of course.

You know, one month off from 15 years here at Seti@home and I do not necessarily run blind all the time, except for cleaning up a bit in here.

For this, good, better, best, and next the question how good we are with respect to nature.

I am giving a little thought about whether it should still be science, or perhaps it should be something else, only because for one thing it could be about a
possible inclination, and next also an interpretation of a couple of things, which interestingly could also mean "Thought".

If not wrong, or perhaps stupid, and still reading the mind of some others, perhaps that of betterment of BOINC should speak for itself,
but except for falling a bit short once again, always that of "respect with others", next in a more common sense, because there always could be different
interpretations of the meaning of humankind versus other things which could be possible.

Should it be technology only at best, only because it could be a wingless bird, or even headless as well, or should I rather make it still silly for the
whole thing when it rather could be only a stupid thing to say?

My guess is that neither Moral or Norms is about any Conscience for what it perhaps is meant to be, but if perhaps so, is both Theology and Religion an issue,
or issues which are readily explained or acknowledged for that of subject only, or is it because perhaps Conscience is still poorly defined?

There could perhaps be a general interest in a couple of subjects at hand here, but do we need to discuss any technology issues,
only to have it thrown down the drain, or could it still be about "betterment"?

Among other things we could be having here, is an energy debate as well, because it could be about both nations, as well as people.

We also could have energy in nature as well, but perhaps not the silly or stupid fool like both you and me, who could next pretend to be scientists.

Guess I could be angry, but only because I am sitting here, knowing that we perhaps may not be alone in space.
ID: 1925544 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925547 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 10:34:09 UTC

But also two eyes, two ears, one nose and also a mouth for that of yourself, and next you also could be looking yourself in the mirror for pretty much the same.

Not meant for Wiggo this time either.
ID: 1925547 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925554 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 11:49:07 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 12:14:12 UTC

Or perhaps that of both winners and also losers.

Make it rather a political debate instead, and it also could be about Politics itself.

You know, there is also such a thing as "Devil's advocate" for such a thing, except for not any WMD either.

If perhaps not different spellings either, also that sir Winston Churchill perhaps was not any scientist either, but rather a puppy much like a couple of others.

Therefore you also could politisize a debate as well for what it should be, except for not making it any wars or conflicts for much the same.

If perhaps still that of WMD, what are we supposed to be afraid of?

We could perhaps still think of ourselves as humans, and not any chicken, for that of at least living things, but depending on perspective,
we could also make it "basic constituents" for at least our way of life.

Except for not sitting on a bomb, or even falling out of a plane on top of such a bomb, I find it a bit strange that we do not look at a couple of things by making it a perhaps
three part issue, where matter, energy, and also gravity, are the individual constituents.

Fear could be a common thing, if not factor, except for sometimes not being afraid either.

You sometimes could choose to make an invasion of another country, and next "bomb away" as well.

Like a cause itself, next also "Just Cause" as well, for that of invading Panama, for that of a military intervention into a foreign country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Because I am not into Politics myself, but rather both numbers and science, I am next also a bit "crooked" at times,
I perhaps could find a reason to be amused at times, if not doing so with myself.

A couple of years ago, I made it that of "When atheists laugh at Religion", except for not remembering the contents here.

It should be told, or perhaps noted, that I always could make science for what it is or should be, in that atheists, and also agnostics, are not supposed to dream,
but rather sleep, and in this way not be thinking about any Heaven.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_disorder

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion

The first my problem right now, the other for that of making it still only nature.

For one thing it could be about both eyesight, and also hindsight, which I perhaps do not have anymore for the first, and next also could be about retrospect for the second.

For this we could also be making it a scientific debate as well, without any need to politisize, except for still a couple of important questions at hand.

My guess is that sometimes it could be about subjects for that of also issues, and next also that of tools as well, which also could be at our disposal.

You could be the one choosing to make the world "as is".

I tend to be choosing a different solution for that of thinking, only because of myself, and not with respect to any others, whoever they might be.

So it goes, at least in this world.
ID: 1925554 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925555 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 12:08:59 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 12:09:22 UTC

To be more specific, my guess is that the Pope is not sitting in a wheelchair, when out greeting the masses, but perhaps still so at times when it comes to possible science.


This what I came to write, or perhaps wrote, and it was not the intended meaning.

My apologies here.
ID: 1925555 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925569 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 13:04:14 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 13:11:08 UTC

Perhaps my last one for now, but here also the debate in the National Parliament here.

Shh, but the one in charge there (and not the Speaker), perhaps is getting it slightly wrong.

And next not any nitty-picky either, for that of a towel being used on a street, but rather about a subject a bit more important.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3shmfKOZ9g

Here the first video at the top, when you only make it the three first letters.

Guess what, but we even have a national state for such a thing in the United States, except for not a city, or capitol either,
but except for the rooster riding the horse at times, we also could be making it at least Governance both here and there, if not anywhere,
except for not such a thing as "Populism" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

If not wrong, at least Hillary was asked to go, but not because she was any President, but rather only a Politician and next because it became the Senate for such a thing,

Here we rather could be making it a Constitutional Monarchy for such a thing, and also a King among its people, and not riding any horse,
it still could be about Governance at times, because it also is needed.

Perhaps meant to say Democracy above.

Make it both Anarchy, Fundamentalism, Fascism and also Marxism, and we should know where each should go, or perhaps belong.

Is it not the fact that the President could be waving at times, only because it could be about its people?

Watch the video for yourself, and also you may see Governance in action as well, and next being carried out.

Except for not fumbling with the chocolate and biscuits still lying on the table following the dinner.
ID: 1925569 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925576 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 13:48:49 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 13:56:08 UTC

Should intelligence be still about nature, or could it rather be about ourselves as at least human beings?

No reason to hate both you and me and also science, but it could still be about hatred itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hatred

Guess what, but I could happen to see nature in action here.

So, therefore not about any Creation here, or even Moral and Norms either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy

The reason why a couple of things could happen should be that of Anarchies, or the similar, but also that you could have a bit of Governance as well.

Is Governance next a wrong thing, only because you could be having free societies instead, and next you could live in peace with another,
and not making it any wars or conflicts of sorts.

For this you could make it that of equality because it could still be that of friendship, and not any hostilty, because it still could be about Democracies.

If Governance is perhaps still needed, from where or which hand should it come?

Terrorism should be about order, and not any disorder, and therefore still a need for both Governance and jurisdiction.

Compare with the ant for such a thing, where it is supposed to be an ordered society, when it rather could be about Anarchy.

But next that a Democracy will always suffer in the hands of at least Dictators, if not making it any proud one such either.

Why this difference, when it still could be about only nature for such a thing, and also that we are part of such nature?

The atom could still be an indivisible particle by means of its name, but it does not tell about the way in which societies should work and also behave.

Make it some five senses for that of ourselves, and next also feelings, if not sometimes envy as well, and also competition at work,
for that of craftmanship and effort.

Either we are meaningless or nothing in the big picture, or hatred could be the one thing which could be surpassing even gravity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilization

Here a look back in the past for such a thing, except for perhaps making it the future when it also could be something else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future

Here for once I want to read myself, because here it became new.
ID: 1925576 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1925590 - Posted: 21 Mar 2018, 15:39:30 UTC
Last modified: 21 Mar 2018, 16:30:59 UTC

Nitty-gritty...

Or perhaps water above my head for a bit of knowledge.

You should know that the subject of UFO's right now is not the hot subject among most people, but when it comes to myself,
it becomes the difference between clean water and Mercury as at least substances, if not any elements.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(element)

But next water as a substance only, and Mercury as a Periodic Element.

Make it Credible Evidence, and it also could become Credible sources as well.

I do not find any reason to doubt facts regardless of whether it should be any evidence or not.

Next that seeing a UFO flying in the air is not the same as any handshake, or greeting with an alien or extraterrestrial.

If perhaps both a told story, and next also true, next with regards to who or whom for such, in that it could be both ourselves, and next also others as well,
which we could interpret as possible aliens or extraterrestrials, except for still making it only a natural phenomenon.

Sitting in a chair in a playgarden and next up and down with only the seat and only ropes (lacking the translation), should not be the same as any hangover either
from a couple of drinks, and next I do not have to be drunk all the time either.

There is a famous photograph around, showing objects both dark and white, possibly illuminated, which could be giving evidence that we are not alone.

Because of both a possible joyride at times, and also being drunk as well, also such a thing as both up and down as well, and here I was thinking about Contact for such a thing,
in that we could be lacking a protocol for such, and it next could be us to blame for such.

If perhaps still a difference between ourselves and next others, should it be nature to blame, or should we rather blame ourselves?

We could choose to make ourselves into a particular context for only our way of life, except for not any Mercury which could be used for a thermometer,
or even pouring acid in a drink, or perhaps the head of someone, only to make it a sour thing.

Most phenomena in nature could be explained by means of Physics, and also Mathematics as well.

Make it nature also for ourselves, for that of a possible living, and next you also push the Laws of nature on our way of life as well.

Here I lost the little better way of saying it, or perhaps expressing my thoughts.

Make it rather water being poured in acid, and it is either illegal, if not any invalid, but could still be possible.

Make it rather the lift for up a floor or two, and next also that of intelligence versus conscience for that of a state of mind,
in that you also could be making it different levels of intelligence, and next also that of conscience as well.

Light should still be light, except for any darkness, because of illumination which also could be present.

Technology should be for a given purpose, and next also a given way of living for that of life itself.

But next that of a hero's welcome from that of a mission to the Moon, and next not any sorrow being felt, but only happiness and joy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stroboscope

Here for that of the dentist, if not any flashlight either which could be used.

Happy day, but you know that I left the show for that of possible belief, and next became something else.

Rather than the mentioned fact about both countless stars and galaxies, I am more concerned of the fact that it could be ourselves next for that of others in space,
and for all of this also the meaning of it all.

I agree that Belief in itself is perhaps not a tool on its own for that of making it science, but next should this be only about ourselves, or rather what we could be looking for?

Superstition should be about lack of Belief, and not having any such, only because it also could be about the possible divine.

Now getting a bit tired, and perhaps time for bed.

Edit: politicise should be the correct word.
ID: 1925590 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 · 110 · 111 . . . 332 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.