Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 103 · 104 · 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 . . . 332 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1916761 - Posted: 3 Feb 2018, 23:46:09 UTC
Last modified: 3 Feb 2018, 23:47:14 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herpes_simplex

Next, mea culpa as well, for that of a couple of words.

Make it rather Google, and it also could be googol as well, if not any googolplex either, for that of any numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googolplex

Also that it could be a bit funny as well, particularly if you had a good day past you.

Now I am off.
ID: 1916761 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1916793 - Posted: 4 Feb 2018, 2:36:35 UTC
Last modified: 4 Feb 2018, 2:42:35 UTC

Listen, I checked and betreger chose to make it "oh" at least three or four times here.

Next I thought it was for me as well, except for not myself thinking in such a way either.

Compare different users and it next could also be not only about credit, but also "stand" for that of possible attitude.

Make it his 16 + million credits, and at least a bit of respect, except for perhaps not any attitude either, including for that of both project itself,
and also other users here as well.

A user at PrimeGrid chooses to make it "Respect" for that of a couple of things, and next also "with respect" for my way of also choosing at times.

Make it a secret for a couple of things, and next also that of secrecy, except for not making any personal politeness, or unpoliteness either, which rather could be about
insensibility, if not any Confidentiality either.

Here Secret or less for that of a military clearance, and also Confidential or the like for that of those things which could be sometimes sensitive as well.

Should it next be a difference between any buh, or bah here, except for not any oh either, for that of given expression?

Or should it rather be about a naming scheme, in that we perhaps could be making one thing for another, by at least guessing that it could be so?

Any suggestions, or perhaps answers welcome.
ID: 1916793 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1916862 - Posted: 4 Feb 2018, 13:49:54 UTC
Last modified: 4 Feb 2018, 14:00:42 UTC

Sorry about being a little too harsh in my tone.

It was not a good thing to say.

Back with the 32 bits installation again, and noticing that it still will not install the Windows updates.

Launching BOINC Manager each time by clicking on the icon on the taskbar, it comes up with the installation question each time,
and here I suspect a possible Registry error.

It still works, but next that a shutdown and restart will not help either, as long as the setup is the current one.

One possible option is try uninstalling, and next installing again, if not trying out the repair option, because now the power supply got more stable.

Here meaning the computer at first, and next the Manager for the second.

Two Genefer16 tasks were finished up first, and here CUDA for both, except not part of the application name in the Manager at the right in the tab for the tasks.

Still becomes the second last column here for this, for that of Application at the top, rather than Name.

Therefore launching only one or two such tasks when it rather could have been one for the card, and next some two tasks for the processor as well.

The same should also go for Seti@home tasks as well, where some blc05 tasks could be CUDA based, while others could be meant for the CPU.

For these short Genefer15 and Genefer16 tasks, remaining (Est. or Estimate) could be much like or even for that of both CPU and CUDA tasks, making it difficult to spot the difference.

Therefore, the different assignments for that of CUDA versus CPU tasks should be listed or readily visible in the name of the application itself.

Disabling CUDA once more and restarting four blc CPU tasks for that of a closer look.

More later.
ID: 1916862 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1917765 - Posted: 9 Feb 2018, 0:30:45 UTC
Last modified: 9 Feb 2018, 0:51:39 UTC

If not wrong, you also could be having "Voices", by Vangelis, for a bit of more softer tone for that of speaking as well, if not any discussion.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=82459#1911171

Let us start here today, or at least for this session.

We all could perhaps agree that science should be the thing that should carry us on our way, and next for that of a greater understanding.

Lessons learned for at least a couple of times in life, for that of events happening, but also like both small and large, also events happening, and also those places you could be visiting,
could differ, if not vary, and not only because of seasonal variations either.

Mars could still be a desolate planet, but next also one with dust devils on the surface, if not any sandstorms covering the whole surface of the planet.

Make it rather a couple of other things, and next it could be both a reason to perhaps believe, if not making it any reasoning either, for that of perhaps questioning whether or not we could
be alone in space.

Make it a Court, both with a prosecutor, defender (sometimes also called a barrister or lawyer), a jury and so on, and not forgetting the judge as well,
at least in my country there could be a custom habit of doubting possible claims, if not any acts or deeds, and rather make it innocence for that of possible doubt.

On Mars we still do not find such a thing, and the question becomes next if something is perhaps lacking, and that life itself, at least on Earth, could be still unique,
or maybe that it rather should be viewed in the context of evolution as a whole.

Here also that science sometimes does not differentiate between fact and fiction, but rather could make it possible Proof, for that of also making it true as well.

If perhaps still "Credible evidence" for a couple of things, also that this way of making up a couple of things, if not believing either, could be that of the ufologists way of doing such a thing.

If perhaps also a story about the Universe which could be told, and next a different one than that of elementary particles, here perhaps a story being told as well, which science could next
embrace. and take to their hearts.

If perhaps so, why not any controversy either, for making it possible controversial in its possible facts, in that it also could be both speculation and hype?

Make it still one thing true, and the other false, and next perhaps both for a couple of things, but next that Jesus perhaps did not eat any sandwiches either, when making a dish for
a couple of people in the desert.

Should a story being told next be a chapter, and if so, perhaps a chapter coming from the Bible?

We sometimes could make it synonymous words by speaking about both Armageddon, if perhaps not the end of the Universe, by making it possible oblivion for that of its expansion.

Perhaps rather more about Prediction here, but next that it could be such a thing for that of the weather, if perhaps not any time travel either.

Make it still only Rodney Dangerfield for that of a comedian, and next also the danger zone as well for that of possible living, if not making it any laughter either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodney_Dangerfield

If perhaps rather "Top Gun", featuring Tom Cruise, also that of "Living in the Danger zone" as well, for that of possible flying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZzQ3eBerHfM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conclusion

Like throwing a stone on the surface of water, it could sometimes go on forever, by means of skipping.

Neil Armstrong could also be skipping on the surface of the Moon, if perhaps not jumping, but next that he was not the one being carried away either, for what he possibly could see.

Make it rather "cities" on the back side of the Moon, and next also in the hand of Skeptics as well, if not perhaps making it a debunking story of the whole thing either.

Supposedly science could always fit a given taste for whoever you perhaps are, but next you also could be welcome as well.

Should astronomers or astrophysicists still be the ones coming up with the definite answer to a couple of things, only because they could "know"?

The true fact here of the answer is that we should always be aware of the different facets of nature, rather than placing ourselves in a position where no definitive answers could be given.

Make it still possible "wrongdoing" for that of science, next that Robert Oppenheimer could end up a "scapegoat" for his possible thinking, but next that this is perhaps also unfair.

We could next also agree that neither worms or ants, if not any flies, could sometimes be whispering in your ear, and next also be telling a story about a secret world.

Make it rather still fear, and also that fear could be a common thing in the United States, except for perhaps not any threat either, in that it also could be such a thing for that of a
"Faceless coward".

You may have heard or perhaps seen the story about the news helicopter coming a bit close on events for that of WTC (or World Trade Center) and next ordered to move away.

Make it still a bit of fear, and next also such a thing for that of both terrorism, and terrorists as well, but next who gave that order to move away?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory

Perhaps mentioned before, except for not making any big story of it either.

But if rather making it still Religion for a couple of things, next that we also could believe in ourselves from such a point of view, except for rather thinking of ourselves as a product of nature.

Always a difference between sleep and sleepless, and next you start counting up sheep, in order for doing such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parapsychology

Make it still also Parapsychology, and next also a difference between walking a straight line high above the floor, except for not stepping on the platform, which next could be falling apart.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable

If rather choosing to write about possible nonsense, for at least doing so for that of the Bible versus science, next also that of a parable, for that of choosing a couple of words.

Always a difference between unambiguous and ambiguous, except for not also adding -ly at the end.

If for some reason this should still be "Throw away science" for a couple of things, next also that we could make it both "Credible evidence", at least for that of a subject,
except for perhaps not the "Man in the Moon" either.

Should it next be a difference for that of making it perhaps "Little Green Men" for that of a couple of things, and next also a couple of lights in the sky, for what we perhaps could see?

What about possible "comprehension" here, in that it could still be that of "WYSIWYG" for both eyes which could see, and next also tell, except for perhaps not the whole story either?

Look, the Universe could be some 13.8 or 13.9 billion years old, meaning that it could be having at least a radius of much the same, if perhaps not even more.

Next also some 500 billion galaxies, where each galaxy contains between 10 billion and some 100 or 200 billion individual stars, or suns.

Next, "Count on me" as usual, if not making it any melody either, but if the sun is still shining, next that it also could be still possible "Comprehension",
if perhaps not making it any Religion either.

We next choose to make it both Matter and Energy as well, and also choose to make it Materialism for that of a given way of living, for that of a couple of cars, and so on.

But next that "You sold, you bought", if not making it the Lord for such a thing either, and next also think that he could be your savior.

In space there are not only novae, or even supernovae, but also that of hypernovae as well, except for not any 's either.

For some reason we choose not to make these objects any decisive factors for that of affecting the environment here on Earth, including living conditions.

If still the weather, and next also the climate as well, if not any vice versa, except for perhaps not any elementary particles either, or at least about the Universe.

So, is Empirical evidence still only that of a possible wording, or should it rather be about the "Man in the Street", for a couple of things he could see?

If perhaps rather something else, we could be dealing with a subject which could be both intricate and diffuse and next also a fascinating subject as well.

For the first, ere still the naked body of a woman lying on a table, and next she is having a different head than perhaps ourselves.

Next, believe it, or perhaps not.

For the second, that of a possible Dyson sphere, which could next hide an intelligent civilization from its surroundings and never reveal itself for that of its complexity.

Next perhaps also a waste of time as well, for at least what I could be doing.

If perhaps still a question about both intelligence and also energy production, versus consumption, also that of Creation as a whole as well, in that a Type III, for that of a
possible civilization, could at least be ill defined.

If we still could make it myriads, if not any manifold, also that our history could be only one among many possibilities for that of such a thing.

MAD still could be that of "Mutual Assured Destruction", and for this we also should be knowing both our roots, and also where we once came from for that of our origin.

We still think that we evolved from the apes, but if looking at both aspects of the word as of today, and also that of a given past, it should be more logical at looking at ourselves from a
more universal, if not any Cosmological perspective, in that perhaps we descended from the stars of the Universe, and next made it the Earth for that of living.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmigration

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradise

Next my uncle still kicking up a bit of dirt and sand for that of making it pieces of earth, and next also soil, for that of a gravestone, and next with my father,

Only the digger as well, and the priest did not show up, and I also mentioned the fact as well.

Should we next make it possible Religion, rather than that of science, only because it could be lacking a possible explanation, or rather that we could be taking it for granted?

If perhaps not even more to this thing, I mentioned both the Aura in the past, and also that people could be having "Near death experiences".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-death_experience

Personally I do see the Aura past my fingers against a dark background, and not too difficult either.

Also I mentioned that there could be reason to believe that even Creation myth could be an enforced "will" by means of science, by means of at least making us believe.

Like I said before, Creation could be with a heavy hand, because it also could be "enforced", and next that Creation myth could still be side by side with that of Matter Creation,
but next that we could still be questioning that of a possible Creator in a similar context.

Here we choose to make it both the Aura, and also Near-death experiences as well, favorite, or favorable subjects.

Mind you, because of not any "esoteric" either for a couple of things, still a couple of "hookers" around for that of "in flesh and blood", except for not any happiness either.

Always the pill at breakfast, if not any lunchtime, and such a thing could be preventing any pregnancy, except for that of the last breath of your life, which next could signify death.

Should life be still sacred as it is, or should it rather be about "Heaven and Hell", because it could be both?

Ask me, and next I could perhaps believe that I could end up in Heaven when I next die.

Make it rather "Hangman" for at least a game, and next also both the innocent and the guilty, in that it always could be the butcher around.

If perhaps still Logic about a couple of things, also that of Fallacies and Infallabillities as well, except for not making it any possible Belief either, and next in that of God.

Here both a left eye and right eye for that of seeing, if not any watching, but next that the Devil could be a part of you, rather than the similar, which should be about God,
next as that of a savior.

We still could be having both stars in the celestial sky, if not any elementary particles either, but also that life could be synonymous with both a Force, and also will.

Make it still the Aura, and next also "Here I am", for at least that of music, in that I could possibly believe in both Heaven and Hell, except for not making it any science either.

Make it rather the Ten Commandments of the Bible, and next also that God gave a darn, or even dammit, by at least not bothering.

The only thing possible to say is that we could make it a difference between Matter Creation and Creation myth, for at least the face of God, and next what he could be telling us.

Make it both frescos on the walls of churches, if not any notion of Jesus Christ, and perhaps at least on the way for a couple of things, except for not any "truth" either.

To make it clear. we could have both fallacies and infallacies, for that of making it at least science, if perhaps not any God either.

Next that Creation myth should be a way of telling about possible Religion, if not any entrance gate for such a thing either.

As both an astronomer of sorts, and next also scientist as well, I could make it that of "conscience" as well, except for perhaps not any intelligence either.

Make it both Wormholes and also a couple of Multiverses as well, for that of a possible "assumption", if not any Belief either, and you next could be at least on your way for that of such Belief,
except for not making it happen either, for both yourself, and also your friends and companions.

But next, "Wind him up" as well, if not usual, and next take a story more or less for granted, if perhaps not any so either.

For some reason it both could end up in at least that of "W" for that of a letter, meaning Wormhole and possible Eternity.

Here perhaps a bit of "blunt" for that of speaking a language, but should I next be a priest and also be telling such a thing?

If you do not mind, Eternity could be kind of "Timeless fashion".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

Here for at least making you any silly or dumb, except for already mentioning the fact that I am not attending church myself.

Make it still "Forces of nature", and next also a bit of laughter as well, for what it possibly could mean or signify.

People choosing to be possible "believers" only, could next "swear" for that of a fact, except for not making it any science either.

If perhaps still the opposite, or something else. next also the big laugh as well, except for perhaps not making it the Aura either, for that of a possible Comprehension.

Here the famous equation E=mc2, and next silly me, and I could also think, or perhaps make it a "Stairways to Heaven" for such a thing as well, if not any "Portal" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

Correct me if I am wrong, but supposedly it should be still Matter Creation for one thing, and next also the notion of time as well.

Perhaps not readily visible or apparent, but I made this equation such a thing, namely that of interpreting it a "Stairways to Heaven", only because it could be the notion of time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle

Here dangit, it should still be about Matter Creation, if perhaps not any Religion either, for that of a possible subject.

If Religion could still be telling about both Heaven and Hell as the subject, and next an equation making it at least time as a notion, if not any Eternity either,
where next the possible difference?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

Keying in Logical Fallacy, or Fallacies, should still also go for the same here as well.

But here still that of nature for its possible beauty, and also that I could be having two hands, like also God as well, and next you could be welcome.

Here also the recap or summary of todays events, if not any "rap up" either, for that of a word I did not find, or come across.

Funny eh, but still that of Jesus hanging on the cross for that of a a crucifixion, except for you not believing either.

But next also Moses for that of at least the Old Testament, if not making it any Book of Genesis either.

Oh, so still perhaps a tell tale story for that of possible Creation here, next for such a thing which happened some 13.8 billion years ago.

Or is it rather that time could still be a "measure", by at least making it the Planck constant?

Make it rather a pulse score of some 0.95, and next also such a thing for that of work still in progress.
ID: 1917765 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1917804 - Posted: 9 Feb 2018, 3:25:47 UTC
Last modified: 9 Feb 2018, 3:32:00 UTC

Which one here (for that of a nuisance)?

Oh, remember the discussion . . .

If not making it that of any intelligent life and next also the "possibility" for such.

Sigh!
ID: 1917804 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1917810 - Posted: 9 Feb 2018, 4:18:31 UTC
Last modified: 9 Feb 2018, 4:20:45 UTC

Oops.

For some reason I forgot the discussion here and next it should be that of ourselves among the stars.

Next as an intelligent civiilization as well.

Ping (at least for that of given knowledge), excluding or perhaps including ourselves.
ID: 1917810 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1917841 - Posted: 9 Feb 2018, 7:14:07 UTC

or pehrpa maje ut any glittrt a well, then it rahrte ould be abitt teatds-

As is above.

v
ID: 1917841 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1917853 - Posted: 9 Feb 2018, 8:30:41 UTC
Last modified: 9 Feb 2018, 8:44:17 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzH0cR5HjZI

Here some 3:59 or so for that of some pretty music, or at least part so, which next became possibly retracted.

Or,

Deep in the motherlobe (Genesis).

Here only keying in for this, except for not being any slave of possible business either.

Needs checking, but here also the naming could be wrong as well.

Getting back at it.
ID: 1917853 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1917855 - Posted: 9 Feb 2018, 9:09:23 UTC
Last modified: 9 Feb 2018, 9:10:33 UTC

Or perhaps rather for this asked.

Hereby

gratioutios

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZnP6eq9kcM

In the meantime.
ID: 1917855 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1917856 - Posted: 9 Feb 2018, 9:15:06 UTC
Last modified: 9 Feb 2018, 9:17:14 UTC

Two months here from 15 years here, and next ask me such a thing.

Please.

Leave it for a couple of others to decide, and next a Conssensus as well, for that of a couple of tasks,
except for not any "stupid me" either.

So it goes, at least for a couple of tasks.
ID: 1917856 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1918762 - Posted: 14 Feb 2018, 8:46:17 UTC
Last modified: 14 Feb 2018, 8:54:04 UTC

Or perhaps it also could be written in the following way.

Neither a radio or radar operator is not supposed to be dealing with any UFO's either, or even any conspiracies either.

There might be a couple of scientists here pretending to be doing a good job of that of analyzing the data, but next also on behalf of the project itself.

Make it rather any skepticism, if not any hysteria either, and you could rather be making it both "Man in the street", if not any President either, for what he perhaps could see.

Next that science again could be generous at times, and thinking that it next or also could be so, except for perhaps not having all the details, or the complete story.

My guess is that we could still give nature a chance, while we also could have ourselves in mind as well, for that of our possible capabilities.

If truth should be around, or possibly out there, also that of Consensus which could be needed for those things, if not any results which could be returned.

Doubt such a thing as any Religion, but next do such a thing for that of science, and it still could end up in those things mentioned above, which next could also end up in that of a controversy.

Namely that we could be left to assume that we possibly may not be alone, but next also make it that of one thing or another, in order to also tell one different thing from another.

In my opinion, such a thing as Consensus should be about proving an intelligent signal coming from space, not necessarily that of lack of respect for both users and people,
if next favoring perhaps one one thing versus another.
ID: 1918762 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1918766 - Posted: 14 Feb 2018, 11:51:01 UTC
Last modified: 14 Feb 2018, 12:03:42 UTC

It should not have started with "Or" in the previous, but rather that if we make it Philosophy, rather than perhaps both astronomy and even ufology,
we could stray away and make it all about a discussion of God, rather than the subject which should be more at hand, namely that of aliens and extraterrestrials.

Perhaps no such thing here in the middle of the day, but rather it could happen in the middle of the night while asleep, or perhaps for that of making it sometimes valuable science,
when it also could be only pure nonsense.

Neither the Pyramids of Giza, or even such a thing as being a chemist in a laboratory, should be about a given notion which should be for that of a certain "belief",
but next also the possibility that time travel both back and forth, could be slightly more relevant for that of a subject.

In any way or case, nature is supposedly still the winner, and also that we could choose to make it only such a thing, when it rather could be something else.

While still that of diversity which could be found, also that such a thing also could make no difference between neither winners or losers, or even that of been left hanging on the cross.

Astronomy could still be one of the oldest sciences, if not the oldest, but also that we could choose to make it "Man in the Moon" for a couple of things, when it rather could be something else,
including both intution and perception.

If Consensus could still be about a debate, if perhaps not always a scientific debate either, it could go on forever, because it may not be possible to reach any such Consensus,
based on what we could be doing.

If still the optimist around, also that such a work in progress could be for that of counting the possible number of civilizations, rather than making it that of a silly fool,
for that of a lack of possible belief.

If elementary particles are still only the basic parts of nature, in the same way as also the Periodic elements as well, next also the guess that those things which could be Equations,
next could make for those things we could make that of Interaction, or the like.

But next that this word is not there anymore either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle

Not only about the Standard Model here, but at least this should be a way of explaining theoretical physics, if not making any difference between people either,

Not a secret that even scientists are not any fond of Religion as the subject, but rather could make it some 13.8 or 13.9 billion years ago, for that of back to the beginning.

Here again that of possible Consensus for that of a similar throw away, in that it could be both for a couple of things.

Make it perhaps Deputy Commander Charles I. Halt of the Rendlesham Air Force Base, if not Steven Spielberg for the movie E.T. itself, and always there could be a reason to wonder,
just because we happen to be curious at times, and next also make such a thing show up in the way we could be carrying out science.
ID: 1918766 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1918774 - Posted: 14 Feb 2018, 13:34:09 UTC
Last modified: 14 Feb 2018, 13:36:31 UTC

I will save you a bit of trouble for that of possibly moving a bit of stuff.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prism

This pretty good example of when you are using a tool for a given purpose, and next become involved with the particular details, rather than the tool itself.

If not wrong, still a difference between spectroscopy and a spectograph, except for both the Barlow lens for that of magnifying, and also not any microscope either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrograph

I happen to remember that from the old books where that of one thing could be revealing hidden colors in both the rainbow, and also stars, and also the other could be used for that of
determining invisible companions of visible stars, and also their possible orbits as well.

So here apparently the difference between these two things, but also that while at least visible light should be about photons, a prism is not the same as any dice either, for that of making
a couple of guesses in advance.

For one thing, still the rainbow, and next also the prism being used in order to make for such a magnificent display, and in the end we probably are watching only the rainbow.

If the prism should still be the tool for such a thing, we could easily forget that, for that of what we rather could be making of it by means of a particular display.

Perhaps difficult finding any good or reasonable similarity, but for one thing still eyes for that of seeing, and next a brain for that of thinking, among other things.

Only a short one for now, but here I think I came across a point of interest, where there also could be a difference around as well, for that using a particular method.
ID: 1918774 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1919631 - Posted: 18 Feb 2018, 3:04:34 UTC
Last modified: 18 Feb 2018, 3:47:29 UTC

Or perhaps contents, for that of stuff.

I have two more posts in editing, but should tell that I was down on the street again using Google Maps, and next a quite ugly thing visible in the sky.
at least with the photographs, next close to the home of my parents.

Becomes a reminder of science as well, in that you sometimes could not be trusted for that of the dinner which could be served, and next also the contents as well.

Here a couple more of restarts and also losing the tabs again, but was able to track down the melody being listened in at YouTube.
ID: 1919631 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1920139 - Posted: 21 Feb 2018, 2:48:30 UTC

Up again.
ID: 1920139 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1920140 - Posted: 21 Feb 2018, 2:52:26 UTC
Last modified: 21 Feb 2018, 3:32:14 UTC

Eat my shoes here, Mr. Myers.

Next for you, if perhaps not any eat my hat either, except for a couple of fools which could be still left, pretending to be at least such a thing as well.

Oh, for starters only this time.

Edit, perhaps "Beef on the hoof" at times, and next I could also be insane.

But if rather the big "IF" here, and next also the possible question which could be asked as well.

Are we alone, and next also in the Universe as well?

You got the big, or perhaps long line here, Mr. Myers, but next what if I had the possible answer for you, next for also you to see?

Next, hah, hah (again) because it should not be any so, or such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm

Ring a bell perhaps, or at least for what we could perhaps be doing (including both the Man in street, and next also "counting up as usual").

Here counting the possible number of intelligent civilizations, except for not having a hashtable or the similar for that of the underlying material.

Again, hah, for at least such at thing.
ID: 1920140 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1920145 - Posted: 21 Feb 2018, 3:21:00 UTC
Last modified: 21 Feb 2018, 3:24:37 UTC

I lost the the 13 digit gaussian score reported here, as you probably know or noticed, but should be on the server for this.

Except for that, always the discussion which could be around for that of life "as usual" when possibly needed.

Getting back at it.
ID: 1920145 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1920161 - Posted: 21 Feb 2018, 5:01:30 UTC
Last modified: 21 Feb 2018, 5:04:19 UTC

Or we could be just looking at the Method of Proof for such a thing, or this, in order to next make it also a possble witchhunt.

Except for that, I perhaps do not know, at least not now, or for the moment.
ID: 1920161 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1920189 - Posted: 21 Feb 2018, 11:39:32 UTC
Last modified: 21 Feb 2018, 11:43:22 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuA-KqUPa7k

Perhaps or possibly mentioned before.

Except for that, I am not here for that of discussing any nonsense either.
ID: 1920189 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 6995
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 1920190 - Posted: 21 Feb 2018, 11:49:34 UTC
Last modified: 21 Feb 2018, 12:00:59 UTC

So, perhaps Einstein world here, for what you could perhaps or possibly expect.

Make it spacetime and next also the fabric of space, and so on.

Next compare with possible "believers" at the other end, who at least could be pretending a prime number to be at least something.

Next we always could be questioning that of a Consensus in a similar way, if not necesssarily asking for such a thing directly either.
ID: 1920190 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 103 · 104 · 105 · 106 · 107 · 108 · 109 . . . 332 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.