Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 . . . 198 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
When I make it just an Illusion, also that it should be wrong, except for only subject as such, except not any meaning per se, when also explanatory Facts. Like also Rationality, it could end up just baseless, when also groundless, for only a similar Fact. Either I could be still here only proving the intelligent signal for a possible meaning, or I rather could be questioning science instead, for only a different meaning. For that, also Creation for such, when it could be still conditional, except also without meaning as well, because here rather nature for such. If I earlier made it Matter Creation versus Creation myth, it should be easy to just notice, when perhaps only a similar indeciveness as well, for also unfounded. Just reasonable Facts, could still be reason for such, except not any explanatory meaning we could make it, for just Proof. Any two faces you could be making of nature, for also a countenance as well, and perhaps still not any meaning, for also appearance as well. Just reality could be still for real, when only just living, except not any Illusion we could be making it for the opposite, when it also could be the mirror. Proving science could be still only one thing for next only Proof, except not any opposite you could make it, when still for perhaps meaning. Again so easy it could be just making it a hairy creature from alpha Centauri, except any notion you could make it for rather a scientific context. Just leave it out, for only being out of the question, and it also should be excluded, except not anything we rather could assume, for only a contextual meaning. For that, the word encompass as well, except that it could be still meant for Religion here, and the way it could be thought of for such. If nature could still be its own master of sorts, also in its own reign, for just framework, except not any "art" we could make it, for only just a given whole. Making it just infinity for only the limitless thing without border, also within a framework of science for such, when perhaps not any eternal meaning either. Any notion of death you still could make it, should be for the physical, except not any other thing, which could be still only just Religion. The difference which could still exist between these two things, when also brands, could be still just sharp, except not any rift, gorge or valley either. If you still could only exclude, perhaps not any include either, except also part you could make it, for only a certain whole. But if I next key in "Logical exclusion" using the Wikipedia, it does not have that either. Again that some could end up just thinking that the WOW! signal was a scrambled one for such, when only a message, except also the unfounded we still could make it. For that also dubious as well, except not any transformation we could make it, for still just only a meaning. If we rather could make it just "Faith" for its own meaning, it could be still Religion for such, except not any living in hope, for only making the best of it. We still could be proving the elementary particle for only its existence, except not any Higgs boson, but that we still could not do the same, when only just for meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revelation Could this be still only ridicule for such, when perhaps only subject, when perhaps also an Allegory we could be making for the same? Make it rather a face instead, for also a sight or countenance as well, and it could perhaps be still only angels for such, rather than just aliens, except that it should not be any face of just God you could be making it either. But next did it happen, for also ever happen, and we could still leave it to Proof for only such a thing, except not any History behind either. Just Proof for the same, when only necessary, and you also could deem such a thing to be true, when still only a Fact. For that, perhaps that of justification as well, when only justified, except not any Justice you could make it, for only a given expression. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libra_(astrology) Still the constellation in the sky you could be making it here, except only weight, for also weightless, when it could be still also just dumb, or unfounded, because here the little missing "d", for also unsubstantiated as well. Any droplet of water for just being delivered or presented for the Courts, and it should perhaps not hold, for only Evidence, and for that, it should also be unfounded or invalid, for also the exclusion you could make it. But rather just validity for meaning instead, and it could be still Certainty, except not necessarily any Proof either. If God could still present itself for only the hat he could pull off his head, also that of Evidence for such, except still not any Proof. Any valid we could sometimes make it, and also a measure for such, and for that, perhaps all these three, for only just combined, meaning that it should be equal, for only just representation. But next which three, for only that of such, and for that I could be just looking, because an expression could be still both a term and a phrase. Lying for just making it a Proof, and perhaps no such thing either, when the other alternative could be just making it angels for such, when not any aliens either. Making it a better choice for perhaps assuming God, rather than just proving, and you could be still making a choice, except perhaps not any lying for such. For that, it could also end up being a Consequence, when only a Fact for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequentialism Here I could also make it that just 2+3 is still 5, except not any 2+3+5=10, for rather a double sentence instead, and here only just the adding part of the sentence. Making it rather a Derivation instead, and also that you should be able to conclude for only a certain Fact, except not any other you could making it instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivation Therefore, valid or validity, next Conclusion, for only --> for such, making it perhaps also an Implication, when only picking the first one here. But next, perhaps only Arithmetic for such once again, because you could be back at "=", for only an Equation, and not any "it means", for just meaning. Just asking, "how are you", and next "thanks the same", and perhaps only a meaning for such, except not any valid expression. To me this looks like an endless loop of sorts, when that of a Logic could end up being recursive of sorts, for just meaning. But next, making a foundation for only a brick of concrete, and perhaps not any assumption just for meaning, when you could also could the whole house. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity So here it perhaps should not be any Logic either, for that of the same, because here not one link for next the other, when only thinking so. If you could be making it just a Lie for only just proving, also that of an Equation once again, for only E=mc2, except still not any Proof. Here laughter in the audience once again, except not any tools for just a toolbox, when you could make it just Creation per se, and next it could be just Double standards, except not any Reason behind either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_(logic) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction Here time now for the rest of the dinner, because yesterday it became just too much. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion Forgot the link for this in the previous, but if perhaps making it this for only a Lie versus any Doubt we could make it, perhaps almost risky instead. Any valid for also the validity we could be making it, and perhaps not any levels for just the same, when we still could be putting a finger on it, for just meaning. If perhaps only danger instead, perhaps different only for just wording, except not any similar difference we could be making it just for validity. Any stated Fact you rather could make it instead, and also similar Proof as well, only because it could be still true. Therefore, more should not be any less for only being so, when still "<" for also ">" when only just Arithmetic, because either in a different context, but also not any more you could be making it for the same thing, when still the same. Rather still the thing you could be making it for an Illusion, when it sometimes could be the opposite, for also other thing, when not any Truth should mean true either. If you could end up just lying for only making it true, perhaps not such a thing either, and therefore only just an Illusion just for the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise Just follow the leader, and we could be doing so, except sometimes blindfolded for only ourselves, when it could be just meaning. Here that of dumbfool or dumb fooled, when maybe something like that, except not any science without meaning, for just Religion. Assuming any God for whatever it might be, you also could consider as well, except not taking everything into consideration, for what it only could mean. Any whole we still could make it, perhaps could be just infinity, except not any Construct for the same, when not any philosophy for also that. We know that Jesus could be having some 12 disciples, but also that these should not be any angels. Any part you still could make it, could also be that of a whole, except not asking which part it should be either. If you could make it both validness and Truth only to a certain point, it should still be the rest of it, for only its own meaning. So if perhaps adding Proof to it as well, it could be that of "degree" for such, when perhaps only just a leveling, because you could still assume as well. For just only a translation, I could perhaps be sober when not any drunk, except that it perhaps should be down to earth instead. Rather that scientists could sometimes make it the big "If", when only just asking, except not any context it should go, for just meaning. Only being a witness instead, and perhaps just Credibility you could be making it at best, except only just object for its meaning, for not any explanation. For only just traveling two billion years through space, and it could be still a couple of flying objects past my window, except not any more either. Just push and pull, and you could be constantly doing so, except not any repeating process, which could end up going forever. But next nature for any given purpose, for only just purposeful Mind, except not any Truth you could be making it, for only an answer. If someone could be closing the door next for your nose, the door could be still left shut, except you also standing outside, just waiting. Again, that Einstein made it that everything should be relative, except still not any context for just meaning. Space and time could still be a combined context for just making it two, except not any silly versus genius you could make it, for only just being a witness. But again that of measurability we could make it for still space, except not any Credibility for just the same, when it should be value for also worth. Because of that, you could still end up being just illusoric, when it should not be any money for such either. Any second option or alternative you could be making it, for a lack of Evidence, and it could end up being a mockery at worst, for also an Allegory as well. There could be still sheep making up a herd only for such, but next also the Shepherd needed as well, and for that it could be "follow the leader". Just clemency when also mercy as well, and we could be thinking that it could be a "savior" as well, except not any Hell we could be making it, for just doomed. Similarly, an elementary particle you perhaps could make it of nature, should not be the same as any witness to an event, when you could be still proving. Proving nature could be still just fine, except not any Allegory you could be doing for the same, when rather just the opposite. But still that any picture you could be making it for just meaning, and not any illustration either, because it should not be the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illustration Just framework when it should be just meaning for the same, and still only science for the same, when only just in a contextual meaning. Maybe just inconclusive at times, except not any term we could be making for the similar, when it only could be the proven science, versus not any Religion for the same. Just need to know, for only a secret act, and perhaps only basis for such, except not any written act, because here only a Commandment at best. If perhaps rather a sight instead, for also a countenance as well, also that we could be making it face as well, except that it perhaps should be such for God. Proving science to be wrong, could be still true, for only the Fact we could make it, except not any similar when only a religous meaning. Instead it could be still only love and marriage for the sexual machine you could be making it, except not any pulsating act just left to decide. Some people could end up making it multiverses for only a respective meaning, except not any Parallelism for just the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallelism So help me God instead, and for that only making it awe for such, except not any fear instead when not any reverence either, and it becomes still not any meaning. But rather so long, for still the nature we could appreciate, when also value and worth, except those things left unexplained, for not any Miracles either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamorphosis_(disambiguation) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shapeshifting Perhaps I should still be sticking to Genesis for only a given way of life, except not any other meaning I could make of it either, because here not the original idea. We know that just a quarrel could also make for a disagreement, and still only science for such, except not any Plausible facts we could be making it instead. Only just dynamics became General Dynamics for the same, except not any spoken Facts, when rather the beginning and end for just the Universe. Stil only bits and pieces a couple of times, except not any philosophical Argument we could be making it, because it could also be Philosophy as well. Only one versus the other, and it becomes vice versa instead, except still not any this or that for just meaning, when only just proven Facts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exception_handling Here I was hoping it could be any such for also Logic as well, but apparently not so this time, because it perhaps became tax exempt in the previous. Making ourselves just for that of any meaning, could still be the thing I could make it, when perhaps not any observational Facts for just witnessing. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Maybe just empty Sets again, but here again that all of this was meant to be in a context of nature, not any villain or hero we could be making of just ourselves. Just in the same way as true and false could be the opposite for just Logic, we could also make it that of Falsfification and Truth next for the same, if not any Lie versus Doubt either. Add to it also that of the Uncertainty Principle, and it became almost like someone creating a dish for someone to taste, except adding his name to it. For that, just making it two tongues for just speaking, if not any Janus face for the same either. Except for that, any UFO research could be still the proven science for only a couple of Men in Black, when not any handshake either, because such a thing as "Faceless coward", I rather could be leaving to just sake of Belief instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_protocol So here perhaps not anything dealing with just a Consensus we could make it either, but rather the way communication could be carried out, for just transmitting a message, except not any Intelligence either. Any wrongdoing is a thing we could only be doing for ourselves, except perhaps not the same as any validity, when only rather numbers instead. Just believing for only the opposite, could still be a thing you could do, except also the Consensus we could be making for the same, when rather an agreement. For that, the never ending discussion which never could cease to take place, only for such a thing. Try keying in "Alien handshake" using Google, and next see what you get, except not any validness for the same. For that it could be eyes to eyes as well, except not any message delivered, when also a transmission as well. If Arthur C. Clarke could be the Godfather of science-fiction, you could be still left up deciding just for that, except still validity just for meaning. Any founded for just unfounded, and next also that as well, when still not any proven, because sometimes things could end up just stringent as well. We could be still having the International Space Station orbiting Earth, but not any wheel of fortune for just the same, when only a circular object. Any trust your feelings for the same, and it could be that of Imagination once again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imagination We know that a gunshot could be coming from close range at times, for only just a murder, except not any bliss for the same, when just the victim, but rather that the culprit, or wrongdoer could be feeling satisfaction when only doing such a thing, except not any meaning for just the same. Just an egg meeting a sperm inside the vomb of a given mother, and next perhaps no such thing as any previous or before, when it could only be next or thereafter instead, and here just for upcoming life. Any past or before for just the thing happening, could therefore end up being only in a context of Religion, when only just a thought outcome for the same. Dreams could still be a natural part for only life, like also Hallucinations as well, if not any Hypnosis either, but also that an Illusion could end up just a Fata Morgana. Any lifespan you could be making it for just a human, perhaps not the same for any star or galaxy, when it rather could be billions of years instead, and here for only just the physical part of it, when perhaps not any more. But next that any flip out we could be making it, perhaps could be just fainting a little, except not any adverse condition you could make it either. Life could still be precious, and for that also important, except not any valid science we could be making it for the rest, when still only Religion. But again that it rather should be about credible Evidence again, except not any observational Facts we could be making for the same, and for that, only just sorry to say, except for still perhaps the same story. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmatism So why not any intelligent life at Tabby's star, I may ask? I do have some six accounts here in total, for only that of my stupidity, but that does not necessarily leave me any off, for only just asking. Any compassion I sometimes could make it, for not any ruthlessness either, and for that, perhaps not any science I could pay for, by means of only ordering. Justice being carried out, could sometimes be only decisiveness, except not any fulfillment next for nature, when it rather could be a given wish. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inversion If perhaps not any wrong sentence here, for only just wording, it sometimes could end up being a flip-flop here, except not any square within a square, for also inside, when the smaller could be ending up at the upper right, for not any left, when only sideways. Do the same with both a line versus a curve, and next both that of beginning versus end, except not any n-dimensional you could make it, except the single point. Just zig-zag instead, for perhaps only a ladder or stairs, and not any irregular either, when only a pentagon versus a hexagon instead. Rather trust instead, and next also for meaning, except not any validness you could make it for science, when still only nature. Any Rationality you could make it, could also make it similar validity as well, when perhaps not any irrational, for just the opposite. But stiil also that of a billion results in the master database, except not the single hit for only a positive detection, when it should be still valid. So, if perhaps any reason for making it just aliens for only just crooked, perhaps it should not be any such for next doing the same with me, for only being just curious. For the same reason, it could also be the investigative detective as well, for only carrying a loupe in his hand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology Again this one, if not always so, because here I may be unable to resist, for only the male I could be, and therefore be sensing my surroundings a little better than women, for only my inherited hunting skills, except still women better on quite many subjects. Any growling, and it could become those things not of any meaning, for not any worth, except for also those things which should be still worth, and here just excuses instead. For that, it could be that of significance at times, except those things which could be only just insignificant, next for only meaning. But next perhaps not any translation needed, for just forgetting a letter, because you rather could bend it out of shape, for only becoming the wrong context. So, if any recognition you rather could make it instead, perhaps such a thing should still be for that of science, except not any Religion. Just blindfolded instead, for not any ability to just see, and it could also be the answer never in front of you, for the acknowledgment you could be able to make. Only just counting a couple of times, and next not any rely on me for just the same, because I still could be able to prove just Idiocy at times, for not any valid. Perhaps it could be still that of Inertia a couple of times, except not any flawed mechanism we could be making for nature, for not any working. Any acceleration you could make it, for only increasing speed, and next that of an escape velocity for such as well, except not any drag for just the opposite, when it could be the massive object just attracting a little, for only pulling you back. Just the opposite at times, for also inverse as well, and it becomes the cubit for such, when perhaps not any flip-flop you could make it, for only opposite Forces. Just detecting, for only observing, and it could be the neutral issue, when still not any answer we could be making for the same, when not any positive results. We should know about the Laws of physics right now, for also similar Equations, except not any vacuum you could make it, for only emptiness of space. Just do it, for only a couple of things, and it also could be feasible, except not any conversion you could make it, for only transforming it into another structure. Logic should still be for its meaning, except not any Implication you could be making it instead, for only a deduction, when perhaps still only a guess. But rather still nature for both purpose and meaning, except not any interchange we could make it. Just only making it both at times, it becomes that of irr- when it should be only the start or beginning of a word, except not any prefix you could make it for the opposite, so if still not any inverse for any opposite either, that of complementary, for just a compliment, could be still haunting me, except not any Logical complement you could make it. Make it a robbery instead, and you could end up being pushed against the wall, except still not any reason to believe, when it only could be the Force of gravity. Proving could be still possible to do, except not any reason to believe you could end up making it, for perhaps rather being something else instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof Rather assume instead, except not taking anything for granted either, and still not any flaws you could make it for nature, only because it could be meant for a meaning. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Just push the car instead, because also I could be knowing a couple of things as well. Maybe just flaw is not any failure either, except only recognition for that of Fact instead, when it could become only imagination for just believing. Spell it wrong instead, and it becomes imgainatory for just the same. Just rest on your laurels instead, except not any shoulders either, for only making it an assumed meaning for a couple of things, when just guessing, and here not any Men in Black either, for also a couple of wide open eyes. I could end up making it Proof with respect to nature instead, except for still only Proof just flawed for its own meaning, while still not making it any other measure for a couple of things we could still witness and observe, for only just reality. We are not supposed to be looking for any ants, but rather someone who could be better than us, but still with respect for nature, for only what we could make it. Just thinking that it could be science for only just one thing, for also Religion for next the other, and perhaps not any third, for the thing perhaps of no meaning. So here that of an experiment for only such a thing, when just thinking that nature could be an experiment for only its own, when perhaps neither flaw or ridicule perhaps of no valid meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliquot Here perhaps a possible option, when only thinking in such a way, because here also the operators separating each Set, when also that of contents. But also that there could be one billion results in the database, for only just reported, except not any declaration being made, for only just success. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Perhaps needless to say, but nature could still be the winner, except not any provable science you could make it. This because it could be Mysteries, Magic, and Miracles at times, and still we need to prove. But next that even Proof itself could be having its flaws, except not any Religion we could make it either. Just ridicule once again, for also mockery, and once again just laughter from the audience, except not any absolutes we could be making it either. If rather making it respective meaning, for only separate as well, and it could be a better explanation, except still not any unexplained itself. For that also flaw as well, which could be for a Method, except not any nature for the same, when it could be only slipping, and next falling. Here a lack of grip for just the same, except not any Inertia we could be making it for gravity, when also acceleration as well. To me it looks quite obvious that the Universe could be created, except not any Intelligent Design for such either. But next perhaps not any good or evil for just the same, except rather an ultimate Force instead, for only being responsible. The open question could still be that of the 200 digit triplet, for only lurking just in between, but here only keeping a watch, for not any interfering. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics Here just an overkill, except not any "Eine kleine nachtmusic" either, because it could at least be irregular in shape, except not any irrespective, for just meaning. Just balancing, and it could be an act for such, except only a straight line for such. Just blue eyes, and next Blue Moon as well, except not making it any Creation per se, when also a Creator for just the same. Any purpose, and still also meaning, except not necessarily any Proof we could make it, when only just an act, but here it could be still only science. Our ways to measure, should still be for that of the physical world, except not on behalf of any Metaphysics either. Any high fidelity should be still only for sound, except not any capabilities you could make it, for only just striving a little, for also effort. Just knock it off instead, and for that leave a couple of things alone, except not any out of the question for not any valid, and here perhaps not any guess is needed, for that of the same. Because if making it any probable, rather than provable, next how much, for that of the same, rather than less instead, when still only a way to measure as well. Any small likelihood for that of a chance, and also a similar Probability as well, except not any difference you could make it, and next with only respect to itself, for not any self-reference, or cross-reference you could be making it, for also complexity. Just the real instead, for only reality, and sometimes the imaginable as well, for only Imagination, except not any Proof you could make it, when still only science. Just an ostrich with its head in the sand, and also a signal we could be making it for the same, except not any Logic we could make it for only just proving. This because if rather making it imaginatory instead, it only adds to the puzzle, for only similar complexity. Perhaps it once came into being for only us just guessing, except not any guesswork for the same, when still only Proof. For only just being near-sighted, I could be still making it 0 versus "." for only just a dot, except not necessarily prove for just the same. Could science be still fixed, when only that of Aspect, and next still Religion just open, when both that of meaning, and next also Proof, once again. So, if stupidity could still kill the cat, also that ridicule could also be for meaning, except not any laughter we could be making it instead. But here that just mockery could be a point worth mentioning as well, when we still should not believe anything either. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Any sight, for also countenance we could make it, should be in the context of Religion for such, except not any "shut your mouth", when not daring to say anything. Could science perhaps end up being on behalf of Religion, or could I still make it a non-physical world, for just thinking a little? Any "Clockwork orange" you could make it, and still perhaps not any watch in your hand for just holding, when you also could be using your fingers. For that, at least the repairman, except not any easy fix for the same, which could be making it in good shape. So here making it science-fiction in the previous, except not any Wizard of Oz either, for just another, when it perhaps could be more to it, than first told. Any wit you sometimes could make it, and not any with, for just withholding, except not any fun you could be making it, for just a joke. But if still any Bias you could have, also different opinions as well, except not ending up on any end, for only the result you could accomplish. Rather that once again we should know what the other alternative is, except still not any proving for the same. But rather that the labyrinths you sometimes could make it, for also intricacies as well, should not be telling about any difficulties you could expect. Any Proof you still could make it, should be Proof for just the same, except not any countenance you could be making it, for only the context of Religion. Here also that context should be replaced with a slightly better word, like for example framework. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
But still rather the subdivision we could make it, when not any ridge or gorges, when also valleys and cliffs as well. For just everything that is, also that it should be, except not any division we could make it, for only just splitting it up. When perhaps so, it becomes components as a result, rather than granularity, making me thing that also that of inverse could be important, except only for just meaning. If science could still make us think, it also should make us able to reason as well, except perhaps only believe for just a word, when only just Religion. Here perhaps that of Divide and Conquer as well, except any split personality you could be making it for meaning, because opinion could also be attitude. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_conquer If I made it obtain in the previous, it could also be seek as well, except that for such, I rather could be looking outside instead, for only vastness of space, except not any Truth you could make it, for just proving. Perhaps validness could be still a goal itself, for only the thing you could be wishing for, except not any results you could obtain, by just gathering a little, because if an excuse was perhaps that of making it Energy a couple of times, perhaps no such thing for rather making it extraterrestrial intelligence. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality And once again, only a description I could be making it for such a thing, except not any depiction either. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modularity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistics I made it the wrong link in the previous, for only slightly so, except also another word visible in between the lines. So, if perhaps only Intelligent Design for sometimes a nature we could make of it, perhaps not any Creator you could make it for only just the same. We still could be making it robots for only thinkable things, except not always any personality, for rather a Mind. Just making it Bias could end you up being almost anonym, except not any middle of the crowd, for only just standing. Proving could be still one thing, except not any such for those goals we could wish to obtain, by only striving a little, and for that, only results at times. If numbers sometimes could be telling a little, for not any science either, at least it could be that of Statistics, when only a mean average rather than just endpoints. But if just a pop-up could make you feel happy at times, perhaps not any peak for the same, when also a peek, except that a crawler is not always a creep, for just lying flat. But also that just a-ha could be still only a band, except not any experience being sensed, for only making a better discovery. Any difference between top and bottom, and we should know what it means, except that also an average could be making for a statistical summary. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Module https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient I could be still of the opinion that science could be flawed, for more that of our observational capabilities, for also the techniques we could use, except rather validness itself, when only for this project. We know that it is a continuous and steady process for what we only could be doing, except still proving for the same, when it could be the intelligent signal being found. The second link above, makes it still Quotient here, except rather making it test here at first, for only keying in. So, except not any Rationality instead, could it be rather a rationale for expressing a given sentence for only a specific meaning, when it should be context for such? Or could I rather be slamming the door, while it could be still wide open? Here not any split apart, when also separated, but rather a general opinion that everything started from a single point, for only being created, but rather this time the modularity we could make it, for sometimes granulated structures. Perhaps this could be the main factor for just everything, for next also the way it could be explained, except still Quantum mechanics for such? Any difference between this subject, for also Chaos theory, and once again I am not the expert here, for only wondering a little. If you could think that I am quite much worth, for also valuable as well, also that of precious metals, like gold, if not any diamonds either, for also the clusters of galaxies throughout space, for only their contents. Here again not translating for the better word again, and it happens quite often now. I recently found that the word mean, for rather average, could be quite important, except not only Statistics. Still summa summarum for a couple of things, except for the one ending up in the middle. for only a typical representation. If perhaps so, also that of bias as well, which could be that of having two separate opinions, for also diverse at times. You do not necessarily make a curve into a straight line by only flattening it a little, except that it eventually could become so. Any reflexes for only muscles instead, and it could be another word or two you also could use. We could find ourselves at the top of the ladder, for only ourselves, except not any measure for possible others, except only nature itself. I could be making it First-order Logic at times, except not any high ranking order for the same, but still I could be average, for only in the middle. But supposedly we could still be not looking for any ants either, but rather a couple of angels which could be a product of science fiction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_fiction Make it any new direction for where science perhaps should go, for that of direction, and perhaps still not any Religion, for just being another purpose. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Here I ran out a bit empty, but found this while reading. https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/nebula_web/storage.php Section Performance at the top is missing a "g" in a word, and also the whole thing ending with a comma at the bottom end. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Maybe just a hand instead, rather than just fingers, for only crunching a lump of stone. Energy could still be only a product of nature, for the way it could be produced, but also that it could be production for such, here on Earth. Left with an assumption, and still a Dyson sphere for such when still just production versus consumption, except also the Intelligence which could be coming along. Just me, for only myself, and it could be the brain I could possess, except not any quantum processes taking place in the right part, for only a couple of Dreams. One thing could be just proving others, for only ourselves, except also making it reason for a couple of things, when also believing as well. Nature could still be a whole, for only its make, except not the way it perhaps was created, for only an initial moment for such. But next perhaps not any Religion for just Blashphemy, when we also could be making it the supernatural, for that of possible angels. Only one reason, and it could be a simple reason, except not any other for just the same, which could leave you still thinking. Any shame you could be making it, for only remorse or anger coming back at you, and perhaps also regret for the same, except perhaps not any Sin being a notion for any Hell, when it could also be a demise for just an ending. Here that of the renunciation you still could get or receive, for also an absolution as well, except not any Purgatory you could be making it, for only two different entrances, when just leaving. So here still perhaps St. Peter waiting for me at the door, for just an angel, except not any Saint you could be making it, for just name. Again that the word Purgatory should be a sacred word in its own context, except for the meaning it could be used, when both attitudes for such. We know that Matter could become Energy for only a fusion process for such, except not any transformation it could be either, because here that of transition or changeover as well. But next perhaps the "Force" you could be making it for a Saint versus angel, when it should only be sacred for such, next without any meaning. Any Divinity you could be making it instead, and at least it should not be any mockery for such, when still only a moniker or Allegory here as well. This also with no respect for that of Religion as well, for only that of subject, because here it should be rather science instead. If gravity could be still a Force of nature, perhaps not any synonym for such, when it could also be the opposite or inverse, for still only nature. Only assuming God, and you could still only believe instead, because it should be for the better, because here only the initial moment of Creation for just the thing it ended up to be. Just sorry, but still you could be dismissing a signal of the past for not being any valid, and for just an excuse, I could end up just a believer instead. Here one book could be showing the theoretical shape of the Universe, for only being flat, versus a bent curve, and here both ways for such, making it just positive and negative, when not having the other word for next meaning. Gravity is supposedly bending space for only its visual appearance, except that it perhaps should rather be Topology instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topology And here, never say never for just the other thing either, because it became found, because if still just spiraling inward, it could also be an eddy for such, except not any Event Horizon you could be making it, for only the point of no escape, and here light. Next only packed density, for only being the added sentence, because here Matter becomes so concentrated, that it becomes just pure gravity here at first, and here, for only inside the Event Horizon. Gravity supposedly attracts, for only the Force it could be, and next it sucks anything close or nearby inside itself, for only growing in size. The only reason for making a Black Hole existent, or found, is that of the singularity in the middle, for only its center, where gravity becomes infinite. But again, perhaps not any smile here either, because I could be still making it another reason, for a couple of things. Always the levels and thresholds you could make it, for perhaps a ladder as well, but here thinking that it could be still two-fold, for only different Aspects of nature. If you could be making it any moniker for only the physical world we could see and observe, perhaps no such thing either, for only an Illusion instead. But if perhaps two different things here, perhaps the believable versus unbelievable in a single context, for those things we still could only could prove. For that, Religion could be just faltering, for any science you could be making it instead, except for the dumb versus brilliant, except not any idiot you could be. Just being scientists, we could still dismiss Religion for not being any value, except for the way we could think of Creation, for only reason behind. And for that, not any whisper in the dark, when it should be a debate for such, when only in a framework of science, for not any realm either. While away, it became that of Cause and Effect, for rather the other thing instead, which should be still only the same. For that, perhaps not any excuse either, except that it should not be any flip or switch, for only making it the opposite, for just only thinking. So, if perhaps time for the dinner, perhaps no such thing for just making it attitude, when I could be still thinking. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Did I get it finished, or did I forget the hope here, for not realizing any facts either? Maybe just a singer here instead, and if not any wrong, when only just appearance, because here it could be still your day, for also mine. For that, only the nice touch here, for not any aggravated assault which could be happening on the street, for only fatal consequences. Still the problems with my flat, so here not forgetting the other things either, for next what I also could say. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity Here making it that of Black Holes in the previous, except forgetting the link, but also that light should not escape either, for only the better explanation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole Just the speed of light, for not any matter it could represent, and still perhaps only photons here, except also Special Relativity here as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon Here not reading all the details, except that it could be perhaps something being wrong, because here only an elementary particle for such, except not any Quantum mechanics either. Only two or more different realms at times, except for still the same science it could be. Could you next balance it a little, and next think that Matter and Energy could be still equal, for just proportional, or should it rather be the different Forces of nature, for only being Fundamental for such? Here making it at least Electromagnetism for such, except not any time either, when it could be just accelerating a little, for only getting at the speed of light. Just dismissed for that of a couple of Miracles at times, and next perhaps no such thing as "Let me present myself" either, for only the scientist I could be, because here sometimes that of proven Facts, for only those things which could be proven. But here perhaps not myself either, for rather the other, who I unfortunately forgot the name for, but could be Dr. Stephen Hawking, except that it could be rather that of a different context for only the same nature. Just two properties for that of space, and next perhaps not the same either, when it should be only a single thing. Radiation could be an end result of only the fusion process, where Matter is being converted into Energy, except still only the Photon for such. Any different reason, for only another explanation, and it could be still the soil of the Earth, for also water and air as well, except not any physical Mind. Just take one thing for granted, except not another, and it could be still the hinge for such, except not any explaining for such either. Any ridicule could still be part of nature, except not any process for just the same, except that we also could make it just laughter at times. If a Creator perhaps found that it could work, next not any faltering, for rather success for the same, when perhaps not any slipping for just falling either. Here I guess that just fondling at times, could be just trying as well, except not any attempting, for just the same. The faltering mechanism could still be the clock not working, for only a missing battery, except also a broken pin inside as well, but if perhaps rather making it success versus nature for only nature instead, it could perhaps be that of infallibility instead. Any Creation per se, for only just the Big Bang, and it also became Instantiation as well, for only the Force of gravity being present, and also Inertia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertia Any reason for just meaning we somtimes could make it, and only blame gravity for such a thing, The heart could still pulsate, for only deliver blood, but for that still only a continuing process, for just repeating itself, but if still doing so, perhaps not any success rate versus failure rate either, when it perhaps could not work at times. Hopefully you catch me, except still only just profound a couple of times, when only just writing, because here I also was left to assume as well. Here just a Coincidence for only its own, or itself, because here spelling it wrong for that of faltering in the previous, but also this popping up. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Faltermeyer Just on the spot, making it "Beverly Hills cop" here, except that it also became Blade Runner here as well. But rather the two different things for only gravity versus Inertia, when also a Force for the first one, when next only that of produce, except not any initial you could be making it, for only reason versus meaning. Here thinking about the stopwatch you could be holding in your hand, and next clock in one or more mean or split time, for only an average. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronization For that, not just any make and break, for only the lump of stone which could be crunched between your fingers, but rather that you could be making it still "per se" for a couple of things, except not anything in motion either, for only speed. Any humble or petty you sometimes could be, and next not any noble either, for only just generosity, when also that of soft versus hard at times. Still I could be a sitting duck, for only the emptiness of space, when also its environment, when also the science going nowhere, for not any result. Maybe just fine vine for just drinking, and perhaps not any grapevine, for rather club soda instead. Make it rather a heart attack, and it could still pulsate, except not any irregular for only rhytm, except not any irrational for just meaning, when it should make no sense. irrational - synchronize So here a friend of my younger brother suffering from harelip, for only mentioned, except not any Valley of shadows you could be making for a rift or gorge, because here also that of loopback or traceback as well, when it could be only such for meaning, except not any exact or precise for any similar. Any doomed for only a bad thing happening, and perhaps only an end, except not the end either, when perhaps not anything for just forever either, because you always could anticipate for a couple of things happening, for not any always so either. In the old days, Viking going to sea, for only making a travel, came to watch the bent horizon, and next think it could be just falling, when only a waterfall for such. But here I perhaps be rather stupid, for only making it the provable science instead, because here only a bent shape, for not any straight line either. Any Construct you could be making it instead, and it could still falter, except not making it any Alien Interview for just the same either. Here guessing that it could be some Truth for only the story, except being reminded about the moniker or Allegory once again, for only a substitute. So, if if still just a noname for any thing we could make it, perhaps also nature for its own meaning, when only making it Matter Creation once again. The problem here is that any supernatural you could make it, for not any MMM either, and it supposedly could be God for the same, for next back at Religion, and here Mysteries, Magic, and Miracles for just that. Rather that it should be for its own meaning, when only separate for such, and for that we could be still making it Matter Creation versus Creation myth. If I still could be taking a couple of granted, next perhaps not any Type III, for what I could be just able to see, except only Type I or Type II instead, except for still only personal meaning or opinion here. Any female you rather could be instead, and you should not forget your lips, for also the eggs you could be carrying with you, because if stiil Fertilization here, perhaps not any excreted life, for only spilling a little at times. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertilisation Any life you still could be making of it, could be strewn across the Universe, if only so lucky, except only my bad for making it secretion for also gland instead, because sometimes just expensive for a couple of things, except not any precious you could be making it, when also valuable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Productivity Rather trace it back to an initial moment instead, because it was there it all started, except not any bent or inclined factors you could make it instead. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Going_for_the_One Realizing a fact, except not any upon either, for still only a Fact. Any clever instead, and we know what that should mean, except not any silly or dumb either. Any love and affection, and it could be still for your next one only, except the one in between the stars, for only being lost. Any sexual relationship, and perhaps not any intern either, for only Monica Lewinsky, but here only a given name. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monica_Lewinsky https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_sexuality Maybe just a joke instead, and it could become Dave or David Allen, and here losing a finger, only for such. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Allen Have a cigar for only the ring you could blow, except not any smog or fog for such either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_Nebula Any Saturn instead, and I perhaps could ride a horse, for not any Mythology either, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth#Mythology Here, scroll down a little once again, for only being included. Yes, but for both the small and large, when next the multitude you could make it, except not any minuscule either, also that of a split, for also divide, when perhaps not any Divide or Conquer either, but rather a subdivision instead, for only making it smaller samples. Here perhaps a bit poor again, for only the part we could be making it, next for that of a whole, which should still be that of infinity, for only a context. If Einstein was perhaps able to conclude, also that he could prove, except not making it any time for only a context, when also a part. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_reference Always the little way of thinking, except not any reference I could be making it for such either. So, right versus wrong, and next you think it could be at least something, except not any Creation per se, when also a meaning. Any sins, for also remorse, and also despair, except not any renunciation, next for only that of the church. Is just Truth could make for Doubt instead, perhaps only science for such, when also meaning, except not any church rejecting for the same. But next, any cubit you could be making for that of 9/11, and still only despair, except not any Event, for just the same. Just bits and pieces, and next also parts as well, for not any whole you could make it, except only infinity. Just a circle, for that of a ring, and next rays coming from it, for only just emanating, and it could be God in the center, for that of Matter Creation and Creation myth, next combined. But also that both these two should be only a notion for such, except not any explained, while still perhaps God unexplained, for just being noname, or moniker. Here that of acquire once again, for also dedicate or assign as well, because here not any ligament either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Bighorn Oh, so sad, for only a story, except not any tribulation for the same, because it could be only Indians being slaughtered down, for only white supremacy, except not any dominance either. Could science be only just neutral, and next not any partisan, and perhaps next "hah-hah". for only a bluff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobelium Maybe just call 999 instead, for not the song you could make it either, and here not having the title, for only a "rat-tat-tat". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_physics So, why not make it provable science instead, for only the Monotheism instead? Is it perhaps success versus failure here, or could it rather depend, for only circumstances? "<>" - Just give me a smile, if you will, except not any exception for just a meaning, when rather expression instead. Cut it short instead, and it becomes a sign, rather than a signature, for only minus ("-") or unary, and here not the dash, or hyphen. That of enforcing a will could be still true, except not any Alien Interview for the same, when it only could become that of Constructs. Here just my failure for making it liable only just a lie, except not any liability, for just the same. Just Determinism instead, and you could be able to determine, except not any Certainty, for only just Truth. But still only Monotheism here, for not any pluralistic either, and you could be still making it a single God. Next, which phrase should I perhaps use, for only just meaning? Oh, we found the WOW! signal not being any valid, didn't we, except not any Cause for just a meaning either? For heavens sake, but next make it Religion instead, because it could be only such a thing we could think. Any renunciation, and next also a Sin as well, except for only just the moniker you could make it, when next also noname. Make it rather "Faceless coward" instead, and it becomes attributable, because it could be for that of a scientific meaning. Just the picturesque, for not any grotesque either, and here two hands. for also arms, when also five fingers, on each respective hand. Only the hidden sentence instead, and next you could think that it was God only just hiding, except not any science you could be making of it. A type III civilization, should be that of such, for only command and control, except not any energy output, for only what they could produce, for also consume, but next also the producer-consumer model, only for that of such. Rather only with respect with nature instead, except not proving for this and that, when it also could be that of et cetera. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_cetera So kind, so nice, but here at least expressing my meaning, for only doing so, except not any solemny night, for only a hymm. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacrament So here perhaps not any admirable for only being picturesque, when also exemplary as well, because if perhaps only a model for such, perhaps not any picture, but rather a beauty instead. Maybe just a hero instead, except rather the boss you could blindly obey, for just being a slave, because here not any pattern either. At times, both that of a predecessor and successor for each, except the one you could still only admire, for only personality. Making it just a football club, and you could be still a supporter, except not any staunch ally for such either. Perhaps it rather could be a playful melody, for not any foolish words either, and maybe just "ring a bell" for such, except not any Probability either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chorus Any music instead, and next a note for such, except not any director needed, for only an unanimous play, and here also timbre, for also reverb as well. Any deep bass for only sound, and it could become a hum as well, except not any pitch instead, which could be only a high sound. Only an earthquake instead, and it becomes a deep rumble being heard, from inside the Earth. Just steps instead, and next stairs as well, except not any similar we could be making it for nature, when only just equal, or equality. So here consistence at times, when it rather should be correspondence instead, and next for only that of equal, when not any juxtaposition either. Making it also that of accordance here, for only a line a bit too long. Just "trip-trap" instead, and for that, I still could be climbing the stairs for only a zig-zag, except not making it any elevator either. Just Stairways to Heaven instead, and I could still only climb, except not taking any lift either. Perhaps everything could be still relative, and for that not any Heaven or Hell, when rather just climbing, you could slip and fall a little. Just failure versus success, and we could also deem such a thing for only a result as well, except not any think, for just the same, when only just Philosophy instead. Any daunting experience you could be making it, and perhaps not any 0 versus 1, for only the provable science you could make it, except only just Logic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology For that of the latter, I could make it Homer just on the spot, but need checking, for rather Parmenides. So here perhaps still only the deep, for only a rumble, except not any ramblings you could make it, for only a couple of sciences through ancient times. Next evolving, and it becomes the modern sciences for such, which also could be proven, for only meaningful Facts. So here that of an alignment for also line-up when next only position for such, except also doing it for that of epochs for that of ancient life, and here dinosaurs. This really because it should be a special word for this, for next I do not have, except only time frames for such, when not any timeframes either. Adding just a hyphen to it, perhaps should be not any more help either. Indeed, just purpose and meaning for only just nature, except not any act for such, when it could be that of obedience, and next, still just wrong. Always that of making a thing specific, and you could also enforce, for only the same meaning, because for that, not any substitute either, and here also oblige or compel as well. But if rather assuming that it could be free and loose as well, also that of a meaning as well, except not any purposeful for such either. Just order of sequence, for only a couple of letters, and perhaps not any Laws you could be making it for science either, because it could be more specific. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic But next wait a little, for not assuming either, because only doing so, it could be just one thing versus the other, except perhaps not my intention of doing it so. Just put forward instead, and sometimes it could only be an Idea for such, when not any speculation either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea Here quite nice touch, for only the figure at the right, and here Plato. Again, the valley, for not any cliff or shadows either, but rather a gorge instead, and it could perhaps be such, when still that of the church versus science, except not any Saint, for also angels, you could be making it. So here just an Oath, for also allegiance, and next not there for only combined, because I could still swear, and only make science of it. Just temptation instead, and perhaps making it God for just "everything", except not any infiinity just for science, because you know I also was "inclined". Still only just achieve here, except not any reach either, when only reaching for a Conclusion, when still not any temptation either. uniform - homogeneous - consistent Any of these one, and it also could be broad for the same, except not any other interpretation you could be making it either. Just making it the little "ly", and perhaps only a lie for such, except not any consistent versus consistently either. If rather sudden instead, it also becomes suddenly, except not any surprise you could be making it either. Nah, only just the cubit instead, and for that, you could end up almost tired, for only that of narrowband signal. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-phase_and_quadrature_components Should we discuss this instead, for only running into the sand, or should it rather be the better, for only just doing? I still could be having fun, of course, except not the 6.7 million in total credit, for only just being here, and here a couple of 12 digit gaussian as well, for only a score. Any Jesus, for next come to me, and perhaps not any approach we could be doing for the same, when just only climbing a little, because it could also be a handshake. Stupidity could still kill the cat, except not any meddle we could be doing it for only interfering, when perhaps only Idiocy for such, and for that, maybe rather "Yours faithfully" instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobility https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modularity Dangit, but for only just conform, I could be making it Telekinesis instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychokinesis hitherto Always that of betterment you could make it, for also with respect with, and it could be still that of aliens, for only the technology they could possess, except not any shield they could make, for only protection. For that, only just a saga, when only a story, except not any encapsulate either, when it rather should be about real Facts. Any compressed, and it could be also for a meaning, except not any summary you could make either, when perhaps rather a core instead. thus - hence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_standard Here perhaps ML1 again, for that of Chaos theory and randomness, except only myself for being clean and unison, for only that of unambiguity or uniqueness. So, if still with respect to, and I could also be able to compare as well, when only that of the small versus larger, except not any little, for only less. Only just concentrate here, for only a will or wish, and perhaps still a stated meaning, for only expressing as well, except still not any stated Facts, because any deviation you could make, you could also lose track, except not any Truth for that of an answer, when it should be still the answer itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deviation gap - divergence - discrepancy Next explain the whole thing for me, just for an Idea, because here I mentioned the plane getting lost, except not the other thing you could make of it. misleading - deceptive Maybe just crooked instead, for not any valid sentence you could be making it, because here not any Courts either. Here keying in "First go basis", and next "Given name" for that of the result, and next what did I previously write, for only Relational algebra? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Given_name signature - key Any infallibilities you still could make it, and perhaps for science when such, when next not any Religion either, because here I could be left stuck on that of versus for that of science, versus any next you rather could make it. Again slipping a little, for not just any falling either, but at least that of correspondence here. Is it perhaps rather that of "own" here for only making it, or should it still be that of the church versus science, for only different "beliefs", except not any Theology either? The unexplained could still be not any provable, but for that, perhaps not any Tautology or Ontology either. Rather just Myth for its own context, for also Mysteries and Magic as well, except not making it any Proof just that of Truth either. For not any c.f. or unambigous, I next could also be making it equivocal here as well, but next for only word, and not any meaning either. Follow you, follow me, and next "->" Just means here, for only a meaning, except not any unison or ambiguity either, because if still only unclear, and it could be that of a diversion instead. Here perhaps thinking that it could be Sets for at least one thing, when also Chaos theory versus Quantum mechanics, next for the other. But except for that, only the notion of Cosmos I could be making it, and next for that of a whole. Just say hello instead, for next only a meaning, because perhaps not any guardian or janitor either, for being a Reason behind, when also possible. You could still slip and fall for only the stairs, when only one step at a time, because if rather success versus failure for only a gain, we could also be making it a Probabilistic issue, for only that of failed Logic at times, because here successful outcome, for also failed as well. Lost the original idea, but if still versus, also that of outcome, and next also the same once again, for perhaps rather infallibilities instead. Any success, and perhaps the big + only for such, except not any - instead, when perhaps not any Logic either. But next that any "quantifiable Logic", is perhaps not a thing you could do either, because it could also be that of particular result. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductive_reasoning Make it two expressions instead, for only just big ones, and next only vice versa, for also this and that. But rather opinion versus meaning instead, and it could become the church versus science, except not any Scientififc method we could make it instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myth Just dangit here, for only the first one, because next I should also know, except not making it so, for only the opposite, or next one, either. Again, just open for that of the whole thing, except not only a sentence either. Any handshake instead, and we perhaps could meet at the door, for not doing any so either, because if still only that of Intelligence, for also Conscience, it could be still nature, for only purpose and meaning. Just nail it to the point, and perhaps not any soft or sharp either, for the philosophical Argument I perhaps could be making God at best, but not for any excuse either. Rather science at its best for only meaning, and for that just encompass, when we also could be making it angels as well. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe diagram - diaphragm By the way, here the one wearing dark hair, for only Blade Runner for such, and next the end sequence. That one you certainly missed, except not any word for meaning either, when only a couple of phrases. Here not sound, for any speakers connected, so here leaving it to you, for only decide, when also notice. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanic_Verses Not finished yet, because if only idyllic versus barbaric, next it was not what I meant either. Any vice versa you could be making it for only the opposite, and still not any "complementary" either, for just the opposite, when also inverse, just for meaning. Here the author for that above, perhaps of both race and gender for such, except not any inclined attitude for only comment either. Always the little thing you could make it, for also special as well, except not any specialty you could be making it for only creativity itself. So here that of verb, for only verbal at times, except not any verbose either, because even a comment could be a wrong word, for just above. Just throw it instead, and it becomes verbal abuse, for not any slant either, because here I could also swear, except not making it any curse either. Only just a** instead, and you perhaps know what I could mean, when only for the worse, and not any superior either, because here not the ending part. Rather just a clean bill instead, and it becomes that of health, except not any statutory bills or rights you could make it either. Still just throw, and perhaps a discus for such, except not any dirt you could make it either. The Falsification you sometimes could make it, perhaps is not any Doubt either, but should rather be still a Lie. Only a genius instead, and it becomes Einstein for such, if not any Newton either, and for that, also the Laws of physics, we next only could be making it. But next sorry to say, for only making it sane for a couple of people, when not any insanity either, and for that, also respectable. Proving insanity for a caught or imprisoned person, when perhaps only custody, and perhaps also care as well, for not any mental hospital. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychiatry So if still just sticking around, for not any running astray, also A, B, C here for such, when also Sets for making it an aggregated mass, for not any collected either, because still the two other words here as well. You know, for only James Bond, he wanted the drink stirred, but not shaken, except rather the other way around, except not any means we could be making it for science, by only just thinking. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy Just an "Argument" instead, and it perhaps could be better, except not any taught for a lesson either, when still perhaps making it God at times. Do we know that nature could be still for both purpose and meaning, next also a Consequence as well, followed by an act. But if not any attributable, still perhaps for only a meaning, except not any meaning for just science, when we still could only be proving. Rather left to assume instead, for only a given measure, because it could be that of measurability, for just the same. But if rather a rip, or ripple, perhaps only a tore instead, for perhaps the better, except not any sand either, for only a surface. Only torn apart, and it becomes shred into pieces, for only the fragments we could make it, and next not any whole part either. Rather you could be just greedy instead, and grab all the cash. for only leaving other customers astounded. But rather not so, instead, and it could be that of randomness, for also Chaos, when next not of any meaning. Here that of "<>", and for that, the unequal sign, for perhaps not any difference either, because if sometimes a famous Equation, it could also slip and fall, for only respective side. The opposite could perhaps be NOT, for just Logic, except still two different things here, when not any akin either. Any fame you could make it, and perhaps John Travolta only for such, except not any sake for just meaning, when only just science. Einstein perhaps was brillant, for only being a genius, but for that, he also came up with Special relativity, for only a bit hated or disliked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity Here perhaps not any shoulders for such, when not any slippers either, except the other thing or two as well. Only just a sample instead, and it could rather become a distribution, rather than just collecting, when perhaps only just a Consensus for such, because here not so clever, after all. Rather the extremes we could be making it, and also edges as well, when perhaps that of both positive and negative numbers, for only marking their respective end. Here perhaps only the nucleus, except not the atom itself, and here also the Quark, for only the tiny, or minuscule, except not any value or worth, just for science. If perhaps rather the "Alien interview" instead, perhaps still just an "a**" for only a purported meaning, except not any Truth we could be making for it either. Just believe in a couple of Facts, and we also could believe in a story possibly being told. Here it becomes that of a Construct for only a notion, when only that of death, except not any coexistence you could make it for only a single or unilateral part. "In the flesh", and next only a face for such, except not any clay you could be making it, for only just chalky, because rather pockmarked instead. Any Messenger you could make it instead, and perhaps for not any good or bad either, except only for such, when perhaps only being faceless. Could you still make it Divinity for a couple of things, and perhaps at least also Hell as well, for not any moniker it could be, when only just an Allegory. Just noname instead, and you could be still left to speculate, except only making it Matter and Energy, for also gravity, when only a Creation for such. As far as I can tell, a Soul could be just part of my body, for only just invisible, but still waking you up in the morning, for just pricking a little. Here perhaps not any Energy either, but rather Metaphysics instead, which perhaps is not any ghosts either, but rather a substance for just the non-physical. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substance_theory So here perhaps noname of sorts, for only just the Soul, except not any Stairways to Heaven, for next making it God. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel Could we make it still nature only a Construct for such, except not any limitless possibiities for rather a Saint instead, when also angels, except not the infinity we could make it for science, when perhaps not any end in sight? Just past and beyond, and next not any aside, for also perhaps equivalence as well, because here at least equality, for not any juxtaposition either. For that, still the Creation per se, we only could make it, except not any seeing versus believing, we only could make it for perhaps Religion. Just thinking that you could add 1 to just infinity, still perhaps just the same, for not any meaning at all, and it becomes just illusoric. Any interpretation itself, and it should be only that of explaining, except not any certify or assumption for only a given Truth, when perhaps only Certainty. Just a smile, for not any geese either, and at least "=" here, for only a famous Equation, when next making it E=mc2 for such. Just prove for an answer, and perhaps not everything just for it, when it perhaps should rather be complete, next for its meaning. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
I still do have Julie in my friend list here, together with moderator Angela, but not keeping a track of it here, for their postings. Maybe just idyllic here, for not any barbaric either, but here forgot it, for only the rest, because perhaps something else, for what I originally meant. Are here the first word needs to be filled in, for only the second, because it could still be a barbaric world, except not any peace you could make it either. Just silence instead, and it could make you deaf, for perhaps not any other outcome either. Perhaps only "Journey to the end of space", for also "How the Universe works", and still only a couple of videos for such, except not any significant Theories we could be making for the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory Just profound, for that of the previous, and it also became an end sentence for such, except not any prosaic meaning, for only just Lyrics. Only "helter-skelter" instead, and it could become roundabouts, except not any table for only a discussion either. Rather Speculation, and it could end up being speculative, except not any finesse you could make it, for rather just prove, because this is also what science is all about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_star Here not any pocket money either, but rather matter being squeezed together, for only just compressed, when only making it tight as well. Next, hold together, for only a bind, and it becomes the Force of gravity for only doing so, because it could also be a means to attract. But still that better, should also mean clever, except not any superlative you could be making it, for only the greatest. Any materialistic, for only the real world, and it could be hand-picked as well, for only just practical senses or purposes. Just handyman instead, and perhaps not any builder or carpenter either, but rather "jack of all trades". So here the thing we still could measure, for also get, except not any senses for just Belief, when perhaps only Rationality for such, and not any insanity. Do you next think they could be any better than us, and still perhaps only the Universe for both purpose and meaning, except not the same for any aliens. For that, just craftmanship, when also just skills, except not any Scientific method we could use, for only proving a couple of things. A scientist could still perhaps think, except not any allow, for just a presentation, when it should be only a name for such. Assuming that Religion and science could be just two parts of a single whole, it could be also equal, for only a juxtaposition, and not any c.f. here either. Any mutual instead, and it could be two things relating to each other, for only a certain context, so here not the same either. Perhaps only just MAD, for that of mutual assured destruction, and it became the face for such, which should not be any Janus face either. Any superb you could make it, for not any sweet either, and perhaps not any swearing either, except for only a curse. If rather superlative instead, it could be for that of an expressed meaning, except not telling any Truth either. Just proving for a sake, and perhaps we could be doing so, except perhaps not knowing what a sake perhaps means, except not any reason either. Just blame a couple of things instead, and for that, also a Consequence, when it could be an Event possibly happening. Any pick, for just a couple of fingers, and next not any icepick either, but rather a way of measure instead, for making it different types of civilizations, when also levels for such. So here not any slip of a finger, for only the constraint you could be making it, because it could be still limits, for not any thresholds you could be making it either. Just buy a coat instead, and you know it could be expensive, except not any precious, for only a metal instead, like perhaps gold. For that, only just valuable, except not any invaluable you could make it, and for that, only priceless, and next a diamond, when also a necklace. Just shift a little, for only drifting instead, and even DOS could be having this command, except not any phase shift you could be making it either. Any common sense you sometimes could make it, and also a consideration as well, except not any view for only opinion instead. But rather polite instead, and you could be clear and concise for only just meaning, except not any consistency you could make it, for only a written sentence. For that, just literate, except not any any illiterate you could be making it, for only just being dumb. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alphabet I made it Creation per se, for only just in a hurry, when also a thing of the past, for only being mentioned, and therefore only this wording. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hoc If you rather could make it an Implication instead, next also a way for only being thought, except not any lesson or skiil, for just taught either. Exclude any Logic, and it becomes only that above, except not any "meaningful sense" you could make it, for only just concluding a little. Any God you could make it for its meaning, when rather just God for its meaning, and perhaps not any sake either, when it rather could be a purpose instead. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oath_of_allegiance The problem here is that you could still swear, except not any juxtaposition you could be making it for that of the respective, and next thinking that there should be a Creator, for only a Reason behind, when next also God. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation Here for rather the word interpration itself, for only a way we could think, except not any specific meaning, for only a purpose, when it could be that of Quantum mechanics. The "not for any meaning", could be still "for that of meaning", when also just as well, but still only opposite here, when not any inverse either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negation Anyway, just a kiss, and perhaps also a compliment as well, for only making it better, except not any bed either, because rather a complement. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unary Any "grand finale" you could be making it, and perhaps "finissimo" as well, for only the piano, except not any finishing end either, because here not translating for any "sortiment" either. Only just a book, and still chapters for such, except not any paragraphs, for just only sentences, but at least an index, when it also should be an appendix. I still could be able to derive, for only a Conclusion, except not any deviate, for only making it something else, because here also that of a constant. Just agree instead, and it also could be concur as well, except not any Consensus we could be making for science, when only that of extraterrestrials instead. For that, I could end up just bewildered at times, except not any drunk either, for only the beer I could be consuming. Just strange instead, and it could also be rare, except not any weird or odd either, for only that of shape. Only just a couple of "Odd things next flying around", and we perhaps could think that it could be Intelligence as well, except perhaps for only respect with nature. For that, still substance for only meaning, except not any more either, like that of making it provable Facts. Except for not any genius either, I could not be able to surpass my own capabilities, when also abilities for just skill, when also talent for the same. But rather it here, for not making it any personal, when rather nature for a purpose, when it could also be observed. So, except still not any blind eye, for only just spot on, and you would need to be accurate as well, for not any calibrate you could make it either. If still only Julie, for only mentioning her, it also became that of minuscule as well, for only word, and here only spelling first. Feeling good, and next also happy as well, except not any adverse effects you could be making it, for only an outcome. Rather just both, for not any all either, and it could be still everything included, for only comprised, when not any involved either. For only just Creation per se, it also became that of all, for also everything, when only such a thing for being included, and next also a part. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
"Still just an interrogation for only a cross sentencing at times, for only just an answer, except not any written meaning, when also a statement". "Still just an interrogation for only a cross sentencing at times, for only just an answer, except not any written meaning, when also a statement." Removing the Quotes here, for only a waste of space, because here from only a translation being made, for not any Wikipedia either, except not any Questions and Answers either. Read carefully, and next notice the slight difference, for only just wording, when only the punctuation mark at the end. Which one is the correct here, or which one would you rather prefer instead, for that of being used? Suggestions welcome, because this was only meant for earlier on. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block I could be still living in a block of flats, except not any sharp tip of a pencil either, but except not any learn, for only that of skill, perhaps we rather could take it for granted, when only just a Method, for also that of adaptability. Just allegiance and fidelity together, for only the same sentence, and it also could be better. |
|
bluestar Send message Joined: 5 Sep 12 Posts: 4138 Credit: 2,084,789 RAC: 7 |
Yes, slippers, and for that, just eat my shoes instead. Is it still this and that, for also vice versa, when perhaps not any Devil for any Saint we could make it, when also allegiance? Maybe just fidelity for the same, except not any Janus face you could be making it, for only a bit twisted. Here perhaps God for only the neutral, when also that of nickname or moniker as well, except not any Creation for any good or bad, when it should be still only Matter and Energy instead. Guess what, but for only my own inclination and attitude, I could still tend to believe, except only an Agnostic for just the better here. If those things that are, for only existing, still the things that could be or exist, for only that of Existence, because still that for a meaning, and again it fell off. Any tools we could use, and only that of measurability for the same, except not any sake for a reason, when still only just believing. Here perhaps still God, for only presence, when also meaning, when it became that of Creation per se, for only that of result, except still not any Reason behind. Any Black Friday, and perhaps not any Sabbath either, because if only able to conclude, I could be doing so, except only making it a couple of types for that of civilizations, when also that of Intelligence as well. Either I could be told, for only just Fact, or it could still be in the mud, for not any proven, and for that, only "Helter skelter" of sorts, when perhaps not any substance either. Only just relevance at times, and it could be relevant as well, except not thinking that it could be any intelligent life on a nearby star, for only a thing we could be guessing, except not making any given Facts. You see, I could be rather able to fuse, for only merge, I could be still able to produce, except not any conclude, for a valid sentence, when it rather should be a Clause. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotheism This is a thing which I should be taught, and here not necessarily by the church, but rather a lesson being taught, for only teaching a little. Any reason for making it perhaps science instead, and it could be still Proof, when only just science. My guess is that Certainty could be at least for nature, except not any extraterrestrial intelligence for the same, when only just aliens, because both a Sin and a remorse, for also the other word, could still be that of making it God, for only a notion. Therefore, if at least believing, it could be still that of noname, or Faceless coward, here for such, except not any similar attitude I could be making for the same either. Just speak for science, and you should not tell about any Lord either, for only just the Saint, because it could be still only an Argument for such, and not any phrase. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunction Here only just grammar for that above, except not any Logic either, and next the same for other subjects as well, except not any diversity you could make it. Any dependency instead, and it could be that of an interdependency, except not any relation you could make it either. For that, only just independent instead, because it should not be on behalf on another subject, but rather be standing alone. Proving any science, and it could also be a reject, for only a denial, except not any thing you could make it, for only just claiming or pretending. If perhaps so, it reminds me of the scissor here, for only that of cutting and pasting, except not any slicing you could make either. Just purport, and it should not be any purpose, for not translating, except that it sometimes could be confessing, for only stated meaning. Any membrane, for not any skin either, when perhaps rather film, and it could be a layer or interlayer as well, for only separating water and air, and here perhaps not any interleave or Interval for such a thing either. This because it should be still only water here, for only just tight, and next also a concentration for such as well. Any grand, for also gross, and it could be production on a large scale, except not any fabric you could make it, for only fabric of space. Just in the news, and it became that of a signal being found, for only reported, when also detected, and perhaps for that, not necessarily any Proof either, when it rather should be such for science, when only an intended purpose. But if rather making it Evidence instead, and it could be still just Facts, except not the thing we could prove either, when still only just that of science. Just back and forth, for not any sideways either, and it could be still the Interval, for not any separator you could be making it, only because it perhaps could be a sequence, for also more. Just beat me instead, and for that, doing a bit of some harm, except not any unjust or unfair you could be making it for only a lesson, when still not any thought of Logic either. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relational_algebra Perhaps it could be still only a lesson for such, except not any Sin you could make it, because for only that of the church, also a remorse, when not any substitute either. I am not any expert in databases either, but next perhaps only just tell, for that of meaning, when also that of Logic for the same. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getty Next only doing so, for not any getting at either, because here I should not be any talent either, because you rather could put it somewhere instead. Any cleverness instead, and it comes to me that any Religion you could make it, for only worshipping, should not be of any meaning, except rather making it science instead, for only an understanding. Only just inclined instead, and perhaps not any bow, for also bent, when it could rather be for a purpose instead, when still intended meaning. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammar Forgot that one here, for only Syntactics versus Semantics, except still also a Method, for only that of an understanding, when also a Conclusion. Only just reliable instead, and it could also be durable as well, except not any everlasting, and for that, not any reflexes you could make it either. In fact, here I spelt it correct, for not any wrong, and therefore not any cold spell of the weather either, for only a bit of humor. The alternative you rather could make it, for only aliens for short, versus any Monotheism you could make it, perhaps should not be about the Scientific method either, for only its way to explain. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypocrisy Any laughter in the audience, and perhaps it should be lack of Belief instead, for only senses for the same, which perhaps is not any insensitivity either. Any objection instead, for only objectionable Facts, and we could still only rely on a Method for such, when it also could be the Scientific method. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method Come on and have a swim with me, except not making it any secret, for only a city below the ocean, because for that, it should only be a Dream. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nautilus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jules_Verne Here only just different things, for still only objects, except not any attributable, for the Sets you could be making it, and here the word I also could be making it, is just knobbly, for also gnarled. Any fine powder instead, and it could be distributed, for also dispersed, except still not any Sets you could be making it, for also that of the whole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinite_set So, come on and dance, and next only doing it, for not any sweet dreams you could make it, but rather a romance. |
©2020 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.