Time to moderate, perhaps?

Supposedly discoveries goes by their name(s).

Did I perhaps forget something?

Found this video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGSNQfxEGds

Hubble - 15 Years of Discovery (2005)

We should be thankful for the Hubble Space Telescope.

Without it, we would not have known much of what we currently know about distant objects and structures in the universe.

It should rather read as follows:

Supposedly it should rather work out better running the tasks you are having on the current partition instead.

Anyway, besides being occupied by those numbers, I also am having an interest in the universe we are living in and being part of.

The biggest single objects in the universe is the galaxy.

Most galaxies are not on their own. They are part of clusters of galaxies.

Clusters of galaxies, like the local group as well as the Virgo galaxy cluster are again part of superclusters. These structures are the biggest structures known in the universe.

Let us not forget that the Virgo cluster of galaxies is a quite impressive and formidable accumulation of galaxies on its own. It is known to be having some 3000 individual galaxies. Whether or not the local group of galaxies is belonging to the Virgo cluster is probably an open question.

If someone are able to provide an answer to this question, I would be grateful.

The Virgo cluster as well as the more remote Coma cluster of galaxies are supposed to be more or less such a supercluster. A similar accumulation of galaxies, even more remote is being found in the constellation Corona Borealis.

What follows next?

If you happen to be an astronomer, the Abell designation representing clusters of galaxies is one way of collecting such information. Another structure is the Sloan Great Wall, which is supposed to be a supercluster of galaxies.

So the question becomes next - how many superclusters of galaxies are there?

If the answer to this question is known, in which way does these superclusters possibly relate to each other and maybe even being part of an even larger, still unknown complete universal structure?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5vOU6-1yNZs

Also you may be able to run two or more instances of the BOINC Manager from within the Manager itself.

Really I have not tried out this very much, but a quick test using 7.2.28(x64) makes this possible from the "Advanced" option on the menu. For now I only pressed OK without specifying any hostname or password.

Possibly you may be able to run possible different versions of the Manager across several discs and partitions, but needless to say this should not be necessary most of the time.

Supposedly it rather should work out better running the tasks you are having on the current partition instead.

Also I notice that you need to exit a second (or more instance) of the Manager in the same way you are supposed to exit the one you are mostly using. Closing the windows you may have (including the Event Log) does not shut down any secondary instance of the Manager in the same way.

In for a ride?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo9EQ6mIhRY

This video gives a quite impressive journey to the end of the known universe.

Speaking of science.

Ridiculous time...

Nonsense!

Oh, tried posting this first from my bluestar account, but apparently no so (RAC - not total credit).

Is the wish for E.T. just speculative thinking or possibly a dream of sorts?

One of the most important periods of your life is your childhood.

This is the period of your time when you are supposed to learn everything you will need to know when becoming an adult.

Is there a possibility that sometimes you keep a memory from your childhood and want this to be a dream that is supposed to be true?

We all happen to know about E.T. the movie. The little boy was able to get a ride, on his bike, together with his visitor from space.

All of this stuff very suitable for our beloved Dan Werthimer, who like Seth Shoestak happen to be such innocent and nice people.

(By the way - is it Shostak or Shoestak? Just a polite question for you).

You may remember Carl Sagan from the Cosmos episode series. I have not been able to watch anything of this on YouTube and therefore am unaware of any such material.

But I remember from one of the episodes of the series that they were able to place one of the Viking landers quite out in the desert and make a small presentation of it. This to show that he in fact really was a planetary scientist and not only some gooble-wooble who was paid to speak some nice words about facts and knowledge regarding the subject of science.

One of his books, "Contact", right now lies in my living room. I was able to get it from my parents. Unfortunately I have not taken time at reading it yet, because what I am doing right here unfortunately puts my books away.

But if I am not wrong, it is once again science being presented in an easy way (really, it has become "popularized" in order for its readers being able to understand its contents and meaning).

That's true James. We experience reality in our own way, without understanding what's behind everything but unconsciously we know more than we either admit or realize.

[edit] Forget the admit part, that wouldn't stroke with the unconsciousness part.

---

rOZZ
Music
Pictures

The problem is we humans tend to think of the 3rd and 4th dimensions as separate. Instead think of them as intertwined.
In my Astronomy magazine, A scientist stated that we humans unknowingly use both with out realizeing it.

Tbhink of it this way. If you said I will meet you at Joes Bar later. I would ask at what time. There is the Time and Space.
At least thats what I think he was trying to point out.

---

[/quote]

Old James

Came across a PRP1073 today.

I just read the thread "How do you measure time in space?" in the Science (non-SETI) message board.

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=74455

Here is the point, or catch regarding all of this.

Physicists and mathematicians, as well as astronomers, of course, are trying to explain the notion of time.

We assume time to be the fourth dimension, of which the point (or singularity), as well as line, square and cube are typical representations of the first three dimensions. The point or singularity possibly could be regarded as being a
1/~ dimension or abstract when it comes to a mathematical explanation.

This is the world we are supposed to be living in.

Some people are speaking of a possible 11 dimensions being present in nature, implying that the combination of space and time constitutes 8 of these dimensions.

There may possibly be some YouTube videos for this available, but right now I do not have any links.

Also, I mentioned a web-link for a web-page on Wikipedia giving a description of how the different elementary particles is supposed to be related in order to each other.

Meaning that on one hand we are having elementary particles constituting the building blocks of nature, including mass.

On the other hand, we also have the mentioned 3 + 8 dimensions which possibly could be explained more precisely and detailed by means of the use of mathematics.

In which way are physicists able to merge or unite these two principles (that is dimensions vs. elementary particles)?

Thank you very much for any explanation that you may be able to provide!

Please let me correct myself.

Apparently 2409664^8192+1 is not a prime number. But still not too bad an accomplishment.

Or better said (I have not started up my day right yet) the following:

These numbers should be treated with respect and dignity by all known civilizations.

Also check out http://factordb.com/index.php

Or, to be more precise:

http://factordb.com/index.php?query=2891508%5E4096%2B1

This number now became a probable prime (PRP).

One question is whether or not it is possible to run those Seti@home tasks which are CUDA-based without even putting them on hold while using the Yafu software for factorizing those numbers.

The PrimeGrid Prime Sierpinski tasks become "Waiting to Run" if more than two Yafu tasks are running at the same time. Similarly, the WinPFGW (preferably 64 bits for 32 bits) appears to be running all the time, at least when running hidden away and only available when using the arrow up at the lower right and double-clicking the Application.

Any suggestions for better performance?

By the way, I am right now using the "Optimal" BIOS setting for slightly better performance. The other two are "Normal" and "Power Saving".

Speaking of making blunders.

Regarding my second interest, namely prime numbers.

In my downloads folder, I came across a text file with the name of verif.

It lists the following numbers:

9999924^32+1 , 9999822^64+1 , 8999972^128+1 , 6999734^256+1, 5998582^512+1,
4999612^1024+1 , 3998328^2048+1, 2891508^4096+1, 2409664^8192+1, 1915122^16384+1, 2034902^32768+1

I extracted these numbers and checked them against the Factor Database.

Apparently I was able to add to the file itself before making a copy of it to My Documents as I should have done. It only changes the date and time stamp of the file when adding contents to it, however.

To my surprise some of the smaller numbers were not listed as the should have been. A couple of other ones, including some of the larger ones were already listed.

For now, the first eight of these numbers are in fact prime numbers, but right now the 2891508^4096+1 still is listed as "U" or unknown in the Factor Database. Working on it right now in order to get a possible factorization. It takes quite a lot of time. Apparently this number is a prime number having some 26465 digits.

If it is supposed to be some kind of competition when it comes to the discovery of these numbers being prime, the question then becomes whether or not it is possible to try making a better effort at displaying these result whenever they are available, at least publicly.

Better make use of WinPFGW for the remaining numbers. It takes much less time to get a result doing it this way.

By the way, I am able to see that there is room for one more number on the first line, but the message composer breaks the line when adding a ",".

Anyway, starting out with 4999612^1024+1 as the first number for testing using WinPFGW64 and including the five remaining numbers as well, all these numbers apparently are prime or probable primes (3-PRP).

These numbers should be treated with respect by all known civilizations.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSSfrIFmk84

At 4:12 and following.

Correct. She is not making a fool out of you.

Wait to tomorrow and you will be able to see her.

Blond legs? Hm...

---

rOZZ
Music
Pictures

Shakira?

With her blond legs.

Oh, she is not the 200.65 triplet.

Oh, just another example of stupid women.

If you did not already know, it is all about "tornado videos".

She is probably living in Tennessee, U.S. and for some reason she chooses to wait at the door. At some time it starts blowing and a male starts shutting the windows.

The question becomes - is it all about natural surplus when it comes to possible behavior?

What is the intention (if any) for this video?

Apparently a yellow shirt visible as well as a couple of legs standing in between.

Please define a "nice lady" for me in the same context, will you.

Always blame nature for strange incidences (or coincidences).

Related video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x602M-h9q5k

Apparently lost the window, but found it once again.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x602M-h9q5k