The James Webb Space Telescope

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The James Webb Space Telescope
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Stargate (SA)
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Mar 10
Posts: 1854
Credit: 2,258,721
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1945505 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 5:26:27 UTC

I'd like to see them shipping it to the ISS and testing on a smaller scale, then attaching main sale to craft if all works ok..
ID: 1945505 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Stargate (SA)
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Mar 10
Posts: 1854
Credit: 2,258,721
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1945520 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 8:18:00 UTC - in response to Message 1945513.  

IIRC one of the biggest problems is the funding was cut to near zero one year. People have to have food on the table. Not everyone could wait around a year to be brought back on the project.

There seem to be two big issues left. The first seems to be some sort of engineering and building screw up at NGAS on the propulsion system. That isn't being talked about. If they have identified it they will fix it.
The second seems to be the sun shield. Never flown before. Seems like they tried something and it didn't test okay. Rinse and Repeat. Does not give good confidence all the problems are out.

It seems to be an issue to unfold and unfurl things in space. Skylab, ISS, Light Sail, there is a list of failures of those kinds of operations. We don't have zero g test facility for those.


If the launch of the telescope is postponed for 3 years, then this indicates that there are fundamental problems.
Disclosure of the solar shield is not a fundamental problem. Disclosure of the design in space has long been worked out and with this there are no problems.
The telescope has 18 independent mirrors, which must be controlled and must be self-tuning.
Probably, when testing the telescope, theoretical calculations were not achieved. The telescope did not give positive results. I mean the mirror. Each mirror has its own control and adjustment system.
Mirror is the most important thing that is in the telescope and if they do not work, then the telescope is useless.

3 years is a long time, for small problems.



A meer spec in human time
ID: 1945520 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22190
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1945521 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 8:19:50 UTC

The "tuning" of multiple mirrors for large telescopes has been around for a few years now, and is approaching a "mature" technology. However the solar shield is something new, not in concept but in the way it is folded and packed for launch - think of origami on a giant scale. A bit more or less friction in one of the hinges and the thing won't unfold properly. so the whole thing has to be taken to bits again, re-worked, re-tested, then re-integrated with the rest of the telescope, the telescope re-tested....
Also reported earlier in this thread there are reports that there are (or have been) issues with one of the propulsion/positioning modules - which are sort of essential for making sure the telescope is where it should be and pointing in the right direction. Again lots of time required to sort that out (basically the same process needed as that for the Sun shield.
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1945521 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Stargate (SA)
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Mar 10
Posts: 1854
Credit: 2,258,721
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1945523 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 8:28:12 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jul 2018, 8:30:30 UTC

Amazing Russian Scientist who sits on own hands tells all what where doing wrong, while NASA and others search the cosmos, Russian Scientist Vadim Rybin tells all..
ID: 1945523 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1945526 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 9:03:30 UTC - in response to Message 1945523.  

Amazing Russian Scientist who sits on own hands tells all what where doing wrong, while NASA and others search the cosmos, Russian Scientist Vadim Rybin tells all..

He's merely espousing very Russian biased opinions and points of view. Very few of if any I agree with but like all other members here, as long as he stays within the rules that's his prerogative . Ain't gonna make many friends or win over the rest of us to his unique point of view but I enjoy reading some of his comments.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1945526 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Stargate (SA)
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Mar 10
Posts: 1854
Credit: 2,258,721
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 1945527 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 9:06:54 UTC

When Russia can send spacecraft like NASA, Space X, Blue Origin and others with scientific stuff that can help all (Other than Boast there new weapons and some have failed) until then, they should remain silent..
ID: 1945527 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Bob DeWoody
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 May 10
Posts: 3387
Credit: 4,182,900
RAC: 10
United States
Message 1945531 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 10:06:37 UTC

Vadim, you seem to forget that the major portion of the ISS was delivered into orbit by the US space shuttle, now retired. I think it was a mistake to retire it before it's replacement was ready but I'm not in charge. Pretty soon though the rest of the world's countries with astronauts won't be having to pay Russia for a ride to the ISS.
Bob DeWoody

My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events.
ID: 1945531 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1945588 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 17:42:48 UTC - in response to Message 1945525.  

For example, the telescope "Kepler" failed because of the positioning system.

Yes, after its design lifetime had been exceeded. Also note Kepler was built as a cheap mission.

Same type of system, reaction control wheel, has failed on every spacecraft it is on including the ISS. Humans can't make bearings and electric motors that last forever.
ID: 1945588 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gordon Lowe
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 5 Nov 00
Posts: 12094
Credit: 6,317,865
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1945604 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 18:57:47 UTC - in response to Message 1945592.  

Perhaps in James Webb, a modular assembly is used and there will be the possibility of replacing the positioning system and other systems.

The James Webb's location in space will be too far out to allow maintenance.
The mind is a weird and mysterious place
ID: 1945604 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
rob smith Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 03
Posts: 22190
Credit: 416,307,556
RAC: 380
United Kingdom
Message 1945619 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 20:11:54 UTC

Kepler is a modular system, just not one designed for maintenance. One problem, as I understand, is that the modules that are failing are actually buried deep within the craft - they have to be close to its "centre of gravity" to work properly. Additionally the craft is running out of fuel for maneuvering, and refueling a spacecraft is somewhat more complex than filling up one's car.
Much the same applies to the JWT - fuel will be one of the biggest determining factors on its life, other components will be degraded by the continuous exposure to solar radiation, micro-meteors and "space debris".
Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?
ID: 1945619 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1982593 - Posted: 28 Feb 2019, 11:36:55 UTC

ID: 1982593 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Lynn Special Project $75 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Nov 00
Posts: 14162
Credit: 79,603,650
RAC: 123
United States
Message 1983060 - Posted: 2 Mar 2019, 1:29:26 UTC - in response to Message 1982627.  

Money helps build telescopes.
ID: 1983060 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1983131 - Posted: 3 Mar 2019, 14:28:51 UTC

There is a simple test to detect spherical aberrations, the Ronchi test, which needs only a candle and a knife. Probably the builders of the optical section did not know it, or they thought it was old stuff.
Tukllio
ID: 1983131 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 30640
Credit: 53,134,872
RAC: 32
United States
Message 1983150 - Posted: 3 Mar 2019, 15:53:03 UTC - in response to Message 1983131.  

There is a simple test to detect spherical aberrations, the Ronchi test, which needs only a candle and a knife. Probably the builders of the optical section did not know it, or they thought it was old stuff.
Tukllio

They knew it, they just thought their tests covered it, they didn't.
ID: 1983150 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1983171 - Posted: 3 Mar 2019, 17:19:21 UTC

He who pays the piper calls the tunes.
Tullio
ID: 1983171 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1983366 - Posted: 4 Mar 2019, 11:53:03 UTC

I think there is a way to present an astronomy project and ask for time on a telescope. Astronomers are kind people and will consider your request as far as possible.
Tullio
ID: 1983366 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Mert Paksoy Project Donor

Send message
Joined: 5 Jun 99
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,048,963
RAC: 1
Turkey
Message 1983505 - Posted: 5 Mar 2019, 3:07:08 UTC

Lets NOT forget that it's really hard to listen radio waves even from our solar system. No 4k pics from Mars any time soon.
ID: 1983505 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
moomin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 17
Posts: 6204
Credit: 38,420
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 1983705 - Posted: 7 Mar 2019, 0:08:19 UTC

Why is the James Webb Space Telescope taking so long?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8yRDrl76d0
ID: 1983705 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Julie
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Oct 09
Posts: 34053
Credit: 18,883,157
RAC: 18
Belgium
Message 1986552 - Posted: 22 Mar 2019, 13:02:52 UTC

I also think they keep on postponing it because they cannot say goodbye to the Hubble. The Hubble will be sorely missed once it's gone.
rOZZ
Music
Pictures
ID: 1986552 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile tullio
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 04
Posts: 8797
Credit: 2,930,782
RAC: 1
Italy
Message 1986619 - Posted: 22 Mar 2019, 18:43:35 UTC

Hubble receives visible light, Webb should cover the IR range, hence it must be cooled.
Tullio
ID: 1986619 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · Next

Message boards : Science (non-SETI) : The James Webb Space Telescope


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.