The data is realy flowing again but still receiving the wrong cuda version in some hosts. Did anyone else have the same problem?

let's analyse a specific host Juan ? which host(s) ? (maybe start a thread for it)

Sorry, i was sleeping.... here some examples: (all runs V7 from the begining)

This host is a 590+2x580: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/host_app_versions.php?hostid=5264653

it receives only cuda50, expected cuda42 since all the GPUs are Fermis.

This is a 690+670 host: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=6690764

it still receive cuda32 (few WU something like 1 in 10 the rest are cuda50) , expected cuda50 since all the GPUs are kepplers.

All GPUs are running at stock speeds and the keplers are EVGA Classified/FTW.

I will check my others hosts for any anormalities.

Hope that helps to clarify what i try show. I´m still thinking the old way, where we choose the best apps is better.

---

Thanks, having a look with first example first. Will start a new thread

---

"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.

That's interesting... tasks page and wuID page shows credit is pending.. but taskID page shows [claimed...?] credit with a validate state of 'initial'.

Unless my wingmate reports before anyone reads this..

task 3011463763
workunit 1251615664

I see that same scenario for one other task, too. What seemed like probably about 10-12 hours ago, credit on the taskID was showing 0.00 if it was pending. What changed since then?


edit: or how about this one? workunit 1250118735
_0 had an error while computing but was given credit, _1 (me) is pending, and now I'm waiting for _2 to return it. *scratches head*

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

Say is anyone getting any cpu wu's?

I don't have any errors in the app info file, state or otherwise, I've got cpu and both v6 and v7 checked, yet no cpu wu's, I've got plenty of gpu wu's of course.

---

Savoir-Faire is everywhere!
The T1 Trust, T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, America's First HST

Say is anyone getting any cpu wu's?

Just installed Lunatics optimised, so i won't be getting any work till the time to completion settles back down.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

Say is anyone getting any cpu wu's?

Just installed Lunatics optimised, so i won't be getting any work till the time to completion settles back down.

I finally got 11 cpu wu's, after a bit.

---

Savoir-Faire is everywhere!
The T1 Trust, T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, America's First HST

Lower credit, over the top time estimates since installing the new optimised application, and now i'm getting sticky downloads. Multiple re-tries & they're still there.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

Same here Grant & for my team too...
Before 575KC / On stage 476KC

---

Don't know if they did some server tweaking during the outage- if they did i hope they undo it ASAP.
All downloads are sitting there for several minutes before they start to download. When they do start to download they timeout while doing so. It's taking multiple re-tries to download each WU, and the download rates have gone from 120kB/s down to less than 10kB/s.

---

Grant
Darwin NT

Looks like we're back to the dreaded "transient HTTP error". Guess something on the backend side went "ka-put".


6/4/2013 2:19:14 PM | SETI@home | Started download of 21fe09ac.5884.5810.11.12.250
6/4/2013 2:19:14 PM | SETI@home | Started download of 21fe09ac.5884.5810.11.12.253
6/4/2013 2:19:16 PM | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
6/4/2013 2:19:58 PM | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
6/4/2013 2:19:58 PM | SETI@home | Temporarily failed download of 21fe09ac.5884.5810.11.12.250: transient HTTP error
6/4/2013 2:19:58 PM | SETI@home | Backing off 40 min 35 sec on download of 21fe09ac.5884.5810.11.12.250
6/4/2013 2:19:59 PM | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.
6/4/2013 2:21:19 PM | | Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
6/4/2013 2:21:19 PM | SETI@home | Temporarily failed download of 21fe09ac.5884.5810.11.12.253: transient HTTP error
6/4/2013 2:21:19 PM | SETI@home | Backing off 52 min 9 sec on download of 21fe09ac.5884.5810.11.12.253
6/4/2013 2:21:20 PM | | Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down.

---

There must be something the servers didn't like about me installing MB v7. My Laptop is down to 0 tasks per day for v7 after just receiving it's first v7 WU, my desktop is down to 33 per day. Both computers have not returned any results for v7... have I done something wrong? Or have the servers done something wrong?

I mean, it's not an issue with 33 tasks per day, but 0 per day means actually, that this machine should never get any task for this application... that would be somehow disappointing...

---

I gather the laptop is the one with the (forgive the experssion) "m processor".

Did you load v7 standard or lunatics 0.41.

---

Just for clarification - Is it just me, or does it seem like these v7 WU's take longer to crunch?

---

Just for clarification - Is it just me, or does it seem like these v7 WU's take longer to crunch?

They do take longer to crunch as they have additional items to search for.

---

Same here samten

---

Both of you are not imagining it. As per Arkayn, v7 WUs take longer to crunch so you will do fewer WUs per day compared to v6 (albiet more processing in v7 compared to v6).

There will also an effect on your daily total.

---

I gather the laptop is the one with the (forgive the experssion) "m processor".

Did you load v7 standard or lunatics 0.41.

I installed the v7 app manually, the X2 has already started it's first WU, runs OK so far. None of those machines have ever returned any MB v7 result, so I don't understand why their quotas are that low, for all other applications they started at 100.

---

There must be something the servers didn't like about me installing MB v7. My Laptop is down to 0 tasks per day for v7 after just receiving it's first v7 WU, my desktop is down to 33 per day. Both computers have not returned any results for v7... have I done something wrong? Or have the servers done something wrong?

Those stats are reset at migdnight Berkeley time each day.
With the increadibly long runtimes with the v7 stock application i was only returning about 7 per day on my slow machine.
The important numbers are the "Max tasks per day" and "Consecutive valid tasks".

As of a couple of minutes ago, for my slow system-
Number of tasks completed 415
Max tasks per day 544
Number of tasks today 0
Consecutive valid tasks 444
Average processing rate 193.67956428601
Average turnaround time 0.87 days

---

Grant
Darwin NT

There must be something the servers didn't like about me installing MB v7. My Laptop is down to 0 tasks per day for v7 after just receiving it's first v7 WU, my desktop is down to 33 per day. Both computers have not returned any results for v7... have I done something wrong? Or have the servers done something wrong?

(...)
The important numbers are the "Max tasks per day" and "Consecutive valid tasks".

I'm talking about max tasks per day. That's 0 for my laptop and (now after returning 1 valid result) 34 for my desktop.

---

I'm talking about max tasks per day. That's 0 for my laptop and (now after returning 1 valid result) 34 for my desktop.

Ah.

---

Grant
Darwin NT