Hi, Trader.
This is the thread you wanted.












LOL, LOL, LOL!

Hiyah sarge.

"The Marble Thinker" by me sometime in Fall 1994 or Winter 1994/1995.

From one of your early posts in this tread. And one of my favourite "shades of Rodin" songs of yours.

Rodin?

Hiyah sarge.

"The Marble Thinker" by me sometime in Fall 1994 or Winter 1994/1995.

From one of your early posts in this tread. And one of my favourite "shades of Rodin" songs of yours.

Please implode and get it over with.. so we can get back to reasonable discussions.

This thread has been around for months.
You did not recognize the satiric title compared to another? If not, I am very disappointed.

i have advocated for many years a none of the above slot on ballets.

Nice Freudian slip given your avatar of Dancer42 :-))

so we can get back to reasonable discussions.

Janice, this is Seti Politics, the day that happens Suidae will take to aviation!!

Please implode and get it over with.. so we can get back to reasonable discussions.

---

Janice

i have advocated for many years a none of the above slot on ballets.

if none of the above wins all party's must place new candidates and run a vary short campaign then another vote.

if none of the above wins again any who wish to run can without party affiliations.

---

Whichever of them might might have won, you can't run a country with 1/3 of the people being pissed off. No wonder there is so much unrest in America.

Vote NONE OF THE A$$E$ BELOW! the only reasonable candidate.

That would be nice.
But ...
any Libertarian candidate that makes it on the ballot would be one those to which you refer. If this person's "brand" of Libertarian matches yours fairly well, would you still use that option?

In well over 90% of the contests on my recent ballots they have not even had a candidate in a contest.

---

Whichever of them might might have won, you can't run a country with 1/3 of the people being pissed off. No wonder there is so much unrest in America.

Vote NONE OF THE A$$E$ BELOW! the only reasonable candidate.

That would be nice.
But ...
any Libertarian candidate that makes it on the ballot would be one those to which you refer. If this person's "brand" of Libertarian matches yours fairly well, would you still use that option?

Whichever of them might might have won, you can't run a country with 1/3 of the people being pissed off. No wonder there is so much unrest in America.

Vote NONE OF THE A$$E$ BELOW! the only reasonable candidate.

---

Pres is bad. Really really bad. We're lost. Time to implode!

In the last election 1/3 of Americans chose not to vote. Of those that did, it was 50/50 between Obama and Romney. The Electoral College decided who would win, but they are clearly not representative of the people, or the popular vote.

Whichever of them might might have won, you can't run a country with 1/3 of the people being pissed off. No wonder there is so much unrest in America.

well the government may be headed in the wrong direction, this does not mean that

you have to.

---

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/19-11-2012/122849-obama_soviet_mistake-0/

Makes one wonder if Obama feels devastated at being called a communist in an opinion piece for the online edition of a Russian newspaper.

Recently, Obama has been re-elected for a 2nd term by an illiterate society and he is ready to continue his lies of less taxes while he raises them. He gives speeches of peace and love in the world while he promotes wars as he did in Egypt, Libya and Syria. He plans his next war is with Iran as he fires or demotes his generals who get in the way.

There is no Izvestia in Pravda and no Pravda in Izvestia.

Judging by the piece I'd say there's no правда in Pravda.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/19-11-2012/122849-obama_soviet_mistake-0/

Makes one wonder if Obama feels devastated at being called a communist in an opinion piece for the online edition of a Russian newspaper.

Recently, Obama has been re-elected for a 2nd term by an illiterate society and he is ready to continue his lies of less taxes while he raises them. He gives speeches of peace and love in the world while he promotes wars as he did in Egypt, Libya and Syria. He plans his next war is with Iran as he fires or demotes his generals who get in the way.

There is no Izvestia in Pravda and no Pravda in Izvestia.

---

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/19-11-2012/122849-obama_soviet_mistake-0/

Makes one wonder if Obama feels devastated at being called a communist in an opinion piece for the online edition of a Russian newspaper.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Hi Sarge! I ain't half glad I live in England!

Tootle pip old chap!

COINCIDENCE?? OBAMA LOSES IN EVERY STATE REQUIRING PHOTO IDS

The liberal trolls are out in full force on this page. Once idenified they are immediatedly dismissed.

To those who read this I would but ask, "What are you doing here?" Should
n't you "compassionate ones," be busy today working out that "Hope, and Change?"

One such deluded soul just posted this; "Just face it Liberals outnumber you?" My reply before sending him out the door; "If you are so condident in this assertion why then are you afraid of photo id requirements?"

Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed. Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.

Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.

Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

Really? "OBAMA LOSES IN EVERY STATE REQUIRING PHOTO IDS" Really?

http://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/vote/acceptableFormsOfID.html

CO is shown in blue, meaning Obama won CO.

[snipped CO law]

Logic and proof: frustrating extremists since Euclid.

Florida, NH, and Michigan (states that Obama won) have "non-strict" requirements for photo id, the difference between strict and non-strict photo id requirements is in the counting of provisional ballots, "strict" means the voter has to return within some period to show their valid id, "non-strict" means the state may use some other means to assess the validity of the provisional ballot (e.g. in Florida a comparison with the signature on record may suffice). There were only 4 states that had strict photo id laws in place, and Romney won them all.

I find it interesting that the legend says "States that request photo ID", whereas the NCSL terms them "non-strict".

Also, according toe the NCSL there are strict non-photo ID states, Arizona, Ohio and Virginia, Obama won two of them.

The title "Obama loses every state requiring photo id" while true ... (see my sig)

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

Item 15
You will use the proper tea which is Earl Grey.

What?! It isn't tea-publican?!! Wait till the NRA hears about this!!

Now we've got someone saying NASA "didn't build that"! Apollo 17 "On The Shoulders of Giants" - NASA Space Program & Moon. Quit quoting that liberal, Sir Isaac Newton.