留言板 :
Politics :
Neither side can handle the truth. That's why they don't talk about it.
留言板合理
| 作者 | 消息 |
|---|---|
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
Riiiiiight. Like you, and all the others, not staying on topic because you can't handle the truth can and should be labled as Intellectual Dishonesty. Got to have your over budget spending so you all wish to change the subject. Riiiiiiiiight. |
Gary Charpentier ![]() 发送消息 已加入:25 Dec 00 贴子:27228 积分:53,134,872 近期平均积分:32
|
That's quire coarse and not even remotely funny ID .... Speaks volumes about the person.
|
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
That's quire coarse and not even remotely funny ID .... So is the baiting... Nor was there cussing. Nor was any rules broken. Nor was I trying to be funny. |
Gone with the wind ![]() 发送消息 已加入:19 Nov 00 贴子:41732 积分:42,645,437 近期平均积分:42 |
That's quire coarse and not even remotely funny ID .... |
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
Let's do a science experiment... Squat down, place the left hand place under your rearend. Hold out the right hand in front of you. The left hand is for defecation, the right is for wanting. Do this ten times, then switch hands and repeat another ten times. What hand was filled first? Then please by all means, give us the results. |
|
bobby "snowflake" 发送消息 已加入:22 Mar 02 贴子:2866 积分:17,789,109 近期平均积分:3
|
ID, we is at least Gary and me. Please provide an answer to the question "Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?" I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...
|
Gary Charpentier ![]() 发送消息 已加入:25 Dec 00 贴子:27228 积分:53,134,872 近期平均积分:32
|
NONE of what you have said is true. I honestly believe that you are a conspiracy theorist based on the posts I've seen. I do not state that it is fact. If you chose to see yourself in the other comments in my post, which were not directed at you but at unspecified others, I can do nothing about that. I might take umbrage in your statement, essentially saying everything I utter is false, but I consider the source.
|
betreger ![]() 发送消息 已加入:29 Jun 99 贴子:10354 积分:29,581,041 近期平均积分:66
|
So your excursion off topic does not make you a hypocrite? |
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
ID, we is at least Gary and me. The RELATED topic was destruction of the dollar, there are other charges. |
betreger ![]() 发送消息 已加入:29 Jun 99 贴子:10354 积分:29,581,041 近期平均积分:66
|
ID, we is at least Gary and me. ID since you brought up Benghazi, how does that relate to the fiscal matters? I know when one gets excited sometimes they go off topic. |
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
I do believe that I still have the right to express my views. I'm not 100% sure but I think that was pointed at me, not you. Hang on Im sure it will be cleared up soon... |
kittyman ![]() 发送消息 已加入:9 Jul 00 贴子:50498 积分:1,018,363,574 近期平均积分:1,004
|
I do believe that I still have the right to express my views. Even though some of you may consider them a bit 'twisted' at times. And I'll grant you, I do get 'out there' from time to time. I did not threaten the President. I simply said that I would not be overly saddened if something might happen. I was deeply and forever impacted when Kennedy was assassinated. I am sure some would feel the same for Obama. But, he never will be in the same class as Kennedy. Or respected by as many. He just does not have that honesty. "Learn from yesterday. Live for today. Hope for tomorrow." Albert Einstein "With cats." kittyman
|
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
ID, we is at least Gary and me. The subject isn't about me. The subject is about fiscal matters. Self edit your post or I'll red x it because you are getting WAY too personal. You don't know me nor are you a doctor of the mind. NONE of what you have said is true. |
Gary Charpentier ![]() 发送消息 已加入:25 Dec 00 贴子:27228 积分:53,134,872 近期平均积分:32
|
ID, we is at least Gary and me. We. I suspect there are a few others too. Missed his birther inference on the first read, but that just confirms that he is a conspiracy theorist. As to a mental disconnect, most people have several. If they are aware of them it isn't usually a big issue. I more worry about the people who can't see them even with they are in their face. People like that may suddenly change the subject rather than face the reality in front of them because it is too painful to admit or may strike out irrationally in an attempt to get it to go away.
|
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
There ARE two sets of laws........ It seems like in the end if the rules are followed to the LETTER of THE LAW things in the end will get better. There cannot be two sets of laws. Once THE PEOPLE understand this and DEMAND that the law be followed in the end things will get better. Can this be done before the fall? I don't know? Wish I did. |
|
bobby "snowflake" 发送消息 已加入:22 Mar 02 贴子:2866 积分:17,789,109 近期平均积分:3
|
I do believe Hussein has broken laws to get to where he is. Several misdemeanors I'm sure and perhaps some low grade felonies. Nothing that would make him eligible for capital punishment. Frankly he would likely be eligible for probation or at the most house arrest. Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1? I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...
|
Gary Charpentier ![]() 发送消息 已加入:25 Dec 00 贴子:27228 积分:53,134,872 近期平均积分:32
|
Benghazi Ah, so you are a conspiracy theorist. That explains a lot. Now if you had set your sights on a bureaucrat in the state department you might actually be right. However you will need to have hard evidence that it is simply more than dereliction of duty, see Cramer v. United States - 325 U.S. 1 (1945).
|
kittyman ![]() 发送消息 已加入:9 Jul 00 贴子:50498 积分:1,018,363,574 近期平均积分:1,004
|
There ARE two sets of laws........ I did. Long and hard. You? "Learn from yesterday. Live for today. Hope for tomorrow." Albert Einstein "With cats." kittyman
|
Intelligent Design 发送消息 已加入:9 Apr 12 贴子:3626 积分:37,520 近期平均积分:0
|
There ARE two sets of laws........ Why is that? Think before you post... |
kittyman ![]() 发送消息 已加入:9 Jul 00 贴子:50498 积分:1,018,363,574 近期平均积分:1,004
|
There ARE two sets of laws........ One for the populace, and another for those in congress who deem themselves above the populace. The two are distinctly different. By that, I mean the laws. Or, I can mean the two sets of people who some decide what is better for us than it is for them. "Learn from yesterday. Live for today. Hope for tomorrow." Albert Einstein "With cats." kittyman
|
©2020 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.