ID, you brought up Sheriff Joe Arpaio as your source of the evidence the Obamma has a forged birth certificate. I find that to be a very suspect source of facts. I know about 20 or more years about reality than you do. With experience can come knowledge, I know I have profited.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio had a task-force look into this. You smarter then them? You got 20 years on Sheriff Joe? Are you a Sheriff, JAG Officer, or lawyer?

ID, you brought up Sheriff Joe Arpaio as your source of the evidence the Obamma has a forged birth certificate. I find that to be a very suspect source of facts. I know about 20 or more years about reality than you do. With experience can come knowledge, I know I have profited.

---

ID, you cite evidence from Sheriff Joe Arpaio. You have a warped sense of humor or reality.

Are you a Sheriff? And what would you know about reality?

ID, you cite evidence from Sheriff Joe Arpaio. You have a warped sense of humor or reality.

---

Yes. I don't believe he is eligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution.

I read it. Consider the source...

Only regurgitating a story that had been around since March.

And just like a good lap dog; I didn't have to clean it up...

Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

I read it. Consider the source...

Only regurgitating a story that had been around since March.

And just like a good lap dog; I didn't have to clean it up...

I read it. Consider the source...

Only regurgitating a story that had been around since March.

I read it. Consider the source...

It's 50% better too. LOL!

Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio

You didn't read the last line.

But sometimes in politics, the only thing to do with a dead horse is to beat it.

It's 50% better too. LOL!

Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Do you (not the Maricopa County, Arizona sheriff) believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

It's 50% better too. LOL!

The NY Times might not agree. Going Abroad to Find Affordable Health Care

It's 50% better too. LOL!

Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio

It's 50% better too. LOL!

Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

It's 50% better too. LOL!

Consider that in the civilized world, single payer systems prevail for health care -- and the costs are as you noted 1/3 less than in the US (or health care in the US costs 50% more) with equal results. So instead of advocating more private pay -- which is the difference between the US and other countries -- how about advocating for LESS private pay to match the efficiency of the civilized world.

Fed funding of Health care?

As the basically insurance funded Health Service in the USA costs 50% or more than the health care in other industrial countries, isn't a least worth a thought?

Bobby, you should know by now that ID is not fact driven, he is faith driven -- questions based on fact don't get responses -- there is no common language.

I do believe Hussein has broken laws to get to where he is. Several misdemeanors I'm sure and perhaps some low grade felonies. Nothing that would make him eligible for capital punishment. Frankly he would likely be eligible for probation or at the most house arrest.

Article. II.
Section. 1.
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?

OT] If I read this right, a president need not be born in the US, but only be a citizen?? I was taught by them gubment schoolz that you had to be BORN here.

In a couple years I can run for president, whatdoya think Guy?

Article II, Section 4 is usually interpreted effectively as "A natural born citizen or a citizen in 1788" (year may be different depending on the state you were born in). A natural born citizen may be born overseas (e.g. McCain).

Still waiting for ID to answer the question "Do you believe that the President is ineligible for office based on the provisions of Article II Section 1?" I wonder why he choses to ignore it.

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...

In a couple years I can run for president, whatdoya think Guy?

You can run for president
being a resident.
But you're in a class
that will never pass
because royalty is the new precedent!

LOL!

ID, I would prefer that the population of New York and other metropolitan areas stay and I am willing to pay to keep them there.

Not a problem if THAT state pays the tab. Don't ask me to pay for YOUR state problems. Don't ask the Feds either, they are broke!

Why not? New York is a net contributor to the Fed, annually making a net contribution greater than the total estimated damage from Sandy ($50 billion) for all states. Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, are all in the top ten contributors ranked by revenue per capita, and all net contributors to the Fed.

If the Red States want to reduce federal spending, they could stop taking money from the blue states, just like they did with the stimulus package (source ;-) ).

---

I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...