I do, i love all the attention i'm getting. Its great!

John :)

Agreed. He certainly does seem to be enjoying all the attention in the meantime. ;-)

I think he wants to keep this going as long as he can. Once he gives it all away and we drive a coach and horses all through it, his credibility is finished.

All we have is guesses unless he tells us. I don't have time for games and if he truly wants us to believe as he does, he needs to help more than he has.

He could be going on about the Hexapla or the Masoretic Text.

If that is indeed the books you're "decoding", then I'm afraid you truly are using your own interpretation of those books to arrive at your conclusions. What makes you so certain that your interpretation is correct, beyond "God told me so"?

Come off it Ozzfan,
I said Genesis and Revelation name the "old books" i am working on. I didn't say the Bible is the book. I have said this many times.

John.

So more games and you can't just say the names.

No, i can't, i'm sorry. You will just have to read the 2 book links i gave you to find out.

Hard luck buddy. You had your chance.

John.

If you're not willing to help people out so they can follow along the same path you have, then you are not really trying to have a discussion on what it is you believe and why.

I don't need any chances. I just want to understand better and that is up to you to help others. If you can't be bothered, that isn't part of their luck that prevents them. It all lies within you.

If that is indeed the books you're "decoding", then I'm afraid you truly are using your own interpretation of those books to arrive at your conclusions. What makes you so certain that your interpretation is correct, beyond "God told me so"?

Come off it Ozzfan,
I said Genesis and Revelation name the "old books" i am working on. I didn't say the Bible is the book. I have said this many times.

John.

So more games and you can't just say the names.

No, i can't, i'm sorry. You will just have to read the 2 book links i gave you to find out.

Hard luck buddy. You had your chance.

John.

If that is indeed the books you're "decoding", then I'm afraid you truly are using your own interpretation of those books to arrive at your conclusions. What makes you so certain that your interpretation is correct, beyond "God told me so"?

Come off it Ozzfan,
I said Genesis and Revelation name the "old books" i am working on. I didn't say the Bible is the book. I have said this many times.

John.

So more games and you can't just say the names.

Just WAG is all that I see here. No real science that can be tested. GIGO.

Robert,
You do "Intelligent Design theory" an injustice by having it as your user name. I have read lots of messages posted by you and not once have i heard you say anything that remotely sounds like "Intelligent Design theory".

John.

If that is indeed the books you're "decoding", then I'm afraid you truly are using your own interpretation of those books to arrive at your conclusions. What makes you so certain that your interpretation is correct, beyond "God told me so"?

Come off it Ozzfan,
I said Genesis and Revelation name the "old books" i am working on. I didn't say the Bible is the book. I have said this many times.

John.

Just WAG is all that I see here. No real science that can be tested. GIGO.

If that is indeed the books you're "decoding", then I'm afraid you truly are using your own interpretation of those books to arrive at your conclusions. What makes you so certain that your interpretation is correct, beyond "God told me so"?

There are tons of old books and there are tons of references to the pyramids. I'm not going to play a game trying to figure out which one it is only to find out I was wrong.

You have the name of the books. Cite your sources and let us decide for ourselves.

Ozzfan,
I'm being very nice to you.

The answer your are looking for is in two books. The first book of the Bible, and the last book of the Bible. The Bible actually names the books that i am working on. It names them for you Ozzfan!

Here are the links;

Book of Genesis; (Bible book 1)
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+1&version=NIV

Book of Revelation; (Bible book 66)
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation+1&version=NIV

John.

There are tons of old books and there are tons of references to the pyramids. I'm not going to play a game trying to figure out which one it is only to find out I was wrong.

You have the name of the books. Cite your sources and let us decide for ourselves.

I tryed to google a 6,000 year old book. All I got was soemguy in India saying astrology was real.

---

[/quote]

Old James

So then we're down to interpretation of the books, and you want us to believe you're the only one "decoding" them correctly with the help of God.

Wouldn't it be easier just to tell us the name of the books so we can see if we come to the same conclusion you have, assuming there's no other conclusion to come to?

Ok, this couldn't be easier for you.

For the the last 2 years, i have talked non stop about Egyptian pyramids, i thought this would have been blatantly obvious at this stage.

Secondly, the Bible tells you exactly where Adam and Eve were hanging out.

So go find what i found. See if you can find what i found!

John.

So then we're down to interpretation of the books, and you want us to believe you're the only one "decoding" them correctly with the help of God.

Wouldn't it be easier just to tell us the name of the books so we can see if we come to the same conclusion you have, assuming there's no other conclusion to come to?

The book has been radio carbon dated by archaeologists.

How do we know that the findings are accurate? There's a lot of bad archaeology out there. Has the findings been peer-reviewed and is it generally accepted that this book is indeed thousands of years old?

If so, how do we know you're "decoding" it properly, and not just applying today's knowledge to yesteryear's writings as you've done for the Bible? What makes your conclusions accurate?

The books are NOT all in one place. Parts of the book are spread out across several countries. Because of this, many many different archaeologists have found different parts of the book on different sites in different countries. So at this stage, i'm guessing that thousands of independent Carbon 14 dates have been recorded for different parts of the book. So in all the archaeological journals, the archaeologists are all in agreement about the dating. The books are very old!

Ohhh yes, these are peer-reviewed journals. They are all the mainstream archaeological journals. This stuff is NOT hidden, as i said, thousands of people walk past the book every day and don't really give it a second thought because they don't know that it was God that wrote the book. The archaeologists are telling them something else, and the public are gullible enough to just believe the archaeologists. Hence they walk straight past the book and carry on enjoying their holiday not knowing any better.

John.

The book has been radio carbon dated by archaeologists.

How do we know that the findings are accurate? There's a lot of bad archaeology out there. Has the findings been peer-reviewed and is it generally accepted that this book is indeed thousands of years old?

If so, how do we know you're "decoding" it properly, and not just applying today's knowledge to yesteryear's writings as you've done for the Bible? What makes your conclusions accurate?

I would also like to know why you believe this "journal" of God is in fact the real journal of God? What evidence do you have to suggest that whatever book you claim to have found is legitimate?

The book has been radio carbon dated by archaeologists. The book is thousands of years old. There are many many many parts to this book, or books. Its not in one nice clean single book.

And its God's science journal because it contains scientific information about the "creation" of mankind. And God did indeed publish it himself, in person.

Yep, the best way to describe it is to call it "God's science journal". Or as i like to say, the "old book" or "old books" because that what God calls them in the Christian Bible, the Jewish Torah and the Islamic Koran. He calls them "books that were written from the foundation of the world". In the Bible he says that the books are "Sealed till the end time". That time is now, and i'm opening the books to read them out to the whole world.

John.