Message boards :
Politics :
Uruguay to legalize and sell cannabis
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Ex: "Socialist" Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 3433 Credit: 2,616,158 RAC: 2 |
In a recent conversation with a thorasic surgeon the subject drifted onto various forms of lung irritant and toxin that might lead to lung cancer. He said, and I can only repeat what he said, that he is seeing an increase in lung cancer among younger people, and that this tends to be among younger people who have been active cannabis users. His hypothesis is that because they tend to inhale more deeply, and hold the smoke in their lungs for longer the tars have longer to deposit on the lung surface deeper in the lung. He says these tars are the prime cause of lung cancer, and are just as, if not more, prevalent in cannabis smoke as tobacco smoke. I'd have to agree with this. It seems to make sense that anything you smoke can cause cancer... -But cigarettes are legal. Far as driving, I'm sure someone who is stoned is probably impaired. However anyone who has had enough to drink is DEFINITELY impaired. -But alcohol is legal. So basically I feel what it comes down to is, if we allow ciggs and alcohol, there's no reason you can give me why Marijuana should be illegal. Unless of course they illegalize ciggs and alcohol too. (And we know how that would go) Legalize it, and you'll get rid of the modern day Capones... #resist |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22190 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
It is often recanted that if either tobacco or alcohol were to be the "new" drug then they would be banned in much the same way as cannabis is. One truth with tobacco and alcohol is that they've been around for long enough in common use for governments to have worked out that they are a very good source of income, despite the ongoing health care costs associated with them both. Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
bobby Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 3 |
It is often recanted that if either tobacco or alcohol were to be the "new" drug then they would be banned in much the same way as cannabis is. One truth with tobacco and alcohol is that they've been around for long enough in common use for governments to have worked out that they are a very good source of income, despite the ongoing health care costs associated with them both. The same truth can't be said for cannabis can it? I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ... |
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
The thing is, both tobacco and alcohol have been demonstrated to be quite effective killers -- this is important, especially when we know we have to kill off the poor and elderly as quickly as possible in order to balance government budgets. <smile>
|
Bob DeWoody Send message Joined: 9 May 10 Posts: 3387 Credit: 4,182,900 RAC: 10 |
Oh, how little you know Sarge. Nobody has ever thought of me as a liberal hippie. And I can't afford to smoke enough pot to be labelled as a chronic smoker. I don't know you personally but I'd be curious to know whether you are a consumer of alcohol and if so how much? If people would come out and say stright up what they mean, other less clever people when it comes to writing in code might not miss their point so often. Bob DeWoody My motto: Never do today what you can put off until tomorrow as it may not be required. This no longer applies in light of current events. |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11361 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
Bob, given the laws in this country it is probably not safe to state one's views for some people. Face it there are many who feel it is their duty to persecute those who advocate any use of pot. |
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Sarge, that alcohol *and* smoke tobacco is likely off mark. Back in the day, I inhaled -- but NEVER had a cigarette. I suspect I have company from back then and today. It has been a VERY long time since I inhaled -- though when going through chemo 7 years ago, my oncologist did suggest it might be a useful option.
|
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Sarge, your argument is that by legalizing weed, the use rates will soar. That is an opinion. Of course, by making it legal, we will depopulate jails and we know all those convicts are terrible drivers.
|
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Sarge, notice my use of tense there -- none of that set of former presidents would run today (two being deceased). For what it's worth, Nixon at one point in an interview said that he tried it.
|
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Dave, I agree with most of this -- aside from the DNR comment -- which I'd submit would be useful in many cases (not just for drug overdoses). Note, a DNR wouldn't matter for most drug use scenarios -- just severe overdoses (or stupid first timers who don't have a clue). The thing is, a very large piece of our health care costs are due to a lack of advanced directives being in place and/or if in place, not followed, resulting in heroic interventions and invasive support which rarely has a good outcome.
|
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Gary, I pretty much agree with you on this one -- though more of the health care cost is at other end of life scenarios as well where an advanced directive should apply. If marijuana joined tobacco and alcohol in the list of 'regulated and taxed, but legal' and required a *conditional* DNR -- it would be along with tobacco and alcohol though, right. After all, tobacco and alcohol cause a lot of lingering death, and alcohol certainly causes a fair amount of 'wrap around a pole' scenarios. b) Gary: I think it's ridiculous that you think someone who has "partaken" should have to sign a DNR. Really? If that's the case then I'd argue everyone who wants to have a beer better be signing the same damn DNR. |
Ex: "Socialist" Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 3433 Credit: 2,616,158 RAC: 2 |
Of course, by making it legal, we will depopulate jails... I dunno about that. People that are in jail far pot related offenses I would believe were people in possession of very large amounts, at a time when it is illegal to do so (currently). If they change any laws I don't think any existing sentences should be thrown out. I still think even if use was made legal, with or without a prescription, there would still be laws preventing people from trafficking large amounts, unless of course doing it within the rules of the system (regulation, taxation, permits, etc). #resist |
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Well, I didn't put a time limit on it -- wouldn't be instantaneous upon legalization. But I suspect some states, in a budgetary move would press to reduce the population sooner rather than later. Just how many folks are in jails and prisons for violation of alcohol and tobacco illegal trafficking? It isn't zero of course, but I suspect it isn't all that large either. Understand, for the municipalities, state as well as the Federal government - prison populations cost a lot of money (a LOT of money for most states), and of course enforcement of 'drug war' laws also costs a lot of money. It becomes a major budget issue, via regulation and taxation, what is currently a major drain on budgets becomes a revenue source. Of course, by making it legal, we will depopulate jails... |
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Not to worry Guy, if it is bad for people and/or the environment, oligarchic capitalism will provide it readily. Legalize all drugs--natural and unnatural. If capitalism can't handle the demand, it should be taken over by the government at all levels. Free chemicals for everybody. |
Misfit Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 |
Uruguay president: Only pot will be legal BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) -- Uruguay's president has made it clear that his plan for legalizing marijuana in the South American nation does not mean he favors legalizing any other illicit drugs. President Jose Mujica said in an interview Thursday with Colombia's RCN radio network that he does not yet know when his government will present Uruguay's Congress with the legislative proposal. Mujica's party dominates Congress. He says the plan is for the government to sell marijuana at a cheap and reasonable price then monitor what each consumer uses. The idea is to take drug profits out of the hands of criminals. Mujica says that while drug addiction is a medical problem, drug trafficking is an unwinnable police problem. Uruguay would be the world's first nation to sell marijuana directly. me@rescam.org |
Blurf Send message Joined: 2 Sep 06 Posts: 8962 Credit: 12,678,685 RAC: 0 |
Having worked in the field of Addictions in the past (formerly licensed social worker specializing in substance abuse) I've seen the full spectrum of problems caused by many different drugs. In my experience, Alcohol is almost always a companion to the cannabis smoker. Not 100% but in a very high correlation. I am also of two minds. 1) I have friends with cancer who have benefitted from smoking Cannabis. It has eased their pain. I cannot deny this although I choose not be present when they smoke. 2) I have a family member who is a chronic alcoholic and cannabis addict. Those who say it's not addictive--sorry I disagree. If he drank he couldn't stay away from the smoke---it was a hand-held dbl addiction. Now that he's sober he doesn't smoke but the multiple times he's relapsed, he HAS to smoke when drunk. It's a double-edged sword for me. |
OzzFan Send message Joined: 9 Apr 02 Posts: 15691 Credit: 84,761,841 RAC: 28 |
Marijuana is psychologically addictive, not physically addictive. Since psychological addictions are also known as "habits", they are not classified as addictions. |
Ex: "Socialist" Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 3433 Credit: 2,616,158 RAC: 2 |
Anything can be addictive. Food, sex, shopping, driving, working, sporting, oh and even blogging. [sarcasm] Perhaps the above should all be made illegal also? [/sarcasm] I think that someone who has a tendency for addiction will have a tendency to be addicted to anything can supply a 'high', perhaps this is why some people notice a correlation between alcohol/cigarette users, and users of other substances? In the end, the real issue at hand is the addict, not the object of their addiction. We don't make alcohol illegal, instead we make harsh laws to enforce safe use of alcohol, and deal with the addicts on a per-addict basis.. #resist |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.