Message boards :
Number crunching :
Short estimated runtimes - don't panic
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
People running fast GPUs - especially with optimised or other third-party applications - may have noticed that work allocated since the end of maintenance today has exceptionally short estimated runtimes. Like the thread title says, Don't Panic! This was planned and expected. The work itself is exactly the same as before, it's just the estimates which may be screwy for a while. Not everyone will even be affected. If you are one of the ones seeing short runtime estimates, you'll also see that BOINC tries - but in the current state of comms, probably fails - to fetch more work than normal. This is why the limits on 'tasks in progress' were put in place - tonight's the night when we need them. But even with the limits in place, some people may end up with more work cached than they're really comfortable with. Just set 'no new tasks' if you seem to be getting too much. As soon as the first short-estimate task reaches the head of the queue and crunches - in the normal time, of course - all the estimates will jump back to normal. You may end up with more tasks than you really need, and perhaps a bit of 'high priority' running, but it should be manageable and burn itself off without any action on your part. And then, in another two or three weeks, we'll do it all again. Enjoy. (and no, this is nothing whatsoever to do with the release of BOINC 7) |
red-ray Send message Joined: 24 Jun 99 Posts: 308 Credit: 9,029,848 RAC: 0 |
Thank you for the warning. I assume this is why my DCF is jumping all over the place. 10-Apr-2012 21:20:40 [SETI@home] [dcf] DCF: 0.431077->5.996127, raw_ratio 5.996127, adj_ratio 13.909641 With my mix of GPU speeds I have only just got things stable so now I guess I will need to reduce the <flops> on my GPUs. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Thank you for the warning. I assume this is why my DCF is jumping all over the place. Actually, if your flops entries were accurately calculated in the first place - difficult-to-impossible with your mixture of cards, I know - you should have seen no change at all. My post - more of an informational message than a warning - was intended mainly for people who have installed optimised apps, but haven't fiddled by hand with their app_info.xml file. They will see the changes most clearly, but - as I hope my post made clear - they don't need to change anything. Do not adjust your set |
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6658 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
To me this sounds like very good news! I am very pleased to see something happening with this issue! Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
My AP_v6 estimates have dropped just about in half. Last week, they dropped to just under 5 hours, now they're down to 5:42:42. It should only take just one task to complete (which should be in the next hour or so) to self-correct though. Good thing my 10-day cache was already full though. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
AndrewM Send message Joined: 5 Jan 08 Posts: 369 Credit: 34,275,196 RAC: 0 |
Amused rather than paniced. I have some MB work units due back on 25th April. They're estimated at 40 seconds. I mean the 680's are good, but not that good. lol AndrewM |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13846 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Amused rather than paniced. I have some MB work units due back on 25th April. They're estimated at 40 seconds. Wait for the applications to be optimised for the new cards. Running one at a time, 40 seconds wouldn't surprise me for a shorty. As for the reduced estimated times; instead of them being way, way, way, way, way out they're just way, way out. A lot closer than they were, but still a long way from the mark. Grant Darwin NT |
soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6497 Credit: 34,134,168 RAC: 0 |
Could we get the "Don't Panic" in bold friendly letters please? Janice |
Slavac Send message Joined: 27 Apr 11 Posts: 1932 Credit: 17,952,639 RAC: 0 |
|
Horacio Send message Joined: 14 Jan 00 Posts: 536 Credit: 75,967,266 RAC: 0 |
Actually, if your flops entries were accurately calculated in the first place - difficult-to-impossible with your mixture of cards, I know - you should have seen no change at all. Just curiosity, if flops are used then there should no be changes in the estimations? Does it means that they are playing with the APR? (I'm using flops, and I've not seen any change, but neither I've seen any change in my, ussually, very high APR values..) |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Running Boinc 6.10.xx and the latest app from Jason. Er, I think that's what I said would happen. Nice when things go according to plan. |
Slavac Send message Joined: 27 Apr 11 Posts: 1932 Credit: 17,952,639 RAC: 0 |
Running Boinc 6.10.xx and the latest app from Jason. Well, sorta. Now the figures are all over the board. It'll sort itself out in a bit. Executive Director GPU Users Group Inc. - brad@gpuug.org |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Actually, if your flops entries were accurately calculated in the first place - difficult-to-impossible with your mixture of cards, I know - you should have seen no change at all. No, not 'playing with' - just a step towards using the whole APR properly. For a while, we allowed APR to grow to unbelievable figures, and then stopped believing it. Now, we're starting to keep the value sane - and so we can start believing it again, as we should have been able to all along. |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Running Boinc 6.10.xx and the latest app from Jason. Are you saying you ran that task out of sequence? Sounds like you might be one of the ones where the cache gets too large, in spite of the limits on tasks in progress. Set 'no new tasks' for a few hours while you burn off the old work in sequence, then let it settle back down again with new work only. |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19367 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Well would you believe that, after 8 months I finally get an AP task with estimate that makes sense. Definitely a red letter day |
shizaru Send message Joined: 14 Jun 04 Posts: 1130 Credit: 1,967,904 RAC: 0 |
Probably a dumb question, but since I don't know the answer I'll ask it anyway:-) My GPU estimates (to completion times) are still at almost 3x. I realize my ION is not a fast GPU, but it has reported around 10 tasks since the outage. Is this normal? Here's my little cruncher |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13846 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
My GPU estimates (to completion times) are still at almost 3x. I realize my ION is not a fast GPU, but it has reported around 10 tasks since the outage. Is this normal? Yep. As you report WUs with the shorter runtime things will stabilise, sort of. 3x is a big improvement on 20-30x. As mentioned in the first post, in a few more weeks there will be another tweak to the estimated completion times. Which means, maybe, if we're really, really, really lucky, possibly before the end of the year, fingers crossed, we might be able to get a cache of GPU work that's good for more than 24 hours. Maybe. Grant Darwin NT |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19367 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Probably a dumb question, but since I don't know the answer I'll ask it anyway:-) The new estimates are only for tasks d/loaded since the outage. |
shizaru Send message Joined: 14 Jun 04 Posts: 1130 Credit: 1,967,904 RAC: 0 |
The new estimates are only for tasks d/loaded since the outage. I'll go find something to bang my head on! Thanx:-) |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19367 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
The new estimates are only for tasks d/loaded since the outage. Don't use my bit of the wall, it's beginning to crumble from over use. ;-) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.