Message boards :
Politics :
A country that dosen't exist:England
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
GalaxyIce Send message Joined: 13 May 06 Posts: 8927 Credit: 1,361,057 RAC: 0
|
Ah but the United Kingdom will not break up. It will change into the "United Kingdom of England, Wales and Northern Ireland". Thank you very much, the name "England" will finally officially reappear. But we all have to have a passports reprinted with the new name and show them at the Scottish/England border. flaming balloons |
Sirius B ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 21804 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 15
|
Even BOINC does not allow you to choose "England" as a country; you have to settle for "United Kingdom". But if the Union does break up England will have to become a nation or risk becoming a pebble on a beach. |
GalaxyIce Send message Joined: 13 May 06 Posts: 8927 Credit: 1,361,057 RAC: 0
|
Even BOINC does not allow you to choose "England" as a country; you have to settle for "United Kingdom". You're making it all up. BOINC is not interested in where we were born. BOINC wants to know in which country you are BOINCing and chooses not to include a country called "England". flaming balloons |
Gone with the wind ![]() Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 41704 Credit: 42,645,437 RAC: 95 |
Even BOINC does not allow you to choose "England" as a country; you have to settle for "United Kingdom". That is mainly because most web pages ask for Nationality and not Country of birth. As has been said before, in legislation, England is a Country and not a Nation. In which case the title of this thread is incorrect. But yep, I agree with Nick, I'm not over fussed about it either. |
|
Nick Send message Joined: 11 Oct 11 Posts: 4344 Credit: 3,313,107 RAC: 0
|
Even BOINC does not allow you to choose "England" as a country; you have to settle for "United Kingdom". That's correct but as a unionist this does not bother me too much. Especially so as most of what the UK has achieved over many years, past and present, was done so as a union and not as a single country by the name of England where I was born and still reside today. The Kite Fliers -------------------- Kite fliers: An imaginary club of solo members, those who don't yet belong to a formal team so "fly their own kites" - as the saying goes. |
Gone with the wind ![]() Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 41704 Credit: 42,645,437 RAC: 95 |
I have to say John that, with the greatest of respect, may I please disagree with you. Yes, HM QEII will in all probability, surpass Queen Victoria's record as the longest reigning Monarch, and she has signalled that she intends to carry on until her demise. And I would suspect that she would do that, even after the death of the Duke. It is a measure of the woman that she is, in a life long service to her people. But, I do believe that Prince Charles, whatever people may think of him, has earned the right to take his place as King, as the longest ever Heir apparent. Now, the question is of course, will he want to rule until his own death, or will he decide to hand over to Prince William after a certain time. That is of course the unknown question. |
John Clark Send message Joined: 29 Sep 99 Posts: 16515 Credit: 4,418,829 RAC: 0
|
Legality Given the Queen and Duke of Edinburgh continue to have good health, I believe the Queen wants to better the time of Victoria's reign then go for a new record. This, I think, means Charles will never ascend the throne, and would accord with the general view of the UK population, and the second in line will take the reigns in the event of either the deaths of the Queen or, more likely, the Duke. It's good to be back amongst friends and colleagues
|
|
bobby "snowflake" Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 8
|
Even the yanks could join in on this thread...they have New York, Boston, New England & their main language is English (Albeit Americanised) Seems the OED has a different opinion. There's a place for z's and a place for s's, though perhaps I'm over analysing whether "americanized" is correct. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...
|
Gone with the wind ![]() Send message Joined: 19 Nov 00 Posts: 41704 Credit: 42,645,437 RAC: 95 |
|
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 13795 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 151
|
the candidate they'd choose would surely be… the Queen. She won't be a problem because Charles will be the Monarch, who probably will not be on the throne very long. |
GalaxyIce Send message Joined: 13 May 06 Posts: 8927 Credit: 1,361,057 RAC: 0
|
|
Sirius B ![]() Send message Joined: 26 Dec 00 Posts: 21804 Credit: 3,081,182 RAC: 15
|
Even the yanks could join in on this thread...they have New York, Boston, New England & their main language is English (Albeit Americanised) LOL....We're talking about England & we use an S to your Z |
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 13795 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 151
|
And why we still have a Monarchy or a thought for anti-monarchists to chew on Not everyone will celebrate the 60th anniversary of the Queen's accession to the throne. There are still those who would prefer Britain to have an elected head of state. Let's imagine for a moment that the anti-monarchists got their way, the Queen were stripped of her crown, and we were asked to pick a president. What sort of person would we want to vote for, if we were completely free to choose? First of all, we'd want someone who is popular not only at home but abroad. We'd want someone who could be relied on to act with grace, dignity, elegance and tact. We'd want someone who would rise above the childish, bickering scramble of politics. We'd want someone who would perform their duties untiringly and uncomplainingly. And we'd want someone who could be guaranteed never to bring the nation into disrepute. It's hard to think of candidates who would fulfil all those criteria. But one does spring to mind. This is where anti-monarchism hits a snag. Because if the people of Britain were free to vote for anyone to be their head of state, the candidate they'd choose would surely be… the Queen. From the Telegraph |
GalaxyIce Send message Joined: 13 May 06 Posts: 8927 Credit: 1,361,057 RAC: 0
|
|
GalaxyIce Send message Joined: 13 May 06 Posts: 8927 Credit: 1,361,057 RAC: 0
|
Ultimately, that's what the history books are written about, and determine who people truly *are* Very well said archangel,the whole thing not just the last line I quote out of brevity. But why cannot the English have a flag against their avatar here in BOINC that is an England flag? Does it matter that this confusion of identity exists? Does it matter for the English? For the originator of this thread? For anyone else now scratching their heads? England certainly caused this conundrum and then declared that the country does not exist as a nationalty. English by origin but not by nationality. Ah, OK, was it anything to do with trying to remove the nationality of Ireland, Scotland and Wales? In becoming Great Britain and then the United Kingdom when Ireland regained its nationality? flaming balloons |
archangel Send message Joined: 25 Apr 01 Posts: 62 Credit: 1,842,428 RAC: 0
|
I'm all for regional autonomy; i mean i was born a Georgia boy, raised a southerner, and found out i was an American after the fact... That said, there is no truth but that which your eyes confirm. Einstein went on about relativity, Darwin had his evolution, Newton propounded his gravity, Galileo proposed that the Earth was not the center of the universe... One of these has turned out to be true... The rest are still referred to as theories, even by scientists. There is a reason for that: However true something is likely to be, we only know that which we can perceive on a personal level. I don't feel relative, evolved or gravitational... It doesn't mean I'm not, i just don't feel that way when i get out of bed in the morning. By contrast, i do feel particularly southern, Georgian, and now by proxy, Louisianian, when i wake up. Once again, it doesn't *mean* i am, by god i just feel that way... Maybe that's what Einstein meant when he spoke of things being relative, our perception of them determine truth. That said, i don't feel less Georgian by being American.. Nor do i feel less Georgian by being Louisianian... And i most certainly don't feel less Southern by being both Georgian and Louisianian... Quite the opposite in fact. Conversely, i do feel particularly less 'American' by being Southern... My whole life i have heard Americans referred to as another name, "Yankees", and not in flattering terms. I was not alive to be aggrieved myself, but the stories that were handed down of those, "damned raping, burning pillaging Yankees who came through and destroyed an agrarian utopia", left their mark. I *knew* people who were aggrieved. My mother was 25 years removed from her mother having her house burned by Yankee pillagers. I *knew* people who lost. My uncle's wife married my uncle because it was the dying wish of her grandfather, who wrote a letter to his son, prior to his charge with Pickett at Gettysburg. They were still alive when i was young. Maybe that's what makes us who we are?... Those we knew? It's probably just all in our heads, but then so are our lives. So is everything. The loss, the love, the hate, the venom, truth, the lie... It's all a matter of our own perception. A man isn't any slur because i call him a slur, but that same slur carries life or death consequences. Not because of the words, nor the truth, but because of each individuals perception of them. Ultimately, whether you are English, or British, or American, or southern, Georgian, Louisianian, or any other title or slur you can think of, has nothing to do with where you were born, who, or what you are, or any other logistical fact... It is nothing more than how you feel about yourself and the word you are called by. Be who you want, of where you want, and by whom you want. No paid mapmaker can alter the truth of your personal experience. Fight whom you must to make your truth felt among others. Ultimately, that's what the history books are written about, and determine who people truly *are* |
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 11664 Credit: 8,568,819 RAC: 213
|
Even the yanks could join in on this thread...they have New York, Boston, New England & their main language is English (Albeit Americanised) Plus "Zed" :P |
GalaxyIce Send message Joined: 13 May 06 Posts: 8927 Credit: 1,361,057 RAC: 0
|
THERE'LL ALWAYS BE AN ENGLAND There'll always be an England, While there's a country lane, Wherever there's a cottage small Beside a field of grain. There'll always be an England, While there's a busy street, Wherever there's a turning wheel A million marching feet. Red, white and blue, What does it mean to you? Surely you're proud Shout it aloud. Britons awake! The Empire too, We can depend on you, Freedom remains These are the chains Nothing can break. There'll always be an England, And England shall be free, If England means as much to you As England means to me. "This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle, This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars, This other Eden, demi-paradise, This fortress built by Nature for herself Against infection and the hand of war, This happy breed of men, this little world, This precious stone set in a silver sea, Which serves it in the office of a wall, Or as a moat defensive to a house Against the envy of less happier lands This blessed plot, this earth, this realm This England" flaming balloons |
|
bobby "snowflake" Send message Joined: 22 Mar 02 Posts: 2866 Credit: 17,789,109 RAC: 8
|
Even the yanks could join in on this thread...they have New York, Boston, New England & their main language is English (Albeit Americanised) To be fair the 's' is a modern affectation in British English, use of 'z' was still the preferred spelling of many words in British English dictionaries into the 1990s (the last time I had regular access to new editions). I curse Microsoft Word and it's UK English spell checker as it, like many Americans, believe that the 's' version is preferred. I think you'll find it's a bit more complicated than that ...
|
Sarge Send message Joined: 25 Aug 99 Posts: 11664 Credit: 8,568,819 RAC: 213
|
Even the yanks could join in on this thread...they have New York, Boston, New England & their main language is English (Albeit Americanised) AmericaniZed. +Zed for your post due to this error. |
©2020 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.