Gripes and Kudos II

Message boards : Number crunching : Gripes and Kudos II
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile SonicAgamemnon Project Donor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Apr 06
Posts: 33
Credit: 28,451,253
RAC: 6,565
United States
Message 1341278 - Posted: 27 Feb 2013, 14:39:52 UTC - in response to Message 1341273.  

...The Retry Now button is unavailable if there are no uploads or downloads to retry.

The Update button is always available because there are reasons for contacting the scheduler other than getting new work. For example, you may have updated your preferences on your account page on the web site and you want your computer to make contact so it will know your new prefs. This will result in the "Not reporting or requesting" message.


Thanks for the explanation; I hadn't noticed that delta in button behavior. However, I'm a bit dissappointed, mainly becuase the disable logic is already in place for one button but not the other, because the Update button is loaded with several responsibilities, making it convenient but ripe for misuse and a source for raising the annoyance factor. I would prefer to isolate the upload/download behavior with the Retry Now button only, removing that behaivor from the other catch-all Update button.

But this is just one person's subjective opinion, and I give it with the best of intentions. BTW, I feel comfortable expressing this because I have just sent a donation check in the mail, so I do have some skin in the game...

"History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren't there." - Santayana
ID: 1341278 · Report as offensive
Profile Cornhusker

Send message
Joined: 20 Apr 09
Posts: 41
Credit: 43,937,361
RAC: 6,335
United States
Message 1341798 - Posted: 28 Feb 2013, 23:21:30 UTC

It looks like I'm back to not being able to download again. I've got a screenfull of downloads. Watching them I find that some downloads -- while they're actively downloading and the percentage is going up -- time out and go to the bottom of the queue. Then another partially downloaded task begins and -- sometime while downloading -- times out.

This may be partially due to having my preferences set for Astropulse tasks only, which are 8 MB in size. I have now changed my preference to seti@home tasks only. I'm hoping the smaller file sizes will lead to more tasks completing on the first try.
The plan that was announced a while back for you guys to quadruple the task sizes has me worried. It seems far fewer tasks (probably at least 4 times fewer tasks) will download on the first try, and the overhead of increased restarts will more than offset any advantage that increased task size has on your database.

After all, if no one can get any work you don't even need a database.

ID: 1341798 · Report as offensive
Profile Jim Bryan

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 12
Posts: 14
Credit: 2,755,063
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1342595 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 4:28:29 UTC

I know this has probably already been addressed before, but I can't find it. I have 2 computers running seti. One is an older desktop unit with 2 cpus and a laptop with 4. My older unit always has plenty of data to process while my laptop rarely has enough to get through the day. I have increased my data reservoir up to 3 days and only the desktop is increased. What do I need to do?
ID: 1342595 · Report as offensive
Profile betreger
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jun 99
Posts: 9343
Credit: 24,667,654
RAC: 21,722
United States
Message 1342597 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 4:46:50 UTC - in response to Message 1215962.  

Amen
ID: 1342597 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 11480
Credit: 167,572,053
RAC: 106,458
Australia
Message 1342602 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 5:26:16 UTC - in response to Message 1342595.  

I have increased my data reservoir up to 3 days and only the desktop is increased. What do I need to do?

It won't make much difference as there is a server side limit of 100WUs per CPU & 100WUs per GPU.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1342602 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,387,068
RAC: 438
United Kingdom
Message 1342642 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 10:07:18 UTC - in response to Message 1342602.  

I have increased my data reservoir up to 3 days and only the desktop is increased. What do I need to do?

It won't make much difference as there is a server side limit of 100WUs per CPU & 100WUs per GPU.

It should make lots of difference, his hosts only have Eight and Fifty-Six tasks in progress respectively, well Below the limit.

Claggy
ID: 1342642 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,387,068
RAC: 438
United Kingdom
Message 1342643 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 10:15:16 UTC - in response to Message 1342595.  

I know this has probably already been addressed before, but I can't find it. I have 2 computers running seti. One is an older desktop unit with 2 cpus and a laptop with 4. My older unit always has plenty of data to process while my laptop rarely has enough to get through the day. I have increased my data reservoir up to 3 days and only the desktop is increased. What do I need to do?

Where did you increase the cache settings? In the Computing preferences page on the Setiathome website, or locally on the Computing preferences page in Boinc Manager on each host?
Note: doing it in Boinc Manager overrides the Web preferences, you'll need to Clear them if you want to use the Web preferences again,
you'll be using local preferences if you have the following line on startup in the Event log:

02/03/2013 14:32:05 | | Reading preferences override file

Claggy
ID: 1342643 · Report as offensive
david

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 73,378
RAC: 0
France
Message 1342645 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 10:28:49 UTC - in response to Message 1342643.  
Last modified: 3 Mar 2013, 10:34:21 UTC

Network Tasks ?

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/prefs.php?subset=global

Maintain enough tasks to keep busy for at least
(max 10 days).

IS IT REALLY THIS PARAMETER ?



EDIT : AFTER A TEST, I RECEIVED MORE TASK
IT SEEMS TO BE THIS ...
ID: 1342645 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,387,068
RAC: 438
United Kingdom
Message 1342648 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 10:50:47 UTC - in response to Message 1342645.  
Last modified: 3 Mar 2013, 10:51:41 UTC

Network Tasks ?

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/prefs.php?subset=global

Maintain enough tasks to keep busy for at least
(max 10 days).

IS IT REALLY THIS PARAMETER ?



EDIT : AFTER A TEST, I RECEIVED MORE TASK
IT SEEMS TO BE THIS ...

Yes, But it is also the 'and up to an additional' setting too, for Boinc 7 you should put a very small value in the additional setting if you want more frequent topups
(Boinc 7 will fill to the 1st and 2nd cache values, then wait until the total cache available falls below the 1st setting before asking again)

Claggy
ID: 1342648 · Report as offensive
david

Send message
Joined: 28 Aug 05
Posts: 3
Credit: 73,378
RAC: 0
France
Message 1342650 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 11:02:02 UTC - in response to Message 1342648.  

ok thanks
ID: 1342650 · Report as offensive
Profile Jim Bryan

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 12
Posts: 14
Credit: 2,755,063
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1342745 - Posted: 3 Mar 2013, 18:36:23 UTC - in response to Message 1342643.  

Thanks. Fixed the problem.
ID: 1342745 · Report as offensive
Profile Jim_S
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Feb 00
Posts: 4702
Credit: 61,814,221
RAC: 14,429
United States
Message 1343224 - Posted: 5 Mar 2013, 11:54:13 UTC
Last modified: 5 Mar 2013, 11:54:36 UTC

Gripes: Having to pull My thread back on track and AP's take to long to Download.
Kudos: Letting the thread wander this far due to some really GREAT INFO. ;o)

I Desire Peace and Justice, Jim Scott (Mod-Ret.)
ID: 1343224 · Report as offensive
Profile Gary Charpentier Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 00
Posts: 25398
Credit: 48,694,875
RAC: 25,513
United States
Message 1344220 - Posted: 8 Mar 2013, 21:51:33 UTC

Kudos: For the fix for TCP issues for windows machines.

Gripe: To M$ for not having it as the default!

ID: 1344220 · Report as offensive
Profile Mark Wyzenbeek
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 99
Posts: 134
Credit: 6,203,079
RAC: 6
United States
Message 1344301 - Posted: 9 Mar 2013, 2:19:52 UTC

Kudos: The above.

Gripe: No link. Try this: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=71002
The Universe is not only stranger than you imagine, it's stranger than you can imagine.

SETI@home classic workunits 1,405 CPU time 57,318 hours
ID: 1344301 · Report as offensive
Profile cov_route
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 13 Sep 12
Posts: 342
Credit: 10,270,618
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1344647 - Posted: 9 Mar 2013, 17:30:27 UTC

Kudos: cdemers for the TCP fix. He should get a free shopping spree in the Seti@Home gift shop.
ID: 1344647 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob Bainbridge

Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 01
Posts: 63
Credit: 121,602,117
RAC: 30,834
United States
Message 1345890 - Posted: 12 Mar 2013, 21:33:39 UTC

My question is how do some of the powerhouse computers, such as one with 8 GTX-690 video cards keep busy. Do they get special treatment? I have 2 slow ones and 1 with GTX-480 and 1 with GTX-570. For many weeks now either one or the other of these two have had no WU's. It seems to alternate. Right now one has only GPU WU's and for several days the other had only CPU WU's. At one time my RAC was up to almost 50k but is now just starting to go back up from 18k The 2 slow machines rarely have a problem getting WU's. I've been crunching 13 years but am considering calling it quits.

Bob B.
ID: 1345890 · Report as offensive
Profile Wiggo "Democratic Socialist"
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Jan 00
Posts: 16569
Credit: 221,141,803
RAC: 176,003
Australia
Message 1345894 - Posted: 12 Mar 2013, 21:39:22 UTC - in response to Message 1345890.  

My question is how do some of the powerhouse computers, such as one with 8 GTX-690 video cards keep busy. Do they get special treatment? I have 2 slow ones and 1 with GTX-480 and 1 with GTX-570. For many weeks now either one or the other of these two have had no WU's. It seems to alternate. Right now one has only GPU WU's and for several days the other had only CPU WU's. At one time my RAC was up to almost 50k but is now just starting to go back up from 18k The 2 slow machines rarely have a problem getting WU's. I've been crunching 13 years but am considering calling it quits.

Bob B.

Have you read the Windows TCP Settings - Follow up - Help with server communication yet?

Cheers.
ID: 1345894 · Report as offensive
Profile Bob Bainbridge

Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 01
Posts: 63
Credit: 121,602,117
RAC: 30,834
United States
Message 1346374 - Posted: 14 Mar 2013, 2:58:45 UTC - in response to Message 1345894.  

I don't know that network speed is my problem but I'll give it a try.
Thanx, Bob
ID: 1346374 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 11480
Credit: 167,572,053
RAC: 106,458
Australia
Message 1346411 - Posted: 14 Mar 2013, 6:34:45 UTC - in response to Message 1346374.  

I don't know that network speed is my problem but I'll give it a try.
Thanx, Bob

It's not a speed problem, it's a congestion problem.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 1346411 · Report as offensive
Profile Mark W. Patton
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 30 Jul 99
Posts: 9
Credit: 4,035,058
RAC: 0
United States
Message 1346829 - Posted: 15 Mar 2013, 13:37:36 UTC

I am just wondering why the download bandwidth seems so narrow. My network should be able to download a 366k work unit in 1 second but it takes days sometimes. If you have answered this question elsewhere I apologize for asking again but I support 12 different projects and it is hard to read all the message boards.
Best Regards,
Mark W. Patton

ID: 1346829 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 . . . 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Gripes and Kudos II


 
©2019 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.